Friday, May 9, 2025

Mutually Assured Law Enforcement Destruction


Earlier this week, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents raided at least nine restaurants in the nation's capital, requesting proof that the establishments are not flouting the law by employing illegal aliens. Washington, D.C., presents itself as a so-called sanctuary city for illegal aliens, so the mere fact ICE agents targeted a few businesses there is hardly surprising.

What is perhaps more newsworthy is the specific names associated with those raided restaurants. One of those restaurants, Chef Geoff's, is owned by Geoff Tracy, the husband of CBS News anchor and former vice presidential debate co-moderator Norah O'Donnell. Another of the raided restaurants is owned by former Biden White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients, and a third is owned by the left-wing activist Spanish restaurateur, Jose Andres.

Following the raids, a predictable debate has unfolded: Did the Trump administration "politicize" law enforcement by siccing ICE agents on White House critics and foes?

Maybe; maybe not. Regardless, and with all due respect to the pearl-clutchers, permit a moment of unfettered bluntness: I simply do not care. And I highly suspect tens of millions of other Americans don't care either. After years of politicized law enforcement, many of us are now sufficiently jaded so as to be well past the point of shock at new examples.

Did the ICE raid pearl-clutchers express similar dismay when, in 2013, Obama-era IRS director Lois Lerner admitted to targeting conservative groups in an attempt to improperly strip them of their tax-exempt status? Did they care when, that same year, the elderly nuns of the Little Sisters of the Poor were forced to sue the Obama administration in order to not violate their faith and subsidize abortifacients?

Did the pearl-clutchers care when the Biden administration sued pro-life activists for praying outside abortion clinics? Did they care when the same administration threw the book at seemingly every "J6-er" defendant -- even those who innocently traipsed through the open doors of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021? Did they care when that administration imprisoned Trump allies Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro for rejecting subpoenas of the bogus, made-for-TV Jan. 6 House committee? Above all, did they care when that administration crossed the ultimate Rubicon by prosecuting its preeminent political opponent, the then-former president and leading presidential hopeful?

The answer to all these rhetorical questions is simple: no. Of course they didn't care. So you'll have to spare me for not viewing it as a particularly big deal that a few Washington restaurants had the feds show up to request immigration papers.

In fact, I'll go further: It would be a good thing if the Trump administration sent a message by targeting these three Washingtonian restaurants.

The well-known kindergarten teaching that "two wrongs don't make a right" notwithstanding, it is also elementary game theory that unilateral disarmament in the face of an insatiable foe is a proven strategic failure. People on the right had their turn being targeted under former Presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama, and it would be folly for conservatives to assume a faux "high road" now that they are in power.

True, a prior generation of Republicans would have been content to morally preen and rest on their laurels, content with what this column has referred to as "principled loserdom." But those days are over.

Indeed, those days must be over -- not merely for the good of the Right but for the good of the country. While resource scarcity poses real constraints and some degree of prosecutorial discretion is thus inescapable, it is also true that American law enforcement has become much more politicized in recent decades. That trend began with the Obama administration, and it reached a nadir with the Biden administration.

Patriotic Americans who care about the rule of law and our constitutional order ought to lament this sordid state of affairs -- not just the latest twist in the long-running saga but the whole sad story. The key question, then, is how to undo the damage and restore Left-Right prosecutorial and law enforcement relations to the pre-Obama status quo ante.

To borrow another of this column's favorite phrases, the only way out here is through. Both sides of America's fraught political divide must come to accept a Cold War-era paradigm of mutually assured destruction. This mindset saved the planet from nuclear holocaust once, and now it can help us return our domestic politics to something resembling normalcy.

But for the Left to accept the threat of mutually assured destruction, they're going to have to first see the other side bare its fangs a bit. Some noses must be (proverbially) bloodied. And frankly, given the unprecedented magnitude of the past few years' lawfare campaign against President Donald Trump, sending ICE agents into a few restaurants barely even registers.

