Wednesday, December 4, 2024

Why Are Deep Red State Republican Senators So Often Squishes?



It was no shock when Senator Mike Rounds of one of the Dakotas – I don’t know or care which one, but they’re both supposedly deep red – went on a Sunday morning TV show, which is strike one, and announced that he thinks Christopher Wray is a great guy. Christopher Wray is not a great guy. He’s a deep-state flunky who has turned law enforcement against decent American patriots like us in the service of the Democrats. He shouldn’t finish out his term at the FBI; he should finish out his term at Leavenworth. What the hell is this crap from a supposedly conservative Republican senator? Rounds is so tone-deaf he couldn’t be autotuned into coherence. And the fact that he’s from a super red state makes it even worse. We need to ask ourselves the question – and answer it – about why the hell the red states so often seem to elect the biggest squish sissies in the Republican caucus.

You see this all the time. We got John Cornyn, who actually pushed a gun control bill with the Democrats because of Muh Bipartisanship or some such nonsense. He’s from Texas! We know Texas can do better – they have Ted Cruz! We got James Lankford, who gave the Democrats a talking point they simply will not shut up about by capitulating on immigration. This guy is from Oklahoma! There’s Bill Cassidy from Louisiana and Thom Tillis from one of the Carolinas. Those are not blue states. And now it appears that Utah has replaced Mitt Romney with a more ethnic Mitt Romney clone, though every single person on earth is more ethnic than Mitt Romney. 

There are rational explanations for some soft Republicans. Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski is from a state with a bizarre electoral system that lets her manipulate the elections. I don’t have a beef with Maine’s Susan Collins because she’s from a blue state, and she’s never pretended to be a conservative. But what the hell is up with these other ones? These guys are from red states. These guys should be savages. They should be animals. They should be chewing up commies and spitting out their crushed bones.

But no. No, they harken to the institutions. They care what the Washington Post thinks. They are all about the norms that haven’t existed since the Dems used them on us as a suppository.

Instead of fighting like men, they act like a bunch of invertebrate sissies. “Oh no, Donald Trump actually supports nominating people loyal to the vision he expressed on the campaign trail and that the American people voted for! Some of them don’t like the status quo! Some of them want to change things! Some of them are aggressively heterosexual! Oh my gosh, the scumbag bureaucrats and deep-state parasites who persecuted Republicans for the last decade might just be held to account! Well, we can’t have any of that. What about the norms? What about the institutions? What about my campaign donations?”

Here’s the problem with Republicans from deep red states. Deep red state Republican parties are, by necessity, big tents. They are not just conservatives. They also include little weasels who would be Democrats if they were anywhere else. The fact is that if you want to be elected dog catcher in East Dakota or Idaho or someplace like that, you have to be part of the GOP. So, anybody who wants to get elected to anything is pretty much going to join the GOP. But that doesn’t mean they’re conservative. And in many cases, they’re not conservative at all. 

We see this again and again. Now, it’s not as bad as it used to be. We’ve gotten rid of a lot of these tools. But the dynamic is still there. You can be a moderate Republican in a state like Texas, believe it or not. They pretend to be right-wing at election time, and then once they get established, out comes the communism. They get in there, gum up the works, and collaborate with Democrats to do things like block school choice. It becomes a giant hassle to remove them. Oh, it’s possible. It can happen. Texas conservatives are purifying the party right now at the state level. You’ll probably see Texas go for school choice next year. But it took several election cycles to get rid of these imposters.

What they’ve learned is that they can be liberal without accountability. If you’re never held to account, you’ll never learn to behave. Many of them are well-established in office. The state parties are always full of insiders, and that’s who these legislators suck up to. They have the money and the party structure, but mostly they have a Republican voter base that’s just not paying attention. They have a Republican voter base that’s not saying, “Hey, wait a minute, what the hell are you doing undermining the president we just elected?” If the voters refuse to act, and if the voters refuse to hold these geeks accountable at election time, then they’re never going to learn. 

We must teach them. A politician’s proper state is one of abject terror of the electorate. They should be petrified of crossing the line and alienating us, but that requires that we voters pay attention. In red states, the voters are not doing that, and these spineless weenies are the result.

