Saturday, December 28, 2024

As Christianity Dies In The West, The West Dies, Too

Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

Since that quote was first published in 2017 by G. Michael Hopf in Those Who Remain, it has become one of the most oft-quoted phrases in the conservative universe. (I’ve quoted it a number of times.) That’s because it perfectly captures the current state of Western civilization.

I’ve experienced a good bit of that Western civilization. I’ve had the good fortune to have lived over a quarter of my life outside of the United States. I’ve lived in Cuba—albeit on a rather well-known American base rather than in the Communist part—Italy, Germany, and France. I do not say good fortune because I think living in America is bad. On the contrary, living outside of the United States has given me a perspective on America that I’m most certain I wouldn’t have had I not lived outside her borders for as long as I did.

I spent most of my time outside of America in Europe. The thing that most attracted and attracts me to Europe is the history, or, more accurately, the physical manifestations of history. From the Colosseum and the Vatican in Rome to the Louvre and Mont-Saint-Michel in France to the Heidelberg Castle and the Cologne Cathedral in Germany, I simply can’t get enough. Europe is covered with countless such monuments, most of which long predate the United States.

Many of what I call monuments to history aren’t actual monuments at all. Most are structures built for a function, and most of them were created to either celebrate Christ or were created by men impelled by Christianity. Of course, Christianity is, like everything crafted by man, imperfect. Still, overall, the civilizations grounded in Christianity have created more freedom, technological advances, and prosperity than any civilization in human history.

As it relates to America, as much as leftists want to argue that America was not founded as a Christian country, they’re simply wrong. Christianity infused virtually every element of life in what became the United States and the Europe from which its founders came. While one can make the argument that men like Franklin or Madison may have been “deists,” the reality is that they were very much part of the penumbra of Christianity that infused the colonies.

240 years on from America’s founding is where Hopf’s good times / hard times construct comes in. As Western civilization gets farther away from Christianity, the worse it becomes.

To repurpose a Winston Churchill line, Christianity is the worst form of religion except for all the others which have been tried. At its zenith, Christianity accomplished much. The Christian world ended slavery around the world. It brought us functional manifestations of individual liberty and democratic institutions. It freed men from the farm and sent us to the moon. It’s done much more, from the mundane to the magnificent, and driven prosperity across the globe.

At the same time, whether it’s Al Sharpton, televangelists, or the anti-western Communist currently running the Catholic Church, Christianity has, and has had, its share of charlatans, hypocrites, and grifters. But so, too, has every aspect of human life.

This is where Hopf meets Voltaire. Voltaire said, “If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him.” That is exactly what has happened to Western civilization. As a Christian-powered prosperity has flourished in the West, the belief in Christ has collapsed, and many of those weak men of whom Hopf writes have invented their own gods.

In this case, the gods they’ve created are communism, environmentalism, and victimization, usually in concert with one another. Of course, the only reason the adherents of those philosophies have had the luxury to pursue them in the first place is because of that very prosperity Christianity and its world created.

Just as the Communist Manifesto was written by a despicable grifter who lived off the labor of others, today’s leftists argue that everyone has a “right” to healthcare, housing, and food, among other things. Unlike the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights, however, every one of those things requires someone else to work with pay for others to provide those “rights.”

Today’s environmentalists have the luxury of pushing for “green” energy only because actual, functional sources of energy exist to allow the grift to continue. They can pretend their preferred energy sources are “green” only because leftist governments and media ignore reality. Like leaders of other cults, they command their followers to ignore what’s right in front of them. Whether it be child slaves in the Congotrillions of wasted dollars, “green” equipment that can’t be recycled, or infrastructure that doesn’t provide the promised energy, nothing can move them from their green mantras.

At the same time, the victim mindset that has taken hold because leftists have no more understanding of human nature than communist philosophers do. Life is unfair. There always was and always will be inequality. It doesn’t matter if it was the Roman Empire, the Han Dynasty, the Soviet Union, or America today; inequality has always existed, and different groups were/are disproportionately represented in the various classes.

