Monday, March 3, 2025

Zelensky’s Terrible, Horrible, Very Bad, No Good Day


It was an eventful week, with the SDNY FBI office apparently defying Attorney General Pam Bondi’s demand that it turn over all its Epstein files to her. Newly confirmed FBI director Kash Patel headed over there to search the premises and interview staff to find out where they are or even if they still exist. The week ended with a blowup of what was supposed to be the signing of an agreement between the Ukraine and the U.S., a preliminary step for opening negotiations with Russia to end the war. How you view the consequences of the blowup seems like an inkblot test: If you see the U.S. abandoning a faithful ally, you probably are a Democrat. If you see Volodymyr Zelensky as an arrogant grifter who overplayed his hand, you probably aren’t.

Luckily the entire meeting is  so you can see for yourself the context in which the last few minutes occurred. Those few minutes being the only thing most viewers saw.    

Not without basis, President Trump believes that China, not Russia, is a bigger threat to this country and disengaging Russia from this fight will further our chances of drawing Putin away from alliances with China. Not without reason, the President believes the war is a meat grinder, an ongoing stalemate which could well lead to World War III if Ukraine is admitted to NATO and more weaponry and manpower from elsewhere are poured into the conflict. Not without reason, the President thinks both Russia and Ukraine have suffered substantial human and economic losses which will only continue unless both sides make some concessions and none of the suggested concessions he has hinted at supporting jeopardize either country’s vital interests. Not without reason, the President wants to know to what use Ukraine put all the billions of dollars we gave them to defend itself from Russia.

Zelensky has three times indicated a willingness to with us, granting us mineral rights. The president thinks that once we establish that we have these interests in Ukraine, Putin will not further attack. Zelensky, doubtless egged on by those who wish the war to continue, wants a promise of more concrete security guarantees -- i.e., NATO troops on the ground and more military equipment -- but he nevertheless agreed to sign on to this, once in a meeting with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant when he said he’d sign at Munich, again in a second meeting at Munich when he said he'd sign at Washington, and a third time when he was invited to do so in the Oval Office. Having pledged three times to do so, in a public meeting in the White House (in which disrespectfully he appeared in some kind of athleisure wear) he regularly interrupted the president, insisted once again on a firm security pledge, not only the mineral rights agreement. He rolled his eyes, shook his head, and brought his country’s ambassador to tears with his performance. Finally, he was escorted out of the White House without an opportunity to enjoy the luncheon planned for him. The post-signing press conference which had been scheduled was cancelled. Zelensky clearly misjudged his bargaining strength or the consequences of this stunt.

I’m quite sure his fanciful overestimation of his strength and the U.S. support for him was due to people like Antony Blinken, Victoria Nuland, and Alexander Vindman, who reportedly encouraged this intransigence to come to terms, and equally toothless and discredited EU officials and members. 

Shortly after the contretemps Alexander Dubinsky, a member of the Ukrainian parliament, presently a prisoner of the regime, posted that this outburst marked “the final act of the regime’s collapse.”

I was thrown into prison not for a crime, but for speaking the truth. The very truth that Trump has now stated: Zelensky has lost. He has no cards left to play, he is running out of soldiers, and the country has reached a dead end due to his stubbornness. I demand the immediate convening of an emergency session of the Parliament, where Parliament must initiate impeachment proceedings against Zelensky for: - the failure of foreign policy, which has led to Ukraine's international isolation and the loss of allied support. - a lost war, which is the result of incompetent leadership and catastrophic decisions. - violations of citizens' rights and the usurpation of power, manifested in the suppression of the opposition, persecution of dissenters, and authoritarian rule. I appeal to all Members of the Ukrainian Parliament: stop wasting time, stop waiting! Zelensky is bankrupt. Zelensky is not Ukraine! It is time to put him on trial. If he cannot offer a real way out of the crisis, then it is up to us to make fateful decisions. Zelensky thought he could rule Ukraine through force. Now he has lost. Ukraine must decide - will it continue its freefall into the abyss, or will it begin the fight for true independence?

Cooler heads than those who advised him to “stand tall” and be tough, obviously got Zelensky’s ear because he quickly asked to come back to the White House but Trump refused, saying he couldn’t do that. Instead, he officially halted all weapon shipments to Ukraine. Secretary of State Marco Rubio terminated U.S. support for the restoration of Ukraine’s energy grid. Certainly, the audit of the over $175 billion Trump’s presidential predecessor sent to Ukraine will be expedited and strengthened. The EU, whose position had been “why don’t you (the U.S.) fight Russia to save Europe” is suggesting they’ll step into the breach, but they’ve neither the military might nor funds and weaponry to contribute. Statements of support aren’t like, you know, actual support. No one seems to wants to die for the EU in the muddy fields of Ukraine (not even Ukrainians who are being forcibly conscripted on the streets). 

