Sunday, December 15, 2024

The Great Drone Scam


Let me begin with a phrase I never used to start a story in 45 years as a TV reporter: “I may be wrong.” This entire piece may be wrong, but those 45 years on the air and 2000+ hours as a pilot tell me I’m right. The MSM floods their newscasts with reports of drone-terrified citizens ready to head for the hills over the latest media-induced scare. The word “drones” is now synonymous with “doom.” This is simply a media-driven scam. The MSM media is searching for something, anything, to boost ratings since their failure to ensure the election of the woman they considered God’s chosen presidential candidate. One man now claims 50 drones came from the Atlantic and chased him. He got his time on TV and didn’t even have to pay Oprah $2.5 mil. I wonder if he has also seen Sasquatch.

There are two types of media-hyped drones. The first are the small ones. They fly in groups. No, they are not some super top-secret American, Russian, Chinese, Iranian, or North Korean weapon. They are the same drones you can watch fly together on any given Sunday in hundreds of public parks. If you want to join the fun, it starts at about $49.00 on Amazon. These radio-controlled drones can fly for as long as an hour on a battery charge. They fly in any direction displaying the supposedly mysterious lights seen on television. Piloting skills come easily -- it takes about 45 minutes to become familiar with flying one. 

These drones have a camera relaying the sights from the sky back to the operator on the ground. For those non-pilots who always wanted a bird’s-eye view of their neighborhood from 400 feet, drones are a cheap alternative to spending $20K to get a pilot’s license. 

They also have a nefarious purpose if the operator is so inclined. FAA rules prohibit flying at night, but since when have teenage boys followed the rules when there is a chance to see a scantily-clad woman? The Biden administration declares these boys have the right to go into girls’ bathrooms and locker rooms at your local junior high, so why not use technology to have even more fun?

Drone owners soon discovered they could fly at night near apartment buildings. Not everyone closes their curtains. Soon, word got out that Mrs. Sushbaum in 7B puts on a great show every night. Boys will be boys, and teenage testosterone and high-tech hobby drones floating outside apartments’ open curtain windows quickly created scandalous photos floating over the ‘net.

If anyone doubts that drones can fly in formation at night and create spectacular sights, check out the Super Bowl Show

The claim that these small drones are gathering secret intelligence is ridiculous: 95% of the sightings are in airspace with no restrictions. Any aircraft, from a kid’s drone to a 747, can fly over most of America 24/365 and take all the pictures they want. There are Restricted and Prohibited airspaces, such as around airports, D.C., and some military bases, but 95% of American airspace is a free-flight zone. Add to that military photo satellites, and it’s obvious there is no tactical value to these drone overflights. If the Iranian Revolutionary Guard wants photos of American facilities, in most cases, they can take their camera to a local airport, charter a small four-seat Cessna, and snap all the pictures they want. If those saboteurs wanted to save money, they could wait until most bases hold their annual open house and take hundreds of photos. 

There has been much said that these drones are flying around military bases. In reality, they fly everywhere. They fly near military bases because the kids know that will get them the most attention. Much was said about drones flying over Picatinny Arsenal in New Jersey. If anyone thinks there are secrets to be seen there, this is what Picatinny looks like.

Simply put, it drone owners having a great time putting one over on the Great Unwashed.

But what about the big drones? Some are described as bigger than a bus, and they even make a lot of noise. There is a highly classified Double Double Top Secret name for such flying objects. The huge ones are called “airliners.” It’s easy to tell the difference between airlines and commercial helicopters. Airliners make “WooooSHHHH” sounds. Rotating helicopter blades go “Wakka-Wakka-Wakka.”

One example of this foolishness was broadcast far and wide this week. It showed an object in the sky over northern New Jersey. It flew in a straight line, low, slow, and loud. It was headed directly for Newark Airport. It had two red lights, a green light, and a white light. So does every airliner. We pilots love those lights. They are a great help when trying to avoid hitting other airplanes. 

