Tuesday, April 8, 2025

Trump’s Tariff Play: The Art of the Economic Reset


Let’s be honest—anytime the word “tariff” shows up in the news, most folks either glaze over or get caught up in the shouting matches about trade wars. But if you strip away the noise, something pretty interesting is happening. President Trump’s approach to tariffs isn’t just some off-the-cuff political move; it’s part of a much bigger strategy aimed at resetting the economic playing field. Let’s walk through it.

Why are these tariffs happening? The simple answer is leverage.

Trump’s worldview, and really his entire economic posture, is built around one foundational belief: America has been getting the short end of the stick in global trade for decades. Whether it’s China flooding the U.S. with cheap goods or Europe slapping taxes on American exports while enjoying free access to our markets, Trump sees an imbalance that needs correction.

Tariffs, in this context, aren’t just taxes on imports. They’re bargaining chips. By imposing tariffs, Trump is essentially saying, “If you want access to the world’s largest consumer market, you’re going to play fair.”

But it goes deeper than that. Trump has consistently targeted China, and not without reason. China’s state-subsidized industries, intellectual property theft, and currency manipulation have tilted the global economic playing field. Tariffs are Trump’s tool to counter that tilt. He’s not afraid to raise costs in the short term if it means forcing China (and others) to come back to the negotiating table.

What else is being done alongside the tariffs? Tariffs are just one prong of a three-part strategy that Trump is quietly piecing together.

First, there’s the push for a massive capital infusion into the U.S. economy. Trump wants to make America the most attractive destination in the world for business investment. By keeping interest rates higher than those of other countries and bringing manufacturing back home, the aim is to redirect global capital flows straight into American businesses, infrastructure, and jobs.

Think of it like this: if you’re raising barriers to cheap imports, you’d better have a plan to build up your own productive capacity. And that’s exactly what Trump is working on behind the scenes—encouraging the reshoring of industries and investment in domestic growth.

Second, Trump is laying the groundwork for more tax cuts. His first term saw historic corporate tax reductions, but he’s not done yet. The goal is simple: make it cheaper to do business in America than anywhere else. Lower taxes give companies more cash to reinvest, hire, and expand. Combine that with tariffs that make foreign goods more expensive, and suddenly, you have a recipe for boosting domestic production.

Third, and this is crucial, there’s a major deregulatory push happening. Trump understands that for businesses to thrive, they need breathing room. Reducing red tape makes it faster and cheaper to start projects, build factories, and innovate. Less regulation means lower costs, quicker timelines, and fewer bureaucratic headaches.

Put it all together, and you see the bigger picture: Trump isn’t just slapping tariffs on steel and electronics. He’s building a broad-based economic strategy that incentivizes investment in America first.

What is the likely outcome?

Now, let’s not sugarcoat this. Tariffs do have immediate downsides. They tend to raise prices for consumers in the short term, and they can spark retaliatory tariffs from other countries. There’s also the risk of short-term supply chain disruptions, as businesses that have become reliant on cheaper imports are forced to adjust. But Trump is betting on a long-term payoff.

If successful, this strategy could lead to a re-industrialization of America. More factories, more jobs, more self-reliance. Supply chains would shift away from China and realign closer to home. America could see a genuine manufacturing revival, something politicians on both sides of the aisle have promised for years but rarely delivered.

The capital infusion Trump is working toward would turbocharge this transformation. If foreign money flows into U.S. factories, energy projects, and technology development, it offsets the short-term pain of higher prices. Pair that with lower taxes and fewer regulations, and you have the makings of a competitive American economy that can stand on its own two feet.

There’s also a geopolitical angle here. By reducing dependence on Chinese manufacturing, Trump is aiming to weaken China’s economic influence over the U.S. and its allies. This isn’t just about economics—it’s about national security. The fewer critical goods we rely on from overseas, the more leverage we regain on the world stage.

At the end of the day, Trump’s tariffs are not an isolated policy. They’re a chess move in a much larger game. He’s aiming to rewrite the rules of global trade, attract massive investment back into the U.S., lower taxes, cut red tape, and reassert American economic dominance. Will it work? That depends on execution, timing, and whether businesses are willing to bet on the American comeback. But one thing is clear: this isn’t accidental. It’s a calculated play to rebuild the American economy from the ground up—and it’s going to have ripple effects for years to come.




