Friday, April 11, 2025

Trump's Life's Work Culminates in Confronting Communist China


On Wednesday, President Donald Trump abruptly announced a 90-day pause on most of his planned country-specific "reciprocal" tariffs -- with the notable exception of the People's Republic of China. In so strikingly singling out China as the focus of America's economic and geopolitical ire, Trump was not merely clarifying that the United States views China and its regnant Communist Party as our leading 21st-century threat -- he was also taking yet another notable step toward fulfilling his own lifelong goal of fundamentally resetting the terms of the U.S.-China bilateral relationship.

As an "outer-borough" native New Yorker from Queens, Trump has long seen things differently than most of his white-shoe brethren and fellow one-percenters living across the (literal and proverbial) river in Manhattan. Throughout virtually his entire career, Trump has served as a "class traitor" archetype -- someone who, as I wrote in an essay last year, "may hold 'elite' ruling class credentials, but whose hearts, minds, concerns, and general sensibilities are decidedly with the country class." That is the essence of Trump's nationalist-populist MAGA political coalition. But it's also who Trump has been since his earliest interviews with the New York City tabloids and TV hosts all those decades ago.

There is no better example than trade, Trump's most consistently held political position. In the 1980s, he was alarmed at the rise of Japan as an economic superpower, arguing that America's trade deficit with Japan was problematic and that the U.S. should respond with crippling tariffs. (It seems that Ronald Reagan, who in 1987 slapped a 100% tariff on many Japanese goods, was listening.) In recent decades, Trump has applied the same logic to the newer threat of China. In 2011, for instance, four years before he launched his successful presidential run, Trump railed against widely practiced Chinese currency manipulation: "They have manipulated their currency so violently towards this country, it is almost impossible for our companies to compete with Chinese companies."

During the first year of his first presidential term, Trump directed his Office of the U.S. Trade Representative to investigate Chinese trade practices. The subsequent report was damning, and Trump implemented numerous tariffs on Chinese goods -- tariffs that, to his rare credit, former President Joe Biden largely kept in place and even built upon. In addition to his first-term tariffs, Trump also filed a formal World Trade Organization case against China, alleging deceptive trade practices and intellectual property theft. As Trump put it at the time in a tweet: "Today I directed the U.S. Trade Representative to take action so that countries stop CHEATING the system at the expense of the USA!"

Trump's tariff escalation this week against Communist China -- even as he paused many other tariffs to allow for bilateral trade negotiations and give jittery bond markets some relief -- is a natural culmination of the work to reset the U.S.-China economic relationship that he commenced during his first term. For that matter, it is also the natural culmination of his short-lived third-party presidential run in 2000 with the trade protectionist Reform Party, as well as his 1988 "Oprah Winfrey Show" interview, where he teased a future presidential run that would focus on trade. Immigration may be the issue most readily associated with Trump's MAGA movement, but there is no issue that has been nearer and dearer to Trump's heart over the decades than trade -- first with Japan and then with China.

Most important, Trump has not just been outspoken on the issue of trade with China-he has been proven correct. 

Ever since Richard Nixon's fateful trip to visit Mao Zedong in Beijing in 1972, American elites of all political stripes promised that welcoming China into the global economy would be good for all parties involved. American consumers, we were reliably informed, would get cheaper and more abundant goods; American exporters would get a massive and exciting new market to peddle their wares; and the Chinese people themselves would soon reap the rewards of the "political liberalization" that could only come about through "economic liberalization." This was the dominant thinking when Nixon visited China over a half-century ago, when the George W. Bush administration welcomed China into the World Trade Organization in 2001, and when Barack Obama hosted and toasted Xi Jinping at the White House in 2015.

Suffice it to say it hasn't exactly all worked out according to plan.

In Shanghai in 2022, amid the communist country's interminable COVID-19 lockdowns, government drones with loudspeakers blasted: "Control your soul's thirst for freedom. Do not open your windows and sing." Chinese companies have engaged in serial intellectual property theft, brazenly stealing American companies' trade secrets and illegally repackaging them for export at heavily subsidized prices.

