Monday, April 28, 2025

Just Bomb Iran Already


I know it’s not fashionable among some on the right, but we have a moral and strategic obligation to attack Iran right now. Not later. Not down the road, after more bogus negotiations with these glorified bazaar merchants who specialize in stringing along credulous Westerners until they get what they want. Today. We have the forces in place, and if we don’t do it, they’re going to end up with the bomb.

They cannot end up with the bomb. They’ll use it. It’s hard to mutually assure destruction with a psychotic death cult. 

But that’s not all America, in conjunction with Israel and supported by a bunch of Arab nations, who would be cheering from the sidelines, needs to do. Yes, we must comprehensively take out its nuclear capacity – it looks like these guys are weeks from enriching enough uranium to make a nuclear weapon. We also need to obliterate their ballistic and drone capabilities. We also need to wipe out their external terrorism capacity and internal security apparatus, and we need to kill the key mullahs. 

No more aspirin factory strikes after midnight. No more playing footsie. They started it, we need to finish it. I’m not suggesting an invasion of Iran – if the Iranian people want to overthrow these seventh-century scumbags and retake their heritage as a great nation, that’s on them. We’ve done enough nation-building. But the mullahs can’t remain a danger to us, and right now they are.

Nuclear weapons mounted on ballistic missiles are a direct threat to the United States of America, as well as our friends and allies around the world. That’s indisputable. Those hand-waving away the mullahs' sordid track record of murder and atrocity committed in the name of that bizarre dictatorship are simply not facing reality. 

And I like a lot of the people doing that hand-waving. I respect them, and their opinions should be considered. Maybe I'm wrong. I'm willing to be talked out of this. I would prefer not to go to war. But I'd also prefer not to be obliterated by a bunch of lunatics trying to resuscitate the 53rd missing ayatollah or whatever the hell they're on about. These guys hate us and want us dead. Pretending that America doesn’t have enemies around the world who want to butcher us is both crazy and wrong, and we dare not be guided by that childlike and sophomoric fantasy. 

Nor do I want to hear any crap about how "America started it." It’s objectively false – we did not start this, except in the sense we refuse to embrace their brand of primitive fanaticism – but I don’t care if we did. You don’t ever get to threaten or kill Americans, two things these savages have been doing for nearly half a century. They took our people hostage in 1979, and eight of our men were killed trying to rescue them. They were behind the Beirut bombings that killed hundreds of American diplomats and Marines. They backed terrorists who slaughtered Americans around the world. They armed and led the Shia thugs who maimed or killed thousands of our troops in Iraq. Payback is in order.

We talk a lot about a Jacksonian foreign policy, where America doesn’t go looking for trouble. But there’s another side to that coin. And that side depicts us wiping out anybody who dares kill Americans. The fact that we’ve allowed these barbarians to murder our people without retaliation is not only a moral disgrace but an invitation for every psychopath with a religious vision and an IED to make some Americans dead.

This is intolerable. The proper state of the world is one in which the mere thought of harming an American never arises because of the certainty that to do so will bring death to the terrorists, to everybody around the terrorists, and to everybody who helped the terrorists. 

Andrew Jackson wasn’t just a big talker. If you messed with him, you died. This is actually the peaceful way – you come down hard once, and you don’t have to do it again. To be weak is to invite more conflicts; we’ve had plenty because of our weakness. Many of America’s foreign policy disasters since World War II, when Harry Truman had the stones to nuke Japan until it begged to surrender, have been a direct result of our refusal to make attacking America or Americans something less than an automatic apocalypse. 

True Jacksonian foreign policy is tough but fair. It’s tough because if you screw with us, you die. It’s fair because if you don’t screw with us, we leave you alone.

Which brings us back to Iran. Iran is a threat to the United States. It has maimed and murdered our people. It has, directly and through proxies, threatened to kill our President, though, in that way it’s basically channeling much of the Democrat party. It must be made an example of.

And now is the time to do it. We have the forces in place. The Israelis are chomping at the bit to help, which is very useful. According to open-source information, at least six B-2 bombers are on-station and can attack dug-in facilities. Two carrier battle groups and cruise missile subs are also in the region, as well as other forces. They can’t stay on-station forever. The Iranians know this. That’s why they’re dragging out these bogus negotiations. Eventually, those forces will have to come home. We can’t be poised to do this forever, or even for very long.

