Monday, January 6, 2025

The First Week of 2025


The first week of 2025 is a reminder that while the country and the world face peril, we are on the cusp of a revolution in the West by voters who demand accountability and a sweeping out of arrogant, corrupt, and incompetent leadership. The week began here with an Islamist from Houston who plowed an F-150 into New Year’s celebrants on New Orleans’ Bourbon Street. He left the truck and began firing into the crowd. Brave law enforcement officers dashed to the scene of the mayhem and eliminated him and the threat.

The first announcement by the FBI denied that it was terrorism, though the perpetrator’s truck carried an ISIS flag that law enforcement or the FBI had tried to cover from view. That was retracted shortly afterward though the Bureau emphasized he acted alone -- this under circumstances too early in any investigation to be credible.

At about the same time, a military man home on leave from Germany rented a Tesla truck, loaded it with explosive materials, and drove it to the Trump Hotel in Las Vegas, where 17 seconds after parking, he shot himself to death and the explosives were triggered. The second incident is particularly mysterious as the purported driver had a sterling record, was well-versed in explosive devices and surely knew the Tesla would -- as it did -- contain the explosion. For days online posters with various levels of expertise and good sense have been trying to solve the mystery. One of the most prevalent hypotheses was that the driver was shot before the incident and the truck made it to the scene by means of its self-driving capabilities. This proved to be the least plausible as Tesla engineers confirmed the vehicle was not ever in self-driving mode and videos of the charging stations showed the person law enforcement said was the driver charging the vehicle. Whatever the truth is, few people any longer trust the FBI to give a credible account. The agency has lost our respect as regards integrity, veracity, and competence. For years now it has been tracking down grandmas who walked through the Capitol on January 6, surveilling school board meetings and churches, and doing little to monitor and protect us against what every rational person knows -- the growing threat of Moslem extremists.

Almost instantly, it gave us yet another reason to distrust it.

@donsurberhttps://open.substack.com/pub/donsurber/p/highlights-of-the-week-472

“ITEM 11: AP reported, “FBI releases new video of a suspect planting a pipe bomb near DNC offices on eve of the Capitol riot.”

Right after two terrorist attacks, the FBI suddenly finds a new video. It’s as if the Bureau holds information until it wants to change subjects in the news.”

Trust in the competence of elected leadership in the West has been worn thin, largely because of feckless immigration and economic policies, the same things which have cost Democrats dearly. Wednesday, the Liberal party caucus met to discuss removing Justin Trudeau, Canada’s fey dictator. The AfD party in Germany seems to be picking up steam and in the United Kingdom. Keir Starmer’s popularity keeps plunging as Brits grow increasingly angry about the Labour party’s immigration mess, its economic failures, and its Stalinist restrictions on free speech.  Tommy Robinson, now confined to jail, and Elon Musk have revived discussion of the horrid sexual abuse of thousands of young British women by Moslems in Great Britain,  the biggest scandal in British history that the British press (including the BBC) and Labour politicians keep trying to ignore. Starmer can lock up Thompson but X is global and he can’t bottle that up.

In a series of posts, Charlie Peters lays out the scandal and the enormous efforts the politicians in Labour districts (which is where the outrages occurred) went to protect the criminals and denigrate their victims -- their endeavors motivated by a combination of political advantage, prejudice against Britain’s  lower-class girls, and minimal expectations of the Third World thugs they imported. 

He begins by describing how this began in the 1970s and how social workers and others who reported it were shut up, and goes on to how it took on epidemic proportions:

But the true horror of the grooming gangs scandal is that Rotherham wasn’t the only town.

There was also Rochdale.

A gang of Asian men had abused girls.

They took them to a 'special place' and plied them with alcohol.

Then they were passed around from man to man, like a ball.

There was a list of names on the door of the building where the girls were kept.

Whenever an abuser went there, they put a tick by their name so they could pay for their rapes at the end of each month.
It was like a paedophile honesty box. The failures in Rochdale were so severe that it took the bravery of whistleblower @MaggieOliverUK to expose the scandal in the town.

