Wednesday, May 28, 2025

Crushing Academia May Be the Best Thing About Trump 2.0


We should be proud of destroying academia as it is currently constituted. This is one of the greatest achievements of the Trump revolution, perhaps the most important over the long-term, something so critical that it’s taking an inordinate amount of effort from the administration. It’s worth every bit of it. Academia is a poisonous redoubt where people who hate us are pampered and paid for by the tax money of decent Americans. Its purpose is to facilitate ruling class replication and spread its slimy tentacles into every part of our government, culture, and institutions. For too long, academia has succeeded in its Marxist mission. But we’re turning that around.

It’s been remarkably easy. Here’s something that academia doesn’t want you to know. The people involved with it are mostly unbelievably unaccomplished. Sure, there are some brilliant scientists here and there, but they’re not really academics. They’re doing stuff. When we talk about academia, we’re talking about the administrators, the DEI poohbahs, and the humanities faculty that doesn’t produce anything except books full of pinko nonsense. These are distinctly unimpressive people. They’re not geniuses. They’re certainly not plotting in a volcano lair. Academia got power not because of its efforts but because of other social pathologies. Because we got rid of IQ testing and because our high schools went to crap, a college credential became – for a long time – the only way for employers to ensure that an applicant could probably read, that he was not a drooling weirdo, and that he would show up on time wearing clothes. 

Basically, a college diploma now does what a high school diploma should do, except unionized high school teachers are so grossly incompetent that you can’t rely on a kid coming out of high school being able to count past 21 with his pants on. And, of course, once credentials become currency, there was arbitrage – strivers seek the better credential and game the system to do it. That’s why the Ivy Leagues are so popular. It’s not that they’re great schools. I’ve had the pleasure of interviewing Ivy League graduates as a lawyer and am distinctly unimpressed. It’s that they have a brand value disconnected from their objective value, and it’s the brand value that they’re selling. 

But here’s the other thing – like every other institution, the colleges have decided to become political actors and not pursue their proper objective of producing educated citizens ready to take on important jobs in society. They want to turn out little activists. But they never counted on the fact that we would notice this; they assumed brand value would trump objective value, and for a while they were right. But not anymore.

They became convinced of their own superiority because they had invaded the institution and were pretending that the institution was what the institution had been when it earned its reputation. They got high on their own supply. But the rest of us were also sampling their supply, and we were getting repelled by what we were getting. They were providing us with exactly what they wanted to give us, which is a bunch of activists. But activists are only good at things like wrecking society. They’re good at pursuing a Marxist agenda. They are not good at doing actual work. You let a few of them into your company and pretty soon you’re having Maoist struggle sessions about the tyranny of the phallic patriarchy and everybody has pronouns in their email signature blocks. But you won’t have smart people who do a good job.

Bud Light is an example. They went out and got some chick with shiny creds to handle marketing, and she destroyed the brand. She insulted Bud Light drinkers as penis-wielding morons and then decided that what the brand needed was to identify with a perverted male freak who pretended to be a woman. If you’ve met beer drinkers you will see the problem with this strategy. But, of course, she hadn’t. She was of an entirely different class, one that looked down their rhinoplasty-sculpted noses at the hops-loving proles. Want to guess where she went to school? You know the answer. It’s almost too good to be true, but it is true. Yep, she’s a Harvard grad and also went to Wharton.

People in the real world have noticed that the alleged cream of the crop is really the cream of the crap. They’re just not very good at stuff. Some of them are very smart, but they were very smart before they ever got to college. They were smart enough to game the system to get through the admissions process. That is the thing about Harvard. It’s not going to Harvard that matters. It’s getting into Harvard. Once you get into Harvard, you’re done. It’s finished. No one fails. Everybody gets straight A’s. You’re going to walk out with that Harvard diploma, and you’ll be able to impress a declining number of stupid people who are still impressed by diplomas that say “Harvard.” Then you will spend your life dropping your Harvard affiliation thirty seconds into every single conversation you have for the rest of your life. It’s like being a Navy SEAL, except you’re from Cambridge and can’t do a push-up.