X22, And we Know, and more- April 8

 



Tune Out the Media for What Matters


In an age of relentless division and 24/7 news cycles, the media often prioritize sensationalism over substance.  With Donald Trump now serving as the 47th president of the United States after a decisive victory in the 2024 election, Americans have a unique opportunity to cut through the noise, embrace an “America First” ethos, and support policies that prioritize national strength and prosperity.  It is time to judge policies based on their outcomes, not the headlines, and focus on practical solutions rather than partisan rhetoric.  Here’s why — and how — we can make it happen.

Seeing Past the Media’s Filter

Mainstream media thrive on conflict.  Sensational headlines and polarizing narratives dominate the airwaves, often masking the real impact of policies and leadership.  Trump’s current term continues the focus on securing borders, revitalizing the economy, and renegotiating trade deals — policies that delivered success in his first presidency.  However, media coverage often highlights controversies and personal drama rather than tangible results.

During Trump’s first term, the U.S. saw job creation, manufacturing growth, and stronger border enforcement.  Yet the media tended to focus on divisive sound bites rather than these positive outcomes.  To navigate this, Americans must look beyond the noise.  How many jobs are being created?  Are our borders more secure?  Are trade agreements benefiting American workers?  By focusing on measurable outcomes, we can ground ourselves in reality rather than the media’s distorted narratives.

America First: Our Nation, Our Priorities

“America First” is more than a slogan; it’s a commitment to putting American citizens first — safeguarding jobs, securing borders, and fortifying our future.  Trump’s policies reflect this, with an emphasis on domestic manufacturing, border security, and economic independence.  One example is the administration’s focus on combating drug-trafficking and human-smuggling at the southern border.  These measures protect American families from the dangers of illegal drug flows and criminal networks.

Critics often frame “America First” as isolationist, but this perspective misses the point.  A self-reliant America is better equipped to lead globally and negotiate from a position of power.  America’s strength should come from within, ensuring that our industries and workers aren’t undermined by unfair foreign competition or unchecked immigration.

Judging Policies, Not Personalities

Trump’s presidency has been polarizing, and his bold style ensures constant criticism.  However, voters must separate personality from policy.  Whether you agree with his approach or not, the question should be whether his policies deliver results.

Trump’s tax cuts were designed to encourage investment, job creation, and economic growth.  His foreign policy prioritizes U.S. interests, ensuring that resources are used wisely and that international engagements benefit America.  Efforts to streamline government operations and reduce bureaucratic waste are also steps in the right direction.

Trump’s first term saw increased employment, GDP growth, and progress on trade reform.  The challenge for Americans is to look beyond personality-driven narratives and focus on policies that impact our daily lives.

Debunking the “Democracy’s Done” Panic

Critics of Trump often claim that his policies threaten democracy, focusing on tax cuts, spending reductions, and resistance to expanding social programs.  These critics warn that such measures disproportionately benefit the wealthy while weakening essential programs like Social Security and Medicaid.

Let’s examine these claims.  Trump’s tax cuts aimed to stimulate economic growth by encouraging businesses to invest and hire, potentially leading to higher wages and more job opportunities.  Spending cuts were intended to reduce government inefficiency and curb waste — not dismantle the social safety net.

Trump’s first term saw an expanding economy, declining unemployment, and rising wages, particularly for blue-collar workers.  These outcomes contradict the dire predictions of his critics.  Claims that his agenda undermines democracy lack evidence.  The real threat to democracy lies not in Trump’s policies, but in divisive rhetoric that hinders constructive dialogue.  By rejecting fear-mongering, we can focus on practical policies that promote national unity and prosperity.

A Call for Unity through Pragmatism

America is a diverse nation, and disagreements are inevitable.  Yet even in times of division, there are common goals: a strong economy, national security, and opportunities for future generations.  Trump’s leadership offers an opportunity to unite around these shared objectives, provided we look past distractions and focus on results.

The media will continue to fixate on Trump’s every move, amplifying praise and criticism alike.  But citizens don’t need to engage with the spectacle.  Instead, we should evaluate policies based on tangible outcomes.  Are jobs returning to American communities?  Are our borders more secure?  Is the U.S. better positioned on the global stage?  These are the questions that matter.

By embracing the “America First” mindset and rejecting divisive narratives, we can foster unity and drive positive change.  This approach is about prioritizing policies that benefit all Americans, not supporting one leader or party blindly.

