Saturday, December 21, 2024

Trump's 12-Year Term


It turns out, no matter your party affiliation, it may have been good for America that Trump lost in 2020.

Had Trump won in 2020, his second term would have probably looked a lot like his first term. The Democrats would have fixated on him losing the popular vote and resisted him every step of the way. The country would have remained in gridlock as Democrats rejected his platform.

And most likely, we'd now be swearing in a new Democrat president. 

Instead, since Trump lost, we had four years of Joe Biden and got to see the Democrat Party unmasked. Yes, the country suffered -- badly and almost beyond repair -- but it did expose the Democrats' true colors and toxic agenda and "woke" up enough people.

Yes, the last four years were a disaster. Pick your poison:

  • Abruptly pulling out of Afghanistan.
  • High Inflation.
  • Cancel culture accelerated.
  • DEI run awry.
  • Unconstitutional executive orders.
  • Coddling Iran and failing to confront Russia and China.
  • Identity politics.
  • Wars in Ukraine, Middle East, and throughout Africa.
  • College campus takeovers and chaos.
  • Transgenderism: hormone blockers for kids and sex change operations for inmates.
  • Crime. Lots of uncontrolled crime.

And of course, the biggest disaster of all: an open border. 

Biden and the Democrats effectively welcomed more than ten million illegal migrants -- nobody knows exactly how many -- housing many in luxury hotels while Americans struggled.

The sad irony is that though Democrats accused Trump of treason related to only one day -- January 6 -- Biden and the Democrats arguably committed treason every day for four years while they consciously and purposefully allowed our country to be invaded.

To take a step back, while America does not have a state religion, we do have our own secular trinity. Our trinity is comprised of freedom, democracy, and capitalism. Together our trinity creates a melting pot meritocracy, albeit imperfect at times. Our unique mix creates the recipe for achieving the "American Dream." 

America is indeed great -- better than the rest -- because we embrace these core values. The rest of the world has spent the better part of the last century chasing us and trying to mimic our trinity. 

Though we don't have a monopoly on any of the values, we employ them better than most. It provides our competitive advantage. It's our ace.

Yet over the last four years, Democrats have done their best to reject our trinity. Instead of working to make it better, they rejected it for some sort of socialist, conformist experiment straight out of an Orwellian novel.

Biden was the dress rehearsal, a puppet of sorts for Obama 2.0. Had Harris won, it would have been full blown Che Guevara on display: Obama 3.0. 

Remember, based on her actual voting record, Harris was one of the most liberal senators of all time -- more liberal than Obama, Biden, Bernie Sanders, and Hillary Clinton. 

My most generous analogy, Democrats remind me of a rebellious teenager who smokes despite his parents' warnings. So one day he comes home to find his father with five packs lined up on the table who says: "start smoking." After a pack and a half, the teenager keels over and says: "okay Dad, I get it, I won't smoke anymore."

We can hope that the Democrats -- at least the sane ones -- have learned their lesson these past four years. Given their sound defeat, hopefully their leaders will now unequivocally reject their toxic agenda and stop smoking.

But so far, by all indications, many have doubled down on dumb. Doubled down on rejecting America's trinity. If anything, some have traded their cigarettes in for crack.

Many of their leaders and pundits blame their messengers: if only Harris and Walz weren't flawed and uninspiring. 

They blame their marketing: if only their outreach was more targeted. 

They blame their timing: if only Harris had more than 107 days. 

They blame their process: if only they had a primary.

They blame Joe Biden: if only he stepped aside earlier.

They even blame their customers: if only the American people weren’t so dumb and deplorable.

They blame everything except the one thing that is fatally flawed: their actual message!

Their message -- their product -- is not just flawed at the margin, it is toxic. It is anti-American. It is what caused the Democrats to lose and will always cause them to lose. It is why even principled liberals like Bill Maher say they are crazy.

Think about it, Democrats. You couldn't beat someone you tried to make into a convicted felon. You couldn't beat someone found liable for sexual abuse. You couldn't beat someone accused of paying off a porn star.

You wanted Donald Trump because after beating him down, you thought he was the only Republican you could possibly beat. Yet you lost -- badly -- because the American people care more about the message than the messenger. Americans saw you destroying our secular trinity, destroying America.