TikTok, one particularly problematic Chinese export, is mental fentanyl designed to addict the Western masses and dupe them into poisonous ideologies -- and Communist Party spyware, to boot. Speaking of (actual) fentanyl, China is largely responsible for that particular drug killing hundreds of thousands of vulnerable young Americans. Meanwhile, China sends "spy balloons" across the North American continent and routinely allies with the worst state actors on the planet. And if that weren't bad enough, America's manufacturing base and national security-critical supply chain infrastructure have been decimated -- by China.

For far too long, elites have led America to disaster when it comes to trade with China. They have acted in myopic and ruinous fashion, bringing calamity to the nation they purport to love. America's trade war with the rogue Chinese superpower must happen. The Chinese Communist Party must be crushed -- and there is no one better to crush them than the White House-dwelling class traitor par excellence, Donald Trump. Godspeed, Mr. President.



X22, And we Know, and more- April 11

 



Never, Never Stop


The Democrats and their supporters brought their own demise upon themselves. They simply cannot stop themselves until they hit the wall.

It would be too simplistic to say that the world wars of the previous century started because of the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and Hitler’s entry into Poland. There were many factors that developed over years and decades prior to those events; those two particular triggers ushered in the larger wars that were waiting to happen.

If one were to look way back just a few years ago and think about the move from Biden and DEI Democrats to Trump and MAGA Republicans, one might want to use one event as the trigger for a change that was waiting to happen. There is a Talmudic teaching “tafasta meroobah, lo tefasta kloom”: If you try to grab too much you end up with nothing. USA Today in 2022 named “Rachel" Levine, a guy pretending to be a lady with long hair and a skirt, one of its Women of the Year. The Babylon Bee did not miss a beat and declared Levine its Man of the Year, using the same photo as the newspaper used. The left should have left it alone. But the left can’t leave anything alone. Anyone who dares to question the Official Ideological Orthodoxy is attacked, deplatformed, sued, fired, harassed or otherwise punished. Twitter banned the Babylon Beeaccount for its chutzpah of pointing out that “Rachel” was still a man, however hard the Biden administration and its supporters wanted us to say otherwise. Elon Musk met the head of the Bee and for the first time publicly suggested that if one cannot make a joke, then maybe he should just buy Twitter. Some period of time and $44 billion later, Musk owned Twitter, now X.

Musk buying Twitter is in some ways the equivalent of the trigger events for the world wars. The key to the left’s program was having total control over all major social media and traditional news sources. Sure, there were websites like this one but as long as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and the big news outlets could be given marching orders, the left’s ideological wall could not be breached. With Twitter now allowing people to express themselves, the left lost control of the story. The Biden administration could claim that the border was closed, and people on X could clearly show otherwise. The left could claim that “Equity” (the most abused word in the English language) was good. Others could show that people in academe, government, and business selected for DEI reasons often were incompetent and at times, criminal (like the guy over at the Department of Energy stealing suitcases with women’s clothes). Once X was in the hands of Musk, people could find out what was going on and they did not like what they saw.

The “take it to 11” approach on the left applied to everything it touched. If they had wanted to be reelected, they should have dealt with the border. Their best proposal, which they tried to make into law, would have made “only” 5,000 illegals entering a day legal. If they had not passed such massive spending bills, inflation would not have been so painful for the average American. If they had not been so hellbent on going green, they would have kept their eye on the price of gas, something that most Americans feel. But the left has no brakes, no off ramps. Everything, like banning jokes and leaving the border totally open, were the logical outcomes for them. They could not tamp down their program because they couldn’t think of a reason not to go over the top. Hollywood, one tentacle of the left, made every movie a DEI bonanza: white guys were always the bad guys, women weighing less than their clothes could throw linebackers around, and whatever minority was in the movie was the default hero. Like in Washington, the folks in tinsel town did not care what the people actually wanted. They had a program, and there was no way to deviate from it without fear of punishment from the home team. Pro sports players with Rockefeller-level bank accounts took a knee to show that they had contempt for the country that afforded them so much success and wealth. How much would they get paid playing ball in Tonga?

