Saturday, January 17, 2026

The Art of Demolishing Conventional Wisdom


I make no bones about my support for President Trump. I find him a breath of truth-infused fresh air in an age of pretending that has long been dedicated to constructingspreading, and anointing the “narrative.” By rejecting the rules of “political correctness,” Trump is willing to say what others will not. By rejecting conventional “wisdom,” the president approaches challenges in insightful ways. By rejecting the authority of institutions compromised by political agendas, President Trump challenges corrosive policies camouflaged as “expertise.”

The president’s plain-speaking approach to governing represents a return to common sense. President Trump knows the difference between a man and a woman and does not advance the crazy notion that boys should be in girls’ locker rooms or dominate their sports. He knows that illegal aliens are, by definition, illegally inside the United States and must be removed (both for the safety and security of American citizens as well as for the preservation of any sense of the rule of law). He knows that trillions of dollars have been transferred from the poorest westerners to the wealthiest westerners in the name of fighting “global warming” and is unwilling to perpetuate a “climate change” hoax that makes everything more expensive for those who can least afford to subsidize the scam. He recognizes that America’s real economy (as represented by local production in towns across the country) has suffered for decades, even though Wall Street’s virtual economy has almost ceaselessly posted record gains. He understands that the U.S. military can be used to achieve strategic successes without shackling multiple generations of Americans to the costly spectacles of regime change, democracy-building, and endless war on other continents.

If your personal politics overlap to some degree with President Trump’s worldview, the previous paragraph is filled with self-evident truths. What is remarkable is that every one of the above statements represents a contentious policy disagreement in the United States and across the West today. Close to half of Americans believe that biological sex can be changed; that illegal aliens have every right to burden local communities at American taxpayers’ expense; that we should be taxed for using energy, limit our use of electricity, and return to the lifestyles of a pre-industrial era; that America can magically prosper without manufacturing much of anything; and that the U.S. military should be used to promote abstract ideas rather than to secure real American interests.

This divide is not going away. Ever since community-organizer-in-chief Barack Obama encouraged an entire generation of Americans to lecture their family members during Thanksgiving dinners, there has been no escape from politics. Personal relationships and social activities that once provided Americans distinct meaning separated from external concerns over the role of government in their lives are now rare. Ever since President Trump came on the political scene and refused to pander to the Establishment’s brand of “political correctness” or pay homage to the political Left’s secular-yet-sacred shibboleths, Americans have aggressively separated into warring tribes. Mutual disdain and blinding vitriol make it nearly impossible for Americans from opposing political camps to understand each other. Lacking unifying principles or a common cause more pressing than our disagreements, Americans are at risk of losing each other. Even sober observers largely immune to political passions often publicly wonder whether this Union of ours can long survive.

As is true of most people, there are things that I believe that I cannot defend with charts and graphs. I believe that we are sometimes brought to the edge of the cliff before we remember to dig in our heels and push back against that which seeks to destroy us. I believe that suffering has a way of chiseling character out of stony selfishness. I believe that just as pain brings protective callouses, personal struggle strengthens the armor of our souls. And I believe in America.

It’s not fashionable these days to speak of America as the Founding Fathers did. The New York Times created “The 1619 Project” to rewrite America’s birth as not a seminal moment for inalienable rights and personal liberty but rather as a violent perpetuation of racism and human slavery. Ivy League professors ignore America’s historic role in advancing human freedom around the world and instead describe our origin story as one tainted by imperialism, genocide, discrimination, and patriarchy. Those same professors go out of their way to hide a century of communism’s systematic crimes, terror, and repression and the hundred million victims communist regimes have murdered. When Marxist-socialists control the universities and teachers’ unions, it should be no surprise when young Americans take their own freedoms for granted and glamorize the homicidal religion of Marx.

For American freedom to survive another century, those who understand what is at stake have a moral responsibility to speak up. President Trump’s term will come to an end in three years. American patriots will lose a loud voice in support of American exceptionalism, personal freedom, and common sense. He has done much to shake sleeping Americans awake before it is too late. But one man alone cannot write America’s future. All of us must steer our country’s ship through the storms ahead. All of us must approach our looming struggles with courage and resolve. A country’s character is its fate. Americans will decide whether our nation stands or falls.