Flawed or not, Donald Trump understands America. He won because he understands and embraces what makes America great. He understands that America and our values are the solution, not the problem. He may be a billionaire, but he's a fighter, not an elitist, and understands the little guy.

Post election, the scary thing is many Democrats' main regret seems only to be that they didn't quite trick or distract enough Americans into voting for them. They're mad they fell short pulling off the con, instead of realizing they're selling a con that if carried to fruition would destroy America's core values.

In this sense, the Democratic Party needs an intervention. It needs to literally be reprogrammed. It needs sincere introspection. It needs to start by rejecting its message -- not its messenger, not its marketing, not its packaging -- but its actual message. Famous Democratic strategist James Carville even railed about this long before the election.

The Democratic Party needs the moderate values of, dare I say, Bill Clinton, not Barack Obama or Bernie Sanders, let alone AOC and the Squad. Some Democrats have stepped up as moderates rejecting the party's far-Left message -- like John Fetterman, Ritchie Torres, and Seth Moulton -- so it will be interesting to see if they are embraced or shunned by the party. 

I view the predicament the Democrats are now in -- a predicament of their own making -- as a win-win for Republicans and the country. The Democrats now have a choice. 

If they double down on dumb -- meaning keep rejecting America's secular trinity and peddling a toxic, leftist platform -- they will keep losing. Alternatively, if they authentically embrace America's trinity, then not only will their party be stronger, but America will be stronger.

Said differently, Democrats now either get on the Trump bus or get run over by it. They either embrace America’s core values or get stomped at the ballot box. Either way, America wins.

Hopefully Democrats have an authentic reawakening, none of which would be possible had Trump won in 2020. Viewed in this light, consider this a 12-year Trump presidency that hopefully reawakens all of America.



X22, And we Know, and more- Dec 21


 

0:00 / 0:00

15 seconds

15 seconds

0:00 / 0:00

15 seconds

15 seconds

0:00 / 0:00

15 seconds

15 seconds

Another Lie About Trump Goes to Die



In the lead-up to the 2024 election, members of the leftist media and their Democratic friends backing Vice President Kamala Harris repeatedly claimed Donald Trump couldn’t be president again because world leaders don’t respect him. 

Wasting no time getting down to business, Trump started issuing tariff threats against a number of countries, including neighboring Canada. 

"On January 20th, as one of my many first Executive Orders, I will sign all necessary documents to charge Mexico and Canada a 25% Tariff on ALL products coming into the United States, and its ridiculous Open Borders," Trump said on Truth Social. 

The remarks prompted Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to hop on a plane from Ottawa to Mar-a-Lago for a meeting, knowing tariffs would crush his economy if he couldn’t make a deal. 

"It is important to understand that Donald Trump, when he makes statements like that, he plans on carrying them out. There's no question about it,” Trudeau said about the trip. 

He left the meeting with a suggestion from Trump that if he couldn’t keep his end of the deal, Canada could become the 51st state. 

“Before nibbling on crab cocktail and slurping down oysters, the issues of tariffs, border security and trade deficits were front and center. According to two people at the table who heard the discussion, Trump, while cordial and welcoming, was very direct when it came to what he wants from his counterpart to the North,” Fox News reported about the details of the meeting. “Paraphrasing the discussion, Trump told Trudeau that Canada has failed the U.S. border by allowing large amounts of drugs and people across the border, including illegal immigrants from over 70 different countries. Sources say Trump became more animated when it came to the U.S. trade deficit with Canada, which he estimated to be more than $100 billion.”

During his recent trip to France for the reopening of Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, dozens of diplomats, officials and heads of state clamored to shake Trump's hand. They also hoped to be caught in press photos in his proximity. 

"The president-elect is in Paris on Saturday not as a punchline but as a guest of honor for the reopening of Notre Dame," the Washington Post reported. 

"Social media users were quick to point out the pomp and circumstance – including a red carpet – that was rolled out for Trump in a way typically reserved for a sitting president," Yahoo News added about the grand event. 

The private sector is also paying attention. 

Days after the Trudeau meeting, Japan’s Softbank CEO Masayoshi Son also made his way to the White House and vowed to bring 100,000 new jobs to the U.S. with a $100 billion investment. 