The President’s final words on the matter:

Much was learned that could never be understood without conversation under such fire and pressure. It’s amazing what comes out through emotion, and I have determined that President Zelenskyy is not ready for Peace if America is involved, because he feels our involvement gives him a big advantage in negotiations. I don’t want advantage, I want PEACE. He disrespected the United States of America in its cherished Oval Office. He can come back when he is ready for Peace.

Here’s my take: A clear-eyed, masterful negotiator looked at the field, came up with what he believes is the best available deal for his client (us) and the world and a posturing midget egged on by arrogant armchair warriors failed to grab it. Instead,  Zelensky used this opportunity to insult his strongest benefactor and seems stunned to learn that was a stupid move. If this administration had a coat of arms, it would be encircled by a motto reading “FAFO.”



X22, And we Know, and more- March 3rd

 



Victor Davis Hanson: Zelenskyy Bites the Hand That Feeds Him Billions of...

Victor Davis Hanson: Zelenskyy Bites the Hand That Feeds Him Billions of Dollars Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy strolled into the White House using the same strategy he employed with President Joe Biden, which turned out to be his fatal flaw argues Victor Davis Hanson on today’s edition of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words.” “ I think Mr. Zelenskyy, in some ways, is a sympathetic character. He needs American weapons, but he kept arguing and arguing, and interrupting the president of the United States, who kept trying to remind him that without American weapons—and the number is disputed because it includes weaponry, economic assistance, and other types of U.S. aid. “ Without the United States, he would be nowhere. Europe talks a great game. All of Europe together, all 28, 29 nations of the EU, 32 nations of NATO have given less than the United States alone. And they will not come to his aid. “ He was flown in on a U.S. military jet. He met Democratic politicians. He met union workers in a munitions factory and basically said to them, 'These jobs are essential to us.' Subtext: 'You wouldn't want to lose your jobs by voting for Donald Trump, who might cut off aid.' That was a terrible mistake."

Trump And Vance’s Finest Moment


Everything about President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance kicking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s sorry, begging, petulant, pompous, entitled ass out of the White House last Friday is the perfect encapsulation of America First foreign policy in practice, not just in theory. This is exactly what I voted for, and I couldn’t be more proud of our leaders for practicing what they preach, consequences and optics be damned.

From start to finish, that White House press conference was a diplomatic masterclass in not just pragmatism and defending American interests but also what to do when confronted with lies, veiled insults, weirdly deceptive threats (yeah, the staffer who probably showed Zelensky Red Dawn as meeting prep should absolutely be fired!), and all around boorish behavior from someone who is clearly used to being worshipped and catered to by world leaders everywhere.

The fact that Zelensky thought his globetrotting circus act would play in front of Trump and Vance with no pushback shows that the Ukrainian dictator, who also strangely thinks he can win the ongoing war against Russia, is more deluded than any of us ever imagined. To their credit, they were mostly patient for the first 40 minutes of that clown show, but when Zelensky began questioning the very idea of diplomacy itself, Vance and Trump soon after had had enough.

Things went downhill fast at that point, and if you’re an America First type, watching Trump and Vance surgically berate Zelensky for basically being an entitled, ungrateful little b*tch was a thing of beauty. But the best part was how it ticked off all the right people. Virtually every Democrat and neocon from John Bolton to John Brennan was shocked, shocked, I tell you, that Trump dared be less than civil to the modern-day Churchill. Well, I never!

The lunch went uneaten by its intended guests, and Zelensky went back across the pond with his tail between his legs, carrying a host of supportive X posts from cucked world leaders with nothing of substance to offer but zero deals brokered by the good ole U S of A. He and his legion of supporters worldwide continue to refuse to see or consider the obvious realities on the ground that Trump and Vance see: Ukraine can’t win the war outright, even with continued help and giving the kind of help it would take to actually win it (i.e. nuclear) would result in World War III, an outcome nobody should want.

In fact, what most reasonable, non-brainwashed people SHOULD want is for their country to at least be on non-enemy terms with other nuclear powers. Yet, for some reason, expressing the desire to be civil with Russia has become an unpardonable sin, at least to leftists and neocons. But it makes zero sense, unless of course there are nefarious motives for them to think this way.

