Sunday, November 17, 2024

Trump Will Have Two Years to Run Wild -- and Then What?


In the worst sneak attack we'd ever faced, Japan took us by surprise on Dec. 7, 1941. 

The nation's mood then was universally anti-war, with the sentiment to stay out of Europe and not get involved in another foreign war. 

On that day, an unprepared and enranged America instantly changed its mind. 

Germany declared war on the U.S. within days.  For two years, we played catch-up to the reality of what a weak defense and foreign policy invite, translated into tens of thousands of dead American boys. 

Things began to turn around for us after the battle of Midway in June of 1942.  But, it would take another six months before the last Japanese territorial expansion finally peaked with attacks in Darwin, Australia, and Calcutta, India, in November and December of 1942.  On Jan. 2, 1943, the long climb back up bore fruit with our first big win in Buna, New Guinea, and then later the collapse of the Japanese in Guadalcanal in February.

Japan's General Yamamoto is quoted as saying:

"I can run wild for six months ... after that, I have no expectation of success."

Japan's defeat at the Battle of the Coral Sea proved Yamamoto prescient. 

In the here and now, president-elect Trump faces a similar picture. 

Instead of six months, he'll have at least 18 (six months before the next national election) to cement all the major changes he's likely to make in his final administration.  If he can't get his signature actions enacted into law by about that time, the realization is that there is no guarantee we'll hold the House or Senate in the second half of his term. 

Trump is off to a great start with multiple high-octane picks, which bodes well for his first 100 days.  Trump can't allow his momentum to slow even a little in his first 18 months.  After that, the vagaries of the election calendar, courts, and other factors will figure mightily into what's possible and what's not.

No one should ever underestimate the country's mood or how lightning-fast it can and does change.  Donald Trump comes into power with a mandate to enact change; he dare not squander this precious moment.  This is what the electorate agreed on when voting this month. 

Trump and the Republicans must be mindful that Kamala Harris received about nine million fewer votes than Biden in his first race.  (Trump received about 1.3 million more than last time.)  Political pundits are trying to rationalize the takeaways of what happened to those nine million.  The reality is, this election could have gone the other way if nine million more had voted or some portion had been counted as such, if you get my drift.

The political calendar is unfavorable to the Republicans in 2026, both in the Senate and particularly with an expected loss of House seats an incumbent presidency typically sees.  The call will soon ring out to temper our worst angels, seek accommodation, and reduce Republican so-called extremism: "Conservatives must hold steady and not yield to the siren calls for unity and bipartisanship," Anony Mee wrote in a recent American Thinker piece.  

Trump and his supporters must not squander the moment at this precise juncture with the biggest win against progressives ever.  Just as we believed this most recent election was the most consequential of our lifetime, what we do with it is even more critical.  This is the moment when we separate the true believers from those who value their political survival over what conservatism requires.  The next 18 months are all or nothing.  We can't survive if we don't win on big issues like:

  • A final and complete rewrite of the immigration code codifying a guest worker program, the end of birthright citizenship, and a controlled border that an illegal alien or terrorist should fear attempting to cross
  • A prioritized return of illegal immigrants to their home countries
  • De-woking our government, especially our military
  • Growing the power of our military to deter foreign wars
  • Bringing manufacturing jobs back to the United States and end most welfare to fill those jobs created
  • Shrink the federal government by 1% a year, not growing it as Biden has, excluding the military, and reevaluating pay and benefits that frequently dwarf what is paid in the private sector for the same job classification
  • Rooting out partisanship throughout government that allowed FEMA personnel to think they could get away with bypassing damaged homes with Trump signs or flags or for the IRS to deny the non-profit status of conservative organizations without consequences
  • Change American foreign policy to be crystal clear.  No more strategic ambiguity that had the effect of having our adversaries test us and find us not instantly reacting to provocations
  • End the cultural wars progressives enacted over the last 40 years. End the information wars and censorship Democrats have enacted in recent years
  • Bring God, ethics, and citizenship back into our classrooms starting in kindergarten
  • Ensure tolerance is a two-way street with no one threatened for their beliefs
  • Do whatever we can to strengthen two-parent families and increase their birth rates

Republicans must put steel in their spines and put away petty party differences. If they do, they can become a juggernaut of change that our citizens, friends abroad, and enemies who no longer believe we can muster or sustain what our superpower status ultimately offers. Nothing is beyond Republicans' grasp if they can do that and stay true and on course.  

This is our last best chance, and it is time to show the world why America is truly exceptional.  If Trump and his Republicans don't rise to the moment, we'll all soon know the answer, and this historic moment will never return.

God bless America.



X22, And we Know, and more- Nov 17

 




President Trump’s Magic Show Begins


If you’ve ever played speed chess, then you can appreciate what President Trump is about to do to “official” Washington.  This won’t be like 2017, when the president did everything he could to work amicably with House and Senate Republicans.  This time, you either get on the “Trump Train” or kindly throw yourself from the back car.  There’s no time to waste, and the president won’t be slowing down for stragglers.  