Now, there may be good reasons not to do it, should facts we do not know support holding off. We don’t know the classified information about Iranian targets and whether they are actually vulnerable to our weapon systems. From open sources, it appears they are, but that might not be true. Second, we may lack the capacity to do what’s necessary. We have a pretty heavy force forward-deployed there now, but that might not be enough. Further, we might have used up too many weapons supplying Ukraine and that endless meat grinder of a war, as well as bombing whatever the Houthis are further back into the Stone Age. There may be other factors that we are unaware of that make an attack a bad idea.

But I kind of doubt it.

There’s disagreement within the administration, as there should be. The last thing we want is the kind of certainty and unanimity that got us into Iraq and kept us in Afghanistan long after we should’ve left with our enemies dead and their lands in ruins. The sorry legacy of the disaster that was the global war on terrorism has made conservatives justifiably cynical about the use of American power. But the lesson should not be that America must sit by while people threaten and kill us. The lesson is that we must use our power wisely to win. This means leveraging our advantage to brutally defeat the enemy so comprehensively and quickly it cannot respond. We knew how to do that once. I was there at the VII Corps main headquarters in Desert Storm when our forces annihilated an entire national army in 100 hours in a victory that was on par with the victories of Alexander, Hannibal, and Julius Caesar. Defeat is a choice, but so is victory.

Being wise about using power is not the same as never using power. Nor should we be bound by guilt over largely imagined wrongs allegedly committed by America. Let’s be really clear about something. Nothing America has done to Iran justifies Iran killing hundreds or thousands of Americans. It doesn’t justify them killing one American. But the mullahs did kill Americans, and they must pay.

Now is the time. We’re not going to have this opportunity again. We can’t let the mullahs slither out of justice once more. The second they have an advantage, they will use it, and more Americans will die. We can’t be nice enough to them so that they stop thinking of us as the Great Satan. They want us dead. We should take them seriously and act seriously.

Hopefully, this negotiation nonsense is just for show to mollify the weak hearts of the West, of which there are far too many. The mullahs are never going to give up their nuke program. They know it, and we know it, and anybody who doesn’t know it is either a liar or a halfwit. Pull off the damn Band-Aid and get this done.



X22, And we Know, and more- April 28

 



We Must Teach Children to Love Freedom More Than Government


There is a sentence that has long bothered me.  It is treated as a piece of universal wisdom that humans gain with experience, and surely every member of a modern, industrial society has heard it in some form.  Whether spoken by a close friend or complete stranger, its utterance usually comes with a sly grin that invites the listener to reconsider a fundamental belief.  Here it is: That’s not how the real world works.

That dirty, little sentence slithers into conversations meant to turn a person’s perception of reality upside down.  We hear it when we question why people who commit the same criminal offenses are often punished differently.  We hear it when we question why less qualified people are admitted to schools or offered jobs to other applicants’ detriment.  We hear it when we question why certain businesses always seem to get government contracts, even when they routinely overcharge and underperform.  We learn that laws, merit, moral character, and hard work exist alongside nepotism, prejudice, favoritism, corruption, and other invisible factors that magnify or hinder individual opportunity.

What’s particularly strange about this lesson is that most of us do not learn it firsthand until we have neared the end of our teenaged years.  For those who have been fortunate enough to grow up in good families with loving parents committed to moral principles, it can be jarring to step into the “real world” to discover a society awash with malign influences and untruths.  

An eighteen-year-old who joins the military is inclined to believe that the government would never recklessly endanger servicemembers’ lives; military life, however, quickly teaches that reckless endangerment is a large part of the job.  A twenty-two-year-old who joins a company is inclined to believe that the best employees will earn promotions; work life, however, quickly teaches that professional advancement is not always fair.  A young person who has never held a job is inclined to believe that taxpayers should “pay their fair share”; a new hire who sees a third or more of his paycheck deducted for a litany of government programs has a much different perspective.  

It takes most of us two decades to grasp that a great deal of what we have been told about life is different in the “real world.”  That’s an awful waste of adolescence, isn’t it?  Can you imagine an ancient tribe teaching its youngest members the wrong ways to track and hunt prey only to reveal much-needed survival skills after two decades of life?  Of course not.  Only in modern, industrial societies does it somehow make sense to disguise the “real world” from the youngest generation until its members stumble into adulthood.  Then we shake our heads in dismay and wonder why so many young adults are stumbling.

However, there is something far more nefarious about these abrupt “real world” lessons: they reveal that much of society is based on deception.  In the West, young people are taught that their societies embrace free markets, free speech, and democratic forms of government.  In the “real world,” central banks distort currency values and manipulate markets, while regulatory burdens make it difficult for regular people to own and operate independent businesses.  In the “real world,” governments censor speech that challenges official policy, and prominent public figures, such as Hillary Clinton, openly call for the imprisonment of citizens who express unapproved points of view.  In the “real world,” unelected bureaucrats and espionage agencies manage most domestic and foreign policies with scant interest in the opinions of the national populations they purportedly represent.  Young Westerners are taught that bigger and more oppressive forms of government will make them “free.”  Only later in life do some discover that State-controlled economies and institutional policing of speech achieve the exact opposite.