One of the key features of Donald Trump after four years as president and four years, if you will, in the wilderness, is his balanced approach to governing. With abortion, he could have gone for a national ban, but he said he believes that each state should make its own laws—and with that, abortion vanished as a winning subject for the Democrats. He has come down on the winning side of most “80-20” issues like removing illegal aliens, keeping sports sex segregated, and making the military lethal and not politically correct. He has strong political instincts and he rarely assumes a position that is not supported by a majority of American citizens. The Democrats, on the other hand, keep pulling joker cards: bring back the violent criminals sent out of the country; stop looking for fraud and waste in the federal budget; keep guys in women’s sports; do not develop America’s vast energy reserves and thus keep energy and food prices high.

Because the left is ideologically based, it cannot apply any brakes. Think about abortion. First it was illegal. Then it became legal but had many restrictions. Over time, it has come to be the default position of the Democratic Party to support abortion until the moment of birth. There are those on the left who wish to extend the option to after birth, in the event that there are any health defects. This trajectory is true for every topic: the border, DEI, trans mania, etc. The left simply goes for the final, extreme position and has no way to turn around and walk things back. Look at the hatred displayed at Elon Musk for the “sin” of uncovering $4 billion a day in waste, fraud, and self-dealing. How do you hate someone who is cleaning up your budget? The Democrats are against a border that is finally effectively closed; they wish to prevent deportations or in some cases get those deported back. They don’t want to know that most Americans are happy that their tax dollars will be better spent and are glad that illegal aliens are being shown the door. The Democrats have no mechanism to stop and turn around. Gavin Newsom is trying to move to the middle lane, but he has so much baggage from his time destroying San Francisco and California that his Houdini-act will be a hard sell.

The Democrats refuse to learn from their election losses from 2024 because there is nothing that they can do differently. They cannot move to the middle to support a controlled border, a leaner budget and better trade deals. Many in their party come off as lunatics when they stand with a murderous death cult (Hamas) or complain that Donald Trump is making an effort to end the Ukraine bloodbath. I don’t think that the Democrats planned to become extremists; not being rooted in religion or a solid political philosophy, that was their only possible outcome.



Trump works a political miracle in Downing Street

 Obscured by the deafening cacophony of incomprehension about a number of the policy innovations of the Trump administration, there are some refreshing signs of progress. The movement away from authoritarian, socialistic, Davosian, woke Western self-reproach is broadening and accelerating.

 

 The worst-governed of the major Western countries were the first to move: Giorgia Meloni in Italy and Javier Milei in Argentina, and both are progressing well. Then came the mighty Trump victory over all the chicanery and corruption of the impenetrably complacent and shameless bipartisan Washington establishment.

 

The scurrilous allegation of collusion with Russia, the spurious impeachments, the likely theft of the 2020 election through millions of unverifiable harvested ballots, the rank fiction that he had attempted an insurrection at the US Capitol, when he had in fact offered National Guard security and warned that hooligans might be a problem, the scandalous self-abasement of the national political media and most of the polling organisations, and the perversion of the intelligence agencies and the criminal justice system in totalitarian harassment of the former president, topped out by presumably spontaneous assassination attempts made more dangerous by the utter incompetence of the Secret Service: all of it rejected by the country.

 

Former president Trump, outspent two to one and opposed by 95  percent of  a rabidly partisan and unprofessional national political press corps, was acquitted of all charges and returned to the headship of the American people by the largest jury in history, 78 million people.

The Germans, ever cautious, commendably so given the difficulties that late-unified country has had behaving responsibly as Europe’s most powerful nation, has moved sensibly to the Right. The new chancellor Friedrich Merz is a Reaganite though he clearly finds the next step in American political evolution to Trump a daunting leap in these early days.

 

But in some ways the most astounding course correction appears to be underway in the United Kingdom. Margaret Thatcher was, next to Mr. Churchill, the greatest British leader of the 20th century and as she had promised, she put “Great” back together with “Britain”. But she could not prevent the division of her party between Euro-federalists and supporters of a sovereign United Kingdom in the European Common Market.

 

And she never developed a natural successor. John Major was a good man and a fairly good prime minister but did not have the stature to lead a united government. Tony Blair took the Labour Party far from the extremes that so terribly damaged Britain under Harold Wilson, but New Labour was really just old Labour on the instalment plan. Gordon Brown, David Cameron, Theresa May, Boris Johnson, Liz Truss, Rishi Sunak and the early Keir Starmer, whatever their merits in other roles and as individuals, were failed prime ministers. It was a procession of inadequacy at the head of the government more prolonged and numerous than any in the history of the office of prime minister of the United Kingdom going back to Robert Walpole in 1721.