And then there was Telford.

The Labour council there tried to block an inquiry. 10 men wrote a letter to the Home Secretary saying it wasn't necessary.
Some claimed reports of abuse, uncovered by investigative journalists, had been 'sensationalised', even after what had been revealed in Rotherham and Rochdale.

But when the Crowther report was written, it found there were at least 1,000 victims. [snip]

Rotherham, Rochdale and Telford are just a handful of the towns and cities that have endured these abuse gangs.

I've compiled compelling reports and successful prosecutions from across Britain, from Bristol and Oxford right up to Glasgow.

The horrors in each of these towns deserve their own report, their own reckoning, their own righteous response. 

And many of the girls were trafficked between towns by their abusers.

When parents tried to intervene, they were often threatened with arrest. I've met parents who were desperate for support from the police, but instead found themselves being penalised when they raised concerns about their children, their little girls, being targeted by rape gangs.

The grooming gang story is a stake through the heart of multicultural Britain.

For decades, gangs of largely British Pakistani men deliberately targeted and abused underage white girls.

And the authorities did nothing because they did not want to rock the boat of racial tensions. They literally prioritised community cohesion over the safety and security of women and girls.

In many cases the abuse went beyond rape into sadism. Reading the testimony, attending the trials, speaking to survivors... sometimes, it is truly harrowing. [snip]

I'm convinced that it is the greatest race hate crime in modern Britain. [snip]

And the people who set our national conversations don't want to see it that way.

He goes on to show how they manipulated statistics to cover for the perpetrators and the high percentage of criminals in these gangs were Pakistanis. 

He reports that Starmer refused to meet with a whistleblower who had evidence of these abuses when he could have made a difference.

As Trudeau and Starmer’s stars seem to have faded, president-elect Trump will be confirmed on January 6 and inaugurated on the 20th. In the meantime, he’s having a significant effect here and abroad, being treated, in effect, as if he’s already holding office. He endorsed Mike Johnson for speaker and Johnson won. Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum has agreed to take in people we deport, even those from other countries, if we will pay to transport them to their home countries. Concerned that Denmark was not adequately providing Greenland with the defenses needed against Russian intrusions, Trump had suggested we should buy it. This week, Greenland’s prime Minister Mute Egede announced Greenland should be independent of Denmark. Should that take place, I expect the Trump administration will work out a security agreement with Greenland. The level of UNRWA's U.S. funding was cut by Trump; Biden reinstated it. Now it looks as if (bolstered by the fact that they once again have an ally in the United States) Israel has banned this Hamas-cover from operations in Gaza and the West Bank. Since its reason for existing was always establish and support an operating theatre for destroying Israel, it really is about to be put to bed for good.

Buckle up. There are a lot of tectonic plates shifting beneath our feet this year.



X22, And we know, and more- Jan 6




0:00 / 0:00

15 seconds

15 seconds

0:00 / 0:00

15 seconds

15 seconds

The Biggest Peacetime Crime—and Cover-up—in British History

 The serial rape of thousands of English girls went on for many years. Few in power cared. Then Elon Musk started tweeting.

Britain’s prime minister Keir Starmer


LONDON — The grooming and serial rape of thousands of English girls by men of mostly Pakistani Muslim background over several decades is the biggest peacetime crime in the history of modern Europe. It went on for many years. It is still going on. And there has been no justice for the vast majority of the victims.

British governments, both Conservative and Labour, hoped that they had buried the story after a few symbolic prosecutions in the 2010s. And it looked like they had succeeded—until Elon Musk read some of the court papers and tweeted his disgust and bafflement on X over the new year.

Britain now stands shamed before the world. The public’s suppressed wrath is bubbling to the surface in petitions, calls for a public inquiry, and demands for accountability.

The scandal is already reshaping British politics. It’s not just about the heinous nature of the crimes. It’s that every level of the British system is implicated in the cover-up.

