Sunday, February 2, 2025

Being a Witness to the ‘American Miracle’ That Has Played Out Over the Past 16 Years


On the morning of Donald J. Trump’s second inauguration, the former- and soon-to-be current president, along with his wife Melania, stopped by the White House. Awaiting the Trumps’ arrival were the current residents, Joe Biden and his wife Jill. When Trump first got out of the limousine, before his wife came around from the other side of the car, Biden greeted him with the words, “Welcome home.” In what seemed to be a rare lucid moment for Biden, one got the impression that Joe was expressing the idea that he had been house-sitting—or, some might say, squatting—in the White House for the past four years.

Many Americans were, and still are, extremely upset over the outlandish and unlawful shenanigans that transpired back in the 2020 election that were designed to keep Trump out of power for another four years. The proof of the rigging and stealing of the election was overwhelmingly obvious to many, and not just to the tens of thousands who marched to “Stop the Steal” on January 6, 2021.

Several of those Senators and Representatives inside the Capitol that day, Ted Cruz chief among them, were presenting their case to delay certifying the 2020 presidential election results until tangible evidence of election tampering could be examined. The drama that ensued outside the Capitol and was soon permitted to flow inside and into the inner chambers appears to have been orchestrated to divert America’s (and the world’s) attention away from the steal—and the evidence of that steal, to this day, has never been subjected to any official deep-dive.

Even though he was no longer in control of power, Donald Trump spent the four years following the 2020 election enduring incredibly spiteful attacks, all spearheaded by Democrats, the Deep State, the Far Left, and RINOs in his own party. But Trump stood tall, both literally and figuratively. Many have observed that his rising up from the platform in Butler, Pennsylvania, after an assassin’s bullet missed his head by a quarter of an inch, was the moment the former president sealed the deal marking his return to the White House.

Trump’s enemies made him a living legend. And at that moment, he became unbeatable; the election was now “too big to rig.”

God did not just spare Trump’s life by providing a clear-cut miracle; He also revealed how He works throughout history through individual lives. At least two scriptures immediately come to mind:

And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose. (Romans 8:28 NIV)

And...

And who knows but that you have come to your royal position for such a time as this? (Esther 4:14 NIV)

In his inauguration address, President Trump acknowledged God’s hand in sparing his life to “make America great again.”

But why did God wait so long? Couldn’t Trump have brought greatness back to this country by completing back-to-back terms in the White House?

Hindsight, as they say, is always 20/20. However, in 2020, the powers that be had been hampering Trump’s first term and shackling, wherever they could, his plans for success for the country. Trump would have limped into his second term and, as a lame-duck president, been unable to accomplish his noble goals.

In the four years that followed, Joe Biden’s—or, more likely, his handlers’—incompetence overall became all too apparent as they bungled one national or international crisis after another. Add to that the blatant idiocy of the choices to fill administrative roles, including among the many some guy in a dress to head our Health and Human Services Department and another dude more interested in paternity leave than handling our previous supply-chain crisis. It took forty-eight seemingly interminable months for most Americans to begin to awaken from this insidious woke madness.

But awaken we did. And when the sleeping giant wiped the sand from its eyes, it was “mad as hell and not going to take this anymore”—to echo newscaster Howard Beale from that prescient 1976 film, Network.

Some would say that what’s happening now, and with lightning speed, is that Trump is doing a one-eighty on the catastrophe known as “the last four years.” When you get right down to it, however, the Biden Administration was really the continuation of the Obama years.

When Barack Obama beat out Hillary Clinton back in 2008 to become the Democrat party nominee for president, America may have been spared a worse fate than we have today. Consider this: What if Hillary Clinton had been the nominee in 2008 and had gone on to win the presidency?

Most likely, not only would she have served two terms, but the country would have then been primed for an even more seasoned Barack Obama to “make history again” by becoming America’s first black president. Obama would have served two terms—bringing us up to the 2024 election. After a full sixteen-year reign, all the madness and behind-the-scenes control of our elections would have guaranteed that no Republican—not even a fire-breathing real estate tycoon and television celebrity—could have tackled and toppled the Deep State establishment.

But after Obama’s eight years, citizens rethought the idea of voting for the first woman president; maybe that wasn’t so glamorous or earth-shattering of an idea after all. America was ready for a common-sense leader again, not a wishy-washy figurehead.

