Wednesday, February 12, 2025

Want Clean, 'Green' Electricity? New Modular Reactor Project in Tennessee Is the Answer.


By Ward Clark | 5:15 PM on February 12, 2025 in RedState
The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of RedState.com.





I'm fond of the saying "We solve today's problems with tomorrow's technology." While I'm not one to describe Earth's ever-changing climate as a problem, the saying still applies to the carbon emissions that climate scolds are constantly hectoring us about. The emission of CO2 into the atmosphere from electrical generation by coal, oil, or natural gas will one day be reduced, but not because of the ear-piercing shrieks of those scolds. It will be reduced by the increasing adoption of cleaner, more efficient, higher energy-density technology.

Solar, wind, and other "renewable" sources are not what I'm talking about. Despite what climate scolds would have us believe, they are not more efficient, they are far less energy-dense, and when you factor in the extraction and production of solar panels and windmills, they aren't even necessarily cleaner. 

I'm speaking, of course, of nuclear power, and now we see that a new project in Tennessee is taking things to the next level, with the first new, small modular reactor (SMR).

Gov. Bill Lee left no doubt he wants Tennessee to be the No. 1 state in nuclear energy innovation when he proposed an additional $92.6 million state investment to boost the sector.

The centerpiece of the proposed spending is a $50 million investment in the Tennessee Valley Authority's project to build the nation's first commercial small modular reactor at the Clinch River Site in Oak Ridge, Lee announced in his seventh State of the State address Feb. 10.

New nuclear development is led by Republican states, and Tennessee can expect the support of the Trump administration in the effort, Lee said. The sector is particularly valuable as a generator of high-paying jobs for the state, though it also made TVA a leader in decarbonization.

"We've now laid the groundwork. We have a willing partner in the White House. Now is the time to develop the Clinch River site and build the first small modular reactor in the nation on Tennessee soil," Lee said, to a standing ovation by state legislators.

"A willing partner in the White House" shouldn't be key; the Constitution doesn't contain any such enumerated power for the executive branch or Congress. But we are forced to deal with things as they are, which isn't always as they should be - and there's no doubt President Trump is energy-sector-friendly, far more so than his predecessor.

Now, as far as any involvement by the states, that's a different story. But this case, this new SMR, is being taken up by private companies, the state of Tennessee - and the federal Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA).

TVA, with private utilities and the state of Tennessee, wants to provide a model of public-private partnerships as it builds small modular reactors at the Clinch River Site. A team led by TVA applied for an $800 million Department of Energy grant in January to support the development of GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy's BWRX-300 design.

If the project is successful, it could make the U.S. design more attractive to international partners.

A key to competing with the state-owned nuclear programs of China, Russia and U.S. allies will be creating these kinds of public-private partnerships, said Jennifer Gordon, director of the nuclear energy policy initiative at the Atlantic Council, an international affairs think tank.

"There are a lot of ingredients here that will lead to perhaps Tennessee being the first mover," Gordon said in a lecture at the Baker School of Public Policy and Public Affairs at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville on Feb. 10.

"You have Oak Ridge, so everybody here knows what nuclear energy is, and I think people are not afraid of it in the same way that they might be in someplace like Hawaii."

This could not only solve a lot of issues with the United States' aging electrical grid by decentralizing it and modernizing it, but it might also create international opportunities for the companies producing the SMRs. These could be not only American game-changers but world game-changers; imagine a group of small African villages, or a small town in Siberia, or a small native village in Alaska, powered (if at all) by diesel generators, long-distance power lines, or other shaky and interruptible sources, but instead by a local SMR - clean, reliable, minimal maintenance.


See RelatedClean Energy: Two New 'Microreactor' Designs Could Be Game Changers

Climate Scold Claims on Nuclear v. Wind/Solar: The Math Doesn't Add Up


So, let the climate scolds scold. Their opposition to nuclear power has revealed who they really are; they aren't interested in Earth's climate, and they aren't interested in the temperature range at which the planet's thermostat is set. They oppose nuclear power not because it's not "green" - it's greener than many of the scold's preferred alternatives. They oppose nuclear power because abundant, reliable, cheap energy is the backbone of our modern, high-tech, free society.

It's that modern society they oppose; not for themselves, of course, but for the rest of us. In this, they are arrogant elitists, with sentiments much like that old (apocryphal) quote attributed to the Duke of Wellington, who supposedly said that he opposed passenger trains - then, also a new technology - claiming they would breed unrest and disorder by "allowing the lower orders to travel too freely about."

We solve today's problems with tomorrow's technology. Small modular reactors are about to be tomorrow's technology today. The climate scolds can't stop it.