Social workers were intimidated into silence. Local police ignored, excused, and even abetted pedophile rapists across dozens of cities. Senior police and Home Office officials deliberately avoided action in the name of maintaining what they called “community relations.” Local councilors and Members of Parliament rejected pleas for help from the parents of raped children. Charities, NGOs, and Labour MPs accused those who discussed the scandal of racism and Islamophobia. The media mostly ignored or downplayed the biggest story of their lifetimes. Zealous in their incuriosity, much of Britain’s media elite remained barnacled to the bubble of Westminster politics and its self-serving priorities.

They did this to defend a failed model of multiculturalism, and to avoid asking hard questions about failures of immigration policy and assimilation. They did this because they were afraid of being called racist or Islamophobic. They did this because Britain’s traditional class snobbery had fused with the new snobbery of political correctness.

All of which is why no one knows precisely how many thousands of young girls were raped in how many towns across Britain since the 1970s.

What we do know is that the epicenter was the postindustrial mill towns of England’s north and Midlands, where immigrants from Pakistan and Bangladesh settled in the 1960s. White locals say the grooming and rapes began soon after. In Rotherham, the rundown Yorkshire city where the scandal first broke, local police and councilors were notified about systematic grooming and sex abuse by 2001. The first convictions did not occur until 2010, when five men of Pakistani background were jailed for multiple offenses against girls as young as 12 years of age.

These men targeted the most vulnerable girls—the poor and the fatherless, children in care homes—with candy, food, taxi rides, and drugs. They raped the girls, passed them around family and friendship networks, pimped them into similar networks in other cities, then discarded them as they reached the age of consent.

This pattern was repeated in as many as 50 cities across the country, including in leafy Oxford and liberal Bristol. A 2014 inquiry estimated that 1,400 girls had been serially raped in Rotherham alone.

The details are established beyond doubt in the small number of prosecutions that eventually made it to court. The suffering described in the court papers is sickening to read: The girls were drugged, beaten, sodomized, gang-raped, trafficked, and tortured.

One night in Oldham in 2006, for example, a 12-year-old girl named “Sophie” entered a police station and reported that she had just been molested in a graveyard by a man named “Ali.” A desk officer told her to come back with an adult when she was sober. Two men accosted her in the police station. Joined by a third, they raped her in their car. When they dumped her on the street, she asked a man named Sarwar Ali for directions. He took her to his home, raped her, and gave her money for bus fare home. A man named Shakil Chowdhury pulled up in his car and offered to take her home. He abducted her and took her to a house where he and four other men repeatedly raped her.

Several girls were murdered. In Manchester in 2003, Victoria Agoglia was repeatedly drugged and raped before being given a fatal dose of heroin at the age of 15. In Blackpool that same year, 14-year-old Charlene Downes disappeared—her body was never found.

In Telford, Azhar Ali Mehmood groomed Lucy Lowe from the age of 12 and impregnated her at 14. He burned her alive in her own home with her mother, her disabled sister, and her unborn second child, also fathered by Mehmood. Mehmood was jailed for life in 2001 for murder—not sex crimes.

In the age of “Say Her Name,” no one important thought it worth saying the names of these girls. The girls, their rapists told them, were “white slags,” worthless and expendable. Apart from a few whistleblowers, most of them women, and courageous journalists such as Julie BindelAndrew NorfolkDouglas Murray, and Charlie Peters, the media showed no interest.

Why? Because this was the wrong kind of racially motivated crime, committed by the wrong kind of criminal.

The majority of the victims were white, plus some Sikhs. The majority of their abusers were of Pakistani and Bangladeshi Muslim extraction. The majority of their crimes were committed in cities with a Labour Party–controlled council and a Labour Party MP who needed Muslim votes. This led to institutional racism of the inverted kind, and that enabled the perpetrators to do as they liked.

The system itself became corrupted. Welfare workers admit that they failed to report crimes because the police told them they would be accused as racist. The leader of one rape gang in Oldham, Shabir Ahmed, worked for the local council as a “welfare rights officer” and ran his gang from the council welfare office. Another member was on the Oldham Youth Council.

