Thursday, January 16, 2025

January 20 – A New Independence Day


Independence Day, observed annually on July 4, is a national holiday that honors the ratification of the Declaration of Independence. This pivotal document marked the founding of the United States of America and its liberation from British tyranny and oppression.

In the mid-1990s, a song with the same title was awarded Country Music Song of the Year. Performed by Martina McBride, it celebrates a woman’s liberation from her abusive husband.

What are the commonalities? Oppression and abuse. Is anyone else sensing a strong stench of these in America, what used to be a shining city on a hill?

Could January 20, which is less than a week away, become another Independence Day for Americans who strive for freedom against a tyrannical federal government?

Tyranny begins gradually before escalating rapidly. After the Declaration of Independence was signed, Benjamin Franklin responded to the inquiry, "Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?" by saying, “A republic, if you can keep it.”

Where is America since the days of the Founding Fathers?

In the last twenty years, tyranny has intensified as America underwent a "fundamental change," as promised by a former U.S. President. America’s government and administrative state are now all-consuming. 

Many wars have been waged, wasting American lives and resources, frequently started under false pretenses to benefit the military-industrial complex, politicians, and their donors.

We have a figurehead president spending America into oblivion, supporting foreign wars, and leaving our borders wide open. That’s just scratching the surface.

What would a new Independence Day in America look like? Eight years ago, the appetizer was served, but the main course begins next week.

In June 2015, a brash and bombastic Queens real estate developer descended the escalator in his 5th Avenue skyscraper, promising to take on the establishment and “drain the swamp.”

In 2016, he astonished both the ruling class and himself by winning the presidency. Nevertheless, the government he was meant to lead sabotaged him, ultimately preventing him from securing a second term.

To many, November 2020 was the end. In reality, it was just a pause, time for one of the worst-treated Presidents in history to regroup. This allowed Americans to bear witness to the systematic destruction of America over the past four years.

Now he is ready to go, and Independence Day is around the corner.

Starting with his cabinet, Trump nominated a group of non-establishment individuals who share his America First vision and are not angling for the approval of the Washington Post or the Chamber of Commerce. This is a big difference from eight years ago, when D.C. newcomer Donald Trump tried to play nice with the GOP establishment.

The AP is worried that Trump will hit the ground running. “President-elect Donald Trump is preparing more than 100 executive orders starting Day One of the new White House, in what amounts to a shock-and-awe campaign on border security, deportations, and a rush of other policy priorities.”

Before the dust settles on his inauguration, the MAGA agenda will be planted and growing.

On the foreign policy front, expect swift negotiations with Russia, Ukraine, Israel, Iran, China, and North Korea, which are currently global hotspots and each a potential spark for a world-ending nuclear war.

Lawfare will end next week, hopefully with pardons for those who have been wrongly indicted and imprisoned, along with accountability for those who exploit the vast powers of the intelligence and justice departments for political gain and to punish their opponents.

Several U.S. Supreme Court vacancies are likely in the next four years, giving Trump the opportunity to appoint constitutional justices who will hopefully act as such once they wear their black robes.

Assuming that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is confirmed, there will be disclosure and accountability for the medical and pharmaceutical establishment, following the money and uncovering the truth about all things COVID. Making America healthy again will be more than a catch phrase.

Censorship will be replaced by the long-established principle of free speech. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is already cozying up to Trump to prepare for the free speech wave that will hit America next week.

What do Americans think about all this? Do they believe that a new Independence Day is on the horizon? Rasmussen Reports asked likely U.S. voters this question and found that Americans are ready for overdue change.

The response was unsurprising. “Most voters say nothing President Joe Biden did during the past four years helped them, and nearly half believe he ranks among America’s worst presidents.”

Going further, “Just two weeks before he leaves the White House, 54% say that since Biden became president, he has not enacted any policy that made their life better. Thirty-four percent (34%) say Biden’s policies have made their life better, and 11% are not sure.”

Rasmussen Reports also revealed that 40% of Americans feel their financial situation has declined in the last six months, compared to only 19% who believe it has improved.

On January 14, the Rasmussen Reports Daily Presidential Tracking Pollcompared Trump's and Biden's approval ratings at similar points in their presidencies. Trump had a 46% total approval rating, while Biden trailed behind at 43%.

