Tuesday, October 14, 2025

Kamala Harris Reveals Joe Biden Isn't Taking Her Phone Calls



There was no love lost between the Kamala Harris campaign team and the Biden White House. During the election, tensions between the camps ran high and afterwards, it was clear there was still some ill will.

In her memoir, "107 Days," Kamala Harris recounts how Joe Biden placed an angry phone call to her right before her debate with Donald Trump:

Moments before a make-or-break debate with Donald Trump, Kamala Harris got an unexpected phone call: It was a peeved President Joe Biden, demanding to know why she had been bad-mouthing him to donors.

The call left Harris rattled at a critical moment in her abbreviated campaign and highlighted her at-times strained relationship with her boss, the former vice president writes in a new memoir released Thursday.

“My head had to be right. I had to be completely in the game,” she recalled. “I just couldn’t understand why he would call me, right now, and make it all about himself.”

After leaving office, it was revealed that Joe Biden was battling an aggressive form of prostate cancer that metastasized to the bone. This week, outlets reported that the former president began radiation treatment for the cancer.

MSNBC's Eugene Daniels asked Harris about Joe Biden and his treatment. Turns out the Biden's aren't keen on taking Kamala's phone calls.

"I have not talked to him. I just left him a message," Kamala said.

It is totally on script.



Kremlin Mouthpiece Warns US Sending Tomahawk Missiles to Ukraine May End Badly


RedState 

In this episode of "The Kremlin Craves Attention"...

As most of the world continues to heap due praise on President Donald Trump for his role in brokering the historic peace agreement between Israel and Hamas, it appears that Vladimir Putin and his fellow wanna-be-Stalins in the Kremlin are feeling a bit left out. 

Yep, it's like that desperate kid in class who waves his arms wildly, begging the teacher, "Pick me! Pick me!"

Former Russian president and current Putin mouthpiece Dmitry Medvedev puffed out his chest on Monday and warned that Trump's recent musings about potentially supplying Ukraine with long-range Tomahawk missiles if Moscow continues its war against Ukraine might end badly for everyone, especially for Trump.

Incidentally, I was reminded of Barney Fife as I read Medvedev's faux threats.

Medvedev, a hardline hawk who appears to enjoy taunting Trump on social media, argued that once Tomahawk missiles are launched, no one can tell whether they’re carrying nuclear warheads or conventional explosives. 

"How should Russia respond? Exactly!" Medvedev pontificated on Telegram, suggesting that Moscow's response would be nuclear. 

Is it too soon to say, "Play stupid games, win stupid prizes"?

Surely, you may be thinking, "Putin and his comrades in the Kremlin wouldn't be that stupid, right?" 

Why? Because if Trump has shown the world anything, it's twofold: This president means what he says, and he doesn't hesitate to take strong actions when he believes the time is right. (Just ask the mad mullahs in Tehran.)

Here's more:

Trump said again Sunday that he might offer long-range Tomahawk missiles that could be used by Kyiv if Putin does not end the war in Ukraine.

"Yeah, I might tell him [Putin], if the war is not settled, we may very well do it," Trump said. "We may not, but we may do it... Do they want to have Tomahawks going in their direction? I don't think so."

Medvedev wrote: "One can only hope that this is another empty threat... Like sending nuclear submarines closer to Russia."

He was alluding to Trump's statement in August that he had ordered two nuclear subs to move closer to Russia in response to what he called "highly provocative" comments from Medvedev about the risk of war.

Putin has said supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks – which have a range of 2,500 km (1,550 miles) and could therefore strike anywhere within European Russia, including Moscow – would destroy relations between the United States and Russia.

Then, there's this: 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said Ukraine would deploy any U.S.-supplied Tomahawks solely for military targets, insisting they would not be used against Russian civilians.

Which begs the question: Would it be wise for Trump to trust Zelensky to keep his word? I don't know — but I sure wouldn't take it to the bank.

The Bottom Line

If Trump does end up supplying Ukraine with Tomahawk long-range missiles, the Kremlin will undoubtedly respond strongly — via official statements and perhaps in the media, only. 

Unless a Tomahawk missile actually strikes the Kremlin or is confirmed to carry a nuclear warhead, everyone knows the truth: Putin knows, Trump knows, and Putin knows Trump knows that Russia is not in a position to engage the United States in a nuclear war.

