Thursday, October 23, 2025

Forget the Nonsense – Republicans Are Not Facing Electoral Death in 2026


Don’t fear the Electoral Reaper in the 2026 midterms – the GOP just needs to be prepared to give it more cowbell. Look, we’ve been told again and again and again that we will certainly lose the House, but those are the same experts who told us we couldn’t close the border without throwing it wide open, that peace in the Middle East was impossible without surrendering to 7th-century savages, and that some women have a penis. What they don’t know would fill volumes. Stop listening to them. We’re looking good in 2026. We just need more cowbell.

For the folks in the slow seats, “cowbell” means hard work. The bad guys are on the back foot, but they are as energized as 80-year-old boomers can be, so we need to outwork them.

In the House, we’re not looking perfect, but we are looking strong. The moving parts are moving in our direction. It can certainly go bad. The historical trends are doubtless against us, though in 2002, George W. Bush managed to add seats in a first-term midterm. Of course, this isn’t a first term for Donald Trump. Depending on who you ask, it’s the second or third. But he’s broken all the rules before, and there’s no reason why those old rules must apply here. As Laurence of Arabia memorably proclaimed, “Nothing is written.”

It’s on us to win this thing, and we can.

Gerrymandering is going to help. The proper position on gerrymandering is to be actively in favor of it. After all, the designation of legislative districts is a quintessential political act, so no one should demand that legislatures shouldn’t act politically to create those districts. When you act politically, you should act to advantage your own side. There’s nothing wrong with that. In fact, the real problem is when legislators fail to act in their constituents’ interests.

That’s why I have no problem morally with my governor, Gavin Hairstyle, deciding to change all the rules that they had previously exploited to different rules that they can now exploit even more to utterly shaft the remaining Republican remnant in the golden-brown state. Aesthetically, I find his fake babbling about how disenfranchising Republicans is necessary to protect Our Democracy – geez, weasel, have the cajones to admit you’re just trying to win. Politically, I don’t like it. I don’t like anything that helps my opponents. But I’m not going to cry about it like a little sissy or a Democrat, to the extent those are different (sissies remain a vital component of the Democrat coalition).

Gerrymandering is just a thing. And was also just a thing when New York and Illinois did it to us. And it’s just going to be a thing when Texas does it to them, and when North Carolina, Missouri, Kansas, Indiana, and Florida do it to them. The difference is we’re not going to whine about how democracy is dead and how we don’t like kings and otherwise shred our dignity as we shred our garments, mourning lost seats.

The gerrymandering war will be won by the Republicans, and we will get several more seats out of it, which will help. But wait. Just the other day, the Voting Rights Act went before the Supreme Court. If that goes down, say goodbye to all the specially carved-out Black Democrat districts that litter the South, because the Democrats’ version of the Voting Rights Act requires states to create Black Democrat voting districts. There may be up to 20 of them, and they seem likely to go “Poof!” States like Louisiana and Georgia can then get in on the gerrymandering act and get rid of these moral and constitutional abominations, creating instead safe, red districts. If this happens, the Democrats are completely screwed. Now, you’ll hear that this is the end of democracy because, apparently, democracy requires – and I’m checking my notes here – that there be districts designed to favor one race and also favor one specific political party. If that’s democracy, count me out. "Yes Kings," if it means we get legislative representation without regard to race.

Now, on to the politics. Forget the shutdown – now that Trump’s getting the troops paid, no one but deadbeat federal employees cares. The big issue in 2026 will be the economy. That’s really what will make the difference for both the House and the Senate. If the economy is good —and it is — we win. If you have a 401(k), things are already looking good. The elections are a little over a year away, but the other trends are positive. The economy could make or break the House majority, but even a major economic downturn is unlikely to shift power in the Senate, given the map and how they are flailing so far.

Yeah, I know, the Democrats are all very excited about their retread candidates, but it’s not going to work. They are going with stone losers. Here’s a non-comprehensive summary—we’ll get granular as the election season heats up, but you can already see the trends.