Unlike most civilizations, Western civilization, in general, and America, in particular, offers everyone the opportunity to succeed and improve their lot. However, creating a victim narrative/grift is far easier than recognizing that reality and doing the hard work necessary to overcome challenges and succeed.

These three ideologies can generally be encapsulated in the larger anti-Western, anti-white religion that has infected the left. That is why the borders have been open, and tens of millions of invaders from third-world countries have flooded into America and Europe.

While the Hispanics who are flooding across American borders are said to be more Christian than Americans, they have almost zero connection with or adherence to the mores and values that Christianity infused America with. In Europe, the invaders are almost all Muslims. In both cases, at the same time that Christian culture evaporates, the people whose forebearers created Western are overwhelmed by invaders who don’t appreciate or share the culture in the first place.

That’s a recipe for disaster. Even famed atheist Richard Dawkins, who calls himself a “Cultural Christian“ recognizes that. “I call myself a cultural Christian, and I think it would be truly dreadful if we substituted any alternative religion.” Christianity built the modern world, and for all its imperfections, its successes far outweigh its failures.

There is simply no other religion, political philosophy, or human framework that has brought more freedom and more prosperity to more people than Christianity. As Christianity collapses throughout the West, civilization will necessarily follow. We already see it. From economic freedom to freedom of speech and much in between, the religious fictions embodied in the anti-western and anti-white philosophy are sowing social and economic ruin across the West.

As we celebrate this Christmas season with a glimmer of hope on the horizon, we would do well to remember that while a Christian West may not be perfect, it’s far superior to anything else yet created. If the West does not resurrect and respect Christianity and the society it produced, it will find itself reverting to the mean of human history, one characterized by scarcity, violence, and tyranny. Weak men rarely thrive in such a world.



X22, On the Fringe, and more- Dec 28

 




De Tocqueville on the Difficulty of Freedom


“Nothing is more wonderful than the art of being free, but nothing is harder to learn how to use than freedom.”  (Alexis de Tocqueville)

There have actually been people in history who have found slavery to be more comfortable than freedom, and indeed, I would argue that many such individuals exist today.  They would rather be taken care of by the government (or, socialism) than risk the “freedom of opportunity” necessary to provide for themselves.  Sadly, that just feeds the egos and lusts of power-hungry politicians who live to control other people and tell them what to do.  And when you control somebody’s finances, you definitely control them.  Congress can’t even go home for Christmas until they try to pass some kind of budget that gives them trillions of dollars to spend to enslave the masses.  

We today don’t call such government oppression “slavery” (our Founding Fathers did), but in one sense, that is exactly what it is.  People are “enslaved” if it is only the government which allows them to have and do.  “Allowed freedom” is not freedom, it is indeed another term for slavery.

But many who do want freedom do not really understand what it is or where it comes from.  It is a gift of God, as Jefferson said in the Declaration of Independence, and thus is defined by that Author.  “There is no liberty without morality,” Edmund Burke wrote, and by that, he meant the morality that comes from on High.  Modern Marxist Leftism has rejected that morality for a human-defined selfishness and decadence that starts with “every man does that which is right in his own eyes.”  But this godlessness and immorality will end in tyranny, not freedom.  And Leftists know it.  

Burke explained this very nicely:  “Society cannot exist unless a controlling power upon will and appetite be placed somewhere; and the less of it there is within [i.e., self-control], the more there must be without [government].  It is ordained in the eternal constitution of things, that men of intemperate minds cannot be free.  Their passions forge their fetters.”  Self-government is not Washington, D.C.  Self-government is a person governing themselves, controlling themselves in harmony with the laws of God, which provide true freedom.  Otherwise, as Burke said, a person’s “passions forge their fetters.”  They will be self-destructive, and destructive of others.

Burke further wrote:  “But what is liberty without wisdom, and without virtue? It is the greatest of all possible evils; for it is folly, vice, and madness, without tuition or restraint.”  This is what de Tocqueville meant in the quote at the beginning of this article.  Too many people do not know how to use freedom for they do not know from whence it comes.  Such has long been a curse of man and the main reason why “slavery” (government oppression) is far more common in history than true freedom is.