The Takeaway

The narrative that “democracy is doomed” may dominate the headlines, but it’s not grounded in reality.  The real challenge lies in our collective ability to filter out distractions and prioritize progress.  With Trump in the White House, there’s an opportunity to build a stronger, more prosperous America — provided we stay focused on the bigger picture.

A secure, thriving nation is a goal we can all support.  By backing practical policies and rejecting divisive rhetoric, we can move forward together.  After all, it’s not about one man — it’s about one nation.  Let’s keep our eyes on what truly matters.



J.D. Vance just destroyed Democrats with these six brutal words about illegal immigrants

 


Three Key Takeaways:

  • Vice President J.D. Vance slammed Democrats for their outrage over the deportation of MS-13 gang member Kilmar Abrego Garcia, accusing them of prioritizing illegal immigrants over the victims of violent crimes.
  • Vance emphasized that Garcia was a known gang member with a criminal record, including traffic violations and failure to attend court dates, which justified his deportation under U.S. immigration law.
  • He criticized Democrats for caring more about the deportation of gang members than about the deaths of U.S. citizens, highlighting the stark contrast in their reactions to the safety of American citizens versus illegal immigrants.
_____________________________________________

J.D. Vance isn’t taking any prisoners when it comes to the illegal immigration debate.

Democrats are furious at the Trump administration’s latest move.

And J.D. Vance just destroyed Democrats with these six brutal words about illegal immigrants.

Vice President calls out Democrats’ “disgraceful set of priorities”

Vice President J.D. Vance ripped into Democrats and their media allies on Fox News’ Fox & Friends after they melted down over the Trump administration deporting alleged MS-13 gang member Kilmar Abrego Garcia.

The Vice President didn’t mince words during his sit-down with Lawrence Jones on Thursday.

“We do not ask permission from far-left Democrats before we deport illegal immigrants. We do the American people’s business,” Vance fired back when asked about the controversy.

The former Ohio Senator then dropped a truth bomb that left Democrats sputtering.

“This is such a weird, mistaken placement of priorities. . . What is it about Congressional Democrats that they get more angry at deporting violent gang members than they do at the victims of those violent gang members?” Vance asked.

“I don’t even understand where they’re coming from. They’ve gone off the deep end, and they’ve got to come back to reality,” he added.

Democrats have been in full meltdown mode since The Atlantic reported that federal attorneys acknowledged an “administrative error” in sending Garcia to El Salvador’s notorious CECOT prison.

The facts about the MS-13 deportation speak for themselves

Vance shut down the left-wing narrative that Garcia was just an innocent man caught up in Trump’s deportation machine.

“Back in 2019, an immigration judge looked at all the evidence, looked at the data and concluded that this allegedly innocent person that we sent to El Salvador was actually a member of an MS-13 gang,” Vance explained.

The Vice President pointed out that Garcia’s record was far from clean.

“He had also committed some traffic violations. He had not shown up for some court dates. This is not exactly ‘Father of the Year’ here. This is a person that we don’t think should be in our country,” Vance said.

Even the left-wing press couldn’t dispute the basic facts, Vance noted.

“Whatever the argument is, whatever the justification is. . . Not even the crazy left-wing media criticized the idea that we could deport this person. They just took issue with the reasoning for why we deported this person,” he said.

“This [is] unquestionably a person an immigration judge had found had zero right to be in the United States of America,” Vance concluded. Democrats care more about illegal MS-13 members than murdered Americans


Democrats’ outrage over Garcia’s deportation stands in stark contrast to their silence about Americans killed by illegal immigrants.

Vance hammered them for showing more sympathy toward illegal immigrants than for murdered U.S. citizens like Georgia nursing student Laken Riley and Texas native Jocelyn Nungaray.

Court filings show Garcia came to the U.S. in 2011 at age 16, claiming he fled gang threats in El Salvador. Eight years later, a judge granted him protected status known as “withholding of removal.”

But the Trump administration isn’t backing down.

During the interview, Vance also swatted away rumors that Elon Musk might soon leave his role in the administration, calling such reports “total fake news.”

The Vice President’s forceful defense of deportation policies sends a clear message that the Trump White House won’t be swayed by left-wing outrage as it continues implementing its tough stance on immigration.


