Saturday, January 31, 2026

Fascism in America, 2026


As happens with regularity, Leftists accuse the Right of committing crimes that Leftists themselves have actually committed. In practice, it's a dead giveaway: When they accuse those on the Right of a crime, the Left has already committed that crime repeatedly.

Antifa insurrectionists, notably orchestrated and compensated in Minneapolis, are a stunning case in point. Antifa, short for 'anti-fascist,' is actually among the most fascist groups in the world and now, appropriately, designated as a domestic terrorist organization.

As Old as the Romans

The concept of fascism dates back to the Romans, long before Hitler and Mussolini. Originally, “fasces,” referring to a bundle of weeds or wooden rods tied together, with an ax blade attached, was the symbol of unity and strength. It signified that all aspects of political control were under the auspices of one supreme leader.

In a fascist state, the people don't rule, vote, or choose representatives. Fascism is the antithesis of democracy; everything is under the control of an autocrat. When a Fascist government takes control, its people lose their freedom and those who don't capitulate are dealt with harshly. They are either murdered, beaten, robbed, canceled, re-educated, or otherwise shunned in society.

Today, the internet giants from Google to Wikipedia endlessly gaslight that fascism is a far-right development, while ignoring the reality that Antifa represents the essence of fascism. Antifa fascists have no regard for the rule of law, one vote per citizen, fair elections, or civil obedience. Fascists disregard legal rulings and take the law into their own hands. They do whatever they can to ensure that elections either are contorted to favor their candidate or not held at all.

Antifa members believe, in essence, that they are the law, morally and otherwise. They engage in acts of sabotage and violence to create anarchy and mayhem so that law-abiding citizens are coerced into giving up freedoms for enhanced security.

You and I Have No Rights

In America today, and around the world, Antifa vehemently opposes individual rights. They prefer censorship or physical harm in dealing with anybody who has views opposing theirs. Groups that are or even seem in conflict with their way of viewing the world are denied free speech, the right to assembly, the right to petition, the right to a free press, and many other rights that we routinely enjoy in America.

Antifa has little, if any, regard for personal property. They'll pull down statues. They will burn down or bomb what stands in their way as surely as they pick their own noses. As in Minneapolis, they’ll disrupt church services. They do not support religious freedom. They'll desecrate memorials and destroyreligious places of worship such as churches and synagogues, although they seem to tiptoe around Muslims.

Fascists, as typified by Antifa, prefer to operate in a cancel culture where they literally ruin the careers of others with whom they disagree. Antifa's worldview is that everyone must submit to their will. They are vigilant supporters of big government control – as long as such governments strictly enforce Leftist edicts.

No Mirrors Available

When Antifa blames those on the right, including President Trump, Congress, judges, governors, etc., for being fascists, they ought to hold a mirror up to themselves. Fascists are not for individual rights, industry deregulation, tax cuts, or school choice.

Not always, but Antifa members typically are cowards. They'll usually approach a large gathering and wait to strike. Then, they'll attack older adults, the weak, and the frail, and batter them without mercy, as has happened in Seattle, Portland, Berkeley, Los Angeles, and many other cities.

Antifa members tend to be disgruntled, low-achieving, underemployed males, often led by professors or those on the Left who otherwise show some inkling of intellectual capacity. Many in the Antifa rank-and-file don't fully comprehend why they riot, loot, and incite violence. They have vague notions that their actions are beneficial for the society that they seek to 'reform.' They are roused by utopian ideals of global government, which will magically improve the lives of everyone on Earth.

Lurkers Galore

Why don't Antifa members form a political party, headed by leaders who speak openly on political talk shows? Certainly, CNN and MSNOW would host them and, heck, likely give them considerable air time if not their own regularly scheduled show.

If they're committed to their cause and proud of what they do, why do they wear masks? Why do they creep around incognito? Why, exactly, do they slither in the dark? We can all guess the answers.

Frankly, Antifa members are an entirely fascist lot and detrimental to any society in which they dwell.


Podcast thread for Jan 31

 


Maybe next month won't be such a challenge.

The St. Paul Mob That Attacked Cities Church Is Just the Start If Not Heavily Punished


January 6, 2021, was used as a predicate for the egregious lawfare that the Biden administration waged against many on the political Right for four years. The administration seemed to gleefully throw the book at anyone it could drum up charges against – some for simply being in Washington, D.C., or near the Capitol grounds on that day. In the process, it violated constitutional rights and ruined lives.

