The Kids Are All Right-Wing

posted by Kurt Schlichter at Townhall 

It’s a thing of beauty to see that our young men are turning so hard toward the hard-core right-wing. In fact, they are much more right-wing as 20-year-olds than the current crop of 75-year-olds is as doddering ancients. But that’s understandable because the 75-year-olds were the hippie boomers who generally screwed up everything. The 20-year-olds were the victims of the boomers. We should celebrate the awakening of young males against the woke and the groovy idiocy of their forbearers. With the election of Donald Trump, these guys discovered their power when they flexed their muscles. Retribution is coming for the boomers and others who kept them down. And I say this is a guy born in the last week of the Baby Boom.

Why are young men so right-wing? Because they’ve been treated like crap. Imagine yourself as a normal young man. When, throughout your whole life, have you ever been told you were anything besides dirt? When have you ever been in an institution that masculine males ran? It’s almost certain that you never have been. Your whole life has been organized, supervised, and surveilled by scolding feminist harridans and their insipid femboy sidekicks who hold you in contempt. 

You went to preschool, kindergarten, elementary, and high school, and who ran it? Primarily leftist women and women–adjacent men. You were told to sit and be still four hours a day when every instinct in your body told you to run and jump. When you were active, they drugged you. They hovered over you, micromanaging your childhood. You were told how you could play. No toy guns, no toy weapons. Oh gosh, no toxic masculinity. Here, have a doll, explore your feminine side. No wonder a portion of boys just gave in and became the (fake) girls they had been told society really wanted them to be.

Men build and men destroy. But you can’t do either in these institutions. What do you build in school? Shop classes are gone. You’re not going to be able to learn to fix a car in auto class. No, you sit there all day and read books about how you’re terrible because your grandfather came from Glasgow. It’s all your fault, you know. All the world‘s problems are on you because of who you are. And if you complain, they tell you to stop trying to center the narrative on yourself by expecting to be treated equally.

And you can’t destroy either, even though destruction is a critical part of what it means to be a man. A man must be ready to fight. If you can’t, you’re not really a man. But look at schools today. If some bully starts pushing you around, and you turn around and drop him with a right cross to the jaw – which is absolutely the appropriate response to bullies – you’re going to be prosecuted just as hard as the actual bully. Maybe more – defending yourself indicates independent thought and that’s got to be stamped out. Instead of being celebrated as a hero – and every man worth his salt wants to be a hero – you will be vilified for doing what your nature tells you to do, that is, protecting yourself and others from violent threats. 

No, these institutions expect you to outsource your manhood to alleged professionals with badges, but the idea of the police was never to substitute for your rightto and obligation of self-defense in defense of others. Yet the feminine institutions that oppress you as a young man seek to do that. If you can defend yourself, you have power. If you shoot guns, you have power. If you’re strong, you have power. And the whole purpose of the establishment is to ensure young men have no power.

They deny every urge you have to strive for glory. They beat you down. Look at their reading lists. It’s all about girl bosses and feelings. Are there out books there about heroes? Are there books about achievement in the face of adversity? Where are the stories of warriors? That’s what history is, not some narrative of serving wenches and commie nonsense about 1619. Your true history, your heritage, is a king raising his sword, pointing it to the line of invading barbarians, and screaming “Charge!” as he leads thousands of Christian knights to victory.

What are young men left with? Can they find suitable mates? No. A whole different set of lies has deluded the poor women who they would once romance and marry. They’ve been told they’re supposed to be girlbosses from watching TV shows where a 110-pound waif body slams a 300-pound thug. They’ve been told they can do it all, and then they reach 40 and realize the alarm on their biological clocks went off long ago. They’ve been lied to as well.

One of those lies is that the attention of young men is akin to harassment. Not all young women believe that. Like young men, some resist the lies of the establishment, but the fact is young single women are much more leftist than any other group. They have no love in their lives, so they embrace the fake empathy of leftism. They also make it nearly impossible for young men to meet and get to know them. Recently, a young woman on X complained that no men on the subway would give up their seats for her. But you have to ask why a young man would do that. He’s been told not that women are equal but that women are the same. The concept of chivalry has been rendered toxic. You can’t very well expect to reap the benefits of a cultural arrangement like chivalry without meeting its obligations. The fact is that chivalry recognizes that men are physically stronger and must protect and defend women, but if you reject that concept, you can’t have chivalry. You better enjoy standing on the subway, opening your own doors, and buying your own dinner. And you better enjoy protecting and supporting yourself too.