Source: 

Conservative Underground News - Exposing the truth the mainstream media hides


Reclaiming Cultural Literacy

Reclaiming Cultural Literacy

“Keep people from their history and they are more easily controlled.” - Karl Marx

President Donald Trump signed an executive order recently calling for the dismantling of the Department of Education (a process that will still require an act of Congress), leaving his critics aghast and hyperbolically claiming that he is trying to end education itself in America. In fact, he is trying to rescue it.

The order states that “the experiment of controlling American education through Federal programs and dollars — and the unaccountable bureaucracy those programs and dollars support — has plainly failed our children, our teachers, and our families.”

Indeed it has. The White House noted that the DoE has spent over $3 trillion since President Jimmy Carter created the Department in 1979, “with virtually no measurable improvement in student achievement.” The Nation’s Report Card revealed that math and reading scores are at the lowest level in decades; six-in-ten fourth graders and nearly three-quarters of eighth graders are not proficient in math; seven-in-ten fourth and eighth graders lack reading proficiency; and 40 percent of fourth grade students don’t even meet basic reading levels. Standardized test scores have remained flat for decades, and in math, U.S. students rank 28th out of 37 member-countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

The decline of American education isn’t entirely the fault of a bloated federal bureaucracy, however, or even of the ideological capture of our educational institutions. Arguably more damaging has been a culture of techno-distraction since at least the 1960s, culminating today in the ubiquity of smart phones among even young schoolchildren. Experts have warned for decades of the mentally debilitating effects of the aptly-named “boob tube,” but the addictive, bottomless pit of internet scrolling and social media obsession makes complaints of “too much TV” seem quaint.

A schoolteacher posted a TikTok video recently describing her disheartening experience with the state of public education. She laments that the students “live on their phones” which feed them a “constant stream of dopamine” from morning to night. In class, without their phones they are like addicts suffering withdrawal – “vacant,” with no ability to focus unless the teacher conveys information “packaged in short little clips.” Their eyes are open, she says, but “they’re not there, and they have a level of apathy that I’ve never seen before.” It’s as if “you are interacting with them in between hits of the internet, which is their real life.”

As a teacher of teens in a homeschooling community, I can vouch for the impact this culture of distraction has had even on homeschooled kids, who tend to be less swept up in pop culture than their public school peers. But perhaps even more concerning than their attention deficit is their deficit of “cultural literacy” – a term coined by educator E.D. Hirsch, Jr., author of the influential 1988 book Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know. “To be culturally literate,” Hirsch wrote, “is to possess the basic information needed to thrive in the modern world. The breadth of that information is great, extending over the major domains of human activity from sports to science.”

In his book, Hirsch compiled a list of over 5000 notable names both fictional (Iago) and real (Houdini), places both fictional (Valhalla) and real (Waterloo), scientific terms (absolute zero), titles of books (Pride and Prejudice) and works of art (the Sistine Chapel), history-making battles (Valley Forge), common phrases (fiddling while Rome burns) and maxims (Gather ye rosebuds while ye may), and much more, which he argued that every American should know.

Hirsch wrote, “Only by accumulating shared symbols, and the shared information that the symbols represent, can we learn to communicate effectively with one another in our national community.”

With the rise of a culture of mass entertainment from the mid-twentieth century on, our children’s familiarity with such shared symbols and information began to unravel. Centuries-old touchstones like the Bible, Shakespeare, and other cultural icons began to be replaced by TV shows and pop stars, and then eventually by “memes” which, while entertaining, are by their very nature ephemeral and tied to specific cultural moments. Ten years from now, or even five, it is likely that none of today’s memes will be recognizable; they certainly will not have the same meaningful depth to connect us as the items listed in Hirsch’s book.

As our cultural literacy declined, so has our cultural unity. Having failed to ground our children’s minds in what the English poet Matthew Arnold called “the best that has been thought and said” in our civilization, we have deprived them of any connection to that grand legacy – indeed, they have little if any connection to the past at all. Man-on-the-street videos abound on the internet in which young people, even adults, cannot answer basic questions about history such as who fought in the Civil War, or in which century the Declaration of Independence was signed. Younger generations now live in the eternal present of pop culture, focused only on the now, the new, and the what’s next.

I ask my students why they should even bother to read great books or learn history at all, and they dutifully offer the standard reasons they think I’m looking for, such as “It opens your mind,” it “increases your attention span,” and “Those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it.”

