Thursday, October 30, 2025

What Does the New Marxist Democrat Party See As America's End-State?


The new Marxist Democratic Party has a collection of leadership personalities as freakish as the bar scene in Star Wars.

We have the octogenarian failed carpenter-turned-Vermont politician, Bernie Sanders. Bernie the Bolshevik, who was transplanted from Brooklyn (retaining that appealing Brooklyn accent), so admired the Soviet Union and its socio-economic system that he honeymooned there with his wife. Who in their normal mind does that?

Then we have the failed-bartendress-turned-politician Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who feigned being a down-and-out kid from the Bronx, when in fact she was the daughter of a successful architect and grew up in tony Westchester County. That cute video of her dancing on the rooftop while attending expensive Boston University, which seems like a lifetime ago, bedazzled the Swiftie generation of New Yorkers. She won a literal contest in a cattle call for progressive candidates to be the Democratic nominee for Congress after her brother submitted her name. She went on to defeat a powerful but asleep-at-the-switch Democrat stalwart, Joe Crowley, in the primary. The rest, as they say, is history.

To round out the unholy trinity of Marxist revolutionaries presently comprising the Democratic Party’s “thought leaders,” we have the wealthy Ugandan-born, antisemitic communist Muslim, Zohran Mamdani, likely to be the next mayor of New York, the city with the largest population of Jews in the world, outside of Israel. Makes perfect sense.

What is really baffling is how this cabal of communist rabble-rousers, whose cliched and demagogic “Fight the Oligarchy” political rallies sound as hip as the geriatric crowds who turned out for the recent “No Kings” protests, actually came to command the heights of one of America’s great political parties. And make no mistake: These three people do control the Democratic Party today.

While the most macho, ultra-capitalist, tireless force of nature to occupy the White House since Teddy Roosevelt, President Donald Trump, is restoring America’s greatness on every front – economically, militarily, diplomatically – a large segment of the American people irrationally despises the man and seems to embrace failure for their country. They would rather throw their lot in with Bernie, AOC and Zohran, who promise to take America… where, exactly?

What is their vision for America? One has to ask oneself, what is the end-state they see for this phenomenal country after nearly 250 years of its development into the most prosperous and powerful nation ever to exist on earth?

I think the current “government shutdown” has afforded us a glimpse into that end-state. The glimpse takes the form of self-produced videos, in which some beneficiaries of SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program), or what used to be called Food Stamps, tell us what they are doing, or plan to do, now that their free food provided by Uncle Sam may be cut off as a result of the shutdown.

It’s sort of a microcosm of what the entire nation would look like if Bernie/AOC/Zohran had their way and successfully transformed America into their dystopian communist hell. Undisturbed by the full disclosure and the possibility of the police being alerted, these SNAP recipients openly announce their plan to steal the food that they formerly obtained through SNAP.

One woman, who claims that she has run out of food stamps, yet inexplicably has enough money to afford a car, a cell phone and an Internet connection, brags on video about stealing from a grocery store. She tells her viewers, “Everything out here is yours. Whether or not you take it, they call that sh** free will. I call that sh** eminent domain. You know what I’m saying? One thing I learned from the white men: Take it!”

I encourage all my fellow taxpaying Americans to take three minutes to watch this educational video, because this woman has helpfully provided a portent of an America transformed by the Bernie/AOC/Zohran vision. (Warning: NSFW. Strong language.) She provides gems other than stealing food from the supermarket, such as advice to “infiltrate” churches and have them pony up money for your rent.

Ronald Reagan famously called women such as this “welfare queens,” but this woman has used modern technology to take it to a new level. She tells us in clear language and living color what the rest of society can expect in a communist America, when we are all reduced to government handouts, and those handouts inevitably run out.

This woman is not isolated. Many similar folks have taken to TikTok and other social media, posting videos of themselves looting grocery stores and making threats because the government hasn’t loaded up their EBT cards during the shutdown. An entire compilation can be found here.

This is what the future of this great nation looks like under the modern Marxist Democratic Party.

It is ugly. It is violent. It is dystopian. It is the end-state of all socialist and communist policies.

There is a civil war taking place in the Democratic Party, between “moderates” and Marxists. I think the Marxists will win and Zohran will be their ideological leader. I also think that Zohran is going to do to the Democratic Party what Alissa Heinerscheid did to the Budweiser brand when she made trans influencer Dylan Mulvaney a Budweiser spokesman: Completely destroy it. One can only hope.