After his first election, President Trump arrived in D.C. with Republican majorities in Congress, too.  He expected that the people who had promised to repeal Obamacare for seven years would have a legislative package ready for him to sign into law.  He expected that Republicans who had campaigned on securing the border for four decades would be prepared to do what it takes to achieve that goal for the American people.  His expectations were met with the disappointing reality of squishy Republican backbones and Uniparty backstabbing.

While Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell informed President Trump which of his potential nominees would get Republican support (McConnell’s wife, for instance, would have no problem winning confirmation), House Speaker Paul Ryan told him that there was just no money to build a border wall (because Ryan had already spent trillions supporting Barack Obama’s policy agenda).  Both Republicans took turns publicly laughing at Trump for arriving in D.C. with the misguided belief that the work of government could be anything other than slow.  McConnell and Ryan wasted most of President Trump’s first year in office bickering about how best to dismantle Obamacare before finally throwing up their hands in feigned exasperation after Senator John McCain saved the Democrats’ costly expansion of government-directed medicine with his final “screw you” vote. 

On the other hand, McConnell and Ryan took the Russia collusion hoax very seriously.  Although Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Brennan, Jim Comey, and numerous other coup-plotters inside the Intelligence Community had created that fantasy as a mechanism for illegally spying on candidate Trump before his election and as a mechanism for overthrowing President Trump after his inauguration, congressional Republicans treated the matter as if it deserved their utmost attention.  McConnell and Ryan both knew that the allegations against Trump were ridiculous, but they eagerly assisted Democrats in their efforts to paint the president as a Russian spy.  Why?  Because holding Trump’s fate in their hands gave them power over his presidency.  

President Trump entered office in 2017 beholden to no one.  No secret billionaires had funded his campaign.  No foreign governments had secretly supported his run for office.  Unlike other politicians who are easily controlled once the Intelligence Community digs up enough dirt from their pasts, President Trump has never had a problem showing the public exactly who he is.  How do you manipulate a man who has few secrets and whose peccadilloes are already widely known?  You make him “Putin’s puppet” and enlist Republican leaders to legitimize the farcical intelligence operation.  With “friends” like McConnell and Ryan, President Trump was surrounded by enemies.

Well, ladies and gentlemen, you can play that phony card only once.  There will not be another round of Uniparty and Intelligence Community hijinks engineered to divide the American people and stifle the MAGA agenda.  The “news” organizations that ran Russia collusion stories for years have exposed themselves as mere propagandists for the State.  The credibility of the media, Intelligence Community, FBI, DOJ, and Uniparty lies in tatters.  The “Trump Train” has left the station, and it’s picking up speed.

Heads must roll.  People who fabricated the Russia collusion hoax must pay a price.  Because nobody ever suffered for inflicting this fraud upon the American people, the worst offenders just continued offending.  We got the fake quid-pro-quo Ukraine impeachment (which was designed to cover up real quid-pro-quo crimes of the Biden Crime Family and other powerful political-crime families in D.C. that rake in a great deal of money from foreign regimes).  We got the J6 psy-op in which demonstrators protesting for free and fair elections were condemned as “insurrectionists.”  We got the unending lawfare from Democrat prosecutors and Merrick Garland’s Department of (in)Justice designed to imprison Trump, his friends, and his voters.  These crimes against the American people will not stop until the perpetrators are brought to justice.  Conspirators, fraudsters, and government employees who used their offices to persecute innocent Americans for their political beliefs must be held accountable.

While President Trump and his new administration sort through the nest of vipers in D.C., they will keep the guilty preoccupied.  It is difficult to respond to the president’s constant moves when you’re spending fifteen hundred dollars an hour on legal representation.  Expect President Trump to show Establishment Republicans just how much can be accomplished in Washington when the overarching command is simple: Let’s get s--- done.

Illegal immigration, inflation, crime, economic malaise, bureaucratic regulation, “woke” indoctrination, censorship, and the growing likelihood of WWIII are the consequential issues that broadened and strengthened President Trump’s MAGA coalition in 2024.  Americans feel that their country is vulnerable and in decline.  They overwhelmingly believe that their country is on the wrong track.  They are desperate for the federal government to take their worries seriously.  With their votes, they have spoken loudly.  President Trump has been given a mandate to execute on his policy initiatives and to prove to the American people that their voices have been heard.

President Trump will give the Deep State a magic show.  As is his wont, he will move fast, change directions, and keep his opponents off guard.  He will juggle numerous balls in the air and still surprise his adversaries with a rabbit from under his hat.  Pay attention.

President Trump is serious about mass deportations.  The American people cannot be made to feel unsafe in their own communities.  Expect to see the Obama-Biden handouts for illegal aliens come to an end.  Expect to see violent criminals rounded up.  Expect to see border security reactivated.  Expect to see the completion of a border wall.  And expect international cartels currently in control of the U.S. border to be designated as terrorist organizations.  The old way of doing things is over.  Those who have been destroying America with fentanyl, human-trafficking, and organized crime have no place to hide.  Their days are numbered.