These subpar products of academia completely infiltrated our government, corporations, and cultural institutions. The leftists love academia because, through it, the left can self-select our elite. But our elite is not elite. Academia masquerades as an educational enterprise. In reality, colleges are just a collection of forward operating bases in the culture war. And we’re tired of it. We’re tired of subsidizing them to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars, especially when a third of their students are anti-American foreigners who come here to figuratively defecate on our country while taking full advantage of its largesse.  

In a parallel development, tech is disrupting academia’s cushy scam. It’s not just that students can AI their assignments. It’s that AI makes universities redundant. The idea of hundreds of people sitting in a large auditorium, listening to some professor drone on and on, is a 20th-century notion. It’s now the 21st century. Online learning doesn’t have the intimacy of sharing a giant lecture hall with 500 of your closest friends while you flick through your phone as the non-binary weirdo at the front of the hall up-talks on and on about indigenous trans decolonialization. But, for someone who wants to learn, it can teach cheap and fast. 

That’s another thing. Academia has priced itself out of existence. You can easily spend $100,000 a year at one of these Ivy League schools. A lot of that is subsidized by taxpayers, but not for long. Normal Americans are now aware that normal Americans can’t get in, and that colleges are actively anti-white, anti-Asian, and anti-Jewish. You can get in only if you have some special something that ignites a tingle up the leg of the admissions officer – and every admissions officer is a Democrat woman on SSRIs. Maybe you don’t know what gender you are. Maybe your great-great-great-great-grandfather came from Uganda. Perhaps you’re some sort of communist punk. The regular Americans understand that this gateway to success (allegedly) is closed to them. And they’re tired of paying for it.

Academia is all out of friends on the right. There was a time when a Republican could stand up for colleges and not be crushed by the movement, but that time is long gone. It’s our enemy. We should make an example of it. And as we do that, there’s an immeasurable benefit to be had. We’ll get the left out of the business of choosing America’s elite.



X22, And we Know, and more- May 28

 



Grading for Equity coming to San Francisco high schools this fall

 

District materials highlight a decrease in A grades for ‘more privileged’ students.

Were it not for an intrepid school board member, the drastic change in grading with implications for college admissions and career readiness would have gone unnoticed and unexplained. It is buried in a three-word phrase on the last page of a PowerPoint presentation embedded in the school board meeting’s 25-page agenda. The plan comes during the last week of the spring semester while parents are assessing the impact of over $100 million in budget reductions and deciding whether to remain in the public schools this fall. While the school district acknowledges that parent aversion to this grading approach is typically high and understands the need for “vigilant communication,” outreach to parents has been minimal and may be nonexistent. The school district’s Office of Equity homepage does not mention it and a page containing the SFUSD definition of equity has not been updated in almost three years.  

Grading for Equity eliminates homework or weekly tests from being counted in a student’s final semester grade. All that matters is how the student scores on a final examination, which can be taken multiple times. Students can be late turning in an assignment or showing up to class or not showing up at all without it affecting their academic grade. Currently, a student needs a 90 for an A and at least 61 for a D. Under the San Leandro Unified School District’s grading for equity system touted by the San Francisco Unified School District and its consultant, a student with a score as low as 80 can attain an A and as low as 21 can pass with a D.  

Joe Feldman, the consultant the school district plans to contract with to implement Grading for Equity, wrote in 2019 that in Placer County, another jurisdiction with the grading system, “students who did not qualify for free or reduced-price lunch had a sharper decrease in A’s, reflecting how traditional grading practices disproportionately benefit students with resources because of the inequitable inclusion of extra credit and other resource-dependent grading criteria.”   

Grading for Equity may reduce A and D/F grades and, according to Feldman, enable a school district to cut costs for remedial classes but what about student academic outcomes? The most recent data from both middle schools in San Leandro where grading reform started in 2016 document significant continued disparities among student populations when it comes to performance on statewide assessment tests. In both English and mathematics, the gaps ranged from twice to triple to even four times as many students meeting or exceeding the statewide standard in some subgroups compared to others. The children needing the most help and improvement are not getting it.

The school district has long expressed its commitment to teaching “the whole child.” Grading for Equity de-emphasizes the importance of timely performance, completion of assignments, and consistent attendance. These are all elements essential for students to be college and career ready when they graduate.  

Grading for Equity de-emphasizes the importance of timely performance, completion of assignments, and consistent attendance.