Podcast and entertainment thread for Oct 30

 


Hope there is much peace in your life.

Democrats Must Be Punished for Their Lawfare


The Democrat party is the undisputed champion of lawfare — the corrupt practice of using the legal system to persecute perceived political enemies and deprive non-Democrats of their constitutional rights.  Donald Trump had a clean criminal record for the first seventy years of his life.  After he became the Republican standard-bearer, dirty Democrat lawyers unleashed an avalanche of meritless criminal investigations, prosecutions, and civil suits that have continued to this day.  

Democrat FBI agents and DOJ attorneys tried to frame him as a Russian spy.  Democrat spies hiding within the national security community worked to get him impeached.  Democrat judges permitted Democrat federal agents to raid the president’s private residence and rummage through the first lady’s underwear drawer.  Democrat legislators rewrote civil statutes with the specific intent to target Trump as a defendant.  Democrat attorneys general twisted statutory language to “get Trump” and bankrupt his family.

Democrat prosecutors tried to put President Trump in prison for pursuing lawful remedies to the fraudulent, mail-in-ballot-tainted 2020 “election.”  Democrat prosecutors tried to put him in prison for a nonexistent campaign finance violation.  Democrat prosecutors tried to put him in prison for possessing exculpatory documents that expose the Russia Collusion Hoax for the crime that it is.  Democrat prosecutors tried to put an American president in prison for the rest of his life under the delusional legal fantasy that the commander in chief had engaged in “insurrection” against his own government.

Along the way, anybody within Trump’s orbit — both well known associates and unknown, random Americans — became a target for Democrat agents, prosecutors, and judges to harass.  In an effort to prop up the fraudulent Russia Collusion Hoax, Democrat prosecutors put President Trump’s campaign chair, Paul Manafort, in prison and attempted to do the same to his national security adviser, Michael Flynn.  In an effort to scare potential witnesses, heavily armed agents arrested Trump’s political adviser, Roger Stone, in a predawn raid.  In an effort to suborn false testimony that might implicate Trump in the fraudulent Russia Collusion Hoax, Democrat agents and prosecutors intimidated ancillary campaign workers, such as George Papadopoulos.  Time and again, Democrat agents humiliated Trump associates by publicly arresting them, placing them in handcuffs and leg irons, parading them before corporate news cameras for unnecessary “perp walks,” and strip-searching them while in custody.

Democrat lawyers have prosecuted and sought to disbar (successfully in some instances) numerous attorneys representing President Trump — including Rudy Giuliani, Jenna Ellis, John Eastman, and Sidney Powell.  Democrats in the DOJ prosecuted and imprisoned Trump’s political strategist, Steve Bannon, and his senior economic counselor, Peter Navarro, for contempt of Congress — even though the DOJ has regularly declined to pursue similar charges against Democrats, including Barack Obama’s attorney general, Eric Holder.

These are just a handful of the better known individuals who have been unjustly targeted and prosecuted because of their connection to Donald Trump.  In addition to them, thousands of ordinary Americans have been similarly harassed and unjustly prosecuted for identifying as a Trump-supporter and “Make America Great Again” voter.

Democrats in the FBI and DOJ bragged about hunting down Trump-supporters who attended the January 6, 2021 Capitol protest against the mail-in-ballot-rigged 2020 “election.”  Whereas the whole Washington Establishment — including elected officials, judges, bureaucrats, and corporate news propagandists — immediately labeled the three-hour Capitol trespass an “insurrection,” it is important to remember that the vast majority of Americans who were present that day remained outside or walked through open doors, strolled calmly down hallways, and caused no damage of any kind.  In a country known for its Second Amendment defense of personal firearm ownership, these Americans were unarmed and posed no threat.  Nevertheless, a previously disciplined Capitol Police officer shot and killed unarmed U.S. Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt.  

Six months earlier, Antifa domestic terrorists and Black Lives Matter rioters burned down cities across the country, killing numerous Americans over months of sustained violence and causing more property damage than any riot in the nation’s history.  Despite the death and destruction during those dangerous months, prominent Democrats and corporate news propagandists insisted on labeling 2020’s domestic terrorism the “Summer of Love.”  The Democrat party’s nominee for vice president, Kamala Harris, encouraged Americans to bail out anyone arrested for looting businesses or burning down neighborhoods.  The Democrat-sponsored riots of 2020 set off a wave of arson, theft, murder, and violence against local police officers.  It was the textbook definition of an “insurrection,” yet Establishment Washington insiders monstrously pretended that the prolonged criminal enterprise should be celebrated as some twisted reenactment of the civil rights movement.  Few people were arrested; fewer were actually prosecuted; even fewer were criminally sentenced.