As a side note, it appears that, at least for now, Barack Obama’s wind and impact have been laid to rest with the events of this past election. But that diminished influence may be short-lived. Can a resurgence be in the works? Jerome R. Corsi covered this potential “sleeping dog” in a previous American Thinker article, which you can read here.

So, here we are.  The past sixteen years are now behind, and what Trump envisions as America's Golden Age is ahead. The clock is ticking... And, regardless, rest assured that everything will work out “for the good of those who love Him and are called according to His purpose.”



And we Know, On the Fringe, and more- Feb 2

 



Boy, Did We Dodge a Bullet


As I watched Vice President J.D. Vance swear in our new Defense Secretary, Pete Hegseth, I couldn’t help but breathe a long sigh of relief.

At last, our military forces will be restored to its full potential to protect this great nation.

If we are looking for further proof that a higher power is watching over us, consider this one question: why haven’t our enemies taken advantage of the fact that for the past four years, America has been at its most vulnerable because the man in charge of that nuclear football has been non compos mentis since he took office? As if that wasn’t bad enough, the man in charge of our Defense Department at the time was missing for a number of days without letting anyone know he was in the hospital.

During the confirmation hearings for Hegseth, RINO Sens. Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski and Mitch McConnell all voted with the Democrats against him, yet they all voted to confirm the AWOL Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin. 

These GOP traitors have the nerve to think they know who would handle our military most efficiently. Well, Austin was in charge when we quit Afghanistan and left billions of equipment to the Taliban.

There is no doubt that the new Secretary of Defense has a history of sexual entanglements that his Democrat interrogators were eager to expose during his confirmation hearings. I would have been more impressed if they concentrated on his plans to restore our military rather than harping on his sex life as we all know that veterans returning from combat missions frequently go through chaotic personal relations in civilian life.

Since watching Hegseth’s swearing in, I  was curious to learn more about this man who had been a Fox News host and author who caught Trump’s attention with his book, The War on Warriors.

Anyone who lived through the Vietnam era will recall that these veterans, including my brother, went through a period of public disdain thanks to the effective war protesters such as Jane Fonda.

Vietnam vets were called 'baby killers' and yes, were spat upon by hippies.

It wasn’t until Ronald Reagan spoke respectfully of our warriors who fought and died in Vietnam, that the scorn for these veterans gradually abated.

It is horrifying to witness what has happened to our military in the last decade with D.E.I proponents savaging it. It is so clear that love of country is the last thing on their minds, but it is the very first motivation for Hegseth’s life.

In an old interview on YouTube, the new Secretary of Defense tells of growing up in a small town where patriotic traditions were so strong, that the idea of dying for one’s country was not a fantasy.

In the last two presidential campaigns, the only donations I made were to the former Navy Seals running for office. Contrast that emotion with Michelle Obama’s 2008 campaign remark: "For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback."

Boohoo, Michelle. Still bitter about her Princeton student experience, and every other slight she perceived as part of a racist America, she couldn’t help this revealing slip.

POTUS Trump recognized the patriotic fervor of Pete Hegseth in his book which outlined the disastrous shift that had sunk into our armed forces. Various book reviewers summarize the War on Warriors in these words: “Hegseth argues that the military has shifted from core values of honor, sacrifice, and merit to a focus on diversity and social justice. He believes this shift undermines military effectiveness and alienates traditional, patriotic recruits. Hegseth calls for a return to traditional military values, warning that the current direction risks weakening America’s defense capabilities.”

That sounds like a perfect plan to heal and restore sanity to all our military forces. Once again, I ask the question why weren’t we ambushed during our most susceptible condition?

President Donald Trump said in his inauguration speech that he believed he was saved by God to save this country. He, of course, was referring to having survived two assassination attempts, and the general consensus is that this is correct even though the word ‘God’ is still anathema to the left. But Trump is not the only president that God may have protected for the interest of our great nation.

I knew very little about our first president, George Washington, other than his involvement in the American Revolution. I was stunned to learn that he fought with the British in the French and Indian War, and it was this experience that led to him becoming  the commander of the rebel forces in the Revolution. In letters he wrote to his brother and mother he said:

By the All-Powerful Dispensations of Providence, I have been protected beyond all human probability or expectation; for I had four bullets through my coat, and two horses shot under me, yet escaped unhurt, although death was leveling my companions on every side of me!

