Thursday, May 1, 2025

President Trump, Rock On!


“I am flying high over Tupelo, Mississippi, with America’s hottest band, and we are all about to die.”  That’s the opening line for a fictional Rolling Stone article in Cameron Crowe’s somewhat autobiographical rock journalism tribute, Almost Famous.  It’s a great sentence, and it runs through my head every morning as I digest the latest mainstream news ramblings regarding the White House.  

President Trump has been in office for a hundred days, and during each of those eventful days, a reporter representing the interests of the largest corporate newsrooms screams in print or on television some version of “I’m here at the White House, and we’re all about to die!”  It never gets old.

Journalists’ endless hyperventilating about President Trump’s every move makes clear that he is unquestionably the lead singer of America’s hottest band.  The same reporters who rage against the MAGA machine are White House groupies who can’t help but chase after the president to see what he’ll do next.  (Before some WHPC noob says, “That’s our job,” I’ll point out that nobody was chasing down pretend “President” Biden when he managed to wander away from the West Wing’s assisted living facilities.)

President Trump is a rock star, and the funniest thing about this reality is that he’s still producing great hits at seventy-eight years young!  There are a few octogenarian-ish rockers out there who continue to make music as well as anyone working today, but most of the great ones ran their engines a little too hot during their younger days and have long since run out of gas.  Some abused their bodies so much that their skin suits now look like deflated tires.  Then there’s Trump — a man who stays up late, gets up early, and takes a break only for a round of golf.  He has no intention of getting off the stage because every day he’s releasing new live albums!

Today’s chart-topper might be about tariffs.  Tomorrow’s might be about immigration.  The day after that might be about disbanding the IRS.  Next week, there might be a crowd-pleaser about justice coming for Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi, Liz Cheney, or Hillary Clinton.  Next month, he might sing a ballad about the end of NPR and PBS.  You never know what smash hit he’ll drop next! 

That’s why the whole world has to tune in to see what happens.  Russia, Ukraine, China, North Korea, Venezuela, the enslaved colonies of the European Union — every corner of the planet listens intently and wonders whether the American president will single out one of its leaders for a little impromptu duet.  Invariably, after Trump bangs out a few chords and hits a set of drums with his fists, some propagandist posing as a professional reporter looks sternly into the cameras and declares, “I’m here at the White House, and we’re all about to die!”  After some “serious” back-and-forth commentary with the corporate newsroom as to how President Trump will destroy the world today (just as they claimed he would do the day before), the rabid discussion usually breaks away for a batch of pharmaceutical commercials (somebody has to pay the bills!).  

As it turns out, corporate news primarily consists of (1) screaming about President Trump and (2) selling legal drugs.  When you accept that screaming about President Trump is its own kind of self-medication for millions of psychologically unhealthy people, a rational person might conclude that twenty-first century news cartels are really nothing more than roving gangs of drug-dealers!  They got half the world stoned on Trump hate, and withdrawal symptoms are so painful that the afflicted flock to fake news for a quick fix.

Unfortunately for America, the news media cartels have forgotten the first rule of running a successful drug business: Never get hooked on your own product.  Do you think the Fortune 500’s pharmaceutical giants encourage their chief executives to pop opioid tablets in the break room?  Of course not; they need their moneymakers thinking clearly while churning out new dopeheads and flatlining rural America.

Modern journalists show no such restraint: They are most definitely hooked on their drug of choice.  It’s just that most of today’s strung out newsies can’t admit to themselves that they are addicted to Donald Trump.  They tell us he’s about to end the world, but they keep running after him for one more intoxicating hit before everything goes kablooey.  President Trump even tried to detox the AP with a much deserved stint in rehab, but the Associated Propagandists sued the White House for a little more access to their favorite Trump drug.  Come on, guys!  The first step to a successful recovery is admitting you have a problem!

On Saturday, the annual White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner consisted mainly of Trump groupies getting up on a third-rate stage during open mic night to explain that they’re totally not obsessed with Donald Trump!  All evidence to the contrary, groupies!  You make up stories about him.  (Russia collusion, anyone?)  You spread silly gossip about him.  (OMG, did you hear that the president wore a navy suit to the pope’s funeral?  LOL!)  You spend all day, every day writing long articles about his hair, how many Diet Cokes he’s had, how he pronounces Chi-na, and whether he means half the things he’s said.  You rage-tweet about his penchant for commenting on sports, music, and cultural issues, but you also rage-tweet when he hasn’t yet commented on the pop culture issue of the day.  You’re all just a bunch of pouty stalkers who vie for President Trump’s attention!

When normal people break up with someone and cease to care about that person’s opinion, they do not sulk on stage and whine to their ex, “What we are not is the opposition.  What we are not is the enemy of the people.  And what we are not is the enemy of the state.”  Uh, sorry, girlfriend, I’ll be sure to let Donald know.  Maybe I’ll pass him a note at recess that says the press corps is, like, so over him and whatevs.  How very melodramatic of the Fourth Estate!  Let’s be honest: If they didn’t obsess about President Trump 24/7, they’d never sell enough Big Pharma ads to pay for even half an estate.  Sad trombone

For those keeping score at home, real reporter Mollie Hemingway added some narration for Trump’s jilted exes bawling their eyes out during their annual group therapy session: “The propaganda press is, in fact, the enemy of the people.  They maliciously lie and invent stories, such as the Russia collusion hoax and the Kavanaugh smear.  They cover up important true stories, such as the Wuhan virus and the Biden family business.  Enemies.”  And, I might add, so obsessed with President Trump that they should be renamed the Fatal Attraction White House press corps.

Like any rock star destined for the Hall of Fame, Trump puts on a great show.  In recognition of his administration’s many accomplishments during these first hundred days, the White House erected a hundred yard signs on the North Lawn with the mug shots of criminal illegal aliens who have been taken off America’s streets.  If the press corps won’t produce shows describing the dangerous foreign nationals who have invaded the United States and caused Americans great harm, rock star Trump will bring the show to them.  

One MSNBC reporter complained, “What’s particularly noteworthy about this location is it is right directly behind the positions where TV correspondents do their hits from the White House lawn.”  Leave it to a bunch of Trump addicts to complain about having to do “hits” while the president trolls them from his driveway.

The first hundred days of the MAGA reunion tour have been legendary.  President Trump, rock on!



X22, And we Know, and more- May 1st

 


I Can’t Understand My Professor

 


My colleague at Minding the Campus, Jared Gould, has written persuasively on the problem of colleges and universities over-admitting foreign students, who can fill seats that should have gone to American students, drive up costs for everyone, and ultimately take jobs from American workers. 

In my view, however, a more pressing issue—although one that is rarely broached, lest the complainant be labeled “xenophobic”—is that of foreign-born professors, especially those whose command of spoken English is, shall we say, less than optimal.