What would be so bad about teaching children how the real world works?  Shouldn’t they be told from an early age that governments are the greatest threats to their lives and liberties?  

After all, government agents decide what they can and cannot do, what kinds of property they may and may not possess, and how much of their future earnings they must hand over to the State.  Government agents decide whether they are “extremists” who should be kept under surveillance, whether their private communications will be intercepted, and whether their doors will be kicked down in the middle of the night.  Government agents decide which religious practices, civil rights, and forms of speech will be safeguarded and which will be criminalized.  Government agents decide which groups of people will be protected and which groups will be prosecuted.  Government agents decide when borders will be kept secure.  Government agents decide when to mandate experimental pharmaceutical injections.  Government agents decide what levels of toxicity in food and water supplies are acceptable.  Government agents decide when to send the youngest generations off to fight in foreign wars.  

To prepare children for the “real world,” we should teach them that governments are not cuddly stuffed animals that hand out free hugs; they are the monsters in the dark that unleash real-life nightmares.

For a while, the world was heading in that direction.  The European Enlightenment redirected political power away from sovereign monarchies claiming a divine right to rule and toward civilian populations increasingly cognizant of their God-given rights.  The War for American Independence and the founding of the United States inverted traditional notions of political power by explicitly linking legitimate government authority to the will of the people.  The U.S. Constitution forbids the federal government from exercising any powers not specifically enumerated and reserves the bulk of political power for American citizens and the individual states.  The Bill of Rights is a non-exhaustive list of individual rights that government agents absolutely must not infringe — a constitutional redundancy that restricts government authority to its finite and itemized obligations.  

As the apotheosis of Enlightenment liberalism, the U.S. Constitution concretely recognizes that government power is inherently dangerous and that no form of government can be remotely trusted.  In other words, America’s political revolution and founding documents shattered the political illusions of the past and declared, “This is how the real world works!”

It is nothing short of tragic that in the two and a half centuries since America’s birth the very lessons that informed her founding have been forgotten or ignored.  In essence, we have become a society of children who must relearn what we once considered common knowledge.

In describing this historical amnesia in America and throughout the West, Mr. Edward D. Holman wrote beautifully last month, “What’s particularly galling is that we have been funding a Cheshire Cat, an ideal still displaying its original grin but showing less and less of its original body.”  Such eloquent imagery captures our problem nicely.  We have a Bill of Rights, but the Supreme Court has habitually failed to protect it from government intrusion on behalf of the American people.  In fact, the Judiciary has proved itself no more capable of dispassionately preserving the U.S. Constitution than the politicians who have distorted the powers of the Legislative and Executive Branches for over two hundred years.  

The end result is that Americans must regularly defend their rights against a federal government that wishes to diminish them.  At the same time, institutions that have no genesis in the Constitution — such as the Federal Reserve, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Internal Revenue Service, and Central Intelligence Agency — endlessly expand their powers over the American people.  The Constitution’s “Cheshire Cat” has all but disappeared.  All that’s left is the Deep State’s fiendish grin.

That’s not how the real world should work, but that’s how it works right now.  If we want to change that, we must teach the youngest generations that freedom — not government — is worth preserving.



Why Are the Democrats So Desperate?


I suspect you’ve noticed how desperate the Democrats have become.  They're just hysterical about many things, such as getting that MS-13 thug back from El Salvador.  They are also still screeching about DOGE, and they’ve got every judge they can find doing everything possible to block Trump’s agenda—"Hey yeah, we want to go to foreign countries and bring in gang members who beat their wives, and let’s waste as much taxpayer money as possible.” They have to know that these are not winning issues.  Well, some of them might not know.  

But I can’t help but wonder, why are they doing this?  I read that Florida is trying to pass a law that would forbid pornography in public schools, and, totally unsurprisingly, the Democrats are opposing the law.  Why are they so desperate to defend things that are so reprehensible, disgusting, and unAmerican? 

Well, let me try to explain this a little. One reason is simply because of their hatred of Donald Trump.  They despise him so much that anything he supports, they oppose.  It’s blind, unreasoning hatred, but it’s there, and has been for several years.