I wouldn’t want to live in Russia, at least while the USA, for the most part, remains a Constitutional Republic. I will always prefer that to a de facto dictatorship. Still, the assertion by so many people whose opinions I detest on every other issue that they are or should be our ‘enemy’ seems dubious. WHY does Russia have to be our enemy? I still have never heard a logical answer.

From where I’m sitting, the left thinks so only because Russia is run by anti-woke elements and is perceived as having helped Trump. They don’t put up with gender ideology and the other woke BS that has infected the West. That’s it. That’s the reason. It’s not the killing or the invading because if it were any of those things, they would have hated the communist old Soviet Union, but they loved that, didn’t they? 

And the neocon right hates Russia partially for the same reason, because at heart they’re leftists, but also because those psychos are itching for another bloody world war. So yeah, I know I’m supposed to hate Russia, but I’m having a tough time mustering the emotion. Hating the left and the neocons though? Now that’s easy!

Sadly, the fact that Zelensky and his supporters are happy to continue to kidnap Ukrainian men off the streets to be devoured by the Russian meat grinder says a lot about how little they, despite their endless virtue-signaling, actually value human life. For his part, Trump is trying to broker a deal between two untrustworthy dictators. That’s a tall order, even for him. But, given the willingness he displayed to walk away when things weren’t going the way they should have gone if anyone can succeed, he can.



Where Do You Go After 'Literally Hitler'?


Every Republican president is Hitler, of course, but Donald Trump is somehow even Hitlerer than all of them. It was a theme in his first term, but during this election, even the corrupt eggplant masquerading as the incumbent got into the act. Trump was Hitler – no, he was Super Hitler. He was more Hitler than Hitler. And it’s a constant theme among the lesser lights of the Democrat Party. “This is what fascism looks like,” intone very serious politicians who seem to have no idea what fascism looks like. And the Trump/Hitler thing is all over social media. Every day, as Trump exercises the legitimate powers granted to him by the American people via winning the election, another leftist mediocrity with a five-digit follower account figuratively throws up his, her, or their soft, girlish hands and says, “OK. I’m calling it – he’s Hitler.”

A different news organization than the Associated Press gets to ask Trump questions. Hitler!

Layout do-nothing government flunkies get asked to give five bullet points about what they’ve done in the last week to demonstrate their value to the American people. Hitler!

He lets feminine euroweenies know that the United States is no longer going to pick up the tab for their national defense so they can focus on giving free stuff to Third World invaders even as they arrest their own people for the crime of speaking freely. Hitler!

Elon lifted his right arm. Oh yeah, Hitler!

Whatever. It’s all stupid, and it doesn’t work anymore if it ever worked at all. You can’t call Trump “Hitler” for the nearly ten years since he came down the escalator in the farthest thing ever from a Leni Riefenstahl rally and, after he fails to grow a tiny mustache, start wearing Hugo Boss uniforms and invade Poland, expect people to take it seriously. And people don’t care. It’s now just background noise. Trump is Hitler. What else is new? What else you got?

“He’s Hitler” is a shorthand for leftist disapproval, much like the term “racist.” If you’re not a leftist – and sometimes if you are – you’re a racist. It’s not what you’ve done. It’s who you are. And the term is tossed around so promiscuously no one respects it. It doesn’t matter if you do thing X that they say is racist because you’re still going to be racist anyway. You can’t win. And when you can’t win, it’s not fair. And when it’s not fair, no one takes it seriously. It becomes a joke. No one cares. It’s like the boy who cried wolf, except they don’t teach that story in schools anymore because it privileges the male gender experience. And no, the story wouldn’t work if the boy who cried wolf were the she-male who cried wolf because the trans folks are often the ones crying “wolf,” and they hate irony almost as much as using the right restroom.

There’s no point in explaining that America First people aren’t racist, just like there’s no point in demonstrating that Donald Trump is not only not literally Hitler, but not Hitler in any sense of the word, nor Hitler adjacent in any way, shape, or form. Trump is a lot of things, but a disciplined, hard-core ideologue who obsesses over the lives of others to the point of starting programs against them is not one of them. It’s all of a kind with the mental defectives who don those red handmaiden costumes to warn of the Trumpian sexual repression that awaits them at some date that is ever receding into the future. Yeah, there’s nothing Donald Trump hates more than a beautiful, uncovered woman. That’s why he spent the first 40 years in the public eye, wandering around Manhattan with his burka-clad concubines.

