Wednesday, September 10, 2025

Freedom Revealed: Freedom Isn’t a Slogan -- It’s a System


Every politician in Washington loves to talk about “our freedoms.” They wave flags, sing songs, and quote the Founders when it suits them. But when the cameras are off, they’re usually busy voting for more spending, more rules, and more regulations that quietly erode the very liberty they claim to defend. That’s why a book like Freedom Revealed by Don Wilkie feels so bracing: it reminds us that freedom isn’t a mood or a metaphor. It’s a system. And if you don’t keep the system running properly, it breaks.

This isn’t airy theory. Freedom Revealed lays out freedom the way an engineer would describe a machine: parts, gears, inputs, and outputs. When they mesh, you get liberty and prosperity. When they grind against each other, you get waste, dependency, and eventually tyranny. It’s blunt, it’s logical, and it’s exactly the kind of framework our leaders in Washington ought to be working from.

One of the book’s central insights is the contrast between the marketplace and government. The marketplace is competitive. Companies have to win over customers or they go out of business. That competition drives down waste and improves service. Government, by contrast, has no competition. It can’t go bankrupt, it can’t be fired, and it rarely admits mistakes. So it grows, accumulates rules, and generates waste.

The point is simple but devastating: if you want prosperity, you need more marketplace and less government. Yet our current political class keeps flipping the equation -- letting bureaucracies expand while treating the private sector like a piggy bank. The result? Rising costs, stagnation, and a citizenry that feels more controlled than free.

Freedom Revealed drives home a truth most politicians seem to have forgotten: the American middle class wasn’t created by government handouts. It was born from limited government that allowed markets to function. Prosperity flows from competition, innovation, and the elimination of waste -- not from subsidies, entitlements, or central planning.

Read these chapters and you’ll start to see modern politics in a new light. Every trillion-dollar “stimulus,” every new alphabet-soup program, every “temporary” rule that never expires -- each one is another wrench thrown into the machinery of freedom. No wonder the middle class feels squeezed.

Another crucial section focuses on responsibility. In a free system, adulthood means independence. You earn your way, you pay your dues, and you don’t rely on someone else -- especially not the government -- for your sustenance. Dependence, no matter how kindly it’s dressed up, is the enemy of liberty.

This is a point today’s culture desperately needs to hear. We’ve built entire political platforms around encouraging dependency, treating it as compassion. But Freedom Revealed shows the hard truth: a dependent citizen is not a free citizen. A nation that fosters dependency is a nation slowly dismantling its own freedom.

The book also underscores the genius of the Constitution. It wasn’t written to empower government -- it was written to restrain it. Franklin and the other framers understood that government left unchecked always expands toward arbitrary power. The Constitution was the box meant to keep that power contained.

Read in today’s context, this point feels almost revolutionary. Washington now treats the Constitution like an inconvenience to be worked around, not a limit to be honored. Every executive order that stretches the law, every agency that piles on new rules without legislation, every judicial ruling that rewrites rather than interprets -- all of it erodes the box that keeps us free.

What makes Freedom Revealed so compelling is its refusal to get lost in jargon. It doesn’t obsess over polling data or partisan gossip. It strips freedom down to its working parts: limited government, competitive markets, and personal responsibility. These aren’t negotiable values. They’re the minimum requirements for liberty.

And here’s the sobering thought: if we lose those requirements, freedom doesn’t fade gently into the night. It collapses. The book points to places like Detroit -- once thriving, now hollowed out by regulation, corruption, and dependency -- as cautionary tales. Multiply Detroit’s fate by fifty states, and you see the trajectory America is on if we keep treating government as savior instead of servant.

Freedom Revealed is not a policy white paper, nor is it a partisan rant. It’s a user’s manual for liberty. It explains why freedom works, how it breaks, and what we need to do to keep it alive. For conservatives and constitutional originalists, it’s a vindication of what we’ve always believed: liberty is sustained by responsibility, prosperity is born of competition, and government must be restrained by design.

More importantly, it’s a challenge. It dares us to confront the waste, dependency, and arbitrary power that are choking our republic. It dares us to demand that our leaders think more like Franklin -- practical, disciplined, and wary of unchecked government -- than like the career politicians who have led us into trillion-dollar deficits and endless bureaucracy.