But hatred of Trump is just a symptom of a greater disease.  The Left is doing what it's doing because it's who they are, it’s literally their religion.  And they believe it whole-heartedly, so much so that they cannot, will not, compromise it, they are willing to die (or kill others) on the cross of Marxism.  It’s who—and what—they are.  At least the leadership.  Most of the rank and file are just sheep.

Permit me to make a comparison to try to explain this fully.  I'm a Christian.  I believe in the Christian religion.  I believe that Jesus is Lord, and I believe it because I believe that historical facts justify that conclusion.  I whole-heartedly believe in Christianity, and I am not willing, I will not, compromise on any of its historical facts or doctrines.  As imperfect as I am, the Christian religion, in a major sense, is who, and what, I am.

And the exact same principle applies to Democrats and the Left.  Their religion is atheistic Marxism.  They believe in it uncompromisingly; any attack on it comes straight out of hell and must be vociferously resisted and defeated.  And they currently see Donald Trump as the Great Satan.  But, they lost the last election.  The American people, by and large, rejected their religion, and that’s more than they can handle.  They are fighting back as vociferously, as desperately, as they can.  And they won’t give up their religion any more than I will give up mine.  And they refuse to admit that their religion, Marxism, is false—based on several fallacious historical and philosophical principles.  (Read my current series of articles on my substack “Why Marxism/Communism Fails.”)

Thus, their desperation to oppose anything they believe attacks their atheistic, Marxist religion.  Some examples.

One of the principles of Marxism is globalism—a world-wide, “socialist revolution” which has been the core of Marx’s philosophy from the beginning.  Thus, they hate American “nationalism” because it contradicts a major dogma of their religion.  They want that MS-13, “Maryland man” gang member back in the United States, and they want America’s borders open to the world.  They don’t believe in “America,” they believe in the world-wide socialist utopia.  Borders must ultimately be broken down and destroyed.  Frankly, I wouldn’t, in principle, be opposed to a “one world government”; I see nothing in Christianity that would make it a “sin.”  But I would want the right people running it, godly people who respected the laws of God and the freedoms of man.  That isn’t Marxism.  Marxism is atheism.  I don’t want China overseeing the “one-world government,” and as long as Marxism pushes for a world revolution, I’m going to oppose it.  I will defend American nationalism because I believe in religious freedom.  Marxism doesn’t.  The Soviet Union and China are perfect examples of that.    

And, indeed, the Left sees God and the Judeo-Christian heritage as, ultimately, their supreme enemy.  It’s understandable.  Theism’s greatest enemy is atheism, and visa-versa.  So, the Left is frantic to undermine and destroy Judeo-Christian values—the Florida pornography thing.  It’s who they are.  Abortion, homosexuality, child-mutilation, same-sex marriage, pedophilia, pornography, licentious sex and promiscuity, attacks on the nuclear family—all of this is anti-Judeo/Christian morality and is thus really inherent in the Marxist, Leftist philosophy.  

The Marxist Left are also believers in totalitarian government, and all their cries about “democracy” are so much poppycock and hypocrisy.  This is a major reason why they oppose DOGE—they want the government to control as much of society as possible.  Cutting government spending cuts government power.  They want as many people on welfare and food stamps as possible—that makes them dependent upon government.  The more power and dominance the government has, the more the Left likes it.  Government is their solution to every problem—as long as they control it. 

This is also another reason they want the illegal invasion to continue.  Most of those coming in illegally to America are low-skilled workers who will probably end up in poverty or needing government assistance.  It’s a new slave class, folks. The Democrats were the party of slavery, of course, and now they are the party of the “new slavery”—get as many people as possible reliant on government, wards of the states, slaves to their new totalitarian masters.  A 13th century Moslem ruler of India said, “The Hindus will never become submissive and obedient until they are reduced to poverty.”  What better way to enslave people than by keeping them in poverty and controlling their finances?

The Democrats are desperate, folks, because they lost last year; Americans largely rejected their religion.  So, they are fighting back with everything they’ve got.  And they aren’t going to give up because Leftism is who, and what, they are.



🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Nat Sec Advisor Mike Waltz Discusses Geopolitical Issues with Maria Bartiromo



I am trying to avoid my own confirmation bias, which is difficult in this case, because when Congressman Mike Waltz was announced as NSA to President-elect Donald Trump, immediately I thought he would be the first to exit the national security team; his ideology just doesn’t mesh right.

Following the fiasco with Signal and his Jeffrey Goldberg foul up, it looked like Waltz was pushed out of the immediate circle of influence and instead told to focus on restructuring the National Security Council.  His proximity still exists, but his immediate role appears -at least outwardly- to have shifted; he seems less influential as a direct emissary for President Trump to foreign intelligence peers and leaders.