Photo: AP Photo/Pat Sullivan

https://redstate.com/wardclark/2025/02/12/want-clean-green-electricity-nuclear-power-is-the-answer-n2185510


Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage


Breathless in America



I am breathless, humbled and excited -- Christmas morning excited. I’ve been around for a long time, and I’ve paid attention to politics ever since Eisenhower, but I’ve never seen anything like Trump’s opening gambit. I had no idea any human being could maintain the pace The Donald is sustaining and still look like he’s having fun. And I didn’t know how much fun it would be to watch the leftists whine -- is there such a thing as too much schadenfreude?

I’m in a state of delighted, yet humbled shock, humbled because I had become accustomed to the turtle-like lumbering of government that I gave no thought to the possibility such a blitzkrieg could ever happen. This is the first lesson I’ve learned from Trump:

Lesson #1One can be both realistic and optimistic at the same time. There’s nothing pie-in-the-sky about our president; he isn’t a dreamer absently wishing for success. He’s doing the work -- he’s been doing the work for eight years. It’s obvious now that he wasn’t sulking while Old Joe was napping in the Oval Office. Trump’s been planning. He’s been rehearsing. Those EOs were all ready and waiting. He’d already chosen his cabinet -- and a better lot could only have been assembled with much effort and divine guidance. Trump is loaded for bear, but he’s confident he can charm that bear into submission.

Lesson #2:  There is no box. It’s not that we must look outside the box -- that implies that the limitations are real. Evidently, they aren’t. Greenland?! What? Gaza? Where did that come from? Panama had scarcely been mentioned, and Rubio has already made progress. And I thought we had so many problems here that I never would have thought to take on yet more. I must swear off the negativity. Canada too?! Wow.

Lesson #3Have no fear. I realize that I had been nervous about the Left’s reaction to the deportations. Yes, they’ve done a little marching around, but they merely look puny and silly. Their congressmen look stuttery and scared. As they should. Terrible things have happened on their watch -- things that have enriched them and lined the pockets of their friends and relatives and hurt millions. So why were Republicans worried about offending the Left? Why were we scared? Homan has just reported that crossings of illegals at the southern border is down 93%. South American governments have agreed to absorb many of those we’re deporting. Gitmo is opening to house the worst of the illegals. We’re only two weeks in. The Bible tells us hundreds of times not to be afraid. Look what can be accomplished when one refuses to fall into that pit. Trump has every right to be afraid; they’ve tried to do such evil things to him, yet he doesn’t even flinch. When will I learn?

Lesson #4 augments #3:  Courage saves energy and mental space for actual accomplishment. Courage is not failing to recognize danger. It is responding to danger with positive efforts to defang the threats. Our burgeoning national debt is just such a monster. It keeps growing and growing. Enter Elon and his band of merry hackers. It’s no wonder our debt has ballooned -- we’re being burgled with every breath we take. We’re also paying millions of people who “work” from home doing jobs that don’t need doing and often doing those poorly. Already, with a single ultimatum from the Oval Office, tens of thousands have decided to seek other employment. Pardon me while I dance a little jig. I can already feel the burden of that debt lifting.

Not only that, but we’ve been coaxed into fearing AI and yet here’s Elon & Co. using AI to find and eradicate the thievery that has nearly killed this country. Allow me to restate Lesson #3 -- no fear.

Lesson #5 just amazes me: If you have faith, you can have fun.  Things have looked grim for America ever since 9/11 and I grew up thinking that cleaning up a mess was miserable work -- even though it isn’t, necessarily. I have, regardless of that attitude, often found joy in cleaning out a closet or vacuuming my car. I do realize the nonstop effort going into all the fumigating, sanitizing, and renovating that’s happening in Washington must be exhausting, but those doing it are evincing such joy that it’s energizing and contagious. Trump gathering all those young girls around him to celebrate giving their sports back to them. What fun he was having (and he didn’t sniff any of them). Bondi issuing her edicts and warnings -- grinning all the time. Rubio and Hegseth and Homan jetting around merrily checking things off their lists as if they were just daily chores. Noem wearing her cowboy hat and riding her horse along the border, surveying her domain.  May the Lord protect them all and bless them mightily.

This entire Arthurian round table believe in what they are doing, believe in the man who leads them, and believe in the purpose and power of God -- however they perceive Him. Of course they’re having fun -- they are winning. They know the American people stand behind them and Trump himself has said often that he knows he has God behind him -- he has that ear to remind him.

