Wednesday, December 17, 2025

Fiat Currency and Declining Births


The fundamental problems of our society can largely be traced back to the collapse of reproduction rates. These are a symptom of dysfunction in the machinery of the social factory. People are losing faith in the future.

The dramatic decline in birthrates is no longer exclusively a Western phenomenon. China, long the epitome of demographic dynamism, has been in an open contraction process for about a year. The consequences are visible wherever political and social systems have been designed for steadily growing populations alongside rising economic productivity.

We know this problem from Germany. For the first time, German society faces severe distribution conflicts and social struggles in its pay-as-you-go pension system as well as in healthcare provision for a rapidly aging population. The demographic foundation on which the welfare state was built is beginning to crumble. With its unprecedentedly naive immigration policy, the political class is operating like a dynamo, accelerating this development.

Much speculation surrounds the causes of this population decline. A valid point refers to the introduction of the contraceptive pill as a symbol of female emancipation -- a medical-scientific intervention in reproduction rates that delivered a massive shock to 20th-century societies, still reverberating today.

The Eternal Reach into the Political Attic

To counter these trends, modern politics has devised a whole arsenal of monetary incentives: child allowances, tax incentives for marriage, joint taxation for couples, supplemented by a bouquet of state incentives. Yet all these measures have largely failed. Birth rates could not be sustainably stabilized, let alone increased.

A small anecdote illustrates how history repeats itself -- at least in the sense that societies in demographic crises always fall back on the same reaction patterns. During the reign of Emperor Augustus, a decline in the Italian core population was met with a mix of monetary incentives for young parents and draconian tax penalties for childless members of the senatorial class. Neither had any noticeable effect.

It is remarkable -- and sobering -- how persistently humans and political systems reproduce failed options, even when their failure is historically documented and empirically evident.

The Chinese example seems almost comical. During the population boom in the Middle Kingdom, a strict, heavily sanctioned one-child policy prevailed. Yet the population still grew -- and with the now visible collapse of reproduction rates, Chinese leadership today follows the Western democratic model: offering child allowances while kindergartens visibly empty.

China is expected to lose about 20 percent of its population over the next 30 years.

There is no doubt this will have consequences for the global economy. Societies react reflexively to such developments. China responds with aggressive subsidies for its export engine to counter these domestic distortions, which primarily manifest economically as deflationary pressures.

Demographics, Intervention, and the Loss of the Generational Bond

Adjusting an economy to a shrinking population becomes increasingly difficult the higher the degree of political intervention. This is a central problem – not just for China, but also for Germany and Europe at large.

On a global scale, the population is expected to reach its peak in about ten years, around 9.7 billion. Currently, about 8.2 billion people live on the planet. Regions like China and Europe are already in a demographic downward spiral, while India and large parts of Africa continue to grow dynamically. This asynchrony exerts significant migration pressure on regions like Europe -- leading to culturally consequential misjudgments, such as the EU’s planned relocation of millions of culturally foreign people to the continent.

Germany’s transformation into a kind of global welfare office has created a unique demographic situation. If open-border policies continue, the German population may even grow further in the coming years. Whether this is cause for celebration is debatable, given the state of German society.

But what has really happened here? The welfare state gradually transferred the responsibility for securing old age from the individual and their family to the institution itself. In the past, one’s old age was secured by children; today, the state assumes this role -- financed by contributions from those still working. This increasingly dissolves the intergenerational bond between parents and children, both emotionally and economically -- a kind of causal decoupling.

The emotional loss of family significance is difficult to overstate. The necessity for large families has disappeared.

The Fiat Money Shock

Examining demographic developments presents one of the most complex social structures imaginable. Remarkably, one central factor is consistently ignored:  the monetary system under which these developments occur -- the end of the gold standard.

By closing the so-called gold window in 1971, U.S. President Richard Nixon ended the dollar’s convertibility into a fixed gold equivalent -- marking the transition into the era of fiat credit money.

Money was no longer tied to real scarcity but could be politically manipulated through deficit policies and expanded through credit processes on an unprecedented scale. Credit became money; credit products like government bonds formed the foundation of the global monetary system.

This decoupling had far-reaching consequences. States effectively subordinated their central banks, using them to finance permanent deficits -- a policy that, as we can observe in Germany today, eventually spirals out of control. It is an attempt to pull future purchasing power into the present, creating fiscal and economic leeway. A classic Keynesian maneuver that leaves nothing but debt, asset bubbles, and inflation.

