Sunday, August 10, 2025

A Book You Need to Read


“Far from dead, communism as a governing template, seems only to be getting started.” (Sean McMeekin, “To Overthrow the World: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Communism”) 

I’m an historian with a Master’s degree, almost a PhD in history, and taught history in colleges for two decades. 

I’ve read literally thousands of history books, and Sean McMeekin’s “To Overthrow the World: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Communism” (2024) is, easily, in the top five I’ve ever read. 

Meekin is an historian, having taught at Bard College and other locations, and has written several books, nearly all of which I’ve read and find excellent. 

And “To Overthrow the World” is his best so far. 

I don’t know McMeekin personally, and I don’t know, or care about, his politics. All I know is he writes excellent history. 

“To Overthrow the World” is a survey of communism from before Marx to the very present. He is historical, which means he fully, accurately, and effectively elucidates what communism did under Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, indeed, all over the world, though he emphasized the USSR and Communist China. 

His epilogue—which is worth the price of the book—illustrates how the Left’s current attempts as social control (such as Covid lockdowns) insidiously manipulate people into doing what the Left wants them to do. 

McMeekin brilliantly, and perceptively, exposes how, with astonishing stupidity, Western capitalists are 2 fulfilling Marx’s prophecy, “The last capitalist we hang shall be the one who sold us the rope.” 

When it comes to communism, the West is its own worst enemy. McMeeken give credit to communist China for its rapid economic growth, but also explains why and how it happened. 

Greedy American capitalists, not only built the Soviet Union’s industrial might in the 1930s, but have been the catalysts behind Chinese economic growth, a growth they are using to destroy us. 

Read McMeekin to get the whole, disgusting, revolting picture of communism in the last century, and the frustrating way in which, if the West isn’t careful, it’s going to commit suicide, and never realize it is doing so. 

“To Overthrow the World,” indeed.

That’s been the goal all along. To hang ourselves with the rope we sell the communists. 

As someone well said, the problem with socialism is socialism, the problem with capitalism is capitalists. 

Very few American politicians have ever understood Marxism, and so many of them, in their monumental stupidity, have bent over backwards to kiss the communist rear end. 

Franklin Roosevelt was blinder than a bat in this regard. Stalin made a fool out of him, which didn’t take much, yet American historians still rank FDR as one of the country’s greatest Presidents. When the Soviet Union finally collapsed in 1991, those were heady days for Americans. Francis Fukuyama, in 1992, grandly announced in a best seller, that the victory of the West in the Cold War was “the end of history.” 

The fall of communism “marked the endpoint of man’s ideological evolution as western liberal democracy was revealed to be the final form of human government” (McMeekin). 

When I read 3 Fukuyama’s thesis back in the early 1990s (I remember it well), I couldn’t believe anybody would be dumb enough to believe that. But then, folks, I often wonder how people can be stupid enough to believe some of the things they believe. In case you haven’t noticed, communism hasn’t died and western liberal democracy hasn’t swept the world. In fact, it looks like it’s going the other direction. 

Sadly, tragically, indeed, horrifyingly, but not surprisingly, politicians are among the worst. When Bill Clinton worked to get Communist China into the World Trade Organization, his Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said, “By entering the WTO, China committed to free itself from the house that Mao built, including state run enterprises, and central planning institutes.” 

China did no such thing and never intended to. Madeleine Albright was an incredibly stupid woman. Why is it that governments, especially ours, continually attract such people? I hate to be ugly and call somebody “stupid,” but it's just the truth, folks. There are some incredibly dumb people in the world, just like there are some incredibly evil people. And the sooner we learn that, the better off we're going to be. It’s not a difficult concept to master. It has always been this way, always will be, but humanity refuses to learn the lesson. 

The history of communism, especially the CCP, demonstrates how effectively stupidity can be exploited by evil. That's another of the great lessons of history. Evil exploits human stupidity. Marxism has inherent features within that led to its collapse in the Soviet Union, and will eventually do the same in China. But during its existence, Stalin utilized the stupidity (and greed) of the West and killed millions of 4 people in the process. 