Grading for Equity also contradicts one of the Superintendent’s responsibilities (what the school district calls “guardrails”) “not [to] allow curriculum and instruction that is not rooted in excellence. . . .” While teachers will have a choice to utilize Grading for Equity this fall, students and parents may not. Even if students transfer to a classroom with a traditional grading system, they cannot escape the impact the experiment will have on class ranking, scholarship access, daily study habits or assignments. For teachers, one of the school district’s interim goals is to set a target for students to get a C grade or higher in the new system. That should be easier under Grading for Equity because the system lowers the threshold for a C grade. But will the student learn more or be more ready for college and career?  

A larger question is whether advancing Grading for Equity represents a shift back toward policies such as ending eighth-grade algebra and Lowell High School academic admissions. School board members responsible for those policies were recalled. Superintendent Su is owning this policy as her staff has informed the school board it has no formal authority to accept or reject it. Parents and students have suffered mightily through all the school district changes over the past few years while voters as a whole have invested heavily in bond and ballot measures to help the schools. Such a drastic and dramatic change in the high school grading system merits greater attention and scrutiny than given by the school district up to now.  

China’s Covert Pursuit of Global Dominance


China’s global ambitions are rooted in the allure of an ancient concept for the Chinese people—the Middle Kingdom, envisioning China as a divinely appointed ruling nation that is central and superior to others. In the Art of War, Sun Tzu crystallized this idea into the ideal of a benevolent Chinese emperor conquering the entire world—Tianxia, or All-Under-Heaven—without violence or destruction.

But trust the communists to twist the very antithesis of Marxism — a God-based, imperialistic idea — to serve their own designs. Xi Jinping, general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), positions himself as central to a Chinese world order “that will surpass and supplant the Westphalian system” by 2049. Therefore, his actions must be viewed in light of Tianxia.

A year after he came to power in 2012, he launched the Belt and Road Initiative(BRI), an ambitious investment in infrastructure aimed at connecting East Asia and Europe. This initiative has since expanded to Africa, Oceania, and Latin America. The BRI must be recognized for what it is: a covert, long-term operation for military expansion and strategic presence.

Through BRI’s extensive loans and assistance in building ports and highways, China has gained significant economic and political influence in nearly 150 of the 193 U.N. member countries. The U.S. and its allies must prepare for China transforming such vast influence into military advantages, as it has already done in many areas. In confronting the dragon, we must remain wary of its winding tail.

China’s influence-mongering is ideology-agnostic. If a country aligns with China’s strategy to displace the U.S. as a global power, the type of regime—whether fascist, authoritarian, Islamist, or communist—matters little. In fact, writes Col. John Mills (Ret.), China has primarily partnered with countries where regimes are insecure and individual rights are non-existent—much like in China.

He claims that Russia, North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Cuba, Pakistan, and South Africa are all now “de facto colonies of China.” At the same time, he points out that China aims to dominate the U.N. and other international organizations. In this struggle, he argues that the efforts of those advocating for a free world have been undermined by globalist elites who pander to China when it benefits them.

China’s strategic activities in Africa and the Middle East over the last two and a half decades serve as a case study of how the dragon operates. The advantages China has gained now threaten U.S. interests in the Horn of Africa, which includes Somalia, Djibouti, Ethiopia, and Eritrea, and provides significant control over the Gulf of Aden, the Red Sea, and the Indian Ocean.

What began as ideological support for African countries seeking independence in the 1950s and 1960s gradually evolved into infrastructure projects, notably the construction of the Tanzania-Zambia railway in the 1970s. More significant engagement commenced in 2000. By 2009, China had emerged as Africa’s top trading partner; by 2023, China had overtaken the U.S. in trade with 52 of the 54 African countries.

Chinese ventures into the Horn of Africa began in 2017 with the establishment of a military base in Djibouti, a country through which one-third of global shipping passes on its way to the Suez Canal. The U.S., Japan, Saudi Arabia, and France also maintain bases in the area. China uses its base to resupply naval forces in the Gulf of Aden, evacuate personnel, and conduct exercises alongside Russia and Iran.

When the Houthi attacks in the Red Sea began in October 2023, in support of Hamas’s assault on Israel, resulting in a 75% decline in international shipping, the U.S. aimed to neutralize the missile and drone strikes and retaliate against the Yemen-based attackers from Djibouti. However, the country denied permission, reportedly due to Chinese influence.