The consequences of this nearly unbacked credit creation, especially in private banking, are visible in asset price development since the beginning of this era. Real estate shifted from consumer goods to financial instruments, quasi-piggy banks in the battle against systemic money devaluation.

Today, for young families, purchasing a home without plunging into massive debt is nearly impossible. Dual-income households have become a prerequisite. The focus on child-rearing has not only been socially devalued amid waves of feminism but is now also practically impossible for many economically.

In a credit-driven economy, life becomes a scarce resource. Two incomes are required to close the wealth gap with owners and heirs. Children inevitably compete with career, income, and private retirement planning.

It is a fatal dysfunction of the social factory, whose incentive structure should ideally produce at least enough children to stabilize the population.

A return to sound money could be the key to an economic and social turnaround, which also lies ahead for German society at the end of its decline.

It would simultaneously end the postmodern hyperstate, which, through credit manipulation, deeply interferes with individuals’ economic dispositions. With sound money and technological progress, people could gain purchasing power through disciplined saving -- translated into time. Time they could devote to their families, projecting themselves into the future with confidence under stable monetary processes.



Entertainment and podcast thread for Dec 17

 


When your going through issues with adulthood, it's always good to have friends in your corner to talk to.

The Global Jenga Collapse: How the Third World is unmaking the First


There is a moment in every collapsing civilization when the people search for a single explanation—a master key, a hidden lever, a conspiracy that ties all the loose threads into one terrible braid. It is not madness; it is instinct. When the world falls apart, the mind demands pattern. And in our time, a new pattern is emerging, whispered at first, then spoken, now nearly shouted: the Third World is disassembling the First.

Not through armies.

Not through invasions.

Not through ideology.

But through the slow, deliberate removal of the Jenga blocks that held the modern world together.

The old working-class uprisings—the automobile strikes of mid-century America, the miner strikes of Thatcher’s Britain—were battles over wages, dignity, and power. They were about the worker demanding his place at the table. But the disruption now unfolding is something altogether different. It is civilizational. It is global. And it does not announce itself with picket lines or union chants. It operates in silence, across borders, through migration flows, through supply chains, through demographic inversion, through the quiet erosion of institutional capacity.

While the Western elite congratulated themselves for inventing the globalized world, global peoples have learned how to unwind it. Every advantage the First World assumed was permanent—the rule of law, stable institutions, reliable energy, manufacturing dominance, military supremacy, the primacy of the dollar—has become a block the Third World can remove with a fingertip. Not always intentionally, not always coordinated, but always consequential.

Remove one block—mass migration—and the labor market convulses.

Remove another—control of rare earth minerals—and the technological core stutters.

Remove another—energy leverage—and whole economies wobble.

Remove yet another—the spiritual confidence of the West—and the tower sways dangerously.

The First World is discovering, too late, that the mechanisms it believed it controlled—global supply chains, resource networks, monetary influence—were not architecture but scaffolding. And as the scaffolding comes down, the great edifice of the postwar order begins to lean, groan, and crack.

The miners in Britain never sought to destroy the British state; they merely wanted justice. Yet their struggle revealed the brittleness of an empire that believed itself immortal. The autoworkers in America never intended to challenge the American century; they simply demanded fairness. Yet their strikes exposed the shifting tectonics beneath the industrial heartland.

Likewise, the Third World does not gather in dark rooms to dismantle the First—but the dismantling is happening because power players use these Third World populations to do so.

Meanwhile, the West argues about pronouns.

The West holds struggle sessions about feelings while the foundations rot.

The West sues itself into paralysis.

The West sells credentials like carnival tickets, awarding expertise without knowledge.

The West embraces pseudo-morality while losing the capacity to enforce reality.

And in the thickness of this existential fog—so dense you can breathe it, so corrosive it stings the skin—Western leaders accuse their own citizens of treason for noticing what is happening.

The ultimate conspiracy theory, then, is not that the Third World is plotting against the First. It is that the First World “leaders” constructed a tower so tall, so fragile, so performative, so detached from substance, that anyone, anywhere, could begin removing blocks and the whole structure would tremble.

This is what a fiatized world order looks like: a global Jenga tower held together not by strength but by inertia. And once the unmooring begins, gravity does the rest.

In the rubble of this unraveling though, something new is gestating.

A new kind of leader.

A new kind of mind.

A new kind of civilization.