The Chinese have done, and are doing, the same thing, and we have merrily let them do it. Fortunately, Ronald Reagan knew an “evil empire” when he saw one. Hopefully, Donald Trump does, too, because no Democrat, and very few Republicans see China for what it really is—evil personified into a empirical monster. 

But, of course, the Democratic Party, increasingly Marxist itself, has been doing pretty much the same thing within our borders--evil exploiting stupidity for its own self-aggrandizement and power. Intelligence is not determined by IQ, folks. I have met countless numbers of incredibly stupid people with very high IQs. 

True intelligence begins here: The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge and wisdom. If you don't start there, then the farther away you get from it, the dumber you are going to be, regardless of how high your IQ is. 

As James Madison said, “The future and success of America is not in this Constitution, but in the laws of God upon which this Constitution is founded.” 

We’ve forgotten that, for sure. 

Read McMeekin. You’ll profit greatly. 




X22, And we Know, and more- August 10

 



Well, 249 Years Was A Pretty Good Run…


Democrats have been wetting themselves over the past week about the idea of Texas redistricting their Congressional seats like, well, Democrats have in the states they control. They can’t handle it; they won’t handle it. Honestly, I don’t care. As Democrats flee Texas like roaches when the light is flipped on, let them destroy it all. We had a good run, right? There comes a time when it is simply no longer worth it, doesn’t there? I mean, 249 years is a pretty good run for a republic. They’re usually destroyed by leftists looking to do things with government power long before now. We had a good run.

My favorite part of the week is these leftist Democrat Governors coming out and saying how they’re going to consider gerrymandering their states beyond where they are, when doing so would be impossible. It shows a lack of self-awareness that has to be some kind of world record, honestly. 

Somehow, someone named Maura Healey managed to get elected Governor of Massachusetts, I assume because the alternative was a sexually abused tube sock. Anyway, this “genius” said if Republicans in Texas go through with what they’re allowed to do under Texas law, her state will have no choice but to revisit their Congressional districts to maximize the number of worthless Democrats they send to DC. 

Of course, the use of “scare quotes” around the word genius earlier was ironic, as Healey did not seem to know that her state was already gerrymandered to the point that there were no Republican House Members. Honestly, how stupid do you have to be?

You have to be as stupid as Democrats in Texas were when they hopped on a private jet and flew to Illinois, another completely gerrymandered state. 

At some point, the people who vote for these idiots will run a serious risk of noticing that all the talk of what they’re going to do should actually be in the past tense, since they’ve already done it. This should cause normal people to begin to understand why it is Republicans in Texas who even thought of this idea. Luckily for Democrats, their voters are not normal people.

Still, the truth will not be able to help but seep through the thick heads of these people, if only by accident. What did they think would happen? All that talk of “threats to democracy” went up in smoke, when people began to realize the threat was coming from inside the house all along…

I honestly don’t know how we can continue to co-exist with people like this – people who scream outrage over actions they have taken. How are we supposed to simply move on? 

They use the power of government every time they get it to force everyone else to do or pay for things they want, no matter how beyond the concept of constitutional they are. What liberalism is now is the use of the power of government to impose its will – to demand conformity and obedience – no matter what. It’s disgusting, but it still cracks me up when leftists consider themselves “anti-fascist” or even “punk,” when they are the antithesis of either of those and pretty much everything good.

Of course, telling them this is as pointless as telling a smoker they smell like cigarettes or a fish that they’re wet. Some people, no matter how you try, just can’t be reached or reasoned with. 

So, where do we go from here? 

I don’t know. 

The only thing that makes sense is the old saying, “When you’re going through hell, keep going.” On the other side, maybe some rational thoughts will prevail. Countries have split before, and other countries have pulled back from the brink. Which will happen here? I have no idea. But sometimes there’s nowhere to go but up.