Sunday, January 18, 2026, should eclipse the “infamy” of those Capitol protests for most Americans. That’s the day a mob forcefully entered, disrupted, and obstructed the peaceful worship service of Christians at the Cities Church in St. Paul, Minnesota.

After four years of the Biden administration’s giving the back of its hand to Christianity, these emboldened bad actors, who dislike nothing more than peaceful Christian families attending Sunday services, stormed the church. Led by radical activists such as Nekima Levy Armstrong, Chauntyll Louisa Allen, and William Kelly (along with their publicist, the ridiculous Don Lemon), this mob forced its way into the Church mid-service and disrupted the Christian families who were at worship. All three “activists” and Lemon were arrested and will be facing federal criminal charges.

Why did they do it? These activists were convinced that one of the head pastors of the church was the acting director of the local U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office, as if that would somehow make it permissible. The congregation showed remarkable resilience and patience in the face of an evil that Americans should never have to face in their own country.

And these same leftists want you to think January 6 was bad? January 6 was, at least until some got violent and damaged federal property, a proper protest. Demonstrators had legitimate constitutional concerns about the outcome of an election. But January 18, 2026, was worse: it sent a message to Christians that their houses of worship are no longer safe. The same people who loudly fret about “our democracy” don’t seem to value our constitutional rights.

This obstruction of peaceful worship potentially violated federal laws that defend Americans engaging in their First Amendment right to worship. The Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, legislation signed by former President Clinton, prohibits the physical obstruction, use of force, and threats of force to cause intentional injury to someone, intimidate them, or attempt to interfere with someone’s access to houses of worship.

This law, which was originally intended to shield abortion facilities, also further enshrines our First Amendment right to freedom of religion. Besides the assault on this church being unnecessary and irrational, it was an atrocious display of emboldened anti-Christian sentiment by people who want society to bend the knee to their radical views. Armstrong, Allen, Kelly, and their co-conspirators’ actions appear to have been premeditated (with former “journalist” Lemon in tow), and their rush to social media to justify the outburst reveals the mob’s direct intention to sow chaos and intimidate worshippers. Aggressive prosecution against this mob by the DOJ under Attorney General Bondi’s leadership is exactly what we need, and based upon everything that has happened thus far in the investigation, I am confident we will get it.

To radicals like this, the end justifies the means. Now is the time for decisive action. Americans must stand up to those who wish to disrupt, harm, or otherwise obstruct peaceful worship in America. Every single “activist” in that church needs to be federally prosecuted to the fullest extent imaginable. There is no end worthy of these means. This type of infamous conduct needs to be stopped in its tracks, and I’m confident the Trump administration will not stand for it and do everything in its power to punish it.

Accountability is coming.


The Blind Rage Of Anti-ICE Protests: Delusional Activism In The Age Of Enforcement

Leftists’ irrational fury renders them incapable of processing facts, videos, or evidence, making rational dialogue impossible as their hatred overrides any capacity for truth or reason.


In recent weeks, protests against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations have escalated across the country, particularly in Minneapolis, where mass deportations under President Donald Trump’s second administration have ignited widespread unrest. What began as demonstrations against what protesters call “inhumane” immigration policies has devolved, in many instances, into violent clashes with federal agents. Critics argue these actions stem from a deep-seated delusion, fueled by “Trump Derangement Syndrome” (TDS)—a term describing an irrational hatred of Trump and his policies that blinds participants to facts, evidence, and reason.

Protesters, often portrayed by sympathetic media as peaceful advocates for justice, are accused of shielding criminal illegal immigrants, including rapists, pedophiles, and murderers, while following cues from Democrat leaders to obstruct lawful enforcement. This article examines key incidents highlighting this alleged disconnect from reality, drawing on eyewitness accounts, video evidence, and official reports to underscore how blind rage has overtaken rational discourse.

The Renee Good Incident: A “Mom” or a Menace?

One flashpoint is the January 7, 2026, shooting of Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old U.S. citizen and mother of three, by ICE agent Jonathan Ross in Minneapolis. According to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Good “weaponized her vehicle” in an attempt to run over the officer, an act described as “domestic terrorism.” Video footage shows Good’s car lurching forward, followed by Ross firing three shots. Officials maintain she endangered the agent, who suffered internal bleeding and required hospitalization, but Good’s supporters, however, paint her as an innocent bystander who had just dropped off her child at daycare, intervening to protect immigrant neighbors from deportation.