According to State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce, Chang Guang, a CCP-linked satellite tech company, “is directly supporting Iran-backed Houthi terrorist attacks on U.S. interests.” This may indicate that the company is providing satellite imagery and bearings to assist the Houthis in targeting merchant and naval ships in the Red Sea.

What is alarming is that China has even established deep ties with Egypt, a U.S. ally. Recently, China and Egypt conducted a joint air force drill — “Eagles of Civilization 2025” — in which China’s latest multirole fighter jets, refuelers, and early-warning aircraft participated. Clearly, American influence in Egypt is waning while Chinese influence is gaining strength.

An opinion piece in the Daily News Egypt captured the mood in the country, asserting that the U.S. has been committed to allowing Israel to maintain military supremacy, which has enabled it to dictate for decades what weapons Egypt may possess and how it may defend itself. The drills with China, it noted, represented a declaration of sovereignty, of no longer being “a second-tier ally in its own region.”

The Jerusalem Post notes that Egypt’s outreach to Iran, its silence on Hamas, and the increase in weapons smuggling by drones into Sinai suggest that Cairo is distancing itself from the U.S. This poses a danger to Israel. Caches of recently manufactured Chinese weapons were discovered in Hamas tunnels along Israel’s border with Egypt.

It appears that the U.S. may be losing its grip on the Suez Canal. Following China’s “unrestricted warfare” strategy, a Chinese-led international consortium is developing a container terminal at the Egyptian port of Ain Sokhna on the Red Sea, which is set to begin operations this year. The company also manages the Alexandria and El Dhekelia ports. Furthermore, a Chinese steel company is planning to establish an industrial complex in the area. The CCP cannot be far behind.

China has also built relations with Iran, whose global Hezbollah and Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps networks could be advantageous for espionage and sabotage. This cooperation arose from a 25-year agreement to purchase large quantities of Iranian oil at a substantial discount. In exchange, China will invest $400 billion in Iran.

This is already affecting Israel directly: Chinese military engineers have assisted Iran-backed Hamas in constructing their tunnel networks beneath Gaza; Chinese equipment has been discovered within them, and the CCP has hosted the Hamas and Al Fatah leadership in Beijing.

Qatar and Turkey are vital to Chinas interests in the Gulf, where India, perceived by China as an enemy, wields considerable influence. The Abraham Accords — whereby Israel, the UAE, Bahrain, and Sudan have agreed to normalize relations — are regarded as a threat by both China and Iran. Consequently, China is leveraging Qatar and Turkey’s eagerness to establish ties with it to extend the BRI into the Gulf. Meanwhile, it employs Turkey to encourage Pakistan to escalate tensions with India.

To its south, China has consistently made intrusive forays into Indian, Nepalese, and Bhutanese territory. During the recent Indo-Pakistan crisis, China aligned itself with Pakistan. It has further provoked India by assisting Bangladesh in reviving a World War II-era airstrip near India’s Chicken’s Neck corridor, which is now vulnerable to being cut off from both the north and the south.

All this may seem like a tedious list of places where China has steadily—though mostly without direct conflict—gained advantages. However, it must be viewed through a defining framework of Chinese strategic thinking: the game of weiqi, which clearly illustrates this process. When the time is right, the entire board will yield to the patient, superior player with the placement of a single stone in a remote corner.

As Kenneth Fan, who ran a consulting firm in China for over 20 years and was consulted by one of Xi’s strategy advisers, warned in 2023: with the dragon, and especially with Xi, it’s never about Taiwan, or Pakistan, or Iran, or any other country. It is always about world domination. It is always about Tianxia.



Trump Whacks the Deep State


Last Friday, the Trump Administration notified many employees of the National Security Council (NSC) that they were being dismissed, as its bloated staff of 395 is being chopped in half. This downsizing is long overdue, and the need for reductions at the NSC is recognized by even the liberal media.

However, some employees had already left work early for the weekend, so they did not initially see these notices. This illustrates again the general lack of productivity in D.C. and how government employees there pay more attention to the media than to their jobs.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has been the National Security Advisor since May 1, has urged Trump to take control over the career government workers in D.C., and Trump is doing that. “What you’ve committed to do on Cuba, what you want to do on Cuba, is never going to come from career staff,” Rubio advised Trump.