I want an end to the "politicized law enforcement" wars. So should you. It is ironic that we need a short-term escalation in order to have a chance of reaching a long-term stasis. But it's the cold, hard truth.



X22, And we Know, and more- May 9

 



Would the Left Finally Explain the Inexplicable? ~ VDH


Somewhere between 10 and 12 million illegal aliens were invited into the United States by the Biden administration.

As far as logistics go, former President Joe Biden could not flee Afghanistan without getting 13 Marines killed and abandoning to the terrorist Taliban $50 billion in munitions, a billion-dollar embassy, and a $300 million retrofitted huge airbase.

But Biden and his handlers proved far more logistically capable when their target was fellow Americans.

After all, they somehow managed to stop the congressionally approved continuance of the border wall, to subvert federal immigration law, to emasculate the border patrol, and to ensure that millions of people around the world could simply walk into the U.S. illegally, unaudited and with impunity.

But why did Biden or his puppeteers do something so anarchic, so injurious to their fellow Americans?

Why cost the nation hundreds of billions of dollars in massive new entitlements? Why swamp the social services of our own poor citizens?

Why turn loose half a million criminal aliens and gang members to prey on our own weak and defenseless?

Was the idea to alter the demography in one fell swoop? To grow the dependent class, thereby expanding government?

Was it pure spite born of hatred of half the country?

Was it to ensure future constituencies, given that the Democratic agenda no longer appeals to most Americans?

Was it a globalist gambit to demonstrate borders are anachronistic?

Was it to fast-track new voters under the laxity of post-2020 early- and mail-in voting protocols?

Those who perpetrated the greatest ruse in American presidential history by staging the Biden presidency will never tell us what their ultimate agenda was.

They knowingly fixed the 2020 primaries to ensure a non-compos-Biden would be nominated. Under the cover of the COVID lockdowns, they kept him in his basement while operatives radically altered the voting laws in the key swing states.

For the next four years, they put their waxen effigy in a hermetically sealed cocoon -- one of avoidance of the press, three-day workweeks, and four-hour workdays.

Yet Biden could still not read huge-font, teleprompted scripts. He could not finish a simple call for unity without snarling, screaming, and damning his opposition as "semi-fascists," "ultra-MAGA," and "garbage."

Was the point to salvage the Democratic Party for one last hurrah before the Squad, and the Sanders socialists inevitably took over and destroyed it?

Was that the idea behind clearing the primary field and anointing a decrepit "good ol' Joe Biden from Scranton" veneer?

Or was it more sinister still in the sense that a debilitated Biden facade was a godsend for the left? Did his pseudo-centrist cover ensure that his handlers -- the Obama crowd, the DEI chauvinists, and the Sanders socialists -- could enact from the shadows the most radical agenda since 1933?

Will anyone ever tell us why they endangered and nearly ruined the country with a zombie president?

Why did the left break every prior pretense of legality and of fair play in trying to wreck an entire legal system just to destroy Donald Trump?

Why did the so-called stewards of jurisprudence coordinate four local, state, and federal prosecutions to cook up 93 indictments -- the vast majority of them ridiculous contortions that will never be charged against any other American?

What was behind the disastrous effort to de-ballot Trump in most of the blue states? To "save" democracy by destroying it?

Why did they twice impeach a president and then try him as a private citizen?

Why did SWAT teams swarm an ex-president's home to carry off over 10,000 documents in order to find 102 classified files?

Why did the FBI bring their own pre-prepared classification labels? Why scatter photo files on the floor?

Had Trump destroyed subpoenaed evidence like Hillary Clinton's emails?

Had Trump stored the files, Biden-style, at four different locations?

Had Trump earlier just flunked rather than aced the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, would special counsel Jack Smith -- as did Robert Hur in the Biden file case -- have dropped all the charges against Trump on the grounds he was "an elderly man with a poor memory?"

So, what was behind the four years of trying to blow up and discredit our legal and law enforcement system just to destroy Trump?

