Supreme Court Makes It Clear. Mass Deportations Are Mandatory To Save America.

The Federalist 

A spate of rulings from the Supreme Court couldn’t be more of a mandate if they were handed down, gift-wrapped, and sealed with a kiss by God: The mass deportation of illegal aliens is legal and imperative if there’s any hope of saving this country.

One ruling declared it within the president’s authority to interpret the word “temporary” as the opposite of “permanent” with regard to migrants who have been permitted to live within the U.S. for what is understood to be a finite period. He can order their removal. (Good!) A separate ruling, on the other hand, affirmed automatic American citizenship to babies born to migrants who have illegally entered the country. (Bad!) Yet a third ruling deemed it legal for states to count voter ballots that arrive after Election Day, thus rendering the whole concept of “Election Day” void. (Very bad!)

Taken together, if the president has expansive authority to remove illegal aliens, who otherwise might just pop out a baby immediately deemed “American” (a new Democrat voter mailing in ballots on a whim), the situation is clear. Migrants need to be sent home with haste and by any means necessary.

This country cannot survive if anyone from anywhere — China, Guatemala, India, etc. — can lock themselves inside by giving birth, securing themselves citizenship and welfare entitlements, and then vote in our corrupted elections. And yes, they’re voting. That’s not up for debate.

The Supreme Court just affirmed the possibility of a person raised for essentially his whole life in Communist China becoming president of the United States. It’s criminal.

And so, the Trump administration, and every administration that succeeds it, should recognize the only way forward is to severely restrict all forms of immigration: Ban the entry of pregnant women, reduce the duration of legal residency to less than nine months, and, of course, deport as many foreigners as possible.

By extension, our primary target for removal should no longer be “the worst criminals.” It should be women. All of them. There’s not a moment too soon. If they’re actively giving birth, hurl them into Mexico. Or, if they’re not so lucky, Canada.

That’s the position the court has put us in with this series of rulings. Mass deportations or bust.

After SCOTUS Citizenship Ruling, National Security Requires A Travel Ban On CCP Nationals

The Federalist 

The Supreme Court narrowly ruled Tuesday that Chinese nationals partaking in birth tourism schemes may continue to do so and receive citizenship for their babies, making it imperative that President Donald Trump implement a complete ban on travel from China.

The high court held that “children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause.”

But as Justice Samuel Alito wrote in his dissent, “The Court’s interpretation also has national-security implications.”

“Suppose that a person’s only connection to this country is that he was born here to a mother who was present just long enough to give birth and then quickly returned to her native country. Suppose that country is a strategic adversary or enemy of the United States. Suppose the child never visited the United States while growing up and was inculcated with hatred of this country. According to the Court, that person is a citizen of the United States. He can enter and leave the country as he pleases. He can travel the world on a United States passport. Even if he plots to harm this country, he cannot be deprived of his status as a citizen, at least under current precedent.”

Alito’s warning isn’t some far-fetched concern, either.

There are active Chinese birth tourism scams going on in the United States. For example, the Have My Baby in Miami clinic (whose website has now been taken down) is a business that allows foreign nationals using temporary visitor visas to travel to the country to give birth and make a paperwork American. Republicans in Congress are investigating the birth tourism schemes. But even if these clinics are shut down, it doesn’t mean Chinese nationals can’t just conspire on their own and time their trip to the United States around their due date.

And the risk of allowing foreign nationals from a hostile country to have a paperwork American baby is far too great. 

In recent years we’ve seen how the Chinese Communist Party has utilized our lax immigration rules to send spies and nationals determined to undermine our national security. Chinese nationals have been charged for conspiring to smuggle biological materials into the U.S. and voting illegally in our elections, while other Chinese nationals have been buying land near sensitive military sites.

There is also the case of Eileen Gu. Gu was born in San Francisco to Chinese parents who were government officials. She was raised in America, but when the chance came, she competed for China in the Olympics.

While these persons may not have all benefited from birthplace citizenship, they highlight the real risk of giving birthright citizenship to persons from a country openly hostile to the United States with active campaigns to sabotage our national security.

At a time when the Chinese Communist Party is engaging in aggressive espionage campaigns, billions in intellectual property theft, and other operations intended to undermine the United States, the president now has no choice but to close off any avenues for exploitation of our Constitution, especially when these concerns are justified.

SCOTUS Says The US Civil War Was Basically About Protecting ChiCom Birth Tourists

The Supreme Court ruled the Civil War was fought so that Chinese nationals who have set up birth tourism companies in the US could have anchor babies.

The Federalist 

The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that the Civil War was apparently fought so that illegal aliens and Chinese nationals who have set up birth tourism companies in the United States could have anchor babies.

The Supreme Court held that “Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause.” Four of the justices agreed that the 14th Amendment does not confer automatic citizenship.

In justifying their decision, the high court argued the ruling is rooted in the Civil War itself. According to the Court’s historical account (which was rebuked by Justice Clarence Thomas), one of the greatest achievements of the generation that fought the Civil War and created the 14th Amendment was to permit millions of foreign nationals to come here, drop a baby out, and have that child become “American.”

“In the midst of the Civil War, Attorney General Edward Bates issued a landmark opinion citing key authorities, including Calvin’s Case and Kent’s Commentaries, rejecting the premise that ‘citizenship is ever hereditary,’ and declaring that ‘every person born in the country is, at the moment of birth, prima facie a citizen, . . . without any reference to race or color,'” the Court wrote. The opinion then tied that to Reconstruction.

“A year after General Lee’s surrender at Appomattox, Congress sought to turn Bates’s opinion into law. The result was the Civil Rights Act of 1866… What the Civil Rights Act began, the Fourteenth Amendment, and its reputation of Dred Scott, would finish.”

According to the narrow majority, Congress sought “to put the ‘great question of citizenship’ ‘beyond the legislative power’ altogether, to settle the issue once and for all.”

“The Fourteenth Amendment achieved its aim,” the court held, as if the “aim” of the 14th Amendment was ever to guarantee that illegal aliens or foreign nationals who set up birth tourism schemes could have “American” babies. “The Citizenship Clause mirrored the common law’s criteria for citizenship, starting with territory ( a child must be ‘born … in the United States’) and ending with sovereign power (a child must be ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States). A child born on American soil and subject to American law was made an American citizen.”

It’s a ludicrous assertion that now legitimizes the scams being run by the Chinese, for example. Take Chinese billionaire Xu Bo, who has reportedly fathered more than 100 children — possibly more — through surrogacy agencies in the United States. Xu himself has never lived in the United States. But, as a result of the twisted logic that was codified by the high court, his children are citizens and can run for president one day. But Xu isn’t the only Chinese national purposely having children in the United States. Take the Have My Baby in Miami clinic, which is a business that allows foreign nationals using temporary visitor visas to travel to the country to give birth and make a paperwork American. Republicans in Congress are investigating the birth tourism schemes.

But as Thomas wrote in his dissent, “the Court’s account is not historically accurate.”

Thomas points out that the Court twisted an amendment “designed and understood to secure equal rights for the freed blacks” for “political projects that the Reconstruction Congress did not support.”

As The Federalist’s CEO and co-founder Sean Davis said on X: “The Roberts/Barrett take on the 14th is entirely inconsistent with actual history, language, and common sense. They’re not actually stupid enough to believe it. Which means this entire decision was driven by their own cowardice and craven desire to be liked.”