 

But something astounding has occurred. The first three months of Starmer’s government beginning in July of last year produced a spectacle of stupefying incompetence. Foreign Secretary David Lammy managed to humiliate the United Kingdom in the heretofore unheard of Chagos Islands.

 

Chancellor Rachel Reeves produced a budget that appeared to be carefully designed to throttle the stumbling British economy. And the regime leapt with the alacrity of a trained athlete into the tawdry practices of influence-peddling and petty corruption. But Starmer appeared to have the treacherous path ahead of him illuminated by President Trump, whom he and several of his senior colleagues had previously gratuitously disparaged. In quick succession, Starmer slashed his foreign aid bill in half and directed that money to national defence, promising that Britain will become an overachiever on its NATO pledge of two per cent of GDP to the military. He speaks of going to four per cent.

 

Best of all, £600 million annually of national health service bureaucracy was amputated, a move so brilliant and necessary that it was not much criticised by the official opposition, who after a great deal of hot air about streamlining the National Health Service, did absolutely nothing in that direction in their previous 14 years of government. There followed a statement of intent to cut welfare benefit by £5 million annually. The British Labour Party has suddenly become an agent for defending the country, ceasing to assist people who are not actually in need of medical assistance, and trimming away welfare cheats and putting the interests of the citizens of the country ahead of those whom the country fails to prevent from entering the country illegally in large numbers.

This was the fruit of Starmer’s visit to the White House, and he will be back soon to negotiate a trade deal with Trump. I was one of those who saw that the security of Western civilisation required that Trump evict the mockery of an administration which had usurped his position, but I did not imagine that he would have such a success as an evangelist of political common sense and straight talk. Let no one contemplating 10 and 11 Downing Street doubt the existence of political miracles.

https://brusselssignal.eu/2025/04/trump-works-a-political-miracle-in-downing-street/


🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Conservatives Aren’t ‘Christian Nationalists,’ They’re Just Homesick For America


Homesickness is what Americans have been feeling. It’s far from the corporate media’s misuse of the term ‘Christian nationalism.’



Christian nationalism” is the bad penny that keeps turning up in media propaganda. Over and over and over again. It’s an obvious trope that often conflates fascism with a very natural love of homeland.

Nationalism is very connected with a sense of identity and the hardwired human need for a sense of belonging. If Americans (as well as other peoples) have more consciously embraced it, I think that’s because many have felt like displaced persons adrift in a sea of wokeness.

As I’ll explain below, Americans are merely homesick for the America we once knew as a place where we agreed to strive for liberty and justice for all.

Interestingly, there are signals that the propaganda tropes on nationalism are not an easy sell. For example, socialist writer Harold Meyerson recently made the case that the left should reclaim nationalism as something it actually stands for. He wrote that nationalism is connected with a labor-friendly sense of national identity that appeals to the left’s old constituency, the working class.

And President Donald Trump’s America First agenda is actually provoking unexpected nationalist fervor in Canada, where the indignant class is boycotting American products based on Trump’s tariff policies.

Media Fearmongering about Nationalism Ramped Up with November Election

Nevertheless, accusations persist that Trump and his supporters are promoting “Christian nationalism” supposedly similar to the caricature of a Nazi or “white supremacist” form. 

For example, there have been warnings about the supposed “Christian nationalist” plans of Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget. And how Trump’s “takeover” of the Kennedy Center “has Christian nationalism written all over it.” Several books have been published to regale us of the evils of “white” Christian nationalism, including a recent one that summons activists to harangue family and friends to reject it in favor of woke ideologies.

Clearly, this scaremongering was re-triggered by the 2024 election that sent Trump back to the White House. But American voters were merely reacting to some really bad stuff from the past several years. They only longed to return to the spirit of a God-blessed America. They felt dispossessed and betrayed by those they once trusted to do us no harm.

The lawlessness, pre-dawn armed raids on peaceful protesters, the attacks on free speech, the forced injections, the transing and sexualization of schoolchildren, the insistence that we lie down and take it — all of this was too much to bear. Americans wish to reclaim an identity that is rooted in our national identity and Judeo-Christian values. So they voted to put a stop to the madness.

