Friday, March 28, 2025

There Are EVs And There Are Teslas. They Are Not The Same.


It’s become vogue on the right to trash electric vehicles. And, mostly, we’re right to. Most of them are garbage retrofits that rely on a garbage network of chargers which are made by garbage ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) manufacturers who have absolutely no idea what they are doing. What they are manufacturing is virtue-signaling, not cars with anything even remotely resembling good EV—or any other type of—engineering.

And then there’s Tesla.

There are EVs, and there are Teslas. And though they are both clearly electric cars, they are two completely different animals. This article aims to give you a permanent mental “ka-chunk” when you think about EVs in general and Teslas in particular because they absolutely, positively should not be grouped together.

I’ve found it most helpful to analogize them this way: think of the entire ecosystem of PC computers and then think of Apple computers. Yes, they are the same in that they are both computers made up of software + hardware, but we all know they are very different animals for a variety of reasons. The most salient difference between them, for the purposes of our discussion, is that Apple manufactures its software hardware under the same roof, from the ground up, to work together and work in harmony. This is why Apple users are so cult-like: their products, made as they are, are extremely stable. In short, they just work.

It's different with PCs, which have operating systems, software, and hardware all from different places. The hardware is manufactured by dozens of different companies (HP, Samsung, Toshiba, Sony, etc.), on which the Microsoft Windows operating system is loaded, on which a thousand different pieces of Windows-compatible software from a thousand different manufacturers are loaded. Of course, your PC breaks down every five minutes. How could it not?

Well, Tesla manufactures its cars like Apple manufactures its computers; holistically, from the ground up, software + hardware, with the single purpose of making one “organism,” in this case a car, a Tesla car, in which both the software + hardware work in harmony. They do this, importantly, in factories built to do nothing but build these rolling synergies of software + hardware. No other car company, EV or ICE, can claim the same thing.

And that’s why Tesla owners are as cult-like as Apple computer owners.

They just work.

So, what’s it like? Getting in a Tesla for the first time? Well, let me just pause you a moment for this thought. You know how it is—you buy something, not even necessarily a car, just anything, and you go to use it, and you think, “Did any actual humans test this before it went to market, or nah?” How many times, right?

Not so with a Tesla. Everyone knows how to use a touchscreen, right? Well, then, you can drive a Tesla. The way I most often describe driving my car when people ask me about it is that it is like driving a big, very zippy iPad. It’s (alarmingly!) fast and extremely intuitive. In fact, you’ve likely never experienced anything quite like it, and your going away impression will likely be, “How come every car isn’t designed like this? It’s so powerful, so human friendly.”

There are no physical keys. Your phone, which you have with you all the time anyway, is your car “key.” And you simply assign drivers, like your spouse, to have access to it via the Tesla app they load on their phone. Easy-peasy. This works great for shopping situations we’ve all been in.

How many times have you said to your spouse, while he or she is shopping, “You take your time. I’ll go wait in the car,” then you walk all the way to the car and realize you forgot to ask for the keys? This is no longer a problem with Tesla because you each always have your own key on your phone. (And if you’ve forgotten where you parked, the app will show you the location of your car.)

Tesla is also pet-friendly! Did you know it has a dog mode? You can leave your dog in heated or air-conditioned comfort, and the big display screen in the front lets passers-by know your pup is safe and comfortable. You can even check on your dog remotely via the interior camera view on your cell phone app and talk to your dog via the car’s interior speakers. (Note: You can’t see it in the still picture but the balloon dog on the screen moves and wags his tail. It’s very cute.)

Now for the meat and potatoes: There are no oil changes or engine parts that need regular maintenance, repair, or replacing. Trips to the auto mechanic, along with their unwelcome, often prohibitive bills, have been—now over two years into our ownership—zero. And that doesn’t even count all the money we’ve saved on gas! And speaking of gas, consider that every time you leave your garage, you have a “full tank” of “gas.” That’s the beauty of having a car that runs on battery power. Your “gas” station is your garage.