In multiple cases, local Labour politicians of Pakistani background interfered with police inquiries. In Telford in 2016, 10 members of the Labour council wrote to the Home Secretary, the Conservatives’ Amber Rudd, claiming that allegations of abuse were “sensationalized” and that there was no need for action. Two years later, an investigation by the Sunday Mirror newspaper counted some 1,000 victims. The superintendent of the West Mercia regional police “significantly disputed” the figures and said the Mirror had “sensationalized” the issue.

The police were in no hurry to inquire. Senior police repeatedly denied there was a problem, then denied its obvious racial and religious elements. Government and police agree that, regardless of which party is in power, the peace in multicultural, mass-migration Britain depends on “community relations.” The law-abiding public’s alarm about the consequences of mass immigration is suppressed, stigmatized by the political class and the press as the racism of a chimerical “far right.”

For the Labour Party specifically, “community relations” means cultivating urban Muslim voters. Nazir Afzal, who was Chief Crown Prosecutor for northwestern England between 2011 and 2015, claims that in 2008 the Home Office advised police not to prosecute grooming gang cases, because the girls had “made an informed choice about their sexual behavior.”

In late December 2024, Jess Phillips, the Home Office’s Minister for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls, refused requests from the Oldham city council for a government-led inquiry into the institutional failure and corruption that had made the Oldham cases possible. The only thing Phillips is safeguarding is her seat.

The Conservatives were not much better. In 2019, shortly before he became Conservative leader and prime minister, Boris Johnson complained that money spent on investigating historic child abuse crimes was money “spaffed up a wall.” (Spaffing is English slang for ejaculation.) In 2020, Johnson’s Home Office suppressed the Conservatives’ own research on grooming gangs. Releasing it, they said, was not in “the national interest.”

Elon Musk has changed the Conservatives’ political interest, so their new leader, Kemi Badenoch, is now calling for an inquiry. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is caught between his party, his voters, and—should he find them—his principles. As director of the Crown Prosecution Service, or CPS, between 2008 and 2013, Starmer secured some successful convictions against the rape gangs. But Starmer and his lawyers also failed to bring other major cases to court.

In 2009, the Starmer-led CPS dropped its prosecution of a grooming and rape gang in Rochdale, despite having DNA evidence and hours of testimony on video. When Nazir Afzal started working as a Crown prosecutor in 2011, one of his first actions was to reopen the case and reverse the CPS’s decision. In 2012, Afzal secured the convictions of nine men, eight of them of Pakistani background and one of Afghan background.

Afterward, Afzal said that “white professionals’ oversensitivity to political correctness and fear of appearing racist may well have contributed to justice being stalled.”

Starmer admitted that “particularly in cases involving groups, there’s clearly an issue of ethnicity that has to be understood and addressed.” But he insisted that the failure to prosecute had been caused by “a lack of understanding” about the victims: a “credibility issue.”

It is now Starmer who has a credibility issue. Maggie Oliver, the Manchester-based detective who helped to expose the abuse in Rochdale, says that Starmer is “as guilty as anyone I know” for the institutional failure to protect some of Britain’s most vulnerable children.

Starmer has yet to address the Labour Party’s historic role in this mess, or his own record of triangulating complicity. He has yet to say whether he agrees with his minister Jess Phillips that there should be no national inquiry. But now that Musk has said the unsayable about the unspeakable, there is no going back.

Starmer’s lawyerly equivocations look like what they are: covering the party’s backside at the expense of justice for the victims. Announcing another inquiry will not be enough to pacify the British public. Nor will it reduce the popularity of Nigel Farage and his Reform UK party. Their main appeal is that they say what no one else dares to: The entire British system has become morally bankrupt. Ironically enough, Musk’s call for Farage to step down—Farage, Musk says, “doesn’t have what it takes”—is likely to take the pressure off Starmer.