The Avatar does not emerge from stability but from the shock of a world realizing its illusions are no longer load-bearing. The Avatar rises when the tower finally tilts far enough that the people cry out—not for conspiracy theories, but for coherence.

And coherence is always born in the ruins.



When Republicans Do Long Interviews With Liberal Journalists


Whenever Republican officials sit for an extensive interview or series of interviews with a liberal media source, their supporters ask: Why did you have to do that? Why does Donald Trump need to speak to Michael Wolff or Bob Woodward? Now, it's Trump's chief of staff Susie Wiles talking to author Chris Whipple for the lefties of Vanity Fair.

But if Republicans made an energetic policy of not accepting any interview requests from liberal journalists, the press would paint it as authoritarian "North Korea," because liberals dominate the media. It's much easier for Democrats to accept zero interviews from conservative media than the reverse.

President Joe Biden wasn't going to sit down with Fox News or with some spunky magazine writer from the right wing. No one expects it. Biden barely sat down with anybody for an interview, and when he did, it was typically tender softballs from sympathizers, like actors Drew Barrymore and Kal Penn.

Republicans should not be surprised when their words end up spun against them. But the drama over Wiles and her 11 interviews with Whipple can be overdone. Mediaite put these words in their headline: "The Trump Era Is Ending." Year One isn't over yet. Here's what's funny: They're quoting former Trump communications director Anthony Scaramucci. The "Scaramucci Era" at the White House was 10 days -- in part because he granted an interview to Ryan Lizza of The New Yorker. Oops.

Whipple wrote a flattering book that came out in 2023 about Biden titled "The Fight of His Life." He told NPR he asked for an interview with Biden. "I was told I could email questions and I would get written answers in reply. You know, clearly, they were uncomfortable even then with the prospect of the president having an interview in real time with a reporter."

The stage management wasn't a problem. The media elite didn't care about their own access. They were members of the Biden team, sharing their questions to Biden in advance so they could type them up on note cards. It certainly didn't matter with Whipple, who appeared on the "PBS NewsHour" for a book interview back then and cheerfully proclaimed Biden was hitting his stride: "I think he goes into his third year really with the wind at his back."

No one finds a scandal in the way Whipple operates. In his 2025 campaign book "Uncharted," he depends intensely for juicy details on former Biden chief of staff Ron Klain. But Klain seems to have two personalities. There's the one who can see Biden can't possibly be president for another four years as he watches him bumble disastrously in debate prep. Then there's the one who thinks it's a "mistake" for Biden to withdraw. Whipple doesn't reconcile the two Klains. The insider source is always right in his case. 

President Trump has granted far more access to reporters in his second term than Biden, and yet the media elites never stop trying to wreck his presidency. He knows he has the right to remain silent, and that anything he says can and will be used against him in a court of public opinion.

You can't win by granting access, and you can't win by denying it. The authors and activists of the Democrat press approach Trump with the mentality of "heads we win, tails you lose."



🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


JD Vance Points Out the Consequence of the Senate “Blue Slip” Veto of Judicial Nominees















The blue slip process has been a part of the Senate’s judicial nomination procedure since at least 1917. When a President nominates an individual for a U.S. circuit or district court judgeship, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee sends a blue slip —a form colored blue— to the two Senators representing the nominee’s home state. This form allows the Senators to express their opinions about the nominee.

Positive Response: If a home-state Senator has no objections, they return the blue slip with a positive response, indicating support for the nominee. Negative Response or Withholding: If a Senator objects, they may either return the slip with a negative response or choose not to return it at all. In both cases, this is treated as a lack of support for the nominee, which halts the nomination process.

JD Vance notes this process is being used to manipulate the appointments of Judges in leftist states.  This creates a dual justice system; one of the core issues within our extremely divided nation.

[SOURCE]

JD Vance is not wrong.  However, as with all things corrupted within the state of our Republic, if the blue slip process is removed the next leftist President can corrupt the judiciary within Republican states.

Of course, all of this is an outcome of the 17th Amendment, which stopped the state legislatures from having control over their senators.  Under the original constitutional framework, the Senate was designed to represent the interests of the state, as the Senators were appointed by state legislature, not popular votes.  The Sea Island assembly destroyed this cornerstone when they triggered the 17th Amendment.

Repeal the 17th Amendment, and just about everything in federal government changes.

Machiavelli said“It must be remembered that there is nothing more difficult to plan, more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to manage than a new system. For the initiator has the enmity of all who would profit by the preservation of the old institution and merely lukewarm defenders in those who gain by the new ones.”  A prescient and oft repeated quote that is pertinent to the situation.