“It’s going to have to come from the top down. You're going to have to tell them what to do,” Rubio added. Rubio holds the same position that Henry Kissinger held during the Nixon Administration, when Kissinger met multiple times every day with President Nixon.

A White House official observed that “the NSC is the ultimate Deep State. It’s Marco vs. the Deep State.” In support of this downsizing of the NSC, the White House official stated further that “we’re gutting the Deep State.”

An example was Ukrainian-born (then the USSR) Alexander Vindman and his twin brother Eugene, who were in key positions on the NSC during the first Trump Administration. Eugene complained about Trump’s perfect conversation with Zelensky and his brother, Alexander, then testified against Trump during the first impeachment hearings.

Now Eugene is a newly elected Democrat congressman in Virginia, while Alexander is reportedly considering a run as a Democrat for the U.S. Senate seat held by Republican Ashley Moody in Florida.

During the Revolutionary War in 1777, General Washington reportedly commanded, “Put none but Americans on guard tonight.” Historians clarify that Washington’s actual quote was this: “You will therefore send me none but Natives, and Men of some property, if you have them.”

Trump should have staff who are supportive and loyal to him working in his administration, as President Ronald Reagan did. California Supreme Court Justice William P. Clark turned down an opportunity to be appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court to help Reagan win the Cold War as his National Security Advisor. 

But the Cold War has been over for more than a quarter-century, and the NSC has been a failure under Democrat Administrations by not keeping us out of war. Within weeks of Trump taking office, the NSC orchestrated a bombing attack that Vice President JD Vance properly opposed.

Vance explained in early March that only 3% of American trade flows through the Suez Canal, while 40% of European trade does. It was not in America’s interest to bomb anyone there, but the NSC refused to listen to Vance and instead approved an attack on the Houthis.

New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof wryly shouted in a column headline, “The $7 Billion We Wasted Bombing a Country We Couldn’t Find on a Map.” We lost not one but two F/A 18 Super Hornet fighter jets, each costing $67 million, one of which literally fell off its carrier, the USS Harry S. Truman.

Mike Waltz was initially appointed as National Security Advisor, but quickly, MAGA grassroots howled in protest over placing a neocon in this key role. On May 1, Trump astutely reassigned Waltz to be Ambassador to the United Nations, where he cannot entangle America in foreign wars.

The NSC is the nerve center of the resistance in D.C. to conservative leadership. President Reagan wisely downgraded the NSC to force it to report to his Chief of Staff, rather than allow it to continue as though it ranked above everyone else, including the president.

Trump could shut down the NSC entirely, and nothing would be missed. The Deep State no longer protects Americans against foreign enemies, but instead protects the bureaucracy against the will of the American People.

Trump’s bold action to fire most of the NSC staff comes at the same time that Elon Musk has announced his quiet exit from the political stage. Musk declared earlier this month that he has already given enough toward elections and plans to focus more on his businesses instead.

This creates a void, and politics abhors a vacuum. Musk effectively framed the debate around the need to downsize the federal government, including firing thousands of employees. He was instrumental in blocking overregulation by a new requirement that 30 million Americans register their private information with the Treasury Department’s FinCEN. 



🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


The Biggest Indicator That Many Men Are Just Done With Modern Day Society


There have been rumblings about men moving into more traditional church scenes over the past year, and apparently, the news hasn't just been underreported; it's actually become a bit more serious. These men aren't just trying to find God in a way that doesn't involve "Jesus is my boyfriend" music that looks like a Jonas Brothers stage show; they're trying to sink into a lifestyle that rejects a lot of post-modern thinking. 

As first reported by the BBC, a sharp uptick of men have been attending a Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia (or ROCOR) in Georgetown, Texas, led by Father Moses McPherson. 

According to McPherson, ROCOR has been gaining a lot of traction with men due to its traditional ideas: 

ROCOR, a global network with headquarters in New York, has recently been expanding across parts of the US - mainly as a result of people converting from other faiths.

In the last six months, Father Moses has prepared 75 new followers for baptism in his church of the Mother of God, just north of Austin.

"When my wife and I converted 20 years ago we used to call Orthodoxy the best-kept secret, because people just didn't know what it was," he says.

"But in the past year-and-a-half our congregation has tripled in size."