We shall see, sooner rather than later, I suspect. After all, 249 years was a really good run.



Sunday Gun Day Vol. III Ep. III - The Macabre Tale of Cemetery Guns

By Ward Clark  | 11:00 AM on August 10, 2025  |  RedState

The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of RedState.com.

Credit: Ward Clark

Once Upon a Time…

Back in the day, and by “back in the day” I mean in the Victorian era, medical students and other folks who were engaged in the study of human anatomy sometimes had to resort to creative means to find study subjects – those being cadavers. Add to that the practice of the time in which dead people were buried with personal possessions, like jewelry, and you inevitably had criminal activity involved. Those criminals were grave robbers.

I’ll get around to writing about guns, by the way. Promise.

Every action, as they say, has an equal and opposite reaction. The grave robbers were, of course, active at night, when most ordinary folks, including bereaved families, were not hanging around in cemeteries. This led to some interesting innovations on the part of cemetery groundskeepers.

So why is this relevant in this piece, a column about firearms? Because some of those countermeasures were guns. Booby-trap guns and infernal devices, intended to deter grave robbers, and perhaps to put them in an early grave of their own.

This is how that happened. First, in Britain, back when they still were America, Original Recipe.

The Cemetery Guns

“Cemetery guns” were set guns, basically a short-barreled gun set up with a trip wire. The gun was loaded, primed, planted securely, and the trip wire attached to the trigger. These were originally used for camp defenses against bears and wolves, but were adopted for use in graveyards, and around 1700, the pattern for cemetery guns was more or less formalized; a large-bore flintlock smoothbore, with a belled muzzle like a blunderbuss. Most of them were attached to a heavy plank with a spike that could be driven into the ground to hold the gun firmly in place.


Read More: Sunday Gun Day Vol. II Ep. XXII - The Amazing (Dangerous) Turret Revolver


Some more kind-hearted graveyard keepers would load these guns with rock salt or light bird shot to hurt and discourage grave robbers. Some keepers, though, sought to indirectly increase the population of the cemeteries they guarded by loading the cemetery guns with buckshot or heavy round lead balls.

These guns were typically set up in the evening and removed before any visitors or mourners showed up in the morning, because accidentally wounding a grieving widow just wouldn’t do. When a would-be grave robber tried to sneak in, say, through a hedge, or by climbing the fence, the notion would be that they would hit the trip wire, and BOOM! One messed-up ghoul, with several new orifices somewhere about his body, depending on how the set gun was aimed. In time, the British government deemed these to simply not be sporting at all, old chap, and their use faded – but in America? Leave it to us Americans to take a good idea and take it to the next level.

Casket Guns, Too!

American cemetery keepers got more crafty, though, and made the whole “deterring grave robbers” thing a bit more personal. While the British cemetery guns were generally set up on the grounds, near hedges, fencerows, or anywhere a clandestine entrance to the graveyard might take place, Americans had a better idea. After all, once inside and busily digging up a grave, an enterprising ghoul might reckon himself safe–unless he encountered a casket gun or worse, a casket torpedo.

After the grave guns were banned in Britain, a few other countermeasures popped up over there. Iron and concrete vaults were often used to contain coffins, and some cemeteries used wrought-iron fences with sharp spikes to deter thieves. That worked – for the British. American groundskeepers were inclined to take a more direct approach.


Read More: Sunday Gun Day Vol. II Ep. XV - The Duck Cannon


The grave gun technology wasn’t done yet. In the United States, they were just getting started. In 1878, an enterprising gun crank named Phil Clover, of Ohio, designed and built a short-barreled shotgun that would be placed just inside a coffin lid. Were the lid to be opened, the shotgun would discharge a load of .36-caliber revolver balls into the robbers’ faces, which, as you can imagine, would probably ruin their whole day. Another creative type invented the “grave torpedo,” which was in effect a land mine to be placed in the grave or coffin; some of these contained up to ¾ pound of black powder, placed under a metal plate; this was one of history’s first shape-charge weapons. The only confirmed deployment of one of these I’ve been able to confirm was in 1881 in Knox County, Ohio, where one of three putative grave robbers found an early grave for themselves. Another received a broken leg, while the third was unscathed, although probably scared half to death.

