Wednesday, April 2, 2025

Upheaval and Pushback

Le Bataillon Carré (Julien Le Blant, 1880)

As pointed out by Victor Davis Hanson, Trumpism is not so much an expression of a revolution as a counter-revolution. However, the movement is truly in the nature of an insurrection. It is fueled by a fierce anger that has built up from coast to coast since the creeping attacks on national institutions — and identity — during the Obama years.

Another insurrection took place in France in the period 1793–96. At that time, the country was in turmoil as a result of the Parisian revolution which had dismantled constitutive rules and institutions of society, including the Catholic Church, and replaced them with an ideology-obsessed tyranny.

Led by conceited young men unversed in family responsibilities but seduced by romantic philosophy and metaphysical studies, the French Revolution became the prototype of a post-Enlightenment break with Judeo-Christian ethics and the introduction of equally far-fetched and deceptive promises of “universal equality”. The mere form of address “citizen”, which was to apply to everybody in the utopian thousand-year empire, whether they lived in the gutter or held a position in the tribunals sending people to the guillotine, was no less hypocritical than the “comrade” of later times.

Like all other revolutions that followed in Europe and beyond, the French one ended in a cannibalistic orgy, with fractioned revolutionaries conspiring against each other and losing themselves in a disillusioned mafia-like struggle for power.

The “War in the Vendée” is the historical term for the popular uprising that broke out in the western province of France as a reaction to the arbitrary dictates of the revolution. Local insurgents formed a “Catholic and Royal Army” that fought successfully against the Republican forces in the spring and summer of 1793. During the autumn of that year, however, the tide of war turned. Finally, the counter-revolutionary army was defeated before Christmas.

After the defeat on the battlefield, in the spring of 1794, the Committee of Public Safety took revenge on the people. An estimated 15,000 people were massacred in the cities. With a sadistic ingenuity that was later surpassed by Bolsheviks and Nazis, they were shot, drowned, or beheaded. In the countryside, between 20,000 and 50,000 civilians were massacred. As an inspiration to future generations of revolutionaries, the Republican forces adopted a tactic of burning towns and villages to the ground.

The brutality of the repression backfired. In the autumn of 1794 and the spring of 1795, scattered hostilities broke out despite peace negotiations. After the invasion of France by émigré counter-revolutionary forces on the Quiberon peninsula in June 1795, which failed despite great expectations, the remaining leaders of the Vendée insurrection were captured and executed. Historians estimate that as many as 200,000 people from Vendée (between 20 and 25% of the local population) sacrificed their lives fighting against the revolution.

As is well known, history does not repeat itself as if it were subject to mysterious, transcendental forces. However, man is the same from century to century. It is precisely the stability of human nature, the existence of common dispositions and impulses, that leads to hasty conclusions about the “cyclical phases” of history.

There are striking parallels between the events of the French Revolution and its Russian counterpart. In both cases, on the one hand, there were revolutionary forces trying to reshape an entire country, gripped by utopian fantasies, whatever the human cost, and on the other hand, counter-revolutionary forces fighting to roll back the revolution and restore order. In Russia, the “Whites” suffered the same tragic fate as the insurgents of Vendée.

What has attracted relatively little attention, considering the severity of the cultural impact in our society, is the struggle between the forces that have driven the “woke” revolution and the counter-revolutionary forces that fight for the values ​​that underpin Western civilization. Many imagine that “woke” simply stands for (ridiculously) exaggerated “humanism” and “tolerance”. However, that is a monumental fallacy. It denotes in reality one side — the dark one, to be sure — in a life-and-death struggle between totalitarianism and freedom.

Under the guise of humanism, Democrats have been working to reshape the United States ever since Lyndon B. Johnson’s immigration bill of 1965. Although with the resemblance of a bitter parody, in this case too, it is as if there is a fantasy of a thousand-year empire guaranteed, not by the presence of enlisted savages with bayonets in the streets, but by the steady influx of immigrants dependent on public benefits and with the prospective right to vote in general elections.

Under Biden, the development assumed almost apocalyptic proportions. However, that is usually the case under revolutionary excesses that have no other purpose than to secure the power of the political elite. — Somebody must ask themselves the pressing question: Who is truly willing to jeopardize the welfare and integrity of their nation — and, ultimately, the lives of their compatriots — in order to stay in power?