Licentiousness is not freedom, as modern Democrats seem to believe.  To have a “license” to drive a car does not mean you can do anything you want to with it, like drive through masses of humanity like that terrorist did in Germany before Christmas.  Freedom has rules, freedom must be bound by laws, personal restrictions.  If I hurt myself, I will eventually hurt others because if I cannot control my actions towards myself I will, at some point, cross the line in my actions against others.  If I lie to myself (i.e., the person I love the most), I WILL lie to others (people for whom I have lesser concern).  If I am unfaithful to myself, I WILL be unfaithful to others.  Morality starts with self.  All of the Ten Commandments regulate the actions of individuals, they are not rules for government organization and oversight.  If we don’t control ourselves, however, the government will have to do it for us.  Or, as Burke said, “Society cannot exist, unless a controlling power upon will and appetite be placed somewhere.”  Self-control or government tyranny (slavery).  “There is no liberty without morality.”  

Too many people believe that “as long as I don’t hurt others, I can do as I please,” but that fantasy does not exist in real life.  Such selfishness is the very antithesis of liberty, for “no man is an island,” no one lives to themselves.  Our actions can, do, and will affect others; such is inescapable.  Morality starts with self, but does not end there, and indeed, in one huge sense, can be defined as selfless, concerned behavior towards others.  Start your own country, live by yourself, and yeah, maybe you can do what you want.  But there is no such utopia.  A person simply cannot be immoral without, at some point, hurting himself and others.  We live in a society, communities, and our behavior affects those with whom we come into contact.  The less we control ourselves, the more we will need the government to do it for us.  Or “society cannot exist.”

So, de Tocqueville is exactly right:  nothing is more wonderful than the “art” of [true] freedom, but nothing is harder to learn how to use than freedom, i.e., the freedom “endowed” to us by our Creator.  The Democratic Party, the Left, has made its living by creating chaos, by teaching that selfishness and licentiousness are “freedom.”  No, they are not.  They are the worst kinds of slavery, and they WILL inevitably produce government tyranny.  Just look at America today, especially the fruits of sexual decadence and inner-city poverty and crime, to see just exactly what Democratic Party/Leftist “freedom” has produced.  Only a deluded, degenerate Democrat would call that “freedom.”  But it is exactly what they want because it gives them the power they crave.

Godly morality is freedom.  We need to be teaching that to our children, but we aren’t.  Licentiousness, unhindered “freedom” eventually leads to anarchy which is the forerunner of totalitarianism.   As William Penn said, “Those who will not be governed by God will be governed by tyrants.”



Trump Is Right About the Panama Canal



President-elect Donald Trump isn’t back in the Oval Office yet, but he’s wasting no time publishing big ideas and holding foreign countries accountable to their commitments. 

“We’re being ripped off at the Panama Canal like we’re being ripped off everywhere else,” Trump said during recent remarks in Arizona. “We will never, never let it fall into the wrong hands.”

“The Panama Canal is considered a vital National Asset for the United States, due to its critical role to America’s Economy and National Security. If the principles, both moral and legal, of this magnanimous gesture of giving are not followed, then we will demand that the Panama Canal be returned to us, in full, and without question,” Trump continued. “To the Officials of Panama, please be guided accordingly!”

"Every square metre of the canal belongs to Panama and will continue to belong [to Panama],” President JosΓ© RaΓΊl Mulino released in a video statement on X. "It's not for sale."

But Trump never asked if the canal was for sale and history shows us it was the United States military  that build the canal and the American taxpayer who footed the bill. 

“The U.S. Army played a critical role in the development of the canal. By the time the work was done and the first ship had transited the canal in 1914, the project had not only become the most expensive public work ever built, it had also set the bar for a new epoch in the advance of technology and medical discovery that was just beginning. Even more, completion of the canal put the world on notice that it now had to reckon with the United States as a global power,” the Center of Military History states. 