Right now, John Cornyn has no primary opponent for 2026. But he should have one. He should have a strong one, like Ken Paxton, who is not weak, not spineless, and not eager to do things that please liberals rather than satisfy conservative patriots. But just getting the voters angry isn’t enough. Again, these guys are entrenched, like ticks, and they’ve got a lot of money and institutional support. Yet, there’s another factor at play this time.

There’s Donald Trump this time, and he has nothing to lose. If he decides to pay attention to the people who deprive him of the nominees he needs to complete his agenda and keep his promises, those politicians will have a real problem. Trump needs to have a sit down with John Cornyn, Mike Rounds, and the rest of these weebles. He must promise them that if they cross him, he will make them his hobby. He will focus his attention on their primary races by lifting up solid conservative candidates to oppose them. And you know what? Donald Trump coming to Dallas, Houston, and other places in Texas may allow us to leverage Cornyn out of his sinecure.

Now, it might not work. But it will cause them pain. A lot of pain. And that’s something. They need to suffer if they cross us. Again, politicians should be treated like garbage. They work for us, not vice versa, and if they can’t cut it, they need to be discarded like trash. And you voters in red states need to take an interest in your own politicians. Do better. It’s ridiculous that you can be so deeply red and still elect hacks who play footsies with the blue. 



X22, And we Know, and more- Dec 4

 




0:00 / 0:00

15 seconds

15 seconds

UMich regent: Board re-thinking DEI statements, programs after intense ‘scrutiny’

Public university may get rid of ideological ‘litmus tests’ for faculty, Regent Sarah Hubbard says


Micaiah Bilger - Assistant Editor 

https://www.thecollegefix.com/umich-regent-board-re-thinking-dei-statements-programs-after-intense-scrutiny/

The University of Michigan Board of Regents will consider cutting diversity, equity, and inclusion hiring practices and programming after its DEI efforts have faced intense “scrutiny,” Regent Sarah Hubbard said Sunday.

Hubbard (picturedtold Fox & Friends the board plans to take a “critical look” at its DEI spending and programs during its meeting Thursday.

“I’ve been asking a lot of questions since I was first elected to this board, and really believe we need to do something differently here,” she said.

One of the changes the regents plan to consider is “getting rid of diversity statements, which are a litmus tests for our faculty and academics when they’re applying for jobs and being considered for a promotion,” Hubbard said.

“These diversity statements require them to talk about what they’ve done for DEI lately and what they plan to do,” and they “really limit” programs, she said.

The public university is facing growing criticism for spending approximately $250 million since 2016 to integrate DEI practices throughout the institution. These efforts include a DEI manager for its botanical garden and a hip-hop performance for its DEI 2.0 launch, The College Fix has reported.

Despite the emphasis and spending on DEI, Hubbard said the university has not seen “the needle moving related to diversity of thought in particular on campus, let alone diversity in other ways.”

“When I think about what we could have done with that money, how many students we could have covered their tuition because they had need … I wish we could look at these things,” she said.

Hubbard also expressed concerns about the university’s “very large bureaucracy.”

Research published exclusively by The College Fix earlier this year by economist Mark Perry found the University of Michigan has more than 500 employees focused on DEI, with payroll costs exceeding $30 million annually.

“Lately the scrutiny has just really increased, and we’ve had a number of other issues related on campus to protests and other upheaval and it’s given us a chance to take closer scrutiny of this,” Hubbard said.

Hubbard told Fox & Friends she supports programs that are “good for everybody” – a statement she reiterated in an X post Sunday.

In 2023, the university launched a five-year effort to integrate DEI into every aspect of the institution, including “de-emphasizing singular Western historical narratives” in an architecture program,” The Fix reported.

MORE: UMich botanical garden employs DEI manager

MORE: UMich now has more than 500 jobs dedicated to DEI

IMAGE: Fox & Friends/X

Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter

Joe Biden Is a Genius


Joe Biden is a genius.

OK, he's actually a doddering old fool who can't remember his own name half the time, but we know he has moments of lucidity here and there. We also know that he wanted a second term and his fellow Democrats pushed him to the side. Why he would be shocked that the party that uses "old white men" as a pejorative wouldn't really be behind an old white man is beyond me, yet he apparently was.

