Wednesday, November 6, 2024

Commentary

 

This was not supposed to happen.

If the laws of nature had acted as they normally do, Donald Trump would have died in July, murdered in cold blood because, deep down, his enemies knew that was the only way to prevent American voters from choosing him as their leader.

Trump’s impetuous head tilt that day, impossible to explain as anything other than an act of God, is the sole reason America still stands as the world’s most viable republic. It allowed Trump to be chosen by the people, not some machine puppet to rise to power who only really had the backing of the pre-established elite.

Only in this country can a man so deeply hated by the aristocratic political, business, and media establishments twice rise to become the electorate’s leader. Only here could he be subjected to countless investigations, impeachments, arrests, and physical threats and still be chosen once again as the people’s champion.

Democrat and media fearmongers have spent years saying a Trump victory would mark the end of democracy. They’re wrong. It represents its saving. The president-elect’s triumph serves as undeniable proof that America, despite its imperfections, is among the only countries in the history of the world legitimately governed by, of, and for the people.

God alone is to thank.





X22, And we Know, and the sweet sound of victory! - Nov 6



In 1 night, we took back the WH, took back the Senate, possibly holding the House, and have now caused the biggest troll on this site to now live in a red state...

How about all this winning, yo?! πŸ˜‚πŸŽ‰ 

Payback is sooooo rich, especially after putting up with all the lies and the smear jobs for so long.

 ----------------

Once again, I'm very thankful for all your support! Getting to have so much fun with politics this year has been 1 of the greatest experiences of my life! Maybe someday soon, I'll get to share some long awaited NCIS Verse news with you all. (Gut is still telling me that sometime before next summer, Hetty will resurface!)

Kamala Campaign Manager Vows to Kneecap Trump Presidency

 Shortly after Vice President Kamala Harris called President-elect Donald Trump to concede the 2024 race for the White House Wednesday afternoon, failed campaign manager Jen O'Malley Dillon sent an email to staffers about next steps. 

"Just a few moments ago, the Vice President connected with President Trump to concede the race. In the call, she told him that she would work with President Biden to ensure a peaceful transfer of power," the email states. "She also made clear that she hopes he will be a President for all Americans."

"I don't have words to express the gratitude I have for everyone getting this email. You left everything on the field. You built a first-rate, historic Presidential campaign in basically 90 days. You navigated things that no one has ever had to navigate, and likely no one will ever have to again," she continued. "You stared down unprecedented headwinds and obstacles that were largely out of our control."

After thanking staffers for their work on the short campaign, a result of forcing President Joe Biden out of the race in July, the email states it's time to "protect America from the impacts of a Trump Presidency."

"I'll leave you with this: losing is unfathomably painful. It is hard. This will take a long time to process. But the work of protecting America from the impacts of a Trump Presidency starts now. I know the Vice President isn't finished in this fight, and I know the very people on this email are also going to be leaders in this collective mission. View this as the beginning, not the end. It will be hard work. But as the boss says: hard work is good work. And I look forward to standing beside you," O'Malley Dillon vowed, admitting the country moved to the right towards Trump and away from Harris' candidacy.  

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2024/11/06/kamala-campaign-letter-vows-to-kneecap-trump-presidency-n2647400

Democrats - Challenge 2024 Electoral Votes ? - Could this happen ?

 

  1. Kamala Harris: As the Democratic nominee for President, Harris would likely challenge the Electoral College votes if the results do not favor her. According to the search results, Harris has been gaining ground in swing states like Pennsylvania, and her campaign has been actively contesting the results in key battlegrounds.
  2. Joe Biden: Although Biden is not the nominee in the 2024 election, his 2020 victory in Pennsylvania (where he won by a narrow margin) may be relevant in any potential challenges to the 2024 Electoral College votes. Biden’s campaign team may provide guidance or support to Harris’s challenge efforts, given their shared party affiliation and familiarity with the electoral process.

It’s essential to note that the actual challenges to the Electoral College votes would depend on the specific circumstances of the 2024 election, including the outcome in each state and any potential disputes or controversies that may arise. The search results do not provide explicit information on potential challenges from specific Democratic officials or organizations.

In the event of a challenge, the process would involve:

  1. State-by-state contests: Challenges would focus on specific states where the outcome is disputed, with the goal of overturning the certified electoral votes.
  2. Federal courts: Challenges would be filed in federal courts, which would review the evidence and make decisions on the validity of the electoral votes.
  3. U.S. Supreme Court: The losing party could appeal to the Supreme Court, which would have the final say in resolving any disputes.

Ultimately, the success of any challenges would depend on the strength of the evidence and the legal arguments presented, as well as the willingness of courts to intervene in the electoral process.

 


🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 


Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Trump's win is a referendum on men competing in women's sports—even MSNBC admits it

 Trump and Republicans ran ads opposing men in women's sports in nearly every state.

IMO - Forget the NY State proposition, a Trojan's horse to subvert Title IX. which is a Federal rule. Trump will reinvigorate and cancel Biden's changes !