You can’t have a system of rights and duties where you hog the rights and forgo the duties. But for young men, it’s all duties. They have a duty to accept abuse. They have a duty to be silent. They have a duty to give up their opportunities in favor of people from preferred demographics. Did you know that no young white male born after 1984 has been published as a fiction writer in the New Yorker? Now, that’s not to say there are no opportunities for writers of pallor – my manly bestsellers are potent proof of that – but when you completely excludea group of people from the benefits of society, it seems bizarre that you somehow expect them to sacrifice for that same society.

Many of them withdraw to a world of pot, video games, and solitary onanism. What does it say that so many young men prefer the cold erotic companionship of computer monitor pixels to taking the risk of rejection and accusation by flesh and blood women?

Men sense the injustice, and they are correct. They’ve been betrayed and wronged. But now they’re going to make it right. They’ve realized that they have power. They realized that they don’t have to take it. The establishment didn’t realize what was happening, and now it’s too late. America’s right-wing male youth is going to exact its vengeance, and it’s going to be glorious.

X22, And we Know, and more- March 27

 

House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan lays out sweeping agenda for judicial reform

 

By Steven Richards   |   26 March 2025   |   Just the News.

https://justthenews.com/government/congress/house-judiciary-chair-jim-jordan-lays-out-sweeping-agenda-judicial-reform

Republicans in Congress have zeroed in on federal judges unilaterally blocking key Trump executive orders on immigration and government reform. The Constitution gives Congress the right to delineate the authority of district courts.

As President Donald Trump faces stiff challenges from federal judges across the country, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, is laying out a sweeping agenda for judicial reform to rein in judges that he says are being overtly political.

In just under 65 days of President Trump’s second term, federal judges have issued at least 15 nationwide injunctions, where single judges on the district court level have attempted to block certain administration policies nationwide. Republicans have roundly decried the injunctions because of their sweeping nature and have accused some of the judges of being motivated by politics instead of sound legal arguments.

“[When] you have a judge whose behavior is so politically, so political against President Trump, you kind of got to start asking the question, really, is this just a bad judicial decision, or is this based on politics?” Jordan told the “Just the News, No Noise” TV show on Tuesday.

Three reforms being proposed

Jordan, who leads the House committee responsible for overseeing the federal law enforcement and court system, told Just the News that he is planning to address reforms to the judicial system in three ways: passing legislation to limit nationwide injunctions by individual federal judges; wielding Congress’s appropriations power to curtail judicial activism; and conducting hearings on judicial conduct.

“[There’s] three avenues that Congress has to deal with this situation. One is legislative, and we're already working on that. We've passed the bill out of committee two and a half weeks ago that the Speaker has indicated they're gonna put on the floor next week. But that bill says, when you have one of these federal district judges who issues an injunction, you know, some some judge in Timbuktu California issues an injunction, it should only apply to parties in the case and in that respective jurisdiction, it shouldn't have nationwide application. So we think that makes sense,” Jordan said.

The Judiciary Committee last week approved the “No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025” sponsored by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif. That legislation would curtail federal judges from making nationwide injunctions in the cases before them, “except in the case of such an order that is applicable only to limit the actions of a party to the case before such district court with respect to the party seeking injunctive relief from such district court and non-parties represented by such a party acting in a representative capacity.”

The bill would provide a new pathway for injunctive relief in cases where three or more states challenge a federal law. In such a case, the challenge would be referred to a three-judge panel selected randomly which would be given the authority to issue the types of nationwide injunctions currently being used by individual federal judges.

The administration has so far faced dozens of lawsuits, mostly over Trump’s executive orders and the actions of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, resulting in injunctions—known as Temporary Restraining Orders—that freeze administration policies as the case is adjudicated. Most of the injunctions have come from the Democratic-friendly Maryland or DC courts, though their rulings currently apply nationwide, frustrating efforts by Trump to enact his agenda. [more]

Please see the rest of the story at:

https://justthenews.com/government/congress/house-judiciary-chair-jim-jordan-lays-out-sweeping-agenda-judicial-reform

Beijing Puts Its Thumb on Panama Canal Deal

 Beijing intervenes in the sale of the rights to operate the two parts of the Panama Canal, but there’s not much it can do, an expert says.