If you want other opinions, Monmouth University polling agrees. “A majority of Americans say they are optimistic about the policies President-elect Trump will pursue in his incoming administration, according to a new poll from Monmouth University.”

The Real Clear Politics average poll of Trump’s transition shows approval +11.3 over disapproval. Out-of-touch corporate media may be distraught over Trump’s return, but the American people don’t share their pessimism.

Inauguration Day is less than a week away. Pray that Trump’s enemies, whether foreign or domestic, do not remove Trump during this period and that Biden’s team refrains from instigating a nuclear conflict, a new pandemic, or some other black swan event to derail the new administration. The Senate must quickly confirm Trump’s cabinet so they can commence their duties on day one.

Americans must hold their elected officials accountable. Trump was the clear choice of American voters. Congressional Republicans need to lead, follow, or get out of the way. Voters should keep the pressure on them, and I’m sure Team Trump is already doing that.

If Trump accomplishes even half of what he promises, we may celebrate another future Independence Day on January 20 every year.



at

X22, And we Know, and more- Jan 16

 



at

Pardon Every Single J6 Political Prisoner – Every Single One


Hey, did you hear about that Trump-loving J6 couple who threw a bomb and permanently injured a cop? He got five years. His wife got no years. Yeah, those J6ers really got off easy. Oh, wait, my mistake. They were not J6 defendants. They were a couple of Antifa scumbags who were mad because conservative commentator Michael Knowles was going to speak about transgender baloney. Instead of being treated with the same scorn and harshness that the J6 defendants have been, this federal judge actually said they were something along the lines of very fine people. How many years do you think a J6 defendant would get if he permanently injured a cop with a bomb? About a million. But there’s a vital difference. The Biden Administration (sic) likes Antifa terrorists and hates patriots.

The fact is we have a dual-track justice system, which is intolerable. That means we must not tolerate it. That means we must not accept it. That means we must not pretend that any verdict rendered by it is fair or valid. That means we must not allow the people who imposed it upon us in order to silence us, intimidate us, and exact vengeance upon us for the crime of defying them to succeed. 

All of the J6 prosecutions are illegitimate, not because the actions of the J6 defendants are all pristine – the vast majority are guilty only of thinking that as part of the People, they had a right to walk through the People’s House – but because they were not treated exactly the same way as those politically aligned with the people persecuting them. And there is no way to undo the taint of the two-tier justice system. There are reports that President Trump will commute sentences to get people out of prison, then follow up with a pardon “process” to evaluate each conviction. No, no, no. Every conviction – every single one, including those by people forced to plead guilty (and they were forced) – is tainted by the actions of the DOJ, the actions of biased judges, and the fact that the venue in DC was manifestly unjust. No J6 conviction can stand. Every conviction was unfair and unjust.

Donald Trump must undo this grave injustice. He must pardon every single J6 defendant/political prisoner – every single one of them (and no, I don’t mean the government flunkies). I don’t care if they walked through the rotunda taking selfies. I don’t care if they looted Nancy Pelosi’s vast booze stockpile. I don’t even care if they slugged a cop. Leftists beat up cops – and worse – all over the country during the riots after the death of that scumbag drug addict felon, and they were not treated exactly the same way as the J6ers. Their charges were dismissed or minimized. They got breaks and excused. They weren’t subject to Javert-like persecutions by deep state Democrats, which included being arrested by SWAT teams, held without bail for extended periods, tortured in the DC jails, charged with crimes that were not crimes, “defended” by leftist public defenders who wanted to see them convicted, tried by judges who had already demonstrated their bias, convicted by partisan 95%+ Democrat DC juries, and sentenced to ridiculously long prison terms.

The savage cruelty and maliciousness of the corrupt Department of Justice and FBI must be repudiated. President Donald Trump must pardon every single one of their victims. There is no other alternative. There is no compromise. Anything less than a total repudiation of this pogrom validates the unspeakable evil perpetrated upon these patriotic citizens. And that’s not all. President Trump should also apologize to them on behalf of the American people and government, as well as direct the Department of Justice to settle their multimillion-dollar civil rights claims without litigation. But let’s not get ahead of ourselves. It all starts with pardoning every single one of them on Day One of the Trump 2.0 administration. Not commuting – commuting implies some validity to the convictions – but pardoning, because prosecutions that are unjust cannot stand in whole or part, and every single one in those kangaroo courts was unjust.