The flashing red light in the center is the 360-degree beacon on the bottom of the fuselage. The steady red light is on the left wingtip, and the green is on the right. The white light is on the tail, facing rearward. This light pattern, used by airplanes flying every night in the world, has its history in nautical navigation. Coast Guard regulations have mandated a green light to starboard, a red light to port, and a white stern light on most boats for more than 100 years. 

Some of the pictures captured by the panicking public also show two bright bulbs lighting what appears to be a large tube at the front of these feared flying machines. Those are the landing lights illuminating the forward half of the fuselage. 

Observers also claim these “huge drones” make a lot of noise. They are correct. Jet engines are thunderous.

If you doubt the above, print a picture of one of these supposedly terrifying objects from the internet. Then go out to your local airport. Park about half a mile outside the airport fence under the landing airplanes. When it gets really loud, look up. 

It should not surprise anyone that these “sightings” are occurring in New Jersey. In Orson Welle’s “War of the Worlds” Halloween night radio hoax, the Martians landed in that state’s Grovers Mills in 1938. Everyone was terrified by the Welle’s network radio hoax. Some things never change.

There are certainly viable sightings that even military pilots cannot explain, but that’s not what drives the current media mayhem. It’s all about saying anything to get ratings. 

Finally, to turn the whole thing into a complete farce, Congressman Van Drew now claims these mystery drones were launched from an Iranian mystery ship parked in the Atlantic. It's too bad that no one can find this ship during the day.

Maybe it is Martians, Russians, Iranians, or Lord knows who. If it is, they sure traveled a long way to see Mrs. Sushbaum in her birthday suit.



X22, And we Know, and more- Dec 15

 




0:00 / 0:00

15 seconds

15 seconds

0:00 / 0:00

15 seconds

15 seconds

0:00 / 0:00

15 seconds

15 seconds

0:00 / 0:00

15 seconds

15 seconds

0:00 / 0:00

15 seconds

15 seconds

Donald Trump Reshaping the World at Record Pace


When the startling news broke on Thursday that China’s President Xi Jinping had accepted an invitation from President-elect Donald J. Trump to attend Trump’s Inauguration on January 20th, it barely moved the needle in America’s newsrooms…because it was only a small blip on the worldwide radar screens monitoring Trump’s pending return to the White House.

In just the past few days, our 45th—and soon to be 47th—President has received calls from foreign leaders…saw Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau grovel before him at Mar-A-Lago on tariff issues…rang the Opening Bell at the New York Stock Exchange and was featured on the cover of TIME Magazine as its “Person Of The Year” (infuriating lefty kooks including occasional cable personality Don Lemon and MSNBC’s #1 Trump-basher Nicolle Wallace. You might include them in your prayers and maybe gift them with bottles of smelling salts since January 20th is still several weeks away.)

Meantime, incoming Cabinet picks like Secretary of Defense-designate Pete Hegseth and Trump’s nominee to head the FBI Kash Patel appear to have weathered the legacy media-generated “controversy” over their nominations and may be on glide paths to fairly easy confirmations. Current FBI director Christopher Wray can read the tea leaves: after what he called “weeks of careful thought” he announced this week he’s resigning at the end of the Biden administration “to avoid dragging the bureau deeper into the fray” of politics. A/k/a being walked out the door with his personal items in a banker’s box by Donald Trump.

Yes, the old elections-have-consequences bromide is also playing out on Capitol Hill. On the Salem Media Group weekly news program “This Week On The Hill with Tony Perkins,” U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson applauded bipartisan House passage of the Fiscal 2025 National Defense Appropriations Act. Johnson noted this NDAA reflects the fact that there’s a new sheriff in town, adding “One of the things we were really focused on was to return the emphasis of our nation defense policy to just that: national defense.”

The “woke” agenda of the Biden years was stripped out of the NDAA. Speaker Johnson reports that “We took out a lot of the progressive agenda so it is not part of Defense policy going forward. For the first time in federal law, for example, we will be preventing taxpayer funding of Trans surgery on minors. We wanted to assure that no tax dollars are devoted to experimental, non scientific nonsense such as gender affirming care as they call it…which would cause dramatic, permanent harm to these young people.”

