Sunday, September 7, 2025

The Power of ‘Thoughts and Prayers’


Tyrannical regimes hate Christianity and the faithful who pray.  Secular autocrats loathe prayer because it acknowledges a Being greater than any human authority.  Since despots believe themselves to be autonomous and their power unlimited, any rival to their sovereignty becomes a target.

Scarcely anyone expressed contempt for the spiritual discipline of prayer more forcefully than Joseph Stalin, the former dictator of the Soviet Union.  As the N.Y. Times reported in 1957, “it is related that Stalin, when advised of the Vatican’s attitude on European problems, inquired with a sneer, ‘And how many divisions does the pope have?’”

Author C. L. Sulzberger went on to add that such skepticism about the spiritual power of Christianity was nothing new.  In the thirteenth century, the pope sent a delegation to Baichu, viceroy over Asia Minor, which was ruled by the Mongol Khans.  The pope’s emissary, the Dominican Father Ezzelino, announced to the Mongols,  “I am the legate of the pope, who is placed high above all the kings and princes of the world and who is honored by them as their lord and father.”

The Mongols laughed, asking Father Ezzelino how many territories the pope had conquered?  “How many peoples had he subdued?  Was his name dreaded between the eastern and western oceans like that of the great Genghis?”

Modern secular pundits and officials continue to sneer at the prayers of the faithful.

In the wake of the murder of the innocents at the Church of the Annunciation in Minneapolis, Minnesota, media types such as Jen Psaki and politicians such as Gavin Newsom have displayed open contempt for the prayers offered on behalf of the dead, the wounded. and their families.  They have declared that prayers are pointless and that action such as increased gun control would be a better response.

The current anti-prayer mantra is in line with the contempt displayed by the left for centuries, particularly since the so-called Enlightenment and the French Revolution.  The long line of cynics, be they eighteenth-century deist Voltaire or twentieth-century atheist philosophers Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir, includes Madelyn Murray O’Hair, who succeeded in eliminating prayer in public schools.

O’Hair’s and other activists’ campaigns against prayer and display of the Ten Commandments, combined with the attempted erasure of Christianity’s influence in the West, have produced a wasteland of secularist neo-Marxist ideology characterized by utter confusion, rootlessness, and ceaseless violence.  As Dorothy Sayers, writing in 1955 only ten years after WWII and the exposure of the Holocaust, noted in the introduction to her translation of Dante’s Purgatorio, “We are now aware, as formerly we were not, of the situation which results when secular power is emancipated from all religious sanctions.”

As Hebrew writers record in the Second Book of Kings, a disdainful Assyrian commander challenged the prayerful and God-fearing Jews of Jerusalem.  He declared that his troops would lay siege to the city, and that it would not be long before the inhabitants ate their own excrement and drank their own urine.  He reminded them of all the cities and territories that had surrendered to the might of Sennacherib’s armies.  But King Hezekiah, who at first futilely had tried appeasement, prayed.  His prayers were answered.  God sent an angel of death, and 185,000 Assyrian soldiers perished.  It turned out that the hosts of Jehovah had more divisions than the Assyrian armies.

Secularists dismiss such ancient records as myths.  It is not a surprise that when in modern times sudden collapses of tyrannical regimes occur, secularists dismiss supernatural intervention.  Nonetheless, the twentieth century has seen the overnight collapse of atheistic communist regimes in response to the outcries of the prayerful devout and the unbending faith of Christian leaders.  Pope John Paul II and union leader Lech Walesa, backed by the prayerful support of millions of Christians, rescued Poland from the grip of communism.

Shortly after the fall of the Soviet-backed regime in Poland, the Soviet Union collapsed.  In the years that followed, the Russian Orthodox Church, which had suffered unimaginable persecution under Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, and party apparatchiks, miraculously revived.  Seventy-one percent of Russia’s population is now Orthodox.

Author Fyodor Dostoevsky saw the rise of anarchism in tsarist Russia.  His novel Demons (also translated as The Possessed) outlined the devilish rationale behind the ideology.  He further outlined the attacks on the pillars of Russian society in his novel The Brothers Karamazov.  Father Zosima, a priest, has a conversation in which he rejects the premises of atheist Ivan Karamazov by putting forth the monastic ideals and practices of prayer and thoughtful meditation:

Fathers and teachers, what is the monk? In the cultivated world the word is nowadays pronounced by some people with a jeer, and by others it is used as a term of abuse, and this contempt for the monk is growing.