The left will cry, and that’s good. They need to lose. They need to see what they’ve done come to naught. And they need to be held accountable. The government employees who were behind these atrocities – the prosecutors, the FBI agents, the brutal prison guard thugs – must all be identified and must all be prosecuted where appropriate – unlike them, we are not going to frame or coerce our opponents. We are going to hold them accountable. We cannot let this go. We cannot let this pass. And we certainly cannot abandon the people who have been tortured not because of what they allegedly did but because of who they voted for.

It is a feature and not a bug that the Democrats and the regime media lackeys will be outraged by this righteous act of justice. They need to be angry and shown that they cannot win. This is an important object lesson. The J6 vendetta was a disgraceful crime far exceeding the fake crimes in American history – like “McCarthyism” – the leftists always whine about. But there will also be Republicans who are going to cry about this, and they’re wrong to do so. They’re wrong to do so because the vital issue is not whether some individual went too far on January 6. This is about a systemic persecution of American citizens not resulting from an individualized consideration of their exact circumstances but simply because they were affiliated with the out-of-power party. You cannot tolerate this in a free society. If you do tolerate this, it stops being a free society. 

And to tolerate this because of some lame cliche like “respecting the rule of law” is ridiculous – these prosecutions themselves are a direct assault upon the rule of law. To give these charges and convictions any credibility at all, whether the person is accused of trespassing or punching a flatfoot, is to accept a two-tier justice system. That’s why the notion that people convicted of “violence” should not be pardoned is so misguided. To accept the validity of any J6 judicial proceeding is to accept that these biased, tyrannical prosecutions could ever generate a just result. A two-tier justice system targeting our people in a biased venue in front of biased judges via misapplied statutes can never deliver a just result. None of the proceedings undertaken against these J6 defendants could ever be just. Every single prosecution was and is absolutely corrupt. Every single trial verdict was fatally tainted. Every guilty plea was presumptively coerced. 

None of them can be upheld. To try to pick and choose between the allegedly deserving and allegedly undeserving J6 defendants ignores the reality that every single conviction is morally tainted and must be undone. The only way to obtain justice is by pardoning every single one of them – and then paying them compensation for the gross violations of their civil rights.

As a practical matter, every single one of them must also be pardoned immediately because going through a process of picking and choosing between them to decide who is worthy will take time. These citizens have all suffered enough from this injustice. An allegedly deserving J6 defendant should not wait one more second for his unjust conviction to be washed away and his life to be allowed to begin again while staffers pour over court records trying to pick and choose between who should be pardoned and who shouldn’t be based on some arbitrary criteria, while implicitly assuming that this two-tier justice system could ever be just. If you accept the deserving/undeserving paradigm – which I do not – it is still better that ten allegedly undeserving defendants be pardoned than one deserving defendant spend one single additional day in jail or be burdened by an unjust conviction.

So, the President must pardon every single one of them on January 20.

The New Rules require these pardons as well. Joe Biden has already pardoned his scumbag son, as well as commuted the sentences of 1,300 criminals, including perverts, spies, and even a cartoonishly villainous judge who took kickbacks to imprison kids in a private reformatory. It is almost certain President Demento – or whoever is making decisions for him because, at this point, he’s a human eggplant – will pardon a whole bunch of other scumbags in his inner circle, as well as trash like Liz Cheney and Anthony Fauci. But that’s OK. Their undeserved pardons would provide cover from the whiners for the J6 pardons.

President Trump cannot face his own supporters having let his own people rot while actual criminals who are Democrats get off free. President Trump should rip off the bandage and pardon every single one of them just as soon as he takes his hand off the Bible. By doing it all at once, he will create a media firestorm focused on the pardons that will draw attention away from the dozens of other vital, but potentially controversial, things that he will do that first day. As his enemies focus their fire on the pardons, all the other important stuff will slip through the cracks.