Various state laws, such as the Pennsylvania Anatomy Act of 1883, eventually allowed medical practitioners and schools to legally obtain cadavers for research and education. That, combined with refrigeration, which allowed the longer-term storage of cadavers, cut severely into the grave-robbers’ trade, and made the grave explosives and other morbid weaponry happily obsolete.

These Days:

We’re more civilized these days. Aren’t we? Set guns for these and other purposes were outlawed in Britain in 1827, and most of the United States similarly banned the use of coffin guns and torpedoes in the late 1800s. That’s probably for the best.

These guns would, of course, not be legal now anywhere in the civilized world, including the UK and the USA, and that’s as it should be; a set gun of the kind described would not discriminate between a grave-robber and a couple of kids on a dare, and that’s not good. The casket guns and torpedoes would be even less choosy.

But all the same, it’s an interesting little piece of firearms history, even if it would be more appropriate for Halloween than late summer.

I would note that our oldest granddaughter is in medical school right now, in our more civilized modern era. We recently learned that she has started work on a cadaver, but we feel certain that the cadaver in question was legally donated – no grave robbers or booby-trapped coffins involved. And that’s a good thing.

Rachel Maddow and the Case of the Imaginary Dictatorship


Rachel Maddow is at it again — eyes to the heavens, voice quivering, as if she’s about to narrate the final act of a Ken Burns documentary entitled “America: The Dark Years.”

This week’s cliffhanger? “We have a consolidating dictatorship in our country.”

In Maddow’s latest monologue, she painted Trump’s America as a police-state nightmare — “secret police” supposedly prowling for immigrants, civil life grinding to a halt, the entire nation undergoing a “profound” transformation in just six months. If you closed your eyes, you’d think she was describing Venezuela with better lighting.

Now, I understand Rachel’s job is to frighten the MSNBC faithful into thinking every Trump policy is a page from the Authoritarian for Dummies handbook. But here’s the thing: none of what’s happening right now is a surprise. Not one iota. In fact, it’s exactly what the voters — you know, the people in that pesky little thing called a constitutional republic — elected him to do.

Tariffs? Promised.

Deportations? Promised.

Tax relief? Promised.

Law enforcement actually enforcing laws? Promised.

Booting gender ideology out of schools? Promised.

Supporting the military, telling Iran to sit down and shut up, standing by our allies, creating a fair playing field for American products, rooting out corruption — all promised.

That’s not authoritarianism. That’s called “keeping your campaign promises.” It’s just that in Washington, where most promises evaporate faster than a TikTok trend, actually doing what you said you’d do is treated like sorcery.

But Maddow’s rant was only the appetizer. The real main course of absurdity was served in the comment section.

One person lamented, “It’s not just the leader. GOP Reps, senators, and Supreme Court judges have made this all possible. They are enthusiastically complicit in this.”

To which I replied, “Because we the people put them all there.” That’s how elections work. Shocking, I know.

Another commenter asked, “Where are our elected officials!? Why aren’t they fighting for us?!”

Well, they were replaced in the last election. The people in majorities gave us the officials we have now. That’s the beauty — and the occasional comedy — of a representative republic. If you don’t like them, vote differently next time. This is Civics 101, folks.

Then came my personal favorite: “Vote BLUE on all tickets!!!!”

Do you mean ballots? Because no one votes “in a ticket.” You can vote a “straight ticket” on a ballot, but you don’t vote for tickets. That’s how you end up in the wrong line at a concert, wondering why the opening act is Congress.