Beijing is meddling in a pending sale of port rights from a Hongkonger-owned company to a U.S. business consortium led by BlackRock, according to a China expert.

The deal announced on March 4 involves 43 ports in 23 countries. However, two ports—Balboa and Cristobal—in the bundle are receiving disproportionate attention because they are at the Panama Canal.

The seller, CK Hutchinson, is owned by Li Ka-shing, an iconic billionaire in Hong Kong. For decades, Hongkongers admired his success and nicknamed him “Superman.” As an immigrant from mainland China, Li built his empire by selling plastic flowers and then transitioned to real estate, telecommunications, and shipping.

Now, because of the deal, the 96-year-old tycoon is labeled as a traitor for “selling out the country and the entire Chinese population” and “spinelessly kneeling” before the United States.

Between March 13 and March 19, the pro-Beijing Hong Kong newspaper Ta Kung Pao published more than 10 editorials and commentaries, handing him the above reprimand. The articles further advised all businessmen to stand with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) on critical issues. An article on March 13 said the deal could impact China’s foreign trade and the Belt and Road Initiative, China’s $1 trillion geopolitical infrastructure investment worldwide.

The Hong Kong and Macao Work Office, the CCP’s representative in Hong Kong, reprinted three of Ta Kung Pao’s articles on its official website.

When asked about the criticism at a press briefing on March 18, Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee repeated the Chinese foreign ministry’s line that his government wanted foreign governments to “provide a fair and just environment” for Hong Kong enterprises and that he was “against any use of coercion or pressure in international trade.” He added that any transactions must follow Chinese laws and regulations.

Alexander Liao, a China expert and contributor to The Epoch Times, said his CCP insider sources in Beijing told him that Chinese leader Xi Jinping is angry at the deal that President Donald Trump touted in his address to a joint session of Congress on March 4.

As a result, Liao said, Ding Xuexiang, a CCP Politburo Standing Committee member and vice premier of China, dispatched a special working team to Hong Kong on March 15 to scrutinize the Panama Canal deal.

Liao grew up in China’s military system and was previously stationed in Hong Kong as a seasoned journalist for more than a decade. He has learned that officials in the Hong Kong government aren’t very comfortable with exerting pressure on a business deal, which Hong Kong historically did not do. Therefore, the Beijing team has been leading the charge, he said.

He told The Epoch Times that Ta Kung Pao’s smear campaign against Li and the actions of the CCP’s Hong Kong office were conducted at the direction of the Beijing delegation.

However, the CCP has limited leverage on Li, he said.

Although CK Hutchinson, Li’s flagship enterprise, is listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, it is incorporated in the Cayman Islands. Over the past decade, the share of its business in the mainland and Hong Kong has shrunk to slightly more than 10 percent. Li will pocket about $19 billion from the deal, which prices the transaction at about 14 times the 2024 earnings, higher than the average range for industrial enterprises of eight or 11 times earnings.

Liao said that one tool the local government could use is the Hong Kong national security law. Because of its vague definition of national security and the stipulation that the law applies to individuals both inside and outside Hong Kong, thousands of pro-democracy activists protested against it in 2020. Nevertheless, Beijing imposed the law on the former British colony in the same year.

Beijing could use this law to retaliate against Li. However, according to Liao, the consequence could involve an irreversible hit on the Chinese economy because such a precedent would have a chilling effect on Hong Kong businessmen and foreign investors.

The Ta Kung Pao commentaries have accused Li of “neglecting national interest.”

Political commentator Heng He said on his Chinese-language program that Ta Kung Pao spoke for Beijing and viewed the deal politically rather than as a business transaction of a private company. To Heng, if the CCP is worried that Washington could use the Panama Canal against Beijing after a U.S. company buys the rights to operate the ports, then that proves indirectly that the CCP itself wants to hold the option to utilize the ports in a manner hostile to the United States under a Chinese company’s management and control.

Illustration by The Epoch Times, Google Earth, Shutterstock

Core US Interest

The Panama Canal is a strategic chokepoint that plays a crucial role in U.S. military and economic activities, serving as a vital passage for warships and cargo between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.