Harold Pease wrote a column in the Independent about the Indian legend of God’s divine protection. Supposedly, a former Indian warrior met Washington and said:

Our rifles were leveled, rifles which, but for you, knew not how to miss – `twas all in vain, a power mightier far than we, shielded you.

He then said this:

There is something bids me speak in the voice of prophecy: Listen! The Great Spirit protects that man and guides his destinies – he will become the chief of nations, and a people yet unborn will hail him as the founder of a mighty empire.

There has never been a wider divide between our two political parties. We have one whose presidential convention members booed when someone said the word 'God.' And the other proudly utters praise and gratitude for His intercession in this great nation’s life.



End of the Empty Suit Era: The Kash Patel Nomination Hearing


The most poignant moment of Kash Patel’s hearing on Thursday, as Trump’s FBI Director nominee, was his response to Senator Welch (D-VT). Having waded through the thoroughly boring Democrat tropes referencing January 6th, and the laboriously repeated question absolutely no one cares about—does Patel believe Trump actually lost the 2020 election?—he deftly exploited a subtle opening in Welch’s line of questioning. He responded with a statement pregnant with common sense, “That’s why I think its time, for the first time in this country’s history, that a public defender be the next director of the FBI, because no one knows more about constitutional due process than PDs.”

For the Democrat party, the ghost of Liz Cheney still haunts their nocturnal fantasies with the siren song of insurrection. In response to the incessant Democrat caterwauling, America simply yawned, preferring the message of Make America Great Again. But, people like Welch just don’t get it. 

Since the directorship of Louis Freeh, FBI directors have been selected from what many brick agents would describe as the “empty suit” club. From Muller, to Comey, to Wray, the director’s  office has been occupied by people drawn from the bureaucratic establishment. All of them known entities with all the right pedigrees, resumes approved by fellow bureaucrats and beholden to the administrative state. The result has been an FBI more oriented toward the interests of the state than the civil liberties of the American people. But, with Patel, we see a distinct departure from that statist culture. 

Kash Patel has a list of credentials that easily qualify him for the office of FBI Director. He served as Chief of Staff to Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller, as Deputy Assistant to President Donald J. Trump, and Senior director for Counterterrorism at the National Security Council, where he played a critical role in eliminating top terrorism leaders and recovering American hostages. He served as Principal Deputy to the Acting Director of National Intelligence. Most famously, Patel was the National Security Advisor to the House Intelligence Committee, and headed the only substantive investigation into the spurious Russiagate matter. He was a DOJ terrorism prosecutor, and started his career as a public defender (PD). Patel holds a law degree from the University College of London (with a certificate in International Law), and a bachelor’s from the University of Richmond.  

Furthermore, Patel has been endorsed by over fifty retired FBI Agents and analysts represented by Reform the Bureau, led by retired FBI Agent Richard Stout. The letter of endorsement, of which I’m a signatory, reads in part, “Never has the FBI faced such an urgent and compelling need for comprehensive reform as it does today. Mr. Patel has proven he possesses the breadth of experience required to address these challenges. His leadership, expertise, and vision make him uniquely qualified to guide the FBI through this pivotal moment. For these reasons, we stand in full support of Kash Patel’s nomination.” During the hearing, Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) entered the letter into the congressional record. 

Beyond the credentials, professional accolades, and endorsements, Patel’s time as a PD may give the clearest indication of what makes him tick. PDs represent some of the most vulnerable people within the justice system. They are criminal defendants without the means of retaining private representation. Quite simply, the job of the PD is to ensure that the criminal defendant’s civil liberties are preserved, that the defendant’s due process rights are enforced, and that America’s jurisprudential maxim is honored—innocent until proven guilty.

Patel will bring the spirit of the noble PD with him, and right wrongs with prudence informed by notions of due process. The scalpel must be employed with a judiciousness in order to assure transparency, accountability, and a restoration of an impartial professionalism at the FBI, without diminishing the necessary functions of national security. Patel’s experience suits him to this task.     

In an age of government weaponization, where Democrat statists have adopted Lavrenity Beria’s slogan, “Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime,” Patel’s provenance as a PD puts him in direct opposition to the sentiments of Stalin’s longest-serving secret police chief. Democrats have found much in common with Beria beyond his infamous slogan. In 1953, he supervised the expansion of the gulags, not unlike the Democrat vendetta against J6 defendants and other political opponents. Later, he was executed by Nikita Khrushchev for treason, a not unreasonable parallel to the political execution just exacted on the Democrat party by the American people.