This is the kind of criminal justice double-standard to which Trump-supporters and MAGA voters have become accustomed.  President Obama’s IRS illegally targeted conservative and religious nonprofits in order to prevent them from working against his re-election efforts.  Under President Biden, FEMA employees intentionally ignored hurricane victims who could be identified as Trump-supporters.  Domestic terrorists vandalize and burn down Christian churches, Jewish synagogues, and pro-life facilities, and Democrat prosecutors refuse to investigate the crimes or punish those responsible.  Violent thugs beat up conservative workers and journalists, and Democrat judges give the criminals a slap on the wrist.  Politicians, judges, and lawyers defended the 2020 riots as a “Summer of Love” but condoned the use of SWAT teams for predawn raids on humble homes owned by retired grandparents accused of being January 6 “insurrectionists.”

With all of this as background, Democrats in office and in corporate newsrooms now accuse President Trump of seeking “revenge” against those who have inflicted harm upon him, his colleagues, and his voters in the recent past.  The prevailing feeling among Democrats in charge of America’s powerful institutions seems to be that Democrats should be allowed to harass and persecute their political opponents without paying any price.  On the contrary, there must be a price.  Otherwise, the crimes Democrats have already committed against conservative Americans will look small compared to what they have planned for the future.

Not only has Illinois governor and aspiring 2028 Democrat presidential nominee J.B. Pritzker called Department of Homeland Security officials and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents “Nazis,” but also he plans on prosecuting them for arresting criminal illegal aliens in his state.  Democrat Senator Mark Kelly is threatening to prosecute “young service members” for following President Trump’s lawful orders to wage war against narco-terrorists killing Americans.  Democrat Congressman Eric Swalwell is demanding that Democrat candidates for the presidency pledge to “take a wrecking ball” to the privately funded renovations of the White House’s East Wing.  Other prominent Democrats continue to insist that Democrat aspirants to the presidency first promise to imprison President Trump and his closest advisers for the rest of their lives.

Even after inciting the murder of Charlie Kirk just last month, Democrat pundits are unwilling to moderate their rhetorical calls for violence.  Reptilian James Carville recently argued that all Trump-supporters must be rounded up, shaved bald, dressed in prison uniforms, and paraded down the street so that Democrats can spit on them.  He insists that this “walk of shame” is the “only way to discourage future collaborators.”  This is the kind of persecution and violence Democrats intend to inflict upon conservatives should they reclaim power.

We should not be surprised.  We have endured Democrats’ abuse of the legal system at least since President Clinton was distracting the nation from his own scandals by pretending that freedom-loving Americans pose the greatest threat to the United States.  Hillary Clinton calls us “deplorables.”  Pritzker and the rest call us “fascists” and “Nazis.”  Democrats must be punished for their crimes before Carville and his Antifa friends have a chance to carry out their threats.



Shocked that Gen Z Believes in Political Violence? I’m Not


The younger generation is more tolerant than ever of political violence. I'm not shocked because I witnessed how students react to political differences on college campuses. It's not about Left and Right—it's about losing the fundamental idea that disagreement is good in democracy.

Following Charlie Kirk's death, so many politicians and older Americans seemed completely shocked at the younger generation's record-hightolerance of political violence. After spending four years in elite academia, I'm not shocked at all. I wish I were.

I graduated from Penn this past May with my Bachelor's in English and Minors in Political Science and Hispanic Studies. Throughout my time at Penn, I was deeply involved with College Republicans, but not by design. Long story short, I came into Penn as a strong liberal, grounded in the Democratic values I grew up with.

However, when I arrived on campus, I noticed that stepping out of line meant political isolation. I grew up in a community that believed in critical thinking and questioning, in a family that believed political nuance and not following the party line exactly were indicators of well-formed viewpoints.

What I noticed at Penn, at one of the oldest, most prestigious universities in the country, was that intellectual diversity was not valued by the community. Conformity was key. This led me to College Republicans, where I ultimately found that my views across the political spectrum found a home.