One trend is to go crusty. In Ohio, they’ve defrosted Sherrod Brown to run again. Brown, a Buckeye State Bolshevik who got punted from office by Bernie Moreno, is already losing union endorsements to the Republican senator, Jon Husted, who was appointed after JD Vance became our vice president. A Democrat in Ohio who can’t even get the union guys to support him? Once that was about as likely as J.B. Pritzker passing up a Danish, but it’s happening. I guess union guys hate pervs skeeving on their daughters in the locker rooms, too.

Then there’s the urge to try to elect left-wing loons. In the schizophrenic state of Maine, you’ve got an admitted communist, Graham Platner, who likes to sell himself as an outdoorsy fisherman guy – there’s nothing worse than hicklibs – taking on the ancient former governor, Janet Mills. Oh, he’s also an expert on how black people tip. And he's shocked to find the Nazi death’s head tattoo on his chest is a Nazi death’s head tattoo – hey, that could happen to anybody! He clearly thought it was a different kind of death’s head tattoo.

Well, let the Dems fight. It’s Young Pinko With Baggage v. Slightly Less Pinko Crusty. After one wins the nom, Susan Collins —the hardest-working retail politician in America and a moderate Republican perfectly suited for the Maple Syrup State —will punt the survivor through the goalposts of failure.

Down in Texas, there’s a three-way primary among the Republicans. Any of them will beat any of the Democrats. Colin Allred is Cory Booker in a Stetson, and that little weasel guy who looks like Pete Buttigieg, except he talks about church all the time, is not going anywhere, either. The best that can be said about them is that none is a furry like Beto.

In Georgia, we have a GOP free-for-all to go against Jon Ossoff. This is one of the Republican turnover opportunities, so we need to take this naturally GOP seat back from the Dems. But there is drama. Brian Kemp is promoting some guy who’s a college football coach in some other state. Why? That guy is going nowhere. We need to get serious—Representative Mike Collins, whom I had a chance to interview the other day on The Hugh Hewitt Show, seems like a smart guy. And, on the plus side, Marjorie Taylor Greene didn’t get in the race after Trump told her to butt out, something she is certain to blame on the Jews and their mind-control lasers.

In North Carolina, Michael Whatley is running to replace Thom Tillis. North Carolina is trending blue, and it looks good for us. Even if I didn’t know anything about Whatley, and I do know about Whatley – he was head of the RNC when it became successful – I would support him. I would literally support either Barkey or Bitey over the lefty former governor the Dems will nominate; in fact, I’d support my dogs over Thom Tillis, too. That goof won’t be missed.

In Kentucky, the ridiculous Amy McGrath—picture a middle-aged Greta Thunberg who won’t stop tweeting lame Dem talking points— is running again. She wasted about $90 million last time trying to beat Cocaine Mitch, and let’s hope she does just as well this time. Several folks are running for the Republican nomination. David Cameron lost the governor’s race last time; that’s bad. Andy Barr is a McConnell clone (without the tactical savvy) who is softer than tofu; if you love amnesty, he’s your boy. Hopefully, they will nominate Nate Morris, who is hardcore, and he’ll clean her clock.

There are a bunch of other races up in the Northeast and the Midwest, and we might pull off an upset. The Democrats’ defense of those seats will suck in a lot of Democrat money to fend off a loss. To have any chance, they must win them all. The Republicans have the advantage because the best money is the money spent on offense.

So don’t worry. It’s over a year out, and so far, the numbers are in our favor. The correlation of forces is in our favor. History is not, but remember that history is only a suggestion, a hint, a possibility. It’s not determinative. We are not condemned to a House run by SeΓ±or Hakeem Jeffries or a Senate run by that guy who can’t even grill a burger. Think positive and give us more cowbell – that’s how we win.



Podcast and entertainment thread for Oct 23

 


Hope you know how to stay warm in these cold days ahead.