Podcast thread for Jan 17

 


Count your blessings.

Wars Are Won by Defending Home First


A nation unable to secure its own territory and hemisphere cannot project power effectively across oceans. That top priority—Homeland Defense—is not isolationism—it's strategic necessity. Cartels had infiltrated all of America’s 50 states, Chinese entities acquired farmland adjacent to nuclear missile sites and bomber bases, and Venezuelan criminal gangs controlled urban enclaves in sanctuary cities. Fentanyl flooding through an unsecured border claimed nearly 100,000 American lives annually—ten times the toll of the Global War on Terrorism. These weren't mere nuisances; they were undeclared acts of war.

Two months after President Trump’s September 5 Executive Order restored the title “Department of War,” the institution is being reborn. This is not symbolic. It signals a fundamental shift: America’s military is no longer organized around perpetual “defense” against vague threats in distant lands, but around defending the homeland by preparing to fight, and win, America’s wars.

In the wake of that shift, the results are already transforming America’s security posture. With the successful capture of NicolΓ‘s Maduro and the liberation of Venezuela through Operation Southern Spear, the U.S. military has demonstrated its renewed focus, not on abstract threats abroad, but on eliminating dangers that directly threaten the American homeland.

What comes next is the National War Strategy, the first document to carry that name since World War II. Unlike every National Defense Strategy of the past three decades, it opens with a priority no previous administration placed first: Homeland Defense.

The newly released National Security Strategy (NSS) in early December 2025 marks a historic pivot, the first document since World War II to place Homeland Defense at the top of America’s priorities. Unlike the defense strategies of the past three decades, which diffused focus across global commitments, this NSS establishes a clear, disciplined sequencing of national priorities. Now guiding policy execution, it is driving the systematic dismantling of threats and denying foreign adversaries any opportunity to exploit American vulnerabilities.

This sequencing reflects the Trump national security team's core insight: We cannot deter Beijing in the Indo-Pacific while our hemisphere remains contested. A China capable of disrupting our sea lanes, propping up hostile proxies, choking energy supplies, and waging chemical warfare via fentanyl has no place in a secure America. By prioritizing homeland defense, the NSS enables us to eradicate these footholds first, allowing decisive power projection abroad without domestic distractions.

President Trump has delivered swiftly: National Guardsmen in cities, active-duty troops at the southern border, the reinstatement of Remain in Mexico, the end of catch-and-release, and tariffs that forced Mexico and Canada to seal trafficking routes. Illegal crossings have dropped over 90 percent since January 2025, mass deportations continue apace, and fentanyl precursor flows have been strangled. These measures not only safeguard communities but sever China's espionage and subversion networks, freeing our forces for Indo-Pacific focus.

The Caribbean operations against narco-terrorists backed by Maduro's regime, culminating in Operation Southern Spear's triumph—the capture of Maduro and Venezuela's liberation—prove the point. Regimes destabilizing the U.S. through conventional or irregular means face swift consequences, without the quagmire of nation-building. Iran felt this in Operation Midnight Hammer; Maduro's fall reinforces it. With Venezuela now free from socialist tyranny, the Western Hemisphere is reclaiming stability under American leadership, denying adversaries like China and Russia any regional leverage.

Second in the NSS priorities—and deliberately so—is denying Chinese Communist Party dominance in the Indo-Pacific through "Allied Autonomy." As articulated by Under Secretary of War for Policy Elbridge Colby in The Strategy of Denial, frontline allies like Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines, and Australia must be equipped to hold the First Island Chain in a conflict's early phases. U.S. submarines, long-range missiles, and bombers, based in the Second Island Chain and on the continent, will then deliver unmatched strikes. This isn't retreat, but rather credible deterrence. A homeland once porous to cartels and espionage couldn't sustain such efforts—now, with the NSS's embrace of the Trump Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, it can.

All else plays supporting roles. NATO must bear more European weight, while the Middle East is deprioritized amid stronger regional allies. The American people rejected endless wars; the Trump Administration's NSS honors that, channeling resources to what matters.

Detractors cry "isolationism,” while history will see it as renewal: the end of self-inflicted wounds in peripheral conflicts, and the dawn of preparedness for decisive victories. America First isn't rhetoric—it's the bedrock of independence, bolstering energy, manufacturing in semiconductors and steel, medicine, rare earths, and infrastructure for enduring dominance.