Further, prior to the U.S. handing over management of the canal the two countries signed a pair of treaties. One of them gave the U.S. the right to use military force to reestablish neutrality in the canal if it ever were to be threatened. 

“The Treaty Concerning the Permanent Neutrality and Operation of the Panama Canal, or the Neutrality Treaty, stated that the United States could use its military to defend the Panama Canal against any threat to its neutrality, thus allowing perpetual U.S. usage of the Canal,” the State Department says. 

Now that the Chinese Communist Party has embedded itself in the ports and companies running the canal, where ships are being charged exorbitant fees, Trump has a right to invoke the terms of the treaty. 

“Chinese companies have been heavily involved in infrastructure-related contracts in and around the Canal in Panama’s logistics, electricity, and construction sectors…China’s BRI [Belt and Road] expansion into port-related facilities has stirred alarm for the United States over ambitions seen as endangering the neutrality of the Canal,” the Center for Strategic and International Studies explains. “Of those goods transiting the Canal, over 60 percent originate in or end up in U.S. markets, intrinsically tying free and fair Canal access to U.S. national security and economic interests in the country.”

“With the expansion of Chinese influence in the waterway, the Canal will likely continue to be a point of tension in U.S.-China relations. China does not operate the Canal, it only manages the two ports on either end, meaning it does not interact or influence all goods transiting the Canal. However, the increase of Chinese companies’ control over transshipment cargo operations bound for the United States and other countries is a point of contention,” CIS continues. 

The Chinese aren’t interested in neutrality, they’re interested in control and global domination. Trump is correct in his efforts to hold the Panamanian government accountable to a treaty they agreed to and is rightfully paying attention to the crucial waterway in order to protect American interests. 



🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Saving America From The Propaganda Industrial Complex


Glenn Beck’s latest book, ‘Propaganda Wars,’ aims to educate — and enlist — Americans in the battle against the sinister manipulation of public opinion.



Glenn Beck’s new book Propaganda Wars: How the Global Elite Control What You See, Think, and Feel is a prescient warning to all freedom-loving Americans about the threat posed by fake news, strategic disinformation, and mainstream media fraud.

Starting with his first chapter “Welcome to Clown World,” Beck goes full throttle after the cynical falsehoods and control strategies of mass media and their many official and unofficial partners.

Propaganda is nothing new, but the accelerated ability to use unimaginably powerful technology to push it is new. As Beck writes:

We are now entering the nuclear bomb age of the propaganda wars, where the dissemination of misleading or manipulated content will have profound, far-reaching consequences, challenging the very foundations of democracy and societal cohesion.

While creating some “wonderful things,” Beck also warns that advanced technology is “also serving to completely erase the line between fact and fiction.”

First, the positive: This book serves as a timely wake-up call regarding the need for a society to have an objective standard of truth.

As Beck observes, “if people aren’t allowed to pursue a greater understanding of the highest, most foundational truths, then what is the point of all the other rights?”

Beck’s plan to launch an upcoming massive citizen watchdog project (“the biggest grassroots journalism project in history”) through The Blaze, where readers and viewers can send in evidence of corruption and fraud in institutions, corporations, and government bodies, is also apt.

“Sometimes conservatives act as though the worst possible outcome is that America will become like Venezuela or China or Russia or some other modern authoritarian state. I wish that were the case,” Beck writes, noting that in his past book Dark Future he has warned that the reality is far more serious and includes:

The possible rise of a highly powerful never-before-seen technocratic hellscape. This future will be dominated by artificial intelligence, government controlled digital currencies, bio-tracking devices, automation and other new technologies, all of which are being designed by Davos elites as we speak.

The book also deserves serious credit for not being merely partisan: Beck warns about misinformation and the potential for out-of-control crony capitalism and government power, urging readers not to put their hope in politicians for salvation. Beck clearly legitimately believes in the right of even his ideological enemies to question whatever they’d like and to support whichever politician they’d like. In fact, published Oct. 22, Beck’s book at times sounds a pessimistic note that’s at odds with the current enthusiasm on much of the right following Trump’s recent victory.