Western Civilization Depends on Men and Masculinity


For centuries, men built and defended Western civilization -- from its farms and cities to its laws, its art, and its moral order. But in just a few generations, that foundation has been shaken. Masculinity, once honored as the engine of strength, protection, and leadership, is now treated as a social problem. The very qualities that sustained families, communities, and nations are being redefined as “toxic.” Today, masculinity itself is treated as something to be “reformed” or “re-educated.”

What happened? How did the very qualities that built the modern world become objects of suspicion and ridicule?

The truth is simpler: Western civilization depends on men and masculinity -- and it cannot survive without them.

The Quiet War on Manhood

Since the mid-20th century, Western culture has undergone an ideological shift that redefined traditional masculinity as something outdated, even dangerous. The cultural shifts of the 1960s promised liberation but gradually replaced personal responsibility and family order with self-gratification and state dependence. Where strong families once formed the backbone of the West, an alliance of ideological radicalism and excessive consumerism has turned both men and women into disconnected individuals -- easier to manipulate, easier to control.

This erosion of masculine identity didn’t happen by accident. It was shaped through decades of social conditioning that cast male authority as oppressive, fatherhood as optional, and discipline as cruelty. In recent years, even government agencies have launched programs to ‘redefine’ masculinity, echoing language once confined to activist circles. The result is a culture where men are encouraged to suppress their natural instincts -- their drive to lead, protect, and provide -- in favor of emotional conformity. The modern man is expected to apologize for being male.

That truth -- the structural bias against authentic masculinity -- became the foundation for my book, The War on Men: How the New Gender Politics Is Undermining Western Civilization. Written not in resentment, but in plain clarity, it exposes how systems once meant to protect families and society have been twisted by new gender politics.

The Vanishing Father

The collapse of fatherhood lies at the heart of this crisis. A century ago, the father served as the moral and practical anchor of the household. Today, millions of boys grow up without one. The results are measurable: higher rates of crime, depression, and academic failure.

Without fathers, young men struggle to define what strength, honor, and leadership even mean. The vacuum is filled by media caricatures -- the bumbling sitcom dad, the toxic aggressor, or the passive nice guy who never offends anyone.

It’s no coincidence that as male leadership has declined, so has family stability. When men are removed from their natural roles, the entire social structure weakens. Feminist academics and bureaucrats claimed this would “liberate” women. Instead, it left both sexes adrift -- men deprived of a clear sense of purpose, and women burdened with expectations that conflict with their natural strengths.

From Strength to Shame

Modern education and media condition young men to doubt traits that were once honored -- assertiveness, risk-taking, competitiveness, and stoicism. The ideal of the strong, self-reliant man has been replaced with the sensitive conformist who fears giving offense more than failing his responsibilities.

This inversion of values has consequences far beyond gender. A society that discourages strength and rewards compliance eventually loses its ability to defend itself -- morally, culturally, and even militarily.

Civilizations rise when men are encouraged to lead; they fall when men are shamed for doing so.

The Spartan Mindset

What does authentic masculinity look like today? It’s not about wealth, dominance, or bravado. True manhood begins with integrity -- the courage to face reality, take responsibility, and act according to principle, even when it’s unpopular.

The ancient Spartans understood this. They didn’t chase comfort or approval; they pursued mastery over themselves. That’s the essence of the “Spartan mindset”: realism over optimism, truth over illusion. Modern culture tells men to “stay positive,” to avoid confrontation, and to seek validation. But strength is not built in comfort. A man becomes strong by facing hardship honestly -- by learning discipline, self-control, and purpose in the face of adversity. When it comes down to optimism or pessimism, I always choose realism.

A Feminized Culture

Western civilization has become, in many ways, a feminized culture. Emotional comfort is prioritized over truth; feelings take precedence over facts. Public debate is now policed by fear of offense. The phrase “my rights don’t end where your feelings begin” has never been more relevant.
Even federally, in January 2025 the U.S. government declared it a matter of state policy that there are only two sexes and that gender ideology must be rejected -- a formal backlash to decades of shifting norms around masculinity and gender.