These are valid reasons, and I add that being able to position themselves in the great sweep of history and to appreciate the great achievements of their cultural heritage draws them closer to the True, the Good, and the Beautiful. It enlarges one’s soul and binds us in our common humanity. That’s not a message one gets very often from pop culture.

Then I hit them with an important reason none of them ever thinks of: young people who do not read books or know their history will one day become more easily manipulated and lied to by demagogues. They will be more easily drawn into the web of totalitarians who understand that severing young people from their cultural legacy leaves them intellectually, morally, and spiritually unfortified to resist. “Take away a nation’s heritage and they are more easily persuaded,” wrote The Communist Manifesto co-author Karl Marx. “Keep people from their history and they are more easily controlled.”

With the debate over education currently raging, we have an opportunity not just to jettison a bureaucracy and an ideological agenda that have failed our children. Now is the moment to revive a focus on the cultural literacy that connects each new generation to our civilization’s grand, unifying heritage, one that will bequeath to them the wisdom and humility, the beauty and morality, and the aspiration and purpose they need to flourish.

Reprinted from Intellectual Takeout with the permission of The Fred & Rheta Skelton Center for Cultural Renewal.


🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


The Trump Administration Should Focus on Deregulation, Not Tariffs

The Trump Administration Should Focus on Deregulation, Not Tariffs

Freed of regulatory deadweight, Americans will be in a much better position to compete with the world.

President Donald Trump signs an executive order in the Rose Garden imposing import tariffs on the rest of the world. | Andrew Leyden/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom

(Andrew Leyden/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom)

President Donald Trump's justifications for tariffs keep shifting—one moment they're to cut the flow of illegal drugs and immigrants, the next, they're to bolster American businesses and jobs. But the argument that seems to resonate most with the public is that they will result in a stronger and more competitive U.S. economy. Economists aren't convinced, to put it mildly. The fact is that American government is often the biggest impediment to the workers and employers that politicians claim to be helping.

"Large and persistent annual U.S. goods trade deficits have led to the hollowing out of our manufacturing base [and] resulted in a lack of incentive to increase advanced domestic manufacturing capacity," Trump argued in an April 2 executive order imposing stiff tariffs on most of the planet. "President Trump is working to level the playing field for American businesses and workers by confronting the unfair tariff disparities and non-tariff barriers imposed by other countries."

Barriers To Trade Come From Our Own Government

But what if the most insurmountable barriers for domestic businesses and the jobs they create come not from foreign governments but from homegrown regulators trying to mold the economy into their preferred form? In fact, entrepreneurs and executives at established firms complain bitterly about the costs of pleasing elected officials and government employees who create red tape instead of prosperity.

"Considering all federal regulations, all sectors of the U.S. economy and all firm sizes, federal regulations cost an estimated $12,800 per employee per year in 2022 (in 2023 dollars). Small firms with fewer than 50 employees incur regulatory costs of $14,700 per employee per year – 20% greater than the cost per employee in large firms ($12,200)," according to a 2023 study commissioned by the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) as a continuation of earlier work by the authors for the U.S. Small Business Administration's Office of Advocacy.

That's bad enough. But if you're concerned about domestic manufacturing, you should know that the situation is even tougher for companies that make things: "The regulatory cost disadvantage confronting small firms is amplified greatly in the manufacturing sector, with small manufacturing firms bearing more than double the cost of large manufacturing firms, or $50,100 versus $24,800 per employee."

For all firms, economic regulations were the most burdensome—followed by environmental regulations, then tax compliance, and occupational safety and health and homeland security (OSHHS) rules. For firms with fewer than 50 employees, environmental regulations had the greatest costs.

In the manufacturing sector, environmental rules imposed the greatest expense for firms of all sizes (over 80 percent of the total for firms with fewer than 50 employees), followed by economic rules, OSHHS, and then tax compliance.

"Federal and state requirements establish mandates for every element of the manufacturing process: the employees, machinery, methods, inputs and waste," according to a separate 2017 NAM report.

American companies are strangling in red tape imposed by American government. Unsurprisingly, small businesses in particular say that heavy regulation is a killer.