Was their goad his accent, his bombast, or his tan that so drove the elite left into insanity?

Were they convinced they could never beat him in another election?

Did they hate him because, in his first term, he had secured the border, grown the economy, and had no wars abroad?

Or was it an unstoppable fixation, a destructive addiction?

In sum, the more he mocked them, the more they sought to destroy him -- and all the more they ensured he would be president again.



Trump to build national center for homeless veterans with funds previously spent on housing for illegal aliens

 

Trump signed an executive order to establish the National Center for Warrior Independence on the Veterans Affairs campus in West Los Angeles  


FIRST ON FOX: President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order to establish a national center for homeless veterans with redirected funds previously spent on services for illegal aliens, Fox News Digital has learned. 

The president’s order directs the secretary of veterans affairs to establish the National Center for Warrior Independence on the Veterans Affairs campus in West Los Angeles. 


Los Angeles has approximately 3,000 homeless veterans — more than any other city in the country, and accounting for about 10% of all homeless veterans in America, according to the White House. 


"The new National Center for Warrior Independence will help them and other veterans like them rebuild their lives," the White House said. 

The center will allow veterans from around the nation to seek and receive care, benefits and services "to which they are entitled," the White House said. 

The order redirects funds previously spent on housing or other services for illegal aliens to constructing, establishing and maintaining the new center. 

"The Center will promote self-sufficiency through housing, substance abuse treatment, and support for productive work for the veterans housed there," the White House explained. 

It said the goal is to house up to 6,000 homeless veterans at the center by 2028.  


The order also directs the secretary of housing and urban development to use vouchers to support homeless veterans and instructs the secretary of veterans affairs to "restore accountability at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)." 

The order also instructs the VA to take action against individuals who have committed misconduct and to investigate and rectify the Biden administration’s decision to "rehire and reinstate back pay for employees previously fired for misconduct."  

The order also ensures that veterans will have access to increased options for care, benefits and services — including reduced wait times for Veterans Health Administration appointments through options such as expanded hours, weekend appointments and virtual healthcare.

The order also directs a feasibility study at the Manchester VA Medical Center to expand services to support a full-service medical center in New Hampshire.  


"President Trump strongly believes that every veteran deserves our gratitude, and that the federal government should treat veterans like the heroes they are," the White House said. 

The order comes a week after the White House announced that Trump will host a military parade on June 14 to honor military veterans and active-duty service members and commemorate the U.S. Army’s 250th birthday


 https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-build-national-center-homeless-veterans-funds-previously-spent-illegal-aliens   









Ric Grenell Drops Some Reality on Kennedy Center Performers Threatening Boycott of Trump Appearance


Becca Lower reporting for RedState 

To paraphrase something my colleague Susie Moore stated in an earlier piece about the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals providing much-needed guidance to lower courts on a miniscule group of the barrage of cases against President Trump and his administration, we continue to follow the saga of the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C. Readers likely remember the brouhaha by progressives near the beginning of Trump's new term when he announced he was kicking off some of the board members and appointing himself the new chair of the famed arts venue. 

Although a few days later, the president named former U.S. ambassador to Germany and U.S. Envoy for Special Missions, Ric Grenell, as interim executive director. 

During CPAC 2025, Grenell addressed the poor state of the Kennedy Center's finances, sharing that Pres. Trump likely has the same concerns about the organization's ability to "Make Art Great Again," as Grenell put it in the interview with Politico's Dasha Burns. 

I think, I don't know for sure, but I think the frustration President Trump has is that the Kennedy Center has no cash on hand. No reserves. And they have been paying for the salaries with the debt reserves. While taking around more than 40 million dollars in public money. You can't have that. If you're going to take public money, then you get to have public input.

So, what we're gonna say at the Kennedy Center, first of all, we gotta clean up the financial situation. We have to do the big productions that the masses and the public want to see. We want to have really big programming.