Patel rose to the challenge of the senatorial gauntlet. He assured Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) that he wouldn’t burn the agency down, but lift up the good men and women of the FBI. Patel promised what America wants most from its premier federal law enforcement agency: accountability, a return to the primacy of the constitution, and letting the good cops be cops. He danced past the silly rhetoric of Democrats desperate to make Russiagate relevant, when we’ve already been “unburdened by what has been.”  

Another pivotal moment in Patel’s hearing arrived when responding to Senator Katie Britt (R-AL). Patel said, “The men and women of the FBI do the most courageous work on God’s green earth…You can say whatever you want about me, bring it on, but you will not denigrate the men and women of the FBI that have saved this country.” In his Wall Street Journal opinion piece published the day before the hearing, Patel said of the diminished FBI he will almost assuredly lead, “We’ve also seen the FBI at its best. Recently in Oklahoma, agents foiled a planned ISIS attack, and in Colleyville, Texas, they courageously neutralized a terrorist holding synagogue congregants hostage. These examples showcase the FBI’s capacity to protect Americans and underscore why restoring public confidence in the bureau is critical.”  

Kash Patel will certainly be the most pivotal FBI Director since J. Edgar Hoover, and will face challenges of a similar magnitude. And, like Hoover, Patel is a force for change.   



🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Zionist Organization Naming Names in Light of Trump’s Executive Order Targeting Terror Sympathizers in America on Visas

 Betar, which describes itself as a ‘loud and proud’ pro-Israel group, sends Trump Administration a list of pro-terror students and faculty.

In light of President Trump’s executive order that paves the way for officials to revoke the visas of international students and faculty members who support foreign terrorist organizations, one Zionist advocacy group is working closely with the new administration to make sure the order gets put to use. 

Betar U.S., an American Zionist organization that traces its origins to Russian author and Zionist leader, Vladimir Jabotinsky, has been compiling a list of names of pro-terror actors on college campuses, along with evidence of their infractions, for months. Now that Mr. Trump signed an executive order that calls for the deportation of foreigners, including students, who express support for designated terrorist groups, the organization is pouncing at the opportunity to hand the administration a list of names on a silver platter. 

“The executive order is just 25 percent of the equation. The other 75 percent is oversight,” Betar’s director of projects, Sloan Rachmuth, tells The New York Sun. The group, living up to its motto of being “loud and proud Zionists” who “fight back” sent the Trump administration, including officials in the Department of Homeland Security, Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, and the Department of Justice, a list of 120 visa-holding students and faculty members who they have documented supporting terrorist groups. 

Meanwhile, Betar is working with government officials who have expressed interest in championing the issue to make sure that their dossier is taken seriously. Such figures include Arkansas Senator, Tom Cotton, New York Representative, Ritchie Torres, and former chair of the Education and Workforce Committee, Virginia Foxx, Ms. Rachmuth tells the Sun. 

The group, however, is careful to distinguish between acts or speech that are pro-terror versus antisemitic. “When I hear statements like ‘globalize the intifada’ or ‘we are Hamas,’ — which have been chanted on the steps on UNC — that crosses into material support for terror,” Ms. Rachmuth notes. “They’re doing the bidding for the Muslim Brotherhood.”

On the other hand, if students are participating in a protest calling for Hillel to be removed, “I don’t think that is support for terror. That’s just antisemitic,” Ms. Rachmuth tells the Sun. The group has people on the ground in 50 cities across the country and all of the evidence, she notes, is “verified on video.”

Universities with a significant number of offending students and faculty? The University of North Carolina and Duke University, Ms. Rachmuth says, noting that they hold high percentages of students on F1 visas and are “feeder schools” for the State Department. The group has also compiled evidence of students and faculty at the University of Michigan, New York University, Cooper Union, and dozens of others. 

The executive order, which was signed by Mr. Trump during his first week in office, is titled “Protecting the United States from Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats.” The document notes that “The United States must ensure that admitted aliens and aliens otherwise already present in the United States do not bear hostile attitudes toward its citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles, and do not advocate for, aid, or support designated foreign terrorists and other threats to our national security.” 