“If we don’t change our course, and soon, the conservative and libertarian movements in America will remain trapped in an endless cycle of failure and disappointment no matter what happens on election day 2024, 26 or even 2028,” writes Beck.

The book looks at the danger of deepfakes, the proliferation of bots, social media addiction and manipulation, AI, algorithmic manipulation that reinforces echo chambers, digital currencies, and other technological hot topics that Beck has already addressed at length in his past work.

However, the main focus of Propaganda Wars is on methods for distinguishing truth from fiction. This includes starting with skepticism about those who only tell you what you want to hear, discarding outlets and voices which believe in impossibilities (such as that men can be women), and watching out for purely narrative-based presentations of facts.

Swatting down popular conspiracy theories, Beck argues that elites don’t plan and implement specific crises but instead prepare exhaustively for whatever crisis occurs, then offer their high-control, low-freedom solution to the public as the only response. He mentions Event 201 wargames preparing for a pandemic response as one example of how elites are always preparing their own script and response to whatever occurs so they will be ready to push propaganda and force outcomes.

Beck sounds the alarm against what he calls the Propaganda Industrial Complex (PIC), outlining how “Davos elites” manipulate and coerce mass public opinion and decisions. The PIC, according to Beck, is “a vast network of key organizations, government agencies, international institutions, media outlets, corporations and NGOs, all of whom work together to systematically gain more power, more wealth and influence over society.”

By preparing extensively for all scenarios, the PIC then exaggerates the crisis when it happens, maximizing fear and confusion in order to implement big government programs and new technologies in the name of safety. They roll out ambitious, freedom-killing public-private partnerships and then silence and demonize any dissent, presenting it as crazy and unfounded.

Beck’s book is not only for believers, but ultimately he argues that an objective standard of truth falls away when an agreed upon reality falls away. Thus, the belief in God and Christ is central to his thesis, with Beck explaining that biblically the promotion of untruth is “a sin against God” and a form of harm to oneself and humanity.

Beck admits that he himself is “not perfect” but says he’s always trying to improve and resist the impulse to live in an echo chamber. He points to the length of his podcast and more in-depth content he produces as an example of avoiding simple soundbite journalism.

The most powerful portions of Propaganda Wars entreat America to return to biblical roots and abandon relativistic ideas about identity, reality, and right and wrong before it is too late. Even many churches and formerly trusted institutions have fallen prey to the “woke mob,” while Hollywood, the academy, and pop culture “lost all common sense a long time ago.” It’s hard to argue with that, and Beck’s plan to counter it with a grassroots-level infusion of truth is smart and brave.

Next, the bad: The book begins with a denunciation of woke culture and the extremes of the transgender movement that is already well-known to most people. The falling away of any standard of truth that is agreed upon by everyone is clear, as is the danger of a faceless power to swoop in and instrumentalize that in a social credit system. (Propaganda Wars warns of the coming of a technocratic control grid run by AI that I already cautioned about and outlined in my 2022 book, The Globalist Plan to Destroy America.)

Furthermore, in focusing on how to distinguish what is factually true or not, Beck fails to address the aesthetic, subjective, and emotional roots of why people believe something or not, which is not just about what is factually true, but with what is aligned with their values and worldview. In other words, Beck tries to fuse scientific rationalism with a moral worldview which is in some ways the fatal flaw at the heart of libertarianism.

Ultimately, Beck’s book doesn’t present much that’s new other than his grassroots watchdog project. That said, it still serves as an important reminder and wake-up call to the dangers that America — and the world — faces in the technocratic age.



GOOD NEWS STORY

 Homeowner wins fight for property after little known law transfers title.

Nebraska man was forced to fight for his beloved home back after nearly losing it to an investor over a measly $588 tax debt.

Kevin Fair, 68, has been involved in a years-long legal battle over the title of his home - which he owned for nearly three decades - after he failed to pay just $588 in overdue property taxes.