The reality is that the United States has had its own piecemeal revolution since Obama came to power in 2009. In a civilized society like the American one, where people generally trust legislators, judges, and executive authorities, many have long been reluctant to stand up to them. However, as absurdities and injustices have become increasingly obvious, not least the socially devastating mass immigration from the South, people across the country have begun to sense danger and fear for the future of their children.

Unfortunately, Marxism did not die with the Soviet Union in 1991, but lives on in disguise. Its goal, however, is the same as before: the destruction of Western civilization. In recent years, it has attacked its enemy in subtler ways than before, weaponizing ethnic and sexual minorities, and is constantly seeking new strategic alliances in political movements of importance, e.g. Islamism. At its core, therefore, it is as totalitarian, anti-human, and evil as ever. Revolution is a bloody affair. It begins with boundless dreams and promises, but invariably ends in “terror”. Justice, of course, has nothing to do with it.

In recent months, liberal American news media have finally found the time to reflect and ask themselves why they covered up obvious signs of cognitive decline in the Democratic president. However, the self-examination has not yet extended to critically questioning the coverage of the George Floyd affair and the unrest that followed in its wake.

While a majority of Americans watched in silence, entire cities were ravaged by politically motivated rioters and vandals. As the world later witnessed sadistic atrocities committed by Islamists against Jewish civilians in Israel, the opportunistic alliance of Marxists and Islamists entered the public eye. While taking over American universities, masked “protesters” joined the anti-Semitic tradition that once culminated in the Holocaust.

Since Obama, Americans have endured a revolution intended to dissolve any sense of national identity, cut it off from Western civilization, and drown it in multiculturalism, with invading masses of Third-World aliens acting as unwitting accomplices. The project has been truly revolutionary — all-encompassing and nihilistic.

It was not a given that Trump should win the November 2024 election. He did, however. And in doing so, he gave voice to all the decent people of the country who, for years on end, saw their national pride trampled and dishonored by hostile forces rooted in Marxism and other anti-Christian ideologies. Undoubtedly, he will unleash the righteous anger that has gripped the Americans, as it once gripped the brave counter-revolutionaries of the Vendée. Not to forget: It is a fight to the death!

Faced with a lurking, uncompromising enemy of everything we hold dear, we cannot take victory for granted because we have justice on our side, but must fight until victory is truly won. As Trump shouted to the crowd during the Pennsylvania campaign rally: “Fight, fight, fight!” Victory is the condition for the restoration of civilization.

American politics, not to mention European, has long been characterized by leaders who dared not stand up for Western civilization in an unequivocal way. At last, however, Americans may declare to the rest of the world where anti-Western forces are constantly on the lookout for signs of weakness:

You shall know us by our resolve.”



X22, And we Know, and more- April 2nd

 



0:00 / 0:00

15 seconds

15 seconds

About That Third Term


In the ever-turbulent arena of American politics, the specter of double standards looms large. Recent uproar over President Donald Trump's musings about a potential third term starkly contrasts with the muted reactions to former President Barack Obama's similar contemplations. This glaring inconsistency not only exposes media bias but also underscores a troubling trend of selective outrage that undermines the very fabric of our democratic discourse.

On March 30, 2025, President Trump, during a candid interview with NBC News, hinted at exploring avenues for a third term, stating, “There are methods which you could do it.” He went further, saying, “I’m not joking,” signaling a serious consideration of the idea.

Cue the media meltdown. Legacy outlets like The Guardian ran dramatic headlines warning of impending authoritarianism. The Atlantic declared it a “democracy-altering” threat. Pundits tripped over each other racing to call it "fascist." Legal scholars popped up like prairie dogs quoting the 22nd Amendment, which since 1951 has barred presidents from serving more than two terms. Jeremy Paul, a constitutional law professor at Northeastern University, told CBS News, “There are no credible legal arguments for him to run for a third term.”

The backlash was immediate, relentless, and hysterical. Trump was painted as a madman who would bulldoze the Constitution just to stay in power.

But let’s rewind to July 28, 2015. President Barack Obama, addressing the African Union in Ethiopia, said, “I actually think I’m a pretty good president. I think if I ran, I could win. But I can’t.” The crowd laughed. The press chuckled. Late-night hosts applauded. It was treated as harmless self-flattery.

Fast forward to December 2020. Obama sat down with Stephen Colbert and joked about orchestrating a “third term” through a puppet president. “If I could make an arrangement where I had a stand-in, a front man or front woman, and they had an earpiece in and I was just in my basement in my sweats looking through the stuff… I'd be fine with that,” he said.

Well guess what? He did exactly that.

