Saturday, October 4, 2025

American Journalism Doesn’t Report Facts; It Drives Preferred Narratives


More than at any time in my lifetime, I see Americans herded like so many cattle into one political/social chute or the other. Nothing more clearly illustrates that than juxtaposing how the media and special interest groups portray three different ethnocentric conflicts that share many of the same attributes.

The media and special interest groups exert significant influence over key narratives, leading to flawed conclusions, misguided actions, and manipulation on multiple levels. What’s at work is systemic bias so insidious and one-sided that from now on, I hope you question everything others take at face value.

Currently, there are three major wars occurring, all centered on the operational word of the 21st century: “Independence.” Here’s a handy-dandy chart showing the dominant narratives that control how Americans are expected to see the top three wars:

Samuel Johnson, the 18th-century English writer and moralist, was quoted as saying, “Nothing focuses the mind like impending death.”

This quote has been a favorite of mine for years because it separates the doers who risk life and limb from those who sit safely ensconced on their own butt pontificating on events about which they have no real knowledge and from which they will suffer zero risk if their prognostications are wrong. So it is with three different real-world savage fights that go on to this day.

I am a loyal and patriotic American, as are millions of other citizens. Of the three conflicts detailed above, we’ve witnessed the narrative push the Palestinians front and center on the compassion scale, even as I believe they own every horrible thing that has happened to them by cleaving to Hamas (which Gazans freely elected and strongly support) and openly celebrating the October 7 slaughter that saw 5,040 Jews killed, wounded, or taken hostage.

Let that sink in. Unlike the 2.13 million Arab Israeli citizens who make up 21.5% of Israel, Gaza’s residents chose to unite and revel in the death of human beings. With Israel logically responding (as Yahya Sinwar hoped would happen), Gaza’s residents are reaping the whirlwind of their choices. Israel is the only free country in the region, and Arabs vote in the Israeli Knesset, are judges, policemen, and soldiers with the same rights as other Israeli citizens. Few know these facts that fly in the face of the “narrative.”

The Kurds have also been attempting to gain their own homeland and have often used force. Major powers (e.g., the U.S., EU, Russia) support Kurdish autonomy in limited contexts but stop short of endorsing complete independence, fearing destabilization. The UN has turned its back on 30-45 million Kurds seeking their freedom. The constituencies for Palestinians are much better organized, promoted, and financially supported. Yet, the question that should be asked is: “To what extent is the situation different from that of the Palestinians?” My answer comes down to visibility and political framing.

Finally, the big one that dominates the news and has the most important ramifications—Ukraine. In the Budapest Memorandum, signed on December 5, 1994, Russia promised to respect and protect Ukraine’s independence and territorial integrity in exchange for Ukraine giving up its inherited Soviet nuclear arsenal. Russia now disavows this primary document, which was intended to ensure Ukraine’s territorial integrity forever.

America is frequently somewhat childlike in its perception of geopolitical realities, whereas Europe is more pragmatic. Today, how we view nationalism, our internal politics, and geopolitics is a function of the prism through which we view them. It cannot be overstated that we voluntarily gave up our independence, and millions of us are walking, talking points for the outlets we subscribe to, for their views and outcomes.

By allowing others to frame our arguments, supply us with our talking points, and “facts,” we give up our free will at the same time. What good is free speech if you no longer have free will? Historians will look back at this time with special emphasis on what happened to those under 45 years old. Framing leads to brainwashing, which in turn leads to actions that ultimately divert us from what’s life-affirming.

The media’s culpability (including social media) can no longer be doubted. Witness young people following TikTok antics resulting in their deaths for proof. We have passed the point of finger-pointing; we now simply need action to arrest our decline.

It pains me to say it, but the majority of the citizenry won’t sacrifice what is required to return to sanity. It is up to our government to right the ship and restore sanity to a country going down by the head. God grant us the miracle of good leadership and action that resets our clock for another 250 years, while we still have time, and, even more importantly, the will to do so.

God Bless America!



Podcast thread for Oct 4

 


Not everything is as scary as it looks. Sometimes you just need to take a deep breath and calm yourself. Then you find that things are still okay.

Democrats Are Lying Again


It’s day three of the federal government shutdown, and the Democrat Party is doing its best to gaslight Americans about their position on taxpayer-funded benefits for illegal aliens. 