Now, EVs, Tesla or not, are not meant for everyone, and it’s ok to admit that. The one thing EVs and Teslas share is that they really, really hate the cold. Range goes down dramatically when it’s dramatically cold. You also may not be able to garage or charge your Tesla at your residence. If you can’t plug in at home, any battery-operated car is a bad choice. You simply must be able to charge at home; there’s no way around it.

If the cold and home-charging aren’t barriers for you, the simple act of buying one is insanely easy. You do it all through the Tesla app, and the cars cost what they cost. There’s no tedious back and forth with a car salesman or hours doing paperwork at the dealership.

Absolutely everything is done via the app, whether it’s uploading your ID, insurance, applying for financing, or anything else. The app walks you right through what you need to do, and it even keeps you up to date on the manufacturing of your car! Tesla then texts you when it’s ready, and you go to the dealership and pick it up.

When we picked up our Tesla, it took maybe ten minutes, and we were off. When have you ever driven off the lot with a car in ten minutes, ever? They have someone there to make sure you’re comfortable with all the features before you drive away, and it’s just that quick and effortless. You kinda can’t believe it when you do it, but it really is that easy!

Just like you kinda can’t believe how easy it is—and how satisfying and fun it is—to drive it. Or how safe it is. Or how well and powerfully everything works. Go ahead and count me in as a member of both cults: Apple and Tesla. I make no apologies!



X22, And we Know, and more- March 28

 



0:00 / 0:00

15 seconds

15 seconds

DEI Is Dying


President Donald Trump ended federal DEI programs.

Even before, companies were having second thoughts.

Victoria's Secret changed "Diversity, Equity and Inclusion" to "inclusion and belonging."

Now, even woke Disney, despite squandering 270 million shareholder dollars on a moronic new version of "Snow White," joined the mob of companies dropping DEI programs.

Why? Diversity, equity and inclusion sound good.

The problem is that DEI programs were captured by activists who obsess about victimhood. They divide people more than they empower.

"Diversity, equity and inclusion," says activist Robby Starbuck in my newest video, "don't mean what they pretend to mean."

Before Trump ended federal DEI programs by executive order, Starbuck ended them at some companies merely by using the power of speech. His strategy: warn companies that he'll tell his social media followers what stupid things they do.

Remarkably, that worked!

After he criticized John Deere on Twitter for encouraging "preferred pronouns" and holding woke diversity trainings, John Deere quickly dropped those policies.

Toyota, Target and Harley Davidson did, too.

"Why did they listen to you?" I ask.

"We go to them like any other investigative journalist and we say, 'Hey, we have a story we're working on.'"

Then, if they don't change their policies, he goes public -- posting the policies and his criticism on YouTube, Twitter, etc.

One week after he posted that Toyota sponsored pride parades and divided workers into identity-based groups such as LGBT, Black and Christian, Toyota stopped sponsoring LGBTQ events and opened employee groups to all workers.

Coors has been requiring DEI trainings and donating to pride events. All it took was Starbuck looking into the company, and they stopped.

So did Jack Daniels, McDonald's, Walmart, AT&T, Lowe's and Ford.

"I like diversity," I tell him, suggesting DEI programs were good.

"They sound warm and fuzzy," says Starbuck. "It's why at the beginning, it got a lot of buy-in ... I want to include everybody. I don't want to be mean. What it actually turned out to be in reality looked more like crazy trainings, overtly racist hiring practices, diametrically opposed to the very warm, fuzzy sounding words they try to sell."

I think private companies should be able to have whatever policies they want. Customers and workers can buy other products or work someplace else.

But over the past few years, DEI mandates became so prevalent, you couldn't avoid them.

I'm a Chase Bank customer. The bank is run by a very smart guy, Jamie Dimon.

Just last year, Dimon said DEI is "good for business; it's morally right; we're quite good at it."

But after Starbuck revealed JPMorgan's policies, Dimon quickly changed his mind.

"I saw how we were spending money on some of this stupid s--t," Dimon said, "and it really pissed me off ... I'm just going to cancel them. I don't like wasted money in bureaucracy."

In my years of reporting, I've never seen changes this fast.

DEI activists are angry about it.

The president of the National Coalition on Black Civic Participation says, "We will not be erased!"

"What existed before DEI?" replies Starbuck. "Did black people not exist before that?"