These days, institutions have come to rely more and more on non-native Ph.D.s. Just scan through the faculty roster at any American university and see how many names you can pronounce. This is a problem for some of the same reasons Jared mentions: Not only did many of these professors take grad-school seats from American students, they eventually took jobs that might have gone to American candidates.

There’s another problem with foreign-born professors, though, on an even more basic level: Students often struggle to understand them in class. If students literally can’t grasp what the professor is saying, due to a language barrier, how can they learn the material? Often, they resort to essentially teaching themselves, using textbooks, study groups, and online aids.

[RELATED: H-1B Visa Undermines American Students and Workers]

The daughter of a good friend is currently in medical school at a large, highly respected Southeastern university. I had a chance to chat with her over the holidays and asked her how it was going. What she said frankly shocked me.

According to her, not a single one of her medical school professors, so far, has been American-born. All speak with thick accents, although some are clearer than others. Asking questions in class doesn’t help much, because she often can’t understand the answers. And she isn’t alone. Her classmates all have the same problem.   

So how are they supposed to learn this information that is presumably so important for doctors to know—information they will be tested over, repeatedly, throughout their years in medical school, culminating in board examinations?

This bright young woman, along with her classmates and many other medical students all over the country, has simply taken matters into her own hands, purchasing expensive software that covers the same material. She attends class religiously each day, then goes home and spends eight or ten more hours watching videos. Despite shelling out tens of thousands of dollars on an “elite” medical school education, she is essentially having to teach herself—all because her professors don’t speak clear English.

This is just one example of what seems to be a widespread problem. In my 40 years of college teaching and advising, I’ve had dozens of students complain to me that they have one or more professors they can’t understand, particularly in mathematics, engineering, and the hard sciences.

[RELATED: ‘Linguistic White Supremacy’: The Left’s New Crusade Against the English Language]

How did we get ourselves into this situation, and how can we get out of it?

The answer to the first question, which also suggests an answer to the second, is that we got here mainly by prioritizing research over teaching—in some cases, by a wide margin. Indeed, some of our most prestigious institutions seem to value research almost exclusively and teaching hardly at all. Almost any tenure-track professor at a Research 1 university will tell you that their annual evaluations and tenure bids are highly focused on research, publishing, and grant procurement, with teaching coming in a distant second, if that. In other words, if a candidate is an accomplished researcher or has the potential to be, schools don’t really care if students can understand them or not.

The simple solution is for institutions to prioritize teaching, or at least make it equal to research. Honestly, most of what passes for “research” these days is either derivative naval-gazing or unreproducible nonsense; only a relative handful of professors are doing truly groundbreaking work in any field. The rest should be expected to teach more and publish less, and be evaluated accordingly. Departments, too, should be judged primarily on how well students learn in their classes, not on how many journal articles they produce or how much grant money they generate.

With a renewed emphasis on teaching, departments might start to care a little more about whether students can actually understand their professors and make that an integral part of the screening process for new faculty. Some institutions already do this, but every candidate for a faculty position should have to give a public presentation that students are encouraged to attend—bribed with food, if necessary—and their opinions solicited.

In that way, perhaps we can eventually move beyond this frankly untenable situation in which even our brightest students sometimes struggle to pick up on important concepts. We might be pleasantly surprised at how much and how fast they learn once they actually understand what their professors are saying.

Follow Rob Jenkins on X.


Cover by Jared Gould using image by Gorodenkoff on Adobe Stock: Asset ID#: 206335426 & thought bubble element by Tupungato on Adobe Stock; Asset ID#: 882086659

Trump and His Team Win When They Lead From the Front


The Trump 2.0 administration is like no other administration ever, and its appointees are leading like in no other administration ever. They’re taking a cue from Donald Trump, and it’s a welcome cue because this administration understands the proper role of its leaders. It’s to lead and to be seen to be leading. It’s not to be doing the detailed work that every administration leader has a giant staff to do. Do you think Donald Trump descends into detailed policy analyses? Do you think he’s writing position papers? Of course not, and it’s not because he’s dumb. He’s not dumb. He’s a very smart guy, and he understands that leadership involves leading; that’s what he’s doing by getting out there every day, talking to the press, communicating, and setting the terms in public. Remember the most notorious presidential micromanager? Jimmy Carter, now merely the second worst president of the last century.

Don’t be like Jimmy Carter. 

People have the idea that the president or the head of a cabinet department is necessarily deep in the weeds, crafting and implementing policies and managing every element of their domain. Sometimes you need that. Sometimes, you need somebody who’s very focused on details. Our Treasury secretary seems to be one of those guys, although he also masterfully handles the public-facing aspect. The public-facing aspect of this revolution that Donald Trump has ignited in his second term is key, and that’s why you see these leaders out there doing interviews, jumping on podcasts, being out there at the cutting edge with subordinates performing their duties. Trump set out his vision (for you military folks, his intent). They are explaining how they are executing it in their domain and, critically, showing that they are doing so. 

“Promises made, promises kept” is this administration’s motto. We have an electorate that has been shamelessly lied to by Democrats, bureaucrats, the regime media, and the Fredocons. The voters trust Trump, but they also demand verification. That’s what Trump 2.0 needs to provide right now. We have a crisis of confidence in our government where people don’t believe it works, so it’s vital that we show it working when we are in charge. That’s why we see cabinet secretaries out there with their folks in the field. Saying “We shut the border down” or “We’re taking weak and woke out of the military” is one thing; showing it is another.

Some people don’t get it. For instance, in a recent interview with one of the gentlemen dismissed from the Pentagon – a Naval Academy graduate who I’ve been told is a great guy and who seemed to be a dedicated patriot when he was talking to Megyn Kelly –complained that Pete Hegseth is out doing physical training with the troops rather than being in his office doing…what? What is Pete Hegseth supposed to be doing in his office? What is Pete Hegseth’s best and highest use? Is it sitting at a comically large desk reading and writing memos all day? No! That does not support his primary mission. His primary mission right now is to bring back our military culture. Until he does that, all the procurement stuff, the policy stuff, and the strategy stuff is meaningless. Until he refocuses our military on killing our enemies rather than on weird commie social pathologies, America’s armed forces are nothing but a cash-guzzling failure machine that spits out maimed and dead soldiers while putting checks in the “L” column.

The highest, best use for Pete Hegseth is issuing clear, brief orders while being the public face of the Pentagon and demonstrating that we’re a killing organization again. SecDef Hegseth is not going to be diving deep into the details of policy. The White House is going to dictate the big policy, and he’s got hundreds, maybe thousands, of people to do the job of filling out the details. Hegseth’s job is to be seen fixing the military and then to sign some things. Yeah, that’s a simplification, but not really. 

