Monday, February 24, 2025

CPAC 2025 was All About The Love


Another year, another Washington, DC, CPAC convention—and this one was a doozy. Do you remember how Kamala ran on the concept of joy? Well, the entire conservative movement is running on the concept of joy right now—real joy, not the grim, Democrat-approved fake fun imposed from above, but the genuine article. That was the sense here at CPAC 2025—people were happy, excited, psyched, and joyous.

Why do we have joy? Because of all the winning. And no, we aren’t even close to getting tired of it. 

You could feel it in the audience, on the stage and behind it, and, of course, in the bars. That’s my indicator – was the bar packed? During the Biden years, it got a little slow. People weren’t living it up the way we used to. They were quiet, suppressed, Covid-bound, and generally sullen. But this year, the bar was rocking until about 2 AM, and I mean rocking literally – somebody set up a boombox with 80s music, and people were literally dancing around.

JD Trump came in on the first day and did his JD thing. How great is this guy? We knew he would be good, but we had no right to expect that he would take on all these pompous regime media jerks and social media swells and just level them. That’s the problem for these folks – they’ve been so insular and so inward-looking that they’ve never had to deal with somebody who disagrees with them, especially someone who’s exponentially smarter than they could ever be. And yet, they keep stepping up to the plate. How many times is Margaret Brennan going to have him on and be utterly humiliated by him?

One of the best things about JD is how he’s positioning himself to do eight more years of this glorious work, but he’s not alone. We are seeing the sheer quality of the people who have joined up with Donald Trump in this second administration. Let’s face it: the first administration had way too many mediocrities, half-steppers, and establishment slugs. It wasn’t really Trump’s fault. He didn’t have a giant Rolodex of names to pick from in 2016 because he had barely been to Washington DC before beating Hillary. But now he has four years of experience and spent the last four years figuring out exactly what he would do once he Grover Clevelanded. Now he’s gotten into the office again and doing it.

Promises made, promises kept. 

The result is a Republican base that is ecstatic. At one point, during the main stage appearance by me and Larry O’Connor, along with social media influencer ALX, people were doing the Trump dance in the audience. That’s the thing about the Trump dance. It’s fun. They’re eating the dogs, they’re eating the cats – that’s fun. Winning is fun. And what’s the other side offer? Misery, self-flagellation, and “chicks” peeing standing up. No thanks.

Elon Musk showed up, and the Argentinian president gave him a bureaucracy-cutting chainsaw, which he swung around like a Leatherface on stage. It was glorious. The audience was thrilled, and he was excited to be there. But you know, Elon probably is not as conservative personally as we are. He was blackpilled by the attacks on him when he stepped out of line under Biden. But this guy is not a conservative by any means, yet he’s a welcome part of our coalition. That’s another part of the beauty of what’s happening – this is a coalition. There’s not a lot of theological purity going along. If you walk down media row – and mediate row was longer than I’ve ever seen it, and I’ve been coming here for a decade – you get to the Make America Healthy Again booth. If I remember correctly, a year ago, Robert F Kennedy, Jr., was a liberal democrat, but now he’s head of HHS. And we’re happy about it.

Oh, there are some people who are unhappy about it. I guess winning makes them nervous. National Review put out a cover story warning about not getting too attached to winning after only 30 days. Yeah, we better find that cloud behind the silver lining. Some people just don’t want to win, but those people weren’t at CPAC. I did encounter one guy from the Bulwark, walking around, looking at us as if he were Margaret Mead among the Samoans. I asked him why he wasn’t at Cuckfest – all the Never Trump losers that nobody cares about were having their own event somewhere down the road. The audience was approximately as big as the speaker's list. The only people excited about them gathering in Washington, DC, were their pool boys.

Of course, the president came and was amazing as usual. I did not watch him live, not because I don’t like seeing the president – I’ve had a chance to see him several times here – but because the crowd was just too big, and I don’t like crowds. It was a glorious topper to a great convention-- a convention that was simply amazing. Things were happening every single day we were here. The FBI director is now Kash Patel, if you can imagine it. This is happening. This is real. And it doesn’t stop. Friday night, as we were sipping beers, we got word that a bunch of woke generals and admirals in the Pentagon had been fired. The winning never seems to end.