Enter Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. A man who “ran” for president in 2020 mostly from his Delaware basement, was elected with the help of the most coordinated media, tech, and establishment machine in modern history, and promptly started signing executive orders so fast his own hand couldn’t keep up—because, in many cases, it wasn’t even him. Reporters asked about executive orders his team put in front of him and he literally said, "I don't know what I'm signing."

That wasn’t a presidency. That was the Obama third term playbook—with Biden as the willing proxy, the empty vessel, the guy with the metaphorical earpiece in, while the Obama team ran the show behind the scenes. They repopulated the West Wing with familiar faces from 2009-2016. Susan Rice, Ron Klain, Jake Sullivan, Jen Psaki—Obama’s bench was back in action, while Biden doddered out for scripted remarks and photo ops.

And when the Obama crew decided Biden was no longer useful heading into 2024—he was out. Like a light. Faster than fast. The same press corps that carried him across the finish line in 2020 suddenly had no interest in covering for him. Leaks came from “within the party,” murmurs turned to headlines, and just like that, Obama’s earpiece presidency was over.

That’s not conspiracy. That’s observable reality.

And here’s the kicker: nobody called that an assault on democracy. Nobody cited the 22nd Amendment. Nobody panicked over constitutional violations. Because the guy pulling the strings was their guy. Because the team running the White House didn’t have an “R” next to their names.

So let’s call this what it is: a blatant double standard. If you're a Democrat, especially one with a cult of personality and media halo like Obama, you can joke about a third term, execute it through a front man, and get praised for your brilliance. If you’re Donald Trump and you mention it out loud? You're an autocrat, a dictator, a constitutional threat.

This is the problem. It's not about the Constitution anymore—it's about control. It's not about protecting democracy—it's about preserving power for one side. The real threat to the Republic isn’t Trump musing about a third term—it’s a media-political complex that lets one president actually run one.

So yes, let’s talk about that third term. Let’s talk about the one we just lived through. Because when Obama joked about having a front man in an earpiece, he wasn’t kidding. His name was Joe Biden—and we all watched it happen.



Touching: Libs Spell Out 'Coexist' With Burning Teslas

Touching: 

Libs Spell Out 'Coexist' With Burning Teslas

image0.jpeg

SEATTLE, WA — In a beautiful, heartwarming call for universal peace, liberals took several stolen, burning Teslas and arranged them to spell out "Coexist."

The fires burned for hours, sending massive plumes of smoke into the air, a signal to the world of the progressive desire for people of all backgrounds to live in harmony with each other.

"These torched cars show how serious we are about tolerance," explained local liberal Geoffrey Wendt. "Every firebomb we throw is a call for us to love and accept our neighbors, regardless of their beliefs or background. Can you smell that burning gasoline? That's the sweet smell of peaceful coexistence with all mankind."

Conservatives across the country instantly saw the error of their ways after witnessing the beautiful message spelled out in flames. "Wow. Maybe we really can live together in unity," said local man Bill Patton, as he watched his Tesla being burned. "It seemed like we were so divided as a nation. But, as I was dragged from car and beaten with a pipe, I finally began to realize that peace is possible."

At publishing time, liberals had sent another poignant message by spelling out "Justice" with the bodies of assassinated CEOs.


🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


With Friends Like These: Book Claims Obama Worked Behind Scenes to Kneecap Kamala's Presidential Chances


Bob Hoge reporting for RedState 

If you’re a Democrat these days, it must be tough knowing who to trust. We saw Rep. Nancy Pelosi (CA) team up with Sen. Chuck Schumer (NY) to nuke Joe Biden’s reelection effort and force him out of the race, we saw actor George Clooney write an op-ed calling for Ole Joe to step down, and we saw Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (NY) stay as far away as he could from the then-commander-in-chief.

These are all longtime friends and supporters of the former president, but when the going got tough, the weak got going.

Another figure who was behind the scenes figuratively stabbing Biden in the back was his one-time boss, former President Barack Obama, who in private voiced his doubts about Biden’s mental capacities and who many feel encouraged Clooney to write that devastating op-ed.

It turns out Obama wasn’t just kneecapping Biden—he also reportedly worked to derail Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign before it even started. The unsurprising but still telling information comes from a forthcoming book by reporter and author James Allen called “FIGHT: Inside the Wildest Battle for the White House," and he alleges that Obama didn’t want Harris to get the spot and worked for an open primary:

"President Obama absolutely did not think that Joe Biden should continue, according to our sources close to President Obama," Allen told MSNBC. "And he also didn’t want Kamala Harris to be the replacement for Biden. He didn’t think that she was the best choice for Democrats, and he worked really behind the scenes for a long time to try to have a mini-primary, or an open convention, or a mini-primary leading to an open convention, did not have faith in her ability to win the election…"

"As it turned out, she didn’t win, but he was really working against her," Allen continued.