“My promise is $100 billion, but he's asking to do more! He’s a great negotiator,” Masayoshi said during a live press conference, during which Trump urged him to double the deal. “I would really like to celebrate the great victory of President Trump. And my confidence level in the economy of the United States has tremendously increased with his victory.”

"President Trump is a double-down president," Son continued. "I'm going to have to double down."

All of this and Trump isn’t officially president yet. He is respected on the world stage by both friends and foes. More importantly, he demands foreign leaders respect the hard work and dollars of the American people. 



🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


New J6 Transcript Contradicts Hutchinson’s Claims Trump Went Grand Theft Auto


Lawmakers voted to release testimony previously concealed for contradicting a hyperbolic narrative from the J6 Committee’s star witness.



A House panel reviewing the work of the illegally established and since disbanded Select Committee on Jan. 6 released testimony previously concealed by lawmakers for contradicting the committee’s star witness.

On Thursday, the Washington Times reported the House Administration’s subcommittee on Oversight released the transcripts of a Secret Service driver for President Donald Trump who pushed back on claims Trump tried to violently hijack a presidential vehicle to riot at the Capitol.

“I did not see him reach. He never grabbed the steering wheel,” the driver told then-Committee Vice Chair Liz Cheney during an interview. “I didn’t see him, you know, lunge to try to get into the front seat at all.”

The agent’s testimony flew directly in opposition to what lawmakers were told by Cassidy Hutchinson, a former White House aide who worked for Trump’s final first-term chief of staff, Mark Meadows. Hutchinson sensationalized the televised show trials of the Jan. 6 Committee when she claimed an “irate” president assaulted Secret Service agents to try to drive himself to Capitol Hill.

“The president said something to the effect of ‘I’m the f’ing president, take me up to the Capitol now,'” Hutchinson publicly testified in the summer of 2022. “The president reached up towards the front of the vehicle to grab at the steering wheel,” she added, but he was stopped by the head of his security detail.

According to the Washington Times reporting on the newly unveiled transcript, the Secret Service driver said, “What stood out was the irritation in [Mr. Trump’s] voice more than his physical presence, which would have been pretty obvious if he was trying to insert himself between the two front seats.”

Hutchinson was immediately contradicted by the same sources she cited in her public congressional hearing, but she was celebrated by Trump’s opponents as a heroine of the Jan. 6 saga to smear Republicans as complicit in the violence at the Capitol. Lawmakers on the partisan panel appointed by then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi aggressively pursued that narrative to the point of releasing select testimony and riot footage with a series of made-for-TV hearings produced by professional broadcasters.

In March, The Federalist reported Cheney suppressed evidence that Trump pressed Democrats to accept 10,000 National Guard troops ahead of Jan. 6, 2021. Former Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato told the Select Committee of conversations he heard between White House officials and Democrat leaders wherein Trump himself suggested the pre-emptive reinforcements to guard the Capitol. Democrats, however, refused federal troops in the capital while officials in the Pentagon deliberately resisted Trump’s orders related to preparations for the National Guard. Ornato’s transcript with the committee, however, was kept under seal while Democrats on the panel worked to undermine his credibility.

New details of the Defense Department’s insubordination were reported in House Republicans’ nearly 130-page interim report released Tuesday, in which investigators also called for the Justice Department to conduct a criminal investigation of Cheney. The report calls on the FBI to probe whether Cheney should be criminally culpable for witness tampering over backdoor communications with Hutchinson to circumvent attorney Stefan Passantino, who represented Hutchinson before she changed her testimony.

The Jan. 6 Committee then colluded with allied news outlets to frame Passantino’s representation as nefarious and targeted his law license. Passantino was cleared of misconduct following multiple investigations and has since filed his own bar complaint against Cheney in addition to a $67 million lawsuit against the federal government. The two cases are currently the only open opportunities for court discovery into the disgraced ex-congresswoman’s conduct.



The Five Words Tweeted by Elon Musk That Have the Global Elite Reaching for Their Smelling Salts


Teri Christoph reporting for RedState 

Elon Musk has done it again.

Fresh off of tweeting the original Continuing Resolution (CR) into oblivion, Musk has now set his sights on Europe, and what he tweeted about Germany has the international community of leftists retreating to their fainting couches and calling Jeeves to bring the smelling salts.