Lesson #6 has to do with truth: Truth first. Let pleasantness and honesty replace diplomatic groveling. It’s not that I never valued truth before. I have, as a high school and college instructor, often found myself in situations where I had to tell a student, or his horrified parents, a difficult truth, but in the last couple of decades truth has had to take a back seat to leftist illusions (We each have our own truth, we’re told.) Truth just got tucked away in the attic along with grandma’s doilies and old Boy Scout uniforms. We got accustomed to being lied to by people who knew that we knew that they knew that they were lying that we’ve gone numb. Suddenly we’re dealing with a new Washington that values truth (and therefore efficiency) far more than tact, more than power. We have a president who doesn’t need a teleprompter to answer press questions because often his answer is a simple and cheerful “Yes,” or “No.” No frills. No fuss. Time is short. Let’s git 'er done. Besides, God is truth, so let’s find it and abide by it. And here we are with a government that believes that. Wow.

Lastly -- Lesson #7God answers prayer -- in ways we rarely expect or imagine. I’ve spent the last 50 years of my life enjoying the surprise of His responses to my petitions. These responses have often been funny (God has quite a sense of humor.) or astonishing and always wonderful, but I’ve never seen anything as amazing as these last few weeks. I know that millions and millions of us have been on our knees praying for our country, knowing that divine intervention is necessary. We have been praying for God to raise up leaders who can fix all this -- enter Trump -- not quite what everyone envisioned, but here he is and he’s doing it. We’ve been praying to reach our fellow Americans with the truth. Enter the social media and the dissolution of fake news. We have prayed for Israel and now America can stand boldly beside her. I have never been more thrilled with God’s answers than I am now.

Sometimes it seems like God is not answering, but His timing is always perfect. Trump needed those four years of the empty Biden “presidency’ to get prepared to swoop in and rescue this great nation. I know I needed those four awful years to learn to choose not to fear, not to be angry, to leave it all up to God. What wonderful fun it is to see Him fulfill our faith in Him. I’m breathless.



X22, And we Know, and more- Feb 12

 



A United America Is Democrats’ Undoing


Of all the things I loathe about the Democrat party, its celebration of victimhood takes the cake.  As is true of all political parties infected with virulent Marxism, it does not seek to help those truly in need.  It does the opposite.  It seeks out people who might never have seen themselves as victims and convinces them otherwise.  It is a party whose growth in membership is directly proportional to Democrats’ capacity to convert Americans into victims.  

Once a person understands Democrats’ pathological need to harvest new victims, it becomes obvious that they are not in the business of solving problems.  Fixing anything in society only reduces the number of future Democrats.  By celebrating victimhood, Democrats are committed to making things worse today than they were yesterday and even worse tomorrow than they are today.  Their growth model depends upon perpetual misery.

Americans saw this self-destructive phenomenon play out during Obama’s presidency.  Before the 2008 election, race relations between black and white Americans had steadily improved since the ’60s.  Racism was widely rejected as a repugnant practice of the past.  In fact, discrimination based upon the color of a person’s skin had become so offensive that courts were dismantling affirmative action programs that explicitly prioritized race over merit.  A lot of Republican voters, unhappy with their party’s nomination of Senator John McCain, crossed lines and voted for Barack Obama’s nebulous promise of “hope and change” with the expectation that a post-racial America would take root.

President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder chose another path.  They looked for ways to inflame racial tensions.  They deconstructed a half-century of American racial progress by routinely injecting racial controversy into matters that had nothing to do with skin color.  A black Harvard professor is detained in the Democrat stronghold of Cambridge, Massachusetts?  That’s because all cops are unconsciously racist (even the black ones).  A black male dies in a confrontation with a neighborhood watchman?  That’s because black boys are hunted outside their own communities.  Americans don’t want to pay more for worse health care?  That’s because wealthy white Americans are too selfish to understand the appeal of socialized medicine.  

Whenever policymakers fought Obama administration policy, charges of racism were not so subtly leveled against them.  Instead of finally terminating affirmative action programs and other race-based discrimination, Obama and Holder reinvigorated an otherwise dying system of racial preferences and rebranded discrimination as a “virtue” under the umbrella of the Marxist tripe we know now as “diversity, inclusion, and equity.”  When Obama was elected, race relations inside the United States had never been better.  After eight years of an Obama-Holder strategy to make every policy dispute a racial dispute, race relations had severely deteriorated.  There is perhaps no better example of how backward Democrats’ notion of “progress” truly is.

Setting aside the tangible social harm that Obama and Holder inflicted upon Americans, it is not difficult to understand why they chose division over unity.  Had President Obama framed his election victory as vivid proof that Martin Luther King, Jr.’s dream was reality — proof, in other words, that the content of an American’s character matters much more than the color of that American’s skin — a generational struggle against racial prejudice would have been largely resolved.  Had Obama declared victory over racism, he would have become a transformational figure in American history.  But Democrats are not in the business of solving problems.  Solving problems diminishes the supply of potential victims.  And Democrats’ political success depends upon an ever-growing class of self-identifying victims.  