Allen also appeared on Fox News with Jesse Watters Monday and made similar remarks:

The tweet continues:

The author of “Fight: Inside the Wildest Battle for the White House” gives Primetime an inside look into the innermost American Democrat circle. Jonathan Allen says Biden thought he was going to take a victory lap once he stepped down, but @BarackObama had other plans and did NOT want Kamala installed as the nominee.


Also In The Book: White House Aides Had a ‘Death Pool’ Plan for Biden, And They Guided Him Around With Neon Reflective Tape on the Floor

Another Hilarious Excerpt in the Book is the One About Kamala and 'Chairs' That Proves Just How Lucky Americans Are That She Lost


Perhaps Obama’s most notable undercutting of Harris came just after Biden agreed to step down. Although the then-president quickly endorsed Harris as his successor, Barack and Michelle at first refused and then waited a full five days to follow suit. Five days might not sound like a lot, but it was a crucial time, and it caused many to question whether Harris was qualified for the job (hint: she wasn't). That move alone might have sealed the deal for her eventual loss.

Too little, too late, Obamas (and unbelievably cringe):

One thing I know for sure, I would not want to be in a foxhole with any of these folks. More and more information keeps coming out about something we already knew: craven Democrats would do and did do just about anything, to anyone, to keep their grip on power in '24.

Luckily for all of us, they failed.



The Party of Men Who Think They’re Women Decides to Stay the Course

The Party of Men Who Think They’re Women Decides to Stay the Course

What could possibly go wrong for the party of blue-haired, angry Marxists?

What could possibly go wrong for the party of blue-haired, angry Marxists? They know they’re right. They know they’re righteous. They know their opponents are evil, racist fascists. So what if they’ve lost an election or two? They’re on the side of history, you benighted fools! To change course now would be to jump to the wrong side of history, and history hates when you do that! And so the Democrats have decided, after the American electorate decisively rejected the noxious stew they’re selling, to serve up more of the same.

Politico reported Friday that the Democratic National Committee held a major meeting not long after the Convicted Felon, the Emmanuel Goldstein of 2015-2025 (and counting), the focus of evil in the modern world, Orange Man Bad himself, took office again. The ostensible reason for the meeting was to vet candidates for the DNC leadership position, but it was really an opportunity for Democrat top dogs to do some soul-searching and decide which way their party would turn next.

The Democrat Party, whatever else it was, used to be adaptable to circumstances. In 1968, it went down to defeat with presidential candidate Hubert Humphrey, who supported the war in Vietnam. As the war grew increasingly unpopular, the Democrats moved farther to the left (which is always easy for them) and nominated the antiwar Sen. George McGovern in 1972. When McGovern’s far-left candidacy went down in flames, the party moved back toward the center by going with southern Democrat Jimmy Carter in 1976.

All that, however, was a long, long time ago. Now the party of Andrew Jackson and FDR is in the grip of hardline leftist ideologues who seem to care more about adherence to the far-left line than about electoral viability. All the party’s old ability to adapt has been lost; to change course now would apparently make one a class traitor, or a racist, or a fascist, or whatever the left’s favorite term for those it fears and hates is these days.

Even Politico’s Holly Otterbein was disgusted, stating with startling frankness that the Democrats have become a parody of themselves, likening a moment early in the meeting when one DNC leadership candidate broke into song to “a scene from ‘Portlandia,’ a comedy satirizing ultra-liberals (pictured above) — and it was a punchline that was clipped and replayed across social media in the days ahead. Things only got more surreal, and viral, from there.”

The aspiring DNC leaders, Otterbein wrote, “inadvertently showcased the party’s self-absorbed tendencies that strategists argue have driven away swing voters, by turns fixating on identity politics, displaying scorn for large swaths of the electorate and failing to focus on the pocketbook concerns of ordinary Americans.” They never dared approach the topic of whether Kamala Harris had not run a perfect campaign. They likewise ignored the open border, skyrocketing inflation, and all the other issues that made voters want to throw the Dems out in the first place.

