Thursday, July 3, 2025

You Can’t Celebrate 1776 While Ignoring The Invasion We’re Dealing With In 2025


If we ignore the invasion that has occurred, we’re not honoring the founders, we’re betraying them.



While millions of Americans gather to celebrate Independence Day, the very sovereignty that this holiday honors is slipping away right before our eyes. Beneath the parades and patriotic displays, the nation is reeling from the consequences of a mass invasion — and the only solution to the problem is being fought by the left and the political ruling class.

On July 4, 1776, 56 men pledged their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor to a cause that could cost them everything. These men weren’t simply protesting a tax they didn’t like or quibbling over policy — they rebelled against the most powerful empire on earth. If they failed, death would be certain. But they signed anyway, because to them, the cause was greater than comfort. It was about a people asserting their right to self-governance based on the natural rights of man — life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

The founders knew something modern elites seem determined to ignore, however: Not every people is capable of sustaining that kind of government. Self-government requires a certain character and cohesion. Alexander Hamilton said as much in 1799: “I hold with Montesquieu, that a government must be fitted to a nation, as much as a coat to the individual; and, consequently, that what may be good at Philadelphia may be bad at Paris, and ridiculous at Petersburg.”

In other words, not every people was capable of political freedom because not every people is grounded in the same moral code, religion, civic understanding, and cultural norms that helped forge this nation. A republic is not held together by geography, but by bonds of belonging and loyalty. It requires a people who speak the same language, revere the same traditions, and share the same worldview and morality.

As George Washington reminded in his farewell address, “The name of American, which belongs to you in your national capacity, must always exalt the just pride of patriotism more than any appellation derived from local discriminations. With slight shades of difference, you have the same religion, manners, habits, and political principles. You have in a common cause fought and triumphed together; the independence and liberty you possess are the work of joint counsels, and joint efforts of common dangers, sufferings, and successes.”

But 249 years later that national identity is being erased.

Under then-President Joe Biden, the nation allowed more than 10 million illegal aliens to invade the country, overwhelm cities, bankrupt social programs, and devastate American communities. But, notably, it’s not just mass illegal immigration that is a problem, but mass migration, legal and illegal.

Mass migration, as I’ve previously written, is a cultural wrecking ball, because without assimilation there is no America. And assimilation on any meaningful scale is impossible when millions arrive illegally and remain indefinitely.

As Alexander Hamilton warned in 1802, “The safety of a republic depends essentially on the energy of a common National sentiment; on a uniformity of principles and habits; on the exemption of the citizens from foreign bias, and prejudice; and on that love of country which will almost invariably be found to be closely connected with birth, education and family.”

As I previously wrote, mass migration destroys that “common National sentiment” and disrupts the “uniformity of principles.” Mass migration “severs the deep-rooted ties of tradition and shared identity that bind a republic together.”

Which brings us to the greatest, most pressing policy questions for our generation: mass deportations.

Despite insistence from the left that mass deportations are cruel, they’re not. They are what a sovereign nation does to protect its people. We have millions of unassimilated illegal aliens in the country, many of whom have recently taken to the streets of major cities to burn the American flag, demand rights they are not owed, and sow societal discord. They’re not building cohesion; they’re causing a degree of division that makes a well-governed society impossible.

But the left is using the courts to halt or slow President Donald Trump’s mass deportation efforts, fighting tooth and nail to bring back deported alleged wife-beaters and human smugglers. When Trump tried to strip nearly half a million migrants of a made-up status granted to them by the Biden administration, an Obama-appointed judge ruled that each individual case must be adjudicated individually. It’s a paralyzing decision — as noted by White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller on X: “If every one of them got the trial that you’re asking for, it would take centuries to remove them.”

But that’s the entire purpose. The left is desperate to stall mass deportations for a host of political goals, including congressional and Electoral College apportionment. And, in their effort to turn America into just another globalist spot on the map, they know they must undo the bonds of liberty. What better way to do that than to import a host of foreigners who refuse to assimilate and bring with them values, religions, and moral codes that do not comport with American values?