One pearl-clutcher declared, “Along with Russia, the USA is the last country on earth I would want to be visiting these days. How can it just collapse into this dictatorship so quickly? Mind-blowing.”

Relax, champ. It’s not a dictatorship. Rachel just flunked civics and took you with her.

Then there was the historian-in-training who opined that the “crazy part” is that Americans aren’t protesting in the streets because we’ve “accepted” this. I responded with the simplest truth in the whole thread: We’re not outraged — we voted for this. Trump increased his vote totals in every single county in the 2024 election. That’s not a coup; that’s an endorsement.

This is where Maddow’s entire premise collapses under its own melodrama. In a dictatorship, leaders don’t need elections — and they certainly don’t increase their support in all 3,143 counties through lawful votes. In an authoritarian state, your ballot doesn’t matter. Here, your ballot is the only thing that matters.

What we have right now isn’t a “consolidating dictatorship.” It’s a thriving, loud, messy, and gloriously frustrating representative constitutional republic. A place where voters make choices, live with those choices, and then decide later if they want to make different ones.

Rachel Maddow’s greatest offense isn’t her over-the-top delivery or her gift for imagining jackbooted thugs behind every traffic stop. It’s that she refuses to direct her ire where it actually belongs: not at Trump, but at the voters — the millions upon millions of Americans who went to the polls in 2024 and said, “Yes, more of that, please.”

You want to be mad about the policies? Fine. Be mad at them. Be mad at every county where Trump’s support grew — which, again, is all of them. But don’t insult the intelligence of the American people by pretending that delivering on campaign promises is the same as dismantling democracy.

Because if keeping promises is authoritarianism, we might just need more of it.



🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Happy Warriors Are Undefeatable


South Park's been making the news a lot due to its satirizing of Trump and members of his administration, which not everyone is taking well. While many a conservative familiar with the show and Matt Stone and Trey Parker's humor are going with the flow, there are conservatives who are indignant. 

As a long-time fan of "South Park," I'll admit that some of the jokes are falling flat and seem pretty undercooked, which is usually what happens when comedians go for low-hanging fruit ad hominems instead of actually letting a joke flow naturally. As I wrote previously, I almost feel like there are two separate teams writing the episodes, Stone and Parker's humor shines through in certain capacities, while some parts of the episodes feel like someone trying to write like Stone and Parker.  

I don't know if there's a larger joke within the joke being told with the show yet, which is oftentimes Stone and Parker's style, but let's assume that they absolutely are on the attack in a mean-spirited, full-on offensive way. 

If that is the case — and I'm not entirely sure it is — then they're failing to damage the intended targets because the targets are simply absorbing the attacks. 

They're laughing at the jokes being told about themselves and even adopting the satirization as a badge of honor. 

First there was Charlie Kirk, whom "South Park" had Eric Cartman morph into. Not only did Kirk adopt the image of Cartman/Kirk as his X profile picture, he posted a clip of Cartman arguing with a leftist woman and complimented the moment, adding a laugh emoji for good measure. 


Then, the DHS did the same, adopting South Park's portrayal of ICE in a post on X that they used as a recruitment ad. 
Then, J.D. Vance noted that he finally made it by posting his own "South Park" character made after him. 

Then, Kristi Noem took the DHS route and utilized her own "South Park" model for an ICE recruitment ad post as well.

This is the way. 

Adopting the joke inoculates you against the damage a joke can do, because what satire attacks more than anything is someone's pride. If you show that your pride isn't so overarching that you can laugh at the satirical jokes made against you, then the jokes are stripped of their offensive aspects, and they just become a shared laugh where the subject is only empowered further and the joke teller looks impotent. 

This is the happy warrior strategy. It's hard to take emotional damage when you're smiling while you fight.

Moreover, there's a valuable lesson here. Pride is a dangerous thing to hold onto and is ultimately a weakness. It's easy to adopt because it's a sort of cheap reinforcement mechanism to your self-image, your public-facing persona, and your beliefs. The issue is that it's ultimately toxic and with the right leverage, can be used against you very easily. 