Bureaucratic regulations operate like hidden taxes that increase the cost of necessary purchases, such as food and fuel.  When agencies issue new rules, they steal liberty from the American people and empower themselves with additional authorities.  Expect President Trump to send in the equivalent of several Special Operations Forces to wage war on the administrative state.  Their mission is to slash red tape, battle the bureaucratic Leviathan, liberate markets from undue restraints, and return freedom to the American people.

Expect President Trump to return to tariffs as his preferred tool for battling international foes while increasing economic opportunities for America’s middle class.  Wall Street hates tariffs because multinational companies do not benefit from “America First” policies.  Main Street, however, benefits greatly.  When the cost of doing business overseas is greater than the cost of producing goods in America, domestic manufacturing rises.  When foreign regimes respond with their own tariffs, it becomes more expensive for American-produced food and energy to be exported.  Those supplies stay home, and domestic prices decrease.  Expect President Trump to accomplish through deregulation and tariffs something that the “experts” say is impossible: deflation in the United States.

President Trump sees America’s natural resources and the American people’s unmatched ingenuity as the country’s greatest weapons.  He will unleash domestic productivity and, by doing so, use the nation’s economic strengths as both sword and shield against foreign enemies.  The rabbit under his hat is the prospect of global peace.



Morning Again (Again) in America


Prouder, stronger, better.  That was the message from the most iconic political ad in history, called “Morning in America,” that was used during the Reagan campaign in 1984.  The message is resonating again in late 2024.

There is a brightness of spirit and a feeling of lightness.  It is as though dark clouds have been blasted away from America by a sudden sunburst.  Though the left remains suspicious and the uncommitted stay in their normal state of uncertainty, for the rest of us, the future now looks full of promise and renewed opportunity — and down the road, finally, an effective government.

The most exciting development post-election is Trump retaining the eager services of Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy teaming together to address the massive waste, fraud, and abuse across all federal departments.  The target impact: $2 trillion annually.  They are optimistic from their involvement in government regulation and contracts and bureaucracy that it can be achieved.  Plans are already underway.

Like Trump in his first term, neither Elon nor Vivek wants any compensation; they are doing this important work apart from their businesses for love of America.  The left does not know what to make of this and likely will try to put a stop to it.

To attract perhaps our two best minds is testimony to the strength of the Make America Great Again movement, a key to which is moving quickly to a much smaller, more efficient, and effective federal government that mainly stays out of the way of American enterprise.

Follow that up with other inspired choices of brilliant people for top Cabinet, ambassador, and chief of staff positions.  Across all selections, the common theme is intelligence, relevant experience, not being plucked from the Deep State, and a firm resolve to Make America Great Again.  They all have demonstrated high performance, are each is driven and will brook no delay or resistance.  Importantly, they know that their jobs are not to follow protocol, but instead to innovate and change the culture in government.

Someone said Trump is assembling a team of SEALs.  Outstanding.

Many of these are government outsiders and will face the rejoinder that they have no bureaucratic experience to run, reconfigure, or eliminate large bureaucracies.  Yes, and look what our large bureaucracies have gotten us: $35 trillion in debt and little to show for it.  The government is not good with money.  It does not innovate or solve problems.  We do not need more “expert bureaucrats.”

Pete Hegseth as secretary of defense in particular will be questioned as not understanding the fine workings of the Pentagon.  That institution that has not come close to passing an audit, and billions disappear, unaccounted for, every year.  He is supposedly not qualified to set new leadership there.  His confirmation is a coming battle worth winning and not allowing a fallback of inserting another longtime bureaucrat — even a military general.

DNA has not mattered in the Trump choices.  Merit has returned, and scholarship across all disciplines will now have the perfect case study in comparing the two systems back to back.

The contrast is the Biden administration’s Cabinet, which from his V.P. pick on showed that he (or his advisers) was most interested in diversity of DNA, not perspective.  They bragged about being the most diverse ever and enforced it across all government agencies, via presidential executive order.  The objective for all federal departments was to achieve diversity, inclusion, and equity.

The resultant résumés were thin, and it cannot be said that these important if undistinguished secretaries and directors, given many opportunities, rose to the occasion during the term.  In fact, they were often vacationing or otherwise unavailable.  There was a slew of failures, from the Afghan withdrawal to the COVID mandates to the port crisis, to the planned collapse of the border and over ten million aliens swarming in, to the “transitory” inflation and the outbreak of two avoidable wars.  Despite it all, no replacements were made to the Cabinet or directors of subordinate agencies.  Punishment, rare as it was, generally was to be sent home on paid leave.

Very close to the election, a narrowly avoided assassination of Trump was so thoroughly and obviously bungled by the Secret Service that it raised dark thoughts about true intentions.  At least that director resigned — weeks after the fact, and after intense rebukes in Congress — but she was not fired for cause.

The Democrats’ and media’s incessant claims that Trump was a threat to democracy were based on two things: January 6 and the way they mentally processed that, and the threat that Trump posed to the institutions, the vast bureaucracy: the Deep State.