From the moment he stepped aside, though, Biden seemed bound and determined to scuttle Kamala Harris's nomination.

Sure, it may have been gaffe after gaffe – or, such as when he said Harris had been intimately involved in economic discussions just as she was trying to distance herself from Biden's economic policies, he might have actually thought it would help – but over a month ago, I commented how it looked just like he was trying to sabotage her.

Plus, despite everyone calling Trump "literally Hitler," what did Biden do immediately after the election? Have Trump come on over and have a nice sit-down chat with him, something you don't do with someone who is considered the most evil man to ever live reincarnated.

Then we have the Hunter Biden pardon.

You've heard all about it by now. You know what was said, what Biden's "reasoning" was, and how he'd repeatedly claimed that he would do no such thing, only to turn out that he lied yet again.

But in that same moment, he set a precedent that President-elect Donald Trump can now use as he wants. The problem was that the prosecution was political? That can be said about pretty much every January 6 defendant. Trump could pardon them all, and over a broad period to make sure they couldn't be prosecuted for anything else later on.

Others have been prosecuted because of their affiliation with Trump. Steve Bannon, for example, or Roger Stone. While Bannon has done his time and it was only a misdemeanor, it would send a signal how he's running things. Trump held off in pardoning Stone last go-around because it would be a political liability, but that's not as true today as it was in 2020.

Honestly, from the moment when he left the campaign trail, Joe Biden has done so much that has benefitted Trump that it's hard for me not to look at some of it and wonder if he was really just trying to hurt the Democrats.

I wouldn't be surprised if he did. He'd been a good Democrat for decades, working his way up the food chain and finally making it to the top, only to have his party turn on him. If that were me, and I were actually lucid enough of the time, I'd probably think about ways to get back at them without being too obvious.

Of course, that all assumes there's enough of Biden left to actually be that calculating. I can't rule out that his handlers are resentful of being ousted with the old goat, so it might be them working through Biden, but that feels a little too tin-foil hat for me.

Then again, the difference between "established fact" and "conspiracy theory" seems to be about six weeks, so anything's possible.



🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Trump Should Pardon Victims Of Dems’ J6 Lawfare On Day One


Trump could and should pardon the J6 political prisoners as one of his first acts in office, or at least commute sentences.



While Hunter Biden enjoys the privileges of a sweeping presidential pardonRachel Powell, a Pennsylvania mother of eight, is spending the holidays locked away from the people she loves. While President Joe Biden’s corrupt son enjoys a get-out-of-jail-free card erasing a long list of felonies and potential offenses, Powell, marked as an “insurrectionist” for a property damage crime at the Capitol, languishes in a federal prison. 

It’s the punctuation mark on the perversion of justice that has defined the Biden years, an era of lawlessness in which “no one is above the law” but this president, his grifting family and his constitution-ripping cronies. 

Biden’s unconditional pardon of his ne’re-do-well progeny, issued as Americans were still drowsy from their Thanksgiving leftovers, covers more than a decade of felonies and sundry crimes that Hunter “committed or may have committed.” Legal experts are calling the act of absolution “unprecedented,” exceeding President Gerald Ford’s pardon of the man he succeeded, Richard Nixon, post-Watergate. Even that wide pardon only covered Nixon’s presidency — Jan. 20, 1969 to Aug. 9. 1974. 

‘This Pardon is Just Deflating’

The only thing surprising about Biden’s broad act of leniency gifted to his crack-addled son is that anyone is surprised by it. But Never Trumpers like Joe Walsh sound absolutely heartbroken that Biden has once again been shown to be the unrepentant liar he is after insisting on multiple occasions that he would not pardon Hunter, who faces sentencing on gun-related and tax evasion felony convictions.  

“I said I would abide by the jury’s decisions and I will do that, and I will not pardon him,” the president told ABC News’ David Muir, press puppet for the Democratic Party and their presidential candidates, in an interview in June. 

After hearing that Biden is breaking his word, a dispirited Walsh sounded like a cuckolded lover. 