Think of pride as armor you get from Party City. It looks real from far away, but the moment someone really starts inspecting you up close, or even starts firing arrows at you, it's exposed pretty quickly that all that shine and show was fake, and you're kind of a scared, fragile little fraud. 

The real protection is the ability to take the joke, and to take the joke you can't have a lot of pride. 

And this is what makes the happy warrior so hard to beat. The attacks come and bounce right off. He (or she) enjoys them, even. They're not driven crazy by the fight because the fight is part of the fun. They're not brought down by jokes because they love telling jokes themselves. In fact, it's one of the happy warrior's greatest weapons. 

So, even if "South Park" is being intentionally mean-spirited, then they've already lost the fight. The PR battle was won the moment their jokes were used by the targets as trophies and opportunities to make their own jokes out of them. 

How do you defeat something like that? 



12 States to Ban Junk Food from SNAP



Starting next year, the United States Department of Agriculture will ban residents of six states from using federal benefits to buy junk food. 

President Donald Trump’s administration seeks to make America Healthy Again. 

"Six new states are joining the MAHA movement! Yesterday at the Great American Farmers Market, 
@secrollins and @seckennedy signed food choice state waivers for West Virginia , Florida, Colorado, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas to remove unhealthy foods from SNAP."

About 42 million people nationwide rely on food from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. States distribute debit cards to low-income residents. Residents can swipe cards at grocery stores, convenience stores, and farmers' markets. 

The USDA posted

"Here’s your friendly reminder to shop at your local farmers market! Meet Valley Mill Microgreens founded by Candice Gasper, who discovered her passion for agriculture after volunteering at a local farmers market. Valley Mill Microgreens provides fresh, high-quality produce to local restaurants, caterers, and retailers. We were glad to have them as a vendor at GAFM!"

States that restruct SNAP purchases starting in 2026 include: 

  • Arkansas: Restricts purchase of soda, fruit and vegetable drinks with less than 50% natural juice, unhealthy drinks, and candy. Colorado: Restrict purchase of soft drinks 
  • Florida: Restructs purchase of soda, energy drinks, candy, and prepared desserts 
  • Idaho: Restricts purchase of soda and candy 
  • Iowa: Restricts all taxable food food items except food producing plants and seeds for food producing plants 
  • Louisiana: Restricts purchase of soft drinks, energy drinks, and candy. 
  • Nebraska: Restricts purchase of soft drinks and energy drinks 
  • Oklahoma: Restricts purchase of soft drinks and candy 
  • Texas: Restricts purchase of sweetened drinks and candy 
  • Utah: Restructs purchase of soft drinks 
  • West Virginia: Restricts purchase of soda.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy welcomed the policy change. 

“For years, SNAP has used taxpayer dollars to fund soda and candy—products that fuel America’s diabetes and chronic disease epidemics,” Kennedy said in a statement. “These waivers help put real food back at the center of the program and empower states to lead the charge in protecting public health. I thank these governors who have stepped up to request waivers, and I encourage others to follow their lead. This is how we Make America Healthy Again.”

From August 2021 to August 2023, the prevalence of obesity in adults was 40.3%, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins said that the waivers will provide healthier food to families.

“It is incredible to see so many states take action at this critical moment in our nation’s history and do something to begin to address chronic health problems. President Trump has changed the status quo, and the entire cabinet is taking action to Make America Healthy Again. At USDA, we play a key role in supporting Americans who fall on hard times, and that commitment does not change. Rather, these state waivers promote healthier options for families in need,” Rollins said in a statement.

Commissioner Makary hopes to see other states request waivers. 

“I hope to see all 50 states join this bold commonsense approach. For too long, the root causes of our chronic disease epidemic has been addressed with lip service only. It’s time for powerful changes to our nation’s SNAP program,” Makary said. “The goal is simple—reduce mass suffering from diabetes, obesity, and other long term medical conditions." 