When they say, “Protect democracy,” they mean either protect the bureaucratic state or protect the Democrat party.  When they think of America, they think of the government.  They do not mean protect individual freedom — that was demonstrated with the COVID mandates.  They do not mean protect the Constitution: they want government censorship and restrictions on free speech and would like to do away with the Electoral College.

Getting to a positive impact of $2 trillion will involve eliminating the estimated $500 billion in annual fraud, cutting entire agencies, and eliminating tens of thousands of regulations that hamper business growth.  Simplifying the tax code would be helpful, along with eliminating subsidies that have existed unnecessarily for decades, and Trump will need to get those fair trade agreements with our key trading partners.

In summary, it is a bright day in America!  It is a relief to have an incredibly effective president in Trump, and the team he is assembling is the most talented of modern times, clearly disposed to work with and not against the private sector.  Finally, they are united in their dedication to the goal voters embraced: Make America Great Again.



🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


We Need to Stop This From Happening to Our Children


Thanks to the left, who has made kids—honestly, the entire younger generation—soft and easily offended when they encounter a tough situation they don’t like. Instead of being taught to keep their heads held high and walk through fire, kids these days are taught that it’s acceptable to throw tantrums and combust when they don’t like a certain outcome. 

That is exactly what U.S. universities and media outlets are inciting. 

Ariella Cook-hyphen-Shonkoff, a child therapist from Berkeley, California, wrote an article in the San Francisco Chronicle titled “How to Talk to Your Kids About Donald Trump’s Election.”

She claims that children aged seven to ten since “an unstable, unpredictable figure will soon take the country’s helm for a second tour.” 

Here’s how she instructs you how to handle their “grieving.”

Before engaging with kiddos, give yourself some space — and grace — to grieve if you voted for Kamala Harris. Hug someone close, walk in the woods, sit on a beach, cry under a blanket, write in a journal, blast loud music. Just be present with whatever feelings are bubbling up. Check your pulse. Are you feeling heated, reactive or in the throes of despair? If so, delay the conversation. If you’re lost in your own muck, it’s going to be hard to bear a child’s big feelings, worries and questions, and support them. Wait until you feel reasonably calm or grounded. That’s not to say you can’t shed tears or show some anger; emotions are part of our humanness. Find a Goldilocks recipe that feels right for your kiddo… Lastly, wrap up your talk with something that feels like a resolution so children are not left dangling into an emotional abyss.

The reporter instructed parents to inform their children that Congress has checks and balances and that the country’s democracy is safeguarded against “dictatorship.” She also wrote that parents should tell their children how they are going to stand up for the illegal immigrants who may be living in their community or the transgender person down the block. Or how they will comfort anyone who may have been “treated unjustly under Trump’s regime.” 

And it’s no wonder why the U.S. military has seen some of the worst recruitment levels in history. Our future generations have been coddled and turned soft— unless this changes, it will only worsen. 





The Administrative State Is 'Terrified'—and I Couldn't Be Happier


Now that President-elect Donald Trump has won the election, folks on the left are melting down about the prospect that he might immediately begin cleaning house after he takes office. 

Even before Election Day, media outlets published hand-wringing reports detailing how government workers and bureaucrats are terrified at the possibility that they might not have jobs any longer.

There is reason for concern – if you’re a Democrat. Conservative organizations are already laying the groundwork for a mass purge of woke leftists who might use their administrative positions to hamper Trump’s agenda. In fact, there have already been several reports full of ponderous meanderings about what this could mean.

If only the press had shown this level of compassion for everyday Americans who were put in similar positions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

CNN report discussed a “feeling of dread” among federal workers about Trump’s return to office, especially related to his plan to reinstate Schedule F, an executive order that would make it easier for a president to fire employees.

"Trump’s purge could be the biggest change to the federal workforce since the late 1800s, returning the federal government to the 'spoils system' of 1883 when victorious political parties gave government jobs to their supporters," said Max Stier, President of the Partnership for Public Service.”

The article highlighted that many federal employees are struggling with uncertainty months before Trump is set to take office. Boo hoo.

A report from The Guardian published in September promoted the Project 2025 hysteria that the left has been pushing for nearly a year. The article discussed fears that Trump might dismantle the administrative state, replacing merit-based hiring with political loyalty tests.

"If you’re Schedule F and you’re not following the political narrative, you could be fired," said Brian Kelly, an EPA emergency responder.

"Schedule F would have two big effects. One is it will reduce the capacity and performance of the federal government. Second, it will enable democratic backsliding or anti-democratic behavior to become more common," said Donald Moynihan, a public policy professor at the University of Michigan.

Politico published a report explaining that Justice Department employees are “terrified” about the return of Trump. At least some of these individuals worry about facing retaliation for their roles in investigations targeting Trump. "Everyone I’ve talked to...are losing their minds," said a DOJ attorney.

"We’ve all seen this movie before, and it’s going to be worse. It’s just a question of how much worse it’s going to be," said a former DOJ official.

A DOJ attorney said that employees “are terrified that we’ll be replaced with partisan loyalists – not just because our jobs are on the line, but because we know that our democracy and country depend on a government support by a merit-based, apolitical civil service.”