This narrative divide exemplifies the delusion at play. Eyewitnesses and federal accounts describe Good laughing defiantly as she accelerated toward the agent, yet left-leaning voices ignore this, focusing instead on her role as a caring mother and poet. Even video evidence, which some outlets claim shows her turning away, is dismissed by skeptics as inconclusive amid the chaos of the scene. The result? Protesters rally around a sanitized version of events, unable to reconcile facts with their rage against ICE’s mission to remove threats from communities.

Alex Pretti: Nurse or Armed Agitator?

The January 24, 2026, killing of Alex Jeffrey Pretti, a 37-year-old former ICU nurse at a Veterans Affairs hospital, has further inflamed tensions. Pretti was fatally shot by Border Patrol agents during a confrontation in Minneapolis, amid protests against “Operation Metro Surge,” Trump’s intensified deportation campaign. Officials, including White House advisor Stephen Miller, labeled him an “assassin” who “tried to murder federal agents,” citing his possession of a fully loaded 9mm handgun and aggressive behavior.

Days earlier, video allegedly showed Pretti spitting on agents, kicking out a taillight on a government vehicle, and resisting detention, resulting in a bruised rib for one officer. Detained briefly for destruction of property and assault, Pretti returned armed to another protest site, escalating what critics call a pattern of provocation. His defenders, however, hail him as a heroic RN “hunted down” by ICE while en route to save lives, ignoring the fight he initiated and the weapon he brandished. This selective vision—elevating his profession to “self-righteous high ground,” akin to the hero worship of union teachers during COVID—blinds activists to the reality: Pretti’s actions justified heightened caution from agents, turning a routine operation into a deadly standoff.

Video breakdowns reveal agents pepper-spraying, tackling, and disarming Pretti before shots were fired, yet protesters decry it as an execution of an unarmed man. Such denial fuels the cycle of rage, where facts are twisted to fit an anti-enforcement narrative. 

Lexie Lawler: Free Speech or Fired for Fury?

Beyond the streets, the delusion extends to online activism, as seen in the case of Alexis “Lexie” Lawler, a Florida labor and delivery nurse fired from Baptist Health Boca Raton Regional Hospital. In a viral TikTok, Lawler wished a “fourth-degree tear” on pregnant White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, hoping she would “rip from bow to stern and never sh*t normally again.” Florida Surgeon General, Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo, issued an emergency suspension of her nursing license.

Lawler’s supporters frame her as a “freedom fighter” punished for political speech, launching GoFundMe campaigns and decrying retaliation. Yet, her words weren’t mere dissent—they were graphic threats of harm, far from protected expression. This mirrors the broader TDS phenomenon: edgy, violent rhetoric is recast as heroic resistance, even as it crosses into lunacy. Lawler herself dismissed backlash in profanity-laced rants, tying her firing to unrelated events like the Minneapolis shootings. Unable to see the truth, her allies elevate her to martyr status, ignoring how such vitriol erodes professional integrity.

Vigilantes and Democrat Directives: A Coordinated Assault?

These incidents aren’t isolated; they’re part of a pattern where highly organized vigilantes interfere with ICE to protect criminal elements. DHS reports a staggering 1,300% increase in assaults on officers, a 3,200% surge in vehicular attacks, and an 8,000% rise in death threats since Trump’s inauguration. Protesters block vehicles, throw projectiles, and even bite agents—acts DHS attributes to “radical rhetoric” from sanctuary politicians. In Minneapolis, crowds have used tear gas and flash bangs against federal forces, turning protests violent.

Democrat leaders are accused of stoking this fire. Figures like Rep. Ilhan Omar call for abolishing ICE as the “bare minimum,” while former President Barack Obama praises “peaceful” protests that often aren’t. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey have resisted cooperation, with Frey refusing database access amid welfare fraud probes. Critics argue this amounts to orders to “interfere, intervene, obstruct, and physically resist,” shielding criminals under the guise of compassion.

X posts reveal the grassroots fury: Users decry masked ICE agents as threats while ignoring protester violence, and some celebrate agitators as heroes. Yet, as ICE Director Tom Homan vows to stay until “the problem is gone,” deportations continue unabated.