Additionally, Johnson says Congress is rooting out DEI and “woke” directives introduced under Biden from America’s military academies…and the NDAA includes the largest pay increase in many years for military members—14%—which the Speaker concedes was long overdue and will positively impact military families.

On the world stage, as well, Donald Trump continues to be blessed by events which are teeing-up potential foreign policy successes early on in his new term in the White House. The fall of Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad has rearranged the deck chairs on the Titanic that is Iran.  On “This Week On The  Hill,” former Trump administration national security advisor John Bolton says America stands to benefit from this game changing event. “The effect, largely attributable to Israel’s determination to defeat terrorists worldwide, has given the United States this opportunity,” Bolton declares. “It’s given us a big chance to get fundamental change in the MIddle East for the benefit of ourselves, the Israelis, our Arab friends and the region.” (Even as Bolton was appearing on “This Week,” Israeli jets were surgically taking out targets in Syria including destroying what was left of Assad’s navy, and the mad scramble is on to find the former dictator’s cache of chemical weapons.)

Suffice it to say Assad’s sudden flight out of Syria was only eclipsed by the chaotic American withdrawal from Afghanistan under the careful tutelage of Joe Biden.

Back home in the USA, Alvin Bragg—the Manhattan DA whose creative lawfare and kangaroo court tactics helped “convict” Donald Trump—tried and failed (twice in 72 hours, which was a neat trick) to convince a jury that subway hero  Daniel Penny should go to prison for stopping a homeless mental patient from potentially assaulting fellow straphangers; Penny’s physical restraint of the man unfortunately resulted in his death.  Bragg suggested Penny was guilty of manslaughter (which resulted in a deadlocked jury) so he quickly pivoted to “criminally negligent homicide.” That sent jurors on the legal equivalent of a ride on the roller coaster at Six Flags Over America, but in the end they gave thumbs-down to that charge, as well. CNN, MSNBC, and The Washington Post immediately cried crocodile tears with thinly-veiled suggestions that Penny’s freedom will unleash “vigilantes” on the streets of major cities. (The Post editorial board even hysterically rolled out the visage of 1980’s “subway vigilante” Benie Goetz who shot assailants that threatened him with a screwdriver as he rode home.)

Throw in bizarre “large drones” the size of VW buses appearing over New Jersey and elsewhere, whose origins or intent are unknown but which the mercifully soon-to-end Biden administration quickly dismissed as “not a public threat” (huh?) and it is safe to say our so-called “national leadership” has never been more embarrassing or anemic.

With all this as the backdrop, Donald Trump stands to inherit command of a nation which desperately needs him to make good on the one promise that has been his mantra since he officially entered politics. We need him to—wait for it—Make America Great Again.

He’s not even inaugurated yet, but he’s already beginning to deliver on that pledge. It is comforting to know that the grownups are about to return to the White House.



20 (or So) Obvious Questions about January 6


Even before Donald Trump ascends to the presidency on January 20, his appointees should ask themselves the questions that follow — all of them simple and straightforward.  With Christopher Wray stepping down from the FBI directorship, they will have a much better chance of getting straight answers quickly.

Trump’s team should then share those answers widely.  This information will make President Trump’s pardon of more than 1,500 Americans much more comprehensible to the American public and much less controversial.

–Although now the FBI admits to having 26 confidential human sources in the crowd on January 6, how many total “assets” did the FBI and other entities plant, and what roles did they play?

–For what entity was Ray Epps working and under what terms?

–Who planted the pipe bombs outside the DNC and near the RNC headquarters?

–Who instructed Kamala Harris to conceal the fact that she was at the DNC when the bomb was found and why?

–Why did Harris allow hundreds of J6ers to be prosecuted for threatening her designated space at the Capitol when she wasn’t at the Capitol?