What do you think a staff officer (whether military or civilian) does? A staff officer prepares the detailed product for final approval by the commander based on the big picture the commander paints. A commander, which Pete Hegseth is, comes up with a concept and gives guidance. It’s his staff that handles the nitty-gritty and figures out how to implement it. Rember how LBJ was picking bombing targets in North Vietnam; remember how that went? The commander approves the staff product, rejects it, or sends it back for revision. A commander habitually diving into the staff process is a commander who’s going to be presiding over a slow, inefficient organization focused more on process than outcome.

In other words, Trump’s leaders cannot let themselves get sucked into the bureaucratic quicksand. 

Let’s look at how this works at a lower level – the principles of leadership are the same at all levels.  When I was a battalion commander, I think I had two all-hands meetings with all my company commanders and staff officers in two years. Why? Because my job wasn’t to sit in meetings (nor was theirs). My job was to make decisions and ensure they were carried out, which I did by walking around. And it worked. My cavalry squadron rocked because my people were allowed to do their jobs, and I did mine. I don’t think I ever had an all-hands meeting as an acting brigade commander. Why? Because we didn’t need one.

Either the commander commands or his subordinates command for him by default. One common way to undercut a leader is to drown him in paperwork to convince him that he must master the minute details of everything within his command. By doing so, underlings who want to control things themselves effectively neuter their boss. He doesn’t see anything but what they show him. He doesn’t hear anything but what they tell him. And he certainly doesn’t do anything but what they want him to do.

No. You can’t let that happen. And it will happen if you don’t lead with a whip and a chair. “This is what I want. I’m going to do pull-ups with the Rangers. Have it for my signature when I’m done.”

You give your staff enough time to brief you, and then you make decisions. Now, a commander has an obligation to his staff. You owe your people clear and comprehensive decisions so they know what is expected and can provide it to you for final approval. That’s how this works. The idea that Pete Hegseth is doing something wrong by being out there and showing the force that we now care about troops not being fat is crazy. A leader’s example is invaluable. What is the value of Pete Hegseth sitting at his desk deep in the bowels of the Pentagon, reading a detailed paper on how we’re rebuilding our shipbuilding capacity? He doesn’t know anything about shipbuilding capacity. Nobody knows anything about shipbuilding capacity except the guys who wrote the paper about shipbuilding capacity, and they may not know anything about it either, judging by our shameful recent performance. He needs a clear, concise staff product that allows him to make a quick, smart decision on how to proceed, and then he can go outside and be filmed doing push-ups with the Marines because that’s what will make more people reenlist in the Marines.

It’s great how other secretaries are out there showing the flag for the administration, too. Kristi Noem is everywhere, reminding people that if you’re an illegal alien, you need to get the hell out of our country. What value would she have sitting in an office reviewing memos? None. Of course, there were some missteps – she looked a little awkward holding that rifle with those two studly federal officers, but her point was clear. Our federal officers are badasses, and they’re going to haul you back to your Third World hellhole unless you go voluntarily. That’s the message we need to send, and that’s the message she’s sending.

And, of course, Donald Trump is the master of this kind of leadership. I know people who have worked, or do work, with him closely. He’s thoughtful, focused, and smart, but he’s not going to do the jobs of the people working for him. Fortunately, this time, he was able to leverage his first-term experience and bring in people who know what the heck they’re doing and how to get stuff done. He expects and lets his people do their jobs. Again, it’s never going to be perfect. People are going to screw up. You’re going to have turf wars. You’re going to have people say dumb things. Some folks are going to leak for personal advantage, but no one can seriously argue that the difference between Trump 1.0 and Trump 2.0 are anything less than night and day. 

The last hundred days have been incredible. His people know what they’re doing, and his people are doing their jobs. And Donald Trump, like his appointees, is doing his. He’s out there showing the way, leading from the front – which is exactly where a leader needs to be.



Democrat Weirdo Introduces Articles of Impeachment Against Trump


One thing about working in politics is you can forget just how many people there are in Congress, and you also forget that a lot of them are weirdos and oddballs. You see a handful of Members of the House and Senate on TV, maybe like 10, but there are 535 of them, and some of them are so odd or creepy or strange that you have to assume they had to have been running against a sexually abused tube sock when meet them or see them on TV. Michigan Congressman Shri Thanedar is one such person.

I’d never heard of this guy before a video of him discussing the articles of impeachment he’d introduced against President Trump went viral. He represents a district I lived in and around from birth till graduating college and I’d never heard of him. Then I looked it up and saw he’d only moved to the state in the not-too-distant past and “won” is seat because he’d made a fortune off chemicals and, apparently, torturing animals.

I don’t know if his hair is real or if it’s what was shaved off some of his victims glued to the top of this dome, but I don’t really care either. The under-bite mutant with a penchant for hoping living creatures starve to death won a gerrymandered district with 68.6 percent of the vote. If you were looking for the “King of the Morons,” they just elected him.

What, in the eyes of this probable carpeted cranium progressive, did Donald Trump do to deserve to be impeached? Well, he allegedly did 7 things.

First, “Obstruction of Justice and Abuse of Executive Power: Including denial of due process, unlawful deportations, defiance of court orders, and misuse of the Department of Justice.” The “denial of due process” is about Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the illegal alien gang member deported to his home of El Salvador after more than a dozen appearances before immigration judges and 2 separate deportation orders. 

It's unclear was Shri thinks of a “due process,” but it’s not what a normal person would. Thanedar is fighting to hard for Kilmar you’d think he was the only person who could tell him where the dentist who botched his braces lives…and he wants his revenge. 

Next comes, “Usurpation of Appropriations Power: For dismantling congressionally established agencies and impounding federal funds.” The is code for “fighting waste, fraud and abuse.” Democrats hate that.

Then we have, “Abuse of Trade Powers and International Aggression: Including imposing economically damaging tariffs and threatening military invasion against sovereign nations.” Making jokes about Canada is now a crime? My whole childhood in Detroit was a felony, I guess.

Number 4 is, “Violation of First Amendment Rights: Through retaliatory actions against critics, media, and attorneys exercising constitutionally protected speech.” I missed a memo, apparently. Is Shri trying to say the President of the United States can’t say mean things back to people who say mean things to him? Could he be that stupid? Don’t answer that.

Shri’s next article is, “Creation of an Unlawful Office: By establishing the Department of Government Efficiency (“DOGE”) and unlawfully empowering Elon Musk to unilaterally violate the Constitution.” Never having heard of this guy, it’s quite possible he has done literally nothing as a Member of Congress and, therefore, doesn’t understand how government works. But Presidents are allowed to hire advisors to help them root out corruption in government. Maybe that hits too close to home for the 70-year-old Saturday Night Live character, but it’s a true story.