When seen from this perspective, it is easy to understand how cancerous the Democrats’ governing philosophy is.  Unity — or the cultivation of a common national identity and purpose — is antithetical to Democrats’ Marxist directive to rally the “oppressed” against their “oppressors.”  By design, Democrats cultivate grievance and conflict.  They isolate subsets of American society, convince those subsets that they are victims, and cynically exploit Americans’ shared desire to seek justice for the oppressed.  For Democrats, whether some isolated group has actually been treated unfairly or unjustly is irrelevant.  They stir social passions by maximizing perceived insults felt from real or imagined grievances.  Then they feed on those passions to create explosive political movements capable of transforming imaginary victimhood into real political power.

Since the nineteenth century, Marxism has tried to cultivate grievance among a majority of blue-collar workers, but America’s working class has stubbornly resisted.  However bad working conditions might have been in the United States since its inception, the country long maintained the highest rate of intergenerational social mobility in the world.  The children of indentured servants became farmers.  The children of farmers became skilled tradesmen.  The children of skilled tradesmen became entrepreneurs.  The children of entrepreneurs became lawyers, bankers, and even politicians.  

In other words, for most of America’s history, the United States has been a “land of opportunity” unburdened by traditional strictures of social caste.  Marxists found it difficult to create a class revolution when American workers were too busy making money and buying land.  Coincidentally or not, intergenerational social mobility in the United States declined only after the rise of the Federal Reserve central banking system, the implementation of broadly enforced income taxes, growing encumbrances upon private property, and the rapid expansion of the twentieth-century regulatory state.

In the absence of a politically potent class conflict in America, Marxists turned to another unique characteristic of the United States: its ability to attract workers from all over the world.  For four hundred years, immigrants from distinct cultures and speaking different languages have arrived on America’s shores, and within a single generation, those immigrants have blended into America’s vibrant society.  America’s ability to fuse separate peoples into a common culture gave it the enviable reputation of being a “melting pot” — a land that could take quarrelsome strangers and bind them into an alloy of unusual strength.  

American Marxists, having found insufficient power in class conflict, have spent the last century and a half trying to deconstruct this “melting pot.”  Common national identity and purpose forestall Democrats’ Marxist impulse to cultivate grievance and conflict.  That’s why, in recent decades, they have explicitly rejected any virtuous connotation of America’s historic “melting pot” and embraced pluralistic societies living inside and among each other.  What they champion as “multiculturalism” and “diversity” is really a malicious compulsion to turn constituent groups against one another.  Perceived victimhood cannot flourish in societies that value national unity.  Victimhood requires a steady supply of unfounded outrage and fake oppression.  This unhealthy addiction is the source of preposterous Democrat claims that racial minorities in the United States are today treated worse than antebellum slaves. 

Why is the Democrat party so hostile to President Trump and his “Make America Great Again” agenda?  The simplest answer is right there in his famous political slogan.  He is interested in lifting all of America — and not just some constituent part of it.  

Calling MAGA a “political slogan,” though, hides its real threat to Democrats.  In truth, it is President Trump’s clarion call to the American people: let us get our hands dirty, America.  Let us build and innovate and bring prosperity back to our towns.  Let us dream and turn our dreams into reality.  Let us remember that we are the descendants of revolutionaries who fought for freedom, explorers and adventurers who tamed a continent, and tough and gritty settlers whose courage and resilience fashioned the greatest of nations.  Let us fight when necessary and make peace when possible.  Let us resist all those who insist we are in decline.  Let us accomplish so much so quickly that future generations have no choice but to call this the beginning of America’s “Golden Age.”  

MAGA rejects the pessimistic worldview of perpetual victims.  And a united America is Democrats’ undoing.



Democrats Are Getting Tired of All the Winning


It’s exhausting how exhausted the Democrats are from almost a month of non-stop losing. They’ve got nothing new. They’ve got no good moves. Their malicious compliance is petering out; their litigation strategy may get some fleeting wins in the district courts but are certain to lose when appealed. What’s left is rhetoric. They’re reopening up the whiny playbook from 2016 and running the old-school plays without regard to the fact that Donald Trump and the Trump 2.0 administration are playing an entirely different game. This time, we are going for the throat. We are going for their cash flow. It’s existential, baby, and they’ve got almost nothing left that they can use to fight back.

Unlike us, Democrats are getting tired of all Trump’s winning.