“No justice, no peace” is a common slogan among the activist class that chose not to act against the rape gangs. There will be no peace in Britain until the full truth is known, the law is restored, the bureaucracies are held to account, and rule by “community relations” is reversed. The Labour government will do its utmost to do its least.

Pressure from Musk has already done what the outrage of the beaten-down British people cannot do. Musk has shamed the British government into explaining itself. Next, it must be forced to act.

 

https://www.thefp.com/p/muslim-grooming-gangs-cover-up-keir-starmer-elon-musk?utm_campaign=260347&utm_source=cross-post&r=rd3ao&utm_medium=email

Why Biden Is Carpet Bombing His Exit


Have you noticed? The guy is nuking everything on his way out the door!

What is this fresh hell the Biden administration is leveling the country with? In every way possible, on every from hes able, abusing as much power as he possibly can the current President of the United States is attempting to obliterate America.

At the end of the very same week where at minimum two terrorist attacks were attempted on American soil, Biden decided to release a terrorist from Guantanamo Bay. 

In a day where crime has exploded across our cities and violent crime taking human life, Biden commutes nearly all of the sentences of mass murders on death row.

And at weeks end he awarded the most anti-American, anti-western, anti-Semite the infamous George Soros the Presidential Medal of Honor. 

Hes literally rewarded terrorists, killers, and treason.

He is unrepentant about opening the southern border and saying yall come. And his minions in legacy media like Lawrence ODonnell are out there pushing the theory that the real tie connecting heinous murderous terror pushing devils is the uniform of the U.S. Army instead of the fact that they get radicalized and change their names to something like Jabbar.

Despite the fact that even Bidens administration stopped more than a thousand people on the terror watch list while attempting to enter, democrats seem to believe that its service personnel are more likely to be terrorists than actual terrorists.

Yet Team Biden, led by the big guy, are doing all they can to unleash chaos in the final stretch.

They hope to create such a mess that a new administration (even stacked with door kickers at the head of every agency) will be consumed by the chaos. So much so that they can not implement the long term changes that are desperately needed.

Which is why President Trump must get his nominees approved, which is why the house needed to elect Speaker Johnson as his ally.

The last two administrations brought about changes in the relative blink of an eye compare to all other administrations in the modern era. 

The presidency has become a position that can and likely will now have as much impact in shaping culture as does the peoples Congress. Understanding that means being on offense 24/7. 

President Trumps first term was footnoted with wild successes produced at near manic speeds. Some of which then hit a massive buzz saw called CoVid. 

The left is masterful at sowing chaos. 

They love the cover that the messiness gives them to plot and destroy. Biden is sowing a plentiful harvest of it on his way out the door. 

And my prayer is that we dont get distracted by the tyranny of its urgency.

The coming team already has much to address. The fortunate thing about this group of leaders stepping into their new roles is that they arent expecting a walk in the park. 

That determination should help them overcome the all out scorched earth left behind for them. 

But they will need our support when the headwinds change. And the more clean up they accomplish the more those headwinds will attempt to blister them.

Gear up friends this is where the work really starts!



Kash Patel Has His Work Cut Out for Him Fixing the Disgraced, Incompetent, and Poorly-Dressed FBI


Just when you thought the once proud Federal Bureau of Investigation was utterly broken, it had to go out and completely humiliate itself in public by putting the woefully unprepared Assistant Special Agent-in-Charge Nosering Uptalky out there to explain that the Muslim dude who everybody else had called a terrorist wasn’t a terrorist. Yeah, he was a terrorist. Let’s not even get into how they left all sorts of relevant evidence at his unsecured house after searching it. Great work from a garbage organization whose sole focus, besides pursuing the latest DEI fads, has been terrorizing parents going to school board meetings to complain about perverts, praying Catholics, and grandmothers taking selfies in the Capitol Rotunda. What a disgrace. Boy, does Kash Patel ever have his work cut out for him, but he can do it with the right combination of institutional savvy and utter ruthlessness in pursuit of excellence.

Kash must start by enforcing standards, something the FBI hasn’t had in a very long time.