On "The View," host Sunny Hostin claims, "This will specifically harm women ... African Americans and Latinos."

"What she's actually saying is that minorities are not going to be able to get jobs if the sole thing you're looking at is merit. The way I was raised, you call that racism," replies Starbuck. "She's being racist."

I push back:

"They're just saying, 'We have a history of disadvantage. We were slaves in this country.'"

"None of them were," he points out. "I'm Cuban. I could say my family went through this and that. I didn't go through it. I'm not going to claim their disadvantage as my own."

"We're not going to fall for the same stupid stuff anymore. We're going to judge people based on merit."



Victor Davis Hanson: The REAL Oligarchs Who've Been Running Our Country💵

Have you noticed how terms like oligarchs, autocrats, plutocrats, and aristocrats are being thrown around in political discourse? But why now? And why is it suddenly a concern when figures like Elon Musk start questioning the Democratic Party? Victor Davis Hanson breaks down the irony of the Left’s sudden outrage over wealthy elites influencing politics on today’s episode of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words” “  The Democrats raised $1 billion more than did Trump. So, what is going on? There is an anger now that for the first time in 20 years, over three administrations—Clinton, Obama, and Biden—for the first time there are multibillionaires who are starting to question their Democratic loyalty: larry Ellison, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, perhaps even Jeff Bezos. “ The Democratic Party is the party of the very wealthy, plutocracy, and the billionaire class, but they demand absolute loyalty and solidarity. And any defections or apostates then cause them to go—I don’t know what the word is—ballistic that anybody would doubt their ability to control the big money in the United States.”



Trump Admin Needs to Reverse Biden Wokeness and Weaponization


The weaponization of government was probably the hallmark of the administration of Joe Biden. OK, the weaponization of government and senile, incoherent ramblings were the hallmarks. While the senile ramblings are gone, the infrastructure of that weaponization remains fully entrenched in agencies across the federal government. President Donald Trump needs to remove any and everyone involved in the effort to not only use the power of government against him for political purposes, but against any American.

Weaponization of government is more than just filing bogus charges or creating new laws under which prosecutions can happen, it involves government creating flaming hoops through which Americans have to jump to open or expand a business, or simply do business with the government itself.

President Biden famously attached Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) strings to nearly every government contract – hire this type of person, give to this cause or force your employees to participate in this or that “education” program and you will be deemed worthy of doing business with the very government you fund.

The Biden administration spent an astonishing $128 million on DEI promotion grants while allocating $42 billion to connect poor and rural Americans to high-speed internet access, but connected no one because no company could meet the standards for DEI they set. They took all the credit for “connecting Americans,” and none of the blame for making that connection impossible through their weaponization efforts.

The Federal Communications Commission now has good, new leadership, but it also has staff that helped implement “net neutrality” twice – the attempt to insert the federal government in the internet, which would naturally lead to taxes and more regulation. Most of all, it would have led to a much slower, worse internet.

The FCC under Barack Obama tried it, then it was undone under Donald Trump the first time. Then Obama II – Joe Biden – attempted to reinstate them, only to be struck down by the courts just before the start of the second Trump administration.

Anyone pivotal in both attempts, or even in just one of the attempts, should be reassigned, at the very minimum. The best way to mitigate disaster is to get rid of those responsible for it, as history has a habit of repeating itself.

At the Federal Trade Commission, President Trump has already started to delouse the place by firing the two Democrats on it. Why? Because the government needs a house-cleaning and good kick in the complacency.

The FTC was very activist-left under its old leadership, the Biden-appointed Lina Khan. The Washington Times described her tenure as having “poisoned the workplace environment and sabotaged its mission because of her reckless disregard for precedent.”

In what appears to be a nod to the abortion industry, the FTC sued an Idaho-based company called Kochava claiming they were “selling sensitive geolocation data that was being misused for political purposes.”

The Times reported, “According to the agency, which hasn’t helped matters by its failure to define what it means by ‘sensitive locations,’ the company has the potential to sell geolocation data to political operators around the country who use the data to market products and candidates and address political issues to people who have been shown to have visited Planned Parenthood facilities.”