Elon Musk is digging into the crime scene, but he’s not the only one. Remember, Saul Alinsky taught that you personalize the enemy, and the personalized enemy du jour is Elon Musk. But that’s OK because the world’s richest and, arguably, smartest man is probably the least vulnerable man on Earth to this kind of personalized attack. They can turn the entire regime media on him all day and all night, but at the end of the day, he still owns Twitter and has about a quarter of a trillion dollars to play with. It’s not just that he doesn’t care. It’s that he doesn’t have to. He wouldn’t even notice they were attacking him if he didn’t choose to.

What do they have left in their quiver? The usual attack genres. One of my favorites is another Alinsky tactic – try to use our principles against us. Well, we’ve learned something about principles – we’ve learned to reject them as unequivocal constraints upon our self-defense. After all, what good are principles if observing them makes you a slave?

There’s also the perennial “You’re a bad Christian if you don’t submit to all the socialist nonsense I’m pushing” line of attack. Sometimes it comes from pseudo-Christians, leftists whose real religion is leftism and who wear the robes of the church as a skinsuit. That bizarrely butch Episcopalian woman who lectured Trump and Vance at the National Cathedral is the archetype. One look at her and you know why people are walking (sprinting) away from the mainline churches – who wants to be hectored by that prog harpy every Sunday? The other kind is the smug atheist who hates Christians but believes he can somehow leverage Christianity to compel us to do as he commands. It’s funny that they expect us to accept that our Savior is some sandal-wearing socialist in favor of open borders and castrating little boys to comply with the delusions of their Munchhausen mommies. The pseudo-Christians try to leverage their alleged theological education, while the atheists try to leverage their secular education to instruct us in these heresies. But they can only do that for so long before we stop listening, and that time is over. The liberal churches are empty, and the pinko atheists can go pound sand.

Another genre is arguments to the effect that we ought to be talking about something else instead of what we are talking about. We found that the left has been using the entire United States as a giant tax farm through the vehicle of USAID, and that’s pretty hard to defend on its own terms. Outside of a faculty lounge or Twitter, you’re not going to find a lot of people who think that working folks ought to have their money forcibly extracted to subsidize an Ecuadorian transgender mime troupe. So, they attempt to distract us by pointing out something else they claim we should be looking at instead of what we are looking at. “Oh yeah, well, why aren’t you talking about X instead of Y?” The proper response, and the one they’re getting, is to just ignore them. We don’t have to explain anything to them. In fact, getting us to explain is the point because that takes our eye off the ball. We’ve learned to ignore them, but they can still amuse us with their puny attempts to confuse and baffle us.

Another favorite is the rationalization of outrage. The United States government has given $8 million to Politico, a leftist news outlet that covers the United States government. Normal people understand that that’s a bad thing, something that should happen. But wait – there’s an explanation! You see, the government is not just giving them the money; the government is buying something. That means it’s OK. Except we’re not stupid. This kind of payola, where some overpriced item gets purchased for the over price, is simply a way to launder money. Apparently, we’re supposed to believe that Politico Pro, a $10,000-a-year subscription service, is so valuable that the federal government needs a multitude of such subscriptions or the government can’t function. The attractiveness of the idea of the government not being able to function aside, one wonders how our government managed to get along for centuries and, in fact, metastasized to its huge, bloated, Vindman-like bulk without the benefit of a multitude of ten grand payments to a leftist mouthpiece. Well, we’re not really wondering. We know the score, and so do the people crying about Elon Musk exposing it – that’s precisely why they are crying about it.

Another flex is that the waste Elon Musk is finding is so minuscule that it’s not worth spending time on. Of course, they’re simultaneously arguing that stopping these minuscule payments is going to trigger an apocalypse around the world, and all of Africa is going to get AIDS and no Third World child will ever eat again if we don’t keep promiscuously pouring money down this rat hole. As a lawyer, I have to admire their Janus-like ability to assert two utterly contrary arguments within the same argument and to do it without hesitation or shame. As an American citizen, I’m tired of all this crap.

There’s another genre where they’re reaching the bottom of the barrel and trying to scrape through it in which they raise the alarm that Elon Musk, a special government employee, will have access to our Social Security numbers and such. Yeah, it’d be pretty terrible if the government had access to our government-issued information. There’s a real risk that Elon Musk is going to open a Discover card account in your name and rack up charges until it exceeds its $7500 line of credit.