In the Freedom for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) 2026 College Free Speech Rankings, key findings would undoubtedly shock older generations. But for anyone expressing nuanced and diverse viewpoints on a college campus, we're used to this reality.

During my four years at Penn, I heard grave antisemitic comments from pro-Palestinian demonstrations on campus and offensive comments from the other side dismissing the Palestinian struggle. During one demonstration, one of the loudest chants was, "There is only one solution. Student-led revolution." I listened in lectures as professors tiptoed around material anxiously, worried about getting canceled by students. I heard students in my political science classes curate opinions they thought would be socially acceptable.

But all of these offenses seem minor—irrelevant even. The idea of hostility toward different viewpoints on a college campus isn't a new phenomenon. The newest turn in the bleak trajectory of higher education occurred following Charlie Kirk's horrible death.

On Sidechat, an anonymous app that functions similarly to Reddit, where anyone with a Penn University email can post, I was appalled. Appalled, but not surprised. As a response to "RIP Charlie Kirk," someone responded, "Rest in piss indeed," with nearly a hundred upvotes. Some of the highly upvoted posts included:

"oh no! a bad human being died."

"the man who said 'gun deaths are necessary to protect the 2nd amendment' got shot. i guess he finally decided to stand on business and support his claims."

"if you're promoting the removal of human rights for minorities and anti gun control rhetoric then i'm not gonna pray for you when you get shot."

What's worse? The student response to Penn College Republicans holding a vigil for Kirk's death. You would guess—as Americans who believe in freedom of speech and embrace dialogue across the political spectrum—that Penn students would have turned out in waves to remember the life of a man who devoted himself to hosting conversations with those who think differently. Instead, the group was a small number of right-leaning students.

When the predominant university newspaper covered the event, the comments demonstrated no empathy. "At least the rest of the student body can now easily identify the racists," one comment with hundreds of likes read.

Another one stated, "The impact he had was fundamentally negative in every respect, so I can see why the college Republicans embraced him."

This is what unfiltered social media dialogue looks like at one of the most elite universities in the country, if not the world. These are the attitudes that some of the "best and brightest" students in the world hold toward views that differ from their own.

What's happening at Penn is happening across college campuses in America.

FIRE's report also revealed that—for the first time ever—a majority of students opposed their school allowing controversial speakers to speak. Moreover, the percentage of students saying it is acceptable to shout down a speaker, block entry to a speaker's event, or use violence to stop a campus speech is at record highs.

What FIRE also found? While students are becoming increasingly more tolerant of political violence, they're becoming less tolerant of controversial viewpoints on the whole.

So, what does this mean? It's not about left-leaning or right-leaning, Republicans or Democrats. It's about young people losing the fundamental American idea that differences in opinion should be embraced.

My story at Penn is one that students experience every day across America. Disagreement is under attack. If we don't tackle the root of the problem in higher education, political violence will no longer shock us—it will define us.



🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Here Are 8 Creepy Ways Biden’s Handlers Tried To Hide His Mental Decline To Keep A Grip On Power


Anyone connected to the scheme to hide Biden’s mental decline should never be appointed or elected to a federal position again. 



While president, Joe Biden turned feeble before the nation’s eyes. His closest allies — his chief of staff, doctor, even his wife — refused to stop him from making a fool of himself on the world stage. They treated him like a puppet, abused the highest office in the land, and with the help of the propaganda press, lied to the American people all the while.

A report released this week by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform  tells us what we already knew but with greater detail. The 100-page report, “The Biden Autopen Presidency: Decline, Delusion, and Deception in the White House,” shows how members of Biden’ trusted inner circle were willing to do just about anything to keep him in office.

The committee, chaired by Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., has asked the Department of Justice to investigate the actions of members of the inner circle, and its findings related to executive actions signed by the autopen.

“President Biden’s inner circle worked tirelessly and creatively to conceal the president’s bad days — whether it was through Hollywood filmmakers or aides disguised as the Easter Bunny,” the report said. 

Here is what the report says about how Biden’s handlers managed his presidency.

No Mental Exam

Biden’s longtime physician, Dr. Kevin O’Connor, never conducted a cognitive exam on Biden. Instead, O’Connor, “Propped up the president through grossly misleading medical assessments,” the report said. “His refusal to answer questions about the execution of his duties as physician to the president — combined with testimony indicating that Dr. Kevin O’Connor may have succumbed to political pressure from the inner circle, influencing his medical decisions and aiding in the cover-up—legitimizes the public’s concerns that Dr. O’Connor was not forthright in carrying out his ultimate duties to the country.”