–Who were the “two law enforcement officials” who told the New York Times that pro-Trump rioters” fatally struck Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick with a fire extinguisher, inflicting “a bloody gash in his head”?

–Who orchestrated the 100-day-plus suppression of Sicknick’s autopsy report?

–If Sicknick was not murdered, as the DOJ finally conceded, why did a federal judge give Julian Khater an 80-month prison sentence for spritzing Sicknick with an over-the-counter pepper spray?

–Has there been an official inquiry into the subsequent suicide deaths of four USCP officers, and if not, why has the DOJ routinely blamed the J6ers for causing those deaths?

–Why was there no crime scene investigation in the likely homicide of Rosanne Boyland?

–Who chose to ignore the obvious video evidence of Boyland being suffocated as a result of a police action and to falsely blame her death on an amphetamine overdose?

–Who suppressed the Boyland autopsy report for 90 days and stonewalled her family at every turn?

–Why was Lila Morris, the Metropolitan P.D. officer caught on video repeatedly bashing the unconscious Boyland over the head with a tree branch, not even disciplined?

–Why was Metropolitan P.D. lieutenant Jason Bagshaw promoted despite having been caught on video bashing the defenseless Victoria White bloody?

–Why did the DOJ not interview the eyewitnesses to the shooting death of Ashli Babbitt?

–Why did the USCP coddle and promote Babbitt’s killer, Michael Byrd, despite a shooting that, according to use-of-force expert Stan Kephart, “violated not only the law but his oath”?

–Who ordered the “shock and awe” raids on the homes of hundreds of non-violent protesters and why?

–Why has the so-called “Scaffold Commander” not been arrested despite multiple clear images of his face?

–Why has the man who constructed the mock gallows on the Capitol grounds not been arrested despite multiple clear images of his face?

–Why did the USCP allow the gallows to stand unmolested on Capitol grounds for more than four hours before the crowds gathered?

–Why was Emanuel Jackson quickly set free despite having been caught on video swinging a baseball bat at police officers over a two-hour period?

–If there was no insurrection, as the DOJ conceded, why were the sentences given to the J6ers so much more severe than the $30–50 fines given to the protesters who physically obstructed the Kavanaugh hearings?

These are the simple questions, the ones off the top.  I am sure readers will think of others I may have overlooked.  To be sure, more probing questions need to be asked about the January 6 Select Committee report as well as the charging documents for the J6ers.

Having read through much of this material, I am impressed by how casually — and routinely — our elected officials and federal jurists distort the facts to protect the party line.  In short, they lie, and some have done so under oath.

I am impressed, too, by the shamelessness of a DOJ that can boast of its success rate in securing convictions, knowing that the accused were allowed no change of venue and faced juries pulled from a pool 95 percent anti-Trump.  This needs to change.

More questions need to be asked as well about the security failures at all levels on January 6.  In his otherwise worthy book, Government Gangsters, Kash Patel more or less exonerates the Pentagon.  He should not have.  Incompetence explains much of what went wrong on January 6, but so does treason.

Nearly 1,600 American citizens were arrested for exercising their First Amendment rights on January 6, and roughly half of them have been incarcerated.  Save for the insurrectionists among them — if there were any — the rest deserve not just commutation of their sentences, but a full pardon.  Many may deserve compensation.  And all deserve the truth.



🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


President Trump Reveals “Outside Govt – President’s Intelligence Advisory Board” Headed by Chairman Devin Nunes



President Donald Trump has revealed something very important to those who fully understand the nature and construct of the DC Silo system. An outside government “Intelligence Advisory Board,” perhaps the ultimate cross-silo information system.

[SOURCE]

The approach of an Intelligence Advisory Board has the possibility to fracture the mechanism used by the DC Intelligence Community to isolate the president.

Within the various intel agencies, they use a process of building silos of information that are not shared outside the origination agency unless certain rules are followed.  This is a mechanism to retain control.