Let’s be clear about the problem. It’s a problem for many once-venerated institutions. At one time, these institutions had respect, even awe. If you grew up as a kid in the 70s, you watched Efrem Zimbalist, Jr., as Inspector Erskine, chasing bank robbers, mobsters, and commies on “The FBI” every Sunday night. No, the FBI wasn’t perfect, but they had a standard then. When they showed up, they looked like professionals. They spoke like professionals, not like valley girls spewing irritating jargon (“That is my ask.”) They weren’t a bunch of gender studies majors recruited straight out of the University of College. Most were lawyers, veterans or had previously been in law enforcement. Right now, we have an FBI that’s hiring baristas. Seriously.

As the New York Post explains, the hiring policies of the FBI have hit rock bottom. They’re hiring fat people. They’re hiring drunk drivers. They’re hiring people with Tourette’s. What’s next? “You have the right to remain #$%!#@?”

And we all know the reason the garbage FBI leadership is hiring these losers. They all check some diversity box. Maybe they’re the right color du jour, or they have the right plumbing, or they’ve got the approved sexual preference. Healthy cis white male with relevant experience – nope! Three hundred-pound lesbian animists of color furry with a peg leg and bipolar disorder – here’s a gun, a badge, and a warrant to arrest an American for unlawful praying.

 What the FBI is not hiring for is quality. They’re hiring specifically not to have quality because quality people ask questions and don’t want to participate in the kind of fascist pogroms the establishment has been launching against normal Americans. The current FBI is pretty good at busting Americans for daring to believe they have a right to participate in their governance. Of course, they’re not so good at stopping mass killers or terrorists. Every single time, it seems the guy is on their radar. Well, except for the guy in New Orleans, where the FBI was the last agency to figure out that the dude flying the ISIS flag was a terrorist. They didn’t see him coming. But of course, they never see them coming. And once they come, it’s off to the memory hole. So, what’s the story of the Las Vegas guy? No, not the one this week. The last one, the mass murderer one. What’s his story, and for that matter, what’s the story of the guy who took a shot at the President and clipped his ear? And what’s the story of the guy who’s waiting to shoot the President? We haven’t heard much of anything about them. We know more about Taylor Swift’s sex life than the guys who tried to whack Trump. And that’s just fine with the FBI.

The FBI was once badass. Now it's just bad. As always, the legendary @Iowahawk on X said it best. His legendary tweet about institutional capture and devolution, says it all:

1. Target a respected institution

2. Kill & clean it

3. Wear it as a skin suit, while demanding respect

This is a skin suit scenario. The FBI is living off the corpse of yesterday’s reputation while failing to perform adequately today. And speaking of skin suits, do you think maybe that they could show up wearing an actual suit? You had that ridiculous clown in New Orleans go on national television wearing a freaking windbreaker. An FBI agent’s default should be a suit and tie, and a gender-appropriate one at that, especially on TV. Looking like you’re running an errand to Safeway is clown show stuff. This isn’t about being nitpicky. This isn’t about being like uptight Dean Wormer. This is about basic leadership. Do you want to express yourself? Don’t be an FBI agent. You must enforce high standards of dress and appearance to demonstrate that your organization holds itself to a higher level. You can’t be professional if you don’t look professional. No, making agents dress like professionals is not the final answer to the problems with the FBI, but it is a first step toward rebuilding professionalism. And a fringe benefit is that it will drive out the weirdos even faster.

Kash Patel needs to go in there on day one and end all the DEI crap, reimpose uniform standards, reimpose physical fitness standards so that agents no longer look like spheres, and make it very clear that the FBI will once again be the number one law enforcement agency in the world. The problem is, as with so many other institutions, that we have the FBI wanting to be treated as the number one law-enforcement organization in the world but not wanting to do any of the hard things that come with earning and retaining that status. And the hard things that come with that include being competent and dressing like adults instead of refugees from the local Starbucks.