In the lead-up to the federal government's funding running dry, Republicans on Capitol Hill voted to keep things open by passing a clean budget resolution. In years past, Democrats have done the same - more than a dozen times. But with Trump back in office for a second term, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, and the majority of their Party are demanding a reversal of Republican campaign deliveries codified by the Big Beautiful Bill (passed and signed into law over the summer). Liberals are holding services hostage until they get: the refunding of NPR, a re-institution of taxpayer funds for illegal aliens, and the revocation of a new $50 billion rural hospital fund. 

Democrats are lying about their plans, exposed by their own statements in recent days, and have repeatedly proven Republicans are right to hold the line. First, Democrats claimed funding of illegal alien healthcare wasn’t happening, and now, they admit that’s exactly what’s going on. 

"Democrats are demanding healthcare for everybody,” Democrat Congresswoman Maxine Waters says

"If that means we gotta shut this government down, so be it!” Shri Thanedar said at the airport on his way out of town in reference to healthcare subsidies for illegals. 

"The amount of money that actually is going towards people who are undocumented is such a small portion,” Democrat Congressman Ro Khanna argued during an interview with Fox Business. 

Their own bill to "keep the government open" has an explicit paragraph dedicated to healthcare for illegal aliens titled, "Alien Medicaid Eligibility." 

This, of course, didn’t start in 2025. Back when Obamacare was being debated and eventually passed in 2010, former Congressman Joe Wilson yelled out at the State of the Union that then President Barack Obama’s statement the new government program wouldn’t cover illegal aliens was a lie. Wilson was right. 

“The Working Families Tax Cut Act (WFTCA), signed into law by President Trump, contains the most important America First healthcare reforms ever enacted. The policies represent a comprehensive effort to address waste, fraud, and abuse to strengthen the healthcare system for the most vulnerable Americans, ensuring that taxpayer dollars are focused on American citizens and do not subsidize healthcare for illegal immigrants,” the White House states. “Democrats are demanding these reforms be repealed as a condition of keeping the government open for four weeks. This would result in the federal government spending nearly $200 billion on healthcare for illegal immigrants and non-citizens over the next decade—nearly enough to fund the entire Children’s Health Insurance Program over the same period—all while repealing reforms that strengthen care for the most vulnerable Americans.” 

“The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) prevents most immigrants from receiving Medicaid for five years. The drafters of Obamacare created a ‘special rule' to subvert this limitation by extending Obamacare premium subsidies to these same immigrants earning below the poverty line despite denying subsidies to poor Americans,” a White House memo continues. “The WFTCA repeals this 'special rule' for immigrants, once again ensuring non-citizens are not afforded a federal benefit not available to American citizens. Overturning this provision would result in $27.3 billion in federal premium subsidies for non-citizens over the next decade.”

In other words, federal dollars go to state healthcare programs and are then used for illegal alien healthcare. Republicans and the Trump administration are closing that loophole. 

Not to mention, every Democrat running for President in 2020 has openly and publicly supported taxpayer-funded and subsidized healthcare for illegal aliens. Their 2024 nominee, Kamala Harris, held the same position. 

The Democrats' credibility on this issue is completely nonexistent after Joe Biden’s four years of a wide-open border. Are we really supposed to believe Biden and the Democrats let in 20 million+ illegal aliens between 2020 and 2024 with no plans to give them taxpayer-funded healthcare? Come on.

Add all of this on top of outrageously dishonest claims from Democrats over the years about the illegal immigration issue. Including but not limited to:

  • The majority of “undocumented” immigrants (illegal aliens) are “law-abiding”
  • Crossing the border (without permission) isn’t a crime 
  • Illegals don’t vote
  • Illegals don’t get taxpayer-funded healthcare 
  • Worksites are crime-free
  • Exploitation of women and children, through sex and labor trafficking, is overblown
  • Cartels don’t run Chicago or other major U.S. cities
  • (Fraudulently) seeking asylum isn’t a crime 
  • Etc.

As the shutdown drags on, the political battle over reopening it intensifies by the hour. Normal Americans don't believe Democrats are against taxpayer funding for illegal alien healthcare. After all, they’ve been campaigning on it for years. 

Once again, Democrats are choosing to represent an illegal alien constituency rather than the interests of the American people. The government shutdown, harming taxpayers and the people who work for them, is their doing.



Populist billionaire Andrej Babiš wins Czech parliamentary election

 With Babiš’s victory the Czech Republic looks set to join Hungary and Slovakia in refusing support for Ukraine 

 

 

Populist billionaire Andrej Babiš has won the Czech Republic parliamentary elections, preliminary results show, but fallen short of the overall majority.