One of these control mechanisms is found in the classification process.  Each agency (colloquially called a ‘stakeholder’) has unilateral control over their unique contribution to a collective document or intelligence product.  Unless every stakeholder agrees to the declassification, the intel product is withheld and remains “siloed”.  That’s just one example, there are hundreds more.

An Intelligence Advisory Board is essentially the Bullshit Calling Committee, that can help the President determine which parts of the intelligence information are factually likely and which parts are transparently political.

NOVEMBER 14th REMINDER:

Almost every day an intelligence community overview assessment is compiled, it’s called the Presidential Daily Briefing or PDB.

The PDB contains content primarily produced by the CIA.  However, in the modern era, the PDB is assembled and enhanced by adding information from other intelligence agencies (silos).  The Director of National Intelligence assembles it; the position Tulsi Gabbard has recently been nominated for.

The DNI (now Tulsi) compiles the information, then delivers the PDB to the President, the National Security Advisor (now Mike Waltz) and the list of people assigned by the President to review it.

The PDB is the Intelligence Community (IC) telling the Office of the President, this is what’s going on.  The PDB frames the worldview of the CIA and other agencies.

However, if the CIA/IC wants to frame policy and action to their agenda – and not to the agenda of the president/administration per se’ – the CIA/IC can shape the PDB information toward their own individual objectives. In the past several decades the CIA manipulation of the PDB became obvious.

Because the PDB was no longer considered to be an “independent” finding of fact, and was/is, instead, more of a CIA tool to shape and control the president, it became increasingly useless.

President Obama saw the traps within the CIA/IC use of the PDB and started to ignore it. Obama gave the PDB to almost two-dozen administration officials daily, essentially saying, “here this is what the CIA say is going on – check it out.” Meanwhile Obama did what he wanted to do in shaping policy, often regardless of the PDB content.

With an incoming President Trump administration, the CIA/IC use of the PDB to manipulate outcomes will be even more on display.

With that in mind, here’s one approach that might be worth considering.

Make the CIA/IC (now Ratcliffe/Tulsi) provide a footnote for every assertion of fact within the PDB.

Put the footnotes into a classified appendix that includes sources and methods and give the appendix only to the National Security Advisor, now Mike Waltz.  [ie. ‘Review and return’]

Let NSA Mike Waltz then review the attributions of source material in the White House SCIF. Then, if any concerns are noted, Waltz can turn to the National Security Council with a generalized statement describing the concern saying, “check this out.”

The NSC can then dig into the granular details and return with their own independent assessment about the validity of the information.

The National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz, can then go question the specific CIA/IC silo about any contradiction that might be at issue.

Do this enough times, and I predict the PDB will quickly change in both tone and content. The originators of the intelligence assessment, the CIA and other agencies, will be on notice that their homework is being checked by the National Security Council.

…. Or maybe, the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board!

Just a thought.



Harvard President Privately Concedes University Must 'Rethink Messaging' After Trump Win


Mike Miller reporting for RedState 

In this episode of "The No-Longer-Hallowed Halls of Academia"...

In a bit of a surprise move, Harvard University president Alan M. Garber reportedly told faculty members in a closed meeting that they need to rethink their messaging following President-elect Donald Trump's decisive win in the 2024 general election, which also saw multiple down-ballot GOP wins, resulting into regaining control of the Senate and retaining the House.

Translation: Garber reads the writing on the wall.

Garber reportedly described his take on the post-election mood in Washington, D.C., which he said was the greatest threat to the university in recent memory, the Harvard Crimson reported (emphasis, mine).  

At the FAS [Faculty of Arts and Sciences] meeting on Dec. 3, Garber said he met with roughly 40 members of Congress during six trips to Washington since becoming [Harvard] president. Garber said he emerged from the conversations convinced there was bipartisan frustration with Harvard and acknowledged that he believes the criticisms contain elements of truth.

Garber’s remarks — among his first since President-elect Donald Trump won a second term in the White House — suggest Harvard’s leaders are reevaluating their public messaging in the face of an increasingly hostile climate in Washington.