President-elect Donald Trump won a decisive victory on Tuesday, and while Democrat pundits try to figure out what would make Americans vote the bad orange man into a second term in the White House, some woke up on Wednesday and realized that there's one culture war battle that Trump and his supporters have decisively won: keeping men out of women's sports. 

This was barely an issue at the national level when Trump ran in 2016 on a promise to deal with border security, and while Democrats were planning to remake Title IX to allow men to compete in women's sports in 2020, and many women, who were clued in to what was really going on with the trans takeover of women's identities, were screaming out to be heard, it was not yet an issue for the GOP.



Now, after thousands of women have lost opportunities, awards, scholarships and victories to men who claim to be women in virtually every sport, Republican moms and dads have finally spoken out. Trump and Republicans ran ads opposing men in women's sports in nearly every state and have said outright that men, no matter what they claim to be, do not belong in women's locker rooms or in women's competition.

On MSNBC's Morning Joe on Wednesday, Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski spoke about the issue as though it was the first they were hearing of it. They brought up an article from the Washington Post's Matt Bai, in which he said that he was "somewhat mystified" by Trump's win. He said that "Democrats dug themselves into a hole on cultural issues and identity politics," and that "Trump’s vicious transgender ad in the closing weeks ('She’s for they/them, he’s for you') was probably the most effective of the cycle."



Scarborough leaned into that as well, making the claim that he'd been speaking out against the trend and legal requirements to allow men to play in women's sports all along. He spoke about the culture war issues, saying that Democrat parents of college-age kids have been telling him that those kids are afraid to speak up at school and in class for fear of saying the wrong thing and being canceled or ostracized. "It's having an impact," he said. The ad got so much play that some of the trans athletes who were featured it in spoke out, saying they feared for their lives. 



"From the trans ad, to yeah, the athletics. By the way, by the way, as we've said on the show 1,000 times, Democrats should be smarter on the women's athletics thing. 85 percent of Americans oppose men transitioning after puberty and competing against women. And I'm not just saying this the day after the election. I've been saying this for years. This is not a hard call. You can show compassion and you can show grace. And as the Republican governor of Utah said, let's figure out a way to do this. But one way we don't do this is by allowing men who transition after puberty competing against young girls who have been working their entire lives to be as good as they can be, and then they get destroyed in the pool, on the track."

The Biden-Harris administration remade Title IX and the Civil Rights Act retroactively to conflate gender with biological sex. This extended protections that had been put legislatively in place to protect women from men. Those men have, in recent years, been using those protections to claim to be women and compete against women in athletic events from amateur and intramural levels all the way up to the Olympics. Men have used those protections to stake their claims to women's locker rooms and bathrooms, whether in elementary, middle, or high school settings up to university levels, gyms and spas. When women have spoken out against these things, saying that they felt their privacy was violated, authorities, lawmakers, businesses and officials have told the women they were transphobic, have shut them up, revoked their gym memberships, and made them watch as men walk off with their trophies.

The Trump mandate gives the administration free rein to overturn those changes Biden made and to strip the agencies that have penalized and punished women of the power to do so and of the power to implement and foist these lies on Americans.

https://thepostmillennial.com/trumps-win-is-a-referendum-on-men-competing-in-womens-sports-even-msnbc-admits-it

RCMP to create fake online personas, accounts to target Canadian 'extremists'

 "The RCMP's lack of a covert online presence was previously highlighted in the OIR, which recommended that the RCMP develop its own online undercover program to assist with national security criminal investigations," the RCMP said in the document.

The RCMP wants to spy on Canadian “extremists” with fake online personas, according to an internal document from the national police force, CBC reported, noting that “experts” in ideologically motivated violent extremism (IMVE) are applauding the plan because online threats could become reality.

But civil liberty defenders say the strategy could be a means of police entrapment and a violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights. Canada’s privacy commissioner flagged the RCMP for its online investigations and are demanding that the RCMP be subject to judicial oversight. The Canadian Security Intelligence Service is also committed to spying on social conservatives who support parental rights and oppose gender ideology and child sex changes.

The internal strategy document, dated April 2024, was released as a result of an Access to Information request and shared with CBC.

"The RCMP's lack of a covert online presence was previously highlighted in the OIR (Operational Improvement Review), which recommended that the RCMP develop its own online undercover program to assist with national security criminal investigations," the RCMP internal document stated.

"Federal Policing National Security (FPNS) is currently taking steps to address this recommendation through proactive legend-building and backstopping personas, but this work needs to be prioritized and accelerated in order to meet future demand for online undercover activities."

The document added, "Should Federal Policing expand its online undercover and intelligence capacity in the IMVE space, there will be a need for additional online personas, monikers, and information technology equipment to sustain these activities."

Rebel News publisher Ezra Levant condemned the plan on Monday night’s episode of The Ezra Levant Show, saying that the policy leaves the door open for the RCMP to investigate "anything from white supremacists and neo-Nazis to far-left environmental and animal rights organizations” but it will likely focus on the pet enemies of the Trudeau government.