And my colleague Jennifer Oliver O'Connell included one tidbit that leftists went wild over before Grenell cleared it up--and it relates to Thursday's story:

Grenell also cleared up some misinformation about an artist who supposedly dropped out from performing on the Kennedy Center stage because Trump took over the center and installed Grenell. Grenell made it known that some of these decisions were made before Trump took over, and the decision to drop the act was based on the performance not producing adequate ticket sales.

He also hinted that the Center will have a special Christmas show. Maybe we'll get more details on that in the coming months. Anyway, earlier this week, some performers in the traveling cast of "Les Misérables" who were slated to take part in an upcoming charity fundraiser/performance at the Center threatened to boycott it ... because Pres. Trump is set to appear.

On Wednesday, while speaking to Entertainment Weekly, Ric Grenell just laid out the "Les Miz" performers, according to industry publication Variety. First, it seemed this was the first time he had heard the "rumor" about the controversy, then he added, "But the Kennedy Center will no longer fund intolerance.”

He stated that it shows who isn't "professional" in the performance company, and that any producer thinking of hiring any of these performers might be inspired to think again. 

Here's his full quote:

“Any performer who isn’t professional enough to perform for patrons of all backgrounds, regardless of political affiliation, won’t be welcomed,” Grenell added. “In fact, we think it would be important to out those vapid and intolerant artists to ensure producers know who they shouldn’t hire — and that the public knows which shows have political litmus tests to sit in the audience.”

He continued, “The Kennedy Center wants to be a place where people of all political stripes sit next to each other and never ask who someone voted for but instead enjoy a performance together.”

This is exactly how Republicans need to handle this sort of childish wokeness from the "resistance" to America First principles and all things Trump. Let's keep on this path. Warn them that there are real-world consequences for their emotional virtue signaling--and let the chips fall where they may.



🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Another round of violent pro-Hamas protestors at Columbia, and Marco Rubio gets busy


Some people are stuck on stupid.

Some of them can be found at Columbia University, where pro-Hamas protestors reared their ugly heads and took over Butler Library, just as students were studying for finals.

According to Fox News:

Hours after more than 100 masked anti-Israel agitators stormed the Butler Library at Columbia University in New York City, pushing past campus security as students prepared for finals Wednesday afternoon, college officials summoned the New York Police Department (NYPD) in an effort to subdue the unruly mob.

More than 80 people have been arrested, all students at the university, NYPD sources told Fox News. 

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) was also monitoring the situation. If arrests were made, the suspects were to be fingerprinted to determine if any are non-citizens, Fox News has learned.

Since I'm an alum, Columbia's acting president, Claire Shipman, put out this note in my email:

Dear members of the Columbia community:

Earlier today, a group of protesters occupied one of the main reading rooms in Butler library, refusing to leave, and another group breached the front door causing substantial chaos—all of this as the bulk of our students are working hard to prepare for exams. These actions not only represented a violation of University policies, but they also posed a serious risk to our students and campus safety. We had no choice but to ask for the assistance of the NYPD, and I’m grateful for their help and professionalism, as well as that of our Public Safety team. Let me be clear, what happened today, what I witnessed, was utterly unacceptable.

I spent the late afternoon and evening at Butler Library, as events were unfolding, to understand the situation on the ground and to be able to make the best decisions possible. I arrived to see one of our Public Safety officers wheeled out on a gurney and another getting bandaged. As I left hours later, I walked through the reading room, one of the many jewels of Butler Library, and I saw it defaced and damaged in disturbing ways and with disturbing slogans. Violence and vandalism, hijacking a library—none of that has any place on our campus. These aren’t Columbia’s values.

It sounds quite a bit more horrible than the media was reporting.

After this, she eventually called the cops:

Let me also make clear, our administration spent substantial time working to diffuse the situation in multiple ways, through Public Safety and Delegate visits to the students, scenes I witnessed firsthand. The students were told they simply needed to identify themselves and then leave, but most refused. I worked with professors who generously came to have the same conversations. I am enormously grateful for the many people we have in our community, our Public Safety officers, our faculty, our staff, and my team, who work so hard to make Columbia what we know it can be and should be for our community. I also made sure to be present when the police arrived; I wanted to see for myself how the operation would unfold, and I’m grateful that it was orderly, professional, and extremely limited, with a focus on the students who refused to leave the reading room.

Unfortunately, then she pivoted to the usual weakness, starting with talking to these thugs like they were kindergarteners learning what is and isn't civil disobedience:

We, at Columbia, value freedom of speech, robust debate, and peaceful protest. Today’s disruption of Butler Library was not that. We must, and we will, come together as a community to consider what civil disobedience actually is and what it means. We need to recognize that when rules are violated, when a community is disrupted for the sake of a few, that is a considered choice—one with real consequences. There is a clear line between legitimate protest and actions that endanger others and disrupt the fundamental work of the University. Today that line was crossed, and I have confidence the disciplinary proceedings will reflect the severity of the actions.

I am working with the Provost and University Life to ensure any affected students receive the support and resources they need. We have opened a new study space at Uris that will be available overnight for students.

Let me also say this. I’ve received many messages from concerned parents. The group involved less than one percent of our 36,000-person student body. Their actions had a disproportionate impact.

She should have called the cops immediately instead of "negotiated" with them, and they needed to arrive with billy clubs and paddy wagons.

Those kids at Columbia pay tens of thousands of dollars each year to study there and they have a right to do it before finals. Providing them with an 'alternate' space is pretty outrageous, given the crazed clowns in their library.

The protestors needed to be raked out and handed over to immigration authorities for appropriate dispatch.

Columbia has been through this before, with everything wrecked about a year or two ago. Now there's a new government and a new president, and this nonsense is not being tolerated. But Shipman, who saw her two predecessors thrown out for this kind of weakness, seems to be following this garden path, which is why these protests are happening.

It was astonishing, given that previous pro-Hamas protestors there have had their visas yanked and been thrown out, while Columbia itself has had its funding pulled over the antisemitism issue. The best response to a problem like that would be to send in the toughest cops on the block, immediately, with no backtalk tolerated, to get those disruptive bounders out of there.

Fortunately, not everyone is as weak-kneed as Shipman.

Marco Rubio has gotten busy: 


And one can only hope that the sob stories for the press follow about these "scholars" who are really disruptive terrorist sympathizers, if not terrorists, who really meant to vandalize the school and ruin finals.

Rubio is right to throw them out since Shipman is just going to try to talk to them, and when he does, the problem doesn't come back.



What Is The Point Of Having A GOP Congress?


What’s become increasingly clear is that absent Trump and a few Republicans, the GOP lacks the willingness and ability to govern.



Throughout the 2024 election cycle, Republicans pledged that, if elected, they would use their congressional majorities to reverse the disastrous policies enacted by President Biden and Democrats. Whether it was bringing down Bidenflation or curbing the border invasion, the campaign message from the GOP was clear: Elect us and we’ll fix it.

But now that they’ve been given the reins of power, many congressional Republicans have shown little interest in actually governing in accordance with the pitch they made to voters just a few short months ago.

On Wednesday, reporting surfaced that a cabal of House Republicans is fighting efforts to end the flow of federal taxpayer funds to Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion provider, which also offers harmful chemical and surgical castration procedures. According to NOTUS, this group of lawmakers — which reportedly included Republican Reps. Mike Lawler, Brian Fitzpatrick, and Jen Kiggans — “made it clear to House GOP leadership that they oppose adding a measure to cut federal funding to Planned Parenthood” to the House’s reconciliation package.

So, if slashing the taxpayer subsidization of entities that terminate unborn babies isn’t on the budget chopping block for Republicans, then what is?

It’s apparently not fully repealing Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act or making significant reforms and reductions to Medicaid. Congressional GOPers have come out opposing both options over the course of the party’s reconciliation negotiations.

And what about enshrining President Trump’s executive actions (abolishing the Education Department and DOGE cuts) or other conservative-backed priorities (judicial reform and major spending cuts) into the package? Where’s the sense of urgency among Republicans to do those things?

While time will tell what a final reconciliation bill will entail, the writing on the wall does not bode well for conservative voters wanting to enact generational change at the federal level. Much like their failed 2017 effort to repeal and replace Obamacare, many congressional Republicans seem more interested in protecting Democrats’ overreaching and destructive policies than defanging them.

What’s become increasingly clear is that, absent Trump and a few Republicans, the GOP lacks the willingness and ability to govern.

Unlike their Democrat counterparts, Republicans have no concrete, collective worldview. The party is a coalition of competing ideological factions that fail to agree upon a singular vision of what is viewed as American success, a reality that inevitably produces the type of intraparty policy disputes evidenced in the ongoing reconciliation negotiations.

The GOP’s biggest defenders will often concede that the party has its issues but argue that a Republican-run government is better than a Democrat one because the latter’s policies are far more dangerous and catastrophic. While that may be true, it doesn’t change the long-term consequences of Republicans’ fecklessness.

Putting a Band-Aid on a leaky pipe doesn’t fix the leaky pipe. It merely slows the leakage and neglects to fix the root of the problem.

The same is true of having a GOP-run Congress.

If electing Republicans is only about temporarily stopping the bleeding caused by Democrats without repealing their disastrous policies and replacing them with conservative-based solutions, then what is the point of having a Republican-run Congress at all? Under this logic, conservatives would essentially be voting for managed decline over immediate decline. In the end, everyone still loses.

This is in no way an advocation for Democrat control of government. It is a diagnosis of the establishment rot plaguing the Republican Party, and a call to action for conservatives to start taking self-governance seriously.

Being an American citizen doesn’t mean showing up to vote every two to four years and going home until the next election. It’s a duty that requires paying attention to and engaging with one’s representatives (at all levels of government) and involving oneself in the political process as much as possible.

This could mean participating in primaries to oust Republicans who fail to abide by their voters’ wishes, showing up at town halls or local board meetings, or contacting legislators about a certain nomination or bill and encouraging like-minded friends to do the same. It could also include pressuring Trump to make better endorsements and hold weak-kneed Republicans’ feet to the fire for sidelining conservative priorities in critical legislation (like major spending cuts in his “big, beautiful” reconciliation package).

The bottom line is that the Republican Party is only as good as the voters who comprise it are willing to make it.

Yes, the entrenched establishment is going to fight tooth and nail to stop conservatives from taking back their party. But the alternative (i.e., doing nothing) means the current cycle in which Democrats destroy the country while Republicans stand around kicking rocks will continue — and that is a pattern this country cannot afford.



President Trump Announces the Appointment of Judge Jeanine Pirro to be U.S. Attorney for Washington, DC

VIA TRUTH SOCIAL: – “I am pleased to announce that Judge Jeanine Pirro will be appointed interim United States Attorney for the District of Columbia. Jeanine was Assistant District Attorney for Westchester County, New York, and then went on to serve as County Judge, and District Attorney, where she was the first woman ever to be elected to those positions. During her time in office, Jeanine was a powerful crusader for victims of crime. Her establishment of the Domestic Violence Bureau in her Prosecutor’s Office was the first in the Nation. She excelled in all ways. In addition to her Legal career, Jeanine previously hosted her own Fox News Show, Justice with Judge Jeanine, for ten years, and is currently Co-Host of The Five, one of the Highest Rated Shows on Television. Jeanine is incredibly well qualified for this position, and is considered one of the Top District Attorneys in the History of the State of New York. She is in a class by herself. Congratulations Jeanine!” [LINK]


President Trump Announces Move of Ed Martin to DOJ Weaponization Investigation Working Group



As anticipated, President Trump has moved Acting USAO Ed Martin to an internal position within Main Justice where he will oversee a review of the Dept of Justice weaponization efforts that took place under Joe Biden.

Mr Martin will also be responsible for reviewing pardons as the DOJ pardon attorney, which also seems to align with the “autopen” review.

(Via Truth Social) – “Ed Martin has done an AMAZING job as interim U.S. Attorney, and will be moving to the Department of Justice as the new Director of the Weaponization Working Group, Associate Deputy Attorney General, and Pardon Attorney. In these highly important roles, Ed will make sure we finally investigate the Weaponization of our Government under the Biden Regime, and provide much needed Justice for its victims. Congratulations Ed!”

.


Trump Administration Shuts Down ALL Cruel Beagle Testing Labs at NIH

 


President Donald Trump’s director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, announced over the weekend that the agency has officially closed its last remaining beagle experiment lab.

The decision follows the exposure of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s widely criticized beagle testing program, which sparked national outrage.

“It’s very easy, for instance, to cure Alzheimer’s in mice. But those things don’t translate to humans,” Bhattacharya told Fox News.

“So we put forward a policy to replace animals in research with technological advances, AI and other tools, that actually translate better to human health.”

When Bhattacharya declared, “We got rid of all of the beagle experiments on the NIH campus,” Fox News host Rachel Campos-Duffy responded, “Amen.”

NIH later confirmed the move on social media, stating it had enacted an “initiative to expand innovative, human-based science while reducing animal use in research, including getting rid of all the beagle experiments on the NIH campus.”

Watch:

A years-long investigation by watchdog group White Coat Waste revealed that the NIH killed more than 2,100 beagles in “brutal septic shock experiments” dating back to 1986.

_____________________________

“The NIH pumps pneumonia-causing bacteria into beagles’ lungs, bleeds them out, and forces dogs into septic shock,” the report states.

READ: NIH Bloodbath: Trump Admin Removes Fauci’s Closest Allies, Including His Wife

“After four days of infection, NIH kills the beagles—and stuffs their bodies into a refrigerator.”

“As the watchdog that first uncovered and battled Dr. Fauci’s beagle tests (the biggest animal testing scandal in history), we’re proud that White Coat Waste has closed the NIH’s last in-house beagle laboratory—and the US government’s biggest dog lab,” said White Coat Waste Project Founder Anthony Bellotti in a statement to the Daily Caller News Foundation.

“We applaud the President for cutting this wasteful NIH spending and will keep fighting until we defund all dog labs at home and abroad.”
_____________________________

In one of the most disturbing experiments funded by Fauci’s division, hundreds of ticks were allowed to feast on beagle puppies that were injected with mutant bacteria.

The research, conducted at Kansas State University in 2021, resulted in the death of 28 beagle puppies annually—totaling “between 126 and 138 dogs” since the study’s inception in December 2007.

White Coat Waste also exposed a separate project funded by Fauci’s NIH division, in which part of a $375,800 grant was sent to a lab in Tunisia to “drug beagles and lock their heads in mesh cages filled with hungry sand flies so that the insects could eat them alive.”

“They also locked beagles alone in cages in the desert overnight for nine consecutive nights to use them as bait to attract infectious sand flies,” the organization added.

The Trump administration has also begun phasing out animal testing across other government agencies.

Animal rights group PETA praised the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for “helping spare tens of thousands of animals each year.”

READ: Gabbard Drops Massive Bombshell on Fauci’s Role in COVID-19 Lab Research





Editorial note by 💩DooDy💩: I realized to my surprise, that many people were unaware of this and similar situations. This is due to the fact that MSM ("main stream media"), "Legacy Media, Corporate Media however you want to identify it, was silent on this as it is on so many other things that don't fit their NARRATIVE. Folks! Corporate media LIES on just about everything and OMISSION is the biggest kind of lie there is. Turn OFF your damn TV and cable news outlets because they lie about everything.

Standby folks as I am not done with this issue as there is even more to come. There are a few good endings in my follow up piece upcoming even though they are sad and bittersweet.