Growing Regulatory Burdens Especially Worry Small Businesses

"The latest Small Business Index survey finds that 51% of small businesses say navigating regulatory compliance requirements is negatively impacting their growth," the U.S. Chamber of Commerce revealed in December 2024. "Almost as many (47%) say their business spends too much time fulfilling regulatory compliance requirements."

The percentage of small businesses saying they spend too much time on regulatory compliance rises to 51 percent of manufacturers—and 57 percent for professional services.

Unfortunately, this isn't a new barrier to creating and growing successful companies. In 2018, Gallup found that among small businesses, "more owners mention issues relating to government policies and regulations (24%) than any other" challenge.

In 2011, "small-business owners in the United States are most likely to say complying with government regulations (22%) is the most important problem facing them today," also according to Gallup.

Given governments' tendency to intrude ever more deeply into human life and to find new justifications for bureaucrats' salaries, it should be no surprise that regulatory costs rise year after year.

"Our research shows that regulatory compliance costs of US businesses have grown by about 1 percent each year from 2002 to 2014 in real terms," Francesco Trebbi, Miao Ben Zhang, and Michael Simkovic wrote in a 2024 Cato Institute research brief.

One percent per year in growing compliance costs may not sound like a lot, but that compounds over time into an increasingly more oppressive tangle of red tape that firms must deal with. That hampers large firms, frustrates mid-size ones, and keeps many small businesses from ever getting off the ground.

Shift Gears to Deregulation

Before starting a trade war with the rest of the planet, the Trump administration should strongly consider getting the U.S. government out of the way of American businesses so they can build, innovate, employ, and compete with the foreign firms that so worry U.S. politicians.

There are encouraging signs the Trump administration is friendly to that goal. The first Trump administration left office after "adding a net total of $40.4 billion in regulatory costs," which was less than 10 percent of the net burden imposed by the previous Obama administration, according to the American Action Forum. "When removing independent agencies, the Trump Administration actually achieved net regulatory savings of nearly $1 billion over its term."

That is, Trump at least slowed the regulatory state and may have slightly reduced its burden.

Last month, with Trump back in office, the Treasury Department dropped enforcement of burdensome "beneficial ownership" reporting rules that were causing confusion and concern for small businesses.

"NFIB has been steadfast since the beginning that this onerous requirement is a massive intrusion into small businesses' privacy and creates an unprecedented new government database on Americans," responded National Federation of Independent Business President Brad Close. "We agree with President Trump that requirements from the Corporate Transparency Act are 'outrageous and invasive.'"

For his second term, President Trump has signaled that deregulation is priority. A January 31 executive order requires that "for each new regulation issued, at least 10 prior regulations be identified for elimination" as part of an effort "to significantly reduce the private expenditures required to comply with Federal regulations."

Deregulation is where the Trump administration should focus its efforts, not tariffs. Once freed of regulatory deadweight, Americans will be in a much better position to compete with the world.


Man Imposes Tariffs As Wife Racks Up Huge Trade Deficit At Target

 Man Imposes Tariffs As Wife Racks Up Huge Trade Deficit At Target

Family·Apr 8, 2025 · BabylonBee.com

PHOENIX, AZ — In a move intended to fix what experts cited as a years-long imbalance, a local man announced that he was imposing tariffs after his wife had racked up a huge trade deficit at Target.

Eric Harper said that, while he had warned his wife for years that the current Target arrangement was unsustainable, her stubborn insistence upon maintaining a substantial deficit left him no choice but to implement tariffs.

"This household simply can't afford to be taken advantage of forever," Harper said. "I'm large, successful, and prosperous, but that doesn't mean I should be treated like everyone's piggy bank. These tariffs are a way to shift the balance back into a more equitable position. While there may be short-term pain, there will be long-term progress. And, Lord willing, a lot fewer trips to Target."

Harper's wife, Jenna, expressed strong disapproval of the new tariffs. "This is unacceptable and a complete upending of the long-established system," she said. "If Eric insists on imposing these tariffs, there are sure to be dire consequences — both immediate and long into the future. It is not right for future generations of the Harper family to suffer from Eric's bullying power play. I vow to fight these tariffs to the end."

Though each side reportedly agreed to send a delegation to engage in high-level talks at a summit this weekend in hopes of negotiating an acceptable compromise, sources said Eric was unwilling to budge.

At publishing time, news broke that Jenna Harper was planning to impose an immediate laundry embargo to counter Eric's tariffs.