I have this horribly annoying affliction to noticing small details and taking notes, and all indications point in that direction.  When you start to notice this shift, what becomes evident is within the verbiage used as a proximity person begins describing events as if they were an observer, not a direct participant. [The “we” is lost.] Listen to how Mike Waltz describes current geopolitical events, he sounds like a pundit not a participant.



If my suspicion is correct, President Trump has a NatSec Advisor in name only.

This is What Happens When Law Enforcement Works Together on Illegal Immigration

This is What Happens When Law Enforcement Works Together on Illegal Immigration

AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File

A joint federal, state, and local immigration enforcement operation dubbed "Operation Tidal Wave" led to the arrest of nearly 800 illegal aliens across Florida over the last few days.

According to the Tallahassee Democrat, the law enforcement effort targeted people in Miami-Dade and Broward counties and the cities of Tampa, Orlando, Jacksonville, Stuart, Tallahassee, and Fort Myers. 

Of the 800 arrested, 275 were arrested with final orders of removal, meaning that an immigration judge had already ordered them out of the country.

"This is one of the first large-scale missions we've done like this ever," ICE director Todd Lyons told ABC News.

"We brought a 'whole the government' approach with cooperative jurisdictions that want to help ICE secure communities in neighborhoods and remove public safety threats from our neighborhoods," he added.

"The records do not explain in detail how the federal government chose its targets, but do say that authorities are trying to detain 'criminal individuals or immigration violators' that have final deportation orders," the media sources told the Democrat.

Indeed, many of those arrested have violent criminal records.

Daily Mail:

One of those busted was Jose Sanchez Reyes, a Colombian immigrant who entered the US illegally after being convicted of homicide in his home nation, according to Fox.

Rafael Juarex Cabrera, a Guatemalan immigrant and alleged MS-13 member, was also caught. He had illegally reentered the US three times, officials said. 

Russian immigrant Savva Klishchevskii was also detained for an InterpolRed Notice out of Russia for vehicular manslaughter. 

Officials said Honduran Aron Isaak Morazan-Izaguirre was taken in. He is a suspected member of the 18th Street Gang and had illegally re-entered the US twice.

In a statement, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said, "President Trump and I have a clear message to those in our country illegally: LEAVE NOW."

Practically speaking, self-deportation is the best answer. With at least 11 million illegal aliens living in the United States, the enormous amount of resources that would have to be expended to capture and deport even a fraction of them makes self-deportation the most efficient and economical means of addressing the problem.

"Florida is leading the nation in active cooperation with the Trump administration for immigration enforcement and deportation operations!" Florida Governor Ron DeSantis wrote on X.

Non-cooperation with federal law enforcement by state and local police authorities is a choice. Even if they are "sanctuary cities" and states, the law still allows for cooperation with federal authorities to enforce immigration law.

Big cities and blue states refuse to cooperate. Part of the reason is political in that their sizeable Hispanic voting blocs are sensitive to enforcing immigration laws. But the big city mayors are also under pressure from national Democrats not to cooperate with Donald Trump. 

When law enforcement at every level works together, it's amazing what can be accomplished.

Tallahassee Democrat:

Nearly 230 Florida law enforcement agencies, including sheriff's offices, city police departments and college and university campus police,e have signed 287(g) agreements, the most out of any state in the nation, the Herald/Times said.

More than 130 of the currently active agreements are under the task force model, which allows law enforcement agencies to enforce limited immigration authority with ICE oversight, including questioning, arresting, and detaining people suspected of violating federal immigration laws.

State and local law enforcement partners have also been enlisted to help with federal immigration enforcement through the 287(g) program, an ICE initiative that allows local law enforcement agencies to help "identify and remove criminal aliens who are amenable to removal from the U.S.," according to ICE.

We can expect to see more of these joint operations in the near future. All that's necessary is a willingness to work together to address the problem.


Due Process

Due Process
By Judd Garrett


There has been a lot of talk about “due process” recently. According to some, the United States of America is required to give due process to every single illegal alien in our country before we are allowed to deport them to their country of origin. That was the biggest issue regarding the Trump Administration’s deportation of El Salvador citizen and MS-13 gang member, Kilmar Abrego Garcia earlier this month. They claim that he was not given due process. When Senator Chris Van Hollen travelled down to El Salvador to visit the MS-13 gang member last week, he defended his visit with the known vicious gang member by saying, “I am not defending the man. I’m defending the rights of this man to due process.” 