And there were well-deserved victory laps. The great Julie Kelly, whose defense of the J6 political prisoners has been second to none, once again had a prime showcase. The media tried to make something out of some fringe J6 people who had a beef with the Secret Service, but CPAC has always been 100% behind these political prisoners. The regime media tried to build up fake controversies with lies and innuendo, and do you know what happened? Nothing. No one cared. We don’t listen to them anymore. That was the point of Larry’s and my presentation – the regime media doesn’t get a vote anymore. We weren’t complaining about the regime media and its headlock on social discourse anymore. They defended their gates while we’ve torn down their walls. We were laughing at its total ineptitude in the face of new media.

That was CPAC 2025, the laughing, smiling, and dancing. These are great times. This is a golden age. I guess National Review is right in the macro—it won’t last forever, and there will be bad days in the future. But these are the good days. This is an amazing moment. We must embrace it and keep it going as long as we can.



X22, And we Know, and more- Feb 24

 



0:00 / 0:00

15 seconds

15 seconds

0:00 / 0:00

15 seconds

15 seconds

President Trump of the 30 (and a Couple) Days


It’s been an exhausting four weeks for anyone watching the administration’s effort to reshape, modernize, and . It’s been an avalanche of Executive Orders, confirmation hearings, court battles, and staff reshufflings and removals. “The choice was between a slow canoe ride through more of the same, or a roller coaster. Americans chose the roller coaster.”

A lot of things have been made clear. The most significant is that as things were going, the roles of the president and Congress had been largely diminished in recent years. Unelected bureaucrats in the U.S. Treasury were in charge of disbursing the money allocated by the federal budget to bureaucrats elsewhere who shaped the laws and policies in a manner making it almost impossible to audit. Nothing could have been more fake. A return to constitutional governance was possible only if the system was altered, . 

The (TAS) is an identification code linking a Treasury payment to a budget line item (standard financial process). In the Federal Government, the TAS field was optional for ~$4.7 Trillion in payments and was often left blank, making traceability almost impossible. As of Saturday, this is now a required field, increasing insight into where money is actually going. Thanks to  for the great work.

There has been a substantial change in staffing among agencies and departments, among these:

At the Department of Defense, enlistments are up and woke is dismantled: Secretary Pete Hegseth has fired the Naval Chief, the Vice Chief of the Air Force and the Judge Advocate Generals for the Army, Navy, and Air Force. There is no possibility of a strong defense when the military is more concerned with pronouns than battle readiness, diverting military funds for expensive transitioning of recruits, and choosing officers on anything but demonstrated capabilities to lead. 5,400 civilian employees were also fired in the short time Hegseth has been in office.

Within days of confirmation, Kash Patel, the new director of the FBI ordered 1,500 agents relocated from Washington, D.C.: 1,000 to areas where there have been spikes in crime and 500 to Huntsville, Alabama.

The attempt to shutter the USAID and fire all but a small number of the thousands employed there which had been halted by a district court temporary restraining order is now back on track, the court having considered that .

Citing in particular imagined hardships to those stationed abroad, federal unions had challenged the cuts and questioned their constitutionality. In the latest round, Judge Carl Nichols held that as the agency has not been abolished, workers involved must avail themselves of existing federal employment laws to challenge their firings, not federal district courts. Cuts to the agency funds will now proceed as well. As this was an enormous left-wing slush fund, this should put a big dent in their activities.

The Department of Education is on the block and Project Veritas has interviewed an official there who provides evidence that it will require a deep cleansing. DOGE has already cut $900 million the department has been spending on the Institute of Education Sciences. It halted $4.4 billion that remained in a $200 billion COVID relief package (millions of which had already been frivolously spent with no oversight). States which want these funds must first shell out for the expenditures, and DOGE will not release any reimbursements without receipts and department approval. 

The Department of Education has terminated 18 grants for $226M to Comprehensive Centers, which provided consulting services with a large focus on DEI. One Center application stated: “Embedding DEI reviews across all deliverables and materials ensures it is not a one-off task specific activity.” A 2019 study (which itself cost $8M) was “not able to measure the causal impact of the centers’ work”.

Judge Randolph D. Moss of the D.C. federal court declined to bar DOGE from accessing student loan accounts at the Department of Education. 