If freedom is a system, then America is overdue for a tune-up. And Freedom Revealed is exactly the kind of book that can remind us how to get back under the hood.



Podcast thread for Sept 10

 


As what tomorrow marks, I was born into a world on fire. Didn't always look that way growing up because people seemed to still have their heads on straight, and because yes, I was just a kid enjoying childhood.

Then months after I became an adult, everything was lit on fire again with a fake virus, and hasn't been the same since. Mental illness has just taken over.

I've navigated things the best I can through hobbies, today though, or heck, maybe the last month or so. I'm just tired of it all.

All I'm saying further on this without going into the whole 'does this all end when the left just gets rid of us all' stuff is this: Political violence is never okay, and it must never be normalized.

We need peace. We need justice. We need mental illness to be dealt with instead of tolerated.

That's all I'm saying.

Here's tonight's podcasts:



Charlie Kirk Assassinated During Appearance at Utah Valley University in Orem

Conservative pundit and leading voice of Turning Point USA Charlie Kirk was about 20 minutes into a presentation when he was shot. 

Post comments and updates in comments. 



A Tragedy Worse Than Epstein’s Island, But With Less Paperwork


Under Joe Biden, or whoever was running the country between 2021 and 2024, over 470,000 unaccompanied migrant children waltzed into the country.Many of these kids promptly vanished into a bureaucratic black hole. Since then, in a move both heroic and horrifyingly necessary, the Trump administration has located over 22,000 of these kids, arrested 400 traffickers, and uncovered the grim reality that 27 children met tragic ends through murder, overdose, or suicide. Yes, Epstein’s operation was a master class in depravity, but Biden’s border policies might just take the cake, and it’s a moldy, taxpayer-funded one at that.

While Epstein was sneaking around in the shadows, Biden’s team was running what amounts to a government-sanctioned child distribution network, handing kids over to “sponsors” with less vetting than you’d need to adopt a stray cat from the local shelter. No DNA tests, no criminal background checks, no proof these so-called sponsors weren’t running a drug den or a trafficking ring. Just a hearty “here ya go!” and a child was sent off into the abyss. The result? Children raped, enslaved in debt bondage, or left in homes where the “sponsor” was slinging drugs. One child even died of an overdose because, apparently, nobody thought to check if the sponsor’s day job involved needles. It’s almost like the Biden administration intentionally designed a system to lose kids.

Enter President Trump. He enlisted border czar Tom Homan, FBI agents and Homeland Security investigators to lead an elite squad. They've been digging through the Democrats' shoddy records and have located 22,638 kids, arrested 400 shady sponsors and uncovered countless horrors -- kids forced into sexual slavery, labor trafficking, or living in dystopic conditions. And have you heard about those 27 kids who didn't make it? No, of course not. It doesn't fit the narrative and it would make the Democrats look bad. While they were accusing Republicans of separating children from their parents, they were busy enabling a child-trafficking trade.

Every Democrat accusation is a confession.

Biden's team just didn't drop the ball, they punted it into another universe. They inherited a system that needed oversight and decided to double-down, and worse. Oh sure, they set up a hot-line where these kids could call in with concerns.

Guess how many operators they had? One.

Guess how many calls went unanswered? Over 65,000.

Those red flags were left to gather dust while kids were handed out to strangers like free samples at a supermarket. HHS advisor John Fabbricatore tendered a massive understatement when he said there was "not very good record-keeping." That's like calling the Titanic going down a "minor boating mishap." Incorrect computer records, no follow-ups, no accountability. If the Biden team wanted those kids to disappear it's hard to imagine a better way to do it. Compare that to Epstein, who at least kept his crimes private. Biden's disaster played out in plain sight, funded by our tax dollars with a side dish of political optics to make it all look like compassion. "Oh! Those poor kids are fleeing poverty and violence! They deserve a chance at a better life!" What they got was a choice slice of hell. What Joe Biden and his handlers did was facilitate a tragedy worse than Epstein’s island, but with less paperwork.

The comparison to Epstein isn't just spicy rhetoric; it's excruciatingly apt. Epstein ran a secret operation, while Biden's team built a public pipeline that delivered kids to predators on an industrial scale. Epstein's crimes were vile, but they were limited to his creepy island and a few mansions. Biden's policies turned the entire U.S. border into a child-trafficking superhighway.