During his remarks, Garber said that the University’s communications strategy has not worked as well as its leaders had thought.

Details of the meeting were relayed to The Crimson by three faculty attendees who were granted anonymity to describe Garber’s private remarks to the FAS.

The Crimson reported Garber saw last month's election results as an "anti-elite repudiation by the American electorate," and said Harvard "must listen to public criticism with 'empathy and humility.'"

So let's analyze the bolded parts of the block quote above.

It's no surprise that Republican members of Congress, along with Trump and Vice President-elect J.D. Vance, are beyond frustrated with the no-longer-hallowed halls of academia, including Harvard, but it does come as somewhat of a surprise that Garber suggested Democrat members are also frustrated Harvard, and by extension, other universities and college, as well. 

This could be for several reasons, including that many "moderate" Democrats have been held hostage by the radical faction of their party, including the likes of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, and Ayanna Pressley. 

Or, perhaps more than a few "moderate" Democrats in Congress agree with most of the bile spewed by radical, far-left professors but would like to see elitist academics turn down the volume a bit, given the repudiation of the Democrat Party in the election.

It's important to note that while Garber admitted Harvard's communications strategy has not worked as well as its leaders originally thought, he did not provide details on how Harvard would modify its messaging going forward.

Still, the Harvard Crimson wrote:

Garber’s conciliatory tone suggests he intends to take a diplomatic approach — rather than a defiant one — as he interacts with an incoming presidential administration that has Harvard in its crosshairs.

"Conciliatory tone." Interesting. And not uncommon on the left following what some call a "mandate" for Trump.

As I reported on Thursday, Facebook co-founder and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg's Meta Platforms (DBA: Meta, formerly named Facebook, Inc.) jetted to Florida for a private meeting with Trump and donated a measly million dollars to the incoming president's inaugural fund. This was Zuckerberg's latest attempt to make amends with Trump after admitting to Congress that Facebook censored users at the request of the Biden administration. 

Similarly, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, long a foe of the president-elect, congratulated Trump on X after the election for “an extraordinary political comeback and decisive victory,” and said this month that he’s “actually very optimistic this time around.” 

Speaking at a New York Times conference, he said: “What I’ve seen so far is that he is calmer than he was the first time and more confident, more settled.”

The Bottom Line

The list of people like Harvard President Alan Garber, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos is long, but the reason they're lining up to make a pilgrimage to Mar-a-Lago to kiss Trump's ring is short: 

Smart left-wingers who have more to lose than gain are well aware that they don't have a strong hand against a man who overcame incredible hurdles to become the 47th president of the United States. They also know if they get crosswise with Donald J. Trump, they're going to lose.



Self-deportation comes to Washington as bureaucrats abandon jobs ahead of Trump’s return



Trump has vowed to thoroughly overhaul the executive branch agencies, in part through his new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy.

By Ben Whedon for Just the News, 14 Dec. 2024

Government bureaucrats are abandoning ship ahead of President-elect Donald Trump’s return to the White House, anticipating either their termination or an intolerable upending of the status quo at their agencies.

Trump has vowed to thoroughly overhaul the executive branch agencies, in part through his new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy. The duo have called for drastically reducing the size of the government bureaucracy by encouraging voluntary departures through the end of remote work and the relocation of key agencies out of the D.C. area.

Thus far, it seems to be Trump’s appointees, and the prospect of working under them, that is doing much of the heavy lifting in driving out longtime agency employees. Former Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., for instance, caused such an uproar within the Department of Justice over the prospect of his confirmation as attorney general that it prompted a litany of headlines about “anxiety” within the DOJ and potential mass retirements.

Though Gaetz withdrew his nomination, the phenomenon appears to go beyond the Florida lawmaker and high profile officials have resigned from other agencies ahead of their impending replacement. Trump’s backup pick of ex-Florida AG Pam Bondi appears to have DOJ officials quaking in their boots.