Breaking the Cycle: Facts Over Fury

Attempts to reason with these protesters often fail; irrefutable videos and reports are dismissed as “lies.” This isn’t activism—it’s delusion, where rage eclipses reality. As DHS notes, such interference endangers agents and communities alike. Until protesters confront the facts—that ICE targets threats, not innocents—the cycle of violence will persist. In an era of renewed enforcement, blind hatred serves no one but the criminals it protects.


🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Investigators Can’t Find Tapes Showing Fulton County’s 2020 Ballot Count Started At Zero, Board Says


A member of the State Election Board revealed that the ‘tapes’ used to verify that ballot counters started their counts at zero may be missing.



A 2020 election scandal in Fulton County, Georgia’s most populous county, continues to grow with new details revealed in a State Election Board (SEB) meeting last Wednesday — and now, a week later, with an FBI raid seeking election documents from the county. 

Fulton County was notoriously plagued with issues like long lines and voting machine malfunctions in the 2020 primary election, problems The New York Times described as “a full-scale meltdown.” The problems continued through November’s Election Day and beyond, prompting concerns about votes being counted without proper supervision, among other things. The county’s repeated failures in 2020 so degraded trust in Fulton County’s ability to administer elections that the election director was forced to resign.

Now, members of the State Election Board have raised new concerns about the county’s administration of the 2020 election, revealing in last week’s meeting that the “tapes” used to verify that ballot counters started their counts at zero may be missing.

When a ballot scanner is used to count ballots, election officials must start the process by printing and signing a “zero tape,” which confirms the count started at zero. After counting ballots on the ballot scanner, officials must print and sign a closing tape, which confirms the final vote tally from that machine. In December, an attorney for Fulton County admitted that the county failed to sign off on more than 100 “tabulator tapes” — equivalent to about 315,000 votes — from early voting in the 2020 election. That admission was prompted by a complaint that was investigated by Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s office.

But in the course of investigating that complaint about the “closing tapes,” state investigators also looked for the “zero tapes,” and were unable to find any from Fulton County’s early voting period in the 2020 general election, SEB member Jan Johnston said during the board meeting. 

“The zero tape is like the beginning of a trip odometer,” Johnston explained. “You’re gonna take a trip, you’re gonna open the polls, and you set your trip odometer to zero. You look in the ballot box, and there are no ballots in the ballot box. That’s the open zero tape. You have the election, and at the end of the day, you print out a closing tape. That is the end of the trip odometer.”

The “zero tape” also helps ensure that there are no previous ballots left on the tabulator, such as votes from a previous election or a test run, that could be counted. It helps avoid situations like one that happened in a primary election in Montana in 2024, when officials discovered more votes were counted than voters physically cast. The county clerk said she believed the votes were leftover sample data that had not been cleared.

Fulton County’s admission in December came in response to a 2022 complaint by election integrity activist David Cross. Raffensperger’s office investigated the complaint, but did not present the completed investigation to the board until October, Johnston said during the meeting.

While reviewing the investigators’ report, the board became concerned that the investigators apparently were unable to find any of Fulton County’s 148 early voting “zero tapes.”

To the board’s knowledge, Fulton County turned over “zero signed or unsigned opening tapes” from early voting, Johnston said last week.

Part of the problem is a lack of clarity on whom Fulton County was supposed to deliver the original “zero tapes” to during the 2020 election. Some members of the board are under the impression that the “zero tapes” should have been delivered to the secretary of state, but Georgia regulations are unclear.

According to Johnston, the secretary of state’s investigators even “sought the zero tapes from the secretary of state’s office” — where there would presumably be a paper trail if the office had ever received them from Fulton County — but the secretary of state’s office was “unable to produce” them.

The Federalist asked Raffensperger’s office if Fulton County ever gave his office the “zero tapes” from early voting, either at the time of the 2020 election or later in response to the Secretary of State’s investigation. A spokesman for Raffensperger said he was “not finding anything even close to” a requirement that Fulton County send the “zero tapes” to the secretary of state’s office as part of the normal election administration process, but did not respond to follow-up inquiries about whether the county sent them or not. 

The regulation governing early voting says election workers shall attach the zero tape to a form that “shall be returned to the election superintendent at the close of the advance voting period.” (In Fulton County, the Fulton County Elections Board operates as the elections superintendent.) But the forms used in 2020, which are designed to be used with carbonless paper to create multiple copies in various coded colors, instruct election workers to “attach zero tapes.” 

