Tuesday, May 27, 2025

Melania makes her presence known from the shadows


First Lady Melania Trump has not been very visible in this second term of her husband’s presidency. In part, she wants to be close to her son, Barron, who is attending university in New York (although I suspect he does quite well on his own). But Melania has likely tired of the attacks and abuse she suffered in the president’s first term that were unrelenting and petty. I’m not surprised that she is less than enthusiastic about appearing in public at this time.

Fortunately, she has resurrected her first term program, Be Best. In January, Mrs. Trump explained that she had difficulty getting support for Be Best in the first term, receiving the usual petty criticisms and skepticism from the media. But she plans nevertheless to expand the program:

‘I will continue with Be Best and also I will expand Be Best,’ Trump said in a Monday interview on ‘Fox & Friends.’

‘In the first administration, I didn’t have much support from anyone,’ Trump told Fox News’s Ainsley Earhardt.

‘I invited all of the streaming platforms to the White House. I had the roundtable. And I didn’t have much support from them,’ she said. 

‘Imagine what we could do in those years if they will rally behind me, and teach the children and do protect them about the social media and their mental health?’ she added.

In addition, she received funding for a new and exciting program for our youth, called Foster Youth to Independence (FYI):

‘I am proud to have successfully secured $25 million to provide housing for individuals aging out of foster care.  This is another essential measure that ensures the safety, welfare, and autonomy of those in the foster community,’ commented First Lady Melania Trump.

[snip]

The FYI program, led by HUD and supported by public housing authorities across the country, offers housing assistance to eligible individuals under the age of 25 who are transitioning out of foster care. The program is designed to prevent homelessness and provide a foundation for young adults to pursue education, employment, and long-term independence.

According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, more than 20,000 young people transition out of foster care each year. A significant percentage of these youth face housing insecurity or homelessness. This support provides an essential safety net during a pivotal time in a young person’s life.

Often, these young people find their way to drugs, prostitution, and homelessness. There has been little help, either emotionally or financially, for these youth once they turn 18 and leave their foster homes:

About half will get a high school diploma or GED, and less than 3% will earn any type of degree. As you can imagine, that leads to difficulties becoming and staying employed. By age 21, only about 56% young people who aged out of the system have full or even part-time jobs. Those who do [find jobs] do not make a living wage. By age 24, only half will have gainful employment. 

And while those numbers are all troubling, here’s the one that bothered me the most: girls who age out of the foster care system are 80% more likely to become involved in sex trafficking. Foster care is also often called the ‘pipeline to prostitution.’  Around 60% of youth involved in sex trafficking have a history that includes the foster care system.

Although the foster care system is a noble goal and can be a valuable resource for these kids when they are rejected, abused, or abandoned by their birth families, they need more help to find their place in this world once they are out on their own.

We have watched other young people, who are far more privileged, reject their blessed circumstances and abandon any code of human decency. We’ve watched them attack other students on campus, particularly Jews, as they demonstrate their lack of humanity and common sense.

Let’s consider that there could be at least one group of young people that will be offered the means to live a normal life, a roof over their heads, and resources for finding productive outcomes, education, and jobs.

Congratulations, Melania. We’re glad to have you back.



X22, And we Know, and more- May 27

 



"Something BIG is Coming — And It Can’t Be Stopped... | Victor Davis Hanson...