Trump's team is now doing what should have been done from the very beginning: DNA tests to confirm family ties, criminal background checks, fingerprinting, and ensuring that sponsors can actually afford to care for a child without turning them into indentured servants. Yes, kids may have to stay in custody longer, but as Fabbricatore points out, "we want to ensure that these children remain safe." What an idea -- prioritizing safety over speed! They're even working to reunite kids with their actual parents back home when there's no credible fear claim, because evidently, it's better for a child to be with his family than in a U.S. foster care system, or worse, in the clutches of a child predator. Who woulda thunk it?

The Trump administration's efforts to find these children and hold predators accountable are a good start, but the damage has been done -- thousands of kids have suffered, and at least 27 are gone forever. Every parent, every sane person in America should be livid, demanding answers, and wondering how this was allowed to happen under a president and a political party that claimed to care about "the children." Guess what? It was never about care. It was always about optics, (like everything else the Left does) and the kids paid the price.

The Trump team's mission is a grim reminder that leadership matters. While the Biden administration was busy patting themselves on the back for "processing" kids, Trump's people are out there finding them, saving them, and locking up the monsters who exploited them.

It that's not a wake-up call to hold the Biden administration accountable, I don't know what is. This nightmare demands justice, and it starts at the top.



🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Bureau of Labor and Statistics Announces 911,000 Fewer Jobs Created April ’24 through March ’25


Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent noted, when you add the previous Biden revision of -577,000 to the current revision of -911,000 the Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS) had overreported Biden’s job growth by almost 1.5 million jobs.

The BLS reports today [SEE DATA HERE] an annual revision of 911,000 fewer jobs that previously reported.  These further puts President Trump’s decision to fire the head of the BLS into context.

[SOURCE]


Free Abortions And No Prisons: 6 Craziest Beliefs Of The Socialist Faction Infiltrating The Democrat Party


Democrats who embrace rotten DSA policies festering in their party are paving the way for a nation that would make our founders weep.



New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani and Minneapolis mayoral candidate Omar Fateh have more in common than campaigns to run major cities in the United States. Both are under 40 and elected members of their state houses. Zohran, 33, is a member of the New York State Assembly; Fateh, 35, is a Minnesota senator. Both are charismatic, Muslim, and are members of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), running on the Democrat ticket with radical, socialist ideas.

DSA is not a political party, but it is acting like one. It is a parasite taking over the Democrat party, which means it is becoming harder for traditional Democrat candidates to rise within the party. Every Democrat candidate should be scrutinized for policy ties to DSA, even if they don’t advertise the connection.

As the traditional, old Democrat Party is cannibalized by DSA members, voters should understand that the DSA aims to fundamentally change the United States. The DSA calls the Constitution “ossified.” Its socialist platform is so radical that the DSA essentially proposes trashing the Constitution completely, developing a “new political order,” and writing “founding documents of a new socialist democracy.” If allowed to flourish, DSA will render the U.S. society as we know it unrecognizable.

Here is a closer look at some of the DSA’s platform that rarely, if ever, come up during campaign speeches.

1. Ditch the Senate and Electoral College

DSA’s platform puts an emphasis on abolishing the Senate and the Electoral College, which would leave people in less populated states without effective representation. We know more densely populated areas lean Democrat. If popularity were the only measure, the east and west coasts and large cities in between, like Chicago, would likely win every election by simply out-voting the many small farming communities and sparsely populated counties that lean conservative and deserve a voice. The founders created the Senate and the Electoral College to preserve their voices.

2. Close the Prisons

DSA cloaks its intentions by using difficult-to-decipher language in its platform, such as, “We must constrain, diminish, and abolish the carceral forces of the state.” It is a fancy way to say DSA wants to get rid of police and prisons, which it views as “white supremacist institutions.” DSA calls for the “Freedom for all incarcerated people.” It wants to stop “police occupation of black and brown communities,” and it wants to remove firearms from law enforcement officers and security guards. The lawless DSA plan would “repeal local ordinances that criminalize” homelessness, squatting, and those “involved” in the sex and drug trades. But the platform also calls for “community-based response systems to transphobic and homophobic violence, especially violence targeting black trans women, that is entirely separated from the police and criminal law system,” the DSA platform reads. So, protection for this group, but no one else, apparently.