“They’re all like that,” the Trump-hating former Republican congressman from Illinois moaned Sunday evening on MSNBC. “So the next time any of us complain about anything Trump does, this — this pardon is just deflating. For those of us who have been out there for a few years now yelling about what a unique threat Donald Trump is, for Joe Biden to do something like this, Trump — ‘nobody’s above the law,’ we’ve been screaming.”

Walsh and his fellow Never Trumpers have joined Democrats in their full-throated support of one of the darkest chapters in U.S. history — the politically-driven witch hunts of pro-Trump protesters at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. For nearly four years, Biden’s Department of Justice, led by his Javert, Attorney General Merrick Garland, in arresting, prosecuting and imprisoning hundreds of political prisoners. Like 44-year-old Rachel Powell. The Biden administration and their pals in the Pravda press continue to paint the eventual riots over a rigged 2020 election as a coordinated “insurrection” driven by their No. 1 political enemy: Donald J. Trump, the 45th and soon-to-be 47th president of the United States. 

‘You’re Going to Take 8 Years of Her Life Away?’

Nearly 1,600 people have been caught up in the Biden Justice Department investigations. More than 500 people “have been sentenced to periods of incarceration,” some on an “obstruction of an official proceeding” charge tossed out earlier this year by the U.S. Supreme Court. Interestingly, the high court’s ruling found the DOJ employed an “inappropriately broad interpretation” of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

The DOJ hit Powell, who became known as the “bullhorn lady” in the press, with the obstruction charge. She also was charged with civil disorder, disorderly conduct in a Capitol building, destruction of government property, and entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds with a deadly or dangerous weapon — the “ice axe and battering ram” that law enforcement officials say she used to break through a window and “breach the Capitol” as Congress convened to count the 2020 electoral votes. Powell told Newsweek that she “used the axe and the cardboard battering ram to break a window so that some in the group near the tunnel could move to open spaces,” and a bullhorn “to flag a nearby safe haven that she saw on the other side of the glass she had shattered.” 

Powell is serving a nearly five-year prison sentence after D.C. District Judge Royce Lamberth threw the book at her in October 2023. Before that, Powell spent years on strict house arrest awaiting trial and sentencing. 

“She had an ankle monitor. She was not allowed to leave her home,” said Cynthia Hughes, founder and president of the Patriot Freedom Project, a nonprofit organization providing support to J6 political prisoners and their families. Hughes was interviewed on an upcoming edition of The Federalist Radio Hour podcast. Her nephew, Tim Hale, spent three years in prison on J6-related, trumped up charges, including a year in solitary confinement.

Powell “missed her daughter’s wedding. She missed the birth of her two grandchildren. She couldn’t even go to a doctor appointment if one of her children needed the assistance of her mother,” Hughes added. 

Powell’s youngest child was just 7 when she was sent to prison. 

While Powell did damage government property, Hughes said she didn’t assault anyone or hurt law enforcement officials during the riot and she had no previous criminal record. Yet, the mother of eight received harsher treatment than many of the Black Lives Matter protesters engaged in riots that burned down government buildings, destroyed private property and brutally assaulted police. 

“Yeah, she broke a window but you’re going to take eight years of her life away?” Hughes said.  She’s lost her home, she lost custody of her children for a small minute. She had a terrible public defender.” 

And now Powell is serving a nearly five-year prison sentence followed by 36 months of supervised release. Hunter Biden, who faced years in prison and more than $1.3 million in fines is a free man. He owes nothing. If it’s any consolation to the J6 political prisoners learning of the pardon from behind prison bars, the younger Biden says he will never forget the kindness bestowed on him by his powerful father and that he will commit himself to “helping those who are still sick and suffering.” 

He remains defiant, despite his father’s forbearance. 

“I have admitted and taken responsibility for my mistakes during the darkest days of my addiction – mistakes that have been exploited to publicly humiliate and shame me and my family for political sport,” Hunter said in a statement to the press.  

Miscarriage of Justice’

Biden defended his son and his sweeping pardon, insisting that “Hunter was treated differently” under the law. Well, welcome to the club, Hunter. The hundreds of J6 political prisoners his father’s administration has persecuted over the past four years know what disparate treatment feels like. 