Some key government officials, including those whose posts are not necessarily tied to political appointments, have taken it upon themselves to exit government service in light of the initiative and Trump’s return. [more]

Please read the remainder at:

https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/wkdself-deportation-comes-washington




Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage


Dems Call Trump A Threat To Democracy Because He Can Turn Their Lawfare Back On Them


President-elect Donald Trump is apparently a threat to democracy because he has the power to use the DOJ the way Democrats did against him.



President-elect Donald Trump is apparently a threat to democracy because he has the power to use the Department of Justice (DOJ) the way Democrats did against him.

In an interview released with MSNBC this week, former President Bill Clinton complained Hunter Biden’s crimes “pales in comparison with a deliberate use of the criminal justice system to punish your political enemies.”

Lest anyone might think Clinton was referring to President Joe Biden’s weaponization of the Justice Department, the 42nd president condemned Trump.

“This whole thing has been thrown off for several years now because of the dominance of what I call Roy Cohn politics. Roy Cohn was Sen. Joe McCarthy’s main adviser. Then he came back, and he was Donald Trump’s father’s main political adviser, and then President Trump,” Clinton said. “And Roy Cohn said, no matter what happens, always deny everything, always attack, and always accuse other people of doing what you’re doing.”

Either Clinton was speaking with absolutely zero self-awareness or was offering a textbook example of outright projection after Democrats launched a crusade of civil and criminal litigation to bankrupt and imprison their top challenger with nearly 100 state and federal charges across multiple jurisdictions.

Clinton isn’t the only one fretting about Trump’s return to the Oval Office as a supposed authoritarian who happened to be elected for a second time. National Public Radio (NPR) published this headline last week: “Could the FBI be weaponized under Trump?” Was anyone at NPR paying attention under Biden? Here’s another headline from The Washington Post: “Many Republicans are okay with Trump ignoring the law to target enemies.” The legacy media is reporting as if the Democrats’ unprecedented lawfare campaigns never happened.

But let’s go through Trump’s alleged crimes. In New York, a re-opened investigation from a Manhattan prosecutor received federal assistance to pursue charges previously declined by the Federal Election Commission (FEC), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Southern District of New York’s U.S. attorney’s office. Alvin Bragg, the district attorney who campaigned on a platform to prosecute Trump, ultimately captured a conviction on 34 charges for falsely characterizing payments to a lawyer as legal expenses.

In Florida, Trump was prosecuted for the alleged mishandling of classified documents after top secret records were found throughout the former president’s private Mar-a-Lago residence. FBI stormtroopers raided the property in 2022 under sweeping warrants that granted officials authority to confiscate any and all documents Trump may have come in contact with as president. The case was dropped this summer after a federal judge in Florida ruled the special counsel’s appointment was unconstitutional. Federal prosecutors dropped a similar case against Biden earlier this year after Special Counsel Robert Hur reported the president had a “poor memory.”

In Georgia, Trump faces criminal charges related to objections over the 2020 election. Trump is being prosecuted by local officials plagued in scandal because he made the same challenges to the election outcome which Democrats have made for decades. In fact, Democrats objected to more states in the 2016 election than Republicans did in 2020, but none faced criminal charges.

In Washington, D.C., federal prosecutors indicted Trump on charges related to the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riot, wherein a horde of demonstrators descended on a joint session of Congress before the president finished speaking at the White House. While Trump urged supporters to make their voices heard “peacefully,” prosecutors still charged the president with inciting the riot, and only dropped their case following his re-election.

Even if Trump might escape jail time and additional fines beyond the civil cases brought against him by partisan prosecutors in New York, others within Trump’s orbit did not. Former Trump advisers Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon both spent four months in prison this year for refusing to comply with the Democrats’ Soviet-style inquisition run by the since-disbanded Jan. 6 Committee.

Trump was asked last weekend on NBC about whether he would seek “retribution” against political opponents who weaponized the state to put him in jail.

“I’m not looking to go back into the past,” Trump said. “Retribution will be through success.”