Each year, the Panama Canal handles $270 billion in cargo, representing 5 percent of global maritime trade, with more than 70 percent of that trade connected to U.S. ports. The canal was under U.S. control until 1999, when its sovereignty was transferred to Panama under a 1977 treaty signed by President Jimmy Carter.

The Carter–Torrijos Treaty of 1977 requires the “permanent neutrality” of the canal, ensuring that no countries are discriminated against and that no ships act with hostility. According to the agreement, if that neutrality is at risk, the United States may use military force to defend it.

After taking office in January, Trump questioned the neutrality. He alleged that the canal was being operated by the Chinese regime and vowed to intervene, prompting denials from Beijing and Panama.

“China is operating the Panama Canal,” Trump said during his inaugural speech. “And we didn’t give it to China. We gave it to Panama, and we’re taking it back.”

In 1997, CK Hutchinson obtained the rights to manage the two ports at both ends of the Panama Canal for 25 years. In 2021, the agreement was renewed to 2047.

When announcing the most recent deal, the company said it was a pure business transaction, irrelevant to the recent political news surrounding the waterway.

The Panama Canal is a peripheral strategic interest for the CCP, yet it is a “core U.S. interest,” Liao said.

Days before visiting Panama as his first trip outside the United States, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in an interview on Jan. 31: “Hong Kong-based companies having control over the entry and exit points of the canal is completely unacceptable. That cannot continue.”

“If there’s a conflict and China tells them, do everything you can to obstruct the canal so that the U.S. can’t engage in trade and commerce, so that the U.S. military and naval fleet cannot get to the Indo–Pacific fast enough, they would have to do it ... and they would do it. And now we’d have a major problem on our hands,” he said.

After Rubio’s visit, Panama said on Feb. 2 that it would not renew its agreement with Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative when the current one expires next year.

A Prelude to US–China Confrontation Worldwide

Chinese companies have also contacted Li’s CK Hutchinson to buy the rights to operate the two ports in Panama, according to Chinese media reports, which said that the partners and scale of the deal might change.

April 2 is an important milestone when CK Hutchinson and the U.S. consortium led by BlackRock will sign a definitive agreement.

Liao said the chance that a Chinese company can become a buyer is slim and that Trump could press Panama to make the port rights no longer available to private businesses. If that’s the case, Li would no longer be able to sell the rights. If the rights were revoked after the deal, the Chinese buyer would end up with nothing.

According to Liao, the United States cannot afford for the CCP to win the power struggle over the Panama Canal because if that were to happen, Washington would lose its influence in the world—which runs against Trump’s “Make America Great Again” agenda.

Therefore, the most the CCP could achieve might be to deter other Chinese businessmen from following suit in doing what Li has done, according to Liao.

“The Panama Canal deal is just a prelude in the confrontation between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party,” he added. “In the future, many important strategic assets worldwide will be subject to similar tussles. Then an era of clashes will officially begin.”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/china/beijing-puts-its-thumb-on-panama-canal-deal-5828421?utm_source=China_article_paid&src_src=China_article_paid&utm_campaign=China-2025-03-27-ca&src_cmp=China-2025-03-27-ca&utm_medium=email&est=T57WfpGQZf9KKNPnT73pzTbB%2F%2FHrOu3sgSvhmbUDhxWGxigWV60JYldc6OuvAc6UWaNI&utm_term=news2&utm_content=2

Kennedy to cut 10,000 HHS employees to reduce 'bureaucratic sprawl'

 

By Brett Rowland   |   The Center Square   |   27 March 2025

https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_5929ecb6-9c40-4dd2-b0ec-f9b362614b30.html

(The Center Square) – Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced a significant restructuring of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on Thursday in a move to streamline the huge federal agency and cut costs.

Kennedy plans to trim about 10,000 employees from the agency's workforce in addition to employees who left as part of a Deferred Resignation Program, similar to a buy out, earlier this year. The move is expected to save about $1.8 billion. 

Kennedy said the restructuring won't affect the agency's critical services. When combined with HHS' other efforts, including early retirement, the changes are expected to reduce the agency's headcount from 82,000 to 62,000 full-time employees. The restructuring will also align the department with Kennedy's goals for a healthier U.S. population. 

"We aren't just reducing bureaucratic sprawl. We are realigning the organization with its core mission and our new priorities in reversing the chronic disease epidemic," Kennedy said. "This Department will do more – a lot more – at a lower cost to the taxpayer."