As is generally true at Marxist and neo-Marxist gatherings, ideological purity was strictly enforced. MSNBC’s Jonathan Capehart asked the leadership candidates: “How many of you believe that racism and misogyny played a role in Vice President Harris’ defeat?” Each candidate raised his or her or xis hand, whereupon Capehart passed up an opportunity to call them all crazy and tell them that they needed to remove their ideological blinkers. Instead, he stated magisterially: “That’s good. You all pass.” Whew!

A DNC member asked the candidates: “Will you pledge to appoint more than one transgender person to an at-large seat?” Seven of the eight candidates readily affirmed that they would do so, and the eighth was condemned as a heretic and burned at the stake. Okay, I’m exaggerating about that last part. But only a little.

The aspiring Democrat leaders also described Trump as a “fascist who espoused white supremacist conspiracies.” Telling half the country’s population that they’re evil people is hardly a winning strategy, and Politico climbed up onto a ledge of its own, despondently surveying the DNC leadership candidates and alleging that “the spectacle appalled many dyed-in-the-wool Democrats — and deepened the sense that party leaders were not up for the moment.”

Politico even quoted an anonymous “Democratic strategist” saying: “I don’t know if Dems realize how f**ked they are right now as a brand. It was a bunch of people politely discussing how many deck chairs on the Titanic should be reserved for transgender people.” For the sake of the continuing health of America as a free society, all free people must hope that this particular Titanic will continue to sink.



$18 million 'Ukraine2EU' program launched to support Ukraine’s eventual European Union accession

 

The European Union is launching the Ukraine2EU program worth 16.7 million euros ($18 million) to support Ukraine’s preparation for EU membership, officials announced on April 1.

This was stated during the "Ukraine's Accession to the EU: The Choice Has Been Made, It's a Matter of Time” conference.

Lithuanian Foreign Minister Kestutis Budris emphasized that the initiative aims to help Ukraine navigate the complex accession process, especially during wartime, with a goal of EU membership by 2030.

“Ukraine's membership in the EU is crucial for the security and stability of Europe,” Budris said.

The three-year program, implemented by Lithuania’s Central Project Management Agency, will provide strategic support to Ukrainian institutions and civil society involved in European integration efforts.

Sweden and Denmark reaffirmed their commitment to Ukraine’s EU future and urged continued reforms, particularly in the fight against corruption.  



“Moving along the European path still requires significant efforts from Ukraine, but it has already come a long way in extraordinary conditions,” Danish Minister for European Affairs Marie Bjerre stated. “The Ukrainian people can count on the support of their European friends in the process of gaining EU membership.”

EU Ambassador to Ukraine Katarina Maternova added that Ukraine2EU is designed to build institutional capacity and ensure steady progress in Ukraine’s transformative journey toward EU membership.

Ukraine applied for EU membership at the onset of Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022. The country has made quick progress, achieving candidate status within months, with the initial negotiations formally launching in June 2024.

There are six accession negotiation clusters, consisting of several individual chapters. Negotiations prepare a candidate country to become an EU member.

The EU’s Commissioner for Enlargement, Oliver Varhelyi, said that Ukraine could potentially join the bloc by 2029 if it successfully implements necessary reforms.  



https://kyivindependent.com/18-million-ukraine2eu-program-launched-to-support-ukraines-eventual-european-union-accession/


FBI Gagged Agents In 2020 To Prevent Voters From Ever Learning The Truth About Hunter’s Laptop


If the FBI officials who buried the Hunter Biden laptop story aren’t held responsible, it will be impossible for Americans to have any faith in the agency — or the electoral process.



A new report released on Tuesday shows the FBI imposed a “gag” order in relation to the Hunter Biden laptop to conceal the truth about its authenticity from voters ahead of the 2020 election.

Internal FBI chat messages obtained by investigative journalists Catherine Herridge and Michael Shellenberger show that “senior bureau officials actively [shut] down discussion of the laptop’s credibility days before the 2020 presidential election.” According to the report, an FBI official told House investigators that an FBI employee “inadvertently” confirmed the laptop’s authenticity during a conference call on the same day the New York Post published its bombshell story that implicated Joe Biden in his family’s foreign business dealings.

“I recall that when the question came up, an intelligence analyst assigned to the Criminal Investigative Division said something to the effect of, ‘Yes, the laptop is real,’” the official reportedly testified. “I believe it was an (Office of General Counsel) attorney assigned to the (Foreign Influence Task Force) stepped in and said, ‘We will not comment further on this topic.’”