In response to a video posted to X by Naomi Seibt—a young German YouTuber who is known as the "anti-Greta Thunberg"—in which Seibt calls out Germany's presumptive chancellor Friedrich Merz for not wanting to work with the "Germany First" AfD party, Musk tweeted out five words:

Well, you would have thought he had called for Christmas and Kwanzaa to be canceled and all the gifts to be given to Jewish children based on the tantrums thrown by globalists everywhere. Here's a taste of some worldwide headlines:

  • "Outrage as Elon Musk claims ‘only AfD can save Germany’" (The Guardian)
  • "Backlash builds as Elon Musk endorses Germany’s far right" (Politico EU)
  • "Anger after Musk backs German far right" (France 24)
  • Musk Pauses Torment of GOP to Praise German Extremists (New York Magazine)

They are big, big mad. 

The propagandists at NBC had this to say about the endorsement:

Elon Musk waded into Germany’s election Friday, expressing his support for a far-right anti-immigrant and anti-Islam party that's being monitored by the country’s domestic intelligence agency.

Sounds like Germany has its very own Deep State, doesn't it?

Let's take a closer look at what Musk is actually endorsing here. Is AfD (Alternative für Deutschland) the second coming of Adolph Hitler (not that the modern-day left would have a problem with that based on their unabashed support of Hamas)?

Here's how AfD describes itself on its official website, under the headline, "COURAGE FOR GERMANY. FREE CITIZENS, NOT SUBJECTS":

We are liberals and conservatives. We are free citizens of our country. We are convinced democrats.

And what does AfD stand for?

As free citizens, we stand up for direct democracy, the separation of powers and the rule of law, the social market economy, subsidiarity, federalism, the family and the living tradition of German culture. Because democracy and freedom are based on shared cultural values and historical memories. In the tradition of the two revolutions of 1848 and 1989, with our civil protest we articulate the will to complete national unity in freedom and to create a Europe of sovereign democratic states that are bound together in peace, self-determination and good neighborliness.

We are committed to fundamentally renewing our country in the spirit of freedom and democracy and to restoring these principles. We are open to the world, but we want to be and remain German. We want to permanently preserve human dignity, the family with children, our Western Christian culture, our language and tradition in a peaceful, democratic and sovereign nation state of the German people.

AfD is basically as close to a Germanic MAGA movement as you're going to get. They are Europeans, though, so not as MAGA as they could be, but still, the most promising party to save the country with the largest economy in Europe. You'll notice that the attacks against AfD are the same exact attacks that they've been leveling against Donald Trump for years, and look where that's gotten them.

The worldwide left is running scared at Donald Trump's looming second term, Elon Musk's growing political influence, and the rise of hardline conservative politicians like Giorgia Meloni and Marine LePen. European governments are collapsing at a regular rate, yet the left keeps pushing the same propaganda that saw them soundly defeated in the U.S. on November 5th.

Germany is expected to vote on February 23 to replace the leftist government led by Chancellor Olaf Scholz that collapsed earlier this week.



Court Records Blow Holes In The New York Times’ Latest Anti-Hegseth Smear


Court records and documents show there’s far more to the story than the Times lets on.



The New York Times recently dropped its latest “bombshell scandal” involving President-elect Donald Trump’s defense secretary nominee Pete Hegseth — and it’s about as vapid and toothless as one would expect.

“They’re desperately searching for anything to malign Pete,” Hegseth’s lawyer Tim Parlatore told The Federalist.

Published on Monday by Times lackies Dave Philipps and Sharon LaFraniere, the hit piece takes aim at Hegseth’s security guard John Jacob Hasenbein, a former Army Special Forces master sergeant. Specifically, the left-wing propagandists detailed a prior Army training incident involving Hasenbein that they ominously characterize as “a dark episode in his past.”

The matter came about during a March 2019 training simulation the Army conducted with a private contractor before Hasenbein’s unit was set to deploy overseas. The master sergeant and his team were tasked with carrying out “a hostage rescue from a terrorist cell,” and the contractor hired a civilian role player to portray “an ISIS fighter with information about a hostage whom Mr. Hasenbein’s team was supposed to free,” according to the Times.