That it is all so embarrassingly stupid may actually be the point of the exercise. Remember that the leftists have this thing demonstrating their fealty to the movement by loudly and publicly proclaiming that which is obviously, utterly untrue. By abdicating any shred of dignity in this way, they sacrifice their own integrity on the altar of Marxist nonsense. “Look at me! Look what I’m willing to do for the cause! Trump is Hitler! Men can have vaginas! Joe Biden is honest and not at all demented! I will say what must be said to prevail! This is the depth of my commitment!”

It’s easy to see this as insane, but it should be seen as insidious. Certainly, there are stupid people who believe this nonsense. Rep. Jasmine Crockett comes to mind, as she always does when the word “stupid” gets tossed around. But others aren’t so dumb. They’re intelligent in the sense that they’re able to process information and do not need to be reminded to breathe. They understand that no, Donald Trump is not Hitler or even Hitlerish. They just don’t care. They assume that those listening to them are either stupid enough to believe them, which is a satisfactory outcome, or, better, that the listeners will appreciate the depths of their commitment as demonstrated by lying, loudly and publicly, for the good of the party.

Normal people just think it’s stupid, and that’s kind of a problem. All the people susceptible to this nonsense have long ago been self-selected and enlisted in the struggle. The challenge now is to appeal to the masses, and the masses don’t see stating obvious mistruths as either persuasive or honorable. Why would they listen to someone who’s telling them that Trump is a dictator when they just voted for Trump? The underlying premise is that Trump’s rule is illegitimate, but a plurality and near majority of Americans voted for Trump, meaning when you call Trump “Hitler,” you’re basically telling nearly half of Americans that they have no legitimate claim to participate in their own governance via elections. A lot of Americans, particularly those of us who escaped from communist countries like my wife or served their country in war like me, take that personally. It stops being funny when the real message becomes clear – that our attempts to act as American citizens are morally illegitimate, not because of anything we’ve done or Trump did, but because the Hitler hollerers are mad that they’re not in office anymore.

So, what do they do? They can hardly go harder. What’s harder than the malignant Austrian housepainter? What are they going to say, that he’s Double Secret Hitler? When you cross the Hitler line, there’s not much of anywhere else to go. They could focus on his personal proclivities, and they have, and Americans have made their peace with those allegations that they believe and ignored the ones they don’t. But when calling somebody a sex pervert, racist, reincarnation of Hitler only earns a shrug, you can’t really double down. You’ve already tripled down.

Now, they could go in the other direction. They could attack Trump and his policies substantively. But this has several problems, not the least of which is that his policies are substantively awesome. One is that they don’t know how to do this. Leftists haven’t had to argue for decades. It’s the “The Daily Show” effect. They are smart, you see, so they don’t contend with the ideas of the bad people; they mock the bad people. The bad people are unworthy of having their ideas refuted. They should simply accept that they suck and submit. But what happens when the normal people stop caring about your insults and jibes? Then you’ve got nothing. 

Plus, there’s another problem – if you meaningfully contend with the views of the bad people, your own side is going to accuse you of normalizing them. This is weird because these people are normal. But the left’s strategy in this century has been to place every idea besides those it embraces outside of the allowed range of views. The natural response of the American populist movement has been to accept that challenge – we’re not going to argue with them either. We’re just going to take power, use it to the fullest, and let them cry about it, because they’re going to cry one way or the other.

That’s the Hitler part, the part where we win an election and dare to impose our policies. That’s what Trump’s done in the last couple of months. He’s made no apologies for using the powers the Constitution invests in the presidency. This freaks out the left because they’ve been able to browbeat past Republicans, including Trump during his first term when he was surrounded by squishes for much of it, into not using the full scope of their authority. Perhaps having the left try to put him in jail for the rest of his life, if not murder him, gave Trump a different perspective this time. Now, he’s using his constitutional powers as intended, which doesn’t make him Hitler. It makes him worse than that to the left. It makes him effective.




🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Pete Hegseth Just Obliterated Hillary Clinton

Sarah Arnold reporting for Townhall 

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth didn’t hold back when he responded to twice-failed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's recent remarks accusing him of "cowering to Vladimir Putin." The former Fox News host fiercely defended his stance, calling out Clinton’s baseless attack and making it clear that his views on Russia are rooted in a pragmatic, America-first approach. Hegseth's fiery rebuttal shot down Clinton’s claims, with him pointing to the need for a more strategic, measured approach to dealing with global threats.