Betar, though, appears to be the only advocacy group taking the executive order as a call to action. “Other groups find it unseemly that we are focusing on getting people who are abusive the hell out of here,” Ms. Rachmuth tells the Sun. “But behind the scenes, I’ve gotten hundreds and hundreds of ‘attaboys.’ I feel like a rockstar.” 

https://www.nysun.com/article/zionist-organization-naming-names-in-light-of-trumps-executive-order-targeting-terror-sympathizers-with-visas


The Media Don’t Want ‘Independence’ In Trump’s Admin They Want Insubordination


When Democrats and the media say they’re concerned about ‘independence’ in Trump’s appointees, they mean they want insubordination.



Neither Democrats nor the Washington-based news media want Donald Trump’s presidency to succeed and one of the most effective ways to ensure it doesn’t is for people to sabotage his administration from within, as was often the case in his first term.

But they don’t explicitly acknowledge that reality. They instead cloak the subversion in nobility by referring to “independent” administration officials or cabinet appointees whom they urge to “exercise independence.”

On Friday’s episode of The New York Times’ “The Daily” podcast, reporter Jonathan Swan said Trump and his closest allies are “scouring the executive branch, looking for any pockets of independence and removing them.” Likewise, during the confirmation hearing for Trump’s pick for attorney general Pam Bondi, Democrat Sen. Chris Coons said, “One of the concerns I’ve raised … is safeguarding the Department of Justice’s independence…”

The point is to frame disobedience to the duly elected president as an act of nobility. When they say “independence,” they don’t mean an enthusiasm for critical thinking and personal experience that could be useful in offering advice to form the president’s thinking. What they mean is insubordination, a readiness to rebuke direction from Trump that will once again derail the agenda he was elected to implement.

Every elected Republican and “career civil servant” (aka government bureaucrat) who did that in Trump 1.0 was turned into a media hero: Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, Alexander Vindman, Miles Taylor (who?!), Mark Milley, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Christopher Wray, John Brennan and on and on and on.

Each one of those “independent” fellows proved their courage by undermining the person to whom power was bestowed by the voters. To be called “independent” by Democrats and the media is to do everything Democrats and the media want you to do. Amazing how that works.

When The New York Times and Democrat senators say they have concerns about the “independence” of some appointee or federal agency that falls under the president’s purview, what they mean is they want some assurance that this appointee or that agency will rebuke Trump’s directives. They want to know whether they can still count on forces within the administration that will work on their behalf and thwart the president.

Note that Democrats are never asked about their “loyalty” or “independence.” They will do exactly what the media and party leadership expect. There’s no question. They often don’t even have to be told what to do. They all know what’s expected of them, as when Joe Biden’s attorney general Merrick Garland set about criminally prosecuting Trump during the 2024 election. Biden assured the public that he would never interfere while his Justice Department shook down his political opponent. Independence!

They don’t cherish independence. They want insubordination.



After Four Years of Appeasement by Biden, Does Mexico Believe It Can Take Advantage of America With Impunity?

 Victor Davis Hanson

Our neighbor to the south seems to have little concern that some 75,000 Americans on average die from mostly Mexican-imported fentanyl each year.


Mexican nationals, likely cartel members, recently crossed the border and shot and wounded an American hiker. Did they assume that Joe Biden was still president, and so it was still a veritable open season on Americans without consequences?

Mexico also recently balked at allowing an American transport plane to land, returning its own nationals apprehended as illegal aliens.

Was its attitude that Alejandro Mayorkas was still Homeland Security Secretary and thus working with Mexico to ensure that millions of illegal aliens could stay in America indefinitely?

After four years of Mr. Biden’s appeasement, Mexico seems to assume that it has a sovereign right to encourage the flight of millions of its own impoverished citizens illegally into America and further assumes that it can fast-track millions of Latin Americans through its territory and across our border.

Mexico either cannot or will not address the billions of dollars of raw fentanyl products shipped in — mostly from China — and then processed for export to America by its cartels across a nonexistent border.

Mexico seems to have little concern that some 75,000 Americans on average die from mostly Mexican-imported fentanyl each year — more deaths in just the last decade than all the Americans killed in action during World War I, World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War combined. Who then is our friend, and who is our enemy?

This appalling death toll is in part due to the deliberate efforts of the cartels to mask fentanyl as less deadly narcotics or camouflage the poison by lacing it into counterfeit prescription drugs.

Mexico encourages its expatriate illegal aliens to send back some $63 billion per year in remittances. That huge sum constitutes one of Mexico’s largest sources of foreign exchange, surpassing even its tourist and oil revenues.