Trump confronted China. Europe cashed in. While the U.S. tried to stop Beijing’s theft, dumping, and espionage, Europe smiled and sold them Airbuses. Victor Davis Hanson lays it bare: the EU wasn’t an ally — it was a parasite, pocketing profits while sabotaging the fight. The global game was rigged — and Trump flipped the board. He lined up deals with India, Japan, South Korea, even China. But Europe? Dead last. Why? Because they don’t make decisions — they take orders from the American Left. If helping Trump meant stability, they’d rather risk collapse. Wall Street howled. The media lied. When tariffs hit, the headlines screamed “recession.” But GDP rose. Jobs surged. Inflation cooled. Why the panic? Because America’s richest 7% saw their paper gains dip from an artificial high — and they threw a tantrum. To them, a 10% correction was the apocalypse. For everyone else, it was irrelevant. Elites cried over markets. The working class cried over gas. Hanson reminds us: the ruling class doesn’t feel what real Americans feel. They obsess over stock indexes; regular people talk about food, fuel, and rent. Trump shattered that disconnect — and they’ve hated him ever since. This wasn’t economic policy — it was a class insurrection. And the global elite, from Brussels to Wall Street, never forgave the man who dared to side with the people.


Celebrate the Dems Drowning in the Political Abyss, but Don't Get Too Drunk


Yes, you can have a few drinks to celebrate the Democratic Party’s destruction. When the left has to spend $20 million on how to speak to American male voters, you know they’ve bottomed out. They don’t know what people think. The Obama era was supposed to be the end of conservatism; it wasn’t. We’ll get back to that in a second, but while we should celebrate liberal America being incapable of beating us right now, we can’t get too drunk.

The reason is that in 2010, just two years after Barry's grand arrival to the White House, the Tea Party wave crashed into Washington, DC. The Democratic Party's atrophy began under Obama, who didn’t do much to strengthen state parties. It’s not “sexy” work, but it’s where you keep your candidate bench healthy. Instead, the GOP reached levels of political power at the state, federal, and local levels not seen since the 1930s. 

White working-class voters were ours. Now, it’s non-white working-class voters and heavy swaths of the Latino vote. With Black men and Asians—Donald J. Trump has been transformative and a force for the better in Republican politics—Trump was able to take the Obama coalition away from liberals. Mitt Romney, John McCain, and other traditional Republicans could have never done this. The Rust Belt and the Blue Wall were in play when Trump was on the ticket. 

That’s not the case for the old-school, and now dead, GOP establishment. Trump came in and obliterated them. Those anti-Trump Republicans who still fret over personality still don’t get it, and it’s sad: we have a multi-racial working-class party that’s unbeatable, but they can’t see the forest for the trees. What is annoying is that the GOP remains the most significant obstacle to legislative success on the Hill. 

The Democrats are leaderless and without an appealing agenda. Yes, some know what the problems are and the tough discussions ahead, but this voter base is content with whining, ranting, and not having those discussions, a symptom of the left's sense of gross entitlement. This is the window the GOP must exploit. Democrats are still seething over Trump getting the best of them in two of the past three elections. 

For now, our political opposition is in a terrible state of disarray. Their communications have collapsed, their base is too small to win elections, and their insatiable desire to attack and talk down to those with whom they disagree will forever hamstring their efforts at rebuilding. Yet, as with anything, a lot can change during midterms. We can’t bank on Democrats being lost in the wilderness forever. 

Enjoy the moment, but don’t get blacked out. We have work to do.



Argentina, HHS announce plans to create WHO alternative after leaving organization

 

The announcement comes as both countries prepare to leave the global health alliance, and after the WHO adopted the first ever pandemic treaty, which says its aim is to help the world better respond to future health crises.

Why Men Must Abandon The False Gospel Of Nice-Guyism


The core problem is that nice guys’ self-sacrifice is rooted in a falsehood. It’s not motivated by strength or obedience to God 
— it’s motivated by insecurity and fear.



For years, I’ve watched men in the Church try to gain respect by being nice and fail miserably. They serve, they sacrifice, they bend over backward to please everyone around them, especially their wives. But it doesn’t lead to the life they expected.

Instead of respect, they get resentment. Instead of admiration, they get indifference. They’re overlooked, not honored. Their efforts go unnoticed, their sacrifices unappreciated. These are the so-called “nice guys.” And understanding what drives them is key to understanding why so many Christian men feel lost, ineffective, and ashamed.