Exactly who do these people think they are fooling? The notion that the bureaucracy is “apolitical” is about as believable as Eric Swalwell claiming he did not sleep with a Chinese spy.

But the pearl-clutching over government employees losing their jobs is rather hilarious considering how the press and their Democrat allies approached people affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. When people were losing their jobs because of vaccine mandates or lockdown orders, they couldn’t even muster a single grain of compassion – even though it created devastating mental, physical, and financial problems for everyday folks who don’t have guaranteed positions of power at the federal government. 


Instead, those who were suffering under government overreach were met with derision from members of the press, who essentially told them to suck it up, wear a mask, and obey. Yet, the suffering was real.

Untold numbers of Americans lost their jobs or were prevented from working because of the state’s reaction to the pandemic. Some were pushed out of work because they refused to take an experimental vaccine. Others could not do their jobs because they were deemed “non-essential” positions.

And members of our once-vaunted Fourth Estate had little to say about it. Instead of questioning the government and speaking truth to power, they gladly parroted the government narrative in the name of public safety.

So, perhaps they should spare us the false indignation. The government needs to be cut. The administrative state must be destroyed. While I don’t yet have much faith that this will happen – even under a Trump administration, it is clear that the federal government has become far too bloated and change is needed. Here’s to hoping that Trump proves me wrong.



MSNBC Guest Who Went After Pete Hegseth Facing Backlash From All Sides

Rebecca Downs reporting for Townhall 

Earlier this week, President-elect Donald Trump selected Pete Hegseth to serve as his Secretary of Defense. The reaction was swift, with the criticism in many cases downright nasty and ugly. MSNBC, which has been taking Trump's win pretty hard and has suffered from plummeting post-election ratings, had on multiple guests who threw Hegseth under the bus by accusing him of being a "white supremacist."

During "All In with Chris Hayes," Sherrilyn Ifill, a lawyer and professor at Howard University, who also served as the former president and director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, made such a claim. 

Ifill also focused on Hegseth's role as a Fox News host, with Hayes jumping in to clarify that he was a "Fox & Friends Weekend" host, which Ifill called "an important distinction," rather than mention how Hegseth is also a decorated veteran. "This is someone who, you know, is known to be a white supremacist, known to be an extremist, whose platform, whose book is basically about his opposition to the advancement of black officers to the top brass," she claimed in a clip that has been circulating. She would later go on to acknowledge that Hegseth is a veteran, but claimed that that "is simply inefficient."

That book, "War on Warriors," which came out earlier this year and which we had a chance to review after interviewing Hegseth, specifically addresses the dangers and concerns of a woke military. Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) have raised such concerns. The lawmakers' report also noted that the military is less extreme than the population. 

There is also one particularly memorable chapter of Hegseth’s book that focuses on the care and concern he had for his fellow National Guardsmen who were black and were targeted by violent mobs shouting racial slurs while they were defending Washington, DC during the 2020 riots. 

In sharing such a clip, Hegseth's co-host, Rachel Campos-Duffy, made clear that Hegseth is no such thing as "a white supremacist," and that she "would certainly know" if he was one. "She deserves to be sued for defamation," Campos-Duffy also posted about Ifill. 

It's not merely Hegseth's co-workers who are speaking out against Ifill's claims, though. Michael LaRose, who served in the Biden-Harris White House and the 2020 campaign, as well as as a spokesperson for First Lady Jill Biden, had some particularly harsh language to condemn Ifill's remarks, which included a lesson for his fellow Democrats.

"Opposing DEI initiatives does not make you a white supremacist. Conversations and demonization like this are a big part of the reason we got our asses kicked," he began in part. 

"Voices like this on the left are turning the Democratic Party into a joke," his post also mentioned. "We’ve got to knock it off and get serious guests who are going to diagnose politics, not make it worse. Name calling, vilifying, and defaming nominees you oppose, even if there is very good reason to oppose them, represents everything the Democratic Party should be RUNNING away from."

LaRose's post also linked to a Mediaite article, which mentioned how Hayes was forced to defend Hegseth on air in a way, as he offered that "I would just say that Hegseth would say that he would deny strenuously he's a white supremacist," adding, "I just wanna put that on the record."

Still, Ifill doubled down further, insisting that it "is absolutely true" that Hegseth "is an extremist."

Then, attorney Maya Wiley went on "The Beat," where she ranted and raved about the Senate's role in confirming Trump's Cabinet picks. 

"And you know, we should say, one of the things that's so important in this function, in this role is the people of this country should have some understanding of who's gonna be making decisions about their daily lives," she mentioned, which is when she directly went after Hegseth. "Because let's remember, when we're talking about the Secretary here, and Hegseth and his white supremacist and extremist tattoos on his body, he is also a person, if he is in this job, will be having a discussion about Donald Trump about sending the military into communities to police U.S. citizens," as she went on an unhinged rant about "warnings" Trump himself has supposedly made. Host Ari Melber could be seen nodding along.