This win marks a political comeback for Babiš, who was prime minister from 2017 to 2021. He is set to put the country on a course away from supporting Ukraine and towards Hungary and Slovakia, who have taken a pro-Russian path. 

 With the votes from almost 98% of polling stations counted by the Czech statistics office, Babiš’s ANO (YES) party captured 35% of the vote, followed by the pro-western coalition of the prime minister, Petr Fiala, with 23.0%. The coalition defeated Babiš in the 2021 election. 

 

 

The two-day election filled 200 seats in the lower house of the Czech parliament. A group of mayors known as STAN, also a member of Fiala’s government, received 11.1% of the vote, with another ally of Fiala, the Pirates party, getting an 8.7% share.

Babiš, a self-proclaimed “Trumpist”, was all smiles and hailed the “historic result” as “the absolute peak” of his political career. Voter turnout for this election was high, at almost 69%.  

 

 

As Babiš’s ANO did not win the overall majority, the 71-year-old is expected to be invited to lead talks in forming a new coalition. He has already ruled out cooperation with any of the parties that have been in the government after the 2021 election.

His potential partners include the fringe parties Freedom and Direct Democracy (SPD), an anti-immigration party that won 7.9% of the vote, and a rightwing group called the Motorists, which received 6.8% 

 

 

He may need to form an alliance with both parties to be able to hold the overall majority. “We will definitely lead talks with the SPD and the Motorists and seek a single-party government led by ANO,” Babiš said.

During its election campaign, ANO advocated for increased welfare spending and a reduction in foreign aid, including donations to Ukraine. It also promised higher wages and pensions, and lower taxes and tax discounts for students and young families – all in hope of ending austerity.

An ally of the Hungarian leader, Viktor Orbán, Babiš has teamed up with a number of far-right parties in the Patriots for Europe group in the European parliament to challenge the mainstream direction of Europe’s policies, including decarbonisation.  

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/oct/04/populist-billionaire-andrej-babis-wins-czech-parliamentary-election   

 

 

🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Parents in Wisconsin Demand Answers After Conservative Students Segregated, Called ‘Nazis’


RedState 

It appears that leftist educators are at it again with shenanigans afoot in Dane County, Wisconsin, where parents are demanding answers after they said their conservative kids were segregated from their classmates, with some students calling them "Nazis."

First reports were coming in from Middleton and later from McFarland, with parents in both districts reporting that their high school students were forced to declare their political leanings.

Social Media Director for Moms for Liberty and Conservative activist Scarlett Johnson shared the news on X. She wrote that in the district in Middleton, "High school students were told to stand up in class, publicly declare their political affiliation, list their top issues, and post them on a hallway bulletin board. Students who identified as conservative were reportedly called 'n@zi's.'"

Mom's for Liberty shared a letter from one mom. 

It read:

A teenage girl in Middleton, WI was ordered to write her full name on a square in the high school hallway and publicly declare herself as Republican, Democrat, or Independent. She refused at first—because she had just overheard other students pointing at the 'red' squares and sneering: 'all those people are N@zis.'

She told the history teacher she was afraid. She explained what she'd heard. The teacher dismissed her and ordered her to participate anyway. She was described as shaking after being forced to 'out herself' politically in front of peers. This is intimidation, not education. This is what happens when schools trade neutrality for activism.

The post included a photo of the hallway bulletin board with the politics of the students on display for all to see and criticize.

The group also shared a letter from a parent in McFarland, reporting a similar situation.

The letter read:

"My daughter is a —-. All students had to stand up and declare their political affiliation and three issues. They are dividing our kids and making them uncomfortable."

"This isn't civics," Johnson wrote. "This is forced political disclosure. Our kids deserve classrooms free from political litmus tests. Parents deserve answers.

In another post, the conservative group shared a copy of the letter the students from the different school districts received about the class assignment.

RedState has reached out to both school districts and received a response from Middleton.

The response can be seen below. But to simplify it, they have decided to no longer make students publicly declare their political affiliation and have it on display for all to see.

Block quote:

"Our District is aware of concerns involving an activity in our Legislative Semester course at Middleton High School. As part of the semester-long government simulation process, students declared a party affiliation (Democrat, Republican, Independent) in order to form leadership structures and caucuses. For more information about the Legislative Semester, follow this link.  