One of the most helpful frameworks I’ve come across for diagnosing this is Robert Glover’s No More Mr. Nice Guy. While it wasn’t written for a Christian audience, it’s clear-eyed about what’s going on in men’s lives. Glover describes what he calls “Nice Guy Syndrome,” a way of living where a man believes: If I’m good, people will love me, meet my needs, and life will go smoothly. It’s a covert contract — one that only exists in his mind, and one that no one else agreed to.

This leads him to perform. He tries to be what he thinks others want. He hides anything unpleasant. He avoids conflict. He anticipates needs without being asked, expecting others to do the same for him. He believes that if he does everything right, life will finally work. He’ll get the girl. He’ll earn the respect. He’ll find peace.

But none of that happens. And so he becomes bitter.

This kind of man is everywhere in the Church. He often becomes a servant-leader in the worst possible sense: deferential, passive, afraid to take initiative. He thinks leadership means laying down, not laying hold. He gives and gives, but it’s not a gift — it’s a transaction. He hopes his sacrifice will be repaid. When it’s not, he doesn’t just feel exhausted. He feels betrayed.

Nice guys don’t serve out of strength. They serve out of emptiness. They’re trying to earn what they believe they lack: approval, affection, significance. Glover traces this to what he calls “toxic shame” — not the conviction of sin, but the belief that being a man is itself wrong. That masculinity itself is inherently corrupt and dangerous.

This belief didn’t come from nowhere. For decades now, we’ve been raising boys to despise their nature. We tell them to sit still, speak softly, be sensitive, suppress aggression, and emote more. In short, we train them to be more like girls. Gloria Steinem famously said we should “raise our sons more like our daughters” — and the culture obeyed.

Nowhere is this more obvious than in public education, where for 13 formative years, boys are immersed in a system designed by women, staffed mostly by women, and optimized for girls. Masculine traits — risk-taking, roughhousing, competitiveness — are pathologized. Boys learn early that their instincts are bad, that manhood is a problem, that strength must be tamed. They carry that shame into adulthood.

And many of them find their way into churches where male virtue is modeled after a distorted picture of Jesus — one that emphasizes meekness and mildness while stripping them of their true strength. In this version, meekness becomes passivity, and kindness becomes niceness. But the real Jesus was meek and mighty, kind and commanding — full of grace and truth, not neutered of initiative, boldness, or authority.

So they try harder. They try to be nice. They volunteer more. They “lead” by constantly deferring to their wives. They think sanctification requires the death of their masculinity, rather than the sanctification of it.

But sacrifice is part of masculinity — you sacrifice for your mission, for your people, for your God. What you don’t sacrifice is masculinity itself. They think being a good Christian means being a doormat with a Bible verse. And it doesn’t work.

The core problem is that their self-sacrifice is rooted in a falsehood. It’s not motivated by strength or obedience to God — it’s motivated by insecurity and fear. It’s a performance designed to win approval, and that kind of sacrifice always backfires. It’s manipulative, even if the man doesn’t realize it. He’s not giving freely — he’s giving with strings attached.

That’s not how Christ gave himself.

Jesus laid down his life in obedience to the Father. He was not manipulated into it. He did not do it because the Church asked him. He did it because he was fulfilling a plan formed before the foundation of the world. He went to the cross not to please the Church, but to glorify the Father and redeem his Bride. He took action. He led. He bled. He rose again. And he did it all from a position of abundance, not need.

His sacrifice wasn’t the fruit of insecurity. It was the fruit of mission. He had what we needed. He didn’t need what we had. He wasn’t trying to get something from us — he was giving everything to us. 

This is the essential difference between nice guys and godly men. Nice guys serve to be filled. Godly men serve because they are full. Nice guys are needy. Godly men are generous. Nice guys give because they’re desperate for approval. Godly men give because they know they’re already approved.

The root issue here is one of control. Specifically, where a man believes control lies in his life. Psychologists call this a “locus of control.” A man with an internal locus believes his choices, his actions, and his mindset — these determine the outcome. A man with an external locus believes it’s fate, luck, other people, systemic obstacles — things beyond his control.