With so many rice bowls being smashed, you’d be on target to believe there would be many efforts to halt the efforts in courts in those jurisdictions sympathetic to the idea of an expansive federal government, and there have been. Two this week are worthy of particular scrutiny, both involve allegations of judicial misconduct.

In one, a case dealing with the administration’s ban on transgender troops, the Department of Justice’s chief of staff filed an ethics complaint against Judge Anna Reyes: 

"Judge Reyes' misconduct during these proceedings raises serious concerns about her compliance with the Code of Conduct for United States Judges. Her behavior violates Canon 2A's requirement that judges should "act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary" and Canon 3A(3)'s directive that judges should "be patient, dignified, respectful, and courteous." The Comment to Canon 3A(3) specifically notes that "The duty to be respectful includes the responsibility to avoid comment or behavior that could reasonably be interpreted as harassment, prejudice, or bias." Judge Reyes' treatment of DOJ counsel falls short of this standard." "I respectfully request that appropriate action be taken to address these violations and to ensure that future proceedings in this court are conducted with the dignity and impartiality the public has a right to expect. At minimum, this matter warrants further investigation to determine whether these incidents represent a pattern of misconduct that requires more significant remedial measures."

The complaint cites outrageous behavior on the Judge’s part. If true, I can’t imagine some sort of sanctions not being imposed upon her. 

In the second case, Judge John McConnell is being charged with having failed to disclose he had a conflict of interest in a case where he called a halt on the freezing of federal funds. 

A judge who blocked President Trump’s federal spending freeze is Chairman Emeritus of a nonprofit that will continue to receive millions in government funding as a result of his ruling, in an apparent conflict of interest seen as a second cause for the judge’s impeachment.

On Wednesday, Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.) announced articles of impeachment against federal Judge John McConnell on the grounds that he overreached his authority and engaged in partisan activism by blocking Trump’s executive order freezing federal funding while Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) searches for wasteful spending.

“Impeach this pseudo-jurist!!,” Musk responded to Rep. Clyde’s post.

Then, on Sunday, America First Legal Foundation (AFL) reported that Judge McConnell appears to have had a conflict of interest, which he did not disclose, when he ruled on the lawsuit petitioning him to block the spending freeze.

AFL revealed its findings in a thread of posts on Musk’s X.com social media platform:

  • “Judge McConnell has appeared as a Director on Crossroads’ IRS Form 990 every year since he took the federal bench in 2013.”
  • “Judge McConnell appears to be currently serving on the Board of Directors for the non-profit NGO Crossroads Rhode Island.”
  • McConnell was previously the Chair of the Board and is currently listed as Chairman Emeritus.
  • “In the 18 years Judge McConnell has been on the board of Crossroads Rhode Island, it has received over $128 million in government funding.”
  • The nonprofit received $18.6 million in government funding in 2023 -- more than half its total revenue for the year.
  • “Crossroads Rhode Island has already received just under $2.9 million in FY2025 to provide various programs and services to Rhode Island”
  • Rhode Island is one of the plaintiffs Judge McConnell sided with when he ruled against the federal funding freeze.

 Thus, AFL writes, Judge McConnell was legally required to disclose his close ties to Crossroads and was ethically obligated to recuse himself in order to avoid even the appearance of impropriety -- but, he did neither.

As a result of these revelations, AFL is calling on Judge McConnell to immediately vacate his temporary restraining order against the funding freeze and recuse himself from the case.

“If accurate, these are grounds for impeachment of the judge,” Musk replied to AFL’s posts on Monday.

As interesting as this sampling of actions and litigation is, the more significant things, in my opinion, are policy changes, and two caught my eye this week: Policies on domestic energy production and foreign investment in the United States.

For national security reasons as well as economic ones, energy independence is a significant goal, and once again we are working toward that, as opposed to the Obama-Biden policies of stifling domestic energy production of the only non-fantastical sort of energy that matters.

President Trump’s team is dismantling Biden’s anti-energy agenda with surgical precision. Secretary Burgum’s reversal of offshore drilling bans and SecDuffy’s rollback of auto mandates expose how D.C. bureaucrats strangled American energy independence. 

Restarting LNG exports and slashing red tape prove Trump’s commitment to crushing inflation and unleashing domestic production. These moves aren’t just policy shifts -- they’re a declaration of war on the regulatory state that’s been bleeding taxpayers dry. 