It is true, alas, it is true, that there are many sluggards, gluttons, profligates, and insolent beggars among monks. Educated people point to these: “You are idlers, useless members of society, you live on the labor of others, you are shameless beggars.”

And yet how many meek and humble monks there are, yearning for solitude and fervent prayer in peace! These are less noticed, or passed over in silence. And how surprised men would be if I were to say that from these meek monks, who yearn for solitary prayer, the salvation of Russia will come perhaps once more! For they are in truth made ready in peace and quiet “for the day and the hour, the month and the year.”

Father Zosima noted that the scientific elite of the day despised Christianity:

The spiritual world, the higher part of man’s being is rejected altogether, dismissed with a sort of triumph, even with hatred. The world has proclaimed the reign of freedom, especially of late, but what do we see in this freedom of theirs? Nothing but slavery and self-destruction! ... The monastic way is very different. Obedience, fasting, and prayer are laughed at, yet only through them lies the way to real, true freedom.

In the West, the freakishness and outright insanity characterizing the left have come to the forefront and still appear to dominate the culture.  Tragically, some Christian churches have absorbed the left’s contempt for prayer and other spiritual disciplines, preferring the activism promoted by the left.

Perhaps the murder and wounding of innocent children at prayer will inspire a return to the Christian discipline of prayer, not a rejection of it.  Perhaps an acknowledgment of and prayers against the evil forces behind the killings will cause the nation and the world to realize the Christian ideals promoted by the fictitious Father Zosima and practiced every day by countless millions of real Christians are indicators of sanity, not pointless and ineffective rituals.

Prayerful acknowledgment of our utter dependence on the grace and mercy of our creator God would be a good beginning to a spiritual revival, the power of which could change the nation and the entire world order.

Prayers has changed entire power structures in the past.  It can and will continue to effect changes in the present and future.



Entertainment and politics thread for Sept 7

 

Hey ho, it's another week.

It’s Democrats Or America, It Can’t Be Both


The word “genocide” is tossed around by Democrats very casually these days, where everything from their terrorist friends losing a war they started to white people eat Chinese food. Of course, nothing these grievance studies major-leftists call genocide is actually genocide – “the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group” – but drama queens are gonna drama queen.

However, since these “progressives” love to use the word, let’s use it to describe something that is closer to cultural genocide than anything they whine about: the lack of assimilation they insist is “celebrating diversity!”

Without a common culture, and more importantly a common language, no society can last long. Assimilation is the only way to achieve the cohesion any society needs to not only thrive, but survive. If you have nothing in common with large swaths of a population – things like food, movies, sports and all other normal “likes” people have – and you cannot even communicate with them, they will never be your countrymen and you will never be theirs. How could you be?

Division is cancer to a society. It also happens to be the medium in which Democrats thrive the most, as they pit one group against another and masquerade as the “protectors” of one of the groups in a conflict they created. They divide to conquer.

So, when Dearborn Heights puts a patch for police officers written in Arabic, what is that meant to advance? Not understanding, not community, not American values, no. It is meant to keep people who already have very little in common from being able to communicate and separate them further to prevent them from trying.

I lived in Dearborn, Michigan, which is next to Dearborn Heights, and was the Arabic-dominant city in the country when I was there in college in the late 90s through 2001. West Dearborn was not Arabic, the eastern half of the city was. Almost 25 years later, the whole city is covered in signs for stores in Arabic and English isn’t always a language spoken.

It’s not just Dearborn, much of Dearborn Heights is like visiting a foreign country, and not a good one. Hamtramck went from a Polish enclave in Detroit to another mini-Lebanon, with the city council now dominated by third world politics. Import the third world, become the third world.

This is happening from coast to coast, growing areas of “immigrant communities” where the people are not becoming Americans, they are recreating the countries and cultures they fled at the encouragement and insistence of Democrats.

Is that something worth celebrating? It is if you hate women and gay people, two groups of people Democrats claim domain over the protection of who are not in favor with much of the third world. You never wanted to be a young girl or a gay man on the street of any city in the Middle East or large swaths of Africa or Asia, aside from Israel, and now you don’t want to be one in any Dearborn, parts of Maine, chunks of Minneapolis and many other places.

Many places in the United States of America not only do not feel like part of the United States, they feel like you need a passport and an interpreter to visit. So Americans don’t.

That’s the point. Democrats need people divided and unable to communicate. Makes them easier to manipulate.