These billions are often subsidized by American taxpayers. America’s local, state, and federal governments provide billions of dollars in food, housing, and health care entitlements that allow Mexico’s citizens, illegally residing inside America, to free up the cash to be sent home.

According to American census data, almost every year, the trade deficit with Mexico has increased from about $50 billion twenty years ago to $160 billion today.

That astronomical figure neither includes the $63 billion American outflow in remittances nor the multi-billion income from the cartels’ illicit drug sales in America.

Although one would never know it from the rhetoric of Mexican politicians, the entire Mexican economy, both legal and illicit, hinges on America accepting a worsening asymmetrical relationship.

Yet America has a lot of leverage with Mexico to ensure that it no longer assumes a permanent huge trade surplus with the United States, turns a blind eye to massive fentanyl shipments that kill thousands of Americans, encourages its own citizens to enter their neighbor’s country illegally, and counts on massive cash remittances from America.

Loud rhetoric, threats, and ultimatums do not work.

Usually, they earn Mexico’s furious retorts about Yanqui imperialism and ancient bitterness about a lost Aztlán.

The former Mexican president, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, used to brag about the millions of illegal aliens that were residing in America. He further advised expatriate Mexican-Americans not to vote for Republicans, whom he felt one day might close the border.

Mr. Obrador rarely reflected on why millions of his own citizens were fleeing his own country — only that it was a “beautiful” thing that they did.

Did Mr. Obrador hate President Trump more for challenging him by trying to stop the illegal influx or former President Joe Biden for embarrassing him by welcoming millions of them into America?

So, what should be America’s response to Mexico’s passive-aggressive policies?

Smile, praise Mexico as our greatest trading partner, and then quietly inform them that illegal aliens will be bussed to the border.

Once there, they could be given a generous care package, escorted through a border door, and left on the Mexican side from which they entered and thus could then be escorted in caravans home in the same manner that they arrived.

To maintain cordial relations and politely gain Mexico’s attention, we need a radical change in tone and action beyond just ending catch-and-release, finishing the wall, and making refugee status requests possible only in the home country of the applicant.

Rather than worry about who is sending remittances, why not politely place a 20 percent tax (about $12 billion) on all cash sent from America to Mexico?

We could also hail our mutual friendship and then reluctantly slap tariffs on imported assembled goods until the two-way trade is roughly balanced.

Who knows, once America is respected again and not considered an easy mark, Mexico could once again become a fine and reciprocal friend to the United States.

Tribune Content Agency


https://www.nysun.com/article/after-four-years-of-appeasement-by-biden-does-mexico-believe-it-can-take-advantage-of-america-with-impunity

Why This Billionaire Is Putting Far-Left Sen. Warnock on Notice

Sarah Arnold reporting for Townhall 

Billionaire philanthropist mogul Nicole Shanahan is making waves in Washington, demanding that U.S. Senators swiftly confirm Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services under the Trump administration. With her considerable influence and resources, Shanahan is putting political pressure on lawmakers, urging them to set aside partisan bickering and fulfill what she sees as a moral and critical responsibility to advance Kennedy for the future of America’s health. 

Shanahan, the former running mate for presidential candidate RKF Jr., threatens to rescind donations she made to Democrats if they refuse to vote in favor of his confirmation. She vowed to "personally fund" primary challenges against senators who didn't support Kennedy to head the HHS, saying, "While Bobby may be willing to play nice, I won't."

As she warned about a dozen senators, Shanahan specifically focused her message on Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-GA) and Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA). 

“The two candidates I helped elect, Sen. Raphael Warnock and Sen. Jon Ossoff, please know I will be watching your votes very closely,” she wrote on X. "I will make it my personal mission that you lose your seats in the Senate if you vote against the future health of America's children."

She reminded the senator of her pivotal financial support during the 2020 Georgia Senate runoffs, which many believe played a critical role in securing his seat. 

“Man do I regret ever helping you,” Shanahan said. “The only reason you’re in that seat is because I sent massive financial support to Shirley Sherrod’s c4 to mobilize rural Georgia during the 2020 runoff. I’ll be correcting that massive mistake asap. You’re awful.”

In addition to Warnock and Ossoff, she also outed Democrats Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), John Fetterman (D-PA), and Bernie Sanders (I-VT).