The Scottsbluff-native first fell behind on his property taxes in 2014 following his late wife’s crippling diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, a chronic disease that damages the central nervous system, including the brain, spinal cord and optic nerves.

Unable to repay the measly few hundred dollars, along with the interest fees, the Scotts Bluff County sold the lien to a private investor in 2015, as allowed by state law at the time.

Fair then took the case to the state’s Supreme Court, where they ultimately ruled against the 68-year-old homeowner.

However, he felt that wasn’t right, so he took the case to the US Supreme Court.

'They stand to make the money, and I won't have anything after living here for 25 years,' Fair told First Alert 6.

Kevin Fair, 68, has been involved in a years-long legal battle over the title of his home - which he owned for nearly three decades - after he failed to pay just $588 in overdue property taxes

Kevin Fair, 68, has been involved in a years-long legal battle over the title of his home - which he owned for nearly three decades - after he failed to pay just $588 in overdue property taxes

The Scottsbluff-native first fell behind on his property taxes in 2014 following his late wife¿s crippling diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, a chronic disease that damages the central nervous system, including the brain, spinal cord and optic nerves. Pictured: The Scottsbluff, Nebraska home

The Scottsbluff-native first fell behind on his property taxes in 2014 following his late wife’s crippling diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, a chronic disease that damages the central nervous system, including the brain, spinal cord and optic nerves. Pictured: The Scottsbluff, Nebraska home

Even though the title was sold, the longtime homeowner, who was given the home as a wedding present, was granted permission to stay while the legal dispute played out.

Following the disappointing ruling and the inclusion of the US Supreme Court, the Nebraska Supreme Court was ordered to reconsider.inve

Nearly 10 years later, in August 2024, the state Supreme Court ruled that Fair should retain title to the house.

Fair's appellate law firm, Pacific Legal Foundation, said that their client and the investor have amicably resolved their dispute, ending the legal battle.

The years-long case has since confirmed that home equity 'is protected by the Constitution,' said Christina Martin, senior attorney at Pacific Legal Foundation.

As for Fair, the ruling 'is protecting him from, in all likelihood, homelessness,' she added.

Fair and his late wife, Terry, had already paid off the mortgage for their home in Scottsbluff, a town of 14,300 people in far western Nebraska, by the early 2010s.

But in 2013, Terry received her disabling diagnosis and Fair quit his job to care for her, it was then that the couple fell behind on their property taxes.

The county then placed a lien on the home and listed the delinquency in the newspaper.

After Nebraska Supreme Court ruled against the homeowner, Fair took the case to the US Supreme Court which ordered the state's Supreme Court to reconsider the 68-year-old's case. Pictured: The United States Supreme Court

After Nebraska Supreme Court ruled against the homeowner, Fair took the case to the US Supreme Court which ordered the state's Supreme Court to reconsider the 68-year-old's case. Pictured: The United States Supreme Court

In 2015, the county sold the tax lien to the private investor, which paid the home's taxes for three years.

Yet, when the investor called for the Fairs to pay the accrued $5,268 in taxes, interest and fees, they couldn't. 

Scotts Bluff County turned the title and equity over to the investor in 2018.

Fair's lawsuit contended that while the state should be allowed to collect its debt, it should not be allowed to seize the home or the equity in it above the debt amount - $54,000 in this case.

The court victory is bittersweet for Fair as his wife died in 2019 before the winning verdict was reached.

Fair also suffered from a stroke earlier this month. The stroke was so severe that Fair will now require a ramp built at the home to accommodate his needs, Martin said.

GoFundMe fundraiser has since been organized for the struggling homeowner. As of Friday afternoon the donation page has reached a whopping sum of $11,800.

Nebraska changed its law in 2023 so that homeowners are no longer at risk of losing their equity over unpaid property taxes.

Musk Says a Pardon for Sam Bankman-Fried ‘Will Fetch a High Price’ (from Biden) as the FTX Founder’s Lieutenants Get Shortened Sentences

 Bankman-Fried’s former girlfriend sees her time behind bars reduced, likely for good behavior.