The NSS doesn't just rename priorities; it rearms the republic for an era of great-power competition, with Venezuela's liberation as proof of concept. America is back, unbreakable at home, unstoppable abroad.


There Is No Law in the Jungle—or in American Cities, Either, Thanks to the Democratic Party


"Barbarism, like the jungle, does not die out, but only retreats behind the barriers that civilization has thrown up against it, and waits there always to reclaim that to which civilization has temporarily laid claim."—historian Will Durant

Durant made this same point in a shorter quote, which I really like: "Civilization is an occasional and temporary retreat from the jungle." The jungle has no law. That makes it easy for predators, even the human kind. It is civilized, virtuous laws that man cannot abide for long.

I have never been in a real Amazonian-type jungle, and, being the age I am, have no real desire to go to one. But I do like to watch jungle survival movies, where 10 people go in and only two—the male and female who fall in love—come out alive. There's just still something in me that enjoys watching obnoxious, liberal Hollywood actors get eaten by snakes and crocodiles. I guess I'm not the only one who relishes it; there are plenty of such movies to be seen.

So, even though I've never been to an Amazonian-type jungle and have no desire to go to one, I think I would feel safer there than I would today in Minneapolis, Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, San Francisco, Philadelphia, and a host of other Democratic Party-run American cities. Buck Owens—do you remember him?—sang about New York City: "It ain't nothin' but a concrete jungle…" And that was about 50 years ago. Is there any civilization left in that city? Well, there won't be if Zohran Mamdani gets his way.

I'm only partly being facetious in the above paragraph. While there certainly are (I hope) some decent people remaining in America's metropolises, the jungle, the barbarians, certainly exist in those places, in huge numbers, and are increasing exponentially. Civilization is retreating, as it always does in the face of a jungle. And the jungle waits for nothing or no one.

There is a stretch of very nice flora and fauna partially surrounding the parking lot of the condo building I live in. It grew to such mammoth proportions that, a few months ago, the condo management had to cut it way back lest it overrun the whole place. "Haha," said the jungle, and now management needs to do it again. Contrary to popular (leftist) belief, the Amazon jungle will grow back a whole lot faster than farmers can cut it down.

That's because the jungle knows no law. The only law it recognizes is to grow, eat, or be eaten, take every inch you can, and don't stop for anything. Now, if that doesn't describe the current state of Tim Walz's Minneapolis, then nothing does. It's a jungle. We shouldn't be surprised. Read the Durant quotes again.

Why does the Democratic Party let this happen? And they are letting it happen; it is deliberate, there is no question about that. They want the jungle, the barbarism, to grow in America. It is all part of their eventual vision for the country. Let it be overrun by barbarians first. Later, they will do something about it.

Let me mention a couple of reasons the Democrats are letting this happen. Number one, they are just evil people. Evil people do evil things, aren't—at least in mind and spirit—civilized themselves (civilization can be partly defined as the restraint of evil), and are thus encouraging the lawlessness of the jungle in the cities and states they control. They want it to happen because they are evil. Good people stop barbarians from overrunning their places of abode. The Democrats aren't doing that for the simple reason that they are not good people. They are evil, pure, 100 percent, unadulterated evil.

But a second reason they let it happen is that it fits with their vision of what they want America to become—a country with a totalitarian government which they control. If the jungle grows and grows and grows virtually non-stop, like the Democrats are allowing, then eventually lawlessness comes to dominate, or at least, be such that good, honest, decent people who wish to live in peace and safety will want something to be done. Who can stop barbarians except government with total power?

Totalitarian governments, such as the Soviet Union and China, are very often instituted after civil wars. Most people don't want a civil war in their country; it is obviously a very dangerous and disruptive thing, and they will usually give up some or all of their freedoms to be protected against such a catastrophe. Or against barbarians. A barbarian uprising (which usually follows a barbarian invasion), as is happening now in Minneapolis and other Democratic Party-run cities, will also require force to eventually put it down. And force, not freedom, is what Democrats believe in.