Kennedy also said the restructuring of the department's 28 divisions will get rid of redundant units, consolidating them into "15 new divisions, including a new Administration for a Healthy America, or AHA, and will centralize core functions such as Human Resources, Information Technology, Procurement, External Affairs, and Policy." Regional offices will be reduced from 10 to 5.

The overhaul will implement the new "HHS priority of ending America's epidemic of chronic illness by focusing on safe, wholesome food, clean water, and the elimination of environmental toxins. These priorities will be reflected in the reorganization of HHS."

Kennedy also said the restructuring would improve taxpayers' experience with HHS by making the agency more responsive and efficient. He also said the changes would ensure that Medicare, Medicaid, and other essential health services remain intact.

The Administration for a Healthy America will combine multiple agencies – the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Health Resources and Services Administration, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health — into a single, unified entity, Kennedy said.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will get the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, which is responsible for national disaster and public health emergency response.

"Over time, bureaucracies like HHS become wasteful and inefficient even when most of their staff are dedicated and competent civil servants," Kennedy said. "This overhaul will be a win-win for taxpayers and for those that HHS serves."

Among the cuts: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration will shed about 3,500 full-time employees. Officials said the reduction won't affect drug, medical device, or food reviewers, nor will it impact inspectors. The CDC will drop about 2,400 employees. The National Institutes of Health will cut about 1,200 employees. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services will cut about 300 employees. The reorganization won't affect Medicare and Medicaid services, officials said.

Malicious Imbeciles

posted by J. Robert Smith at American Thinker 

In our dawning Era of Common Sense, here’s some common sense. If you unchain junkyard dogs, you better be sure they won’t bite you in the rear. Democrats are being bitten in their collective behind lately. Not just once but repeatedly. Siccing DEI and woke dogs on folk -- those not them -- is turning on them. It’s a big part of what’s devouring the ex-party of Jefferson and Jackson.

In today’s hip, urban, dwindling Democrat Party, the dumb and untalented have been promoted while the best and brightest scoundrels take back seats. (Best and brightest are relative terms.)

James Carville, an old scoundrel Clintonite, stews in frustration. Carville shrieks every now and then from Nah ‘leans about the awful state and rapid fall of his ancestral party. Yet, James undercuts his angst-ridden eruptions by having endorsed garrulous nitwit Kamala Harris for president. Maybe stupid is contagious? Masking and an mRNA vaccine offer no protection.

DEI dictates that only the most superficial qualities possessed by humans count. The focus is on skin color, gender, and fashionable sexual preferences. In practice, leaning on those superficialities has ruinous consequences. Innocents suffer, but now, so do dastardly Democrats. Hallelujah. Democrats’loss is the Republicans’ gain.

We’re awaiting the NTSB findings about the Black Hawk helicopter that collided midair with an American Eagle jet on approach to Reagan National. Sixty-four civilian passengers and the helicopter crew perished. Was it an instrument glitch? It wasn’t the weather. Was it pilot error? What more will we learn about the female crew captain (may she RIP)? Will inconvenient truths be papered over?

During Joe Biden’s figurehead presidency, the greasy fingers of DEI were smeared all over the military. Pete Hegseth and his team are making strides in scrubbing away DEI’s dirty effects on military culture. It can’t happen fast enough.

In the Democrats’ box-check world, to make it as leaders, talking heads, or just garden variety activists, qualifications are these: female, nonbinary, gay, black, brown, and maybe red but often not yellow. Asians are prone to succeed on merit as are Indians -- the subcontinent variety -- even though they’re of browner hue. Authentic females who have chosen childlessness in favor of their careers are venerated. Males, of whatever sexual stripe and color, must never overpower females -- real or imagined. Masculinity is toxic. A certain aura of neuteredness is de rigueur. Houseboys need to know their places.

A must: Tune into CNN for the latest lineup of box-checks -- save Scott Jennings, a straight white guy conservative who, through some magic, has embedded himself on studio panels. Will Jennings’ routine schoolin’ of his woke mates lead to his ouster?

Militancy is the common bond under the rainbow. Flyover country folk would say old-fashioned, chip-on-the-shoulder ‘tude is more like it. Box-checkers have suckled resentment from the bosoms of public-school teachers, tenured professors, corporate media, and pop culture. They were wet-nursed to be vipers.