This preference for sentiment over reason has spread through politics, media, and education. Policies are increasingly designed not for long-term stability but to appease emotion-driven constituencies and align with UN-style governance models that echo centralized planning. The result is widespread moral uncertainty and civic stagnation.

The Masculine Virtues We Lost

Courage, restraint, loyalty, and honor -- these virtues once defined manhood. Today, they’re rarely taught in a school system dominated by new gender politics, let alone celebrated. Yet these are precisely the qualities that sustain a civilization. Masculinity, properly understood, is grounded not in domination but in responsibility -- the duty to protect, provide, and uphold truth even when it’s costly. The decline of those virtues has produced generations of anxious, uncertain men -- products of a system that rewards compliance over conviction.

In schools, boys are medicated for restlessness; in DEI workplaces, masculine ambition is branded as aggression; in media, masculinity is reduced to parody. It’s no wonder so many young men feel lost.

A culture that derides masculine virtue produces dependents, not leaders.

Reclaiming Balance

The solution isn’t a return to harshness or domination, as critics of ‘patriarchy’ often claim. What’s needed is balance -- a renewed respect for the masculine and feminine as complementary forces, not rivals. Men and women are different by design, and that difference is the foundation of family and community life. Denying that truth has made both sexes less happy, less stable, and less fulfilled.

The West needs men who are strong without tyranny, disciplined without indifference, and honest without apology. The current generation of men have been denied what their ancestors took for granted -- that freedom and civilization depend on masculinity, courage, responsibility, and the willingness to lead.

The Way Forward

It seems clear that the revival of authentic masculinity won’t come from a political culture dominated by new gender politics -- so where should men look instead? The revival of masculinity begins in personal conduct. Every man can reclaim strength by mastering himself -- by rejecting the passivity and self-pity our culture encourages. Masculinity isn’t harmful; it’s essential. The real harm lies in the ideology that teaches men to distrust their natural instincts.

When men rediscover purpose and principle, families heal, communities strengthen, and nations endure. The West was built by men unafraid to lead, to protect, and to speak the truth -- and it will endure only if such men rise again. If Western civilization is to survive, it must once more honor, strengthen, and respect its men.



🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Robert De Niro Is One Of The Worst Old Men In America Today


What De Niro ‘ just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard … Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it.’



The college TV station in the small town where I grew up used to hold an annual telethon in early December. Great cause, nearly unwatchable programming. 

The telethon in its heyday was a 36-hour marathon of tone-deaf Christmas carolers, hippie unicyclists, discordant high school rock bands, quilting demonstrations, saccharine children’s numbers from the local dance studio, and lots of awkward interviews with telethon sponsors conducted by sweaty university Communications majors in ill-fitting tuxedos and evening gowns. At 3:30 a.m., literally anyone and anything could end up on local cable access — including my own discordant high school band. 

In many ways, MSNBC is like a never-ending campus station telethon. It’s unwatchable with no redeeming value. It’s only cause: Giving air time to a cavalcade of fire-breathing leftists, the next more crazy than the last. All shouting into the same small echo chamber of viewers who consume the cable “news” channel’s hatred for Donald Trump the same way bent-needle junkies take their drug: deep in their veins. 

Robert De Niro, like the leftist network he loves, has Trump Derangement smack pulsating through his veins and brain 24-7. So, that makes him qualified to talk politics on MSNBC. 

‘Those People’

The Academy Award winner joined the gang at The Weekend Sunday night to share his tinfoil hat thoughts on President Trump, the shutdown, and the “No Kings” protests populated by people who say they are all-in on representative democracy — at least until someone they don’t like gets elected. 

The guy who has spent most of his life working in the Hollywood bubble and living in the New York bubble lamented that the rubes in “fly-over country” aren’t tuned in to leftist propaganda peddlers like MSNBC. De Niro acknowledged that he was not reaching “those people” on the liberal cable channel. Who’s he calling those people? The 77.3 million Americans who voted for Trump in an electoral butt whooping of the Democrat Party’s unqualified stand-in candidate for a senile old man and his autopen. 