America-first energy dominance isn’t a slogan -- it’s the only way to stop globalist elites from selling out our future. 

Among the many Executive Orders the President has signed, his order on foreign investment in the U.S. seems highly significant and, to my knowledge, not widely covered. He will undertake efforts to encourage and make easier foreign investments, even passive investments here, but he would sharply restrict

PRC-affiliated persons from investing in United States technology, critical infrastructure, healthcare, agriculture, energy, raw materials, or other strategic sectors.  My Administration will protect United States farmland and real estate near sensitive facilities.  It will also seek, including in consultation with the Congress, to strengthen CFIUS [Committee on Foreign  Investment in the United States] authority over "greenfield" investments, to restrict foreign adversary access to United States talent and operations in sensitive technologies (especially artificial intelligence), and to expand the remit of “emerging and foundational” technologies addressable by CFIUS.

He would in addition restrict U.S. investment in China:

The United States will also use all necessary legal instruments to further deter United States persons from investing in the PRC’s military-industrial sector.  These may include the imposition of sanctions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) through the blocking of assets or through other actions, including actions pursuant to Executive Order 13959 of November 12, 2020 (Addressing the Threat From Securities Investments That Finance Communist Chinese Military Companies), as amended by Executive Order 13974 of January 13, 2021 (Amending Executive Order 13959 -- Addressing the Threat From Securities Investments That Finance Communist Chinese Military Companies) and Executive Order 14032 of June 3, 2021 (Addressing the Threat From Securities Investments That Finance Certain Companies of the People’s Republic of China), and actions pursuant to Executive Order 14105 of August 9, 2023 (Addressing United States Investments in Certain National Security Technologies and Products in Countries of Concern).  Executive Order 14105 is under review by my Administration, pursuant to the Presidential Memorandum of January 20, 2025 (America First Trade Policy), to examine whether it includes sufficient controls to address national security threats.

All in all, this first month of the new administration is showing a high degree of competence, fashioning its policies and conduct with dispatch and thoughtful care, making it difficult for those wanting to hang on to the old, demonstrably corrupt, wasteful, and even dangerous policies to persist.



Democrats Pick Some Real Winners To Be Their Leadership


Do you remember who the last chair “person” of the Democratic National Committee was? Don’t spend a lot of time on it, you don’t remember Jamie Harrison, nor should you. Be grateful he held the job – the Cabbage Patch doppelganger was just about as worthless as a DNC Chair could be, overseeing the collapse of the party in historic ways. In short, I would’ve picked him to lead the party if I had a vote. The only thing better – for Republicans, anyway – might be the people Democrats picked to lead them next.

Before Democrats switched leaders, I would have preferred they keep Harrison – he was so singularly awful. But I made a mistake: I underestimated the ability of Democrats to fail; to be able to find people worse than what I figured had to be the worst possible.

I was wrong. Just when you thought Democrats had hit bottom, you realize there is no bottom for them to hit.

Their new leader is a white guy named Ken Martin. Where Harrison was a rabid leftist, Martin takes that to an extreme. 

Martin came out of Minnesota, where he was the leader of the Democratic Farmers Labor Party, the DFL, which is how Democrats organized themselves up there, presumably because the old Democrat Party wasn’t radical enough.

Minnesota is in the United States, but it is not really indicative of the United States – they, unlike the country, actually elected Tim Walz, for example. Martin is more in tune with California or Massachusetts than he is where Democrats can’t win elections. 

His strategy? He’s trying to sell meaningless “membership cards” that read “Proud Democrat,” that have all the officialdom of a handwritten certificate of membership in the “He-Man Woman-Haters Club,” which is now doubly funny as Democrats have “evolved” to the point that they have no idea what either of those things are anymore.

But Martin is just one symptom – an inconvenient wart that indicates deeper problems – for the party. They also picked some real winners to be his deputies. 

David Hogg – who’s apparently been using DNC contacts to raise money for his own “non-profit” where he draws a hefty salary – sent out a fundraising email where he bragged, “We helped elect the first openly transgender member of Congress ever, Sarah McBride, even as millions were spent by the GOP on hate-filled, transphobic ads.”