With these people, it’s always a question of whether they are stupid or whether they think the people they are talking to are stupid. After all, what they’re saying is stupid, and somebody has to be stupid in the conversation or it’s all pointless. But I’m beginning to believe that there might be a third possibility. There’s the possibility that they’re not even trying anymore. There’s the possibility that they don’t believe it, and they know that the people they’re saying it to won’t believe it, but they’ve got to say something to uphold the fantasy that they’re actively resisting Donald Trump and, thereby, the will of the American people who elected him. Maybe they are so exhausted by our relentless campaign to take our country back that they’re not even trying anymore. So, the answer is that they are stupid, or their supporters are stupid, and/or they are just out of ideas other than stupid ones – well, all the pieces fit. The Democrats truly are tired of all our winning.



🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


JD Vance Delivers Keynote Address at European AI Summit in Paris


If you have followed the arc of Tech, Peter Thiel recruiting JD Vance, the creation of Palantir, the funding of Vance’s senatorial run, and eventually the roadmap to connect Vance to Trump, this is a video speech you absolutely must not miss. JD Vance was sent to the AI Summit for a reason.

JD Vance talks at the AI summit in Paris, France, about his core mission, his core purpose inside current political influence. This is the very origin of his legacy, unfolding in real time. Vice-President JD Vance talks about Artificial Intelligence, the future and the Trump administration position.

Vice President JD Vance warned European leaders against heavily regulating U.S. tech companies and said excessive efforts by the European Union to regulate artificial intelligence could stymie its growth, during an AI summit in Paris Tuesday that marks his first foreign trip since taking office. WATCH:



Do you feel more or less confident about the future, having watched these remarks?



Portrait of a femme fatale who brought down China's elite

 A respected magazine has provided the most detailed picture yet of the complex life of a billionaire businesswoman responsible for the downfall of some China's most powerful figures in a sex-and-corruption saga that has gripped the nation.

Li Wei slept with up to 15 top business and party figures before turning on some of them in a series of corruption cases to save herself from a long prison sentence, according to Caijing business magazine. Her contacts book contained some of the most powerful men in the land, as she used her beauty to break into the secretive bastion of powerful men that tightly control China, according to the magazine.

Ms Li was jailed on tax fraud charges in 2006 but was released early this year and now lives in Hong Kong. The magazine alleges that she was released early because her diary contains fresh allegations of "immoral relationships" with "high-ranking officials", which is code for officials at the most senior levels in the land.

Ms Li reportedly created a vast network of protection and favour in the provinces in Yunnan, Guangdong, Beijing and Qingdao to build a multibillion-pound business empire in return for sexual favours. As her corrupt protectors went to jail, she turned herself in and was given a lenient jail term.

"You cannot invest all your resources and opportunities into one person, you have to construct a huge relationship net, like an umbrella," Ms Li was quoted as saying by Chinese media. Her empire at its peak consisted of more than 20 companies in Beijing, Qingdao, Shenzhen, Hong Kong and overseas, in industries including tobacco, real estate and advertising. She owned 183 petrol stations in Beijing.

A great friend of Wang Yi, vice-chairman of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, her shares and bonds did very well. Her assets were at one point worth about £1bn.

Born in Vietnam in 1963 of mixed French-Vietnamese parentage, she moved at the age of seven with her father to Yunnan province in search of a better life. She sold tobacco as a youngster, but her ability to manipulate the arcane system of building connections, combined with her considerable allure, transformed her into a formidable power broker.

Zheng Shaodong, the former chief investigations officer at the Ministry of Public Security in Guangdong province, got her a residence permit. After earning legitimate resident status, she married a top official at the local tobacco bureau.

Through her husband, Ms Li managed to gain access to former Yunnan governor Li Jiating, who became her lover. She helped him get resident status for his son in Hong Kong in exchange for tobacco export quotas. The governor narrowly escaped the death sentence in 2003 for taking more than £19m in bribes.

Ms Li became involved with Du Shicheng, the former party secretary of the rich city of Qingdao in Shandong province. Through her relationship with Mr Du, she secured top-notch real estate in Qingdao, a coastal city that was once a German protectorate, and soon became one of the city's biggest property developers.

Mr Du introduced her to his good friend, Chen Tonghai, the chairman of Sinopec, China's oil and gas giant. He too became Ms Li's lover, and he gave her gifts of millions of shares in companies owned by Sinopec.

Mr Du's revelations about his friend's corrupt activities precipitated Mr Chen's downfall. He was sentenced to death with a two-year reprieve. Ms Li's testimony was central to the conviction of many of the officials she entertained in her boudoir.

Some of her former lovers are serving time in Beijing's Qincheng high-security prison, which primarily houses political prisoners but has been used for corrupt cadres.

Aware that corruption could undermine the rule of the Communist Party, the leadership has organised several high-profile campaigns in the last few years to try to stamp out graft.