In a series of heavily redacted messages provided to the House for investigation purposes, an unnamed individual tells FBI special agent Elvis M. Chan (who, according to Herridge, was “tasked with interacting with social media companies”) there is a “gag order” on discussions related to Hunter Biden’s laptop. Chan is reportedly told in a separate exchange that the “official response” is “no commen(t).”

In other messages, Chan asks, “what kind of case is the laptop thing? corruption? campaign financing?” An unidentified FBI official responds “CLOSE HOLD” before the rest of the message is redacted.

“oh crap,” Chan responds. “ok. it ends here. need to talk.”

In another exchange reported by Herridge and Shellenberger, Chan is asked, “Anyone discussing that NYPost article on the Biden’s?”

Chan reportedly says: “yes we are. c d confirmed an active investigation. No further comment.”

Herridge reports that “c d” likely references the FBI’s Criminal Division.

Another unidentified FBI employee also said, “please do not discuss Biden matter,” according to the report.

While the Hunter Biden laptop had been authenticated by the FBI as early as November 2019, the agency warned social media companies of so-called “Russian propaganda” and “hack-and-leak operations” by “state actors” after the New York Post released its story. Twitter and Facebook began throttling the reach of the story almost immediately, with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg admitting his platform suppressed the story following the FBI’s warning.

In fact, as explained by The Federalist’s John Daniel Davidson, the “FBI arranged for top Twitter officials to get special security clearances so the agency could share intelligence about possible foreign threats to the upcoming presidential election.”

“This was all a ruse to groom and pressure Twitter into censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story when it inevitably appeared, which is exactly what the company did,” Davidson wrote.

Notably, the laptop has since been used by federal prosecutors as evidence in Hunter Biden’s trial on gun crime charges.

But the FBI’s refusal to immediately publicly verify the laptop and its contents in the weeks leading up to the election was nothing short of election interference. The FBI’s silence on the authenticity of the laptop — and the agency’s own efforts to cast doubts with its warnings to social media companies — meant that 51 former “intelligence officials” who signed onto a letter suggesting the laptop was Russian disinformation were taken at face value. As a result, the propaganda press was able to peddle the lie that the laptop and its contents were merely a foreign disinformation operation and that voters should pay no attention.

In fact, a poll conducted by Newsbusters found that 17 percent of Biden voters would not have voted for him had they known about news stories, such as the Hunter Biden laptop scandal, being suppressed by the propaganda press and Big Tech.

As Davidson said in a post on X, “The FBI and DOJ officials responsible for this need to go to prison. They actively interfered in a presidential election for political reasons, and if there’s not accountability for this then Americans can have no confidence in these agencies, or our elections, ever again.”



Dangerous Fake Peace

Dangerous Fake Peace

What Israel has to insist on.

Unfortunately, the history books are filled with stories addressing failed peace agreements which resulted in major setbacks to the involved nations.

The classic example is the peace agreement between Nazi Germany and the British Prime Minister Chamberlain, who showed his people the document of “Peace in Our Times” which was signed by Hitler and encouraged Hitler to advance his expansionist dreams, which resulted in World War II.

The failure of the Oslo Accords was another important example of a failed attempt to reach a peace agreement. One of the most important reasons for the failure of the accords was the lack of education for peace and reconciliation in the Arab schools and in the media.

This serious problem was enacted by design. When the leader of the PLO Yasser Arafat was asked by his people, why did he agree to proceed with a track towards a peace agreement with the state of Israel in 1993, he responded by referring to the deceptive actions of the Prophet Muhammad as they were related to his presumed peace agreement with the tribe of the Quraysh in Mecca, which was called the Treaty of al-Hudaybiya. Once Muhammad felt strong enough, the treaty was violated, he killed the Jews in the city of Kaybar and he ended up expanding his control on multiple tribes in the region.

As Israel is dealing with the terrorist organizations of Hamas in the Gaza strip and with Hezbollah in Lebanon, it is very clear, that these terrorist organizations have no intention to advance the situation toward a peaceful resolution of the conflict. This is in line with their hope to implement an imposed world domination, by which they will be able to force their religious ideology on everyone across the globe.

The fact that Hamas is a part of the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood, and Hezbollah is a part of the axis of evil, which is led by the Shiite Iran, do not fight each other at this time, is related to the fact that they are fighting a common enemy composed of the state of Israel and the Western society led by the USA.