I looked it up. “Sarah,” aka Tim, raised more than $4 million for the House race in Delaware, where John Whalen, the Republican candidate, raised $20,030. Why? Because Delaware is a liberal state known for electing morons. They sent Joe Biden to Washington for decades, and while a case could be made that they did that to get rid of him, it’s unlikely they would tolerate a moron being their voice in DC for that long simply because they didn’t want him or his family around them. Delaware is small, but it’s not that small.

No, those people are leftists and Republicans aren’t going to toss good money after bad trying to win an election where the deck is stacked, and neither would Democrats.

But Democrat voters and supporters don’t know that, an email from someone “famous” in party leadership will tap the wallets of dumb people willing to max out credit cards to fund rich people staying in positions of power so they can further enrich themselves while whining about rich people. I did mention these people are dumb, didn’t I?

Honestly, take a look at the leadership Democrats just elected – nine officers and biographies and that’s it. What kind of organization only lists names and titles with a picture of their leadership? People with nothing to show for their existence, as far as accomplishments goes. More accurately, the party elite don’t want their base to know what these people have done, as it would make the party even less popular than they already are with the American voting public.

If Republicans were able to appoint the people to lead Democrats I’d support every single one of those people. So, thank you, Democrats, we really are very grateful for your help in accomplishing our goals, keep up the great work!  And please keep being obstinate on issues where 70-80 percent of the public is against you. We really appreciate it.



🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Ilhan Omar Goes on Wild Rant, Calls Americans 'Idiots' Who Shouldn't Be 'Allowed' to Have Views


Bonchie  reporting  for  RedState 

Amid already crushing approval ratings for the Democratic Party, Rep. Ilhan Omar joined terror sympathizer Mehdi Hasan on Sunday to fret that Americans are "idiots" who are too "stupid" to be "allowed" to hold their political views. 

As RedState reported, Omar's beleaguered political party recently hit an all-time low in approval, with just 31 percent of voters viewing Democrats in a favorable light. So yeah, I'm sure what you're about to watch is going to do wonders to bring normal people back into the fold.


Democrats Claim They're on the Comeback Trail, but Reality Just Keeps Punching Them in the Face


OMAR: These people are just idiots. I really, you know, I'm at the point where it's become really hard to have an intellectual debate with any of these people because the level of stupidity that they are displaying every single day is frankly embarrassing, not just in Congress, but as Americans, and the fact that these people are allowed to say the most ridiculous things tells you that the dumbing of the United States has arrived because how else do we get a Trump presidency again?

There's no better vote outreach than having a chronically ungrateful, Islamist-supporting Somali refugee (who still pretends her hellish homeland is a moral bastion) call Americans "idiots" because they believe in silly things like borders and government accountability. Surely, only someone who has been accused of marrying their brother to bypass immigration laws has the intellectual heft necessary to rule the masses. You shouldn't even be "allowed to say the most ridiculous things," according to national brain trust Ilhan Omar. 

Do I feel sorry that Democrats are saddled with this person as one of their mouthpieces? Not even a little bit. For years on end, conservative commentators (and just conservatives at large) warned that empowering "the squad" would lead to crushing defeats and put America's left-wing party on ice with those who decide elections. Sure enough, that happened in 2024, perhaps even ahead of schedule. It only took six years for Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Omar, and the rest to burn everything to the ground. That's good work if I've ever seen it. 

Democrats need to understand that there is no path back until enough people on their side jettison these anti-American lunatics. The working class isn't coming back as long as the Ilhan Omar and Elizabeth Warrens of the world, among many others, are setting the tone. 


Democratic Party Is Having a Nervous Breakdown


Americans are tired of being lectured. They are sick of being told whatever the woke de jour of the day is supersedes their daily needs as citizens. Omar is a symptom of a far bigger problem within the Democratic Party, which has grown hopelessly arrogant bathing in its excesses. I'm not sure there's a silent majority ready to change course, either. As far as I can tell, Omar, Ocasio-Cortez, Warren, and the rest of the far-left are the future. The protective bubble they've built, in which anyone who disagrees with them is a racist fascist, does not allow for the dissent needed to right the ship. To which I say, "Good." They deserve every bit of this.



Levin: Democrats created this monstrosity

Fox News host Mark Levin gives his take on how to save the country on ‘Life, Liberty & Levin.
.