Philipps and LaFraniere cited claims from witnesses that Hasenbein “beat” the role player — including the role player himself, who told the Times the soldiers “were supposed to ask [him] where the hostage is at … But they didn’t give [him] a chance. They just started hurting [him] bad.”

The authors noted how Hasenbein was subsequently charged by the Army with aggravated assault and reckless endangerment. As described in the report, “A military jury found him guilty of the assault charge in a court-martial in 2020 … But the judge overseeing the case declared a mistrial after learning that a friend of Mr. Hasenbein had been talking to a juror throughout the trial.” 

While the left-wing activists portray the matter as an open and shut case, court records and documents obtained by The Federalist show there’s far more to the story than the Times lets on.

Unlawful Command Influence

One of the most glaring pieces of information omitted from Philipps and LaFraniere’s hit piece is testimony from two witnesses of the incident and examination of Hasenbein’s claim, as summarized by the authors, “that a commander had pressured [these] two soldiers to change their statements that nothing wrong had happened during the episode.”

According to the court overseeing the case, Master Sergeant Daniel Ewald and Sergeant First Class Brent Bacon were interviewed about the training incident in April 2019 by Captain Thomas Krakowiak, who “was appointed as an Investigating Officer (IO) … to determine the facts and circumstances surrounding the alleged injury.” Krakowiak showed both troops a three-minute video of the incident “recorded with night vision equipment.”

Ewald testified “that the video did not influence his recollection of the events, and that at the time he witnessed the incident, he believed he did nothing wrong, and no one else (including [Hasenbein]) did anything wrong.” Bacon similarly said he “believed no one did anything wrong during the exercise (to include [Hasenbein]),” and noted that “he specifically recalled that the only people saying the ‘safe word'” training participants were given to pause the exercise to address potential safety concerns “were Americans who were asking the role player whether he wanted to say the safe word.”

In September 2019, the General Court-Martial Convening Authority (GCMCA) — who referred Hasenbein’s case to trial — issued General Officer Memoranda of Record (GOMOR) to Ewald and Bacon. According to the Army, these memoranda are letters of reprimand “written by a general officer concerning a Soldier under his or her command” and come in two classifications: local and permanent.

A locally filed GOMOR “can be seen by the Soldier’s chain of command, but not by a promotion board, and it will be removed after a change of duty station or after 3 years, whichever is sooner.” Meanwhile, a permanently filed GOMOR can be viewed by promotion boards and will remain on a soldier’s record “unless it is appealed for removal or transferred to the restricted portion of the [Army Military Human Resource Record].”

In its GOMOR, the Convening Authority accused Ewald and Bacon of “fail[ing] to intervene when a fellow team member assaulted a civilian role-player who was not wearing any protective gear,” “misrepresent[ing] [their] actions and the role-player’s use of the safe-word and plea for help,” and “stat[ing] the role-player never used the safe word, even though you knew that to be false, and fail[ing] to state the role-player expressed distress during the assault.”

The following month, Ewald and Bacon issued rebuttals accepting responsibility for allegedly failing to intervene to stop the training exercise. According to the court, both did so, in part, to avoid potential permanent memoranda filings that harm their respective careers.

In a Feb. 27, 2020, ruling, Judge Jacqueline Tubbs found that Ewald’s rebuttal “was shaped by the GCMCA’s reprimand,” and that “[h]e believed the GCMCA expected him to take responsibility for the conduct in the GOMOR.” She similarly noted how “[p]art of the reason [Bacon] accepted responsibility was out of fear of receiving a permanent filing if he did not do so.”

Tubbs ultimately determined that Hasenbein met his “burden of providing evidence that [unlawful command influence] UCI occurred,” and that the Convening Authority’s “action of initiating GOMORs to two key-eyewitnesses … created the appearance of unlawful command influence” that risks jeopardizing the fairness of the trial.

“The Government failed to prove that the actions of the GCMCA would not prejudice the proceedings or place an intolerable strain on the military justice system by casting a significant doubt about the fairness of the proceedings,” Tubbs wrote. “His actions will have, and create the appearance of having, an impermissible effect on the witnesses’ testimony and the trial, and therefore constitute actual and apparent unlawful command influence.”