Nice guys almost always have an external locus. Their entire worldview is built around the idea that someone else is responsible for their happiness. That’s why they feel like victims. That’s why they’re constantly frustrated. That’s why they think if they just please everyone, things will finally go their way. But that day never comes.

Scripture blows this mindset apart. Proverbs teaches that a man’s life reflects his heart. His outer world mirrors his inner world. His fruit comes from his roots. And if his house is a wreck, his finances are a mess, his health is in decline, and his relationships are shallow, the first place he needs to look is the mirror.

Yes, there are always other factors. But the man is the main one. That’s the default assumption Scripture teaches. Not that everything is his fault, but that he is responsible. And if he takes responsibility, God will meet him there.

This brings us to the concept of the male burden of performance. Simply put, men are judged by what they do. They are expected to build, to protect, to provide, to lead. That’s not a social construct. That’s Genesis. Adam was given a mission before he was given a wife. Dominion is in the male DNA. We are made to work. We are made to act.

That’s why passivity is so soul-killing. That’s why unemployment crushes men. That’s why retirement often leads to depression. A man without a mission is like a sword left in its sheath — unused, dulled, and wasting away.

This is why women are attracted to competence. To strength. To leadership. To performance. It’s not shallow. It’s built into them. Just as men are drawn to beauty and warmth and receptivity, women are drawn to a man who can get things done. Who has a direction. Who doesn’t need her to be his emotional crutch.

When a man tries to win a woman’s heart through neediness — through niceness — he repels her. She may not even know why. But she’ll feel it. She’ll feel like she’s the one carrying the relationship. She’ll feel like she’s being led by a limp handshake. And that breeds contempt.

So what’s the way forward?

First, we must abandon the false gospel of nice-guyism. You don’t need to earn love through performance. You don’t need to beg for scraps of approval. You already have the love of the Father in Christ. You are a son. You are an heir. You are accepted.

Second, you must embrace your design. You were made to be a man. That’s not a flaw. That’s a feature. You were built for action. Built to lead. Built to build. Yes, the fall makes it harder. Yes, the ground resists you. Yes, the curse presses down. But your design is good.

Third, you must live mission-first. Christ came to do the will of his Father, and so must you. That mission gives meaning to your work, your sacrifice, and your relationships. It frees you from people-pleasing because your eyes are fixed on the throne, not the crowd.

Finally, you must believe that your labor in the Lord is not in vain. Not every effort will be rewarded in this life. But all of it matters. Even the mundane. Even the overlooked. Even the painful. “Whatever you do, do it heartily, as for the Lord and not for men.” That is the abundance mindset. That is freedom.

The way of Christ is not easy, but it is light. It is not safe, but it is good. And it leads to real joy, real peace, and real masculinity. So stop being nice. Start being good. And live like it’s good to be a man.



🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Canadian Machinery Production

 As I have said many times ... people outside don't know much about Canada!

https://wwwp-lives.blogspot.com/2025/05/british-king-charles-arrives-in-canada.html



Manufacturing in Canada began early in the 18th century 

Canadian Manufacturing Origins

Canadian manufacturing equipment is sourced from various domestic and international manufacturers. Major provinces like Ontario and Quebec are key manufacturing hubs in Canada. Ontario, in particular, accounts for 47% of Canadian manufacturing sales and is home to significant automotive manufacturing operations by companies such as Ford, Honda, Volvo, and Toyota. Quebec is notable for its aerospace equipment production, with companies like Bombardier, Pratt & Whitney Canada, and CAE headquartered in Montreal. Additionally, Canadian manufacturers have been involved in the development and production of machinery and equipment used in exploring, developing, and distributing energy resources, such as those from Alberta's oil sands.

Canada produces a wide range of machinery and equipment, including pumps and compressors, rolling-mill and metalworking equipment, forestry equipment, mining equipment, farm machinery, construction equipment, and service industries equipment.