These traditional ideas go beyond just typical beliefs, but involve changing entire lifestyles. This includes homeschooling and traditional practices when it comes to gender roles. 

And according to the numbers, this faith is seeing rapid growth: 

The true increase in the number of converts is hard to quantify, but data from the Pew Research Centre suggests Orthodox Christians are 64% male, up from 46% in 2007.

smaller study of 773 converts appears to back the trend. Most recent newcomers are men, and many say the pandemic pushed them to seek a new faith. That survey is from the Orthodox Church in America (OCA), which was established by Russian monks in Alaska in the late 18th Century and now has more than 700 parishes, missions, communities, monasteries, and institutions in the US, Canada and Mexico which identify as Russian Orthodox.

After watching McPherson's YouTube channel for a bit, I can see why many people would gravitate toward him, especially men. McPherson seems to reject modernist takes on gender roles and encourages young people to get married, settle down, and have children. In one short, he holds up a pregnancy test and encourages couples to get a positive one. He also calls masturbation "pathetic and unmanly".

A lot of McPherson's positions seem to be blunt, unwavering, and unapologetic, and I think that's what is attracting a lot of men right now. They feel like they can be proud of their masculinity in the way that God sees it, and this ROCOR growth seems to show that men aren't just seeking that kind of welcome; they want to foster it and find fellowship in that kind of scene. 

Modern society makes it clear that masculinity is unwelcome and distasteful, and men are often made out to be the bad guy no matter what the scenario entails, yet at this faith, men are held in higher esteem. They're obviously still held highly accountable for their actions, but this accountability comes with love and encouragement, not blame and derision. 

Obviously, this is going to have some political issues attached to it. As the BBC reports, the church's Russian origin is a factor in how it's viewed by many: 

The head of the Russian Church in Moscow, Patriarch Kirill, has doggedly backed the invasion of Ukraine, calling it a Holy War, and expressing little compassion for its victims. When I ask Archpriest Father John Whiteford about Russia's top cleric, who many see as a warmonger, he assures me the Patriarch's words have been distorted.

But it appears that some see Russia as the last bastion of real Christianity, and that potentially, ROCORs are a path to seeing Russia in a far more friendly light. 

At its core, however, appears to be a real need for men to escape modern ideals which encourage women to be loose and disrespect their own bodies, for men to be passive and feel guilt for simply being men, to eliminate gender differences entirely, and that LGBT inclusion is a norm, not a fringe. It even pushes this on children. 

And this orthodoxy seems to give many men a stability they see lacking in mainstream society. 

It's unclear if this will spread, but given the recent uptick and society continuously trying to push one new fresh hell on the people after another, I can see this popularity continuing to rise. 



Patrick Bet David Gives Solid P Diddy Recap



CTH doesn’t follow the perverse Hollywood or entertainment industry debauchery much, there’s just a lot of evil inside the connections and factually it’s sick.  The world of DC politics is filthy enough, we don’t need the sexual perversions of Hollywood and the music industry in our review cycle.

That said, I was sent this really good recap of the Sean Combs case by someone and Patrick Bet David gives a great 20-minute fact-filled summary of both the background and the current case.  I found it interesting because PBD starts with the money aspect, then weaves the timeline while remaining focused on the money dynamic.  It is well worth 20 minutes, and you will likely hear some things within his research notes you may not have known before.  WATCH:



NPR Is Under The Delusion It Has A Constitutional Right To Your Money

Despite NPR’s claim that it ‘ensures the integrity and high standards of its journalism through multiple, rigorous safeguards,’ the outlet has a well-documented history of pushing a leftist agenda.



NPR filed a delusional lawsuit on Tuesday against the Trump administration, arguing that it has a constitutional right to your hard-earned money.

The suit, brought by NPR and three Colorado-based public radio stations, alleges that Trump’s executive order cutting federal funding to the left-wing NPR and PBS violates their right to free speech, as well as provisions of the Public Broadcasting Act.

“The [Executive] Order’s objectives could not be clearer: the Order aims to punish NPR for the content of news and other programming the President dislikes and chill the free exercise of First Amendment rights by NPR and individual public radios across the country,” the suit states.

But as Texas Rep. Brandon Gill countered in a post on X: “NPR has a right to free speech. It doesn’t have a right to our tax dollars.”

Trump issued an executive order earlier this month directing the Corporation for Public Broadcasting to “cease federal funding” to NPR and PBS.