3. War on ‘Whiteness’

It would be difficult to be white under DSA policies, which demand a fight against “white supremacy” that goes beyond treating everyone equally. DSA wants payback for “racial oppression” in part through reparations and DEI policies, and also links “whiteness” to capitalism that must be “combat[ted].”

4. Less Work, More Money

Empowering workers in labor unions is a major part of the DSA platform. “The socialist movement and the labor movement will rise or fall together,” the platform reads. DSA, “demands,” a “four-day, 32-hour work week with no reduction” in pay; “universal childcare” and education for all, and a $15 minimum wage. It sounds like DSA wants you to work and let the government raise your children.  

5. Government Owned Everything

DSA calls for more regulations and nationalization or “social ownership,” of railroads, utilities, and “critical manufacturing and technology companies,” plus “regulation of corporate, communications, data, and financial sectors.” DSA wants a tighter federal grip on healthcare, banks, insurance, and real estate, and it would regulate food prices.

6. Free For All

With no discernible way to pay for it all, DSA envisions a world where the government meets your every “need,” at no cost. It advocates for free health care; free birth control; free abortions “on demand;” free “fertility treatment;” free chemical castration and sex surgeries to perpetuate the lie of “gender affirming care;” free communication with prisoners; free college (but less student testing in schools); free medical school; free water, energy, food, and public transit. And if you can’t make rent with all your other expenses paid, DSA wants to make it harder for landlords to evict renters from housing.  

Democrats who embrace rotten DSA policies festering in their party are paving the way for a nation that would make our founders weep. Some policies on the DSA wish-list got a toehold during former President Joe “Autopen” Biden’s administration, such as the DEI hirings and many environmental measures in the so-called “Inflation Reduction Act.” This shows that Democrat candidates don’t have to voice affiliation with DSA to adopt its socialist policies.

It is time for some Democrat soul-searching. Traditional Democrats should root out DSA members and return to a party JFK would recognize. Or openly admit that today’s brand of Democrat — one with a heavy dose of socialism that turns away from the reliable Constitution — is the new foundation of the entire party. 



Cracker Barrel’s Retreat Proves The Right Has Cultural Power If They’re Willing To Use It



Conservatives hold more cultural power than they may realize. The question is: Will they continue to use it?

Weeks after abandoning its plans to ax the infamous Uncle Herschel from its iconic logo, the southern restaurant chain Cracker Barrel announced Tuesday that it is not moving forward with the sterile redesign of its dining rooms nationwide.

“You’ve shared your voices in recent weeks not just on our logo, but also on our restaurants,” the company’s statement reads. “We’re continuing to listen. Today, we’re suspending our remodels. If your restaurant hasn’t been remodeled, you don’t need to worry, it won’t be.”

Cracker Barrel went on to acknowledge feedback from loyal customers that the “modern remodel design does not reflect what you love about Cracker Barrel.” The company said that while only four of its 660 locations had been tested with the redesign, it “won’t continue with it.”

As The Federalist’s Sean Davis and Hayden Daniel (and others) have pointed out, behind the backlash to the restaurant chain’s now-canceled redesign was about much more than mere dissatisfaction with the new logo and rebranding. The deeper issue was the company’s embrace of neo-Marxist ideologies and abandonment of the hallmark Americana vibe that’s defined it for generations.

But unlike some other past cultural flashpoints, the right refused to accept this situation lying down. Instead, they galvanized and directed their outcry in a targeted and coherent way that put the pressure on Cracker Barrel to cave. (The company has also reportedly scrubbed the DEI and LGBT “pride” sections from its website.)

[Tractor Supply’s DEI Reversal Shows The Power Of Citizen Activism

Contrary to popular belief among the woke scolds running corporate America’s HR departments, the radical gender and race politics being shoehorned into every facet of modern culture are not normal. Nor should Americans be forced to pretend that they are. 

These destructive ideologies are anti-American, reality-challenged propaganda, and conservatives shouldn’t be afraid to say so.

The key takeaway from all of this is that when everyday Americans speak as one voice against the insane, left-wing takeover of the country’s major institutions, they can win. With continued focus and dedication, they can ensure Cracker Barrel will be one of many dominoes to fall out of lockstep with the left’s identity-obsessed worldview.