Kilmar “the Maryland Man” Abrego Garcia has lived in the country illegally for more than a decade and can’t speak English well enough to not require an interpreter when he issues a statement. “He came here for a better life” is always what these leftists say, but how good of a life can anyone have when they can’t speak to anyone?

Democrats don’t care that their gardeners will never be able to talk to anyone who isn’t from the pit they escaped from, they only care that they don’t have to pay a lot to get their grass cut. I don’t care that they get their grass cut, I don’t want illegal aliens in the country. And increasingly, as Democrats recreate in this country the hell-holes legal immigrants fled, I believe we have to put a stop to all immigration for anyone who can’t already speak English.

Immigrants can’t help but be a drain on the country if they are not only illiterate in their native language, but unable to communicate in ours. Our public schools are churning out a big enough supply of illiterate in English “graduates” already, we don’t need to import more. And if we make welfare more limited toward people who can’t work, not those who won’t, the luxury of “jobs Americans won’t do” will go away.

Meanwhile, the legal immigrants already here will be given time to assimilate. Learn the language, accept the cultural norms, or get out.

The great immigration push in the late 19th and early 20th centuries are portrayed as a free- for-all where everyone was welcome because they were white Europeans. Like everything else about Democrats, this is a lie. Ellis Island was not a welcome station, it was a screening station. If you were sick, you were turned away. Missing teeth? Bye. Didn’t have the means to take care of yourself or someone willing to take responsibility for you if you can’t? Back on the boat.

If you did not meet the criteria to be a benefit to the United States you were not allowed into the United States, as it should be. It didn’t matter you “wanted a better life,” the question was what do we get out of letting you in? If it was nothing, or even not enough, you weren’t getting in.

And once you got here, you’d better set your ass on the path to becoming “American.” That meant learning the language and the culture. Chinatown, Little Italy and all the other ethnic enclaves existed not as a landing strip for new immigrants, but as a launching pad. New arrivals lived there because they could communicate and work there, but the goal was to be there only as long as they had to. They worked their asses off the learn the language and how to be an American, then they got the hell out to the rest of the country. They kept parts of their old culture – the food, some of the traditions – but they were not slaves or prisoners to it like Democrats want immigrants to be today.

“Assimilation is cultural genocide” they say. What it really is has always been the pathway to success and independence in America, the very things that cause people to run away from the Democratic Party. So, what’s a little damage to the country and creating a permanent underclass of cheap labor and disposable people if it helps Democrats politically? Paying slaves a small wage doesn’t make them not slaves, it just makes you a progressive Democrat.

What Democrats are doing may benefit them in the short-term, but it hurts the country. They don’t care, they want to hurt the country because that, too, benefits them and is the crux of most of their agenda items. But for real Americans, and for the sake of the country, they need to be stopped. You shouldn’t feel like you need a passport or a security detail and an interpreter to visit anywhere in the United States. It’s not out of control yet, but it’s not that far off.

The choice is clear: Destroy Democrats before they Destroy America. 



Who Defends Democracy?

When Democrats scream that Trump is Hitler, they miss that he has been the best defender of democracy in a good long time.


For a long time now, Democrats have claimed that they are “defending democracy.”  Most recently, Barack Obama appeared at the Democratic National Committee summer meeting and ended his spiel with a plea to his audience to “defend democracy.”  Against what, he neglected to say, but the implication was that his political opponents are a threat to democracy.

Often progressives are more specific.  They think Donald Trump has studied Hitler’s speeches and that he is following Hitler’s playbook.  They see Trump as a dictator who is using ICE and other federal agencies to “take over” our democracy.  They think bringing in the National Guard to protect citizens against gang violence is a step toward dictatorship.

Like all such claims, it comes with no proof.  How exactly are Republicans threatening democracy when they prevent crime or when they deport illegals who have committed violent crimes?

The problem with the Democrat strategy is that it is inherently irresponsible and extremist.  As Eli Hassell wrote in the Times of Israel, “comparing Trump to Hitler is ‘cheapening’ the Holocaust.”  He continued: “Words cannot describe the soul-crushing harrowing atrocity that [Hitler] caused.  After leading the Nazi party into governance, he committed a genocide against the Jewish people, killing every Jewish person he could find.”  Hassell specifically criticized Kamala Harris for comparing Trump to Hitler, but the same could be said for nearly every Democrat leader.  As Hassell points out, it is a “desecration.”  Do they really think Trump has committed evil on a scale equal to the Holocaust?