Then comes, “Bribery and Corruption: Involving dismissing criminal cases, soliciting foreign emoluments, and extortionate settlements for personal and political gain.” In typical liberal fashion, Shri simply declares something to be without offering any proof. It’s like he’s bucking for a gig on MSNBC-13 or something. Hell, maybe he’ll get one once Rachel Maddow dials back her rigorous 5 day work week to a more manageable Monday only schedule she’s paid $25 million a year for.

Finally, it’s, “Tyrannical Overreach: Seeking to consolidate unchecked power, erode civil liberties, and defy constitutional limits on presidential authority.” What’s the point of consolidating “checked power”? 

This idiot is the Democrat Party in 2025, even if most of them have better hair and teeth. Though not by much.

But the ultimate question remains: How the hell did these people get elected to anything? Next time, do yourself a favor and vote for the sexually abused tube sock.



🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Mass Immigration Without Assimilation Is A Recipe For National Suicide

If we don’t insist on the total assimilation and Americanization of our immigrants, we’ll cease to be America and become something else.



If you want to know what mass immigration without assimilation produces in a country, look no further than Scotland. Immigrants from Pakistan now constitute an ethno-religious voting bloc in that country with their very own politicians advocating for nakedly sectarian interests. 

Recently, a video clip from 2022 resurfaced on social media of Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar standing in front of the flag of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan claiming that “change is coming” and forthrightly calling for ethnic and Muslim sectarianism in Scottish politics. Sarwar doesn’t mince words: He wants his people to take control of every level of government in Scotland.

“We will only truly get real power, not if we just have more Pakistanis sitting in council chambers and parliaments, but actually having more Pakistanis and South Asians sitting in the corridors of power making the decisions,” said Sarwar.

He went on to declare that the days where “our South Asian community are viewed as a vote bank or a curry bank are well and truly gone. The days where South Asian communities get to lead political parties and get to lead countries is now upon us. The days when South Asian communities get to decide not just at which school our children go to but what they are taught in those schools, is also coming.”

There’s a lot to unpack in his statement. No mention of the Scottish people, or Britain, or any shared national interests or a common good. It was simply an assertion of raw power for his ethnic and religious group over and against all others. It was a call to take over institutions.

Notice, too, the identitarian language. When Sarwar says that the time has come for “South Asian communities” (a euphemism for Pakistani Muslim immigrants) to “lead countries,” he doesn’t mean lead countries in South Asia. He means the time has come for Pakistani Muslims to lead the countries they have culturally and politically colonized through mass immigration — in this case, Scotland and England. 

This is sobering stuff, and the main takeaway is that multiculturalism has produced a particularly toxic form of ethno-religious factionalism in Britain that will eventually tear the country apart. Sarwar and his people intend to take over Scotland, and if they can, all of Britain. They are being forthright about it. The vision they have for Britain is shaped primarily by the Islamic religion and Pakistani culture. It is incompatible with and essentially hostile towards British civilization, and Sarwar knows it.

What’s happening in Scotland and England should serve as a cautionary tale for America. Despite what the left claims, multiculturalism doesn’t produce “strength through diversity,” or a common civic culture of shared interests, or any other such platitudes. It produces what we see in Britain and much of Europe: an aggressive species of identity politics which, under conditions of mass immigration from non-western societies, ends up importing entire communities whose customs and way of life are inimical to that of the host country.

For example, when someone like Sarwar talks about the “South Asian community” getting to decide what’s taught in Scottish schools, what he means is that Muslim immigrants from Pakistan will soon get to decide the curriculum — not just for their children but for all schoolchildren in Scotland.

Once they have that power, does anyone seriously think they will refrain from imposing an Islamist agenda, not just in schools but in society at large? Of course they won’t. Sarwar’s own father, Mohammed Sarwar, the first Muslim MP elected in the United Kingdom, gave up his UK citizenship in 2013 to go back to Pakistan and become governor of Punjab. He later called for Islamic blasphemy laws to be promulgated through the United Nations and the European Union.

Despite his stint in the British Parliament, the senior Sarwar never really assimilated to the West. In that, he was typical of his immigrant “community” in Britain: He was never really British. He was always first and foremost a Pakistani Muslim, and hence had no problem using the West’s liberalism to call for the imposition of Islamic dhimmitude and the destruction of liberal society in the West. Multiculturalism allows for this sort of thing, after all, under the misguided notion that diversity and tolerance of imported cultures must be limitless.

But tolerating this kind of foreign sectarianism is national suicide, as anyone can easily observe in Scotland and England, which are now on a probably irreversible trajectory toward civil war. We in America should pay attention because the same thing is happening here, albeit on a smaller scale. Parts of Michigan, for example, now have such concentrations of unassimilated Muslim immigrants that scenes like this have become a commonplace — mass demonstrations of Muslim identity that are fundamentally alien to our American way of life. We saw plenty of that in the pro-Hamas demonstrations that arose immediately after the Oct. 7, 2023 attack on Israel, and we will keep seeing it as these unassimilated immigrant communities grow and ethno-religious sectarianism becomes a normal part of political life in America.

Democrats, for their part, have embraced this sort of sectarianism. Some, like Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, do so openly. Omar very clearly puts her Somali ethnicity first and sees her job in Congress as representing the interests of Somali and its people, whether in Minnesota or East Africa.

Or consider Rep. Joaquin Castro of Texas, who issued a statement Monday in response to a simple executive order from the Trump White House that all truck drivers must speak English. This, said Castro, was a “targeted attack on the Spanish-speaking community,” and would “lead to more racial profiling and prevent hard-working Americans from participating in our economy and transportation industry.”

Embedded in this way of speaking is the idea that any requirement that “hard-working Americas” speak English is somehow an “attack” on them, as if even having a national official language in America is itself racist or bigoted.

We have to reject this with all our strength and insist on what the Scots and English have not insisted on: a national identity that immigrants are obliged to adopt if they want to become part of our country. If we fail to do that, we’ll wake up and find ourselves in the position of Scotland, where the leader of a major political party feels free to push ethno-religious sectarianism while the liberal mainstream nods along, oblivious to their own impending destruction.



Stellantis Gets Tariff Relief From President Trump While They Move All P...

In todays video I talk about Stellantis getting Tariff relief by promising to move all production to the United States, from parts to assembly.
Chairman John Elkann agreeing to move the production from Canada and Mexico to the United States will give Stellantis limited tariff relief while they make the move, and will give the company massive tax relief, the president talks about this and more in today’s video.
Let’s talk about this in the comments

9 Changes New Prime Minister Will Bring To Canada

9 Changes New Prime Minister Will Bring To Canada

Image for article: 9 Changes New Prime Minister Will Bring To Canada

Mark Carney defeated conservative challenger Pierre Poilievre in Canada's 2025 federal election to become the next Prime Minister of America's 51st state. What exactly does he have planned for The Great White North?