E. Jean Carroll Admits to Using 'Tricks' to Convince Jury in Trump Case



E. Jean Carroll, the writer who accused President Donald Trump of sexual assault in a case dating back over three decades, has now openly admitted to using calculated theatrics to sway the jury — including a deliberate effort to make herself appear “f**kable” to strengthen her claim.

In a recent interview following her legal win in a federal appeals court, Carroll explained that she and her legal team crafted a visual strategy meant to influence jurors' perception. Her goal: to convince them she was attractive enough in the 1990s for a powerful man like Trump to pursue. To do so, she recreated her 1996 look with precision — same hairstyle, same clothes, and even brought in the same makeup artist who helped with her appearance on a talk show nearly 30 years ago.

“It was enough. It was a trick,” Carroll said. 

The case stems from Carroll’s claim that Trump assaulted her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room sometime in the mid-90s — an allegation she first made publicly in 2019. Trump has consistently denied even knowing Carroll, calling the accusation politically motivated and absurd. He has flatly stated, “This woman is not my type.”

Despite the absence of physical evidence, a jury found Trump liable for civil battery and defamation, awarding Carroll a staggering $83.3 million — most of it in punitive damages based on Trump’s public comments.

Trump’s legal team attempted to shield him using a Supreme Court ruling that presidents are immune from civil suits over official acts. But the courts ruled that his remarks about Carroll were not part of his official duties. His attorneys have vowed to take the case to the Supreme Court.

More disturbing than the verdict itself is Carroll’s cavalier admission that her courtroom image was a calculated ruse. She openly bragged about designing her appearance to manipulate the jury — not to present truth, but to stage a performance. This wasn’t justice served; it was theater.

And while Trump faces enormous penalties over defamation, the media’s own distortions have had consequences, too. ABC News recently paid Trump $15 million to settle after George Stephanopoulos falsely stated multiple times that Trump had been found “guilty of rape” — something no court has concluded.



MI Judge Dismisses Case Against 2020 Trump 'Fake Electors'; AG Hardest Hit


RedState 

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel is working hard to position herself for a gubernatorial run in 2026. However, with the failure of her efforts to sue the Trump administration for derailing the gender ideology train from which she rode into office, coupled with allegations of her slow-rolling a corruption probe for a ballot committee for which her wife is co-chair, the balloon of Nessel's aspirations for higher office is quickly deflating. Now, a 2020 election lawsuit she filed, which she thought would raise her profile, has instead blown up in her face. 

As RedState reported in 2023, Nessel made the move to reopen an investigation that Biden's U.S. Department of Justice chose to table: the Michigan Trump electors who banded together in an attempt to certify that then-President Donald J. Trump had won the 2020 election against former VP Joe Biden.

Nessel's choice to charge the supposed "fake electors" with multiple fraud counts was a head scratcher, and ultimately became her undoing. On Tuesday, a state judge dismissed the charges against all 15 Trump electors, citing a lack of evidence to prove their intent to defraud.

A Michigan state judge on Tuesday dismissed charges against the fake electors who signed certificates falsely claiming President Donald Trump won Michigan in the 2020 election, saying that the state failed to prove the 15 men and women were knowingly trying to break the law.

The group includes current and former state GOP officials, a Republican National Committee member, a mayor, a school board member and Trump supporters who were the plaintiffs in a frivolous lawsuit that tried to overturn the 2020 results. Each was facing eight charges.

“This is a fraud case, and we have to (prove) intent, and I don’t believe that there’s evidence sufficient to prove intent,” Judge Kristen Simmons said from the bench Tuesday in her Lansing courtroom.

The ruling ends the criminal prosecutions, which sought to punish state-level actors for ignoring the popular vote results, which went in favor of Joe Biden, and instead institute the will of political actors who supported Trump.

Despite ongoing cases surrounding fake electors in Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin, this is a clear signal that these efforts to punish Trump supporters who stood beside him in his struggle to prove malfeasance in 2020, and those who wanted to cement the narrative that 2020 was indeed a "free and fair" election, have been rendered null and void. With mounting evidence that then-candidate and former VP Joe Biden was never all there as far back as 2019, coupled with the erosion of the indictments that had been lodged against then-candidate and former President Trump, the pieces of what could well be considered an American color revolution continue to disintegrate.