Shortened sentencing for two of the fallen crypto mogul Sam Bankman-Fried’s closest associates — Ryan Salame and Caroline Ellison — throw into sharp relief the uncertain fate of the FTX founder, who could be angling for a pardon. 

That possibility has been floated by the world’s richest man, Elon Musk, who is also a close adviser to President-elect Trump. Mr. Musk ventures that he would be “shocked” if Bankman-Fried is not pardoned by President Biden. In a followup comment, the Tesla founder claimed that “this administration is selling pardons and his will fetch a high price.” 

Mr. Musk offers no evidence for that shocking suggestion, and it is unclear whether he intended it in a literal sense. The pardon power, which covers all “offenses against the United States,” is among the least fettered of all presidential powers and is entitled to “absolute” immunity for being subsumed under what the Supreme Court calls the “conclusive and preclusive” authority of the president. Mr. Biden has come under scrutiny for a pardon issued to his son, Hunter. 

Mr. Musk appears to be alluding to the tens of millions of dollars that Bankman-Fried showered on politicians and causes when his crypto empire was so vast that some reckoned he could become the world’s first trillionaire. Prosecutors accused him of siphoning off customer funds to make more than $100 million in donations before the 2022 midterm elections. He was the second most munificent donor to Mr. Biden in the 2020 race, behind only Mayor Bloomberg. 

Salame, an FTX executive, pleaded guilty to fraud charges in September 2023. In May he was sentenced to seven and a half years in prison. The Federal Bureau of Prisons, though, now lists his release date as March 1, 2031, more than a year earlier than his initial release date of April 2032. That alteration was first reported by Business Insider.

Ellison, who was once Bankman-Fried’s girlfriend and the leader of an investment fund, Alameda Research, that was at the center of the wipeout that led to the filing for bankruptcy and handing up of criminal charges, pleaded guilty to seven counts of fraud and conspiracy. 

Ellison emerged as a cooperating witness for the government and testified that Bankman-Fried was “the one who set up the systems that allowed Alameda to take the money, and he was the one who directed us to take customer money to repay our loans.” She added that the “whole time that we were dating, he was also my boss at work, which created some awkward situations.”

That testimony secured her a two-year prison sentence, far shorter than the 25 years without the possibility of parole that Bankman-Fried received from Judge Lewis Kaplan of the Southern District of New York. Now, the Federal Bureau of Prisons discloses that Ellison, who is incarcerated at Danbury, has been assigned a release date listed as July 20, 2026, three months earlier than her initial one.

As part of the First Step Act signed into law by Trump, federal inmates are eligible to reduce their sentences by up to 54 days for each year served if they exhibit good conduct. Sentences can be further reduced for participation in prison programs. A search for Bankman-Fried’s expected release date, though, simply yields the result “Release Date: UNKNOWN.” Bankman-Fried has appealed his sentence, and requests a new trial with a new judge.

Bankman-Fried is incarcerated at the Metropolitan Detention Center at Brooklyn. His fellow inmates there include the rapper Diddy, whose real name is Sean Combs, accused of sex trafficking; and Luigi Mangione, the alleged murderer of the chief executive of UnitedHealthCare.

https://www.nysun.com/article/musk-says-a-pardon-for-sam-bankman-fried-will-fetch-a-high-price-as-the-ftx-founders-lieutenants-get-shortened-sentences


Trump Keeps Mum as MAGA Civil War Breaks Out and Goes Viral Over Immigration

 Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy’s pro-H-1B visa stance ignites fierce debate among the president-elect’s supporters.

There is a growing public rift in the ranks of MAGA world before President-elect Trump’s new term has even begun and the incoming commander in chief has been uncharacteristically quiet regarding the online strife between his most fervent supporters.

The divide, which has been referred to as a “MAGA Civil War,” was sparked after recent comments by Trump’s appointed heads of the Department of Government Efficiency, Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, in which they both said online that they are in support of the H-1B Visa program. 