Folks, the Democrats will eventually stop the barbarism in their cities. They will stop it when they are given the power to do it. They will encourage the barbarism as long as Donald Trump and American values are honored and cherished by millions of Americans. But again, eventually, good people get tired of the chaos and danger and are willing to sacrifice their freedoms for security. When they do that, they will end up with neither, but it sounds good. Give the Democrats the power the CCP has in China, and they will be happy. And they'll stop the barbarism. And stop any freedom they don't like. That's the price you pay to halt the growth of the jungle.

So, this is all deliberate for the Democrats. Encourage the growth of the jungle until they, with the total power they crave, are given the power to stop it. And, as in the USSR and PRC, all freedoms that they don't permit will cease. It's the plan, and it seems to be working.


🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Sicko Who Threatened to Blow Up JD Vance's Family at Disneyland Gets to the 'FO' Part


RedState 

Meet Marco Antonio Aguayo. We know he's twenty-two years old, and we know he's a resident of Anaheim, California.

We also know he's a sicko who threatened Vice President JD Vance and his family when they visited Disneyland while on a family vacation to California last summer. And we know this because of a criminal complaint filed Wednesday against Aguayo by the federal government, which alleges Aguayo posted to social media that pipe bombs had been placed around the amusement park ahead of the Vance family's arrival. 

Aguayo is accused of also posting this chilling message: "Good luck finding all of them on time there will be bloodshed tonight and we will bathe in the blood of corrupt politicians." These threats were allegedly posted on the Disneyland Instagram account.

Here are the three threatening messages allegedly posted by Aguayo: 

“Pipe bombs have been placed in preparation for J.D. Vance’s arrival,” the first comment read.

“It’s time for us to rise up and you will be a witness to it,” read the second.

“Good luck finding all of them on time there will be bloodshed tonight and we will bathe in the blood of corrupt politicians,” read the third.

Local law enforcement and an agent from the U.S. Secret Service visited Aguayo on July 12, 2025, to question him about the posts. He initially denied making them, using the old "my account was hacked" chestnut; he eventually admitted that he had made the posts, but forgot to delete them, as he had intended to do, before they were seen. That might be believable, but still extremely serious, had it been one post. But three? That's a deliberate threat, even if there were no pipe bombs planted in the park.

“He claimed that he intended it merely as a joke to provoke attention and laughter,” the criminal complaint says. “AGUAYO stated he contemplated deleting the post but ultimately forgot to do so.”

The complaint details how the Secret Service agent investigating the threats to the Vance family was able to track down Marco Antonio Aguayo. The agent was able to connect an email address to the Instagram account making the vile statements on the Disneyland page; Google subscriber records were then used to identify Aguayo, along with two phone numbers. The suspect consented to have his phone searched, and that leads us to the charges.

Marco Antonio Aguayo now faces a federal charge of making a threat against the president and successors to the presidency. From the criminal complaint:

For all the reasons described above, there is probable cause to believe that AGUAYO violated 18 U.S.C. § 871 (Threat against President and Successors to the Presidency).

It's not clear at this point if Marco Antonio Aguayo is in federal custody, nor if he has retained counsel.


The Left Will Never Forgive Renee Good (Or Anyone Else) For Being White


Leftism is the only ideology that demands total subjugation and will still treat you like garbage after you die for it.



Who would want to risk his life for a cause if he is still going to be an indelible racist even after giving up his life for that cause?

It could be the premise of a Monty Python sketch or a Mel Brooks movie, but it’s a question every leftist insurrectionist in Minneapolis, etc. should ask themselves.

As others have noted, the left wanted Renee Good’s death to be the second coming of George Floyd. But there were problems. There was the footage of the incident, especially from the ICE agent’s bodycam, that clearly showed him being struck by Good’s 4,000-pound Honda. There was Elon Musk’s ownership of X, which allowed actual facts to stand against leftist lies like Good was just dropping off her kids at school. And there’s the problem that Good was white.

It is this last one that is the most problematic for the left. A fellow, white, female empath admitted on camera that she felt “wrong” protesting for Good since she herself — and thus Good as well — as a white woman, had “white privilege.” “White tears are not always something that’s helpful,” she concluded. BLM holdovers took to X to wag their fingers at supposed allies who dared to give Good “Say her name!” honors, lecturing that that phrase was for black women and black women only. As Christian Heiens put it on X, leftism is the only ideology that demands total subjugation and will still treat you like garbage after you die for it.