“Even if these claims are factual, none of that is illegal,” reports the Times. “Still, Ms. Khan, as she has done many times before, does not shy away from a chance to expand the federal government’s ability to reach into the marketplace and control it. What makes this case a bit strange is that it’s been the Democrats who have made the best use of this kind of information.”

It’s good that she’s gone, it will be better when the remnants of her tenure and those “below the fold” who participated in her actions are wiped clean too. The best thing that the Trump administration can do now is to instruct his FTC to drop these types of weaponized litigation efforts to free companies from the Biden administration’s attacks.

Step out of line or fail to be sufficiently deferential to whatever the left-wing political whims are at any given moment and your career will be over. It’s weird to see the people taking to the streets claiming to care so deeply about bureaucrats fired by DOGE have no problem with the military men and women discharged for refusing to get a COVID shot, for example. COVID was another political flashpoint for the Biden administration and if you stepped out of line, be prepared to pay hefty legal fees.

In November 2022, the FTC falsely accused Precision Patient Outcomes, Inc. (PPO), a small, California-based company, of unlawfully marketing and selling a dietary supplement called “Covid Resist,” one which the company never sold. The agency’s lawsuit against PPO and CEO Margrett Lewis was terminated on February 15, 2024. In November 2021, a nasal spray maker Xlear was sued by Biden’s DoJ for “falsely” marketing its saline sprays as an effective way to prevent and treat COVID-19. This lawsuit contradicted the research that the Biden administration itself had produced. In 2020, the National Institutes of Health promoted a clinical trial that proved Xlear sprays helped with overcoming and preventing COVID infections.  

Progressive activism metastasizes throughout any organization everywhere it is found. It has to be torn out, root and branch, in every little way. Yes, there are bigger and broader examples of this internal rot out there, but the Trump administration is pulling those out. These are a few examples of what needs to come next, and then after that there will be more; there will always be more.

There is no finish line in the fight against the left weaponizing our government against citizens, only a constant struggle to keep it at bay. It’s thankless work, but as long as we have a massive government trying to impose its will on Americans rather than leaving us alone, it’s some of the most important.



Trump says he had productive call with Canadian PM Carney

U.S. President Donald Trump said he had a productive call on Friday with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney amid increased tensions between the neighboring allies.



CNBC Host Obliterates Dem Senator's Position on Signal Story With One Simple Question

 Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) thought he could deliver his DNC-approved talking points on Signal on CNBC but got easily demolished by co-host Joe Kernan of Squawk Box.


 It was an obliteration, a total exposure of the lies perpetuated by the Democrats. It’s a DC-obsessed story: top Trump officials discussed anti-Houthi operations on Signal, an encrypted, government-approved messenger app, which accidentally added The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg to the chat. He alleges secret war plans were discussed. That’s false. No classified information was divulged, though hordes of unqualified media reporters and other liberal journalists have said otherwise since admitting that fact would wreck the narrative. 

Kernan wondered by Coons and other Democrats are calling for Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and others on the chat to resign when no one called on Lloyd Austin to step down at the Pentagon over the Afghanistan withdrawal and going AWOL for two weeks due to a medical issue related to his prostate cancer diagnosis. We later found out that no one at the Biden White House knew where he was during that period. 

Thirteen Americans died during that ignominious exit from the country, along with $70-80 billion in military equipment falling into the hands of the Taliban. Regarding the exaggerated Signal story, no Americans were killed. The only deaths were the Houthi terrorists we turned into ashtrays. Coons later tried to blame the shambolic Afghan withdrawal on Trump, which is where you can tune out. Kernan had him. Coons knew it, and Austin should have been forced to resign.

Onto the next battle.


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/03/28/cnbc-host-obliterates-dem-senators-position-on-signal-story-with-one-simple-queston-n2654647

🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Inaccurate list of Canadian tariffs circulates amid US trade war

 Canada introduced reciprocal tariffs after US President Donald Trump imposed a 25 percent duty on Canadian products, but social media posts claim exorbitant Canadian fees were already applied to American goods. 



This is misleading; the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) allowed most goods to cross the border duty-free, with steep levies on dairy, chicken and egg imports kicking in only if quotas designed to manage supply are exceeded.