Kennedy aims to remove food coloring from cereal, among other changes. 

Trump's administration has demanded that states hand over identifying data of SNAP residents. The goal is to only distribute benefits to American citizens and eradicate SNAP fraud. 

In May, the USDA charged five people for allegedly stealing $66 million of SNAP benefits. 

The announcement follows Trump reviving the Presidential Fitness Test. 



Mine, Baby, Mine: Trump Admin Goes All-In on Increasing Coal Production


RedState 

The Trump administration is ramping up America's energy production, and everything is on the table, including that archnemesis of the leftist climate scolds - coal. The Trump administration has, in six months, greenlit four major coal projects, drawing a brilliant contrast to the energy-unfriendly Biden administration.

The Trump administration is seeking to boost coal production in the United States with a series of moves it says stand in stark contrast with the record of the Biden administration.

Earlier this week, the Trump administration approved a permit to increase coal mining by green-lighting Montana’s Rosebud Mine, which the Department of the Interior says "enables the recovery of approximately 33.75 million tons of federal coal and extends the mine’s operation through 2039."

The move represents the fourth time in Trump’s second term that a coal mining permit has been granted or extended, including three new permits and one permit expansion.

Other sites opened up include Hurricane Creek Mining, in Tennessee, a project the administration says could produce up to 1.8 million tons of coal over the next 10 years and create 24 local jobs, and Navajo Transitional Energy Company in Montana, which enables the production of 39.9 million tons of federal coal and creation of 280 full-time jobs.

Jobs, energy - what's not to like?

The United States has major coal reserves, 273 billion tons of coal according to the most recent available estimates. That's about a hundred billion tons more than the next two nations with the most coal reserves, those being Russia with 178 billion tons and China with 173 billion. We're the Saudi Arabia of coal, and with increasing technologies making coal cleaner to extract and use to generate electricity, coal is more attractive than ever.

But wait! There's more!

The administration is also touting 13 other projects that are currently at various stages in the permitting process including 8 Lease by Applications and 5 Lease Modification Applications. 

The administration also says that under former President Biden, no new coal permits were granted and touted the president’s efforts in a statement to Fox News Digital. 

What a difference a president makes.

This all comes on the heels of a reduction in coal extraction under the Biden administration:

U.S. production of coal amounted to 512.1 million short tons in 2024, according to preliminary data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). That marked an over 11% decline from the prior year. 

In its "Annual Coal Report" released in April, the EIA said the U.S. produced "less than half of the amount" of coal in 2023, compared to 2008.

Granted, coal isn't as clean as natural gas, nor does it quite the same energy density; and when you compare it to nuclear power, coal falls behind on energy density, cleanliness of operation, pretty much every metric. Coal is also more difficult to transport, requiring trains with hopper cars; you can't put coal into a pipeline. But we make up for a lot of that by having twice as much coal as any other nation on the planet.

There's a lot to be done to revive America's energy portfolio. Coal may not be the ideal fuel of choice, but it has to be part of the picture. Right now, everything has to be part of the picture. Energy is critical. Everything depends on it. And we need to shoot every arrow in our energy quiver, if we are to make the United States once more a major industrial power.



WATCH: Think tank says $100K Tumwater solar-powered EV charger falling short

 
City of Tumwater, WA Pionner Park Solar-powered EV charger from city of Tumwater Video 
Tumwater Solar EV charger | Screenshot City of Tumwater

By Carleen Johnson | The Center Square | Aug 8, 2025 

(The Center Square) – Ten months after Tumwater, Wash., installed a solar-powered electric vehicle charger in a city park, new data obtained by the Washington Policy Center think tank indicates the EV charger has not lived up to promises made by city officials.