“Americans have the right to expect that if their tax dollars fund public broadcasting at all, they fund only fair, accurate, unbiased, and nonpartisan news coverage,” the order stated, with the White House adding that PBS and NPR “receive millions from taxpayers to spread radical, woke propaganda disguised as ‘news.’”

“No media outlet has a constitutional right to taxpayer subsidies, and the Government is entitled to determine which categories of activities to subsidize,” the order continues.

But NPR argues that it does have a right to your hard-earned dollars.

The suit argues the order is unconstitutional and violates the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967. That law established the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) to “‘facilitate the full development of public telecommunications in which programs of high quality’ and ‘creativity’ will be ‘obtained by diverse sources’” among other things. As stated in NPR’s lawsuit, the act explains “how the Corporation must allocate its general appropriation from Congress.” Twenty-five percent of the appropriation goes toward public radio, while 75 percent goes to public television.

According to the suit, “Congress has appropriated $535 million in general funding for the Corporation for Fiscal Years 2025, 2026, and 2027,” while NPR, in fiscal year 2024, spent roughly $11.1 million in total in grants from the CBP.

Trump “is exercising his lawful authority to limit funding to NPR and PBS,” White House spokesman Harrison Fields said in a statement. “The President was elected with a mandate to ensure efficient use of taxpayer dollars, and he will continue to use his lawful authority to achieve that objective.”

Despite NPR’s claim that it “ensures the integrity and high standards of its journalism through multiple, rigorous safeguards,” the outlet has a well-documented history of pushing a leftist agenda.

Notably, NPR refused to cover the Hunter Biden laptop scandal in the lead-up to the 2020 election.

“We don’t want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories, and we don’t want to waste the listeners’ and readers’ time on stories that are just pure distractions,” NPR Managing Editor for News Terence Samuel said in a statement back in October 2020. A newsletter published by NPR Public Editor Kelly McBride claimed that “there are many, many red flags in that New York Post investigation.”

As The Federalist’s Assignment Editor Elle Purnell noted, NPR “falsely claimed demonstrators outside the White House were tear-gassed by U.S. Park Police” in June 2020. “Park Police Tear Gas Peaceful Protesters To Clear Way For Trump Church Photo-Op,” one NPR headline stated. A Twitter post from NPR Politics similarly claimed: “Police in Washington, D.C. used tear gas and rubber bullets on peaceful protesters to clear them away from St. John’s Church, which suffered a small fire.” (The “small fire” was apparently an act of arson.) 

But the supposedly “peaceful” protesters actually threw “projectiles including bricks, frozen water bottles and caustic liquids,” according to acting Park Police Chief Gregory T. Monahan. Monahan also stated Park Police did not use tear gas but rather smoke canisters — which, as noted by Purnell, “lack the irritant used in tear gas.” 

In addition, NPR portrayed the Declaration of Independence as “offensive” on multiple occasions. “This story quotes the U.S. Declaration of Independence — a document that contains offensive language about Native Americans, including a racial slur,” read a July 8, 2022, “Editor’s note.”

NPR also apologized for calling illegal aliens “illegal.” “Sorry, that was a mistake,” NPR said, referencing a deleted tweet. “NPR’s policy is not to characterize people as ‘illegal.’ We slip up from time to time, but we’ll keep working hard to get it right.”

The idea that NPR is entitled — via the Constitution — to your bank account is risible and delusional.



Israel PM says Hamas's Gaza chief Mohammed Sinwar has been killed

 

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says its military has "eliminated" Hamas's Gaza chief Mohammed Sinwar, one of its most wanted men and the brother of the group's late leader Yahya Sinwar.

Mohammed Sinwar was the target of a massive Israeli strike on the courtyard and surrounding area of the European hospital in the southern city of Khan Younis on 13 May, which the Israeli military said destroyed Hamas's "underground infrastructure" there.

Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry said at the time that 28 people were killed. Hamas itself has neither confirmed nor denied Sinwar's death.

Yahya Sinwar, mastermind of the 7 October 2023 attack on Israel, was killed by Israeli troops last October.

Israel launched a military campaign in Gaza in response Hamas' cross-border attack 600 days ago, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage.

At least 54,084 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's health ministry.   


https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c79e72vz70no