Tubbs prohibited the government from further cross-examining Ewald and Bacon and “calling any witness to attack [their] credibility.” She also barred the government from “introducing any evidence” regarding the memoranda issued to the two soldiers, “information contained in the rebuttal matters of either Soldier, or evidence that either witness ‘accepted responsibility’ for their action or inaction in the incident.”

While Tubbs denied Hasenbein’s motion to toss the charges based on the UCI, she ordered that he receive “latitude in any witnesses that are called” and disqualified the Convening Authority “from taking post-trial action in this case.”

Mistrial and Aftermath

Those weren’t the only facts Philipps and LaFraniere left out of their hit piece, however. The authors also neglected to provide concrete information about the mistrial resulting in the dismissal of Hasenbein’s aggravated assault charge.

In her April 9, 2020, decision, Tubbs revealed how one of the jurors, Command Sergeant Major Toby Kammer, violated court rules by “communicating with” a fellow military official about the case.

The court found that Kammer called Master Sergeant Clyde Whitmore — a friend of Hasenbein and Kammer — “at least twice prior to deliberations on findings, and again after the sentence was announced and court adjourned” with the knowledge that Whitmore knew Hasenbein. Kammer asked Whitmore “for his opinion on evidence that was presented” at trial and informed him “about the panel’s impressions of the Defense’s expert witness,” who argued that Hasenbein’s “use of knee strikes” during the training exercise “was reasonable.”

“[I]t sounds like it’s pretty normal to get real aggressive for you guys and train like you fight,” Kammer told Whitmore.

Whitmore also told Kammer that “they [the Accused and members of his team] were told to be more aggressive” prior to the training exercise and that he’s “been doing that same kind of training where we were told to be more aggressive and [he] took it very personal,” and “that’s what you strive for … being the most violent dude in the room.”

Tubbs noted how, “[e]ven though there is no evidence that CSM Kammer brought up the discussions he was having, or the extraneous information he was receiving, with the other [jurors], that extraneous information clearly impacted his deliberations” on the matter. “The actions of CSM Kammer, cast substantial doubt as to the fairness of the proceedings and placed an intolerable strain on the entire military justice system,” she wrote.

In their article, Philipps and LaFraniere incorrectly attributed Kammer’s “pretty normal” remark to Whitmore and did not quote from Tubbs’ explanation of how Kammer’s conduct jeopardized the fairness of the trial.

Hasenbein filed a defamation case against the military contractor who conducted the training simulation in December 2020, in which he claimed, as the Times described, “he was effectively forced out of the military because of false and misleading statements by employees of the independent contractor who conducted the exercise.” Hasenbein dropped the case after the two parties reached a settlement in September 2021.

The master sergeant retired from active duty and was honorably discharged in October 2021, according to his DD214 and other documents obtained by The Federalist.

“You spend your entire adult life devoted to this way of life and [the military], and to have it not only turn its back on you, but [to] actively try to destroy you, it’s disheartening,” Parlatore said of Hasenbein’s decision to retire.

Hegseth’s lawyer further noted how “even if you’re exonerated” like Hasenbein was, “the ability to get promoted is a little bit more difficult.”

Media Smear Campaign

Parlatore told The Federalist the Times’ latest hatchet job against Hasenbein — and by default, Hegseth — is demonstrative of how the media’s attempts to derail the latter’s defense secretary nomination have failed.

The Times published a hit piece last month authored by LaFraniere and Julie Tate that included a private 2018 email from Hegseth’s mother Penelope to her son about his prior extramarital affairs. While critical of Hegseth in the reported email, Penelope told the outlet she sent a follow-up email apologizing for the initial communique that she wrote “in anger [and] with emotion.”

Penelope more recently appeared on Fox News to defend her son and his character amid the media’s smear campaign.

The media have a “bizarre desire to try to find anything that can, in any way, be painted as negative about somebody [like Pete]. It’s just straight up mudslinging,” Parlatore said.

NBC News and The New Yorker are among those to partake in the Times’ anti-Hegseth crusade. Earlier this month, both left-wing outlets published anonymous allegations of wrongdoing by Hegseth during his time working at Fox News and spearheading veteran-related nonprofit organizations, respectively. Numerous former colleagues and associates have come out strongly disputing the accusations.