Teachers of the course follow a prescribed curriculum, which has been taught at our high school for 12 years. It has long been a popular class among students that emphasizes student agency, civil discourse, and a collaborative approach.

Educators and administrators at Middleton High School had conversations with teachers, students, and parents. It’s important to note that any students who requested to opt out of the activity were able to do so. We also know that teachers involved in this course did not threaten or intimidate students. We are actively and aggressively investigating any reports of student-to-student harassment as a result of participation in the activity. We have extensive support systems in place through Student Services as well as our anonymous online reporting tool, Speak Up Speak Out.

Through our conversations with students and their families, we learned publicly declaring a party affiliation as part of the course has made some students uncomfortable. Because of safety concerns and student input, we have removed the political spectrum display where party declarations were documented. Going forward, students in the course will continue to be given the opportunity to make a party declaration privately.

During the 2024 election, President Donald Trump overwhelmingly won the young male voters. A huge reason for Trump's victory was the work done by the late Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, who conducted massive outreach on college campuses, making it cool to hold conservative views among younger generations.

Therefore, now it appears leftists will take that next step and try to crush this wave of conservatism in young minds. The good news is that it will backfire on them just as beautifully as their attempts to force us to say men are women and vice versa.



Antifa is the Identity-Obsessed Progeny of a Long Line of Brutal Marxist Terrorists


If Antifa is to be defeated, its godless utilitarianism and Marxist identity-obsession that excuses in advance any and every action taken by the ‘oppressed’ against the ‘oppressor’ must be entirely rejected.



In the wake of President Donald Trump designating Antifa a domestic terror organization, the corporate media have been quick to critique the move and question the feasibility and constitutionality of taking corresponding action. But an exploration of Antifa’s recent record of identity-obsessed violence and the dark history of its Marxist antecedents reveals an urgent need to counter the vicious left-wing movement.

Antifaschistische Aktion

The modern Antifa movement has its roots in the communist paramilitary arm that operated in Germany during the tumultuous years of the Weimar Republic: Antifaschistische Aktion. The Soviet-directed Communist Party of Germany (Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands — KPD) founded Antifaschistische Aktion in 1932, and historian William L. Shirer provides a window into the bloody nature of the conflict taking place in Germany’s streets in that year: “The storm troopers swarmed the streets seeking battle and blood and their challenge was often met, especially by the Communists. In Prussia alone between June 1 and 20 there were 461 pitched battles in the street which cost eighty-two lives and seriously wounded four hundred men.”

Yet the conclusion that Antifaschistische Aktion operated only to save Germany and Europe from Adolf Hitler’s National Socialists would be spurious. Instead, the original Antifa acted with “the explicit purpose of using street violence to disrupt the ability of Germany’s political center — the democratic liberals, moderates, and conservatives — to organize during the waning days of the Weimar Republic,” as Kyle Shideler, director and senior analyst for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism at the Center for Security Policy, has noted. Far from limiting their activity to opposing the Nazis, German communists (who had engaged in their own efforts to overthrow the government) also “denounc[ed] socialists as ‘social fascists’ more dangerous than the real ones.” Moreover, Antifa was called the “decisive weapon” in one of the communists’ battles with the Social Democrats, Germany’s oldest political party. The original Antifa was engaged in a death struggle for power, not against tyranny, a death struggle between communism and fascism that would burst forth into total war with the launch of Operation Barbarossa and culminate in the fall of Berlin in 1945.

Red Terror in Europe

Though the fall of Hitler and Benito Mussolini and their fascist regimes would leave communists without an incarnated fascist foil and Antifa without a direct successor, the construct of anti-fascist action was alive and well, and numerous organizations would follow in the violent communist footsteps of Antifaschistische Aktion. During the Cold War, the East German Communists would call the Berlin Wall the “Antifascistischer Schutzwall,” or “antifascist bulwark,” and the Soviet Union weaponized the term “fascist” not to delineate “a stable set of characteristics” but to label its “most prominent or hostile enemy in any given context.”

In Italy, the Red Brigade, launched in 1970, perpetrated “about 50 attacks, in which nearly 50 people were killed” from 1974 to 1988. With roots in the “1960s worker and student
protest movements,” the Red Brigade waged war against the “right-wing political bourgeoisie” to bring about a Marxist revolution. The group’s ideology was so obviously violent and left-wing that Red Brigadist Patrizio Peci noted that one did not join the Brigade “if one does not believe completely in Communism, if one does not believe in the armed struggle as the only way to bring it about, if one does not believe in victory.”