If we are going to honor 1776, we can’t simply light fireworks and wave our flag. We have to act like the founders did — with courage, clarity, and a commitment to national survival. That means choosing Americans — our communities, our future — over foreign nationals.

The spirit of 1776 was about forging a nation — a nation defined by a common identity, beliefs, and borders. If we ignore the invasion that has occurred, we’re not honoring the founders — we’re betraying them.



Only 36% Of Democrats Are Proud To Be American

It is worth noting when significant portions of one party reject being proud to be American in the span of one decade, while another remains completely unaffected by the shift in sentiment.



Gallup poll revealed Monday that only 36 percent of Democrats say they are proud to be an American, down from 87 percent in 2001. Meanwhile, at least 84 percent of Republicans have identified themselves as proud Americans throughout the last 24 years.

According to the poll conducted in early June, 87 percent of Democrats in 2001 identified as “extremely” or “very” proud to be American, compared to 36 percent in 2025. Meanwhile, 92 percent of Republican respondents said they were proud to be American, an increase from 90 percent in 2001.

A respondent is identified as a “proud” American if they report being either “extremely” or “very” proud to be American, as opposed to “moderately,” “only a little,” or “not at all.” “Proud” answers were the norm for Americans before the most recent decade and remained consistently high across the political spectrum from 2005-2015, ranging from 81 percent to 85 percent. However, the first significant nosedive was seen in 2017, when only 75 percent of respondents said they were proud as opposed to 81 percent the previous year. Enthusiasm has continued to fall since then. In 2025, American pride among respondents sits at a record low of 58 percent. Most of the variation is found in the answers of Democrats and Independents.

Democrat respondents’ pride appeared to be more affected by which party held the White House, a factor which may play a role in the recent plunge. The first and second Trump administrations coincide with both major dips in Democrat patriotism. In response to these statistics, Brad Smith, law professor at Capital University Law School, suggested in a post on X that Democrats’ pride hinges more in their success as a party than consistent loyalty to the nation as a whole.

Another notable distinction can be seen generationally. Even among Republicans, younger people expressed consistently less pride in being American than the generations prior. While 77% of Democrats and 92% of Republicans among the Greatest and Silent Generations responded that they were proud to be American from 2016-2025, only 24% and 65% of Democrats and Republicans, respectively, in Generation Z responded likewise.

While Democrat respondents’ pride in being American has consistently been lower than Republicans’, the severe plunge from 80% to 36% in a ten-year span is novel and striking. This shift in sentiment is manifesting culturally as well. Over the past several years, popular culture has repeatedly downplayed and undermined national pride, instead advertising a critical stance.

The New York Times published an article in 2023 with the headline, “No More Sparklers for These Folks,” anecdotally listing the downsides of celebrating the Fourth of July both ideologically and practically. A related sentiment is echoed in the Reader’s Digest article, “I’m a Black American — Here’s Why I’m Not Celebrating the Fourth of July,” published in 2024. Similarly, elite academic institutions have increasingly promoted anti-American rhetoric in their teaching and literature, such as Harvard Gazette’s article, “Why America Can’t Escape it’s Racist Roots.”

Not only has popular culture and academia betrayed patriotic sentiment; the Democrat platform has joined these institutions in anti-Americanism, advocating open borders, critical race theory, gender ideology, and socialist policies. It is not surprising that between mainstream culture and their own party’s platform, their constituents lack pride in being American.

Whether this sharp decrease in patriotism is the result or the cause of popular culture, it warns of yet another unyielding ideological division along partisan lines. It is worth noting when significant portions of one party reject being proud to be American in the span of one decade, while another remains completely unaffected by the shift in sentiment. This harsh divide will inevitably have difficult ramifications on political discourse.



Target Finding Out What Happens When You Cut Off Money for the Congressional Black Caucus Nonprofit


Becky Noble reporting for RedState 

One of the first things President Donald Trump did upon his return to the White House was to sign an executive order eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs nationwide. And as we found out during Pride Month, many corporate sponsors dropped their sponsorship of those events. But as usual, Democrats and the left have no problem doing a little arm-twisting to get what they want when it comes to all things DEI. Now, an infamous group of House members is putting the squeeze on a corporation that is discovering that once you cave to those woke demands, you are trapped.

The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) is threatening to put the screws to retail giant Target in the form of a boycott. This is in response to Target's announcement that they would be ending DEI initiatives, including the termination of a corporate sponsorship program that has been an economic boon to the group's nonprofit arm. 

In 2020, in the aftermath of the death of George Floyd, a stampede of companies and corporations donated huge sums of money to various enterprises that pledged to further the cause of social justice. Target was at the front of the line, donating at least $1.4 million to the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, a think tank that works with the caucus. Target then pledged $1 million over the next five years through its "Racial Equity Action and Change" (REACH) initiative to "advance social justice and racial equity for Black individuals," which was topped off with a $200,000 donation for "meeting expenses" in December to "honor" several caucus members. 

But Target shut down the DEI cash flow after the Trump executive order, and also announced that they would be cutting back REACH and revisiting "corporate partnerships to ensure they are directly connected to our roadmap for growth." The CBC Foundation appeared to be ripe for slashing. Now, the CBC has decided they need to show Target who's boss, and is essentially saying to them, "nice retail chain you got there, would be a shame if there was a boycott" unless they reinstate DEI programs. The CBC's politely worded statement after a meeting with Target CEO Brian Cornell read in part that they:

...warned that efforts to restore consumer and public trust without genuine action and accountability would risk inflicting lasting damage to the company’s brand and credibility. 

Translation: get in line or else.

However, the chairman of the conservative watchdog group, National and Legal Policy Center, Peter Flaherty, is wise to the CBC's game, saying:

The Congressional Black Caucus threat of a boycott after Target ended financial support has all the earmarks of a shakedown. CEO Brian Cornell has always been an easy mark for racial activists.

Flaherty also noted that, ironically, Cornell met with Rev. Al Sharpton earlier this year about a potential boycott. What a coincidence. 

The CBC and its "foundation" have been the subject of scrutiny as far back as 2010. CBC members have been big backers of some of the heaviest donors to the foundation, including the online poker industry and AT&T. And you know it's sketchy when even liberal groups like Color of Change and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington have questioned the CBC and its relationship with the foundation. The New York Times has also written that the CBC and the CBC Foundation "are so deeply connected it is sometimes hard to tell where one ends and the other begins."

As for Target, they are finding out exactly what happens when you cave to Democrats and the left on anything. Once you do it, you are trapped, and there is no easy way of getting out. And how do they know that if they do pony up the cash, the CBC still won't call in their boycott foot soldiers? The answer is, they don't. Target's hard learned lesson: When you go woke, there is more than one way you can go broke.

"The CEO also emphasized that Target’s values of 'inclusivity, connection, drive' are 'not up for debate' and said that the company is 'committed' to sharing how its values create an impact." 

This reversal came after Cornell met with Al Sharpton. 

We are losing this battle.



FBI ‘Suppressed Intelligence’ On Chinese Meddling In 2020 To Cover For Christopher Wray

Grassley’s office says that the evidence was never investigated further, despite signs of credibility, because of a ‘sudden and “abnormal”‘ decision to stop further proceedings and ‘bury the IIR’s existence,’ because, as the FBI put it, ‘the reporting will contradict Director Wray’s testimony.’



The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) interfered with an investigation into Chinese meddling in the 2020 election to cover for former Director Christopher Wray, who had just testified to Congress that he had seen no evidence of a coordinated voter fraud effort, According to previously classified documents released Tuesday by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa.

The FBI “suppressed intelligence” of alleged Chinese Communist Party (CCP) interference in the 2020 election, including the production of ‘”tens of thousands’ of fraudulent drivers’ licenses to manufacture mail-in votes for then-presidential candidate Joe Biden,” according to a press release.

“These records smack of political decision-making and prove the Wray-led FBI to be a deeply broken institution. Ahead of a high-stakes election happening amid an unprecedented global pandemic, the FBI turned its back on its national security mission,” Grassley said. “One way or the other, intelligence must be fully investigated to determine whether it’s true, or if it’s just smoke and mirrors. Chris Wray’s FBI wasn’t looking out for the American people – it was looking to save its own image.”

Grassley released the documents after FBI Director Kash Patel declassified them and sent them to the Senate.

The apparent proof of a conspiracy to protect Wray come after Patel in June declassified documents further detailing the attempt from the CCP to produce the fake IDs to be used as validation of mail-in ballots and rig the 2020 election for Biden, as The Federalist reported.

According to Customs and Border Protection (CBP), officers caught 1,513 shipments of fraudulent documents, including 19,888 driver’s licenses, between January and June 2020, the majority of which came from China and Hong Kong.

Records released Tuesday show the FBI’s decision to “recall and suppress” a Sept. 25, 2020, Intelligence Information Report (IIR) from the Bureau’s Albany Field Office, which included information from a Confidential Human Source (CHS) showing evidence of the CCP plot.

Grassley’s office says that the evidence was never investigated further, despite signs of credibility, because of a “sudden and ‘abnormal'” decision to stop further proceedings and “bury the IIR’s existence,” because, as the FBI put it, “the reporting will contradict Director Wray’s testimony.”

“Most concerning to me, is stating the reporting would contradict with Director Wray’s testimony. I found this troubling because it implied to me that one of the reasons we aren’t putting this out is for a political reason, which goes directly against our organization’s mission to remain apolitical and simply state what we know,” an FBI Albany intelligence analyst said. “Likewise, at the field operational level, I do not feel it is our job to assess whether or not our intelligence aligns with the Director. … My concern is that I think it gets dangerous if we cite potential political implications as reasons for not putting out our information.” 

The FBI recalled the report to “re-interview the source,” but also told “recipients” to “destroy all copies of the original report and remove the original report from all computer holdings.”

One day prior to the original report, Wray had testified in a Senate hearing that he had not seen any evidence of wide spready vote-by-mail fraud, but that if he did, it would be something the FBI “would investigate seriously … and aggressively.”

“We have not seen historically any kind of coordinated national voter fraud effort in a major election, whether it is by mail or otherwise,” Wray testified at the time. “[B]ut people should make no mistake we are vigilant as to the threat and watching it carefully, because we are in uncharted new territory.” 

Apparently not enough to pursue credible evidence of a scheme from the Chinese to rig mail-in ballots in favor of Biden. The rationale provided to Albany staff for the recall was that Headquarters deemed the report not “authoritative,” but this characterization was met with disagreement by those in the Albany office,” a June 27 letter from FBI Assistant Director Marshall Yates to Grassley states. “Albany staff further warned against FBI assuming the role of sole gatekeeper for the Intelligence Community (IC), emphasizing that suppressing field-generated reporting could deprive other IC elements of the opportunity to corroborate or discredit intelligence.”

According to FBI emails released from Grassley, Albany Field Office agents kept asking why the report would not be released, with the response being, “Again, the reporting will contradict Director Wray’s testimony.”

A subsequent reply from an agent stated, “I’m not trying to be a pain on this, but after taking some time thinking this over I just want to voice my opinion and concerns on this issue and make it clear I do not agree with the reasoning for not putting this out.”

“Now’s the time to rebuild the FBI’s trust,” Grassley said. “Director Patel’s willingness to work with me to establish renewed transparency and accountability is a critical part of that process, and I applaud him for his efforts.” 



Numbers Behind Trump’s Biggest Win Could Doom Dying Democratic Party


‘Trump won with a voter coalition that was more racially and ethnically diverse than in 2020 or 2016,’ Pew Research finds.



It turns out that raising taxes, rallying around violent illegal immigrants, and standing up for antisemitism and dudes in women’s sports is a recipe for political disaster — unless you’re running for mayor of New York City

The latest deep dive into the numbers behind Donald Trump’s historic victory over political insanity should be a wake-up call for Democrats. It won’t. 

Pew Research Center’s analysis of the 2024 election validates what we already suspected, shedding greater light on how the Republican became only the second candidate in U.S. history to win a second nonconsecutive term in the White House. Trump did so by expanding his base with voters fatigued by the excesses of the radical left — particularly among minority groups that Democrats have long taken for granted. 