When our founders created the system of government for our constitutional republic, they built in layers of protection from federal control over the lives of people in the states.  Over time, those protections have been eroded as the federal bureaucracy has seized power.  One of the biggest changes that led to the creation of the permanent political class was the 17th Amendment.

Our founders created a system where Senators were appointed by the state legislatures.  In this original system, the Senate was bound by obligation to look out for the best interests of their specific states.  Under the ‘advise and consent‘ rules of Senate confirmation for executive branch appointments, the intent was to ensure the presidential appointee -who would now carry out regulatory activity- would not undermine the independent position of the states.

The nucleus of corruption amid every element of the federal institutions of government is the United States Senate.   The U.S. Senate, also known as the “upper chamber,” is the single most powerful elected element in modern federal government.

The Intelligence Branch is the most powerful branch of government.  However, the U.S. Senate is the most powerful assembly of federally elected officials.  We pretend the IC branch doesn’t exist; that’s part of our problem.  At least we admit the Senate exists.

All other elected federal corruption is dependent on a corrupt and ineffective Senate.  If we correct the problems with the Senate, and reconnect the representation within the chamber to the state-level legislative bodies, we will then see immediate change.  However, there would be ZERO institutional allies in this effort.

When the 17th Amendment (direct voting for Senators) took the place of state appointments, the perspective of ‘advise and consent’ changed.  The Senate was now in the position of ensuring the presidential appointee did not undermine the power of the permanent bureaucracy, which is the root of power for the upper-chamber.

Senate committees, Homeland Security, Judiciary, Intelligence, Armed Services, Foreign Relations, etc. now consists of members who carry an imbalanced level of power within government.  The Senate now controls who will be in charge of executive branch agencies like the DOJ, DHS, FBI, CIA, ODNI, DoD, State Dept and NSA, from the position of their own power and control in Washington DC.

In essence, the 17th Amendment flipped the intent of the constitution from protecting the individual states to protecting the federal government.

Almost every source of federal issue: ex. spending, intervention and foreign assistance, conflict with the states, burdensome regulation, surveillance and spying on American citizens, the two-tiered justice system and the erosion of liberty & individual rights (see COVID examples), can be sourced back to the problem created by the 17th Amendment.

Because of the scale of their power, the Senate will not give up control easily; and every institution of society and government will actively work to block/stop We The People from taking back control of the upper chamber.  Every entity from Wall Street to multinational corporations, big tech, banks, foreign governments and world organizations would align against us.   When you truly understand the epicenter of the corruption, then you are able to see the tentacles extending from it.

It would be easy to say “repeal the 17th Amendment;“ it is ‘another kettle of fish’ entirely to walk through the process to make that happen.  Yes, ultimately, we do need a full repeal of the 17th Amendment and return the selection of the senators from each state with a nomination and appointment process within the state legislature.  [Common Explainer Here]

Seventeenth Amendment- “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures.

When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.” (link)

Prior to the 17th Amendment, there was significant state level corruption as business interests, and Senate candidates worked in power groups with party officials to attain the position.  Politicians seeking Senate seats began campaigning for state legislative candidates in order to assemble support.

The state legislative races then became a process of influence amid powerful interests seeking to support their Senate candidate.   Get the right people in the State legislature, and you can get the Senator appointed.

Those state-level entities, bankers, wealthy people of influence, later became the permanent K-Street lobbying groups once the 17th Amendment was ratified. In essence, they just shifted the location of their influence operation from the state to an office in Washington DC.   [Those same power groups, albeit much larger, now write the physical legislation we see in congress.]  Additionally, prior to the 17th Amendment, there were issues of vacancies in federal senate seats as state legislatures could not agree on an individual Senator.

The biggest issue following the passage of the 17th Amendment became Senators who were no longer representing the interests of their state.  Instead, they were representing the interests of the power elite groups who were helping them fund the mechanisms of their re-election efforts.

A Senator only needs to run for re-election every six years.  The 17th Amendment is the only amendment that changed the structure of the Congress, as it was written by the founders.

Over time, the Senate chamber itself began using their advice and consent authority to control the executive and judicial branch.  The origination of a nomination now holds the question: “Can this person pass the Senate confirmation process?”