While Trump campaigned on promises of sweeping immigration reform, including mass deportations, the duo has taken a stance that is not as stringent.

“The number of people who are super talented engineers AND super motivated in the USA is far too low,” Mr. Musk said in a post on X on Wednesday. In a separate post, he pointed out that a “shortage of excellent engineering talent” is a “fundamental limiting factor in Silicon Valley.”

The next day, Mr. Ramaswamy, faced a backlash after posting on his X account a lengthy missive on the need for foreign laborers.

“The reason top tech companies often hire foreign-born & first-generation engineers over ‘native’ Americans isn’t because of an innate American IQ deficit (a lazy & wrong explanation). A key part of it comes down to the c-word: culture,” he wrote. “Our American culture has venerated mediocrity over excellence for way too long (at least since the 90s and likely longer). That doesn’t start in college, it starts YOUNG.”

The statements led some of the most devoted MAGA supporters to lash out.

“We welcomed the tech bros when they came running our way to avoid the 3rd grade teacher picking their kid’s gender – and the obvious Biden/Harris economic decline,” former Congressman and Trump’s since-departed pick to head the DOJ, Matt Gaetz, said on X. “We did not ask them to engineer an immigration policy.”

The H-1B visa program, the largest in the U.S. in terms of guest workers, allows American employers to hire foreign workers in “specialty” occupations. The program, which is backed by many in Silicon Valley and high tech, is aimed at those with specialized knowledge and a bachelor’s degree or the equivalent of work experience. There are annual caps on the numbers, which is 65,000, plus an additional 20,000 allocated to those graduating with master’s degrees or higher from a U.S. school.

The program has been criticized, among other things, as a form of corporate welfare since it can save companies money compared with costs they would have faced had they hired American workers. Opponents also argue that it depresses wages and causes Americans to stop pursuing degrees in certain specialized fields.

Far-right activist and Trump loyalist Laura Loomer said on X that she opposed the close relationship between Trump and Mr. Musk.

“[Elon Musk], who is not MAGA and never has been, is a total f****g drag on the Trump transition,” Ms. Loomer said on X. “He’s a stage 5 clinger who over stayed his welcome at Mar a Lago in an effort to become Trump’s side piece and be the point man for all of his accomplices in big Tech to slither in to Mar a Lago.”

In addition, Ms. Loomer was fuming after it was announced that Trump had appointed Indian-American entrepreneur and venture capitalist Sriram Krishnan as his new AI policy advisor, saying  that the appointment was “deeply disturbing.”

“It’s not racist against Indians to want the original MAGA policies I voted for. I voted for a reduction in H-1B visas. Not an extension,” Ms. Loomer wrote on X.

Mr. Musk fired back on his X account.

“Loomer is trolling for attention. Ignore,” he wrote in response on Thursday to another post with a screenshot from Ms. Loomer’s account where she asked, “Is DOGE a way to ‘cut spending’ or REDIRECT the spending toward the pet projects of tech bro billionaires? It’s looking like the latter TBH.”

Later that day, Mr. Musk posted “a reminder” that X’s algorithm automatically reduces a user’s reach if they are blocked or muted by a significant number of credible users on the platform.

“Just a reminder that the algorithm is trying to maximize unregretted user-seconds,” he said. “If far more credible, verified subscriber accounts (not bots) mute/block your account compared to those who like your posts, your reach will decline significantly.”

Ms. Loomer accused Mr. Musk of removing her verified status on X for her comments.

“If they ban me for sticking up for all of you, it’s been nice fighting for all of you and President Trump,” she wrote. “X removed my verification, my subs, and my ability to get premium again.”

Curiously absent from the online infighting has been Trump himself.

His last post on X was on Christmas day when he posted a gif of himself steering Santa’s sleigh while doing his dance from the campaign trail that went viral.

https://www.nysun.com/article/trump-keeps-mum-as-maga-civil-war-breaks-out-and-goes-viral-over-immigration