The dual-track justice system of the last four years is intolerable, and what is intolerable must not be tolerated. To do anything but pardon every single one of the J6 defendants is to tolerate this disgusting and disgraceful campaign of persecution. The entire leftist jihad against J6 protesters is tainted and has been illegitimate from the start and throughout. To allow this charade to continue is an injustice to the President's supporters who have been persecuted, and it is an insult to the United States of America and our Constitution. The Founders, in their wisdom, provided a means for the President to undo this kind of malicious prosecution, and he should absolutely exercise it. The screams and moans of the Democrats and their regime media flunkies will only make doing the right thing that much sweeter.



at

🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


at

Trump Gets Personalized Diet Coke From CEO



Coca-Cola CEO James Quincey presented President-elect Donald Trump with a personalized Diet Coke bottle ahead of his inauguration next week.

Trump’s Deputy Director of Communications Margo Martin shared a photo on X of Quincey gifting the bottle to Trump on Tuesday at Mar-a-Lago.

“Tonight, President Trump received the first ever Presidential Commemorative Inaugural Diet Coke bottle from the Chairman and CEO of Coca-Cola Company, James Quincey," Martin wrote. 

The bottle reads, “Inauguration of President of the United States Donald J. Trump.”

The bottle was given to Trump in a red box with a card speaking of the $55 billion in economic activity generated by the company and supporting 860,000 U.S. jobs.

“We’re proud to continue our decades-long tradition of celebrating the U.S. presidential inauguration with a commemorative bottle,” the card stated. 

Trump's fondness for Diet Coke is well known. During his first term, he even installed a button in the White House that he could press so one could be delivered to him. Trump joked to guests once when pushing the button that “[E]veryone does get a little nervous when I press that button.”

People around Trump say they rarely see him drinking anything else. UFC CEO Dana White said once during a podcast interview that he has “never seen Trump drink a glass of water.”



at

Sparks Fly on CNN After WaPo Columnist Denigrates Pete Hegseth's Military Service


 Sister Toldjah reporting for RedState 

The confirmation hearing for Pete Hegseth Tuesday was pretty intense, with the Secretary of Defense nominee refusing to be rattled despite the screeching of perpetually fauxfended Democrat senators, and one GOP senator shredding Democrats on the Armed Services Committee for being flaming hypocrites on issues like marital infidelity and showing up drunk for work.

In the aftermath of the hearing, the talking heads on the various cable news networks also had their say on what went down.

But on CNN, things got quite spicy when one of their panelists boiled Hegseth's "main qualification" down to him being a TV show host on Fox News.

The sparks started flying when leftist Washington Post columnist Catherine Rampell opined that Hegseth wasn't qualified to lead the Dept. of Defense in part because he had never "managed something as large as a Burger King," and saying "TV host" was his "main qualification."

This did not sit well at all with Republican strategist/GOP commentator Scott Jennings, who pointed out that his qualifications were extensive:

Rampell: I think it's not only about this unexplained flip flop on women serving in the military. It's not only about the fact that he hasn't managed something as large as a Burger King, probably, but that he could not answer basic questions. Not just gotcha questions, like questions like would you uphold the Geneva Conventions? Would you refuse an unlawful order if the president gave you one, which did happen under Trump before with Esper (ph)? Would you ever sick [sic] the U.S. military on American citizens?

You know, there are many examples of questions that, yes, he was very articulate and polished, and he's a T.V. host. That's his main qualification. I know in T.V. we sometimes get confused.

Jennings: Why do you denigrate this man's service? I don't understand, 20 years, decorated, Ivy Leaguer. He's a T.V. host. That's all he is.

(CROSSTALKS)

Rampell: Not every member who serves deserves to be in charge of the DOD.

Jennings: She said his main qualification is that he's a T.V. host, and I'm sorry, that's just baloney.

(CROSSTALKS)

Jennings: His main qualification is that he's a warfighter and he's going to be the closest warfighter we've ever had to the enlisted people running the Pentagon. He's decorated, he's an Ivy Leaguer, so he knows what he's doing.

"I think he's closer to the average enlisted man who has been deployed, and deployed and deployed, and anybody that's been up for this job internally," Jennings also said.