Canadian Machinery Production

The machinery and equipment industry in Canada has a long history, with about 30 to 40 firms manufacturing machinery and equipment for other industries by the time of Confederation in 1867. By 1967, there were 15 Canadian machinery firms that were 100 years or older.

Today, the industry is heavily dependent on export markets, with exports accounting for 62% of the industry's real growth between 1975 and 1985. In 1985, the industry exported 51% of its production, with $2.8 billion or 75% of exports going to .

Machinery Canada, a company that provides machinery and equipment, offers a variety of products including coolants, cutting oils, lubricants, and accessories. They also carry a full line of toolholders, collets, and other machine tools.

https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/manufacturing



Accused killer of Israeli diplomats attended ‘resistance’ conference, courtesy of ‘shadowy left-wing network’


Chuck Ross at the Washington Free Beacon reported on Friday that Elias Rodriguez, the accused killer of Israeli diplomats Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim, had actually attended a “resistance” conference at Howard University back in 2017, with Rodriguez’s participation being sponsored by a “shadowy left-wing network” that serves as a “conduit” between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the anti-Israel movement in the U.S. And, considering the influence from communist China, you shouldn’t be surprised to learn one bit that the event had a very communist vibe—Ross writes this:

Rodriguez rubbed shoulders with ‘comrades’ from pro-Hamas groups and other radical organizations, coming away impressed with their ‘commitment to actually getting things done,’ according to a video and an online fundraiser unearthed by the Washington Free Beacon.

Now, I previously wrote on the fact that Elias hails from an “activist” family, one which has few degrees of separation from Chicago’s most notorious agitator, Saul Alinsky—read that post here—which is how he secured funding for the “resistance” conference:

ANSWER Chicago, a subsidiary of the left-wing ANSWER Coalition, raised money to send Rodriguez to the People’s Congress of Resistance, a two-day conference at Howard University held to ‘chart a path of nationwide grassroots resistance and mobilization to defeat Trump’s reactionary program of unrestrained capitalism.’ ANSWER Coalition, the anti-war group CODEPINK, and Samidoun, a pro-Hamas organization designated last year as a terrorist group, organized the resistance conference.

‘Help us send Elias Rodriguez, a young resister and son of an Iraq war veteran, to the People’s Congress of Resistance,’ ANSWER Chicago wrote in a social media post soliciting donations for Rodriguez.

Okay, so ANSWER is receiving money from communist China…the groups hates what it calls “capitalism,” which is really just allowing people the freedom to make business deals based on their own best interests…the conference was full of “comrades,” which is the favored term of endearment between communist nut-jobs, and it was designated as the “People’s Congress of Resistance.” I don’t know about you, but that last one sure sounds like a very unoriginal imitation of the People’s Republic of China, which is the official name of communist China.

Communism is all about the “people”—but only in word, not in deed, of course. The ideology, and its followers, are responsible for hundreds of millions of deaths in just the last century alone—all of which I would call political killings. A high body count is just part and parcel of a communist agenda.

But hey, give the murder cult a chance! It’s just never been done the right” way.



Deputy Director Dan Bongino States He and Kash Patel will Begin FBI Reform “by Next Week”


…. Thank you for your patience. Apparently, public backlash from the Kash Patel and Dan Bongino interview with Maria Bartiromo has penetrated the membrane around them.

FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino announces the FBI “reform teams” will likely be in place next week.  From there, they will begin reviewing subjects of interest to the American people, including: (1) the J6 pipe bomber, (2) the White House cocaine user, and (3) the Dobbs leaker.

FBI DIRECTOR DAN BONGINO (via X): – […] The Director and I will have most of our incoming reform teams in place by next week. The hiring process can take a little bit of time, but we are approaching that finish line. This will help us both in doubling down on our reform agenda.