The Senate now abuses this power to ensure no one challenges them.  Additionally, the Senate began using their oversight capacity to control elements within the executive branch and judicial branch.   The full scope of that issue in modern form is OUTLINED HERE – which is the cornerstone of the Intelligence Branch of Government.

If we could repeal the 17th Amendment and return the selection to the state legislature, you can see where the background work of Tactical Civics and Extreme Federalism begin to take on importance.   [NOTE: Within the repeal effort, we would need to include a recall process for states to reach out and yank back their Senator if they go astray; the ability to recall was missing in the original construct of the framers; it would need to be added.]

◊ PATH ONE is the primary platform of the presidential candidate…. a visible and emphasized mandate that includes: “vote me into office and you are voting to repeal the 17th Amendment “.  This specific election issue would need to be the #1 priority of the candidate and spoken at every event.

This approach gives a presidential candidate the mandate to demand congress to act if he won the 2024 election.  We need a warrior of epic strength, resolve and fortitude.

◊ PATH TWO is the parallel path built along with the election platform path and put into place in the event that Congress refused to accept the mandate.

Obviously, this would be an ugly battle.   The second path is a convention of states. 

The ‘convention of states‘ would need to be detailed, strategically planned, and the future schedule determined during the GOP convention preceding the November election (assuming the right candidate wins).   That way, if Congress refuses to act on their own, within say the first 100 days of the new administration, the state legislatures will then assemble a convention for the singular and limited purpose of one action item: “repeal the 17th Amendment “.  That’s it. Full Stop.  Nothing more. Nothing else entertained.

There is a lot more to this, and a lot more to cover in discussion of this.  However, this is the path that can resolve most of the issues we face with an out-of-control federal government.   The shift in power would kneecap the Intelligence Branch of Government by re-instituting genuine oversight and control. A repeal of the 17th Amendment stops Senators from campaigning, needing to raise money and puts them directly into the accountability position as a steward for the interests of their state.

The people within each state would then have a mechanism to address any negative federal action by contacting their state legislative representative.  In a worst-case scenario, a rogue Senator could be removed within days if they support any federal legislative activity that is not in alignment with the state interest.  This approach also wipes out most of the power amid the Senate Majority Leader, as he/she could also be recalled by the state and would be less likely to work against the interests of the majority in the chamber.

The House of Representatives was created to be the voice of the people, ie, “The Peoples’ House.”  However, the U.S. Senate was structurally created to be the place where state government had representation in the federal government decision-making.  The 17th Amendment completely removed state representation, and we have been in an escalating battle over state’s rights ever since.

Overlay that DC structural issue with the fact that almost all of the bureaucracy created by this skewed DC system is now in place to defend itself from any outside effort to change it, and you get this UniParty problem that Donald Trump fully exposed.

Repeal the 17th Amendment, and we would see the most significant restoration of freedom, liberty and social balance in our lifetime.


President Trump Orders a Full Blockade of Sanctioned Venezuelan Oil Tankers



President Trump, on Tuesday, announced a blockade of sanctioned oil tankers going to and from Venezuela, as tensions continue to rise between the U.S. and Venezuelan dictator, Nicolas Maduro. 

"Venezuela is completely surrounded by the largest Armada ever assembled in the History of South America," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "It will only get bigger, and the shock to them will be like nothing they have ever seen before — Until such time as they return to the United States of America all of the Oil, Land, and other Assets that they previously stole from us. The illegitimate Maduro Regime is using Oil from these stolen Oil Fields to finance themselves, Drug Terrorism, Human Trafficking, Murder, and Kidnapping. For the theft of our Assets, and many other reasons, including Terrorism, Drug Smuggling, and Human Trafficking, the Venezuelan Regime has been designated a FOREIGN TERRORIST ORGANIZATION."

Therefore, today, I am ordering A TOTAL AND COMPLETE BLOCKADE OF ALL SANCTIONED OIL TANKERS going into, and out of, Venezuela. The Illegal Aliens and Criminals that the Maduro Regime has sent into the United States during the weak and inept Biden Administration, are being returned to Venezuela at a rapid pace. America will not allow Criminals, Terrorists, or other Countries, to rob, threaten, or harm our Nation and, likewise, will not allow a Hostile Regime to take our Oil, Land, or any other Assets, all of which must be returned to the United States, IMMEDIATELY. Thank you for your attention to this matter!

This comes as the Trump administration has carried out a multitude of strikes on narco terrorist vessels coming out of Latin America. The U.S. military has conducted roughly 25 strikes, resulting in the death of over 95 people, as it has begun a legitimate and this time effective war on drugs.