Considering that MSNBC and its anchors--looking at Joy Reid specifically--are in deep trouble, this doesn't seem like the smartest idea to give such guests a platform there. 

It's not just MSNBC, though. Tara Copp and Jason Dearen, both of the Associated Press, went after Hegseth on X for his tattoos and the Christian symbols they represent. 

Vice President-elect and Hegseth himself responded to Copp and her attack on Christians, with Hegseth vowing to put an end to such attacks with him serving as head of the DOD during the second Trump administration.



How Helene Gave Way to ‘Hurricane Snafu’ in the Carolinas

 Hurricane Helene's flooding in western North Carolina prompted criticism of slow government response, with private relief efforts stepping in amid allegations of politically biased aid distribution.

t wasn’t as if the Tar Heel state didn’t see Hurricane Helene coming. On Sept. 25, one day before Helene stormed ashore, North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper declared a state of emergency as the storm’s path showed it churning northward toward Appalachia after making landfall in Florida.

Yet that advance declaration was not followed by any state evacuation orders, and the population largely sheltered in place as Helene hit the steep, wooded hills of western North Carolina, squatting over the area, unleashing more than an inch of water an hour for more than a day. The unprecedented, relentless downpour, falling on ground already saturated by rain the week before, tore old pines and hardwoods out by the roots, creating arboreal torpedoes that rocketed down the steep inclines; water that turned photogenic stony creeks into whitewater torrents, lifting ancient streambed boulders and tossing them like chips on to roads and into homes and buildings. The storm left 230 people dead, nearly half of them in North Carolina, with dozens still missing as of early November.

As residents in Asheville, Chimney Creek, and other smaller communities continue to pick up from the carnage, after-action reports indicate government agencies at the federal and state levels were slow to react. Interviews with several private relief groups that sprang into action after Helene, along with statistics provided by congressional sources, indicate that Cooper’s office and the Biden administration were slow to activate military personnel and assets like helicopters that were critical in the days after the storm. In addition, budgetary moves and internal communications have also drawn questions about how the Federal Emergency Management Agency is spending its money and how it envisioned its purpose in a Biden administration suffused with “diversity, equity and inclusion” mandates.

FEMA is also wrestling with revelations that politics had influenced some of its relief efforts. The agency fired a staffer who told crews to avoid houses in storm-damaged parts of Florida that displayed Donald Trump campaign signs. The dismissed worker said this week her orders were not an isolated incident and that FEMA avoided “politically hostile” zones in the Carolinas, too.

“There seems to have been a priority shift, period,” said Eric Eggers, the vice president of the conservative Government Accountability Institute. “It seems impossible to separate its mission creep and its ideological pursuit of an agenda when its duties are to fix that bridge or clear that road.”

As devastating and increasingly expensive natural disasters continue to be a fact of life in the United States, FEMA’s halting response, especially in the early days after Helene, when lives were in jeopardy, suggests both the capabilities and limits of state and federal responses.

In the first days, survivors told RCI that the impact of governments’ slow-footed efforts was countered by the heroic efforts of private citizens and groups who rushed to provide help. As FEMA and others began to assert themselves, some conflicts arose between government representatives and volunteers, although everyone RCI spoke with agreed that such disasters inevitably spawn chaos. There is no such thing as a “perfect response,” but many people said the one following Helene teaches important lessons.

Helene didn’t slam into western North Carolina the way hurricanes typically do, but instead squatted like an angry demon over the region in which the economically important fall tourist season was just swinging into gear.

In Avery County, a parks and recreation gymnasium had been set up as a shelter with approximately 40 beds and generators for backup power, according to Jamie Shell, the editor of the weekly Avery Journal-Times and a lifelong Tar Heel.

“On the day prior to the storm, we were in touch with the county emergency management office and county manager to get a feel for where they were in terms of initial response,” he said. “I remember a number of generated auto-calls and emails from the county to the county residents informing them of the historic and potentially devastating nature of the event, warning people to make plans to seek higher ground and evacuate as needed due to the torrential rains and damaging winds that would arrive.”

By Friday morning, Shell said people were fending off the elements as best they could.

“It was a case where most everyone who were not necessary (emergency) personnel were pretty much sheltering in place, as roads were being littered with fallen trees and high water, with the worst damage along creeks and rivers,” he said.

Power soon went out, making communication difficult for both survivors and potential rescue efforts, and creeks crested, complicating overland travel. Shell said some roads remained passable, but without power or an aerial view, it was impossible for people to find shelter if their homes were damaged or lost, and for relief efforts that didn’t have small planes or helicopters to get to wrecked spots, and even then potential landing zones were unclear.

Here, too, politics has emerged to cloud the relief picture. Shell said he relied on a Starlink hookup, the satellite company launched and owned by Elon Musk, and that county officials were also reliant on Musk’s system. Private relief agencies told RCI that Starlink provided thousands of Starlinks, which they distributed via helicopter after Helene, offering torn-up zones their only method of communication.