The Committee recommends that the District of Columbia Board of Medicine review O’Connor’s actions while he was White House physician for any potential wrongdoing in Biden’s medical care, including whether O’Connor produced false or misleading medical reports.

The propaganda press failed to use basic observation as a journalistic tool and pushed O’Connor’s unchallenged reports to the public.

The New York Times blindly parroted O’Connor’s reports, declaring Biden “Healthy” and “Vigorous” in 2021. The Washington Post declared Biden healthy and vigorous in 2023, and CBS news called him “fit for duty” in 2024.

The report describes Biden’s inner circle as “resistant to any medical examinations that may have hurt President Biden’s chances in the 2024 election.” Politics was more important that giving Biden the best shot at medical care. His team discussed medical exams and decided against them. Anita Dunn, longtime political operative and Biden aide who served as a senior advisor to the former president, told the committee that the former president’s senior advisors reached a consensus that President Biden should not undergo a cognitive exam — despite persistent calls from the public to do so, the report said.

Disastrous Debate Was Supposed To Save Biden

While Biden’s Chief of Staff Jeff Zients never stepped in to save the United States from Biden’s decline, he was moved to act to protect the Democrat Party when loss of the executive branch seemed likely.  Zients testified that the Biden-Trump debate was held on an early date specifically to counter claims that Biden was too old for a second term.

“The whole purpose – not the whole purpose, a goal of moving the debate forward was to show that that was not the case. And, unfortunately, he had a bad night, and it was just the opposite. So I thought that, at that point, given the polling, concern around the President and his age, these calls from leadership on the Hill, the Caucus, that his likelihood of being reelected had diminished quite a bit and that he was better off letting someone else do that,” Zients said, according to the committee.

NPR reported that the debate “breaks with campaign tradition, occurring months earlier than usual…,” and now we know why.

Keeping Biden in office and in the 2024 campaign was profitable for Mike Donilon, one of Biden’s longtime advisors. Donilon was also Biden’s 2024 campaign chief and told the committee that he received “just a little bit short of $4 million,” in that position. He was paid monthly, so every month Biden stayed on the campaign trail was another paycheck for Donilon. He told the committee that Biden would have paid and additional $4 million if Biden won in 2024, for a total of $8 million.

Hollywood Handlers

For help with Biden’s bumbling stage presence, the White House enlisted the help of Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg, Co-Founder of DreamWorks and former chairman of Walt Disney Studios. They tried to improve his speech delivery and said his voice was not loud enough.

Spielberg and Katzenberg both helped Biden prepare for the State of the Union address in March 2024. It is the sort of task one would assume a president could handle without handlers. Spielberg and Katzenberg advised President Biden to take his tie off at casual events, Zients testified.

May Have Considered A Wheelchair

The report lists the many times Biden fell, tripped, or stumbled in public.

On March 19, 2021, Biden tripped or fell three times in the span of three seconds while boarding Air Force One. ABC News minimized the incident with the incredible headline, “Biden ‘just fine’ after tripping 3 times jogging up steps to Air Force One.”

On June 18, 2022, Biden fell off his bike while riding in Delaware; Feb. 22, 2023, Biden stumbled while boarding Air Force One leaving Poland. June 1, 2023, Biden fell on stage at the Air Force Academy graduation ceremony. The committee asked Annie Tomasini, deputy chief of staff of operations about this fall because she was there, but Tomasini refused to answer, invoking the Fifth Amendment.

“As such, questions remain as to whether Tomasini urged Dr. O’Connor to refrain from providing medical assistance to President Biden that would be visible to the public,” the report said. “It has been reported that Dr. O’Connor privately said that ‘if [President Biden] had another bad fall, a wheelchair might be necessary for what could be a difficult recovery.’ Reportedly, there were ‘internal discussions about putting the president in a wheelchair, but they couldn’t do so until after the election.’ Ashley Williams, Deputy Assistant to the President, told the Committee she could not recall if such a discussion occurred,” the report stated.

Jill Biden’s Office Led

Anthony Bernal, chief of staff to First Lady Jill Biden, pleaded the Fifth Amendment when the committee asked if any unelected official or family members executed the duties of the president.