To suggest that one party is “defending democracy” while another is a “threat” to democracy, often with allusions to Nazis, dictators, storm troopers, and the like, is not just untrue; it is dangerous and irresponsible.  It raises the political temperature to the point where some may feel that violence is necessary to “defend” democracy, as was the case with two attempts on Trump’s life and a series of mass attacks by anti-Trump ideologues.  Is it wise for liberals to incite this kind of violence?

The reality is that neither Republicans nor Democrats, in a normal state of affairs, are a “threat to democracy.”  The two parties have existed for nearly two centuries, and, though there have been abuses, like FDR trying to stack the Supreme Court or Nixon approving the Watergate break-in, neither has attempted to “end” democracy.

In the case of President Trump, he was elected twice (perhaps three times) in fair elections, and he has governed in a constitutional manner.  Nearly every time his actions have been challenged in the courts, the Supreme Court has sided with Trump.  In other words, the constitutionality of Trump’s presidencies has been tested, and he has been found to be acting fairly — and democratically.

Russia-gate is where the Democrats crossed the line and actually threatened democracy with a serious attempt to subvert an election and undermine a president’s ability to govern.  Notice that even with perhaps the worst abuse in our nation’s political history, conservatives were not calling Democrats “Nazis.”  I can’t recall any Republican who referred to Biden as “Hitler.”  It is only progressives who have been using this dangerous rhetoric.

One irony is that the Democratic National Committee summer 2025 meeting, at which Obama claimed to be defending democracy, was held in Minnesota at precisely the time of Robin Westman’s attack on a group of Catholic schoolchildren who were praying, and at the time when numerous Democrats, including Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey and former Biden press secretary Jen Psaki, assailed those who said their “thoughts and prayers” were pointless and offensive.

The “thoughts and prayers” debacle is another example of progressive rhetoric gone haywire, and the underlying cause is a disconnect from reality: To dismiss and disparage Christians for their thoughts and prayers for the victims of the Minneapolis shootings demonstrates just how far progressives are from the values of ordinary Americans.  Worse yet, it suggests that progressives and the Democrat party as a whole are slipping into a sort of madness — a fantasy-land in which only they are virtuous and their opponents are evil.

It also shows that progressives do not understand that words actually matter.  To suggest, as many Democrats have, that prayers are pointless reveals a blatant misunderstanding of the nature of prayer and of religious faith in general.  It’s not at all different from comparing Trump to Hitler or saying he is a threat to democracy.  It’s not just a misuse of language, but a derangement of thinking.  Progressives really do think that it is wrong to pray; they do think Trump is Hitler; they do think conservatives want to destroy democracy.  They have moved past reality into a kind of madness, and that is dangerous. 

The truth is that Donald Trump is strengthening our democracy in a host of ways — by securing our borders, deporting criminals, safeguarding Americans in their cities, cutting federal spending, restoring fair and equal tariffs, and imposing safeguards at the ballot box.  The very one who has been accused of threatening democracy is the one who has been democracy’s greatest defender.

Only a minority of voters actually believe that Republicans are a threat to democracy.  The majority is moving toward Trump and the Republicans, as can be seen in Trump’s rising approval ratings and in increasing GOP voter registrations.  Even in terms of narrow political self-interest, it is foolish for progressives to continue their irresponsible attacks, but progressives can’t seem to help themselves.  They like the idea that conservatives are “destroying democracy,” and they’re going to continue making the false claim right up to and beyond the 2026 and 2028 elections.  That’s not good for the country, but it will probably help Republicans at the polls.



🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Trump Might Send Troops to Portland Next



President Donald Trump on Friday said that he might send troops to Portland next in his crime crack down. 

Trump was likely responding to a Fox News report that protesters placed a guillotine in front of the U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement field office in Portland, Oregon, earlier this week.

“Portland, it’s unbelievable what’s going on in Portland. The destruction of the city. I’m going to look at it now,” Trump said in a Friday new conference.

Trump has talked about sending troops to Chicago, Portland, Baltimore, and New Orleans - all Democrat-run cities in which he says that crime is out of control. 

All but Baltimore are sanctuary cities, meaning that they won’t partner with immigration officers who deport illegal aliens unless those people are wanted on a criminal warrant by local or federal authorities, if they have been convicted of a serious crime and remain in the United States illegally, or if they are a clear threat to public safety or national security.

Last month, the Department of Justice released a list of sanctuary states, cities, and counties. 