The Trope of Christian Nationalism Accelerated into Absurdity

Yet a great many pundits scratched their heads that people didn’t vote for more insanity. The propaganda press continues to enlist academics to parse the meaning of “nationalism” and to tell us to trash our heritage and traditions. They enlist woke pastors, who were long ago hijacked by the left, to define “Christian” for every American Christian, and to tell them they’re racist and ignorantTalking heads like Politico’s Heidi Przybyla displayed deep ignorance of our founding documents by telling Americans that our rights don’t come from our creator, but from the government.

The propaganda press kept pointing to absurd “dog whistles” for Christian nationalism. A short list of these supposed symbols of “white Christian nationalism” include the pine tree flagLittle House on the Prairie; the Jerusalem crossHawaiian shirtsphysical fitnessclassic children’s literaturelandscape paintings of the countryside; the entire countryside itself; America’s national parks; and Tiki torches. (Sadly, Tiki Brand Products felt forced to issue a disclaimer.) 

Enough! Americans Are Homesick for their Country

Homesickness is at the heart of what Americans have been feeling. If there is a resurgence of nationalism along with Judeo-Christian values, I believe it means that for a while Americans became lost and forgot who they were and now wish to return home. 

As the late Sir Roger Scruton explained, a sense of nationalism is like the feeling of belonging in a family — where people might have different ideas but are bound together like neighbors with common bonds of loyalty.

So, enough with the propaganda stereotype of Trump voters as skinheads with Hitlerian dreams about “white Christian nationalism” supposedly being installed with his election. Trump voters are generally normal people who simply want to live normal lives in what was once a country that valued common sense. 

As our national songs proclaim, America is our “home sweet home,” a beautiful land blessed by God with goodness and brotherhood. Our national anthem declares America the home of the free and the land of the brave. We pray by song that God would guide her “through the night with the light from above.” We pledge to strive for justice and liberty for all in one nation under God.

Christian nationalism, properly interpreted, is about a renewed ache for the profound sense of belonging Americans once had in America, including the longing for Christian values of forgiveness and redemption and real love — all of which are woven into America’s heritage and founding.

We Just Want Our Country Back

This homesickness, by the way, is not the same as nostalgia, which some might call a desire to turn back the clock to the “good old days.” Americans are all about innovation and moving forward and upward, improving and growing, not going backward. The slogan “Make America Great Again” in this light is the aspiration by the dispossessed to return home and rebuild.

There is a growing awareness that we have been, in many ways, a nation in captivity. As Martin Luther King wrote, “the yearning for freedom eventually manifests itself.” People yearn for freedom because we know in our hearts that it is our birthright, and that right is inalienable.

And the American heart yearns for freedom and a return to that shining city on a hill.


Sick and Tired of the Pronoun Police

Sick and Tired of the Pronoun Police

They/them is tedious.

Karoline Leavitt speaks during a White House press briefing | Andrew Leyden/ZUMA Press/Newscom

Karoline Leavitt (Andrew Leyden/ZUMA Press/Newscom)

The Trump administration has made it clear that they will not respond to emails from reporters who bother to stipulate their preferred pronouns.

"As a matter of policy, we do not respond to reporters with pronouns in their bios," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt toldNew York Times reporter who had asked an unrelated question. Leavitt apparently means business; White House comms staffers have declined to answer several inquiries on this basis, according to the Times.

This is a kind of rebellion against an increasingly common progressive accommodation of gender nonconforming individuals—the idea being that there are some people whose outward gender presentation does not match their self-identification, and if we all adopted the habit of stating our preferred pronouns outright, we would spare these people from having to correct everyone else all the time. Conservatives charge that pronoun listers are overcomplicating a fundamental simple matter: There are just two genders, and in the overwhelming majority of cases, it is perfectly obvious who belongs to which pronouns. On the other hand, sometimes it's not obvious whether you are emailing a man or a woman—some names are gender neutral.

Thus we find ourselves in a situation where a new, empowered conservative movement has taken something that is, charitably speaking, kind of cringe and annoying, and attacked it in a maximally dramatic fashion. It's weird and off-putting to get really worked up about pronoun policing, and it's also weird and off-putting to get worked up about policing pronoun policing. Can everyone calm down?