And it is not just Good. Remember Aaron Bushnell, the 25-year-old U.S. Air Force serviceman who set himself on fire in front of the Israeli embassy because he was “no longer going to be complicit with genocide?” That should have pushed Bushnell to the heights of the left’s Olympus. Instead, The Washington Post said he was not a hero. Activists posing as intellectuals Lilliputianed Bushnell by saying, “In a way, we’re all burning. All Bushnell did was show it.” Even immolating himself for the holy cause of Palestine was not enough to forgive Bushnell of the unforgivable crime: Not only being a white man but a white man who was an active member of the American military.

Hatred Towards Whites

A few things are happening.

First and foremost, we are seeing what has been obvious for some time: the left and the Democrat Party are built on hatred towards white people. As another X user said, if Good had been killed by an illegal alien, there would be no riots; Gov. Tim Walz would not have thumped his chestless torso and suggested Minnesota was at war with the federal government; the dancing puppet mayor of Minneapolis would not have told ICE (the same ICE that deported many illegal immigrants during the Obama administration with nary a peep from the media and the usual suspects) to “get the f*** out” of his city.

Good would have taken her place with Laken Riley, Mollie Tibbett, and all the other dead women swept under the rug by the left when it is inconvenient to their “noble immigrant” narrative.

Ideas Have Consequences

Second is the truth of the old adage, “Ideas have consequences.” Starting under Obama, the left’s main strategy for power has been to create its own caste system. Minorities, and especially women of minorities, were to be at the top (who was to take the pinnacle was never quite clear, though black “trans women” were probably there.) At the bottom were white men. White women were suspect but they were still above white men because they were women. This allowed the left to put everyone into their own pigeonholes based on melanin levels and who wanted to sleep with whom.

This, in turn, gave them the leverage to do two things: create scripts tailored for each group that all said the same thing:“You are oppressed and Democrats are your only hope!” (remember in 2012 then-Vice President Joe Biden telling black Democrats that Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney wanted to “put y’all back in chains?”). This, in turn, made people easier to control. Anyone who went off script was an example of “multiracial whiteness” or proof that one was not “politically black” (i.e. a race traitor) and received immediate excommunication from the tribe.

White men, in this plan, had to prove that they were true allies to the Chosen Oppressed: Accept everything that these different pigpenned groups said without question. When necessary, protest for them. In this way, they could atone for their sin of whiteness. The left thought it could create its identitarian monster, unleash it every election cycle, and then shut off the juice in between times.

The George Floyd riots, however, were when the monster started to break loose. White people — not just men — were all racist. Racism was a biological condition of whiteness that no amount of seminars, DEI, or privilege checking could eradicate. White people were told to dismantle racism because “you invented it.” When knee bending, foot kissing, suicidal empaths then asked “How do we? I can’t see through my white privilege,” they were denigrated as racists. When white women did not turn out for Kamala Harris, the only solution was to make the United States a white minority country, a fact openly celebrated by the left.

The Left’s Precarious Position

We have now reached the point where even dying for the left’s cause can no longer atone for whiteness. Race is indelible, being white a mortal sin for which no absolution is strong enough; no blood is red enough to wash it away. This leaves the left in a precarious position. On the one hand, they still need their white, braindead, suicidal empath protestors. First, because America is still a white majority country. But also because minority status true believers are not going to put themselves on the front lines of their causes. Joy Reid said so. To the true believers, like Reid and Nikole Hannah-Jones, white people are pawns, a white cat’s paw. Get other people to do your dirty work for them. If they accomplish your goal, you’ve won without putting yourself in danger. If they fail, you can save face and (in the case of criminal charges, like impeding federal agents from enforcing federal law) you can claim innocence.

How many protesters will put this together? Video footage of the protests shows that there are still too many of these insurrectionists on the streets. But it’s easier to protest when you are being paid to do so. If the Trump administration can finally go after these networks for the criminal conspiracies that they are and cut off even half of the money, we might see an upsurge in common sense from some of these people. At the very least, we could see them finally asking themselves the question: Why am I letting myself be used as a pawn?