Speaking of senile: 

“They’re used to seeing Trump do his stuff and they talk and they listen,” De Niro said of the MAGA movement. “And that’s the truth to them because they don’t listen to anything else. Somewhere way out in the Midwest somewhere, out west, in certain places, rural places, that’s the truth because he [Trump] gets the airtime more.” 

What kind of airtime is the president getting? 

In the first 100 days of his second term, the three major broadcast news channels pounded Trump and his administration with 92 percent negative coverage, according to media tracker NewsBusters. The networks, by contrast, delivered mostly positive coverage (59%) about Joe Biden and his administration over the four years the Democrat was in the White House, NewsBusters reports. The coverage hasn’t gotten any fairer for Trump. 

De Niro believes “we” — leftist lunatics like him — “need more airtime” to “push against” Trump and “those people” who voted for him. If only … the actor sighed. 

“I wish, you can’t do this in some ways (big sigh), if the news media could find ways to kind of ignore or tamp down nonsense from Trump, it’s just total nonsense,” De Niro told his MSNBC pals. 

The “news media,” the corporate clowns who have buried whatever journalistic integrity they once had in a shallow grave, do nothing but “tamp down” news that doesn’t fit into their narrative. That tamping, by the way, is what the U.S. government did to facts and opposing viewpoints on everything from the state of our elections to a mass hysteria pandemic during Biden’s reign. Have a “No Kings” rally for that — the slaughter of the truth over four long years under Democrat control.  

‘They Have to be More Afraid’

De Niro spent much of his time on MSNBC doing what he has done best in his mob movies: promoting violence. If Republicans don’t stop following Trump and start fearing the Marxist mob, they better look out, he warned. 

“Politicians are either going to realize, you face the wrath of Trump or the wrath of the people,” the old Jacobin declared. “They have to be more afraid of the people and realize this is not good.” 

The “people,” or the minority of Americans backing the far left’s insurrection, have to keep fighting because, according to the movie star, Trump will not leave the White House when his second term is over. He “set it up,” De Niro said, with adviser Stephen Miller, whom the actor calls the “Goebbels (or Gebbles, as he pronounced Nazi Germany propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels’ name) of the cabinet” and a “Nazi.” Miller is Jewish

De Niro’s heroes? New York Communist mayoral candidate Zohran Kwame Mamdani, whom De Niro called “Humdani.” He’s not quite sure who he’s going to vote for in next month’s election, but De Niro believes Mamdani “means well.”  He likes California Gov. Gavin Newsom and a litany of Democrats born without a conscience or who lost theirs in the political wars. 

“I like [House Minority Leader] Hakeem Jeffries ..  [Sen. Chuck] Schumer, Adam Schiff, I mean they’re all great, strong, I like what [New York Attorney General] Leticia James is doing. She’s saying, ‘This is it. I will not be taken down by this person. I’m not afraid of him.’ And God bless her for that,” the octogenarian celebrity said. James, who used her office to go after Trump, is facing felony charges in a real estate case. 

De Niro said a lot of things during the long and painful MSNBC interview. Mostly he spoke in broken sentences and repeatedly interrupted his hosts in one rant after the other. I regret having watched this time-filler. 

I wanted to tell Bob De Niro what the principal and academic decathlon judge from the 1995 Adam Sandler comedy Billy Madison disgustedly said to the main character:  “What you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.”  

De Niro on MSNBC made me long for 3:30 a.m. college telethon programming.



Democrats Keep Trying To Offer An ‘Alternative’ To Trump. That’s Their Problem



Two recent articles have a couple quotes from prominent Democrat strategists that inadvertently capture the filthy rut the party continues to wallow in. They even use the same word.