Oh, he’s going to face resistance, but the thing about Kash Patel is that he’s worked in these bureaucracies before and knows all the games. He knows the “I don’t understand what your intent is” game. He knows the “I’ll just nod my head and then wait until the appointee forgets and moves on to some other thing” game. And he knows the “I’ll just flat out lie to the boss” game. He cannot tolerate any of that. He needs to fire people, and contrary to legend, you can fire federal employees. And you can certainly transfer them to the new office in Buggery Gulch, New Mexico, where his problem children can chase cactus rustlers.

No quarter, no slack, and no tolerance for sub-par performance. The FBI, if it’s going to continue to exist – and my preference is that it does not, having so thoroughly disgraced itself over the last decade – then it must regain the respect of the American people. To do that is going to require the merciless enforcement of standards. No dishonesty. No equivocation. No more looking like you slept in your clothes and get that stud out of your nose, Special Agents Kayden and Ashley. We need Inspector Erskine. 



🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


This morning, Justin Trudeau announced that he will resign as Prime Minister.

 

He has also prorogued parliament until March 24. 


With all three opposition parties having pledged to vote the government down, this means that a federal election could happen in early May, just a few months from now.


That’s almost six months earlier than scheduled!


There are still plenty of questions to be answered: who will replace Trudeau? How long will that leadership race take? 


One thing is clear though, Ross: we need to be ready.


The legacy media already has their marching orders: they stand to lose hundreds of millions - if not billions - of dollars if there’s a change in government. Their coverage of the election will be biased and unfair! 


We, on the other hand, have a different agenda: deliver Canadians the objective, non-partisan news coverage they badly want and need. 


Can you help us do that?

With an election imminent, we need to be ready. 


Legacy media has government money – we have you. 


Please help us be ready for an election today!

SUPPORT INDEPENDENT MEDIA

House Speaker Mike Johnson Discusses the Legislative Agenda for 2025


Speaker of the House Mike Johnson appears on Fox News with Maria Bartiromo to discuss the details and mechanics of the House legislative agenda for 2025. As Johnson notes the large legislative constructs are what President Trump want’s to kickstart the agenda and that is the timeline the Speaker is working with.

Within the discussion Mike Johnson outlines the specifics of the legislative packages and the expected timelines he is targeting for completion. WATCH:



Former DNC Fundraiser Says She’s Been Appointed to Trump Inaugural Committee: ‘I Am Done’ With Democrats


Rusty Weiss reporting for RedState  

Lindy Li, a former major Democratic National Committee fundraiser, tells RedState she has been appointed to the Trump Vance Inaugural Committee. 

From raising funds for the resistance party to raising money for President-elect Trump's inauguration — the transformation appears to be complete.

Li has been one of the most vocal critics of the Democrat Party following the election, particularly blasting the Harris campaign repeatedly for essentially setting close to $2 billion on fire and ending her campaign in significant debt.

Now, she's excitedly revealed she "was just appointed to Trump’s inaugural committee!"

Li suggests there are others just like her — former donors to the Democrat Party - who are jumping ship as well.

"I’m the first major DNC donor to join," Li stated. "I’ve recruited others ... who are also extremely upset with the DNC."

Li, who less than five months earlier was named by WIRED as a top influencer "shaping the 2024 election" as a "Kamala Harris supporter," now claims she is under a constant barrage of racially motivated attacks on social media for speaking out about the Harris campaign's fleecing of donors.

She says she's been subject to vile insults "on a daily basis simply for asking questions about the Harris campaign’s financial mismanagement."

"I am done with them," Li added. "The Party of Woke and DEI is now calling for me, an American, to be deported just because I dared to tell the truth. They accuse me of working for either Russia or China, never mind the fact that the Chinese communist regime killed my great-grandfather."

"Democrats have exposed their racism for all to see — but it was always simmering beneath the surface."

Democrats have criticized Li for quickly abandoning the party following Harris' spectacular implosion in the 2024 presidential election. Has it been a simple awakening? If Trump's inaugural committee is convinced enough to have her on board, that suggests they have confidence in her going forward.

Li torched her former party post-Kamala as having the "stench of loser."