Watch:

Later, in response to a jab from Obama-Biden/Biden-Harris alum Ashley Allison, who stated "Tonight on CNN, the Republicans don't care about family values," Jennings zinged back by telling her "The party of Bill Clinton and Doug Emhoff don't get to lecture me."

Back in November after President-elect Donald Trump first nominated Hegseth, Jennings had to respond to similar arguments from other CNN panelists - and absolutely hit it out of the park:

"I hear all the criticism of him is that he's not the expected Washington pick. And I'm just saying to you that the American people just voted against the expected Washington pick." 

"He's got 20 years in service. Afghanistan, Iraq. Two bronze stars. Princeton, Harvard. Yeah, he's on TV, but so are the rest of us."

Watch:

To be fair, someone serving in the military and in a war zone does not automatically exempt them from criticism.

But I think that unless you can find something specifically related to a veteran's service that could legitimately be called into question (as the case was with Minnesota Gov./Dem VP nominee Tim Walz), starting off by denigrating someone's service in the armed forces is going to be a losing argument nearly every time.

Secondly, if you're going to argue that someone isn't qualified to serve in a presidential administration, whether it be in a cabinet position or something else, because they're not a Washington insider, you're going to lose that argument every time. Because, as Jennings correctly observed, Americans just demonstrated at the ballot box that they have rejected the status quo in favor of people who are willing to shake things up. 

And that is exactly what Hegseth is going to do if he gets confirmed.


at

Propaganda Press Wants You To Believe Trump Is Guilty Because Jack Smith Said So

Smith gave the stenographers in the corporate media everything they needed to keep hyperventilating about Jan. 6 before Trump’s inauguration.



The propaganda press dutifully fell in line with regime messaging Tuesday, as nearly every corporate media outlet ran with headlines claiming President-elect Donald Trump would have been convicted in the Jan. 6 case if he lost re-election — because lawfare specialist Jack Smith said so.

Smith, the former special counsel charged with weaponizing the justice system to go after Trump, released his report on the Jan. 6 prosecution, which was designed for a woefully uncurious media complex to regurgitate nonsense about the bogus case.

“The Department’s view that the Constitution prohibits the continued indictment and prosecution of a President is categorical and does not turn on the gravity of the crimes charged, the strength of the Government’s proof, or the merits of the prosecution, which the Office stands fully behind,” he wrote. “Indeed, but for Mr. Trump’s election and imminent return to the Presidency, the Office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial.”

That’s all she wrote, as far as the gleeful stenographers in corporate media were concerned. Smith made it easy for them — they didn’t even have to read the report — all they had to do was skip to the last paragraph to find what Smith wanted them to write about. And they did, time, and time, and time again.

What is perhaps most unsettling about how the media conducted itself is that it is essentially a job requirement for any prosecutor to believe their case would be successful, otherwise there would be significant questions as to why the case was being brought in the first place. Regardless of the fact that there was never any veracity to the case, the media took Smith’s obligatory belief in a successful prosecution as proof that Trump was clearly guilty.

That is like saying a person is guilty of murder because a district attorney brought murder charges — no trial necessary.

“The liberal media want one last sugar high off of their precious Jack’s investigation and throwing in a few extra huffs and puffs to court Smith for a future contributor gig and/or interview. Between all the liberal networks and book publishers, it’ll be a cat-fight for his services,” Curtis Houck, managing editor of NewsBusters, told The Federalist. “As we saw with the Mueller probe and their infatuation since with his lead attack dog Andrew Weissmann, the hero worship of Smith will continue to take on an almost erotic status in the eyes of some loons on MSNBC and the lefty blogosphere.”

Smith included other self-aggrandizing lines, allowing the liars in the media to continue giving him the hero-of-the-republic treatment they always have.

“Special counsel Jack Smith said his team ‘stood up for the rule of law,'” The Associated Press declared, insisting, “The document is expected to be the final Justice Department chronicle of a dark chapter in American history that threatened to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power, a bedrock of democracy for centuries, and complements already released indictments and reports.”

Democracy and the peaceful transfer of power were never close to being threatened, and Smith himself laid that out in the report when he detailed how Jan. 6 was never an “insurrection,” as the media always claimed.