"You guys don't realize already the tariffs that Canada places on the United States," the speaker in a video posted to X on March 4, 2025 says. "Take a look at those numbers and see if that's fair."

The user goes on to display a list of fees Canada supposedly imposes on American products, including tariffs exceeding 200 percent for dairy, poultry, sugar and peanut butter and levies above 100 percent for tobacco, rice, vegetables and fish.

Variations of the list -- sometimes referencing products such as cars, televisions and aluminum --  have circulated since at least late January 2025 on FacebookInstagramX and TikTok, after Trump first threatened a 25 percent tariff on Canadian goods entering the United States.

Image
Screenshot of an Instagram post taken March 5, 2025
Image
Screenshot of an X post taken March 5, 2025

The American duties on Canadian products went into effect on March 4 with Trump saying the tariffs are necessary to force action on migrants and drugs entering the United States through its northern border, despite data showing...  the volume is nominal.

Trump has also claimed Canada and the US have an unequal trade relationship that needs to be rectified (archived here).

Canada announced (archived here) an initial round of retaliatory tariffs on March 4 and many of the products discussed in the social media posts -- with the exception of cars and aluminum -- were included in the country's list of items which would now be subject to a 25 percent fee if they were coming from the United States.

But the social media posts are looking at the prior rates and Ottawa-based international trade expert Peter Clark (archived here) said these were shared for 2025 by the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) which classifies many products as tariff-free if they are coming from the United States (archived here).

"You look up any manufactured goods from the United States, the rate of duty is free," he said.

Clark explained that while there are exceptions for some agricultural products, duty-free trade for most products between the United States and Canada had been the status quo since the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement in 1989 (archived here). This was superseded when Mexico joined the economic fold in 1994 with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and was updated again with USMCA negotiated during Trump's first presidency (archived here and here).

For each item on its list, CBSA includes a percentage for the tariff applied as well as any exemptions. Clark said any product marked with "UST" or "MXT" referred to tariff exemptions that were a part of USMCA.

AFP examined the document to ascertain whether tariffs were applied to items referenced in the social media posts:

  • Barley seed, UST: Free
  • Raw sugar, UST: Free
  • Peanut butter, UST: Free
  • Footwear, UST: Free
  • Bovine meat, UST: Free
  • Rice, UST: Free
  • Cars, UST: Free
  • Vacuum cleaners, UST: Free
  • Aluminum, UST: Free
  • Tobacco, UST: Free

AFP also compared these rates to those recorded in the US International Trade Administration tariff database

 (archived here) and received the same results showing no import fees on all the products.

The numbers used in the recent social media posts appear to recycle similar false claims about Canadian tariffs which predate the current trade dispute.

Supply management

The highest supposed tariffs discussed in the posts were dairy and poultry products, which some users claimed were charged at over 200 percent. Clark explained that Canada has supply management regulations for these types of products, meaning that after an import quota has been reached for a specific exporter, they are charged a much steeper fee (archived here). These measures are allowed under USMCA.

Bruce Muirhead, a history professor at the University of Waterloo (archived here), said Canada instigates supply management quotas on particular items intending to prevent agricultural surpluses within the country's market.

"As its name suggests, they manage supply," he said.

For example, CBSA's list shows milk has an initial tariff of 7.5 percent (with exemptions again for USMCA signatories) but above a certain quantity that could rise to 241 percent for any exporter. This is still less than the 270 percent claimed in the post.

Trump has referenced the 270 percent tariff on milk for years without context, including in claims he made during his first term at the 2018 G7 summit. 

Muirhead said other products mentioned in the social media posts, such as butter, cheese, eggs and poultry, are also regulated by supply management policies. As with milk, the CBSA list shows these items are subject to higher tariffs over initial quotas.

Official US data estimated the overall trade deficit with Canada at $63.3 billion at the end of 2024 (archived here and here), while Statistics Canada reported its surplus with the United States as Can$102.3 billion ($70.3 billion).

But the biggest factor in the imbalance was oil and gas exports from Canada, according to analysts (archived here and here).