10 million illegal aliens decided to enter our country during Joe Biden’s presidency without due process, and now those same 10 million illegal aliens are claiming that we cannot deport them without due process. Why? Why can’t we? Illegals have no legal right to due process before being deported because they are not in this country legally. They choose to circumvent the legal system by coming across the border illegally. They did not come to a recognized point of entry and claim asylum. They intentionally avoided the legal process of entry, so they have no grounds to demand a legal process before deportation. The only due process that these people deserve is – you’re not a citizen, you came here illegally, get out.  

Nobody who is claiming that these illegals deserve due process actually cares about due process. That is the entire point. There are not enough judges, not enough courts, not enough hours in the day, not enough days in a year to give every illegal alien due process. We would have to provide 7,350 formal court hearings to these illegals every single day, including weekends and holidays, from today until the last day of Donald Trump’s presidency to process just the illegal aliens who came here under Biden. The entire system would be overwhelmed to the point that it would collapse. And that is the whole point.

The entire strategy of the pro-open border, pro-illegal alien crowd is to have the illegals avoid due process. They are banking on the fact that we do not have the resources to give all of the illegals due process, so we will eventually grant them all amnesty unilaterally. And that is why the Biden Administration opened the southern border and allowed 10 million illegals to flood our system – to avoid due process. So, the continual demand for due process for every illegal alien is an attempt to have the illegals avoid due process.

None of these people actually care about the principle of due process in the first place. Everyone who is demanding due process for every illegal immigrant, were all silent when, on September 11, 2011, President Barack Obama ordered a drone strike that killed United States citizens, Anwar Al-Awlaki and Samir Khan. The Obama Administration claimed that these men had terrorist ties which they most likely did, but they were still United States citizens who were not given due process before they were killed by the United States government. At the moment they were killed, they were not on the field of battle or threatening anyone. Obama’s order was a direct violation of these US citizens constitutional rights to due process under the 5th and 14th amendment. And no one said a word about due process then.

None of these people cared about due process for the January 6 rioters who were arrested and thrown into the squalid DC jails and sat there for over a year without a hearing, without due process. No one who is demanding for due process for non-citizen illegal aliens now, cared about due process for American citizens then. This is typical of the Democrats. They only care about a principal when it serves their agenda, and when the same principle works against their agenda, they completely ignore it or willfully violate it. “Due process” is like every other buzz word or phrase that the Democrats love to throw around like, racist, fascists, Nazi, Hitler, misogynist, homophobic, democracy, etc. The Democrats do not actually understand or care to adhere to the true meaning of the words. Those words are malleable, and the definitions can be completely inverted to serve the purposes of the Democrats or to be weaponized against their opponents.

We saw that last week in Wisconsin when Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan obstructed ICE officials attempt to arrest a known criminal illegal alien, Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, by helping him and his lawyer escape out of her courtroom through the jury door. This illegal alien that she helped to escape, has “a laundry list of violent criminal charges including strangulation and suffocation, battery, and domestic abuse,” and had entered the United States illegally twice.  The judge has been arrested and charged by the FBI, and now, the Democrats are crying foul. Senator Amy Klobuchar tweeted that her arrest “threatens the rule of law.” Senator Bernie Sanders called it “growing authoritarianism.” But a judge who takes the law into her own hands, is the one who threatens the rule of law and is authoritarian. The due process for anyone who obstructs federal law enforcement by aiding and abetting a criminal alien is arrest and federal charges. That’s due process. The same people who demand due process for every illegal alien want a judge who violates federal law to be above the law and avoid due process. 

What has been forgotten in the entire due process debate has been the due process for the American citizens. Don’t American citizens have the right to know that the illegal aliens that are being given legal status and will be living in their neighborhoods, have been vetted properly to make sure that they are not criminals or gang members or cartel smugglers? That due process is vitally important to the safety and security of every American. Our country became more violent and more crime and drug infested because the Biden Administration did not care about due process when letting these aliens into our country. But the open borders crowd wants to give those same people citizenship without due process because they don’t care if these illegal aliens are violent criminals or not. They only care that they will vote for them, and if they bring more crime and violence to our country, that is better for the Democrats because it gives them a reason to seize more and more power from the citizens which is what the Democrats are all about, anyway.

 

Black Hawk Pilot Ignored Instructor Before Deadly D.C. Collision That Killed 67



According to preliminary reports, the Black Hawk pilot involved in the crash ignored direct instructions from a flight instructor in the critical moments leading up to the incident, which resulted in 67 people to be dead.

Prior to the crash, Capt. Rebecca Lobach was undergoing her yearly flight evaluation with Chief Warrant Officer 2 Andrew Loyd Eaves, who was acting as her flight instructor. The report states that air traffic controllers warned them about a nearby airliner. Both Lobach and Eaves acknowledged the warning and opted for “visual separation,” a standard procedure that lets pilots steer clear of other aircraft using their own judgment instead of relying solely on air traffic control directives.