Socially inbred, progressive whites are welcome to play support roles so long as they exhibit scowls, which express underlying consternation at alleged injustices. Most of these whites crowd east and west coast cities and college towns everywhere. Many are upscale. They fancy themselves smarter than everyone else. They don’t flagellate themselves for their privilege. Instead, they flog decent, sober working-class and middle-income folk for the crime of “white privilege” -- even if they’re Hispanic, aforementioned Asians, or “Uncle Toms,” as self-starting blacks like Clarence Thomas are described.

Rich, progressive whites pen fat checks to allay their guilt and/or to stoke righteous militancy. George Soros’ mini-me, Alex, strokes big checks. He feels no guilt, only seething contempt for America.

Related to that, the eruptions of angst and bitterness directed at Elon Musk’s Tesla appear coordinated more than spontaneous. Musk’s offense is DOGE -- or his latest offense. Helping elect Trump was his first great stain. Working at 47’s behest, DOGE is taking a scythe to Uncle Sam’s multibillion-dollar boondoggles.

That doesn’t sit well with the progressive walking dead -- from D.C. lifers to academics to corporate welfarists to grudging bureaucrats to 159-year-olds in Social Security’s database to rainbow-hued minions. USAID is more than a boondoggle. It’s emblematic of the extensive money laundering done in Washington. It lines pockets and is used to spread woke’s warped gospel across the world. The skulking CIA appears to have a hand in how monies are dispersed.

“Stupid is as stupid does,” claimed Forrest Gump. Keying Tesla cars under the watchful eye of onboard security cameras is the hallmark of advanced social warrior brain-rot. Vandalizing Tesla stores is akin to ninja-clad, pro-killing-babies-in-the-womb sneaks defacing churches, though Tesla properties are now better surveilled. Torching Teslas -- electric vehicles, last checked -- in acts of felonious defiance is so incredibly hypocritical that Bill Maher has mocked the perpetrators. Saving the planet comes in a distant second to keeping the federal milk cows pumping milk. Let the arrests roll across the fruited plain like thunderclaps.

Disney’s flop-in-progress, Snow White, budgeted at an estimated $250 million, may prove the tip of Everest in terms of woke and DEI folly. At X, Benny Johnson observed that Snow White’s big production number at the movie’s close looks like an L.A. street party. The flick’s star, a Latina named Rachel Zegler -- is she descended from a German who fled to Colombia after WWII? -- says that spouting woke garbage won’t harm her career. She knows her audience. They aren’t moviegoers in Des Moines and Tulsa. They’re coastal inbreds and Hollyweird rulers.

If a white leads, like lyin’ Chuck Schumer, he must bend a knee in submission to the woke gods. Tribute buys time, though in Chuck’s case, the precocious Latinx, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, is rumored to be gunning for his Senate seat in 2028. Who knows, maybe AOC will take Manhattan by storm? Plenty of well-heeled East and West Side New Yorkers will write AOC guilt checks if she takes the plunge.

A college degree awarded at an Ivy League school is a box-checker’s bonanza. Admission offices don’t care about SAT scores anymore. Academic rigor is two-tiered. Box checks get to occupy the far lower tier.

Whether it’s a sheepskin in law or Third World pottery, either opens doors to the oppressed. Plagiarizing research is winked at if you fit certain categories. Plagiarists are just striving to overcome historical injustices. Bullying Jewish kids on campus is okay. Hate speech is free speech, though when it leads to thuggery, well, it’s still labeled free speech. Campus nannies turn blind eyes.

Yet, comes a new sheriff named Donald J. Trump. He just smacked Columbia University upside the head. He declared no more federal moola unless Columbia’s president, Katrina Armstrong, puts an end to the Brownshirts’ predation on her campus. Armstrong buckled. Cashflow trumpsrationalized Jew-hatred.

Trump’s election busted a dam. Four-plus years of rampant wokeness, DEI nostrums, and insidious programs caused fair-minded Americans to reject Democrats at the polls. They’ve had enough of that glop shoved down their throats. Democrats, fattened on conceit, believed they had part of the formula to remaking America, giving them tight control of society. Flooding the nation with illegals was another means. Instead, if Trump’s common-sense counterrevolution sinks roots, Democrats will be booted to no man’s land. Spending a generation slogging through mud sounds good. Forever sounds better.