The Red Brigade would ultimately fail, but not before abducting and then assassinating former Prime Minister Aldo Moro in 1978 after holding him for nearly two months. In 1981, four Red Brigade terrorists who presented themselves as plumbers kidnapped NATO Deputy Chief of Staff General James Dozier, though Italian police rescued Dozier after more than 40 days in captivity. Red Brigade communists were known for “kneecapping” opponents they chose not to kill by putting a bullet through each knee, disabling the victims for life.

As the Brigade’s left-wing terror spree kicked off in Italy, the Red Army Faction (or Baader-Meinhof Group) was on the rise in West Germany. Originating in student protests and backed by the East German Stasi, the RAF targeted high-profile businessmen, politicians, and other public figures in its “anti-fascist” war on West German capitalism and U.S. “imperialism.” The RAF’s radical leftists bombed, shot, and kidnapped their way through the ’70s and ’80s before finally collapsing in 1998 — having killed at least 34 people, collaborated with Palestinian terrorists to hijack an airliner, and laid siege to the West German embassy.

The communist RAF did garner the attention of atheist philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, one of the most influential thinkers of the 20th century. After Sartre reportedly pontificated that the RAF was an “interesting force” that had “a sense for the Revolution,” the left-wing terrorist organization suggested Sartre should meet with the imprisoned Andreas Baader. The meeting was controversial at the time, but it would be nearly 40 years before the transcript was released. In that transcript, Sartre tried to alter Baader’s course, but he also rationalized the RAF’s violent actions, saying they “might be justified for Brazil, but not for Germany.” In Brazil, after all, there was a different type of “proletariat.”

Sartre’s attitude is unsurprising, given his radical moral relativism and his enthusiastic support for political violence. In the foreword to Frantz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth, Sartre infamously wrote that “this irrepressible violence … is man re-creating himself,” and “to shoot down a European is to kill two birds with one stone.” “Fanon’s view,” in the words of The New Yorker, was that “the Western bourgeoisie was ‘fundamentally racist’ and its ‘bourgeois ideology’ of equality and dignity was merely a cover for capitalist-imperialist rapacity” — apt summaries of the ideology that animates the modern left and the modern Antifa movement.

Weather Underground and the Rise of American Antifa

In the United States, today’s Antifa has numerous forerunners, among whom is the Weather Underground, which executed a number of the 2,500 bombings that were perpetrated in a year-and-a-half period in the early 1970s. Notably, Weather Underground members Kathy Boudin and David Gilbert are the parents of radical leftist prosecutor Chesa Boudin, and fellow Weather Undergrounders Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn raised the younger Boudin. (Ayers was also instrumental in Barack Obama’s entry into politics, and his adopted son Chesa Boudin was elected D.A. of San Francisco, where he was recalled for refusing to prosecute crime.) 

The May 19th Communist Organization (MCO) and its “front” group, John Brown Anti-Klan Committee, are another prominent example, engaging in or promoting street fighting, robberies, bombings, and pro-communist propaganda in the late ’70s and early ’80s.

Meanwhile, as Shideler describes,

In 1980s Germany, Antifa honed new tactics as it took part in clashes between police and student squatters. These squatters were devotees of autonomism, an anarcho-Marxist ideology influenced by the previous generation’s Communist guerillas. German Autonomen were the pioneers of the now-infamous “black bloc” street-fighting tactics, in which rebels would block off and then passionately defend their self-styled “autonomous zones.” Black bloc action remains the basis for Antifa’s modern campaigns, as exemplified in the notorious Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ) in downtown Seattle in the summer of [2020]. This strategy is what allowed Antifa to transfer effectively into the British cities, and from there to the United States.

In a 2020 RealClearInvestigations report, The Federalist’s Mark Hemingway observed that Antifa in the United States has “drawn power from punk-rock subcultures and post-1960s left-wing extremism.”

After white supremacists recruited disaffected youths as “skinheads” and racist “Oi” bands began to appear, counter-movements formed in response. In particular,  a group of punk rockers known as the Minnesota Baldies in 1987 formed the Anti-Racist Action Network (ARA) to engage in “direct action” confrontations using spray paint, crowbars, and bricks against racists in the punk scene. Word of the group and its exploits, which sometimes involved violent skirmishes with racists, spread via underground punk publications known as “zines” and the organization spread across the country.