Oregon Attorney General Rayfield will sue the federal government if it sends troops into Oregon, he said in a statement. 

“If the president tries to send troops into Oregon to police our communities, we will not hesitate to take action in court. Although some threats from the Trump administration may be new or surprising, this one is not: we’ve been preparing to respond since Trump returned to office. We’re actively preparing for various scenarios, in coordination with key partners in Oregon, and our multistate AG coalition. California showed how effective our approach can be to stop federal overreach. Oregon is a safe place, and we intend to keep it that way. The president may have a lot of power, but he has to stay in his lane—and if he doesn’t, we’ll hold him accountable.”

The president has secured Washington D.C. using troops after a wave of violent crime. 

In June, 21-year-old congressional intern Eric Tarpinian-Jachym was gunned down less than a mile from the White House. The alleged shooters fired a total of 79 rounds, hitting the intern four times and injuring a woman and a 16-year-old boy.

Today, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro announced the arrest and charging of two 17-year-olds as adults. 

The crime crack down continues, according to Attorney General Pam Bondi. 

“Last night, 75 arrests were made and 11 illegal guns were taken off the streets of our nation’s capital. Make DC Safe Again! ”

Trump applauded the military for securing the city.

"We have virtually no crime. It's gone from the most unsafe city in the United States, almost, to to one of the safest cities, maybe the safest city in the United States. That's a tremendous complement to our military."



Chicago To See 'Department of War'


Townhall 

President Donald Trump seems poised to send troops to Chicago, according to a post on Truth Social. 

“I love the smell of deportations in the morning… Chicago is about to find out why it’s called the Department of War.”


Trump has roasted Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker for rampant crime in Chicago last weekend. 

“Six people were killed, and 24 people were shot, in Chicago last weekend, and JB Pritzker, the weak and pathetic Governor of Illinois, just said that he doesn’t need help in preventing CRIME. He is CRAZY!!! He better straighten it out, FAST, or we’re coming! MAGA. President DJT” 


  • For 13 consecutive years, Chicago has had the most murders of any US city.
  • Last year, Chicago’s murder rate per capita was three times higher than Los Angeles and nearly five times higher than New York City. 
  • Out of Chicago’s 147,899 reported crimes this tear, there have only been arrests in 16% of them. 
  • There have been more illegal guns recovered in Chicago than in New York City and Los Angeles combined
  • The number of reported motor vehicle thefts last year was more than double the number in 2021. 

Chicago is a sanctuary city, meaning that it won’t partner with immigration officers who deport illegal aliens unless those people are wanted on a criminal warrant by local or federal authorities, if they have been convicted of a serious crime and remain in the United States illegally, or if they are a clear threat to public safety or national security.

Trump has talked about sending troops to Chicago, Portland, Baltimore, and New Orleans - all Democrat-run cities in which he says that crime is out of control. Trump sent troops to Washington D.C. that will likely stay there through December. 

“This name change is not just about renaming, it’s about restoring… America First, peace through strength brought to you by the WAR DEPARTMENT.” - 

Pritzker posted a reaction to Trump's post.

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson signed an executive order. It aims for the city to not comply with immigration customs officials who are deporting illegal aliens. 

Last month, the Department of Justice released a list of sanctuary states, cities, and counties. 



Ukrainian Refugee Slain in Cold Blood on Public Transit



A woman fled war-torn Ukraine to Charlotte, North Carolina before she was fatally stabbed in the throat on public transportation on Aug. 22. 

Video released by the Charlotte Area Transit System shows 23-year-old Iryna Zarutska enter a train car wearing a black Zepeddie's Pizzeria shirt and hat. She had earphones in while she sat in front of Decarlos Brown Jr., 34 on the Blue Line, using her phone. 

Minutes later around 9:50 p.m., Brown allegedly stabbed Zarutska three times with a pocket knife, at least once in the throat before walking away. He was later arrested and charged with first-degree murder, officials said. 

She ran from war in Ukraine. She came here for safety.

And America FAILED her.


23-year-old Iryna Zarutska was butchered on a Charlotte light rail, her throat cut open by a violent repeat offender who had been arrested 14 times and was STILL free.

This wasn’t random. This was preventable. There is a war on White people. Her blood is on the hands of a system that lets violent criminals roam while innocent people pay the price.

If Iryna were Black and her killer White, the media would be rioting nonstop. But because she’s White, they stay silent.

This is evil. And it’s deliberate.

The stabbing was senseless, Charlotte Mayor Vi Lyles said in a social media post. 