On Sunday, Clinton took to social media to taunt Hegseth, sharing an article from Gizmodo titled, “Trump’s Defense Secretary Hegseth Orders Cyber Command to ‘Stand Down’ on All Russia Operations.” 

“It appears that the U.S. no longer considers Russia a significant cyber threat, according to multiple news reports on a drastic policy reversal that has taken hold under the new Trump administration,” the article read. “The cybersecurity outlet The Record originally reported that under Trump’s new Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, U.S. Cyber Command has been ordered to stand down from all planning against Russia, including offensive digital actions.” The outlet cites three anonymous sources who are familiar with the matter. The order reportedly does not apply to the National Security Agency.” 

Attached to her X post, Clinton wrote, “Wouldn’t want to hurt Putin’s feelings.” 

In response, Hegseth posted a photo of then-Secretary of State Clinton attempting to “reset”  relations with Russia. His post referenced an event from March 2009, when Clinton announced that the Obama Administration would push the "reset" button with Russia. However, while presenting the proposal, they mistakenly spelled "overcharge" instead of “reset.” 

In 2014, Clinton told NPR that “the reset worked” with Russia. Just days later, she told CNN that she was the “most skeptical” of the Russian “reset” policy.



SHOCK POLL: Frank Luntz Shares the Results on Zelensky Freakout--Trump Will Love It


Becca Lower reporting for RedState 

Pollster Frank Luntz conducted a series of shock polls--albeit somewhat unscientific ones--on the X platform after Zelensky suffered a total freakout in the Oval Office meet-up with President Trump and VP Vance--and he released the final results on Saturday. As I highlight here, the polling is not real, but it's worth mulling over a snapshot like this, I think. And whatever your opinion on Luntz's biases, stick with me here.

 As you'll see shortly, the Democrats will hate how many people answered, with the heat of a thousand dying suns--and what Luntz says it means for Tuesday's Joint Address to Congress will put a yuge smile on Pres. Trump's face. In case you missed the, well, incident on Friday, here are the latest stories at RedState:

Intentionally Sabotaged: Democrats Encouraged Zelensky to Scoff at a Possible Peace Deal, Setting Up Oval Office Blowout

Including those, you can find all of our coverage of the Zelensky implosion at the WH here.

All right, let's take a look at the two questions that the pollster asked X users:

"After yesterday‘s White House meeting, whom are you angrier at?" and gave just two options: "Volodymyr Zelenskyy [sic]" or "Donald Trump and JD Vance."

As a follow-up, Luntz asked: "At this point in the Russia-Ukraine war, whom are you more sympathetic towards?"--and the choice offered is (obviously) binary, as well:" Volodymyr Zelenskyy" or "Vladimir Putin."

Here are the results:

Hoo boy, there are a few things to digest here, as Luntz writes in his analysis, which he published to X late Saturday evening: [Emphasis original]

The United States isn’t changing…

It has changed.  

Three years ago, Americans were overwhelmingly supportive of Ukraine and they considered Zelensky to be a global hero. Today, a majority of Americans oppose the war and Zelensky is now a controversial character.

President Trump is on his way to being the most impactful, consequential president since FDR.  And his supporters are more loyal to him than any president since Andrew Jackson.

To be clear: I am not making a judgment on either Ukraine, Zelensky, or President Trump.  I am merely noting what the polls are saying. 

The closing bit--Pres. Trump will love it more than anything else--has Luntz stating flatly that "...based on these results, this Tuesday night’s State Of The Union address should have a very big audience."

Consider, also, the fact that the legacy media and the useful idiots on the Left will grill Luntz for this--as he notes himself above--lends credibility to what he is saying ultimately.

There is no upside for him to do this, which can be a mighty persuasive crucible these days when so much broadcast by the media/some social media personalities needs to be taken with a boulder of salt. Good on Luntz here.



DNI Tulsi Gabbard Notes the EU/NATO Hypocrisy President Trump will Not Support

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard appears on Fox News to discuss the goal of the Trump administration toward Russia and Ukraine.

Within the discussion DNI Gabbard draws attention to the hypocrisy of Ukraine and the EU as they define democracy yet reject free speech, block and manipulate elections and shut down the voices of their own people.  Gabbard has very clear eyes in support of President Trump.  WATCH:



Ric Grenell Obliterates Susan Rice's Argument That Trump Is Selling Out Ukraine and Sucking Up to Putin


 Bob Hoge reporting for RedState 

Hoo boy, there was some heated back and forth taking place on social media over the weekend as former Obama adviser Susan Rice is getting hammered for her claims that the Zelensky SmackDown in the Oval Office™ Friday was all a setup by Team Trump.