Dairy exports from the United States to Canada amounted to $1.14 billion in 2024, according to the US Department of Agriculture, nearly doubling over a decade (archived here).

https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.36ZB6AD

'Sensitive' army papers found scattered in street

 

Piles of papers containing sensitive military information have been found scattered along a city street.

They include soldiers' ranks, emails, shift patterns and weapon issue details, and information which appears to relate to accessing weapons storage and an intruder detection system. 


The documents were discovered spilling out of a black bin bag in the Scotswood area of Newcastle by a football fan on 16 March and, according to information security consultant Gary Hibberd, posed a "significant" threat to individuals named in them.

The Ministry of Defence (MoD) said it was looking into the matter "urgently" and was conducting an internal investigation.

Downing Street said it could not comment on "any specifics" while the Army's investigation was taking place.  


"But you can expect that appropriate action will be taken in response to any potential information breach," a spokesperson said.

The papers appear to be connected to British Army regiments and barracks at Catterick Garrison.

One document was headed "armoury keys and hold IDS codes", which the BBC understands relates to accessing an armoury - a storage area for weapons and ammunition - and an intruder detection system.

Another was footnoted with the words "official – sensitive" which, according to government guidance, can in some cases mean the information could lead to a "threat to life" if compromised.

Information contained in the dumped documents ranged from general medical advice to ingredients order sheets, along with people's ID numbers and email addresses.  


The papers were discovered by Mike Gibbard, from Gateshead, as he parked his car before heading to a fanzone to watch Newcastle United's Wembley win over Liverpool in the Carabao Cup Final.

"I peered down and started to see names on bits of papers, and numbers, and I thought 'what's that?'," he said.

The papers were piled up against a wall in a black bag and "in the road, underneath cars, spread all the way up the road".

"I found a lot more on the other side of the road that wasn't in a bag."

Mr Gibbard said he asked his wife: "Why is it here? This shouldn't be here, anyone could pick it up."

Describing the find as "crazy", he said he saw "details of the perimeter, the patrol, checking weapons in and out, requests for leave, mobile phone numbers, high ranking officers". 


Gary Hibberd, an information security consultant with 35 years' experience, said the documents posed a "significant" threat to those individuals named.

"They could be easily identified through social media, they could potentially be coerced, they could be harassed," he said.

Government guidance on sensitive information reveals such documents could, in the wrong hands, lead to "moderate, short term damage" to UK or allied forces' military operations.

It adds: "However, in some exceptional circumstances, the compromise of more sensitive official information could lead to a threat to life."

All such documents should be disposed of in a "burn bag" or by shredding in an approved machine  


Mr Gibbard reported the find to Northumbria Police.

A spokesperson confirmed the force "received a report that potentially confidential documents had been found on Railway Street in the Scotswood area of Newcastle".

"The documents have now been handed to the Ministry of Defence."

An MoD spokesperson said: "We are looking into this urgently and the matter is the subject of an ongoing internal investigation."  



https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyjed2038ko






British Prime Minister Announces Prosecution Of King Arthur For Pulling Dangerous Sword From Stone

British Prime Minister Announces Prosecution Of King Arthur For Pulling Dangerous Sword From Stone


LONDON — British PM Keir Starmer has announced that he has directed authorities to prosecute the famous King Arthur for his unauthorized use of the deadly sword Excalibur, violating the nation's ban on swords. 

Sources say authorities were initially alerted after learning that the famed sword had been pulled from a stone by the suspect. 

"These deadly weapons have no place in British society," said Starmer in an announcement. "Our nation is suffering from an epidemic of brutal stabbings from no particular people group or religion in particular. Anyone who brandishes these instruments of death will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law."

"Allahu Akbar," he concluded.

Starmer confirmed that anyone caught with sharp instruments such as swords, knives, and those little cocktail olive skewers will be shown no mercy until the "scourge of sharp, pointy instruments" is defeated.

"It doesn't matter that this 'Arthur' character is a king," said one law enforcement officer. "No one is above the law. He clearly belongs in jail."

At publishing time, Starmer had clarified that Arabic scimitars used in ritual honor killings would be exempt from England's sword ban.