President-elect Trump has met with some the families of the people he has described as hostages. He has said that he would pardon a “large portion” of the people convicted on federal charges related to the Capitol riots. On Truth Social earlier this year Trump wrote that one of his “first acts as your next president” will be to “Free the January 6 Hostages being wrongfully imprisoned.” 

Following Biden’s generous gift to his repugnant son, Trump asked on his Truth Social account, “Does the Pardon given by Joe to Hunter include the J-6 Hostages, who have now been imprisoned for years? Such an abuse and miscarriage of Justice!”

‘He Keeps His Promises’

The president-elect raises a good point. Trump could and should pardon the J6 political prisoners as one of his first acts in office, or at least commute sentences. He likely will stop the prosecutions and end the witch hunt that the Biden administration has carried out. But Biden should spend the last days of his shameful presidency rectifying of the bigger injustices of his time in office.  He should pardon the political enemies his DOJ has prosecuted as “insurrectionists.”

He claims his disgraced boy is a victim of politics, “singled out only because he is my son — and that is wrong.” Many of the protesters who showed up to the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 are victims of vendetta political politics. That was wrong. It remains so. 

But Biden is as political as he is corrupt. So the people locked away on political crimes will have to await deliverance from the man the Biden regime desperately tried but failed to defeat, imprison, even murder. 

Trump, unlike Biden, is a man of his word, Hughes said. 

“He keeps his promises,” the Patriot Freedom Project founder said. 

And when Trump does follow through on his promise of pardons, Democrats, Never Trumpers and their accomplice media friends will have no standing to complain. 



Tucker Carlson is Back in Moscow, Russia, to Interview Sergey Lavrov


Congratulations to Tucker Carlson for gaining re-entry visas during a time when Russia has essentially locked down their visitor entry process.  Tucker Carlson has announced he is back in Moscow, Russia for an interview with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.  WATCH:



This should be an exceptional interview at a very critical time in the transition of U.S. power.

Below is a transcript of the recent comments made by Russian President Vladimir Putin remarking on President Donald Trump.

[Transcript] ♦ Question: Vladimir Kulagin, Vedomosti.

To what degree should and could the current escalation, initiated by the Biden administration’s approval for ATACMS strikes on Russia, influence the potential for establishing connections with the forthcoming Trump administration? How significant will this factor be in shaping relationships? Or are there perhaps other indicators that complicate this endeavor?

♦ Vladimir Putin: We are unaware of the discussions between Mr Trump and the incumbent President during their meeting. We simply do not know, and therefore, we shall refrain from commenting on it – it is not feasible.

There are various scenarios. If incumbent President Biden believes that by escalating tensions, by intensifying the confrontation, he is paving the way for the future administration to extricate itself from this predicament, allowing the President-elect to say: “It’s not me, it’s others who have lost their senses. I have no part in this. Let’s engage in dialogue.” Certainly, that remains a possibility.

Another plausible scenario is that the current administration seeks to create additional challenges for the future administration. That too is conceivable. However, from my perspective, the newly elected president is both intelligent and experienced, and I believe he will discover a solution, especially after enduring such, shall we say, a significant challenge as the battle to reclaim the White House.

You know, what struck me most, and I think you share my view, was not the fact that entirely uncivilised means were employed against Trump, absolutely uncivilised, including attempts on his life, more than once (incidentally, I believe he is still not entirely safe). So what? There have been various instances in the history of the United States. I believe he is a wise and hopefully judicious individual who comprehends all this. But what astonished me more was that during the attacks on him, during the struggle against him, not only was he subjected to degrading, unfounded procedures, legal charges, and so on, but his family members and children were targeted.

Our gangsters do not engage in such behaviour. When criminal groups clash among themselves, they do not involve women and children; they leave them be, men fight among themselves. But these individuals did involve them, can you believe it? It is so repugnant that it underscores once more the complete disarray of today’s American political system.

Nevertheless, the country remains great, unquestionably. We are open to dialogue with the United States, including with the future administration.

Thank you very much. Have a pleasant day. Goodbye.  (LINK)

Promo video: