Friday, June 27, 2025

Is Trump the Greatest Knuckleballer of All Time?


In baseball there is a rare but beautiful pitch known as the knuckleball.  It is difficult to learn and takes a lifetime to perfect.  It glides through the air without spin and zigzags from side to side before reaching the plate.  Even the best knuckleball pitchers struggle to throw it effectively.  Most catchers simply can’t react fast enough to the ball’s late movements to keep it in their mitts.  Hall of Fame hitters look silly as they swing two feet away from a ball traveling slowly around their bats.  When a knuckleball pitcher is on his game, batters never look more frustrated.

President Trump might just be the greatest knuckleballer of all time.  In both domestic and foreign policy, he throws these pitches whose in-air movements seem to betray the laws of physics.  His adversaries stand at the plate with big smiles and expect to launch Trump’s slow tosses over the fence.  His putative allies trying to catch the ball behind home plate don’t like what they see and keep calling for a different pitch.  But the president just grins and says, Now watch: I’m going to throw this thing very slowly, and that guy up there will fall over trying to hit it.  It’ll be fabulous.  And that’s exactly what happens.

As I write this, there is a tenuous ceasefire between Iran and Israel after two weeks of fighting.  Trump is already trademarking it “The 12 Day War.”  Will peace prevail?  We will see.  But did anybody expect the possibility?  Not really. 

The president’s announcement of an end to the war came only two days after he sent American pilots on a daring mission to obliterate Iran’s nuclear facilities.  That operation, codenamed Midnight Hammer, included multiple head fakes.  While President Trump indicated that he might take two weeks before hitting Iran, decoy B-2s headed West to Guam.  With the eyes of the world looking in the wrong direction, stealth bombers took off from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri for an 18-hour journey into hostile territory.  The pitch came in slow and steady and struck Iran’s nuclear capabilities before anyone even knew the ball was in the catcher’s mitt.

The reaction to Trump’s nuclear strikeout was as frantic as a hitter slamming his bat on the ground after swinging at a ball bouncing several feet before the plate.  Those who have argued against any new U.S.-led wars in the Middle East immediately feared a protracted conflict.  Those who have argued for regime change in Iran hoped that U.S. boots on the ground would soon follow.  Democrats who had been calling Trump a “chicken” for going easy on Iran flipped positions, condemned the attack, and started calling for his impeachment.  All the while, Trump’s special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, was working behind the scenes to find a peaceful solution.

The ball zigzags through the air, and nobody is sure where it will land.  Three paragraphs after noting that there is a “tenuous ceasefire,” I must add that Iran and Israel are now exchanging fire, and President Trump is rhetorically spanking both countries.  Because his administration is working desperately for Middle East peace, the same pundits who applauded his Iran attack yesterday are mad today.  Similarly, those who excoriated the attack as “unconstitutional” yesterday are today having second thoughts.  As witty catcher Bob Uecker once said, “the way to catch a knuckleball is to wait until it stops rolling and pick it up.”  Right now Trump’s knuckleball in the Middle East is still rolling.

One of the crazy things about a knuckleball pitcher is that the effectiveness of the pitch can ebb and flow.  I loved watching Tim Wakefield throw for the Boston Red Sox.  He could make the Bronx Bombers look like Little Leaguers still hitting from a tee.  But sometimes he’d throw two or three awful innings and give up a bunch of runs.  Most managers pull their pitchers when that happens; it takes a manager with nerves of steel to stick with a knuckleballer handing out home runs.  Even when Ol’ Wake was struggling, though, he could often miraculously turn things around and pitch a lights-out complete game.  When using a knuckleballer to strike out the side, patience is the key.

The reactions of Russia and China have been interesting to watch.  In the past, Russia has positioned assets near Iran to dissuade Western attacks.  This time around, it is preoccupied with war in Ukraine.  Although former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev had harsh words for President Trump after the U.S. destroyed Iran’s nuclear sites, President Putin has remained relatively quiet.  Similarly, communist China has said and done little in response to the attack.  When you consider that Putin is busy seeking Trump’s assistance in bringing the European war to an end and that China is heavily reliant upon Iranian oil, it becomes clear that this was an ideal time to eliminate Iran’s nuclear threat.  Sometimes a knuckleballer gets batters so mixed up that they just give up.

Meanwhile, President Trump’s adversaries here at home can’t stop whiffing on his pitches, either.  Democrats said that food and fuel prices would continue to rise; instead, both have steadily declined.  Democrats said that the president’s use of tariffs to recalibrate global trade would increase inflation; instead, inflation is lower than it has been since Trump’s first term.  Democrats said that Americans would reject President Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration; instead, the public overwhelmingly backs the president’s actions.

Think of some of the crazy pitches that Trump has used to strike out the Democrat party.  He has Democrats defending Hamas baby-killers, Iranian “Death to America” terrorists, violent illegal aliens, child castration, and men beating up women in competitive sports.  The president keeps telling his catcher, Watch: I’ll get them to argue against sending foreign murderers and rapists back to their own countries.  The umpire is listening and murmuring, What kind of moron would swing at that?  And Trump just smiles and whispers behind his glove, The kind of morons who vote for Hillary, Kamala, and Dementia Joe, that’s who!  Trump releases the ball, and while it moves in midair, the Democrats call him vulgar names.  Dim-Dems hack at it from all directions but strike out as the ball travels slowly across the plate.

As funny as it is to see Democrats swinging ferociously and falling to the ground with every Trump pitch, it is also pretty amusing to see all the players supposedly on his team freaking out from the dugout.  The neocons are screaming for endless war.  The so-called “free traders” are busy disparaging tariffs.  The multinational conglomerates hope that they’ll still get to use slave labor overseas.  The Establishment Old Guard are tired of Trump’s “culture war” at home and want to get back to the business of making money from real war in Ukraine.  Batboy Volodymyr Zelensky thinks it’s time to put in a new pitcher.  Why can’t he just pitch like a normal Republican? the benchwarmers keep asking one another.  Nobody’s seen a Republican knuckleballer on the mound before.

One thing that separates Trump from most knuckleballers, though, is that he occasionally uses other pitches.  By eliminating USAID and other government slush funds for Democrats, he hurls curveballs that keep the opposition off-balance.  By eliminating federal grants for universities that coddle terrorists and discriminate against female athletes, he throws a nasty cutter that gets Democrats chasing pitches outside the strike zone.  And sometimes, when his adversaries are least expecting it, he throws a blazing heater high and tight.  

President Trump is a dangerous knuckleballer because he keeps everyone guessing.  His unpredictability confounds adversaries.  And every once in a while, he throws a Massive Ordnance Penetrator right down the middle for a strike.



X22, And we Know, and more- June 27

 



Democrats and Their Media Allies Root Against America


Following the very successful mission to destroy the Iranian nuclear weapons program conducted by the U.S. military under the Trump administration, the so-called ‘mainstream news media’ has been quick to try to downplay the success of the operation.  It’s as though they cannot accept the fact that our warfighters, when they are serving under real leadership like SECDEF Hegseth, CJOS Caine, and the Commander in Chief President Donald Trump, are able to pull off one of the most complicated and highly successful military operations in American history.

To give credit where credit is due to the Trump administration would go against the severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome that the news media suffers from.  As well as going against the partnership they have with the Democrat Party to discredit anything positive that the Trump administration does.  It’s become patently obvious that the news media doesn’t just fairly and accurately report the news, but instead promotes a far left, Democrat political agenda.

To be quite honest, the American news media has not fairly and accurately reported the news for many decades.  Most often highlighting anything negative about Republicans, and downplaying or outright not reporting anything negative about Democrats.

Certainly a free press is important to our national discourse, when it is unbiased, and fair and balanced.  But the news media has been aligned with the far left elements of the Democrat Party for a very long time.  When excoriating Republicans and Republican administrations they never tell the whole story.  Often leaving out important facts or context that change the flavor of what they’re reporting on, and putting it in an entirely different light.

When covering up for Democrat politicians they insure that they leave out pertinent facts that might not reflect well on Democrats.  A case in point was the complete lack of reporting on the very radical background and associations of the media’s darling Barack Hussein Obama when he first ran for president, which was downplayed or not even touched on.  Which continues to this day.

CNN and MSNBC, Two of the biggest offenders, regularly through their reporting miscast the achievements of the Trump administration, and present a wholly unreliable and false political narrative.  To the point that absolutely nothing presented to viewers on either network can be viewed with any sense of credibility.

Of course the Democrats in Washington regularly appear as guests and talking heads on both networks since they know that their assertions will never be questioned, and will be accepted and presented as factual truth.  It’s a sad commentary on the state of journalism practiced in our country nowadays.

Just recently CNN personality Jake Tapper spent quite a bit of time downplaying the success of the recent Iranian nuclear mission, only to be soundly contradicted by the guest he brought on to discuss the operation.  It should have been a moment of embarrassment for Tapper, but it wasn’t.  He simply moved on.

Tapper has the distinction of being the one media personality who in his recent book, “Original Sin: President Biden’s Cognitive Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again,” actually gave an honest appraisal of the cognitive abilities of Joe Biden.  AFTER THE FACT!

For four years when it was obvious to any objective person in the news media (are there any left?), as well as to most Americans that Joe Biden was barely functional, and certainly not in charge of the country, Jake Tapper was absent of any criticism.

As with the other Democrat-aligned news media outlets, Joe Biden’s inability to fulfill his oath of office to “defend America against all enemies foreign and domestic” simply wasn’t reported.  Joe Biden was incapable of stringing together two intelligible sentences, much less making critical decisions, yet his so-called ‘gaffes’ were given a free pass.

As more and more comes out about the use of the White House auto-pen to sign official documents under the name of Joe Biden, it’s become abundantly clear that unelected bureaucrats, as well as likely the president’s own family, were making decisions of immense national importance.

Yet where is the news media reporting on the current Republican-led Congressional hearings into this?  They are basically absent.  I can guarantee you that if the hearings were about President Trump we’d be seeing reports 24-7 on President Trump not being capable of holding office. CNN and MSNBC would have a steady stream of medical experts offering their opinion that Trump should be removed.

What happened during the four years that Biden was in office is by far the worst scandal in American political history, but the “mainstream media” is avoiding reporting on it as much as possible, or if they do make mention they are downplaying it as a “nothing-burger”.  Just as they have now done with the recent U.S. mission against the Iranian threat.

The Democrats and their news media allies are openly rooting against America and against any successes by the Trump administration.  Americans deserve better!        



Shock-and-Awe 'Midnight Hammer' Iran Strike Encapsulates Trump Doctrine


My young family and I were in Israel when the Israel Defense Forces and Mossad began their offensive operations against Iran on June 13, commencing what President Donald Trump has since called the "12-Day War." Although the Mossad's intelligence and the IDF's rapid establishment of air superiority inside Iran proved to be nothing less than extraordinary, my wife and I lived on pins and needles for those first few days of the war. We had to be ready day or night, at a moment's notice, to drop everything we were doing, grab our 6-month-old baby, and race to the house's "safe room" (that is, bomb shelter).

Trust me: This is not a fun way to live -- especially not with an infant. Meanwhile, too many of Iran's ballistic missiles -- considerably more lethal than the rockets typically fired into Israel from Hamas and Lebanon -- were evading Israeli air defense. They were finding their targets. Too many homes were being destroyed, and too many people, tragically, were being killed. Though a proud Jew, Zionist and even author of a recent book on the subject, I decided to do what any American father of a beautiful baby girl would do in such a situation: Get us home.

I am a Floridian, and I heard about a program the state of Florida had launched, in partnership with Grey Bull Rescue, to evacuate American citizens from the war zone. We first took a bus to the Jordanian border. We next got to Amman, where we spent the night. We then flew to Cyprus, a hub for those fleeing (and returning to) Israel, where we also spent the night. And finally, we flew from Cyprus to Tampa, where Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis surprised our group by meeting us at the airport. The governor asked me to join him for a press conference; though groggy and sleep-deprived, I of course obliged.

The day after my family got home to Florida, the world changed in an instant: Trump ordered Operation Midnight Hammer, delivering a devastating -- perhaps fatal -- blow to the Iranian regime's three most prized nuclear facilities: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. In his brief remarks at the White House following the strikes, Trump repeatedly linked the national interests and fates of the United States and Israel. Despite months of tendentious leaks, palace intrigue and the often-parroted media reports of a rift between Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, that bilateral relationship is clearly stronger than ever.

Looking back at both the pre-strike debate and the post-strike fallout, the more interesting question -- especially given the hostility toward Trump's move from certain high-profile talking heads within the broader MAGA fold -- is perhaps this: Is Midnight Hammer an aberration from Trump's "America First" foreign policy doctrine, or is it entirely consistent with it?

As the definitive essay on the topic, a 2019 Foreign Policy magazine missive -- appropriately titled "The Trump Doctrine" -- from former Trump administration national security official and current State Department Director of Policy Planning Michael Anton put it, Trump's conception of "America First" means that he has "no inborn inclination to isolationism or interventionism, and he is not simply a dove or a hawk." By contrast, Trump's foreign policy instinct is "Jacksonian": It is a strand of pragmatic conservative realism that is intuitively skeptical, a la George Washington's famous farewell address warning, of involvement overseas but is also able, willing and eager to lash out and strike if necessary to defend core American national interests.

In short, Trump has no interest in reprising the Bush-era moralistic nation-building enterprise, but he also has no interest in burying America's head in the sand and pretending that America simply has no interest in events abroad. It was Trump himself, after all, who both withdrew from former President Barack Obama's flawed nuclear deal with the Iranian terror regime and eliminated ISIS founder Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and former Iranian general Qasem Soleimani, who commanded the Islamic Revolutionary Guards' notorious Quds Force.

There are indeed some fools, ignoramuses and scoundrels on the right who keep trying to mislead their MAGA-friendly audiences by imputing to "America First" views that do not actually put America first and are not held by the president himself. But they are losing that battle: According to a recent CBS News poll, an astounding 94% of self-identified "MAGA" Republicans support Operation Midnight Hammer. It certainly seems that in voting for Trump, these Americans favored stopping the world's No. 1 state sponsor of terrorism -- a regime whose raison d'etre is eliminating the "little Satan" of Israel and the "big Satan" of the United States -- from acquiring the world's most dangerous weapons.

After decades of debate about the Iranian nuclear program and months of pearl-clutching hysteria about the alleged imminence of World War III, the United States has devastated the illicit nuclear weapons program of a terrorist regime that chants "death to America" on a daily basis -- without a single American casualty, without any extended American troop presence on the ground, and with a quick post-strike ceasefire to boot. To achieve a decadeslong-sought foreign policy objective in this fashion is nothing less than astonishing. Operation Midnight Hammer is one of the greatest acts of presidential statesmanship and leadership in modern American history.

It's also "America First" in action. And looking back at the entire ordeal years from now, I strongly suspect it will also make everything my family went through in evacuating the Middle East more than worth it.



🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Protest Is Overrated


For most protests in modern America, the operating assumption is that action from the government will solve the problem.



Another week has passed, which means the street theater geeks have found another foreign flag to parade through the streets of American cities. After the Trump administration authorized a strike on Iranian nuclear facilities, demonstrators waved the Iranian flag. Less than two weeks prior, rioters waved Mexican flags in Los Angeles while burning vehicles under the auspices of protesting against the enforcement of immigration laws.

The outrage du jour changes, but street theater is the M.O. of the anti-Trump resistance. Sometimes the cause is hatred of law enforcement, from local police departments to ICE. Sometimes it involves foreign disputes in the protesters’ home countries, from Palestine to Iran. Two weeks ago, Democrats staged a nationwide day of protest to voice their displeasure with Trump.

Protest theater has also become a favorite pastime of elected Democrats desperate for relevance. Earlier this month, Rep. LaMonica McIver, D-N.J., was charged with “forcibly impeding” federal officers at an ICE detention facility. The day after McIver was indicted, Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., tried to get in on the attention by rushing up to the podium at a press conference given by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem (security restrained him, a development he immediately tried to fundraise off of).

At the height of the riots in L.A., The New York Times published an op-ed expressing support for the riots, blaming Stephen Miller for them, and claiming that “Protest Is Underrated.” The author, David Wallace-Wells, concluded that there are “enduring lessons from political science about what works” and that “those lessons are not exactly … that some amount of violent protest is always counterproductive.” (Buried behind a double negative and three quantitative adverbs, it kind of sounds like he’s extolling the virtue of violent protest, but I digress.)

I don’t know if Wallace-Wells or his editor came up with his headline, but it’s exactly backward. Protest, while not meaningless, is grossly overrated as a useful means of effecting change in a representative republic like the United States.

The right to protest is an important one, though it’s notable that the word “protest” does not appear in the First Amendment, which ensures the right “of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Protest has historically been a powerful tool employed by citizens to register dissent when their government has left them no other recourse. But in a country like America, where we have the freedom to actually participate in self-governing, waving signs in the street is a pretty impotent alternative. The protesters themselves might claim the Trump administration is a fascist, authoritarian dictatorship, but they and their friends just voted for a literal communist in New York City, so do with those accusations what you will.

Most of the “protests” taking place today demand something from the government, whether the demand is to stop enforcing immigration law or to give out more taxpayer-funded freebies. The operating assumption is that the preeminent solution is action from the government, and if the government won’t take the appropriate action on its own, it must be pressured to do so by civil unrest.

Sometimes the people fanning the flames sincerely believe the government can and should solve what they perceive as urgent problems; other times protest is simply a way for privileged liberals to cosplay as freedom fighters and earn back-pats for sticking it to the man. Either way, it’s a lazy cop-out from people who have never done the work of self-governing.

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t want those people running my local school board or civic organizations. But it’s a bad thing for society when people seek to solve their problems by making demands on the government instead of doing something about it themselves. It takes a lot more work to effect real change by investing in your community than it does to order a wrinkled polyester flag on Amazon and carry it around.

The people making actual progress toward a better republic are the ones living and working in their communities, raising families, attending church, starting volunteer organizations, and building relationships. They understand that they and their neighbors are far better equipped to solve social ills than government bureaucrats.

Even when there is merit in petitioning lawmakers for a particular policy objective, those petitions are best accompanied by shoe-leather community work. Pro-lifers may have marched in D.C. to raise awareness for reversing Roe v. Wade, but they did far more through conservative legal organizations and local pregnancy resource clinics.

When French aristocrat Alexis de Tocqueville visited America in the 1830s, he observed a phenomenon in which Americans would solve problems by forming associations among themselves instead of demanding solutions from the government.

If an object blocked traffic on the highway, he observed, “neighbors immediately establish themselves in a deliberating body; from this improvised assembly will issue an executive power that will remedy the ill.” Citizens would have the problem solved “before the idea of an authority preexisting that of those interested has presented itself to anyone’s imagination.”

Americans only appealed to the power of “social authority,” he found, when they had exhausted all other resources. And their associations weren’t limited to political goals; they also gathered to advance causes Tocqueville classified as industrial, intellectual, and moral. These associations, in his mind, were the fruit of the First Amendment’s freedom of assembly.

The local, practical solution of joining with your neighbors to solve problems is less glamorous and more demanding than writing expletives on a piece of posterboard with a Sharpie. In a word, it’s underrated. But it has a far better track record of success. Plus, it has a wonderful side effect: if you invest physically, relationally, financially, and/or spiritually in your community, you’ll find you have a real stake in how your ideas play out in the real world. It might even turn you into a conservative.



Communism Won't Ever Work, Because the Human Species Isn't Built For It


New York socialists think they've won a big victory with Zohran Mamdani's win in the mayoral democrat primary, but it's not exactly a foretelling of things to come. As I wrote in my last VIP piece, Mamdani's win was, like AOC's before him, an isolated event. The man is no blueprint for future victories, it's just an indication that New York's Democrats have gotten simultaneously more ignorant and more radical. 

The thing is, Communism — the ultimate goal of socialism — might sell in those isolated areas, but it's not going much further than that. I predict even New York won't settle for it for long, either. 

The thing is, communism won't work in the U.S. because it can't. We aren't the right species. 

Communism requires things that run completely contrary to human nature, including the complete loss of ego and sacrificing the safety and well-being of the tribe. 

This means that if your family has needs that require more attention, manpower, and resources, then the family members that live on those resources will have to suffer without them, and in cases of medical necessity, die. 

Everything must be rationed including medicine, care, food, water, electricity, and close monitoring of systems is required to maintain the system's integrity and safety. The system is the chief concern in both socialist and communist systems, which means putting an individual before it is grounds for punishment. If you are a burden on the system in any way, you are either punished, abandoned, or eliminated. 

Now, this is a great system to live and work by... if you're an ant. 

Hive species don't have egos, an acute pack mentality, or even an overarching sense of self-preservation. They are born with the wiring to serve the hive to such extreme measures that the self is a tertiary concern. You are to begin working the moment you're able, and die the moment you can't. You will not be mourned. You will simply be replaced. 

Humans don't work like this. 

We are advanced apes with egos, a strong sense of independence, and a driving need to advance the self and the tribe. The "tribe" and the system aren't to be confused. The tribe can take multiple forms, such as a group of peers, friends, but the most common one is family — and the immediate family to be more specific.

Humans will happily sacrifice on behalf of their families, whether it's their time, resources, or their life if need be, but they're not so keen to do that in many other contexts. One could say a patriot is serving the system to the point of willing to give his life up for it, but what he or she is really doing is joining an outfit that becomes its own tribe in order to protect his tribe at home. 

In order to force a person to act against the best interest of his tribe, fear and coercion has to be applied. The threat of harm to the self, especially to his tribe, is usually necessary to obtain his compliance. The threat of that kind of system being implemented over his tribe is enough to send him to war. 

And many wars have been fought to stop that system from taking over various countries for just this reason. No matter how much flowery talk you put on socialism and communism, lethal enforcement is always the inevitable end. It requires continuous compliance that is not realistic to the human species unless it's done so at the end of a gun. In a communist system, protection of the tribe begins to revolve around submission to the system. 

Capitalism works so well and results in such incredible advancements because it works with human nature, allowing the self and the tribe to take center stage. Capitalism seems messy and chaotic, even uncaring, but this is because it's a system that allows each ego to work for the betterment of individual parties all at once, not just one faceless, and cold system. 

Moreover, you're far more likely to produce more for more benefit, allowing you to accumulate resources for yourself and your tribe, whereas all work in a communist system is owned by the system. Even if you work extra hard, you will reap no benefits, thus disincentivizing any desire to work more than you have to, and even encourages you to work less than you actually should since you're getting paid the same anyway. 

Humans cannot operate safely or effectively in a socialist or communist system. Even socialist systems cannot operate in totality without either implementing capitalist standards of economic practice into its system, or outside help from systems that practice some form of capitalism. If they don't, millions of people die, as history has shown us. 

People like AOC, Bernie Sanders, and Mamdani are asking dogs to quack and fish to climb trees. It's not in our nature to be communist or socialist. It is, however, in our nature to be capitalist, and I bet a lot of these so-called socialists and communists would agree the moment you tried to send them to a country that actually practices that kind of stupidity. 



If Trump Doesn’t Reject Judicial Supremacism, His Presidency Is Finished


Just because the judiciary chooses to violate the Constitution does not mean the other branches are required to follow suit.



Since returning to office, President Trump has faced what can only be described as a judicial coup. Through the use of overreaching nationwide injunctions, predominantly Democrat-appointed judges have gleefully granted requests from left-wing activists to block enforcement of the agenda 77 million Americans voted for last year.

Yet, despite this egregious affront to America’s constitutional framework, Trump and his administration are neglecting to stop it.

The latest example of the administration’s refusal to uphold separation of powers is its ongoing battle with a Massachusetts-based federal judge over the president’s deportation of illegal aliens to so-called “third countries.” After District Judge Brian Murphy placed a sweeping injunction blocking the policy’s enforcement, the administration appealed to the Supreme Court, which temporarily stayed the Biden appointee’s order on Monday.

In a stunning act of rebellion against the justices, Murphy — seemingly believing his power usurps that of SCOTUS — issued a separate edict hours after the high court’s ruling in which he declared his initial order “remains in full force and effect.” The judge further claimed, “The District Court’s remedial orders [were] not properly before the [Supreme] Court because the Government has not appealed them, or sought a stay pending a forthcoming appeal.”

So, what did Trump and his administration do?

While U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer correctly characterized Murphy’s power grab as a “lawless act of defiance,” the administration continued to grant the rogue judge’s order legitimacy it doesn’t have. Instead of implementing the president’s policy and telling Murphy to pound sand, team Trump went running back to SCOTUS to ask the justices to “clarify” their Monday stay on the judge’s initial injunction.

But there’s nothing to “clarify.” The high court already spoke on the matter, and there’s no logical or legal reason the administration shouldn’t be executing Trump’s directives — irrespective of what Murphy claims.

Trump and his team’s “strategy,” as it seems, is to continue following the same playbook previously disclosed by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. When asked by Federalist Editor-in-Chief Mollie Hemingway last month about how the administration plans to confront the judicial coup undermining the president’s executive authority, Leavitt said that the game plan is to “comply with the courts’ orders” and “win on the merits of these cases.”

In other words, the administration is going to continue granting the premise that what these rogue judges are doing is lawful and the notion that the judiciary has the final say on matters of law and public policy in America — otherwise known as judicial supremacy.

Except, that’s not the system of government the Founding Fathers had in mind when drafting the Constitution. If anything, framers like Alexander Hamilton viewed the judiciary as the weakest of the three branches, as it lacks the “sword” of the executive and the “purse” of the legislature and relies “upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.”

Contrary to claims made by Chief Justice John Roberts, the courts are not supreme to the other two branches. And just because its members choose to violate the Constitution does not mean the executive and legislative are required to follow suit.

As president, Trump has an obligation to abide by the nation’s founding document. It is he who is granted Article II authority to execute the nation’s laws — not rogue judges seeking to usurp such powers.

As Justice Samuel Alito recently observed, federal matters involving nationwide injunctions “may take two or three years before it could come up” to the Supreme Court to be fully adjudicated. That would mean that by the time cases involving the Trump administration reach the high court for final rulings, Trump’s second term would effectively be over.

The longer Trump continues to play along with leftists’ judicial coup, the longer the votes of those who supported him last year will be rendered meaningless, thus ending a presidency before it could even begin.



New Report on 2024 Shows Trump Built a Coalition the Likes of Which the Republican Party Has Never Seen



He did it. He actually did it. Donald Trump, political upstart, was able to put together a coalition so diverse that the Republican Party of ten years ago would probably do a collective spit take at the thought of blacks, Hispanics, and low-propensity voters showing up at the polls in droves to vote for them. It was always a possibility, of course, but it took Trump to make it a reality.

A new study of the 2024 presidential election by the Pew Research Center shows that's exactly what he did, making significant gains with communities that until very recently hadn't given the GOP a second glance. Given Pew's unique methodology, tracking the voting patterns of a set panel of people over several election cycles, it could be argued that the conclusions they draw in this study are more insightful than, say, exit polling or the post-election surveys typically done by media outlets (think CNN's over-excitable Harry Enten and his trusty, dusty digital numbers board).

One important trend identified is the Trump loyalty factor—he was able to hold onto his base voters, election after election; the same voters showed up for him time and again. They steadfastly stuck with him in 2016, 2020, and again in 2024—that's some serious brand loyalty right there. When you add in the fact that 5 percent of Joe Biden's 2020 voters flipped to Trump in '24, it's clear Trump had staying power and Kamala Harris was one dud of a candidate. 

Blacks, who have voted Democrat since time immemorial, it seems, are proving to be less enchanted with the left these days. In 2024, Trump won 15 percent of black voters, up from 8 percent in 2020. Here's the beauty of the thing: Trump didn't need to win blacks overwhelmingly, he just needed to chip away at the margins in order to secure a victory. In doing that, the Democrats were dealt a serious blow to their long-held belief that they had the black vote secured. 

Hispanics, too, flocked to Trump last year. Trump was so popular with Hispanics that he almost drew even with Harris, with Trump clocking 48 percent of the Hispanic vote to Harris' 51 percent. That's a big jump from 2020, when Trump got 36 percent to Biden's 61 percent. 

Tony Fabrizio, Donald Trump's pollster, remarked that the numbers reflect how well Team Trump was able to execute their campaign strategy.

“We talked about getting Blacks and getting Hispanics and low-propensity voters,” Mr. Fabrizio said in an interview. “Everyone looked at us like we had three heads and we were crazy.”

“This Pew report basically says, ‘Yeah, we did it,’” he added.

The Pew report also seems to strike a serious blow to the myth of the MIA woman voter. If you'll recall, Democrats went into the election convinced that women, in the first presidential election since the overturning of Roe v. Wade, were going to take out their rage at the ballot box. Remember this?

When Pew asked the faction of the study's cohort that opted not to vote in 2024 who they would have voted for, 44 percent said Trump while 40 percent said they would have backed Harris. The study didn't break things down by sex, but these numbers make it clear that Democrats were exceedingly overconfident in the ladies. Looks like Trump got the last cackle on this one.

What's also clear from this study is that Trump has done a great job of teeing up a robust, diverse coalition for the Republican Party going forward, built on his ability to connect with everyday Americans and voice their concerns. And it's a coalition the likes of which the GOP hasn't seen in a long time, if ever. 

The problem for the party, of course, is that Trump is unable to run for another term, despite his occasional cheeky insistence otherwise. It now becomes a question of who in the Republican Party can hold onto, or even expand, this fragile coalition in 2028? 



LaMonica McIver Gives Up the Game in Comments Made After Court Appearance


Sister Toldjah reporting for RedState 

Back in mid-May, the DOJ brought charges against Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) over her alleged role in an incident at the ICE detention center in Newark, with US Attorney Alina Habba announcing that "my office has charged Congresswoman McIver with violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 111(a)(1) for assaulting, impeding and interfering with law enforcement."

Video appeared to show McIver putting her hands on ICE officials in a melee of sorts that occurred on May 9th after she, along with two other New Jersey Democrat members of Congress, as well as Newark's mayor, Ras Baraka, tried to force their way beyond the gates to the center, ostensibly on "oversight" grounds.  Things got extra chippy after Baraka tried to get in through a side entrance, which was was led to the incident.

McIver reacted to Habba's announcement at the time by accusing the DOJ of bringing "purely political" charges against her, saying they were "meant to criminalize and deter legislative oversight." But it still didn't help her escape indictment by a federal grand jury on June 10th.

McIver had a court appearance Wednesday, where she pled "not guilty" and vowed to supporters afterwards that she would not be "intimidated":

 U.S. Rep. LaMonica McIver pleaded not guilty Wednesday to federal charges accusing her of assaulting and interfering with immigration officers outside a New Jersey detention center during a congressional oversight visit at the facility.

“They will not intimidate me. They will not stop me from doing my job,” she said outside the courthouse in Newark after the brief hearing.

But it was the remarks McIver made during an MSDNC interview with Jen Psaki after her court appearance that raised eyebrows, telling Joe Biden's former press secretary that she "never thought I'd be facing charges as a sitting congresswoman":

Unless allegedly assaulting and trying to intimidate and obstruct federal law enforcement officers is part of her job as a member of the House of Representatives, then she most certainly does need to be held accountable in a court of law.

Language warning:


Democrats Plan to Ramp Up ICE Obstruction Visits, Don’t Care if They Get Arrested


Further, here's a timely reminder for Rep. McIver:

Except Democrats, apparently, because it's always (D)ifferent when a Democrat does it. Always.