Zients confirmed to the committee that through Bernal, who sometimes spoke for the first lady “whether he’d spoken to her or not,” the inner-most circle of the Biden Administration and, by extension, the Oval Office ran through senior leaders of the First Lady’s office. As Joe Biden went downhill, Jill Biden was seen taking on presidential duties such as opening a cabinet meeting on Sept. 20, 2024 and making “substantial remarks” at that meeting. Or posting on social media that she was “Prepping for the G7,” which was not her job.

Deny The Problem  

The public noticed Biden’s decline, but when the White House was asked about it, officials denied the obvious and acted offended at the suggestion. The report notes that since the 2020 campaign, questions about Biden’s mental acuity were described as, “a disgusting smear tactic,” or “a false misleading conspiracy theory,” and “and incredibly offensive question.”

Note Cards Needed

Biden’s communications team wanted him to appear coherent and fully in control of his faculties, the report said, so they gave Biden “Extremely detailed cards (even for purposes of discussing his own son), increasing reliance on teleprompters to the point where Democratic donors expressed concerns, issuing talking points without direct discussion with the president.” Ordinarily, the executive would direct his team on the content of the message he intends to deliver.

Biden was given talking points explaining why he pardoned his son Hunter Biden, including questions and answers. Such as the question, “When did you decide to [pardon Hunter]? And the answer, “made the decision this weekend.”  

Easter Bunny Handler  

It must have been a bit trippy for confused Biden to look into the eyes of the Easter Bunny to get stage direction. Less than six months after O’Connor’s endorsement of Biden’s fitness, Special Assistant to the President Megan Hays, dressed as the Easter Bunny, interrupted Biden and ushered him away from reporters in an effort to avoid unscripted communications during the White House Easter celebration, the report said. It is hard to imagine another world leader taking direction from a large rabbit.

All these actions made the Unites States look weak. Anyone connected to the scheme to keep Biden in the White House and deny his mental decline has demonstrated their disdain for the U.S. and its people, and should never be appointed or elected to a federal position again.  



New Lawsuit Seeks DOJ Records On Biden-Era Official’s Role In Manhattan’s Get-Trump Lawfare



A good government group is seeking Justice Department records about a Biden-era official’s role in Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg‘s lawfare against then-candidate Donald Trump.

In its Wednesday lawsuit, the Center to Advance Security in America (CASA) requested the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to compel the DOJ to hand over documents related to Matthew Colangelo‘s transition from the department to the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office in December 2022. As The Federalist’s Margot Cleveland previously reported, Colangelo — who was the third highest-ranking official at the Biden DOJ — left the agency to help “jump start” Bragg’s prosecution of Trump ahead of the 2024 presidential election.

“In late 2022, former DNC operative, Obama donor, and top official in the Biden DOJ Matthew Colangelo was hand-picked to join the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office to politically prosecute President Trump,” CASA Director James Fitzpatrick told The Federalist. “The American people deserve to know if there were any politically charged discussions at the Biden DOJ involving Colangelo’s hiring.”

In May 2024, CASA filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the Biden DOJ seeking agency communications and records from Jan. 20, 2021-Dec. 10, 2022, related to Colangelo’s resignation. The group specifically noted that Colangelo’s move from the DOJ to Bragg’s office “creates concerns for conflict of interest from the Biden Administration, especially in light of the case being pursued during the course of the upcoming presidential election.”

In its Wednesday lawsuit, CASA claimed that the DOJ “acknowledged receipt” of its FOIA request several days after it was filed, “indicated that the records sought require a search in and/or consultation with another Office, and that it would need to extend the time limit to respond to the Request beyond the ten additional days provided by the statute.” According to the good government group, however, “over 526 days have elapsed since the federal government received CASA’s request, yet DOJ still has not made a determination with respect to it.”

“DOJ has not produced responsive documents to CASA, has not communicated to CASA the scope of the documents it intends to produce or withhold — along with the reasons for any such withholding — and has not informed CASA of its ability to appeal any adverse portion of its determination,” the lawsuit reads. “Given these facts, DOJ has not met its statutory obligations to provide the requested records for the request.”