"The video of the heartbreaking attack that took Iryna Zarutska’s life is now public. I want to thank our media partners and community members who have chosen not to repost or share the footage out of respect for Iryna’s family.

This was a senseless and tragic loss. My prayers remain with her loved ones as they continue to grieve through an unimaginable time.

Like so many of you, I’m heartbroken — and I’ve been thinking hard about what safety really looks like in our city. I remain committed to doing all we can to protect our residents and ensure Charlotte is a place where everyone feels safe."

Brown stabbed Zarutska despite someone sitting immediately to his right. Law enforcement declared Zarutska dead on the train. 

The fatal stabbing follows President Donald Trump sending troops to secure Washington D.C.

Trump has talked about sending troops to Chicago, Portland, Baltimore, and New Orleans - all Democrat-run cities in which he says that crime is out of control. 

Chicago leads the nation in the most murders nationwide for 13 years. 

Earlier today, Trump posting on Truth Social that troops might head toward Chicago. 



President Putin Notes an Underlying Issue Within Ukraine that Impedes Negotiation


I have often said that Russian dialogue is essentially different from Western dialogue in that Russian speaking is direct and without pretense. This difference is very visible when outlining positions built on pragmatic acceptances.

Recently, Russian President Vladimir Putin was asked about the status of negotiations with Ukraine. President Putin notes some of the internal political issues within Ukraine must be deconflicted in order for discussions to proceed. Without these issues resolved, discussion is futile.

Russian President Vladimir Putin: “First. After all, quite recently, the leadership of the Kyiv regime, mildly speaking unflatteringly of us, and excluded all possibility of direct Contacts. Now we see that they are asking for these contacts, at least Offer.

I have repeatedly said that I am ready for these contacts. At the news conference in Beijing, which you mentioned, I said that there is no point in I don’t see much of it. Why? Because it will be agreed with the Ukrainian side is almost impossible on key issues.

Even if there is a political will, What I doubt is that there are legal and technical difficulties that are that any agreements on territories must be confirmed in accordance with the Constitution of Ukraine at a referendumIn order to hold a referendum, martial law must be lifted, Martial law is not carried out. If martial law is lifted, it is necessary to immediately hold presidential elections.

After the referendum, if it is held, regardless of the results, it is necessary to obtain a decision of the Constitutional Court. And the constitutional court does not work, because after requests, as I understand it, to the Constitutional Court about the legitimacy of the current government, the court evaded these decisions, and the head of the regime He simply ordered the guards not to let the chairman of the Constitutional Court into the working place.

This is the kind of democracy there. And the chairman of the Supreme Court is just sitting in prison on corruption charges. It is well known that Ukraine has enough of this Corruption. But why was it necessary to send the chairman of the supreme court to prison to plant, it is not very clear. Although it is clear that it came to destruction their judicial system as such. This is another of the striking signs of “democracy” current Ukrainian authorities.

Therefore, this endless process is going nowhere. Nevertheless, we said that we are ready for a summit meeting.

Listen, the Ukrainian side wants this meeting and offers this one Meeting. I said: ready, please come, we are definitely completely We will provide working conditions and safety, the guarantee is one hundred percent. But if We are told we want to meet with you, but you go there for this meeting, it seems to me that these are just their excessive requests to us.

I repeat once again: if someone really wants to meet with us, we Ready. The best place for this is the capital of the Russian Federation, the hero city Moscow.”  {SOURCE}

Vladimir Putin: “We have an open dialogue with President Trump. There is an agreement that in case of We can call, contact, and talk to each other. He knows that I am open to these conversations; And he too – I know about it. But so far, we have not had conversations in Europe based on the results of these consultations. Actually, it was difficult for me to do this, I had just come from China, I’m here. We have no problems with communications here. First.

Secondly, regarding possible military contingents in Ukraine. This is one of the root causes of Ukraine’s involvement in NATO. Therefore, if there are some troops appear, especially now, in the course of hostilities, We proceed from the assumption that these will be legitimate targets for their destruction.

And if solutions are reached that lead to peace, to long-term peace, then I simply do not see any point in them being on the territory of Ukraine, that’s all.

If agreements are reached, let no one doubt that Russia will comply with them in full. We will respect those guarantees security, which, of course, must be worked out both for Russia and for Ukraine. And I repeat once again: of course, Russia will agree to these agreements execute. In any case, no one has discussed this with us on a serious level, that’s all.”