End of story? Let's hope so.



♦️𝐖³𝐏 𝐃𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝

 


W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Welcome to the W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Post whatever you got in the comments section below.

This feature will post every day at 6:30am Mountain time. 

 

Trump Is The Best Statesman Of Our Time Because He’s A Realist


If we are to properly set the conditions for a civilizational rebirth, we must accept that realistic rhetoric is the statecraft needed for renewal.



Last week, President Donald Trump announced that Israel and Hamas had signed off on the first phase of his Gaza peace plan — one of the most significant diplomatic breakthroughs in the Middle East in years. For our nation and the world, this was a moment of rare convergence, of both clarity and action.

While much of the world has grown accustomed to the language of stalemate and moral equivocation, Trump’s foreign policy achievements underscore a deeper principle that realism and prudence are themselves instruments of peace. His most recent address to the United Nations General Assembly reflected the same conviction. It was not the speech of a diplomat pandering to anyone, but of a statesman determined to reassert that truth-telling is the first act of order.

Instead of masking hard truths in euphemisms, Trump offered a direct summons — that candid, realistic assessments of the world must precede our return to civilizational greatness. His address exemplified the essence of statecraft: speaking what we know is true (what many dare not say) and turning uncomfortable realities into a foundation for decisive action. In Trump’s realism, the statesman’s first task is not to flatter but to prepare, not to admire decline but to arrest it.

More than once in his speech, Trump bluntly invoked the mass migration and energy crises of the West, telling Europe, “You’re destroying your heritage,” and plainly warning, “Your countries are going to hell.” Here, the president deliberately bound truth-telling to deterrence because, following that up, he addressed the cartels, saying, “We will blow you out of existence.” 

Far from just rhetoric, his words are a testament to the civic habits needed to preserve the West: fidelity to inheritance and the sacrificial courage to act on hard truths. This is about the art of rhetoric and even statecraft in a fallen world. There will always be evil, wrongs, and harsh realities to speak about. Statecraft is not about crafting the perfect phrase to win applause in a chamber of diplomats, but about shaping incentives, deterring aggression, and, especially now, safeguarding a people’s inheritance. President Trump understands that the U.N. stage is the opportune moment to state a realistic assessment of decay while summoning the resolve for repair.

For conservatives, the first habit — fidelity to inheritance — deserves particular praise. Though many debate whether Trump is a “real conservative,” his language in this speech is a reminder that to preserve the enduring things, you need to change. As Danny Kruger says, “the conservative remembers that the purpose of these practices is simply to sustain the community of the people, that the reason for change is to stay the same.” Stewarding one’s inheritance must resist the vanity of thinking we can improve everything by sheer managerial or technocratic will. Inheritance is a living trust, kept alive by institutions of family, faith, law, and civil society. It has endured because proud patriots across generations treated them as treasures to be handed forward, and especially sacrificed for. 

The second habit, sacrificial courage to act on hard truths, is key. When leaders like President Trump are willing to use blunt language — saying things like, “Your countries are going to hell,” because their decline is real — they are modeling the courage needed at every level of society to stand up against this.

We saw what happened when the U.S. had a leader with the opposite approach on the U.N. stage: Problems were not named and thus went unsolved. Delicate euphemism and abstractions in speech accelerate societal erosion. The Biden years marked in America what our allies in Europe experience regularly from Brussels bureaucrats. The point is not to delight in provocation but to catalyze responsibility. 

The immigration issue shows that forming humane legislation must first acknowledge the evil that cartels and human traffickers pose. Trump’s blunt recounting of horrors experienced by migrants on migration routes — including rape, slavery, death, and exploitation — revealed the unspeakable suffering inherent to mass migration that is often ignored. But it must be said, because it’s true, regardless of how unfashionable it is. 

We should not be surprised that President Trump’s rhetoric is used not just to defend border enforcement but also energy independence. As the president underscored, energy is another decisive test of whether we will choose realism or delusion. In naming the fallacy of embracing green-energy absolutism, he made clear that no amount of self-imposed pain in the United States or Europe will solve the problem if nations like China, the world’s largest polluter, continue to operate without accountability. This practical candor requires that we stop pretending unilateral sacrifice is virtue, which leftists across the West do, sacrificing their citizens’ needs for affordable, reliable power. 