The bigger proof: Trump won the 2024 election. Now that he is president again, he is making great strides in undoing the damage from the last four years. Part of this is working to ensure the most prominent actors who spearheaded the damage will be held accountable, while ensuring justice for those who were wrongly swept up in their persecution matrix. It will no doubt slip under the radar, but expect news of those other fake elector cases being dismissed or falling to the wayside.

State Rep. Matt Maddock, whose wife was one of the electors under indictment, now says he plans to sue Nessel, adding more weight to her legal and political woes.

WATCH:

Michigan GOP chairman Jim Runestad issued a statement celebrating the dismissal and sounding off about Nessel's politicization of the AG's office.

Today, Judge Kristen Simmons restored the public's faith in our justice system. All 2020 Trump Electors have officially been vindicated.

Nessel's use of the Attorney General's office to ruin and destroy the lives and reputations of 15 innocent Michigan Republicans is the perfect example of "lawfare." Attorney General Dana Nessel's political attack against 2020 alternate Trump electors was slapped down in court. This is not only a huge win for these electors but also for justice itself.

From the beginning, this was a blatant abuse of power. Nessel weaponized the legal system to financially, emotionally, and personally break her political opponents. Her endless harassment campaigns have wasted taxpayer dollars and undermined confidence in the rule of law. This travesty of justice never should have happened.

A great victory for the rule of law. Congratulations to these 15 innocent Michiganders who stood strong. 

Should this type of defeat and exposure of her corrupted actions continue, Nessel can probably kiss her gubernatorial hopes — or any future in politics — goodbye. 



♦️𝐖³π πƒπšπ’π₯𝐲 𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 π“π‘π«πžπšπ

 


W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Welcome to the W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Post whatever you got in the comments section below.

This feature will post every day at 6:30am Mountain time. 

 

Mired Down in War: Should Ukraine Surrender?


The Russo-Ukrainian War shows no signs of winding down. Since the Alaska Summit and the follow-on confab of European and American leadership in Washington, Tsar Vladimir I has dashed all hope of a cease-fire by stepping up attacks, including the largest air attack to date, involving ballistic and cruise missiles as well as hundreds of drones.

Ukraine, under President Zelensky, appears to be willing to fight on. That's causing some to ask, "For how long? To what end?" There's one thing most geopolitical and military analysts seem to (reluctantly, in some cases) agree on: Ukraine can't win a war with Russia. The best that Ukraine may be able to hope for is a negotiated peace without having to give up too much land. Until recently, I would have said the best they could hope for is a return to the status quo ante 2022, in which Russia keeps Crimea and Ukraine keeps the Donbas and other territories now under Russian boots. 

Now, even that seems unlikely.  That's leading some to ask if it wouldn't be better for Ukraine to admit defeat, to make what deal they can. 

I'm not so sure.

History, we are told, is written by the victors. Yet in Ukraine, the story may end up being written by those clever enough to redefine what ‘victory’ looks like.

Two tribes have been shouting across Western commentary trenches since 2022. On one side sit the realists, like John Mearsheimer, shrugging that Russia was provoked and that Ukraine must accept the grim realpolitik of geography. On the other side perch the idealists, like Matthew Syed, wagging fingers that anything short of total victory is appeasement.

We'll deal with the idealists another time. Besides, no matter what the idealists may think, Ukraine can't win "total victory" over Russia. Not alone. No matter how many weapons and munitions Europe supplies, it simply doesn't have the manpower.

But surrender?

Let’s be blunt. Defeating Russia outright is fantasy. Ukraine has fought valiantly, but Western support is flagging. European unity is a mirage. Germany still buys Russian gas under the table; since the war began, Europe has sent over $250  billion to Moscow for oil and gas. That’s not strategy. It’s self‑harm and hypocrisy masquerading as policy.

Ukraine's problem is simple: They're running out of young men. There was a saying in the American Civil War, during which wealthy men could pay for an exemption to the draft, to note that it was an "old man's war but a young man's fight." It is that cohort, young men, usually from 17 to 30 years of age, who are on the sharp end of the stick. T'was ever thus, and always will be. Why? Because they're young enough to stand it. I spent some time in infantry outfits for a while when I was in that age range, but if you asked me to engage in activity I took for granted back then, now, that I'm in my mid-sixties, well, I'd have a hell of a time keeping up.