The report allowed NPR, NBC, The Washington Post, and many more to treat Trump’s re-election as a mere technicality standing in the way of a sure-fire conviction. Insurrection? Well, that couldn’t be proven on a technicality, too. Smith said the law was too old.

“Deranged Jack Smith was unable to successfully prosecute the Political Opponent of his ‘boss,’ Crooked Joe Biden, so he ends up writing yet another ‘Report’ based on information that the Unselect Committee of Political Hacks and Thugs ILLEGALLY DESTROYED AND DELETED, because it showed how totally innocent I was, and how completely guilty Nancy Pelosi, and others, were,” Trump said on social media after the report was released. “Jack is a lamebrain prosecutor who was unable to get his case tried before the Election.”



at

Dems to Pam Bondi: Please Don't Do to Us What We Did to America


Of all the hearings that took place for Donald Trump's cabinet today, the one I found the most interesting was Pam Bondi, who Trump has selected to be his attorney general. 

I had a distinct feeling that this was going to be the one person they feared the most, because a Trump attorney general would be the one that hurt Democrats the most when it came to Trump's draining of the swamp. I've written in the past that the people elected Trump to fix the economy and close the border, yes, but there are quite a few Americans out here who were screwed over in some way by Democrats, and they want retribution. 

I imagine Trump is one of those people who wants it, so I can guess that Bondi is going to be his instrument of righteousness. No one feels this more acutely than the Democrats. 

That's not to say I think Trump will encourage Bondi to corrupt herself and her office in order to bring Democrats to their knees, but I'm pretty sure Bondi won't have to go that far. There's a laundry list of things Democrats did that are worth investigating, and I have a feeling Bondi will be spoiled for choice in terms of threads she can start pulling on. 

Democrats certainly exhibited certain concerns about which threads. Adam Schiff, for instance, seemed very concerned that Bondi was going to open up on Jack Smith. Nancy Mace, like many who watched, wondered aloud by Schiff was so concerned about this. 


As my friend and colleague Susie Moore reported on Wednesday, Sheldon Whitehouse also seemed to focus on how Bondi would conduct herself in the position of attorney general, which sounds suspiciously like how Garland did things, which Bondi was absolutely ready to bring up: 

WHITEHOUSE: It would not be appropriate for a prosecutor to start with a name and look for a crime; it's a prosecutor's job to start with a crime and look for a name, correct?

BONDI: Senator, I think that is the whole problem with the weaponization that we have seen the last four years and what's been happening to Donald Trump. They targeted Donald Trump — they went after him, actually starting in 2016. They targeted his campaign; they've launched countless investigations against him — that will not be the case if I am attorney general. I will not politicize that office. I will not target people simply because of their political affiliation. Justice will be administered even-handedly throughout this country. Senator, we've gotta bring this country back together, we've got to move forward, or we're gonna lose our country.

Bondi is a terrifying woman if you're a Democrat, and just how scared of her Democrats are more than came through in their questioning of her. They would hardly ever let her speak. When she started giving answers they didn't like, or when she'd checkmate them, they'd either talk over her or immediately move on. 

You only do that when you have an unmitigated contempt for the person you're engaging with, and I'm pretty sure that this contempt stems from their fear of Bondi. They are terrified that she will do to them what they did to Trump, to Republicans, and to us. 

Their strategy isn't necessarily to stop her confirmation — which is more than likely going to happen — it's to set up narratives that make Bondi seem like she's abusing her position in order to weaponize the justice system against Democrats. Yes, this is exactly what the Democrats did during Biden's administration, but they're still hoping they can sell this narrative in an age where the legacy media has lost a great deal of its power. 

If they can get social media clips circulating of them warning Bondi against doing such a thing, and admonishing her for Trump even thinking about doing it, then when a Democrat is inevitably caught up in something they can appear on networks with a "see, I told you she was corrupt" and a "Trump is everything we warned everyone about" for good measure. 

But this isn't going to stop Bondi. I believe she will do exactly as she says and not use her position to attack Democrats just because they're Democrats... she will attack Democrats because they broke the law. 

So if they did nothing wrong, then Democrat politicians have nothing to worry about. She will maintain the honor of her position... but if you did break the law, then don't be surprised to have a one on one meeting with justice as arranged by Pam Bondi. 



at