Ultimately, Trump’s address was a call to arms of the spirit. In naming the crises plainly, he insisted that language match reality. His invitation to the world, particularly our Western allies, was to join in the battle for nationhood, embracing a posture that says, “Yes, our inheritance is in peril. No, we will not bow to fashionable despair. Yes, we will live up to the sacrificial task of stewarding what is good and true.” At its core, it’s a deeply Christian view — one that rejects despair and affirms instead that we are called to act even when the odds are daunting, trusting in providence and the moral arc of justice. 

If we are to properly set the conditions for a civilizational rebirth, we must accept that realistic rhetoric is the statecraft needed for renewal. Only then will the heirs of our age be able to pass forward a civilization worthy of the sacrifice of those who came before.



The Lib Reactions to Trump's Mideast Peace Deal Shows They Have No Pulse on Anything



They’re so angry. They don’t know what to do. Sure, some old school liberals are admitting that this is a great win for world peace, and credit should go to Donald Trump. Then again, we have the Bill Kristols and anti-Trump clowns of the world more fixated on pimping out their ‘No Kings’ rally this weekend, which will have zero effect on the Trump agenda or the shutdown. The United States clinched a signature foreign policy achievement with this deal to end the Gaza war, and these people have shown again that they have a pulse on the nation. 

Now, a few Democrats have given Trump credit, including former President Bill Clinton, former CIA Director Leon Panetta, and Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA). Still, liberal America writ large is having a fit that Trump got this done.  

Also, it’s not insane to say that Democrats will cave on the shutdown once this No Kings rally ends.

And, of course, John Fetterman knows what's up:

Last, you're going to see a bunch of Democrats acknowledge the deal, but in the most sanitized way possible that omits Trump's central role. He's the one who pitched the agreement in late September. 



President Trump Ushers in an Era of Peace With Historic Deal Signed in Egypt



President Trump on Monday signed a major peace deal in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, in front of more than 20 world leaders, characterizing the moment as the first step towards wider peace in the Middle East, calling on nations to "put the old feuds and bitter hatreds behind us."

"It took us 3,000 years to get to this point," Trump said. He will ensure that peace will become the new norm in the region.

"After two harrowing years in darkness and captivity, 20 courageous hostages are returning to the glorious embrace of their families," Trump said. "Twenty-eight more precious loved ones are coming home at last to rest in this sacred soil for all of time. And after so many years of unceasing war and endless danger, today the skies are calm, the guns are silent, the sirens are still, and the sun rises on a Holy Land that is finally at peace."

"This is not only the end of a war. This is the end of an age of terror and death, the beginning of the age of faith and hope and of God," Trump said. 

The President's speech in Egypt came shortly after he addressed the Knesset in Israel, where he received a standing ovation from Israeli officials, and encouraged Israel's president, Isaac Herzog, to pardon Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.


China Escalates Cyberattacks That Are Increasingly Hard To Detect


The Trump administration must take decisive action to hold the Chinese government and its affiliated hackers accountable for their cyber activities.



A Chinese hacking group is reportedly behind a significant espionage campaign targeting U.S. technology firms and legal services, highlighting a worrisome escalation in China’s cyber “Cold War” with the United States.

Since March 2025, Google’s Threat Intelligence Group and its cybersecurity subsidiary, Mandiant, have tracked suspicious activities, delivered over a backdoor malware known as “BRICKSTORM.” This sophisticated campaign is targeting a variety of sectors, including law firms, software-as-a-service providers, and other technology companies. Following extensive monitoring and analysis, Google has linked these hacking efforts to UNC5221, a long-suspected Chinese Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) actor, alongside other “threat clusters” associated with China.

The BRICKSTORM campaign is especially disturbing for two primary reasons. Firstly, it was crafted to ensure “long-term stealthy access” by embedding backdoors into targeted systems, enabling hackers to dodge conventional detection and response methods. The stealth campaign has proven so adept that, on average, these intruders remain undetected in targeted systems for nearly 400 days, as revealed by a Google report.

Secondly, the motivations behind these cyberattacks transcend the theft of trade secrets and national security data. Google suspects that these hackers are also probing for “zero-day vulnerabilities targeting network appliances,” as well as “establishing pivot points for broader access” to additional victims. This indicates a strategy to gather intelligence that could be pivotal to the Chinese military should tensions escalate between the U.S. and China.