CASA has requested the D.C. District Court to order the DOJ to “to produce, within ten days of the Court’s order, or by other such date as the Court deems appropriate, any and all non-exempt records responsive to [its] request and an index justifying the withholding of all or part of any responsive records withheld under claim of exemption.” The group further asked the court to award it “reasonable attorney’s fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred” throughout the legal battle, as well as “other such relief as the Court deems just and proper.”


‘100 Times Worse Than Watergate’: 3 Biggest Revelations From Latest ‘Arctic Frost’ Document Dump


Docs further reveal how Biden weaponized the DOJ and FBI to tap GOP phones and spy on conservative groups and individuals, while Sen. Ron Johnson warns ‘sabotage’ is ongoing.



Sen. Chuck Grassley revealed Wednesday that former President Joe Biden’s corrupt Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) compiled what’s being described as an “enemies list” of Republicans to target, including through wiretapping the phones of several high-ranking Republicans as part of their “get-Trump” lawfare.

Grassley revealed more than 1,700 pages of documents provided by whistleblowers, shining further light on the “Arctic-Frost” inquiry. Arctic Frost was an investigation led by the Biden administration to, as The Federalist’s Margot Cleveland explained, “target Republicans in key battleground states.” Then FBI Director Christopher Wray sent a memorandum to then-Attorney General Merrick Garland claiming that “fraudulent certificates of electors’ votes were submitted to the Archivist of the United States” for Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin. Wray also asserted that these votes were part of a grand conspiracy to obstruct the certification of the 2020 election.

Jack Smith relied on this investigation as the basis for his anti-Trump lawfare, through which he attempted to both put the then-former president in jail and spy on the entire Republican political apparatus. 

Grassley made public the 197 subpoenas sought by Smith.

Biden DOJ/FBI Wiretapped Ted Cruz’s Landline

According to Grassley, “Smith secretly obtained phone record data from at least eight senators and one congressman.”

“I’ve recently been informed by Verizon that at least 11 members with Verizon accounts were affected. That includes a hardline for Sen. Cruz’s office and a staffer’s cellphone for former Sen. Loeffler,” Grassey continued, adding that Smith “backed down” from subpoena requests placed to AT&T for Cruz’s cellphone records after the company “challenged” the legality of the subpoenas.

Cruz said that AT&T’s counsel advised the company not to comply with the subpoena because it violated the “speech and debate clause of the Constitution.” Cruz said that the subpoena was accompanied by an order from Judge James E. Boasberg. Boasberg has been issuing nationwide injunctions to stop Trump from implementing the mandate given to him by voters.

“Judge Boasberg issued an order to AT&T and signed that order prohibiting AT&T from informing me of this subpoena for at least one year. And Judge Boasberg gave the basis for that order, and I’m going to quote from the order Judge Boasberg signed: ‘The court finds reasonable grounds to believe that such disclosure will result in destruction of, or tampering with evidence, intimidation of potential witnesses, and serious jeopardy to the investigation.'”

Cruz says there is “precisely zero evidence to conclude that I am likely to destroy or tamper with evidence or to intimidate potential witnesses. Zero evidentiary basis for that. This order is an abuse of power. This order is a weaponized legal system.”

Cruz said that he did not have access to the subpoenas issued for the other senators’ information. Sen. Marsha Blackburn said her records were successfully subpoenaed from Verizon, and Verizon complied.

Kash and Bondi ‘Being Sabotaged From Within’

Sen. Ron Johnson said there is concern that FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi are being “sabotaged from within” but did not elaborate further.

“The records we are now making public … were not obtained from the agency. They were obtained through a whistleblower. So my first point is: We need more whistleblowers. We need people, men and women inside these agencies, who have integrity, who want to see the integrity and credibility of the Department of Justice, of the FBI, restored. Come forward. Because right now I think Kash Patel [and] Pam Bondi are overwhelmed by all the mess they’re trying to clean up. … There’s still partisan actors burrowed in, trying to sabotage their efforts.”

Biden’s FBI/DOJ Sought to Spy on Entire GOP

The whistleblower documents also show that Biden’s FBI subpoenaed bank records, donor lists, and emails of numerous major conservative organizations and leaders, including Trump’s campaign, the RNC, Save America PAC, America First Policy Institute, the Conservative Partnership Institute, and MyPillow.

According to Cruz, “Twenty percent of the Republicans in the United States Senate were the target of this fishing expedition.”

“They did so in complete contravention of the Constitution, of separation of powers, of the speech and debate clause, of free speech, of basic rights of privacy,” Cruz continued.