“You Are Making Three Copies,” the form instructs. “WHITE sheet to Secretary of State … PINK sheet to Clerk of Superior Court/City Clerk … YELLOW sheet to Superintendent … GOLDENROD sheet to Registrar.”

Image Credit2020 Poll Worker Manual

The Federalist asked Nadine Williams, the Fulton County elections director who chairs the Fulton County Elections Board, whether the county possesses any or all of the “zero tapes” from early voting or whether the county ever provided the secretary of state or his investigators with those “zero tapes,” either in November 2020 or since then. Fulton County acknowledged receipt of The Federalist’s comment request and promised to “provide an update if one becomes available” but did not answer the question. The Federalist also reached out to the clerk of Fulton County Superior Court to ask whether the Superior Court received the tapes, but did not receive a response.

State law only requires the secretary of state to retain election documents for 24 months past the election, and local governments only retain “records related to the process of computing, tallying, and canvassing the vote” for two years, according to the Georgia Archives.

But, as Johnston noted in last week’s meeting, the complaint was submitted in early 2022, “well within the 24-month period.”

On Wednesday, a week after the SEB meeting, the FBI executed a search warrant at the Fulton County election office. According to election attorney Cleta Mitchell, the search warrant included “zero tapes” from the 2020 general election.

Meanwhile, the board is left with few answers. It’s unclear whether the tapes ever made it out of Fulton County, if they were signed, or even if they exist at all. If they do exist, they may have been handled properly but thrown away in the years since 2020. They could even still be filed away somewhere, where investigators have been unable to track them down. No one seems able to provide a paper trail.


Senate Intelligence Committee Demand Answers About DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s Ongoing Reviews of Govt Activity



Apparently, the Senate and House intelligence committees are very concerned about what Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is doing. Almost every tweet from Senator Mark Warner in the past 48 hours has been about DNI Tulsi Gabbard.

What seems to worry them the most is that they don’t know exactly what she is doing.  Triggered by Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) Vice-Chairman Mark Warner, the Democrats are now demanding Director Gabbard tell them her intentions and her itinerary so they can monitor her activity.  Tulsi Gabbard continues to review internal government activity without consulting them.

[SOURCE]

“Director Gabbard recognizes that election security is essential for the integrity of our republic and our nation’s security. As DNI, she has a vital role in identifying vulnerabilities in our critical infrastructure and protecting against exploitation,” a DNI spokesperson noted. “We know through intelligence and public reporting that electronic voting systems have been and are vulnerable to exploitation. President Trump’s directive to secure our elections was clear, and DNI Gabbard has and will continue to take actions within her authorities, alongside our interagency partners, to support ensuring the integrity of our elections,” the DNI spokesperson said.

Thursday evening while attending the premier of ‘Melania’ at the Kennedy Center, President Trump said, “you’re going to see some interesting things happening. They’ve been trying to get there for a long time.”

According to the Wall Street Journal:

[…] “[Tulsi Gabbard] has begun studying information about voting machines, analyzed data from swing states and pursued theories that President Trump has promoted to claim the 2020 election was unfairly taken from him, the officials said, particularly on foreign government interference.

She has regularly briefed Trump and chief of staff Susie Wiles about her inquiry in recent months along with others involved in the investigation. Those include senior Justice Department officials, Trump’s outside ally and lawyer Cleta Mitchell and Kurt Olsen, a lawyer who pushed claims in 2020 that the election was stolen and joined the administration as a special government employee.

Gabbard has consulted with others in the intelligence community about claims of foreign interference in the 2020 election, the officials said, though she hasn’t provided the public with new evidence of it.

She is expected to prepare a report on her work, the people said. The administration has discussed executive orders on voting ahead of the midterm elections, two of the officials said. 

[…] Democrats criticized Gabbard’s election effort. “Either Director Gabbard believes there was a legitimate foreign intelligence nexus—in which case she is in clear violation of her obligation under the law to keep the intelligence committees ‘fully and currently informed’ of relevant national security concerns—or she is once again demonstrating her utter lack of fitness for the office,” said Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the intelligence committee. (more – paywall)

There are a lot of interconnected aspects to all of this, many circle around the Intelligence Community’s prior and current involvement in various operations against the interests of the Office of the President.