In The Hill on Monday, campaign strategists Doug Schoen and Carly Cooperman declared that “the heart of Democrats’ dilemma is an inability to articulate their own path forward” and a failure at “communicating their own credible and attractive alternative” to President Trump’s agenda. Over in The New York Times one day before, pollster Celinda Lake almost identically said, “The biggest thing the Democrats need to do is not the negative but the positive. We have to offer an alternative.”

Sounds like a plan! So what’s the “alternative” to securing the southern border, cracking down on inner-city crime, and promoting affordable energy production? What’s the alternative to using real U.S. muscle to force a peace deal in the Middle East? What’s the alternative to insisting foreign leaders open their markets to American-made products, lest they pay penalties? (And in the meantime, they certainly are paying.) What’s the alternative to a military that prioritizes fighting capability over “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion”?

We’ve seen what the alternative to all of that looks like. It was called the Biden years. Or, if you made less than $250,000 per year, you might have more commonly known it as “Is this hell?”

Here’s an idea for Democrats though: Not everything needs an alternative. A lot of problems, maybe most of them, have one practical solution. To pretend otherwise is to play with real people’s money, their safety, and that of their families. It turns out it’s not very popular to do that.

It’s also not popular to pretend that problems aren’t problems. Recall all of 2024 when Democrat leaders, plus their very helpful friends in the dying media, swore that crime, prices, and illegal border crossings were “down.” That was a lie or, if we feel like being generous, it was misleading. Whatever you want to call it, it didn’t work for Democrats. They lost, and the party remains historically unpopular. Yes, even after calling every attempt by the president to fix those very problems “fascist.”

Democrats can keep spinning their wheels, trying to concoct an “alternative” solution to a problem that only has one. Or they could not and just be pro-American for a change.



Dems Finally Get Their Own Nazi...and Their Reactions Have Been a Mess



What a nightmare for Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner, who got hurled into the furnace this week after it was revealed he has Nazi-themed tattoos. These aren’t allegations; he admitted to it. He claims that he got them on a night of drunkenness while he served in the US Marine Corps in Eastern Europe. When you’re go-to line is ‘I’m not a secret Nazi,’ a Chernobyl-like public relations meltdown is on the horizon. The tattoo is located on his chest (via Axios):

Platner drew the backing of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) as an anti-establishment outsider, but his campaign is already trying to clean up recently resurfaced Reddit posts where he espoused offensive views about Black people and sexual assault victims. 

Platner's campaign shared video with Pod Save America of him singing shirtless that exposed a skull tattoo on his chest that resembles the "Totenkopf," a symbol used by Hitler's Schutzstaffel (SS). 

The move was intended to get ahead of opposition research, and the GOP's Senate campaign arm seized on the images, accusing Platner of having a "Nazi tattoo."

Driving the news: Platner said in an interview with Tommy Vietor of Pod Save America that was released on Monday that the video was from his brother's wedding, where he lip-synced Miley Cyrus' "Wrecking Ball." 

"I am not a secret Nazi," Platner told Vietor, adding that he got the tattoo in Croatia while deployed and was "very inebriated." Platner said he and his fellow Marines chose "a terrifying looking skull and crossbones." 

Oh, it gets better—he had it removed:

My Lord, drop out, man.  

The reactions have been both hilarious and disturbing. There have been elite memes mocking this man, but also a slew of Democrats and liberal hosts who have defended the Nazi tattoos. It’s almost as if they’re frustrated; they got owned after trying to cast Secretary of War Pete Hegseth as a Nazi for his Celtic cross tattoos. It is also a bit predictable that liberals wouldn’t know a real Nazi since they’re so historically illiterate. If Platner were a Republican, you bet this would be more of a story, but he got caught, he’s confessed, and now there’s only one thing for these people to do: defend this stuff. 

Ex-MSNBC host Krystal Ball tweeted, “For me personally I’ll take a candidate with a regrettable tattoo over one who has steadfastly supported a genocide.” 

Yeah, peak idiocy, and she got wrecked over it. The “regrettable tattoo” only has its links to the most infamous genocide, but whatever.