Shortly after swearing in, the Director and I evaluated a number of cases of potential public corruption that, understandably, have garnered public interest. We made the decision to either re-open, or push additional resources and investigative attention, to these cases. These cases are the DC pipe bombing investigation, the cocaine discovery at the prior administration’s White House, and the leak of the Supreme Court Dobbs case. I receive requested briefings on these cases weekly and we are making progress. If you have any investigative tips on these matters that may assist us then please contact the FBI.

The Director and I have done only one media interview together. We decided early on to limit our media footprint overall in order to keep the attention on the work being done. There are both positives and negatives to this approach. We have chosen to communicate, in writing, on this platform to fill some of the inevitable information vacuums. I try to read as much of your feedback as possible, but the workday is busy, and my office is a SCIF with limited phone access. In response to feedback, both positive and negative, from our interview last week we will be releasing more information which will further clarify answers to some of the questions asked in the interview. (LINK)

Priorities.

Previously unreleased excerpt below:



Race Hoaxer Jussie Smollett Goes on Wild Social Media Tirade Proclaiming Innocence


Bob Hoge reporting for RedState 

You’d think disgraced actor Jussie Smollett would do the smart thing: have a come-to-Jesus moment, beg the public for forgiveness, and announce he’s going to treatment for some undisclosed psychological ailment. The plan has worked for numerous scandal-ridden stars before him, and it would have been his only real chance at redemption. 

He's choosing not to take it.

You’ll probably recall that the “Empire” thespian claimed in 2019 that he was attacked by two thugs wearing MAGA hats in the dead of a frigid Chicago night when he went to get a Subway sandwich. As I wrote previously about the case, “His story was so full of holes, it made Swiss cheese jealous.”

On Friday, Smollett agreed to settle a civil suit with the city by forking over $50,000 to the local charity of his choice. By Saturday, he was back to laughably proclaiming his innocence despite mountains of evidence to the contrary:

It’s all a plot by the City of Chicago, you see:

In an Instagram post on Saturday, Smollett accused the city of Chicago working as part of a conspiracy to discredit his claim of being a victim of a hate crime.

“Over six years ago, after it was reported I had been jumped, City Officials in Chicago set out to convince the public that I willfully set an assault against myself. This false narrative has left a stain on my character that will not soon disappear,” Smollett wrote.

“These officials wanted my money and wanted my confession for something I did not do. Today, it should be clear…They have received neither,” he continued.

Snort, chortle, laugh. Or as our thankfully ex-president might have said, “C’mon, man!”

Did you forget about this, Jussie?

Smollett’s legal journey was long and twisted, but essentially, a George Soros-backed prosecutor messed the whole thing up “accidentally on purpose.” I reported on the back and forth in November 2024:

First, cops wasted money and time investigating, then they realized it was a hoax, and then he was charged with staging a fake hate crime. However, the charges were later dropped by woke Cook County State's Attorney Kim Foxx because she claimed that Smollett performed community service, which was punishment enough. Outrage naturally ensued, a special prosecutor was assigned to reinvestigate, they charged him, and he was convicted on five counts of disorderly conduct.

It was a disgusting case from day one, but justice was finally served, right?

Not so fast. On Thursday [November 24], the state Supreme Court overturned said justice.

Smollett is now claiming the court’s decision proved he was innocent, but it proved nothing of the sort. What he seems not to be comprehending is that the ruling had exactly zero to do with his guilt or innocence—it was based on procedural grounds due to Foxx's antics:

In fact, special prosecutor Dan Webb argued that the ruling had “nothing to do with Mr. Smollett’s innocence.”

“The Illinois Supreme Court did not find any error with the overwhelming evidence presented at trial… or the jury’s unanimous verdict that Mr. Smollett was guilty of five counts of felony disorderly conduct,” he said at the time.

Smollett, some advice: exit stage left. This type of gaslighting is only making you more of a laughingstock and is highly unlikely to get your Hollywood career back on track. The reason is simple: nobody with a brain believes you.