Nine improvements Carney is bringing to a Canada near you:

  1. Assisted suicide is now available at Tim Hortons: Americans will be so jealous of the convenience enjoyed by Canada's citizens. 

  2. All parents will be required to trans their kids: All must follow the example of our Dear Leader Mark Carney.

  3. Double the size of Canada's military to 12: It's important for Canada to be ready in case Trump attacks.

  4. The means of maple syrup production will be seized for the proletariat: A classless society can only be established by the equitable redistribution of maple syrup reserves. Glory to the Communist Republic of Canada. 

  5. Change the national anthem to "The Lumberjack Song" by Monty Python: Much more appropriate for modern Canadians.

  6. Establish a war victory monument in case Canada ever wins a war: You never know. It could happen someday.

  7. More unnecessary "u"s will be added to words: In addition to "humour" and "colour," we'll also get "elevatour," "authour," and "dictatour."

  8. Will advance several exciting new hoaxes against the Catholic Church: It's the least we can do for the indigenous peoples who came before. 

  9. Will work closely with President Xi to bring Canada under the watchful protection of the glorious People's Republic of China: Having a big brother is so comforting.

Wow! These are exciting. Maybe Canada is finally back. What changes are you most excited for? Let us know in the comments.


Timeline on Jared Kushner, Qatar, 666 Fifth Avenue, and White House Policy

 The heart of the case involving President Donald J. Trump and Ukraine was the claim that the president pressured a U.S. ally, weakening the security of that country, to extract a personal benefit for himself.


 Several commentators have said that the president’s action toward Ukraine fit a pattern of his calling on foreign governments to interfere in US elections. But does it also fit a pattern of trading off the security interests of the United States and foreign partners for personal benefit to himself and his family? We don’t answer that question here. We instead provide a timeline of events surrounding an earlier incident at the Trump White House involving Qatar and the Kushner Companies. We leave it to readers and further investigation to reach any conclusions — whether this was a shakedown of a foreign partner motivated or clouded by personal financial interests or something quite innocent. At a minimum, we believe it raises important questions and concerns that deserve further scrutiny.

When the Kushner Companies purchased 666 Fifth Avenue in midtown Manhattan in early 2007 for a record-breaking price of $1.8 billion, it was supposed to be a center of their real estate portfolio. Instead, the Kushners have struggled to cover their debt on the troubled building since shortly after its purchase on the eve of the financial crisis. As Jared Kushner’s father-in-law, Donald J. Trump, was running for President, the Kushners were pitching Qatari investors to help bail out the building. And just weeks after his father Charles reportedly failed to reach a deal with Qatar’s minister of finance, Jared Kushner, in his capacity as a senior adviser to President Trump, reportedly played a central role in supporting a blockade of Qatar by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Kushner never disclosed his meeting with Saudi Arabia and the UAE on the blockade to Secretary of State Rex Tillerson at the time. Later, a financial company tied to Qatar brokered an especially valuable deal to rescue the Kushner Companies’ property at 666 Fifth Avenue.

The following is a timeline of events related to the Kushners’ pursuit of funding from Qatar for 666 Fifth Avenue and the Trump-Kushner support for the Saudi-UAE blockade of Qatar. 

The timeline will be updated as new information becomes available. We invite readers to email us any information we may be missing by sending suggestions to lte@justsecurity.org, whether favorable or unfavorable to President Trump and Jared Kushner. Our goal is to provide an objective, full description of the publicly available record. 

Significant credit is due to Mohamad Bazzi who provided a detailed account of several of these activities in an opinion piece for The Guardian in July 2019.

January 2007: Kushner Companies purchases 666 Fifth Avenue for record price on eve of financial crisis

The Kushner Companies purchases, at Jared Kushner’s urging, 666 Fifth Avenue, an office tower in Midtown Manhattan, for $1.8 billion at the height of the real estate market. They invest $500 million, and cover the remaining amount with debt. Even before the financial crisis hits, there are signs that they paid too high a price and took on too much debt for the purchase. It was, at the time, the highest purchase price ever paid for a New York office tower.

2007 – 2008: Global financial crisis and early troubles for 666 Fifth Avenue

As the global financial crisis unfolds, Citigroup announces in December 2007 that it will not renew its lease on about 75,000 square feet of space in 666 Fifth Avenue. In 2008, the Kushners sell a 49 percent stake in the building’s retail space to the Carlyle Group and Crown Acquisitions for $525 million, using part of the proceeds to cover debt on the building.

2010: Kushners’ financial troubles with 666 Fifth Avenue

Kushner Companies’ $1.2 billion loan on 666 Fifth Avenue is transferred to a special servicer to try to restructure the debt after the Kushners reported difficulties in paying the loan. The building is appraised at $820 million, less than half of what the Kushners paid for it in 2007 and less than the debt they owe to banks. 

2011

The Kushners sell nearly 50% of the building’s office space to Vornado as part of a refinancing deal on the loan for the building. 

2015-2016 and transition to White House: The Kushners negotiate with Qataris

In June 2015, Donald J. Trump formally announces his candidacy for President of the United States.

Throughout 2015 and 2016, Jared and Charles Kushner negotiate with Qatari investor Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim al-Thani (known as “HBJ”) to refinance the building. HBJ is a former Prime Minister of Qatar who manages the country’s $250 billion sovereign wealth fund. One of the meetings Kushner reportedly holds with HBJ is in Trump Tower during the transition in December 2016. He agrees to invest at least $500 million. The deal ultimately falls through when the Kushners fail to raise the rest of the funding from other sources, and the potential investors reportedly worry about public scrutiny from Kushner’s role in the Trump White House. 

Tom Barrack told the Washington Post that he tried to use his Qatar connection to help Kushner with 666 Fifth Avenue. “Barrack said he told the former prime minister of Qatar to consider investing in the Kushner Cos. property,” according to the Post. In a subsequent Post story, Barrack says that Kushner’s move to the White House, “just about completely chilled the market, and [potential investors] just said, ‘No way — can’t be associated with any appearances of conflict of interest,’ even though there was none.” 

(Note: Barrack says it was the perceived conflict of interest that dissuaded these investors, yet they do, in fact, subsequently invest.)

Note: Steve Bannon’s FBI interview (Feb. 12, 2018): 

Bannon reviewed a document Bates stamped SB_00003977 and said the second bullet point was not true. The bullet point said: ‘During transition you had an IT guy do email search of trump servers and discovered Jared met with Anbang and Qataris to raise money for 666 Fifth. You viewed the email that connected the dots. Those meetings left Jared exposed to Comey’” (Steve Bannon FBI 302, p. 166).  Anbang Insurance Group has close ties to the Chinese government. (See March 2017 entry below for evidence of Kushner negotiations with Anbang to raise funds for 666 Fifth Avenue.)  