Rand Paul presses Congress to vote on ending refugee welfare, forcing charities to pick up tab

 

With federal programs that cost the American taxpayers billions every year, members of Congress are trying to find a remedy to tighten purse strings.

By Amanda Head for Just the News  16 Jan 2026

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who serves as chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, is drafting a transformative new bill that will return the responsibility of care for refugees to their sponsors and the charitable organizations who brought them to the United States, removing them from the tax bill of Americans. 

"They will survive the way we traditionally did. When we admitted people, if you sponsored them, they're your responsibility," Paul told Just The News.

"You have many of these church charities involved in bringing people here, and then the church charity thinks that charity involves signing them up for welfare. No. Charity is if your charity brings them here, and they can't or aren't working enough to have food, you feed them. It's charitable to give your own money. It's not charitable to take someone else's money."

Paul, along with other members of Congress in both the House and the Senate, have been sounding the alarm on a key component of welfare program eligibility, which was redefined by the Biden administration, who ushered in millions of illegal immigrants under novel parameters for eligibility.

Under U.S. law, most legal immigrants are subject to a five-year waiting period before becoming eligible for major federal means-tested public benefits like Medicaid, SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program), and TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families), but refugees and asylum-seekers are fully exempt from this bar and can access these programs immediately.

$1.6 trillion in wasteful spending identified

However, Paul argues, "What we have done is we've gone around the legal immigrant status, and we've added this whole other category of a special visa or refugee status, which is hundreds of thousands of people. Hundreds of thousands of people come in on this, and they're on welfare. It's supposed to be against the law."

Paul, who began publishing his annual Festivus Report to highlight examples of federal government waste through his "airing of grievances," has been a consistent voice opposing government waste and fraud. In the December 2025 edition, he identified approximately $1.6 trillion in wasteful spending, including funding for cocaine experiments on dogs, payments to influencers promoting COVID vaccines, and massive interest on the national debt. 

The name of the annual report was inspired by the TV show Seinfeld, in which Festivus was a humorous, anti-commercial holiday invented by Frank Costanza. 

The report harkens back to Senator William Proxmire, D-Wis., who awarded the "Golden Fleece Awards" on a monthly basis from 1975 to 1988, spotlighting what he deemed the most "wasteful, ridiculous or ironic use of the taxpayers' money," often targeting seemingly silly scientific studies. 

Paul went on to warn against other Senate Republicans who are inclined to keep the refugee funding as a part of the next federal budget. "I found out in the last couple of months that the refugee money, the $5 billion, is still in the appropriations process. In the Republican Senate, virtually every Republican senator voted to keep the refugee money in."

Paul is prepared to throw a wrench in the machine. As of now, that bill was slated to come up this week. "They delayed it because I think they heard that I'm going to bring an amendment to strip it, and so it'll still be in the money January 30. If there's 4, 5, 6 million in there, I will do whatever it takes to get an amendment vote. And usually if I threatened to slow the process up, I can get a vote," Paul said.

In an effort to get members of Congress on record, Paul cautioned, "I think all Republicans and Democrats ought to vote on whether we're going to look at Somali fraud and look the other way and just keep funneling the money to the refugee welfare programs."

"We can't take care of our own, much less admitting hundreds of 1000s of new people. So I'm following this closely."

Broad-stroke spending cuts to control waste

Examining the overarching issue of wasteful spending in Washington, Paul proposed a blanket reduction in spending that might be more palatable than previous approaches. 

"What I've proposed for everything is to balance the budget, you have to have 6% less spending," Paul told Just The News. "And what I like about doing it across the board, is everybody comes in and has a sad story like research money for Alzheimer's. I have family members with it. Everybody does. I have sympathy. We're a wealthy country. Can't we afford it?" Rand asked rhetorically. 

"And so if we spent 100 million last year. I'll say, could we spend 94 million? And you know, most of the families that come in say, well, that's not that unreasonable. We'll still be doing Alzheimer's research. We're just going to do 6% less so we don't bankrupt the country. But I think it's the same with refugee money. 6% would be the minimum."

Amanda Head is the White House Correspondent at Just The News. Follow her on X.

These Democrat States Are Declaring War on ICE



Democrats in several states are pushing for measures to limit how Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers behave during their operations.