As we reported, the Ukrainian president was cut down a notch or two (or three) when he disrespected the United States in the White House over President Trump’s efforts to ensure peace between Ukraine and Russia after three years of war.

Former National Security Adviser, Ambassador to the U.N., and Barack Obama acolyte Susan Rice, considered by many to be the epitome of the Deep State, weighed in Friday to proclaim that the whole thing was a setup by Team Trump and that the episode was an “an embarrassment for the United States on the world stage.”


'I've Never Seen Anything Like Zelensky's Behavior There': Speaker Mike Johnson interviewed on 'Meet the Press'

Former Obama Advisor Susan Rice Shows Where Her Loyalties Lie—Claims Zelensky Meltdown Was a 'Setup'


The Federalist’s editor in chief Mollie Hemingway was none too impressed by Rice’s message. In a long X post Saturday, she said Rice and other globalists pushed Zelensky in advance to make a scene:

As I said, her post is long, but here is one of her key takeaways:

Zelensky repeatedly declined opportunities to sign the deal in Kyiv and Munich, and requested the meeting at the White House. It later came out that Rice and Tony Blinken, Victoria Nuland, and Alexander Vindman may have been personally advising Zelensky to do this meeting in the way he did -- that they recommended him to be hostile and to try to goad Trump into blowing up.

But we’re just getting started here in this social media war. Rice fired back:

For the record, I have never met Zelenskyy and never spoken to him. Ever. Or advised him or anybody around him. 

It’s a shame that you contend that it is in the U.S. national interest to sell out Ukraine and suck up to Putin.

Man, it’s getting hot in here. Enter Special Presidential Envoy Ric Grenell, who blasted Rice into next year with his post:

Donald Trump handed you peace in the Middle East and Europe - you handed us two wars. We see you.

Oof, that’s going to leave a mark.

Hemingway and Grenell are right to be critical of Susan Rice and Team Obama. She misled the nation about the 2012 al-Qaeda-affiliated attack on our embassy in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens, saying it was “spontaneous” and was caused by a video. She’s been wrong on multiple subjects since, and now appears to be taking Zelensky’s side over America's.

The Obama years—along with his failed apologist policies—are long over.



"Most People Have No Idea What Is Coming...| Tucker Carlson"

The AI revolution is here, but are we ready?

Tucker Carlson sits down with billionaire investor Ray Dalio to unpack the unprecedented transformation coming in the next five years. AI is not just improving efficiency—it’s changing everything, from economics to war, from governance to medicine.
Dalio warns that we’re entering an era of extreme complexity, where AI can outthink humans across every domain.

But with no game plan in place, who’s really in control? As global competition heats up and nations prioritize their own survival, is the world on the brink of chaos—or a new order? Buckle up—this is a conversation you can’t afford to miss.


♦️𝐖³𝐏 𝐃𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝

 


W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Welcome to the W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Post whatever you got in the comments section below.

This feature will post every day at 6:30am Mountain time. 

 

British PM Announces U.K. Troops Will be “Boots on the Ground in Ukraine” Leading a “Coalition of the Willing”


Following a widely watched assembly of EU leaders, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announces that Britain will lead a “coalition of the willing” and the U.K. will put boots on the ground and planes in the air to create the “security guarantee” for a potential Russia-Ukraine ceasefire.

The Prime Minister did not specify any other European country who will align and join their military forces on the ground in Ukraine; instead outlining that additional military elements will be rapidly organized.  PM Starmer stressed that U.S. military forces “must” backstop the EU military members and implied that Italian PM Meloni will only align with the principal of Italian military use if the USA is involved.

As secretary Rubio mentioned earlier in the day, the Ukraine/EU phrase “security guarantee” is more honestly described as “deterrence” or an insurance policy.  Prime Minister Starmer and this EU ‘coalition of the willing’ are only willing to put their military into Ukraine if the USA will be guaranteed to come into the conflict if the ceasefire falls apart.  This should not be a part of any reasonable consideration, given the 3rd parties (not Russia) that would intentionally seek to disrupt a ceasefire to suck the USA into battle.  WATCH: 



None of the other EU nations are willing to publicly say they will put their military into Ukraine, because the EU just doesn’t have a military force capable to deal with the conflict.