They/Them

Speaking of people who need to calm down about pronouns… a moment from CNN's town hall with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.) on Wednesday night caught fire on social media. In the clip, an audience participant corrects host Anderson Cooper, who naively assumes the woman (?) goes by she. Instead, the question-asker demands a theypronoun.

What's funny about this exchange is that the subsequent question for Sanders was something along the lines of: How can the Democrats win back various demographic groups—men, minorities, etc.—who are fleeing the party in record numbers? What Democrats really need is an attitude adjustment: It's precisely this condescending, hectoring schoolmarm routine that has so thoroughly repelled voters, particularly young males. Just be normal is an underrated rule of politics. Telling someone you want to be called they/them just strikes a lot of people as abnormal.


Rust Belt Revival

Rust Belt Revival

Charlton Allen @ americanthinker.com



In an era of vacuous soundbites and elitist groupthink, it is rare—almost disorienting—to hear a Treasury Secretary speak plainly about the real America—outside the bounds of Wall Street.

But last week, in an unvarnished interview with Tucker Carlson, Treasury Secretary Bessent did just that. And in doing so, he crystallized the emerging Trump economic doctrine—one rooted not in technocratic abstractions or investor panic but in the lived experiences of working Americans.

I believe that it’s going to work. And I know that what we were doing wasn’t working… I have a high confidence ratio it’s going to work.

This wasn’t bluster. It was long-needed clarity. Bessent wasn’t offering an academic experiment in post-Keynesian theory. He was endorsing a full-throated return to economic realism—backed by the empirical record of President Trump’s first term.

Everyone said none of this was going to work: ‘Oh, the China tariffs are going to cause inflation.’ They didn’t. ‘This is going to hurt working-class Americans.’ Well, guess what? Working-class Americans—hourly workers—did better than supervisory workers.

That sentence should be etched in granite outside the Marriner Eccles building. It is the rarest thing in Washington: truth backed by results. 

Under Trump’s first term, the bottom 50% of American households saw their net worth rise faster than the top 10%.

That was not redistribution by entitlement. It was a recovery of dignity—through work, investment, and national policy aligned with the national interest.

This wasn’t the product of Fabian socialism. It was deliberate, unapologetic economic nationalism—tariffs, industrial policy, energy independence—used to re-anchor prosperity in American hands.

The left loves to cite inequality statistics—until the numbers show that only policies rooted in production, not redistribution, lift the working class. Reindustrialize America. Confront China. Prioritize labor over Wall Street. That’s the formula—and that’s why the left loses interest when it starts working.

For decades, leaders of both parties embraced a trade consensus that drained the industrial Midwest and laundered it through the false promise of “consumer benefit.” The factories vanished. The pensions followed. So did the towns. In exchange, we got cheap socks from Guangzhou and record profits in Manhattan.

The top 10% of Americans own 88% of equities… The bottom 50% has debt. They rent their homes. They have auto loans. We’ve got to give them some relief.

This is the kind of bread-and-butter analysis you won’t hear from the editors of The Atlantic or the suits on CNBC. They’re too busy lamenting minor market tremors to notice a tectonic shift in American economics—one that prioritizes producers over portfolio managers and wage growth over capital gains. Or worse, they’re actively trying to disrupt it.

You won’t hear it from Powell’s Fed either—too busy trying to preserve the globalist–New Keynesian construct that stamps out real wage growth while treating American labor as an inflationary nuisance.

And this marks a massive sea change from the Biden era, which gaslighted the public with inflated job stats and bogus “Bidenomics” slogans, even as grocery bills soared, homeownership collapsed, and food bank lines stretched longer by the week.

By contrast, Bessent offered a doctrine of productive nationalism, where prosperity flows from work, not speculation. Domestic manufacturing, strategic tariffs, and energy sovereignty are not relics but imperatives.

Conservative economics looks like this when it rediscovers its Hamiltonian, Jeffersonian, and Jacksonian roots: production over speculation, sovereignty over surrender, a republic that works for the many—not just the well-connected, well-heeled few.