As noted by Paul Sperry: “In a letter, ex-CIA chief John Brennan’s lawyer said his client has “complied” w/ a fed grand jury subpoena seeking, among other things, materials related to his role in creation of the Obama-ordered ICA on Russia + Trump covering the period from July 1, 2016 to Feb 28, 2017.” 

Most people are not aware how the 2016/2017 CIA work product known as the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) ties directly into the 2019 impeachment effort against President Trump for the Ukraine phone call with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

A key architect of the 2017 ICA was a CIA analyst on Russian issues named Eric Ciaramella. The anonymous CIA whistleblower who facilitated the 2019 impeachment effort was the same Eric Ciaramella.

DNI Tulsi Gabbard previously released information showing how the 2017 ICA was fraudulently constructed, and now DNI Gabbard has reviewed the transcribed testimony of former Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson, where he described how he gained authority to change the CIA rules to permit Ciaramella to remain anonymous in 2019.  All of this ties together.

[VIA Politico] – […] Sen. Mark Warner, (D-Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, argued on X Wednesday that there “are only two explanations” for Gabbard’s presence in the raid.

“Either Director Gabbard believes there was a legitimate foreign intelligence nexus — in which case she is in clear violation of her obligation under the law to keep the intelligence committees ‘fully and currently informed’ of relevant national security concerns — or she is once again demonstrating her utter lack of fitness for the office that she holds by injecting the nonpartisan intelligence community she is supposed to be leading into a domestic political stunt designed to legitimize conspiracy theories that undermine our democracy,” he wrote.

Warner and House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.) wrote to Gabbard Thursday to request briefings for both panels about the legal basis, scope, and justification of her participation in the raid. (more)

DNI Tulsi Gabbard continues to work on behalf of the American people; that seems to have triggered Senator Mark Warner.

The need for control is a reaction to fear.


ps. We have not heard much about the 2026 FISA-702 reauthorization, yet.


Boss Mode: Trump Delivers Priceless Response to Tim Walz on His 'Fort Sumter' Comments


RedState 

reported earlier on Friday about how Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz had made comments in an interview on Thursday with The Atlantic; it may have been his craziest yet in terms of his anti-ICE/anti-Trump mania. As RedState wrote, "This interview with The Atlantic is after he had spoken to Trump and Homan." 

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz worries that the violence in his state could produce a national rupture. “I mean, is this a Fort Sumter?” he mused today in an interview in his office at the state capitol. The island fortification near Charleston, South Carolina, is where Confederate forces fired the first shots of the Civil War in 1861. Now it’s federal forces that are risking a breach. “It’s a physical assault,” Walz told me. “It’s an armed force that’s assaulting, that’s killing my constituents, my citizens.”

He let his question about Fort Sumter hang without an answer.

He was dropping comparisons to the Civil War. Was he comparing himself to the Confederacy? Seriously, Tim? Then, to suggest the government is just shooting up his citizens is just peak delusion. He even mentioned John Brown and Harpers Ferry. 

Walz even spread an election conspiracy. 

Walz won’t be on the ballot in November’s election, but he thinks the contest is at the heart of the administration’s tactics. The Justice Department’s demand for Minnesota’s voter rolls, he said, was the giveaway. The president’s party, he predicted, will be “wiped out” in a free and fair vote—assuming there is one.

“But I hear Americans on this,” he added. What they say is, “‘What makes you think we can get to November?’”

Reporters asked President Donald Trump about Walz's comments at the White House on Friday. 

"Wow. Does he know what Fort Sumter was?" Trump asked. "Or do you think somebody wrote it out for him?" He went on to say that he was elected on law and order, and that was what all of this was about. 

That's a hilarious takedown of Walz. But it's true, Walz is not very bright. 

Does Tim know what happened in that scenario? Maybe that's not what he wants to be implying or inciting. Yet he's already shown he wants to keep ratcheting up the temperature when he makes Civil War references.

Tim knows he's in big trouble, between the massive fraud and the chaos he's helped to incite with the anti-ICE people. If he or they go full Civil War, it would not end well for them. They're already treading all over the insurrection line at this point; he shouldn't want to be trying to confirm that. 

I suspect that the next contact they have is not going to be pleasant for Walz. The WH and Congress need to hold the line and hold his feet to the fire when it comes to cooperation with ICE.