As reported by The Center Square last summercity officials touted the off-grid nature of the pilot program’s charger, which relies on solar power and battery backup to avoid straining the grid. The charging station in Pioneer Park is ADA accessible and includes a 110-volt outlet for charging electric wheelchairs and bikes. It is also free to use by the public.

“This will be especially helpful in areas where we don’t have existing electrical capacity, or we don’t want to trench through things like athletic fields,” Alyssa Jones Wood, the city’s sustainability manager, said at the time. “This is a pilot, so it has the opportunity to scale up if successful.”

The Washington State Department of Commerce awarded Tumwater a $87,052 grant to install the charger and for maintenance. The city matched that grant with $12,742 from its General Fund allocation for Sustainability Initiatives.

“When the system was installed, it was claimed it could provide 300 miles per day,” Todd Myers, WPC’s vice president for research, wrote in a Thursday blog. “On average, the charger has delivered less than 8% of that amount, about 22 miles per day.”

In a Thursday interview with The Center Square, Myers elaborated on the data.

The Center Square's Carleen Johnson Interviews the Washington Policy Center's Vice President for Research, Todd Myers

“After 10 months in service, the system has delivered 1,700 kilowatt-hours of electricity to EVs, the equivalent of 6,800 miles worth of charge for a Tesla Model 3, in all that time,” he said.

Myers noted he was extremely skeptical from the beginning that the project could generate anywhere near what the city projected.

“Tumwater, Wash., is not Phoenix, Ariz. It is literally the worst place in America for solar power … and that's just because it's cloudy most of the time,” he observed.

He noted the National Renewable Energy Laboratory has a solar radiation map for all parts of the country. Outside of Alaska, Western Washington fares the worst in terms of sunshine received.

“So, they say it is still reducing CO2 emissions. It has delivered 1.7 megawatt hours of electricity. That's about 1,400 pounds of CO2. That is nothing,” Myers explained.  “On current prices, that's worth about $37. So, you spent $85,000 to save $37 in the first 10 months.”

He noted that even stretching out the benefit over time does not translate into a worthwhile investment.

“Let’s say this lasts for 20 years,” Myers said. “It won’t, but let's say it lasts for 20 years. That's less than $1,000 of value that you spent $85,000 extra today for. So, it's incredibly wasteful.”

Project supporters in Tumwater indicated they would partner with a company to collect data on usage for the solar EV charger.

“When I reached out to Tumwater to ask them, ‘Can you send me the data?’ what they said was that the company that was providing more granular detail on the data went out of business last year,” Myers told The Center Square. “So, all they have are just sort of the raw data from the system that they can download. They don't have type, and they don't have who's using it .... it's just raw data.”

Myers argues that Washington’s EV charger grants encourage waste by distorting the costs and benefits.

“This is a common problem, which is that cities like to say, ‘Look, we're on the cutting edge. We're leaders in this.’ And then they go out and they buy technology and then the technology either fails, or the company goes out of business,” he said. “We've seen this in lots of places.”

Tumwater Communications Manager Jason Wettstein responded to a request for comment about Myers' criticism. 

"People across the country are working to find ways to reduce harmful air pollution that is warming our planet and contributing to natural disasters, and learning through pilot projects like this contributes to that important objective,” Wettstein emailed The Center Square.

“A goal of this pilot project was to increase the amount of publicly available EV charging, and this seemed like a cost-effective way to do that. One other aspect that is harder to monetize is the fact that Pioneer Park floods. The Beam unit, unlike other traditional chargers, is flood-proof up to 9.5 feet.”

Myers noted that city and state officials using taxpayer money for environmental projects that don’t pan out provides skeptics with more ammunition.

“This has sort of become a metaphor for Washington state's climate policy, where we make all these big promises. We do press releases. We brag about what a leader we are. And then a year later, we find that none of those promises have been met, and a lot of money has been wasted for no environmental benefit,” Myers said. “We know how to do things for the environment where we can deliver on the promises and results. Politicians just choose not to, and they need to be held accountable for it.”