Between them, the United Cajun Navy and Operation Helo, two of the private groups that operated rescue and relief operations with helicopters, distributed nearly 1,000 Starlink hookups to powerless homes. Musk trumpeted the fact that Starlink’s services would be free in the remainder of 2024 for Helene and Hurricane Milton victims, although there are reports users are still being hit with hardware starter costs.

Such assistance from Starlink might have been greater, according to some congressional sources, had the Federal Communications Commission not canceled an $885.5 million deal with Starlink to expand rural broadband access. Instead, the Biden administration sunk $42 billion into a rural broadband access program that has not hooked up any customers – a failure that dogged Vice President Kamala Harris in her failed presidential campaign – as Harris was the point person on that project.

Some Republican officials in Washington have grumbled that Cooper and the Biden administration moved too slowly in terms of activating the National Guard or the huge U.S. Army assets at Fort Liberty, formerly Fort Bragg, in North Carolina. Information provided by the state to Congress and shared with RCI shows the state’s “rotor and fixed-wing aircraft” made available rose from fewer than 10 in the storm’s initial 48 hours to 20 by Sept. 30, but it stayed at that number for three full days. North Carolina Highway Patrol provided fewer than five helicopters through Oct. 9.

Congressional sources also provided information showing there were fewer than 1,000 troops available for relief efforts until Oct. 3.

Private relief agencies, untangled by orders, swung into action more quickly.

“When I got there, all I heard was, ‘Where’s FEMA? Where’s FEMA?” said Brian Trascher, a leader of the United Cajun Navy, a private disaster relief outfit that formed in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005. “In fact, FEMA moves fairly quickly once they know where the problem is but otherwise everything was a cluster-f___. They didn’t have anything prepositioned and so for about four or five days, most of the search and rescue was done by private people.”

But Trascher offered praise to FEMA, too. He had been meeting with FEMA officials in Washington as Helene approached, part of an ongoing effort by the feds and the Cajun Navy to cooperate better in response to disasters. It is not true that FEMA was invisible in Helene’s immediate aftermath – Trascher said he ran into a top official he knows within hours of his arrival in North Carolina – and FEMA staff on the ground were committed and hard-working, he said.

That take was echoed by others deeply involved in the first few days of Helene’s response. Of the four private relief groups that discussed the situation with RCI, all agreed FEMA officials in western North Carolina were earnest, but said both the federal bureaucracy and the military response proved creaky.

The air over the Helene-ravaged landscape was wide open in the first few days, and the private helicopters were free to go wherever they could. That began to change once federal agencies came into the picture. The Federal Aviation Agency did give out some “squawk codes” to the flyers working with private groups, Trascher said, but more codes and a better-coordinated response with the FAA are needed going forward, according to Trascher and Eric Robinson, a co-founder of Operation Helo.

The private relief executives also expressed doubts that FEMA had the most experienced hands on deck. In addition, although many National Guardsmen in the area are native Tar Heels and were champing at the bit to help, they were repeatedly snarled by delays in orders, according to several people familiar with the first days of response.

“We ran it like a military op,” Robinson said of Operation Helo, a group based in North Carolina that was born in Helene’s aftermath. “But the strength of the storm, the amount of water, I don’t think anyone anticipated that.”

Robinson described whole towns annihilated, saying there were lakes “that it looked like you could walk across, there was so much debris floating.” His team distributed more than 517 Starlinks and was also assisted personally by Ivanka Trump in the week after Helene struck.

At one point, Robinson said there were people marooned on a hilltop, and his group asked the National Guard to handle the job. Though more than willing, the guardsmen had to wait more than three hours for their orders. “We just went and got them in the meantime,” he said.

Another group distributing emergency aid and Starlinks was Samaritan’s Purse, the international relief agency whose Boone headquarters left it literally at Helene’s ground zero.

“We all knew the storm was coming and we were ready,” said Franklin Graham, the group’s president and chief executive. “But none of us were prepared for the infrastructure’s collapse.”

Like other private officials involved in relief efforts, Graham was far from biting in his criticism of FEMA and North Carolina agencies. Similarly, he acknowledged, as Trascher and Robinson did, that private groups enjoyed freedom from the red tape that customarily snarls government bureaucracies.

“I do think FEMA might be better if it wasn’t run by a political appointee,” Graham said. “It was working in our favor initially that there were no rules, and what we saw was a true example of neighbors helping neighbors.”

As of early November, FEMA said it had spent “approximately $4.3 billion on Hurricane Helene response and recovery.” Of that total, some $213 million went in direct assistance to 126,000 North Carolina households, with another $202 million “for debris removal and reimbursement of emergency protective measures for the state.”

Helene also brought new attention to FEMA’s budgeting. Even as they pushed money out to storm victims, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, who oversees FEMA, and other Biden administration officials began raising alarms that the agency could run short on hurricane relief money.

But along with those calls came revelations from Homeland Security’s watchdog Inspector General that the agency was sitting on $73 billion in unliquidated funds committed to previous disasters – including  $8.3 billion for those declared in 2012 or earlier. The agency has also spent nearly $4 billion on COVID relief in September, the same month as Helene – including for funeral expenses, vaccination and testing sites, and personal protective equipment. That spending was paused in September to shift money to its Immediate Needs Funding, FEMA said, but it acknowledged $3.8 billion was “obligated” for the virus that peaked in 2021.