Foiled Left-Wing Terrorist Attack Must Be The Beginning, Not End, Of Trump’s Antifa Crackdown


The time for swift, strategic, and sweeping steps to end organized left-wing violence is now or it might be never.



Four far-left extremists face a myriad of conspiracy and other felony charges for allegedly plotting a series of New Year’s Eve bombings followed by a similar ambush on Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers in Los Angeles.

The alleged attacks, hatched by the so-called pro-Palestine Turtle Island Liberation Front, were discovered by law enforcement after four of its members were allegedly caught testing out the pipe bombs they planned to plant at five LA businesses.

One of the four suspects, Audrey Carroll, allegedly admitted to keeping a “terrorist diary” where “I wrote down multiple plans that never happened.” A search of her home also yielded posters calling for “Death to America,” “Death to ICE,” and “Long live Turtle Island and Palestine.” 

An Instagram account reportedly linked to the radicals and managed by Carroll similarly touts rhetoric calling America a “brutal evil monster,” demanding “revolutionary actions” through “anti-capitalism week” and “liberation through decolonization,” and threatening that “peaceful protest will never be enough.” One post referred to the assassination of Charlie Kirk as “some asshole got shot (tragedy, ya know?).”

A New York Post article noted that a fifth unidentified suspect believed to have connections to the group “was arrested in New Orleans while planning a separate attack.”

This is far from the first time “far left anti-government domestic terror cells” attempted to murder Americans and send ICE a message. And unless federal, state, and local law enforcement start making more arrests soon, it likely won’t be the last.

In September, President Donald Trump used his executive power to designate Antifa, “A SICK, DANGEROUS, RADICAL LEFT DISASTER,” a major terrorist organization. Despite receiving this classification three months ago, shortly after an alleged left-winger assassinated Charlie Kirk, Antifa and other radical groups have yet to feel the full force of the federal government. The Trump administration also previously promised to use the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act to interrupt the stream of left-wing funding to Antifa.

Outside of a few reportedly foiled attacks and forceful statements declaring “Antifa is an existential threat to our nation,” there appear to be few public examples of the administration’s attempt to curb the well-known rise of leftist violence in the U.S.

Is there a chance that the FBI is working secretly, yet tirelessly, behind the scenes to round up every last leftist terrorist? Maybe. The problem is, those far-left radicalsspurred on by Democrats, are working tirelessly in broad daylight to literally kill life, law, and order without any punishment.

Under Biden, federal law enforcement put child sex abuse investigations and pipe bomber investigations on the backburner to target those present at the Capitol on January 6, 2021. They were not only arrested and kept in inhumane conditions but hung out to dry by leftist lawyers who once scrambled to defend foreign terrorists.

Contrast that rigorous response to people wrongfully deemed domestic terrorists with the treatment given to the rioters who ravaged the nation’s cities during the summer of 2020. Instead of facing mass prosecutions for their crimes, the people who looted and burned buildings and cars in places like Minneapolis were bailed out by funds touted by Democrats, including vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris.

Law enforcement shouldn’t need footage of detonating explosives in the Mojave Desert to know Antifa and its adjacent organizations are up to no good and haven’t been for decades. Their reach is indisputable and only empowered by neglect from the feds.

Radicals in locations ranging from Portland to the suburbs inhabited by Supreme Court justices have spent years proudly destroying property and terrorizing Americans in the name of leftism. In many cases, they fantasize about such conquests online.

Arresting five people associated with a group that openly pledges “to escalate and get rowdy” if their demands to “make the fascists behave” are not met is a good start, but it’s far from enough to stave off future attacks. What we need, in the words of Christopher Rufo, are “midnight raids, mug shots, case numbers, nonprofit-status revocations, asset seizures, inmate rosters.”

With three years left in Trump’s second and last term, there’s only so much time for the administration to enforce a widespread crackdown like the one the president bragged about. The urgency for immediate action grows with the realization that leftist violence would be further neglected, if not encouraged by a future Democrat administration, much like what happened under President Joe Biden. Both are dangerous to Americans of all kinds, but especially Christian conservatives.

This country can’t afford to wait until last steps of an elaborate plan designed to harm both civilians and immigration enforcement are in motion to see the results Trump promised in September, days after a left-wing nutjob murdered a conservative civilian for his beliefs. The time for swift, strategic, and sweeping steps to end organized left-wing violence is now or never.