The fact that the head of this terror snake, Iran, is behind much of the unrest in the Middle East and elsewhere, is a major part of the ongoing problems, which includes the stubbornness of Hamas not to release the Israeli hostages, despite the international pressure on them to do so. Hamas is also hoping to hold on to the hostages as a safety net, to ensure their own survival, and their own hope to rebuild their forces. They stated repeatedly that they would try to challenge Israel again and again, until their successful annihilation of the state of Israel. Just before the very recent military escalation in Gaza, there were intelligence reports that Hamas intended to attack Israel, to get even more hostages.

In addition, there were recent serious terror attacks by the controlling new leaders of the Sunni Syrian forces on the Shiite Alawites and the Christian citizens in Western Syria, where there were reports of more than 20,000 dead victims. At the same time, there is ongoing serious unrest in Turkey against Erdogan and his supporters, because they jailed their opposition leader. Turkey seems to have major nefarious intentions to expand its control and influence, over the neighboring countries, including on the Kurds, on Syria, and on Israel.

At the same time, Egypt is building its military in the Sinai Peninsula and establishing a major local force that goes way beyond the terms of the 1979 peace agreement with Israel. This is a very troubling situation especially because, despite the peace agreement with Israel, Egypt did not change its educational system to teach peace and reconciliation with Israel, despite playing an important role in the new peace negotiations between Hamas and Israel.

This lack of proper education for peace is true also for the kingdom of Jordan.

Therefore, it is imperative that the state of Israel and the responsible leaders of the free world should insist upon the following:

1. Hamas must release immediately all the hostages from Gaza.

2. Hamas must be disarmed and removed from controlling Gaza, as it will lower the chances of Hamas trying to rebuild its forces, kidnap more Israelis, and initiate terror activities in Israel and across the globe.

3. Gaza must be demilitarized as to give a chance to the locals to rebuild their lives in a peaceful environment, where peace is promoted in the schools and in the media.

4. Serious effort must be made to educate the young and the adult population, for peace and reconciliation, across the entire Middle East.

5. International pressure must be placed on Iran to stop its race towards building atomic bombs and to stop its support for terror organizations across the globe.

6. A serious pressure must be placed on Erdogan in Turkey, to stop his race towards dictatorship and regional domination, as it will help advance peace in the region.

7. Egypt and Jordan must be encouraged to start educating their population for peaceful coexistence with Israel and to reduce their military buildup in the Sinai Peninsula, and in the East Bank of the Jordan River, to reduce the chances of military confrontation with Israel.

8. If the people in the region move towards better neighborly relations, Russia and China will hopefully dial down their level of involvement in the region, which will benefit everyone.

9. Once the instigators of the terrorist activity from Iran and from elsewhere, will be under control, even the Houthis will probably decide that it is not in their interest to interrupt the international navigation in the Red Sea and the Suez Canal, especially as they must deal with severe military actions by the USA and other allies.

Hopefully, wisdom will prevail, and we will be able to build a better future for everyone.


Employees Locked Out and Executives Sent to Indian Reservations As the Purge at HHS Hits Its Stride


streiff reporting for RedState 

The first wave of an anticipated 10,000-person reduction in force at the Department of Health and Human Services (Making HHS Healthy Again: RFK Jr. Cuts Thousands of Jobs, Nukes Multiple Divisions – RedState) kicked off this morning as employees found their key cards did not work and that layoff notices landed in their email inboxes at 5 a.m. 

Senior leaders were not immune to the Grim Reaper of the reduction in force. Some were placed on administrative leave. Others, such as Jeanne Marrazzo, who succeeded Anthony Fauci as the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Brian King, director of the Food and Drug Administration's Center for Tobacco Products, were offered transfers to the Indian Health Service, requiring moves to remote areas on Indian reservations and they had to decide by 5 p.m. Tuesday.

“The FDA as we’ve known it is finished, with most of the leaders with institutional knowledge and a deep understanding of product development and safety no longer employed,” Robert Califf, who served as FDA commissioner under Presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama, wrote on LinkedIn on Tuesday morning.

This reduction in force follows the resignation in lieu of dismissal of Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA's chief vaccine regulator; see Top Vaccine Official Given the Choice to Resign or Be Fired As RFK Jr. Reshapes Public Health.

At the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, entire centers were zeroed out. These include: Those divisions include the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; the National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention; the Global Health Center; National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities; and the National Center for Environmental Health. The National Center for Injury Prevention and Control's Division of Violence Prevention was ground zero for the CDC's long-running efforts to treat gun violence as a public health issue.

As if to underscore the point, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., used the occasion of the firings to swear in his two main deputies for reforming HHS; see Senate Confirms Two Key Trump HHS Nominees in Close Votes – RedState.