According to a survey by state prosecutors, more than 90 per cent of the country's senior officials punished on serious graft charges in the past five years have kept mistresses.

The victims

*Chen Tonghai

Ex-chairman of China's second-largest oil company, Sinopec, given a suspended death penalty in 2009 for taking 196m yuan (£17.5m) in bribes.

*Li Jiating

Ex-governor of Yunnan province, sentenced to death for corruption in 2003. Thought to be in Qincheng Prison, Beijing.

*Liu Zhihua

The ex-vice-mayor of Beijing, who supervised preparations for the 2008 Olympics, was sentenced to death in 2008 for taking $1.45m in bribes. His sentence may be commuted to life imprisonment.

*Zheng Shaodong

Ex-head of China's Economic Criminal Investigation Bureau received a suspended death sentence for corruption.

*Huang Songyou

The ex-deputy head of the Supreme Court is currently serving a life sentence for embezzlement and receiving bribes worth £500,000.

https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/asia/portrait-of-a-femme-fatale-who-brought-down-chinas-elite-2219296.html

Related:

WASHINGTON — She calls herself “Chinaloa.” Born in Guangdong Province in 1986, her parents labored in a factory 400 kilometers from home, unable to share in the miracle of China’s economic rise. Seeking a better future, they secured labor visas and migrated to Mexico in late 2000, taking jobs in a relative’s restaurant. Remarkably, by the next decade, their daughter, Qiyun “Chinaloa” Chen, had risen to the ranks of elite money brokers, facilitating cocaine and fentanyl operations across the Western Hemisphere.

For enemies and allies alike—Chinaloa—the moniker she used in encrypted WeChat texts—fuses two worlds: Chinese money laundering and the narco-terror of Mexico’s Sinaloa and Jalisco Nueva Generación Cartels. Few outside elite law enforcement circles, however, understand that U.S. intelligence views Chinese gangsters with suspected Communist Party affiliations as intrinsically connected to the brutal Mexican cartels in counter-narcotics investigations, ultimately posing greater threats to American borders and sovereignty.

Yet the story of “Chinaloa” Chen, a Chinese migrant who brought together 14K Triad money launderers and a feared matriarch of Sinaloa nicknamed the “Iron Lady,” sits squarely at the center of what President Donald Trump now calls an unprecedented crackdown on drug trafficking and illegal migration. Within hours of returning to the Oval Office, Trump signed a series of executive orders that promise to designate certain cartels and criminal groups as terrorists, invoke the Alien Enemies Act to remove them, and mobilize the U.S. military for reinforced border security. His new hard line aims to eradicate cartel influence in fentanyl, human trafficking, illegal immigration, and border threats, imposing punitive measures on nations Trump accuses of complicity—China, Mexico, Canada, Panama, and beyond.

With timing that was conspicuous, on Jan. 21, the day after Trump confirmed plans to hit Canada with a 25 percent tariff for failing to stem fentanyl flows into the U.S., Toronto police disclosed new details on the largest-ever cocaine bust in the city’s history. Authorities announced the seizure of 835 kilograms of cocaine worth $83 million, tied to the Cártel de Jalisco Nueva Generación. The cartel, an outlier for extreme violence even among rival Mexican narcos, has reportedly produced millions of doses of deadly fentanyl and smuggled them into the United States, often disguised to look like Xanax, Percocet, or oxycodone. Still, most Canadians remain largely unaware of the Chinese financial underpinnings of a growing infiltration of Mexican crime led by the Sinaloa and Jalisco cartels in Vancouver, Toronto, and Montreal for the past 15 years.

U.S. experts including David Asher, a top State Department investigator in Trump’s first administration, say that Triad money brokers at or above Chinaloa’s level command Western hemisphere money laundering for the Mexican cartels from Vancouver and Toronto.

An investigation by The Bureau into freshly unsealed indictments in the case of Chinaloa Chen, aka “Gucci,” aka “La China”—along with interviews with elite investigators—explains how she introduced senior 14K gangsters to top Sinaloa operators like Marisela “Iron Lady” Flores-Torruco. These findings shed new light on the war that Trump has started and on Canada and Mexico’s alleged complicity in China’s fentanyl trade.

DEA agents discovered, after seizing Chen’s phones and reading her WeChat texts, that she, her husband, Guatemala City casino owner Xizhi Li, and his associate Tao Liu had formed an elite network operating in a rarefied sphere of wealth and influence. They mingled with politicians and seemingly legitimate businessmen across North and Latin America, while orchestrating financial logistics to ship hundreds of tons of narcotics into the United States, collect drug-sale proceeds in cities across America, and launder the money through currency conversions and international trade spanning China, Mexico, the United States, and Canada.