“Trump won with a voter coalition that was more racially and ethnically diverse than in 2020 or 2016,” Pew’s study states. The data centers on the more reliable validated voters — those confirmed to have voted in the election. 

‘Considerably More Diverse’

Trump easily won the popular vote and the electoral college (312) in defeating former Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democrats’ anointed replacement candidate for the cognitively compromised Joe Biden. Trump, thanks in large part to Harris’ inability to hide from her record supporting incredibly unpopular policies, chipped off the left’s traditionally reliable base, black and other nonwhite voters, according to the analysis. He won 15 percent of black voters, up from 8 percent in 2020, and claimed 40 percent of Asian voters to Harris’ 57%. Harris suffered a 13 percentage point drop in Asian voter support compared to Biden’s 2020 totals. 

Trump’s most impressive gains were in the larger bloc of Hispanic voters, battling to near parity with 48 percent of the vote to Harris’ 51 percent. Biden won 61 percent of the Hispanic vote in 2020 compared to Trump’s 36 percent. According to Pew’s study, Trump benefited from higher turnout from Republicans and some Democrat defectors. 

“He also held an edge over Harris among voters who did not vote four years earlier – a group that was considerably more diverse than those who voted in both elections,” the report states. 

Voters who sat out the 2020 election experienced firsthand the miserable consequences of doing so. You can understand why they didn’t want to take that chance again. 

‘People Are Waking Up’

Tony Delgado, CEO of Latino Wall Street and former Hispanic director for Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s presidential campaign, said Democrats have gone so far left they have left the country. Delgado, like a lot of Hispanic Americans, said he grew up in a Catholic Democrat household that revered  “Jesus, John F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr.” 

“Now, dude, it’s crazy. [Democrats] are supporting issues and pushing policies so extreme, so radical, no one supports them,” Delgado told me this week in a phone interview from Miami, fresh from the CPAC Latino summit. This year, the Conservative Political Action Conference teamed up with Latino Wall Street to “defend American Values: Faith, Family and Freedom.” 

Delgado said a lot of Hispanic voters believe those core values are under assault by a far-left Democratic Party that has left them behind.

“I think people are waking up,” he said. “I think Cardi B reading from a fake script off of phone at a Kamala Harris rally, they’re not fooling anyone. In fact, they really [expletive deleted] insulted us this time around.”

‘A Very Long Time’

Men overall backed Trump over Harris  (55%-43%), according to the Pew analysis, with men under 50 giving Trump a slight edge (49% to 48% for Harris) after Biden won the group by 10 parentage points (53% to 43%) in 2020.  

But Trump edged out Harris among Hispanic men (50% to 48%), a remarkable 20-point turnaround for the Republican from 2020. 

The Pew data show 21 percent of black men voted for Trump, to Harris’ 75 percent. In 2020, Biden claimed 87 percent of the vote, with Trump garnering just 12 percent. 

DaSean Gallishaw, a black man from Fairfax, Va., told the Associated Press in November that he voted for Trump because Democrats’ rhetoric failed to match their actions. “It’s been a very long time since the Democrats ever really kept their promises to what they’re going to do for the minority communities,” he said, adding that he thought the Republican Party’s “minority community outreach really showed up.”

For many Americans, 2024 really was the economy, stupid. And Biden and his leftist friends made a mess of the economy — the No. 1 issue in the election. 

Trump also made significant inroads with Hispanic women, losing the category by only 6 percentage points (52% to 46%). Trump picked up just 33 percent of the the vote in 2020 to Biden’s 65 percent. Women overall favored Harris by 7 percentage points, but Trump made slight gains from 2020 and Harris’ support slid a couple of notches from Biden’s performance. 

A Matter of Faith

After years of Democrat-led DEI initiatives, trans insanity, and the left’s war on Judeo-Christian values, the faithful stood up. 