According to a CNN report, “Large numbers of Antifa activists first appeared in the United States at anti-World Trade Organization protests in 1999 in Seattle, and then more recently during the Occupy Wall Street movement.” As Hemingway noted, the first group to take up the mantle “Antifa” surfaced in Boston in 2002, and in 2013, the Torch Antifa network formed, eventually becoming “one of the largest regional networks of Antifa in the United States.” By 2017, Antifa groups were reportedly showing up at pro-Trump rallies, the “Unite the Right” gathering in Charlottesville, and college campuses in protest of speakers they opposed, while being “involved in clashes across the country and the world, including in Chicago, Philadelphia, Houston, Alabama and Nebraska, and at the G20 summit in Hamburg, Germany” shortly after.

Identity-Obsessed Violence

Since bursting onto the national scene, Antifa members — to give just a few examples — have engaged in countless street “actions” that involve violence, intimidation, manipulation, scare tactics, and mistreatment of law enforcement, journalists, and demonstrators. Antifa has shut down events, vandalized homespolitical headquarters, and government buildings, taken to the streets with weapons, and destroyed property. In 2019, a “self-proclaimed” Antifa radical and John Brown Gun Club member assaulted an ICE facility with an AR-15 and tried to blow up a “500-gallon propane tank.” In 2020, a self-professed Antifa member allegedly shot an opposing protestor — and was wanted for murder before he himself was killed by law enforcement when he “attempted to escape arrest and produced a firearm,” according to then-Attorney General William Barr. In 2022, Antifa agitators in Portland allegedly disrupted a GOP candidate’s rally with smoke grenades, paint-filled balloons, and fireworks. Suspected Antifa members allegedly ambushed ICE officers in July of this year, shooting one police officer in the neck. Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin wrote antifascist messages on his ammunition.

Antifa’s use of political violence, force, and intimidation offers compelling proof that it is the ideological successor of Antifaschistische Aktion and its progeny, from the Red Army Faction to the Weather Underground. The willingness to engage in violence flows directly from the Marxist ideology Antifa holds in common with its predecessors. Karl Marx pitted the proletariat inevitably and intractably against the bourgeoisie and predicted that the “expropriators” would be “expropriated” — a prediction “hypnotic in its promise of apocalyptic revolutionary violence,” in the words of historian Sean McMeekin. The communists of the 20th century would make good on that promise — with casualty totals in the tens of millions — and Antifa threatens to do so again.

Modern Antifa remains as committed as its predecessors to painting its opponents as fascists and opposing capitalism, but its wheelhouse is found in exploiting the oppressor-oppressed matrix to victimize its enemies while simultaneously claiming victim status. This latter point explains Antifa’s obsession with identity, whether identity based on race as capitalized on in the Black Lives Matter riots of 2020, or the identity of illegal immigrants as those exploited by Western colonialism or climate change, or the identity of trans-identifying individuals as those supposedly wronged by the traditional family and Judeo-Christian ethics. Within the oppressor-oppressed matrix, white people, ICE (and American citizens more generally), and Christians — particularly those with some kind of political involvement — become the “fascists” at whom Antifa aims its direct actions in defense of people of color, immigrants, and those who identify as LGBT.

Predictably, the corporate media and Democrats are largely favorably disposed toward Antifa, and when confronted with evidence of Antifa members’ violent actions or the Trump administration’s designation of Antifa as a terrorist organization, they dismiss the movement as an idea, too ethereal to grasp or define. Antifa, the media would have Americans believe, “just means the opposition to fascism.” It’s more “a political scapegoat, honestly,” than a “genuine security threat.”

Aside from mere dismissiveness, media have downplayed the danger posed by Antifa (and left-wing political violence more generally) in two notable ways: First, they have constitently demonized ICE and immigration enforcement, thus presenting anti-ICE assaults as expected and justified; and second, they have painted Charlie Kirk as a itinerant con man and provacateur who deserved the hate leftists heaped on him, rather than as a man who was a conservative statesman, the founder of what is perhaps the right’s most important organization, and a potential presidential candidate.

If the Antifa movement is allowed to fester in American public life, however, an escalation of its violent tactics — assassination, assault, abduction, anarchy — in the pattern of the communist terror groups who have gone before it is not only possible but inevitable. If Antifa is to be defeated, its godless utilitarianism and Marxist identity-obsession that excuses in advance any and every action taken by the “oppressed” against the “oppressor” must be entirely rejected.