The helicopter was 15 seconds from intersecting with a jet’s path when Eaves suggested to Lobach that they should turn left, likely based on air traffic control guidance. Turning left would have created more distance from the oncoming jet, but Lobach chose not to make the turn.

Additionally, officials found that the pilots accidentally interrupted some of the air traffic controller’s instructions—known as “stepping on” transmissions—by pressing their radio buttons at the same time, likely causing them to miss critical information. Investigators believe Eaves and Lobach missed the crucial detail that the American Airlines plane was “circling” because one of them was holding down the microphone button to speak, blocking the transmission from air traffic control at that moment.

The breakdown in the chain of command underscores the growing concerns that standards and adherence to authority may be eroding in the name of political correctness.



More on Cory and Hakeem's Not-So-Excellent Adventure on the Steps of Congress


Nick Arama reporting for RedState 

I have to admit I find this ridiculous "sit-in" from House Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) very funny. It's much like Booker's 25-hour fake filibuster: "look at me, I'm fighting" -- as they just sit there complaining. So forgive me if I take a little time to mock them today.

This is about the billionth time the Democrats have tried to sell us on "Trump is Hitler" and is going to push Grandma over the cliff. Here they are at it again. 

As I mentioned earlier, they were even preaching the Gospel to us from the steps. Not doing anything positive for the American people, but play-acting at "fighting" for us. Their current topic for this "sit-in" appears to be the budget as they once again falsely claim Trump and the Republicans are going to cut things like Medicaid.


BACKGROUNDHoo Boy: Cory Booker and Hakeem Jeffries Hold Sit-In on the Steps of Congress - I Can't Stop Laughing


They've now moved on from Christianity and the Gospel, which I wrote about earlier, to Islam and the words of Booker's favorite Muslim poet: Muhammad Ali. Booker is speaking here with Rep. André Carson (D-IN). 

But hey, guys, they're "feeling strong" and they've been out there for six hours. Stunning and brave. They're truly heroic. 

Keep going into this week and stay outside while Republicans are voting -- then you may have done something helpful. 

Do they think sitting on steps like this makes them look like they're actually doing something? Or that it makes them more relatable? 

Who would vote for this? It isn't about religion or trying to act like us, guys. It's about doing productive things. You can't fake that. You can't talk your way into that when you keep providing policies that hurt us. They're not even bothering to stand up in this stunt. They're just lounging around, talking to each other. Why can't they stop fear-mongering about Trump and Republicans, and do something worthwhile? 

I don't even think they're fooling people on the left with this. Because what does it produce? The same thing Booker's 25-hour narcissism-fest did: absolutely nothing. Reminder: while live-streaming this as a "conversation" with the people, they disabled the chat and comment parts of YouTube so Americans couldn't weigh in on all this. 

But they may come out of it with sore butts. 

People had fun laughing at them. 


We Must Teach Children to Love Freedom More Than Government

We Must Teach Children to Love Freedom More Than Government

J. B. Shurk for American Thinker 


There is a sentence that has long bothered me.  It is treated as a piece of universal wisdom that humans gain with experience, and surely every member of a modern, industrial society has heard it in some form.  Whether spoken by a close friend or complete stranger, its utterance usually comes with a sly grin that invites the listener to reconsider a fundamental belief.  Here it is: That’s not how the real world works.

That dirty, little sentence slithers into conversations meant to turn a person’s perception of reality upside down.  We hear it when we question why people who commit the same criminal offenses are often punished differently.  We hear it when we question why less qualified people are admitted to schools or offered jobs to other applicants’ detriment.  We hear it when we question why certain businesses always seem to get government contracts, even when they routinely overcharge and underperform.  We learn that laws, merit, moral character, and hard work exist alongside nepotism, prejudice, favoritism, corruption, and other invisible factors that magnify or hinder individual opportunity.

What’s particularly strange about this lesson is that most of us do not learn it firsthand until we have neared the end of our teenaged years.  For those who have been fortunate enough to grow up in good families with loving parents committed to moral principles, it can be jarring to step into the “real world” to discover a society awash with malign influences and untruths.  

An eighteen-year-old who joins the military is inclined to believe that the government would never recklessly endanger servicemembers’ lives; military life, however, quickly teaches that reckless endangerment is a large part of the job.  A twenty-two-year-old who joins a company is inclined to believe that the best employees will earn promotions; work life, however, quickly teaches that professional advancement is not always fair.  A young person who has never held a job is inclined to believe that taxpayers should “pay their fair share”; a new hire who sees a third or more of his paycheck deducted for a litany of government programs has a much different perspective.  