But as staff members reeled and comforted one another, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. posted a video on social media that showed him swearing in the new heads of the Food and Drug Administration, Dr. Martin A. Makary, and the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.

“Welcome aboard,” Mr. Kennedy said. “The revolution begins today.”

...

The restructuring is intended to bring communications and other functions directly under Mr. Kennedy, who has vowed to “make America healthy again.” It includes collapsing a number of agencies into a new division called the Administration for a Healthy America. Mr. Kennedy said last week that the department was “going to do more with less.”

Without any inside information, this is pure speculation but it looks like the method of carrying out the reduction in force was either needlessly ruthless or HHS had an indication that if staff were given warning they would create a media-friendly incident. Sending the layoff notices at 5 a.m. and disabling key cards is not the way things are usually done.

Removing leaders en masse strips away institutional memory, experience, and expertise, he and others say. “A more reasonable approach would be to ask for resignations for those who have served more than 5 or 10 years rather than an across-the-board, build-from-scratch strategy,” says Robert Cook-Deegan, a policy expert at Arizona State University who has co-authored histories of NIH.

I would counter that these are not reasonable times at HHS. The leadership is deeply compromised both by its role during the COVID panic and by relations with industry and academia. The workforce is politically hostile to President Trump and to Kennedy and most of it went along willingly as public health was used as a deliberate wedge to undermine civil liberties. RFK, Jr., wants to take the agency in a very different direction and he could not reasonably count on the leadership or the workforce for support. So he had to build from scratch and that is what he is doing.



Musk Training DOGE’s Sights on ‘Strangely Wealthy’ Members of Congress: ‘How’d They Get $20 Million?’

Musk Training DOGE’s Sights on ‘Strangely Wealthy’ Members of Congress: ‘How’d They Get $20 Million?’

AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

Elon Musk, head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), indicated he will be turning his crew's attention to members of Congress who have amassed fortunes despite having base salaries under $200,000.

The tech mogul and philanthropist made the comments during a rally in Wisconsin for state Supreme Court candidate Judge Brad Schimel.

"A lot of strangely wealthy members of Congress - where I just can't - I'm trying to connect the dots of how did they become rich," he told those in attendance.

"How'd they get $20 million if they're earning $200,000 a year? Nobody can explain that," added Musk. "We're gonna try to figure it out and certainly stop it from happening."


If you thought members of Congress were losing their minds before over DOGE's efforts to investigate fraud, you ain't seen nothin' yet.

Members of Congress may currently purchase and trade stocks and cryptocurrency, provided they report all transactions. The base salary for Senators and Representatives is $174,000 per year. Some exceptions include the Speaker of the House ($223,500), the President pro tempore of the Senate, and the majority and minority leaders in the House and Senate ($193,400).

Yet some members of Congress have net worths that put them in elite standing—well over $100-$200 million.

A good bulk of the controversy comes from what some critics feel amounts to insider trading. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) went so far as to introduce legislation in 2023 that would ban lawmakers in Congress from making stock purchases or trades.

He called it the "Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments" – or PELOSI – Act.

Pelosi and her husband, Paul Pelosi, have nearly $250 million combined net worth. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has previously, as a Democrat at the time, called out the Pelosis trading acumen as evidence that the system is "rigged."

“We have people in positions of power to pass legislation, to enact new policies,” she has said. “They can see, ‘OK, here are the industries or companies that will benefit from this. I’m going to go and make these investments, buy this stock or that stock, or have my husband or wife do it and then make money in the process.'”

You may be shocked to learn that Pelosi has consistently defended members of Congress's ability to buy and trade stocks despite having insider knowledge of legislation that may affect certain companies or industries.

“We’re a free-market economy,” Pelosi, as Speaker, has said to reporters. “They should be able to participate in that.”

She has, however, insisted that lawmakers should be abiding by the STOCK Act and disclosing their transactions.

Pelosi isn't the only beneficiary of insider knowledge, as evidenced by the success of other congressional members who have had uncanny success at beating the stock market.

In 2021, Business Insider released a damning report titled “Conflicted Congress,” revealing “the myriad ways members of the US House and Senate have eviscerated their own ethical standards” and “avoided consequences" when it comes to questionable financial transactions.

Lawmakers, they said, had “blinded Americans to the many moments” when their “personal finances clash with their public duties.”

Bipartisan efforts to stop the practice of trading stocks for members of Congress have consistently stalled.

Can Musk and his DOGE team finally put a stop to it?