This framework draws from three distinct schools of American founding thought—Federalist, Republican, and Populist—and is not just historically remarkable. It’s a searing indictment of how unmoored our current economic regime has become from anything authentically American.

Bessent gave perhaps the most devastating illustration in the form of a paradox:

Summer of 2024: Americans took more European vacations than ever before. Same summer: more Americans used food banks than ever before.

The juxtaposition is alarming and true. A bifurcated economy of leisure elites and desperate workers, united only by a collapsing dollar and a silent scream for something better. There are historical analogs for such a chasm—think St. Petersburg in 1917 or Paris in 1789. If left unaddressed, the gulf widens, and it does not end well.

No, we are not there yet, but if economic polarization continues unchecked, it will create fertile soil for cataclysmic disruption. Trump and Bessent are not reacting to that chaos—they are a clarion call to prevent it. Their agenda represents a rare act of economic statesmanshipaimed at restoring national solidarity through production, wages, and sovereignty.

It is a revival of what Abraham Lincoln warned the nation must never forget: that “labor is prior to, and independent of, capital.”

Theirs is not a revolution—it is a reprieve—a final chance to restore equilibrium before history forces its own correction.

Bessent didn’t stop at theory. He went to food banks near his hometown—not for optics, but to hear the truth firsthand:

These were working families who could no longer afford $100 at the grocery store… They were coming to the food bank to top up.

No GDP figure or interest-rate model can explain that away. These weren’t “losers,” as the Democrats’ grotesque “compensate the loser” policy implies. These Americans played by the rules—while the system rigged the rules against them.

I don’t think the bottom 50% of Americans are losers. I think the system hasn’t worked for them. I think they are winners—it’s just a bad system.

This isn’t economic populism. It’s economic patriotism. And it should be a litmus test for anyone claiming to lead a party representing working Americans.

Bessent and Trump are not offering nostalgia. They’re offering a course correction—restoring national sovereignty over our economic destiny.

This is not a 1950s fantasy but a 21st-century doctrine that defends American capital, labor, and industry from a globalist orthodoxy that has produced only misery, dependence, and debt.

Critics, predictably, are clutching their pearls—and their portfolios. Editorials are already being drafted warning of “trade wars,” “market shocks,” and “isolationism.” But the real shock is that anyone still listens to the same people who presided over the dismantling of America’s industrial base.

As Bessent made clear, this administration isn’t afraid of the backlash. They have the receipts—and they have the will.

They want good jobs. They want their kids to do better than they do. They want to own a home. They want to pay down their debt. This isn’t hard.

No, it isn’t. What’s hard is having the courage to say it—and the spine to act on it.

For the first time in decades, we have a Treasury Secretary who understands the stakes—not just the numbers. He’s not here to manage decline. He’s here to reverse it.

And now the blueprint is on the table.



Charlton Allen is an attorney, former chief executive officer, and chief judicial officer of the North Carolina Industrial Commission. He is the founder of the Madison Center for Law & Liberty, Inc., editor of The American Salient, and the host of the Modern Federalist podcast. X: @CharltonAllenNC

Image: Free image, Pixabay license.


New Details Reveal Biden Stonewalled the Investigation Into Trump's Attempted Assassin

Katie Pavlich reporting for Townhall 

The State of Florida has officially filed charges against Ryan Routh, the man who attempted to assassinate President Donald Trump while he was golfing in Palm Beach in September 2024. 

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announced the charges Thursday morning and noted close cooperation between the Department of Justice, led by Attorney General Pam Bondi, and his office on the case. 

"After 206 days of stonewalling by the federal government that stemmed from days of the Biden administration, I am able to now announce that my office is charging Mr. Routh for the attempted first degree murder of President Trump as well as a charge for terrorism," Uthmeier said. "My office, as well as our law enforcement partners were met with major roadblocks in prosecuting this case during Biden's term. Biden and his attorney general sought to frustrate our efforts and block our investigation into the man who crossed into this state and attempted to commit political violence against a Florida resident. Thank God he was unsuccessful."

"We now have a federal government willing to work together to pursue justice," he continued. "We cannot allow justice to be delayed or denied." 

Earlier this week DOJ revealed in a court filing Routh attempted to obtain rocket propelled grenades and other weapons from a contact in Ukraine to use in his plans to murder Trump.