NPS Staffers Hang Upside-Down Flag in Yosemite to Protest Firings -- They Don't Get Reaction They Expect


Nick Arama reporting for RedState 

My colleague Streiff wrote about some of the firings in the National Park Service including this fascinating paragraph that he cited from the original Washington Post story. 

At California’s Yosemite National Park, the Trump administration fired the only locksmith on staff on Friday. He was the sole employee with the keys and the institutional knowledge needed to rescue visitors from locked restrooms.

How does any of that make sense? Why do you have only one guy with the keys and what kind of knowledge do you need to be able to open a bathroom door? Instead of being the plaintive appeal perhaps they hoped, it was a glaring example of exactly why things need to be reformed. 

There was another example in Yosemite National Park. Some NPS employees took the time to hang a flag upside down off El Capitan.

In a statement, the group of six who hung the flag said: 

“The purpose of this exercise of free speech is to disrupt without violence and draw attention to the fact that public lands in the United States are under attack,” it reads. “The Department of the Interior issued a series of secretarial orders that position drilling and mining interests as the favored uses of America’s public lands and threaten to scrap existing land protections and conservation measures. Firing 1,000s of staff regardless of position or performance across the nation is the first step in destabilizing the protections in place for these great places.”

They continued: 

“These losses, while deeply personal and impactful, may also be invisible to visitors and the public — we are shining a spotlight on them by putting a distress flag on El Capitan in view of Firefall. Think of it as your public lands on strike.”

There were also pictures of other people protesting the cuts. Notice the signs with that "silence is violence" -- a typical leftist protest expression -- as well as "ACAB" which is "All cops are bastards."

This of course is exactly the wrong approach. The reaction to this on X was largely along the lines of, "Your actions suggest you should have been fired long before now." Some on X asked if any of this was being done on the taxpayer dime, and noted that if it was, the staffers proved they were non-essential. Additionally, aren't they supposed to be protecting the lands, not hanging flags off them to make political statements? 

One might also note that wasn't it the left who attacked such use of the flag when it came to the flag hanging at Justice Samuel Alito's home? 

Now I get that losing a job is not a happy thing. But we're also over $35 trillion in debt and need to get our house in order. We've needed someone to come in with an axe for some time, to care about spending and get things under control. In the private sector, no one has a guaranteed job, but somehow people in the federal government seem to think they do. There are also people who seem to think that the vast unelected bureaucracy gets to tell the duly elected president what to do, rather than the other way around. 

That's not the way our constitutional system works. 



DNI Tulsi Gabbard Discusses Blurred Line Between Liberty and Security


While I do not expect Mrs. Gabbard to be a heroine in defense of liberty, perhaps she will pause government weaponization and privacy destruction for a few years.   In this interview, Gabbard does seem to understand the issues about Big Govt using ‘national security’ as a justification for the elimination of all privacy protection.

Whether she can do anything about it, right before privacy elimination is scheduled to get a lot worse, is an unknown variable. WATCH:



Oh Noes! NYT Columnist Warns People All Over the World Will Die Because Trump Wants to 'Break Things'


Mike Miller reporting for RedState 

Before we get started, let's see a show of hands. Raise your hand if you think it's way past time for public (taxpayer-supported) broadcasting (PBS and NPR) to go the way of the dinosaurs. 

Just as I thought: all hands, enthusiastically raised.  

Is there any doubt? Other than on the left, I mean. As NewsBusters Executive Editor Tim Graham wrote on Thursday in a column titled "NPR Is National Public Relations for the War on Trump":

At the top of every hour, hundreds of taxpayer-subsidized National Public Radio stations in 50 states transmit leftist public relations, badly disguised as news. You can get talking points jammed in your ear on your rush-hour commute.

Nobody is allowed to question the concept of “systemic racism” on NPR. They’re deeply invested in that ideology. It’s why NPR favors describing race riots against cops as “rebellions.”

Left-wing media outlets wage war on Trump’s takedown of “diversity, equity and inclusion” campaigns, which are horribly named. The left doesn’t want any diversity or inclusion that allows any dissenting space for their opponents, and “equity” is a code word for discrimination in favor of the “marginalized” groups.