“We found Chinese networks picking up drug money in over 22 states. They’d fly one-way to places like Georgia or Illinois, pick up cash, and drive it back to New York or the West Coast,” a U.S. expert with direct knowledge of investigations into Chinaloa Chen and Xizhi Li told The Bureau in a recent interview.

“Most people don’t realize that Chinese organized crime has been upstream in the drug trade for decades,” they said. “The money brokers based in Mexico City—that’s the directors of actual U.S.-based money brokers, at the higher level. There was a lady by the name of ‘Chinaloa’—a great example of a higher-level money broker who worked for the Sinaloa Cartel and CJNG, and her husband was Triad and a high-level guy. Just like the guy (Tao Liu) that came into New York—these are the players who would do the wine-and-dining. They’re several nodes above the street-level distribution.”

According to U.S. court filings, Chen pleaded guilty on November 8, 2017, to one count of Conspiracy to Launder Monetary Instruments. While awaiting sentencing, she agreed to fully cooperate. The Agreed Statement of Facts describes how she and the Flores-Torruco DTO moved hundreds of kilograms of cocaine from Colombia through Panama and into Mexico, relying on Chen to ensure U.S. dollars were immediately available for new shipments—then launder the proceeds from sales in American cities back to Mexico. She kept a percentage of every transaction as compensation.

“Her role was to facilitate the availability of large sums of cash, often in United States Dollars, for the DTO to purchase new shipments of cocaine,” the filings say. “Chen communicated directly with Marisela Flores-Torruco about her organization’s financing needs, (and) would then communicate with individuals in the United States, Mexico, Colombia, and elsewhere, who could facilitate the availability of large sums of cash, often in USD.”

The evidence highlights Chen’s elite role as a financial facilitator—and by extension, the involvement of Chinese merchants—in supporting the Sinaloa and Jalisco cartels, according to DEA officials. They express the troubling belief that Chen’s movement of massive funds through Chinese bank accounts, combined with Beijing’s full visibility into her WeChat communications with Li and others, suggests China’s government is not only aware of but complicit in these laundering activities

Chinese Money Broker in Cartels

The Chinese money brokers play a significant role in funding the Sinaloa and Jalisco Cartels by facilitating the laundering of drug proceeds. According to a DEA investigation, these brokers have established a network that processes large amounts of drug money, often with the assistance of Chinese underground banking systems. This network helps cartels move their profits from the United States to Mexico, providing a ready market for U.S. dollars in the U.S. and facilitating the transfer of funds to pay for goods and services needed by the cartels, such as precursor chemicals for fentanyl.

Chinese underground money exchanges in the U.S. assist cartels by providing a way to repatriate profits back to Mexico. Wealthy Chinese nationals who wish to transfer assets to the U.S. but are restricted by Chinese capital flight regulations often use these brokers to move funds. This activity has become a focal point in President Trump’s strategy to combat the fentanyl crisis, which includes advocating for criminal indictments of financial institutions and mass sanctions on Chinese companies and individuals involved in the fentanyl trade.

The involvement of Chinese brokers in the drug trade and money laundering operations has been highlighted in various reports and investigations, indicating a complex web of illegal activities that span across international borders.

Government Retirement Files Ruined After Miners Dig Too Deep And Unearth Balrog

 Government Retirement Files Ruined After Miners Dig Too Deep And Unearth Balrog

U.S.·Feb 12, 2025 · BabylonBee.com
Article Image

BOYERS, PA — The Iron Mountain Federal Records Center has reportedly lost access to all federal retirement files after miners dug too deep and awakened an ancient Balrog.

"The miners dug too greedily and too deep and awakened a great shadow in the Nameless Dark," reported DOGE employee Big Balls.

According to sources, hundreds of civil servants were lost as a great flash like flame brought doom to Iron Mountain. What it was could not be seen. It was like a great shadow wreathed in flame, in the middle of which was a dark form, of bureaucrat-shape, yet greater; and a terror seemed to be in it and go before it.

Emergency services arrived at the scene shortly after the first screams rang out, but there was nothing that could be done. The records facility was sealed off and abandoned, the files now beyond the reach of mortal man.

"The kinds of things we're doing, I think, are very simple and basic," Elon Musk said of the DOGE team and their decision to close the Iron Mountain Federal Records Center. "I just don't think federal employees should have to risk their lives to file paperwork near a balrog."

At publishing time, a federal employee up for retirement entered the long dark of Iron Mountain on a quest to fill out the appropriate paperwork.

https://babylonbee.com/news/government-retirement-files-ruined-after-miners-dig-too-deep-and-unearth-balrog