More Catwalk Than Perp Walk as Deification of Luigi Mangione Is Ascending to Absurd Heights

 Move over Billy the Kid, Bonnie and Clyde, Butch and Sundance …


Luigi Mangione, alleged killer of UnitedHealthcare’s CEO, Brian Thompson, is being deified by fans comparing him to everyone from Robin Hood to Jesus Christ. His arrival in Manhattan, courtesy of the NYPD, is the latest made-for-TV moment in his leap from obscurity.

Mr. Mangione arrived in New York City on Thursday to face charges including first-degree murder, stalking, and illegal use of firearms. After 10 days in a Pennsylvania jail, he waived his right to contest extradition, enabling Empire State authorities to transport him to the scene of the crime.

Although he arrived for a perp walk, Mr. Mangione’s appearance was choreographed as if he were a supermodel on the catwalk. NBC News leaned into his supposed charms, describing him as “clean-cut … wearing beige slacks and a white shirt under a black V-neck.”

The avatar of an X account called Luigi Nation. Via X

CNN recounted the 26-year-old’s “busy Thursday,” noting that it featured a “whirlwind, two-state courthouse tour turned spectacle.” He had a trip “featuring a helicopter ride” and “a throng of escorts, including the mayor of New York City,” all showing up as if welcoming a pope.

“NYPD apparently sat around asking themselves,” the editor of Current Affairs, Nathan Robinson, posted on X, “how can we arrange to transport Mangione in a way that makes him look to his supporters like Christ being taken to the cross?”

The religious iconography is fitting for a man cast as a martyr by those on a jihad against America’s health care system. On X, a reporter for WMAR-2 News at Baltimore, Elizabeth Worthington, shared a picture she spotted showing Mr. Mangione’s face Photoshopped onto Christ’s body.

Ms. Worthington snapped the blasphemous iconography, complete with sacred heart, at Vito’s, a pizza shop at Townson, Maryland, Mr. Mangione’s home state. On X, this canonization is in full swing and growing, as if killing a health care CEO counts as the two miracles required for Catholic sainthood.

“Petition St. Luigi,” one person posted on X, “when you get an unexpected medical bill.” Another image showed Mr. Mangione’s face superimposed onto the Bat Signal, which the citizens of Gotham City shone into the night sky to summon their antihero.

A post on X compares Luigi Mangione’s arrest to that of Superman. Via X

Mr. Mangione’s cult of personality is aided and abetted by the Internet, spread by #Luigi. When it was reported that “deny,” “defend” and “depose” were written on shell casings near the site of Thompson’s murder, the slogan began springing up in posts and on products.

“Delay Deny Defend” is a 2010 book criticizing the health insurance industry, a title said to summarize the industry’s tactics for denying claims. Amazon yanked merchandise featuring the trinity of words, but the book became an instant best-seller.

In years past, the faces of those charged with crimes were unknown to the public and so not mooned over like Mr. Mangione’s. There might be drawings from a trial but never cameras in courtrooms; TV and newspaper images were crude. Plus, there was no incentive to play PR for perps.

The accused, back then, were transported in secret using unmarked with tinted windows. Certainly, the NYPD wouldn’t welcome the press to snap glamor shots of those in their custody. The police would also allow those in cuffs to cover their faces with a jacket or shirt as it helped avoid a circus.

An X user posts artwork dedicated to the suspected killer. Via X.

The country artist who performed the theme to “The Dukes of Hazzard,” Waylon Jennings, includes a line about this tradition in that song, “Good Ol’ Boys.” While his mother loves him, he sings, “she don’t understand” why “they keep a showin’ my hands and not my face on TV.”

A quiet arrival also avoids inspiring copycats or risking a repeat of the nightclub owner, Jack Ruby, who shot the man who assassinated President Kennedy, Lee Harvey Oswald. But for Mr. Mangione, that cat is out of the bag. Many in the public know his face and his cause, and they like what they see.

John Brown. Billy the Kid. Bonnie and Clyde. Butch and Sundance. Every few generations, America’s rage against the system coughs up a folk hero. Mr. Mangione may soon join that rogue’s gallery — claimed as a secular saint who fired the shot heard ‘round the Internet.

https://www.nysun.com/article/more-catwalk-than-perp-walk-as-deification-of-mangione-is-ascending-to-absurd-heights