The half of the country that voted for Trump shouldn’t have to support this clearly hostile radio network with our tax dollars. Lambda Legal and all the other leftists should pony up for NPR’s supine press releases, since NPR’s “newscasts” aren’t diverse or inclusive enough for conservatives. 

In addition, the ever-witty Louisiana Republic Sen. Johny Kennedy put it this way on Thursday (emphasis, mine):

President Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency is looking for fat to trim. As far as I’m concerned, this gravy train – this gravy train with biscuit wheels called the Corporation for Public Broadcasting – is the perfect example of a project the American people no longer need and should not fund.

I’m all for this, if that’s what these outlets want to do. But, I’m not for taking $500 million every single year and giving it to these stations (CPB) to the exclusion of everybody else. That’s immoral.

This takes us to the latest example of why U.S. taxpayers should, in effect, stand up en masse and scream: "We're mad as hell! And we're not going to take it anymore!"

New York Times columnist David Brooks is delusionally marketed (lied about) as the conservative half of the "PBS NewsHour" weekly Friday news recap, with Washington Post associate editor and MSNBC host Jonathan Capehart, clearly a left-winger. 

However, as is the case with pretend-conservative Ana Navarro on ABC's ridiculous show, "The View," Brooks proves time and time again that his views are anything but conservative — including his irrational attacks (and lies) against President Donald Trump.

On Friday, Brooks declared — with a straight face, no less — that people of over the world will die because all Trump wants to do is "break things."

Host Geoff Bennett teed up Brooks by reading from one of his recent columns.

And you wrote about this [this] past week in a column, where you said that it's ‘the working-class communities that will continue to languish because Trump ignores their main challenges and focuses instead on culture war distractions,’ that people who voted for change want to see that change.

Brooks eagerly jumped on Bennett's comment like a hungry pig jumping on an acorn, demeaning Trump supporters in his usual smug style:

Yes, the people who voted for Trump had a good reason to. Like, high school-educated people die eight years sooner than college-educated people. High school-educated people, their kids, by sixth grade are four grade levels below college-educated people. They're much more likely to say they're lonely. They're much more likely to live in devastated communities without social capital.

The smug arrogance of Brooks was eclipsed only by the ridiculous generalization of Trump supporters as a whole, which is tantamount to conservatives positing that all Harris voters were illiterate people of color, living in urban areas devastated by drugs and violent crimes. 

Brooks continued, pushing the notion that well-off conservative elitists use (lie to) uneducated, low-information conservatives to gain support.

So, if you had a populist government, they would have policies to address these serious issues. The Trump administration is not leading with that. They really don't have plans for any of this. And when you look at who's in the administration, it's obvious why. The president and Elon Musk are University of Pennsylvania graduates who are billionaires.

Pete Hegseth went to Princeton and Yale. J.D. Vance went to Yale. Stephen Miller went to Duke. These are the highly educated right-wingers. And I have been around these — all these people all my life. I used to be one. And there are two types. There are, one, people who believe in conservative governance.

And then there's the other type. They're just anti-left. They don't have a positive vision for conservative governance. They want to tear down the institutions that they believe the left controls. And so that's what they're doing. That's what Bush — that's what Trump goes after.

With all due respect, Mr. Brooks, that's a complete crock of crap. For example, when did it become mutually exclusive to be "anti-left" and a proponent of "conservative governance"? On the contrary, they go hand-in-hand. 

PBS Waxes Idiotic, Claiming Trump Win Proves the US People's 'Acceptance of Authoritarian Leadership'


As for people dying all over the world because Trump, Brooks waxed ridiculous:

And the problem with that is that the pain is born by the woman in Namibia who's going to die of AIDS, the kid in Ohio who's going to die of cancer because NIH, medical research has been gutted. And so it's — F. Scott Fitzgerald put it well. Rich people are careless. They break things. And I think that's what's happening here.

Genius, huh? 

The Bottom Line

Donald Trump has been back in the White House for just two months. The left is laughably whining about his administration not lowering grocery prices — after ignoring the reality for four miserable years that Bidenomics not only led to stubborn inflation; the Biden-Harris administration did zero to try to bring down consumer prices.

As for the rest of the world, Mr. Brooks, two words: "America First." 



♦️𝐖³𝐏 𝐃𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝

 


W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Welcome to the W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Post whatever you got in the comments section below.

This feature will post every day at 6:30am Mountain time.