"And I’m sorry, I’m speaking as a Democrat myself, this brings me no joy to say it, but I feel like Democrats are going to be consigned to the wilderness for at least the next four to eight years," she added.

Li eventually announced she was leaving the Democrat Party, saying it was akin to "leaving a cult."

She recently told Fox Business that her departure from that cult has led to her being ostracized and subject to "public shaming" online.

In another Fox News interview just weeks ago, she torched Vice President Harris over rumors she was looking to run for governor of California in 2016 or possibly even running again for president in 2028.

"America has said, 'We don't want to be coconut-pilled. We do not want Kamala Harris. We don't want failed border policies,' and I feel like I'm liberated, and I can finally tell the truth that the Democrats completely failed on the border," said Li.

The former DNC fundraiser has expressed an extreme level of optimism over the return of Donald Trump to the Oval Office, suggesting President Biden's successor will carry the American economy to a "new era of prosperity."

"You can just feel it," she said.



A CBS News Reporter Wasn't Going to Stay Quiet Regarding the Left’s Smear Campaign Against SCOTUS

Matt Vespa reporting for Townhall 

CBS News’ Jan Crawford said something odd regarding the most underreported story of 2024, claiming the honor belongs to Joe Biden’s declining mental health. She’s not wrong, except it’s been the most underreported story throughout his presidency. Yet, Crawford also had a lengthy commentary about the media, Democrats, and the Supreme Court, which couldn’t have been more accurate.  

So, let’s get past the eye-rolls over Joe Biden’s cognitive decline because they’re all going to say they missed it, even though we know that’s not true. It was an open secret that the press was worried they would help Donald Trump or lose access to the White House—that’s not an excuse. Still, Crawford took a blowtorch to the institutional Left’s crusade against the Supreme Court, succinctly calling out their BS in less than two minutes.  

She noted it began post-Dobbs, which overturned Roe v. Wade, which led to this parade of attacks on the legitimacy of the Supreme Court, which she found to be weak sauce. It was spurred by Senate Democrats who began a long war against the third branch. As she aptly described, the stories about the so-called scandals involving some justices were beyond overblown. The ruling in the presidential immunity case was grossly misreported, and all of this was done to sway the public into thinking this was a corrupt court. It’s not. She admitted it’s conservative, but they’re doing lawyer’s work, arguing statutes, and debating their respective interpretations of the Constitution.  

Yes, as most institutions do, the Court’s public opinion standing took a hit; this isn’t new. Also, the Supreme Court is supposed to be insulated from public opinion. They’re not supposed to know or consider what the public wants in their decisions. That’s not their job. Congress and elected legislatures decided on those matters.  

And even with the smear campaigns, “the Court's public opinion remains much higher than our other institutions, including the White House, Congress, and by far the news media,” added Crawford.  

Here are her remarks in full: 

“It really started and took off in the wake of the Dobbs decision. The Court's ruling that overturned Roe versus Wade. The outrage over that decision was so extreme that you saw I think a quite calculated effort to undermine the legitimacy of the Supreme Court by Democrats — Senate Democrats for example — hearings, stories about scandals, some of which were pretty overblown to say the least.  

So, that has an impact on public opinion. You know, the public starts to believe that this Court is corrupt, that this is, you know on the take, none of which is true. I mean, this is still a Court, you may disagree with their decisions, it's a very conservative Court. It is not a corrupt Court.  

These are nine justices who have very different views on how to interpret the Constitution, who are kind of in this titanic struggle over law, not politics. Even the immunity decision. I mean, that decision was so misreported to say that the Court was going to save Trump from a criminal trial. No, it wasn't. That was never the decision. In fact, that decision is going to help protect Joe Biden from any future prosecution by Donald Trump if he wanted to do that. So, you know, when we look at public opinion polls, sure, the Court's taken a hit, but that's true over the years. 

The Court often takes a hit, so do other institutions. And the Court's public opinion remains much higher than our other institutions, including the White House, Congress, and by far the news media.” 

Well said, ma’am.