All the weapons, all the vehicles, all the logistics, all the support in the world isn't worth a hill of beans if you run out of young men to fire the weapons, drive the vehicles, bring the logistics forward, and so on.

The rest of Europe, also, isn't going to keep those weapons coming forever.

Even NATO only began digging into defence budgets once Trump, uncouth and ill‑mannered but in this case both ethically and pragmatically correct, bullied Europe into paying its dues. The alliance has been shamed into adulthood by the political equivalent of a Casino Don.

I'm not at all certain that President Trump wouldn't accept that characterization as a kind of back-handed flattery. But that's as may be. Yes, President Trump shamed Europe into stepping up, and NATO's Secretary General has lauded him for it. But weapons and munitions stocks aren't a cornucopia. And speaking of those young men that are being called on to wield these weapons, their family members appear to be getting tired of the whole thing.

Meanwhile, Ukraine’s spirit is fraying. A Gallup poll in July 2025 found that just 24% still support fighting until victory, while 69% now favour a negotiated peace. That marks a near‑complete reversal from 2022, when 73% backed victory and just 22% desired talks. Zelensky’s approval, once north of 80%, now hovers around the mid‑60s. Not desperate, but no longer heroic.

But surrender? Author Clive Pinder writes of a possible dramatic turnabout for post-war Ukraine:

Imagine a Marshall Plan 2.0, funded by frozen Russian assets, redirected European subsidies and reform‑tied loans. Instead of smouldering weaponry, NATO should funnel that money into digital infrastructure, schools, start-ups.

Enter Estonia on steroids. Estonia’s GDP per capita leapt from $3,435 in 1991 to about $32,460 by 2023. Today, GDP per capita is around $31,855. Its economy is high‑income, advanced and resilient. Its ICT sector contributes over 7% of GDP, attracting €1.3 billion in tech investments in 2022. In digital public services, Estonia leads the EU. 89% of citizens use e‑government. Over half the electorate now votes online and it all works so smoothly it makes our elections look like they’re run by blokes with clipboards and carrier pigeons

Ukraine, brimming with tech‑savvy youth, fertile fields and room to grow, could scale this model 10-fold. Build a liberal, high‑growth democracy whose skyscrapers, start-ups and liberties shine across the border shouting ‘This is what you could have had, had you not been stuck with kleptocracy and fear’.

That’s the existential threat Putin fears. What keeps him awake isn’t NATO armour. It’s an Estonia where work, healthcare, banking and elections run on apps while Russia still runs on bribes and babushkas.

And that's where I think the whole argument comes apart.

First, the Marshall Plan was conceived and carried out in no small part to restore Europe as a major economic consumer of American goods; we had a vested interest in that. But Ukraine alone won't be a major consumer base. 

Second, it's not as though Ukraine, the United States, NATO, the European Commission, or anyone else can just look around for frozen Russian assets and say, "Oh, look, let's take those, and give them to Ukraine." There are legal issues around such a seizure that may take years to unwind. And is NATO just going to pour money into a nation that was once derided as having one of the most corrupt governments, the most corrupt economies in Europe? Have we forgotten Burisma already?

Third, even if all this works, even if Ukraine becomes, somehow, the Eastern European version of Silicon Valley - unlikely in the extreme - Tsar Vladimir I is just as likely to attempt to seize a richer Ukraine as to seek to emulate it.

In other words, while this thing can't go on forever, and while I would argue it really can't go on for much longer, surrender isn't the best option. Russia, while they have many more young men and a lot of equipment, can't carry this on forever. The stepped-up attacks by Russia on Ukraine may be some sign that Putin is getting some hot flashes, that powers in Russia, in Moscow, are pushing him to wrap this thing up. 

The likely end is becoming apparent. Ukraine will never get Crimea back. They are likely going to have to surrender some, if not all, of Donbas. In return, they get peace - for a while. It's a peace they should spend preparing for the next Russian attack, because it's much more likely to be a reprieve than a permanent condition, at least until Tsar Vladimir I shuffles off the mortal coil.