It takes most of us two decades to grasp that a great deal of what we have been told about life is different in the “real world.”  That’s an awful waste of adolescence, isn’t it?  Can you imagine an ancient tribe teaching its youngest members the wrong ways to track and hunt prey only to reveal much-needed survival skills after two decades of life?  Of course not.  Only in modern, industrial societies does it somehow make sense to disguise the “real world” from the youngest generation until its members stumble into adulthood.  Then we shake our heads in dismay and wonder why so many young adults are stumbling.

However, there is something far more nefarious about these abrupt “real world” lessons: they reveal that much of society is based on deception.  In the West, young people are taught that their societies embrace free markets, free speech, and democratic forms of government.  In the “real world,” central banks distort currency values and manipulate markets, while regulatory burdens make it difficult for regular people to own and operate independent businesses.  In the “real world,” governments censor speech that challenges official policy, and prominent public figures, such as Hillary Clinton, openly call for the imprisonment of citizens who express unapproved points of view.  In the “real world,” unelected bureaucrats and espionage agencies manage most domestic and foreign policies with scant interest in the opinions of the national populations they purportedly represent.  Young Westerners are taught that bigger and more oppressive forms of government will make them “free.”  Only later in life do some discover that State-controlled economies and institutional policing of speech achieve the exact opposite.

What would be so bad about teaching children how the real world works?  Shouldn’t they be told from an early age that governments are the greatest threats to their lives and liberties?  

After all, government agents decide what they can and cannot do, what kinds of property they may and may not possess, and how much of their future earnings they must hand over to the State.  Government agents decide whether they are “extremists” who should be kept under surveillance, whether their private communications will be intercepted, and whether their doors will be kicked down in the middle of the night.  Government agents decide which religious practices, civil rights, and forms of speech will be safeguarded and which will be criminalized.  Government agents decide which groups of people will be protected and which groups will be prosecuted.  Government agents decide when borders will be kept secure.  Government agents decide when to mandate experimental pharmaceutical injections.  Government agents decide what levels of toxicity in food and water supplies are acceptable.  Government agents decide when to send the youngest generations off to fight in foreign wars.  

To prepare children for the “real world,” we should teach them that governments are not cuddly stuffed animals that hand out free hugs; they are the monsters in the dark that unleash real-life nightmares.

For a while, the world was heading in that direction.  The European Enlightenment redirected political power away from sovereign monarchies claiming a divine right to rule and toward civilian populations increasingly cognizant of their God-given rights.  The War for American Independence and the founding of the United States inverted traditional notions of political power by explicitly linking legitimate government authority to the will of the people.  The U.S. Constitution forbids the federal government from exercising any powers not specifically enumerated and reserves the bulk of political power for American citizens and the individual states.  The Bill of Rights is a non-exhaustive list of individual rights that government agents absolutely must not infringe — a constitutional redundancy that restricts government authority to its finite and itemized obligations.  

As the apotheosis of Enlightenment liberalism, the U.S. Constitution concretely recognizes that government power is inherently dangerous and that no form of government can be remotely trusted.  In other words, America’s political revolution and founding documents shattered the political illusions of the past and declared, “This is how the real world works!”

It is nothing short of tragic that in the two and a half centuries since America’s birth the very lessons that informed her founding have been forgotten or ignored.  In essence, we have become a society of children who must relearn what we once considered common knowledge.

In describing this historical amnesia in America and throughout the West, Mr. Edward D. Holman wrote beautifully last month, “What’s particularly galling is that we have been funding a Cheshire Cat, an ideal still displaying its original grin but showing less and less of its original body.”  Such eloquent imagery captures our problem nicely.  We have a Bill of Rights, but the Supreme Court has habitually failed to protect it from government intrusion on behalf of the American people.  In fact, the Judiciary has proved itself no more capable of dispassionately preserving the U.S. Constitution than the politicians who have distorted the powers of the Legislative and Executive Branches for over two hundred years.  

The end result is that Americans must regularly defend their rights against a federal government that wishes to diminish them.  At the same time, institutions that have no genesis in the Constitution — such as the Federal Reserve, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Internal Revenue Service, and Central Intelligence Agency — endlessly expand their powers over the American people.  The Constitution’s “Cheshire Cat” has all but disappeared.  All that’s left is the Deep State’s fiendish grin.

That’s not how the real world should work, but that’s how it works right now.  If we want to change that, we must teach the youngest generations that freedom — not government — is worth preserving.