Gov. Cooper’s office also pushed back against reports it may have been tardy in calling up the National Guard or responding to hard-hit zones.

“The North Carolina National Guard was activated and on the ground before, during and after the storm and we believe this was the fastest and largest integration of active-duty military soldiers under Title 10 working with the National Guard in North Carolina history,” said Jordan Monaghan, a spokesman for the governor. “Immediately following the storm, staged equipment and personnel began moving into western NC, using Asheville’s airport as a staging area where supplies were flown in, loaded onto helicopters and flown into counties that couldn’t be reached by road. Where roads were passable, supplies were delivered by truck.”

On Sept. 30, Cooper asked Biden to “make all necessary federal resources available,” and that so-called “Title 10” request was approved by the Defense Department on Oct. 2, according to Monaghan. At that point, helicopters and other key assets took to wing.

Both FEMA and Cooper’s office stressed the unprecedented nature of Helene, and that view was echoed by Trascher, who said some of the areas the Cajun Navy serviced were “the worst I’d seen since Katrina.”

As of early November, power outages had fallen from more than 1 million to fewer than 900, while roughly 1,000 of the 1,300 closed roads have been opened, according to Cooper’s office. All told, there have been “2,024 FEMA workers and thousands of Department of Transportation workers, utility workers, law enforcement officers and volunteers on the ground.”

Yet under the Biden administration’s “whole of government” emphasis on diversity, equity, and inclusion, there are indications FEMA has moved away from a broad-based relief template.

In the past two weeks, FEMA also became embroiled in the scandal surrounding the orders of the now-dismissed staffer that Hurricane Milton relief crews should bypass homes displaying Trump campaign signs. The former supervisor, Marn’i Washington, told The Black Star Group’s digital platform that her orders were not an isolated incident. Instead, they reflected long-standing agency policy that calls for avoidance of areas or homes it considers “politically hostile.”

“FEMA always preaches avoidance first and then de-escalation, so this is not isolated,” she said. “This is a colossal event of avoidance not just in the state of Florida, but you will find avoidance in the Carolinas.”

In an in-house 2023 Zoom meeting that has received renewed attention, FEMA and other federal officers focused on how disasters allegedly hit the LGBTQ community with special fury. In that meeting, FEMA Emergency Management Specialist Tyler Atkins said LGBTQ people and others who have been disadvantaged “already are struggling,” and natural disasters compound their struggles.

Maggie Jarry, a Senior Emergency Management Specialist with the Department of Health and Human Services, then chimed in, saying emergency management in the U.S. must shift from prioritizing “the greatest good for the greatest amount of people” to “disaster equity.”

“We have to look at policies and understand to what extent they have disadvantaged communities that have less assets, communities that have pre-existing vulnerabilities in accessing disaster-related recovery supports,” Jarry said.

A FEMA spokesperson told RCI that any notion the agency has lost touch with its core mission is false.

“FEMA’s mission remains clear and unchanged – to help people before, during, and after disasters,” he said. “We are fully committed to ensuring that all communities have the support they need to prepare for and recover from disasters. FEMA’s disaster response efforts and recovery programs are funded through the Disaster Relief Fund, which is a dedicated fund for disaster efforts. Disaster Relief Fund money has not been diverted to other, non-disaster related efforts.”

FEMA’s Helene response enjoyed considerably better coverage than it received during Hurricane Katrina in 2005 when media accounts blistered the agency and the Bush administration for weeks. This time around, there were many stories outlining what FEMA does and does not do, with the former primarily involving reimbursement to state and local projects for debris removal, reconstruction, and the like. It also provides cash to survivors in the immediate aftermath of declared disasters.

Many media outlets also magnified FEMA’s attempt to combat “misinformation,” and these reports frequently blamed the Trump campaign for spreading unfounded rumors. At one point, FEMA even paused relief operations in parts of North Carolina over unfounded rumors that vigilantes were “hunting” FEMA workers.

Those pro-FEMA slants lost considerable traction last week, however, when the story broke about FEMA relief teams in Florida deliberately bypassing homes that displayed support for Trump’s campaign.

All of these threads – the Biden administration’s “Justice40” for diversity, equity, and inclusion; the spending on matters unrelated to natural disasters or tied up in endless projects going nowhere; federal contracts to help rural America canceled – add up to an unsavory “politics of disaster relief,” according to the Government Accountability Institute.

Eggers and Peter Schweizer, the Institute’s leader, examined the problem in a recent podcast by that name. What happened after Helene is further evidence of that problem, Eggers said.

“In some ways, it’s a triumph of the human and American spirit, but in other ways, it seems like a failure of the American government,” he said.

This article was originally published by RealClearInvestigations and made available via RealClearWire.https://amgreatness.com/2024/11/17/how-helene-gave-way-to-hurricane-snafu-in-the-carolinas/