Late October, early November 2016: Saudis reach out

A week before the election, candidate Trump meets with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at Trump’s private residence, according to Rick Gates’ FBI proffer (p. 99).

Kushner is the main point of contact for foreign governments during the campaign. 

  • According to Gates, “Kushner and Sessions were designated to deal with any requests by foreign officials to the campaign. This decision was made fairly early on as a result of request from Papadopoulos in or around April 2016 about requests from foreign officials. This request was made to Manafort. Manafort and Kushner then made the decision to designate Kushner and Sessions to deal with this.”  (Gates FBI proffer, p.99)
  • “One of Kushner’s main responsibilities was to have relationships with foreign governments, while Priebus coordinated everyone’ s efforts.” (Gates FBI proffer, p.145)

Post election: Saudi assessment of Trump-Kushner team

Soon after the election, Prince Mohammad Bin Salman sends a delegation of Saudi officials to meet with Kushner and other Trump advisers. They subsequently write an unflattering assessment that later leaks. It says that Trump’s “inner circle is predominantly deal makers who lack familiarity with political customs and deep institutions, and they support Jared Kushner.” The Saudi delegation “brought back a report identifying Mr. Kushner as a crucial focal point in the courtship of the new administration,” according to the New York Times. “He brought to the job scant knowledge about the region, a transactional mind-set and an intense focus on reaching a deal with the Palestinians that met Israel’s demands, the delegation noted.”

January 2017: Jared Kushner officially joins the Trump Administration

Jared Kushner joins the Trump administration as a senior adviser, and formally resigns as chief executive of Kushner Companies. He sells some assets to a family trust, including his stake in 666 Fifth Avenue. However, he retains the vast majority of his interest in the Kushner Companies, and transfers a small portion of his stake in the company to a trust overseen by his mother. He maintains real estate and other holdings worth around $800 million

From early 2017 onward: Kushner-MBS private communications

Since the early months of the administration, senior officials were worried about Jared Kushner’s having private, informal conversations with Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Salman, a practice he continued even after Chief of Staff John Kelly imposed new protocols, according to the New York Times (December 2018 report). “The private exchanges could make him susceptible to Saudi manipulation, said three former senior American officials,” according to the Times. “There was a risk the Saudis were playing him,” one former White House official said. Intelligence briefers told Kelly that virtually all of the conversations that U.S. officials had with the Saudis on sensitive policy matter had been between Kushner and MBS, according to the Washington Post. “Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and national security adviser H.R. McMaster expressed early concern that Kushner was freelancing U.S. foreign policy. … McMaster was concerned there were no official records kept of what was said on the calls,” the Post reported. McMaster also “learned that Kushner had contacts with foreign officials that he did not coordinate through the National Security Council or officially report,” according to another Post report.

[Note: See entries on December 2017, February 2018, and May 2018 concerning Kushner’s security clearances.]

March 2017: The Kushners negotiate with Chinese financers 

After financial talks between the Kushners and the Chinese conglomerate Anbang Insurance Group, which has close ties to the Chinese government, become public, Democratic lawmakers raise concerns to the White House Counsel and Treasury Secretary that a deal could violate federal ethics regulations. Several days later, negotiations end without a deal to finance the building. 

April 2017: The Kushners directly approach Qatari government for financing

Charles Kushner and associates meet with Qatari Finance Minister Sharif Al Emadi and aides in New York to seek investment in 666 Fifth Avenue from Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund. No deal is reached. 

Following a report by The Intercept on March 2, 2018 on the meeting, a spokeswoman for Kushner Companies, Chris Taylor, denied that such negotiations occured, stating: “To be clear, we did not meet with anyone from the Qatari government to solicit sovereign funds for any of our projects […] To suggest otherwise is inaccurate and false” (Newsweek, March 2, 2018)

Two weeks later, Kushner Companies acknowledged the meeting. Charles Kushner told the Washington Post that he refused the proposal to avoid a conflict of interest for his son. 

Note: In his interview with the Washington Post, Charles Kushner also referred to not taking funds directly from Qatar specifically through a sovereign wealth fund. He told the Post: “Before the meeting, Kushner Companies had decided that it was not going to accept sovereign wealth fund investments. We informed the Qatar representatives of our decision and they agreed. Even if they were there ready to wire the money, we would not have taken it.” The Post reports that, on the contrary, according to Tom Barrack, Charles Kushner was “crushed” when the earlier deal with Qatar on 666 Fifth Avenue fell through during the presidential transition.

Charles Kushner later told CNN that he accepted the invitation to the meeting only “out of respect” for the Qataris and to tell them there was no way “we could do business.” He also said taking the meeting was “stupid,” given how it might be perceived publicly. (CNN, April 25, 2018).

Dexter Filkins reported that Charles Kushner’s explanation was false, according to a financial analyst with knowledge of the meeting:

Kushner pitched a huge renovation of the property, which included bringing in retail stores and converting offices to residences, and hosted a follow-up meeting the next day at 666 Fifth Avenue. “He asked for just under a billion dollars,” [the financial analyst] told me. The Qataris declined, citing dubious business logic. “They could have bought the building—believe me, they have the money,” the analyst said. “They just didn’t think it would ever pay off.” The analyst worried that refusing the deal had a political cost. “Here’s a question for you: If they had given Kushner the money, would there have been a blockade? I don’t think so.” 

CNN’s Vicky Ward corroborated Filkins’ account citing a person who was in the meeting.

May 20, 2017: Kushner’s “Shadow” Meeting Prior to Blockade of Qatar

President Trump makes his first foreign trip to Saudi Arabia, including in the delegation  Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Jared Kushner, and Steve Bannon. During the trip, Kushner and Bannon meet for a private dinner with top leaders of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, who lay out their plan to impose a blockade on Qatar. Secretary Rex Tillerson is neither present for the meeting, nor informed of the meeting. He never learns of the meeting during his time in office (he departed in March 2018). After leaving office, Tillerson testifies before the House Foreign Affairs Committee and says it makes him “angry” to learn of Kushner’s meeting:

Q: A couple of weeks later on May 20th, 2017, you were in Riyadh with the President in advance of the Middle East summit. And you again gave public remarks with the Saudi Foreign Minister. […]
So that same night as we understand it, so on or about May 20th, 2017, there was apparently a private dinner that was hosted between Steve Bannon, Jared Kushner, and the rulers of Saudi Arabia and UAE, respectively. Were you aware of that dinner?
A
: No.
[…]
Q: Okay. What’s your reaction to a meeting of that sort having taken place without your knowledge?
A: It makes me angry.
Q
: Why is that?
A: Because I didn’t have a say. The State Department’s views were never expressed.

– Tillerson Interview Transcript (May 21, 2019), p. 84-85.

A White House spokesperson, Hogan Gidley issues a denial saying, “Jared consistently follows proper protocols” with the National Security Council and State Department, the “alleged ‘dinner’ to supposedly discuss the blockade never happened,” and no one in the White House was “involved in the blockade.”

June 1, 2017: Congressional concerns raised about Kushner’s links to EB-5 visas for Kushner Companies including for 666 Fifth Avenue 

On June 1, 2017, Democratic members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees write to the Kushner Companies, seeking answers on their use of EB-5 foreign investor visas “especially in light of Jared Kushner’s role in the Trump administration and the potential for conflicts of interest” and that the Kushner Companies “may be seeking to benefit from the Kushner family’s connections to the White House.”

June 5, 2017: Blockade of Qatar begins 

Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt and Bahrain sever diplomatic and economic relations with Qatar. They accuse Qatar of financing terrorism, supporting Islamist groups, and undermining efforts to isolate Iran. They impose a land, sea, and air blockade on Qatar.

Secretary of State Tillerson and Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis are both caught by surprise by the blockade, according to Tillerson’s testimony before Congress (p. 92). Tillerson and Mattis both publicly call for calm to deescalate the situation. (See also Dexter Filkins’ reporting.)

In a shock to Qatar, Trump initially expresses support for the blockade, in contradiction to the official U.S. government position of neutrality. 

Kushner supported the blockade, according to Tillerson’s testimony. “He was more of a view that he thought the blockading countries had, you know, had good reason to do what they were doing,” Tillerson says. Similarly, CNN’s Vicky Ward reports in her book Kushner, Inc.:

Another Tillerson aide told me, “The Saudis would not have risked moving forward without permission from somebody. Now, if you … get a phone call that says, ‘Hey, we’re thinking about doing this,’ you might not have the experience and the capability and the maturity to know how hard to push back. Part of the issue is if you put yourself in as the point of contact and you’re not actually capable of being the point of contact.” This person concluded, “That person must have been Jared.” Until now, Kushner’s dalliances in world affairs had been ethically questionable. With Qatar, Tillerson believed they had become alarming. Threatening Qatar, with the U.S. presence at its air base, was tantamount to threatening the U.S. “Qatar was when [Kushner’s interference] became dangerous for the United States,” said a Tillerson confidant.

Ward also refers to Kushner having “greenlit” the blockade of Qatar, in a piece for The Guardian.

Important note: The Qataris reportedly believe the blockade may be linked to their rejection of funding for 666 Fifth Avenue. “Some top Qatari government officials believe the White House’s position on the blockade may have been a form of retaliation driven by Kushner who was sour about the failed deal, according to multiple people familiar with the matter,” NBC News reported

See also CNN’s Vicky Ward and author of Kushner, Inc.:

Jun 9, 2017: Tillerson calls for immediate ease on blockade, Trump undercuts him

In a brief, formal statement at the Department of State, Sec. Tillerson calls on the Saudi-led bloc to immediately ease their blockade of Qatar, and less than an hour later Trump undercuts him. 

A US official tells the New York Times “that two had spoken immediately before Tillerson’s State Department remarks, which the secretary read over the telephone to the president.”

Sec. Tillerson states:

We call on the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Egypt to ease the blockade against Qatar. There are humanitarian consequences to this blockade. We’re seeing shortages of food. Families are being forcibly separated, and children pulled out of school. We believe these are unintended consequences, especially during this holy month of Ramadan, but they can be addressed immediately. The blockade is also impairing U.S. and other international business activities in the region. … The blockade is hindering U.S. military actions in the region and the campaign against ISIS.

Within an hour, the president says that the Saudi-led action against is “hard but necessary” and claims that Tillerson supports this stance. President Trump states:

The nation of Qatar, unfortunately, has historically been a funder of terrorism at a very high level, and in the wake of that conference, nations came together and spoke to me about confronting Qatar over its behavior.  So we had a decision to make: Do we take the easy road, or do we finally take a hard but necessary action? We have to stop the funding of terrorism. I decided, along with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, our great generals and military people, the time had come to call on Qatar to end its funding — they have to end that funding — and its extremist ideology in terms of funding.

Tillerson reportedly later came to believe concluded that Trump’s White House remarks were written by Yousef al-Otaiba, UAE ambassador to the U.S., and passed to the President by Jared Kushner. “Rex put two-and-two together,” a close associate of Tillerson told the American Conservative, “and concluded that this absolutely vacuous kid was running a second foreign policy out of the White House family quarters. Otaiba weighed in with Jared and Jared weighed in with Trump. What a mess.”

Al-Otaiba and Kushner are known to be friends, having been introduced to each other by Tom Barrack in May 2016. “You will love him and he agrees with our agenda!” Barrack wrote in a May 2016 email to Otaiba. Politico reported in February 2017 that Kushner was “in almost constant phone and email contact with Otaiba.” Otaiba wrote to Barrack in the first months of Trump’s presidency. “I am in constant contact with Jared and that has been extremely helpful.”

August 18, 2017

On Aug. 18, 2017, Steve Bannon leaves the Trump administration.

August 24, 2017

On Aug. 24, 2017, Qatar announces that it is restoring full diplomatic relations with Iran.

October 2017

Bloomberg News reports, “The [666 Fifth Ave.] tower’s cash flow is enough to cover only about half of the debt payments on the building, down from 66 percent last year.”

October 2017: Kushner surprise trip to Saudi Arabia

Kushner and a senior aide travel to Saudi Arabia to meet Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Kushner “flew commercial, and the White House only announced the visit once he was already on the ground,” the Washington Post reports. Some intelligence officials were caught off guard by Kushner’s trip, and “most people in the White House were kept out of the loop about the trip and its purpose … Intelligence officials were troubled by a lack of information about the topics discussed,” according to a later Post report.

November 2017: Kushner Companies receive loan from Qatar-supported company for Chicago property

The Kushners receive a $184 million loan from Apollo Global Management to refinance a building in Chicago. The Qatar Investment Authority is one of Apollo’s largest investors. The loan is triple the average property loan made by Apollo.

The deal with Apollo, along with an additional $325 million loan to the Kushners from Citibank in Spring 2017, concluded after a White House meeting between Kushner and chief executive, Michael L. Corbat, later spark an investigation by the Office of Government Ethics and a review by the White House Counsel. 

Peter Mirijanian, a spokesperson for Kushner’s attorney Abbe Lowell, said in a statement that Kushner “has had no role in the Kushner Companies since joining the government and has taken no part of any business, loans, or projects with or for the Companies after that.”

December 2017: Congress raises questions on foreign financing of 666 Fifth Ave.

Several Democratic lawmakers send a letter to Jared Kushner, asking if he has discussed financing for 666 Fifth Avenue with foreign nationals or entities while serving in the administration. The letter states, “We are concerned that you may be leveraging your White House position to seek financial assistance for 666 Fifth Avenue.” They also raise questions about Jared Kushner’s surprise trip to Saudi Arabia in October 2017, when he met with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. 

The letter also quotes a Newsweek report connecting the 666 Fifth Avenue situation to Kushner’s security clearance: “Very recently, Newsweek reported: ‘Experts say his stake in the Fifth Avenue building alone is more than enough to cause a suspension of an interim security clearance, as some believe he could use his position in the White House to bail out his family’s investment.’” 

January-February 2018: Qatar’s reported intel on Kushner coordination with Saudi bloc

“Qatari government officials visiting the U.S. in late January and early February considered turning over to Mueller what they believe is evidence of efforts by their country’s Persian Gulf neighbors in coordination with Kushner to hurt their country,” NBC reports relying on four sources. Qatar decided not to pursue it out of concern it would undercut their relations with the White House. 

February 2018: Kushner loses top security clearance

In mid-February, Kushner’s interim security clearance is reportedly reduced from top secret to secret. 

On Feb. 27, 2018, the Washington Post reports that officials in at least four countries – including the UAE and China – have discussed ways to manipulate Jared Kushner, including through his business arrangements, financial difficulties, and inexperience in foreign policy. The Post also reports that in the view of White House officials, “Kushner’s lack of government experience and his business debt were seen from the beginning of his tenure as potential points of leverage that foreign governments could use to influence him.”

March 2018: Tillerson is out; Saudi Crown Prince tours U.S.

Senator Richard Blumenthal calls for an investigation by the Office of Government Ethics into Kushner’s conduct related to the Apollo and Citibank loans.

Rex Tillerson is ousted as Secretary of State. Trump names Mike Pompeo as replacement. 

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman conducts a multi-city visit to the United States. On March 20, he meets with President Trump in the Oval Office. 

April 2018: Pompeo calls for end of blockade

After President Trump had initially expressed support for the blockade of Qatar, Secretary of State Pompeo tells the Saudis that it is time to end the blockade, almost a year after it began.

May 2018: The Kushners negotiate Qatari financing

Kushner Companies negotiate a bailout deal for 666 Fifth Avenue with Brookfield Asset Management and the Qatari sovereign wealth fund.

May 2018: Trump restores Kushner’s top-secret clearance

President Trump orders his chief of staff, John Kelly, to restore Kushner’s top-secret security clearance, which had been stripped in February. The president’s order is over the objections of U.S. intelligence and White House officials. Both Chief of Staff Kelly and White House Counsel McGahn write contemporaneous notes memorializing their concerns. Trump’s involvement in the process contradicts the president’s denial of any such role to the New York Times as well as public denials by Ivanka Trump and Kushner’s lawyer, Abbe D. Lowell. Commentators observe subtle changes in Lowell’s denial of the allegations over time (here and here).

June 21, 2018: Kushner flies to Qatar to hold intergovernmental meetings

An official U.S. readout of the trip is here.

August 1-3, 2018: The Kushners receive bailout on 666 Fifth Avenue from Qatar-supported company (plus Westinghouse deal)

On Aug. 3, the Kushners reach a deal to bailout 666 Fifth Avenue through a 99-year lease to Brookfield Asset Management for about $1.1 billion in rent for the entire 99-year term paid upfront, easing their financial troubles by allowing them to pay off most of what they owe lenders on the building. The Qatar Investment Authority is the second-largest investor in Brookfield.

Qatar Investment Authority later insists that it had “absolutely no involvement in the 666 Fifth Avenue development.”

  • “Both Brookfield and the Qatar Investment Authority, the sovereign fund of the oil-rich Middle Eastern emirate, said the Investment Authority had no knowledge of the deal. A spokesman for the Investment Authority said the fund ‘has no involvement whatsoever in this deal.’” (NYTimes, May 17, 2018)
  • “Brookfield has said that the Qataris had no knowledge of the deal before its public announcement.”  (NYTimes, Aug 3, 2018)

Two days earlier, on Aug. 1, Brookfield closed a deal to acquire 100% of Westinghouse Electric Company. In Feb. 2019, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform releases an interim staff report, based on whistleblower revelations, raising grave concerns over the Trump Administration’s efforts to transfer sensitive nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia without congressional review. The report notes that Westinghouse, which builds nuclear reactors, stands to benefit greatly from such a deal, and that Jared Kushner has been centrally involved. A July 2019, second interim staff report states that:

  • “[W]ith regard to Saudi Arabia, the Trump Administration has virtually obliterated the lines normally separating government policymaking from corporate and foreign interests. The documents show the Administration’s willingness to let private parties with close ties to the President wield outsized influence over U.S. policy towards Saudi Arabia. These new documents raise serious questions about whether the White House is willing to place the potential profits of the President’s friends above the national security of the American people and the universal objective of preventing the spread of nuclear weapons.” 

November 2018

In order to finance its over $1 billion deal on 666 Fifth Avenue, Brookfield receives a $300 million-plus mezzanine loan from Apollo Global Management, a private equity company with ties to Qatar that had previously loaned $184 million to the Kushners in November 2017.

January 2019

Sparked by reports that the White House overruled career officials in order to restore Jared Kushner’s security clearance, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform launches an investigation into the White House security clearance process. In an interview with Committee staff in March, 2019, White House employee Tricia Newbold, who came forward as a whistleblower, described a “Senior White House Official 1” – reportedly Jared Kushner – as having “significant disqualifying factors,” for a security clearance, “including foreign influence, outside activities (‘employment outside or businesses external to what your position at the EOP entails’), and personal conduct.” She testified that this determination by her and the first-line was overruled by Carl Kline, Director of the Personnel Division, without Kline addressing all the disqualifying concerns or recording his reasons in the file. In testimony to the Committee in May, 2019, Kline denied being pressured to grant Kushner’s clearance. White House officials Crede Bailey and Cory Louie also later testified that they did not feel pressured to grant the clearances. Newbold also reported that another agency later had “serious concerns” after Kushner applied for a higher level of clearance.

February 2019 

The Kushner Companies’ original $1.4 billion in loan payments for 666 Fifth Avenue is due. 

Reuters reports that the 666 Fifth Avenue deal in August 2018, in which Qatar “unwittingly” played a role as an investor in Brookfield, has prompted Qatar to rethink its investment strategy.

March 2019

Axios reports that House Democrats are considering an investigation into the Kushner’s August 2018 deal with Brookfield that bailed out 666 Fifth Avenue.

https://www.justsecurity.org/69094/timeline-on-jared-kushner-qatar-666-fifth-avenue-and-white-house-policy/