This comes after the fatal shooting of Renee Good by an ICE agent in Minneapolis. Her death led to national protests against President Donald Trump’s mass deportation agenda, which involves aggressive immigration enforcement operations in blue cities.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul is backing a bill that would allow people to sue federal officials who violate their constitutional rights. This is already allowed for state and local officials, but not for federal officials. 

In her State of the State address, Hochul explained that the measure “doesn’t interfere with lawful enforcement or public safety,” but “affirms a core truth: Power does not justify abuse.” 

She added, “And if someone’s constitutional rights are violated here in the state of New York, I say they deserve their day in court.”

New Jersey lawmakers passed three bills aimed at limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. They would designate schools, courts, health care facilities, and churches as “sensitive locations” where people “should not be deterred from seeking services.”

Another bill would prohibit state agencies from sharing sensitive personal data with federal immigration authorities and further restrict local assistance with ICE operations.

California has already passed similar laws, and its lawmakers are advancing the No Kings Act, which enables residents to sue federal officers for violating the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments. “This bill makes one simple principle real again, that no one is above the Constitution,” said state Sen. Scott Wiener, a Democrat.

A recent YouGov/Economist poll revealed that most Americans heard about Renee Good’s shooting. About 50 percent believe the shooting was not justified, while 30 percent believe it was justified. A larger share of Americans (46 percent) support abolishing ICE, compared with 43 percent who oppose it.

The poll also revealed that 52 percent of Americans oppose how ICE carries out its operations, while only 39 percent approve.


DOJ Has Spicy Clapback After Soros-Backed Philly DA Issues Arrest Threat to ICE


RedState 

In response to the immigration enforcement operations that have taken place over the last several months, some blue state Democrats have tried to fight back by pushing for or backing laws they believe would limit the ability of ICE and the CBP to do their jobs in rounding up criminal illegal immigrants and deporting them.

We saw this, for example, in California, where a bill that was drafted by far-left Democrat state Sen. Scott Wiener, titled the "No Secret Police Act," and which is intended to "ban federal and local law enforcement, including ICE, from wearing ski masks and similar extreme masks," was signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in September.

Though the law went into effect at the beginning of 2026, it is being challenged in the courts by the DOJ on grounds that it is unconstitutional and "designed to create risk for our agents."

Democrat Attorneys General and District Attorneys are also trying to get in on the action, as we've seen with Minnesota AG Keith Ellison in his lawsuit against DHS to try and "end the unlawful, unprecedented surge of the federal law enforcement agents into Minnesota."

Soros-backed Philadelphia DA Larry Krasner also weighed in this week, vowing to arrest ICE agents and set bail very high if anything like the Renee Good incident happened in his city:

He also said that if he sees ICE operating in a fashion similar to the agent involved in the deadly Minnesota shooting, he would not hesitate to prosecute against a federal agent.

"We will arrest you. We will handcuff you. We will close those cuffs. We will put you in a cell. We will set your bail and I'm going to ask for it to be appropriately high," said Krasner. "We will take you to trial and I'm going to do everything in my power to convict you and we will make sure you serve your entire sentence because Donald Trump has no power, whatsoever, to pardon you. That's the way the law works."

I'm no legal expert, but DOJ Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche is, and he had this to say in response:

Yeah. I mean, I don't think this would go very well for the city of Philadelphia if they tried. Just sayin'.

Others also pointed out that Krasner's priorities are a bit skewed, considering he seems to be more fired up about immigration enforcement agents doing their jobs than he does alleged violent offenders in his own backyard:

Sounds about right.

I should point out that Krasner isn't the only Philly official who has taken this stance. As RedState previously reported, Philadelphia Sheriff Rochelle Bilal recently made this declaration:

Those that come into our communities wearing masks to commit crime— and thank God for our District Attorney Larry Krasner, who says he's gonna lock them up... you're getting arrested... we stand here today with all those who stand against the made-up fake, what you can call ICE.

[...]

You don't want this smoke, because we'll bring it to you. And the fake, whatever they call them because I can put... I can't say their name. But the criminal in the White House will not keep you [ICE agents] from going to jail.

Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons had a similar response to Blanche's:

I also think it might be a good idea for these Democrat officials to brush up a bit on the Supremacy Clause. Just a thought.