Xi Jinping, the leader of Communist China, has consistently expressed his ambition for the nation to become a “cyber superpower.” With this goal in mind, the Chinese government has invested significant resources in building a formidable cyber army.

The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) considers cyber warfare to be a crucial aspect of both its defensive and offensive strategies, alongside traditional military forces. Cyberattacks are viewed as a cost-effective means to undermine an opponent’s will to fight by targeting its economic, political, scientific, and technological systems.

Thus, the PLA reportedly employs as many as 60,000 cyber personnel, ten times larger than the U.S. Cyber Command’s Cyber Mission Force. Additionally, a higher proportion of the PLA’s cyber force is dedicated to offensive operations compared to the United States (18.2 percent versus 2.8 percent).

Alongside China’s official cyber force, the Ministry of State Security and the Ministry of Public Security have adopted a “pseudo-private” contractor model that allows them to hire civilian hackers to conduct cyber espionage abroad while obscuring the Chinese government’s involvement.

Over time, the Communist regime has also significantly advanced its cyber operation capabilities. Today, China’s cyber operations are increasingly sophisticated, utilizing advanced tactics, techniques, and procedures to infiltrate victim networks, according to a U.S. government report.

The BRICKSTORM attack is part of a long series of high-profile cyberattacks originating from China in recent years. Between 2023 and 2024, Salt Typhoon, a Chinese hacking group linked to the Ministry of State Security accessed U.S. wireless networks operated by companies such as AT&T and Verizon, “as well as systems used for court-appointed surveillance.” This breach resulted in the compromise of telecommunication data for over a million American users, including individuals involved in both Trump’s and then-Vice President Kamala Harris’s presidential campaigns.

Volt Typhoon,” another Chinese hacking campaign, has successfully infiltrated critical American infrastructure networks, including those of power plants, pipelines, and water treatment facilities. This breach poses a serious threat by granting hackers the potential to shut down essential services, allowing them to disrupt our society at their discretion.

In a striking demonstration of the ongoing cyber threat from China, the U.S. Secret Service recently foiled a scheme that could have seriously impaired telecommunications and law enforcement operations in New York City during a crucial event attended by over 150 world leaders, including U.S. President Trump, at the United Nations’ annual meeting. U.S. officials have indicated that this troubling plot likely had ties to the Chinese government.

These hacking incidents act like live military drills but take place in the digital realm. Each breach enables Chinese hackers to gather intelligence and develop strategies for future disruption. In many cases, these cyberattacks pose a greater threat than traditional drills, inflicting real-time harm and compromising our future security.

The Chinese Communist Party’s deliberate and frequent infiltration of America’s civilian systems signifies its preparation for confrontation with the United States. This brazen posture reveals the Party’s intention to disregard established rules of engagement in any military conflict, aiming instead for maximum disruption and considerable casualties. This situation serves as a crucial wake-up call for us to fortify our defenses and reevaluate our approach to cyber warfare. Our response must be a united effort across society.

Private American companies often remain silent after becoming targets of Chinese hackers, fearing loss of market access in China or retaliation from the Chinese government. This collective silence has resulted in the loss of trillions of dollars in intellectual property, offering no protection to these businesses. It is essential for American companies to understand that their security and long-term viability depend on actively addressing Chinese cyberattacks. They must be willing to share information with other businesses and the U.S. government. By exposing more Chinese cyberattacks and fostering open communication, we can enhance our defenses and effectively counter future hacking operations from China.

The Trump administration must also take decisive action to hold the Chinese government and its affiliated hackers accountable for their cyber activities.

In March, the Department of Justice indicted 12 Chinese nationals, including two alleged officials from the Ministry of Public Security, for executing extensive cyber espionage operations on behalf of China. The DOJ’s indictment reveals that these state-sponsored hackers targeted not only Chinese dissidents in the United States but also more than 100 organizations based in the U.S., including defense contractors, health care systems, and even the U.S. Treasury, incurring millions of dollars in damages. While this indictment represents a significant step forward, it is clear that more is needed.

Furthermore, the Trump administration should integrate cybersecurity measures into its trade negotiations with Beijing. By doing this, it can raise the stakes for the Chinese Communist Party’s malicious cyberattacks, ultimately deterring these actions by leveraging U.S. advantages in other areas. This approach is essential for safeguarding our national security and the integrity of our economic and political system.