The Pew analysis found nearly two-thirds of voters (64%) who attend faith-based services monthly or more voted for Trump. Harris received little more than a third of the church-going vote. Perhaps an October campaign stop in Wisconsin crystalized things for Christians. Protesters in the crowd at the Harris rally shouted, “Christ is king!” and “Jesus is Lord!”, interrupting the former VP as she was berating Trump for nominating Supreme Court justices who put an end to nationalized abortion.  

“Oh, you guys are at the wrong rally,” Harris mocked, to her supporters’ delight. “No, I think you meant to go to the smaller one down the street,” she added, chortling and waving to the protesters as they were escorted out of the event. 

Like the rest of the accomplice media, PBS seemed absolutely baffled by Trump’s big victory. Post-election, PBS reporter Geoff Bennett sat down with a real Christian to try to find out what the hell happened. 

“Well before the election, you predicted that Latinos and Latino evangelicals in particular would vote for Donald Trump. Why?” the reporter asked Pastor Samuel Rodriguez, president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference and a former adviser to presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama. 

Rodriguez told Bennett that November’s election “was the official breaking up of the Latino community with the Democratic Party.” He explained what the left has failed to get. 

“The primary reason I do believe has to do with faith,” Rodriguez said. “Latinos are becoming more and more evangelical every single year. That evangelical ethos will prompt them to embrace what you would deem as conservative values, what we deem as biblically substantiated truths. So Latinos are becoming more conservative because of their faith.”

Rodriguez also believes Hispanics are voting more Republican because the Democratic Party “abandoned the party of Barack Obama.” He considers it a more moderate time in liberal politics. Amazingly, it was. But in his two terms and post-presidential life, “racial arsonist” Obama lit the fuse on the identity politics that has roiled the party and the country for the better part of the past 20 years.  

Testing Success

The polling shows what the outcome of last November’s political contest told us: Americans have grown tired of the extreme left that is now the rudder for the Democratic Party ship. According to Pew, Republicans and Independents who lean that way made up 51 percent of the electorate in 2024, up 4 percentage points from the 2020 election.  

“Trump didn’t win because he got disaffected Democrats and independents to vote for him; he won because he got those people to switch parties entirely,” Henry Olson, Senior Fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, wrote in the New York Post. “It’s likely, then, that 2024 was the first presidential election since at least 1932 where more voters were Republicans than Democrats.”

The question now is, how do Republicans build on the expanded voter base Trump delivered in 2024? More so, how do they not screw up their success? The GOP better have some good answers to those questions in next year’s big political test: Midterms sans Donald Trump on the ballot. 

Delgado said Hispanics will continue to flee a Democratic Party they can no longer identify with. The entrepreneur and grassroots activist said he does worry about the impact of the Trump administration’s immigration law enforcement and deportation policies could have on Hispanic voters in 2026. He believes it’s a balancing act in cleaning up the illegal immigration mess that Biden made. Delgado is pushing passage of Florida Republican Rep. Maria Salazar’s Dignity Act, which would provide a pathway to citizenship or at least legal status for millions of illegal immigrants. 

But Trump campaigned on mass deportations, and Republicans back him on that. A new PBS News/NPR/Marist poll shows 80 percent of Republican voters surveyed said Immigration & Customs Enforcement actions are “about right” or that the agency “has not gone far enough.” While the poll shows 54 percent of respondents say ICE has gone too far, it also found 80 percent of Americans support or strongly support the federal government’s efforts to deport illegal immigrants convicted of a violent crime. And a solid majority (59 percent) support deporting illegal aliens convicted of nonviolent crimes. 

“Meanwhile, a plurality of Americans — 43% — believe the current U.S. deportation policies are making the U.S. safer. That’s compared to 33% who say they’re making the nation less safe and another 24% who say they’re not having an effect either way,” the left-leaning PBS reported. 

Illegal immigration, more so the Biden administration-sponsored invasion of America was, after all, one of the top issues on voters’ minds as they went into Election Day 2024. It remains a top concern. 

“Biden created the problem and it’s going to be up to President Trump and Republicans to fix the problem,” Delgado said. 



♦️𝐖³𝐏 𝐃𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝

 


W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Welcome to the W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Post whatever you got in the comments section below.

This feature will post every day at 6:30am Mountain time.