"Is the RCMP, with these riots, and an antisemitic crime wave, and these Hamas encampments, are they really worried about animal rights organizations or Steven Guilbeault's Greenpeace?" he asked.

"I don't think so, but that's what the CBC wants us to focus on. They're of course talking about conservatives, probably talking about truckers," said Levant, noting that the national police would rather target ideological opponents of the government than rising crime, growing antisemitism or violent protests.

"This goes on every single weekend, terrorist supporters in my city of Toronto go right into the heart of Jewish communities, flying swastikas, flying flags of banned terrorist groups, calling for a genocide, no problem. The police are their escorts," he said.

https://thepostmillennial.com/rcmp-to-create-fake-online-personas-accounts-to-target-canadian-extremists

Trump Wins. And Reality Bites.

 Donald Trump has gone from convict to the 47th president of the United States. It’s a comeback unlike any other in American history. How did it happen?

(I wonder - What will happen with the lawfare trials now?)

We’re sitting down to write this at 2 a.m., and by now it’s clear: Donald Trump is set to be the 47th president of the United States, and on track to win the electoral college and the popular vote. It is a stunning comeback.

The red wave that wasn’t in 2022 came crashing down tonight. Republicans have retaken control of the Senate. Control of Congress is still in the balance.

Going into tonight, Nate Silver ran 80,000 simulations of what could happen. In 40,012 of them, Kamala Harris won. Every pollster and pundit said the same: It was gonna be a squeaker. Too close to call. We wouldn’t know for days, maybe even weeks!

That’s not how it went down. Not at all.

Trump had won Pennsylvania before the night was out. And by 2:30 in the morning, he was onstage, surrounded by his family and Dana White, delivering his victory speech in West Palm Beach. 

Tonight at our election party, the British historian Simon Sebag Montefiore said he hadn’t seen a comeback like this since Charles de Gaulle. But perhaps the only American echo of tonight is Richard Nixon. As Commentary editor John Podhoretz wrote on Twitter: “This is the most staggering political comeback in American history. Period. Nixon has held the comeback trophy for nearly 60 years. No longer.”

Why Trump won so convincingly—and why Kamala lost so fully—are themes we’ll cover over the coming weeks. But for now, enough from us. 

Somehow, after livestreaming for six hours, we have a packed Front Page on this historic day beginning with our Eli Lake on How Trump Won. 

Here’s Eli:

Donald Trump ended his first term in disgrace, hit with a second impeachment after his supporters stormed the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The 2022 midterm candidates he endorsed—Herschel Walker, Mehmet Oz, Kari Lake—all went down in flames. In 2023, he was declared guilty of sexually assaulting the writer E. Jean Carroll in a civil case. This past May, he was convicted in a Manhattan court on 34 felony counts for improperly reporting hush money payments. Overall, he has faced 116 indictments. Even now, the New York State attorney general is trying to punish the Trump Organization with nearly $500 million in fines, claiming that he unlawfully inflated the value of his properties. 

And yet here he is: America’s 47th president. 

How did he do it? 

Read Eli Lake: “How Trump Won.” 


“We Blew It, Joe” 

This race was the Democrats’ to lose. And they blew it. Badly. As of 2 a.m., there wasn’t a single state in the country in which Harris outperformed Joe Biden’s 2020 numbers. What went wrong? Peter Savodnik has some ideas. 

“They didn’t lose because they didn’t spend enough money,” writes Peter. “They didn’t lose because they failed to trot out enough celebrity influencers. They lost because they were consumed by their own self-flattery, their own sense of self-importance.” 

And above all else, they lost because they lied. “They seemed to think that Americans wouldn’t mind that they had pretended Joe Biden was ‘sharp as a tack,’ that they actually orchestrated a behind-the-scenes switcheroo, that the party that portrayed itself as the nation’s answer to fascism nominated its standard-bearer without consulting a single voter.” 

Last night, the truth caught up with them. 

Read Peter Savodnik: “We Blew It, Joe!

We’re Going to Be Okay

Deep breath. In the run-up to last night, we heard a lot about how this was going to be the last American election—from both sides. Oprah Winfrey, speaking Monday evening at Kamala’s last rally in Philadelphia, said: “If we don’t show up tomorrow, it is entirely possible that we will not have the opportunity to cast a ballot again.” Elon Musk tweeted to his more than 200 million followers: “Very few Americans realize that, if Trump is NOT elected, this will be the last election.”

We call bullshit.

America is going to be okay. 

Read our editorial: Repeat After Us: This Is Not the Last Election.”

The presidential race was only one of last night’s shocking stories. Here are some of the others: 

  • After four years in the minority, Republicans have regained control of the Senate—as many expected ahead of the election. Their new majority was solidified as Republican Jim Justice won Joe Manchin’s seat in West Virginia, political outsider and MAGA whisperer Bernie Moreno defeated incumbent Sherrod Brown in Ohio, Ted Cruz won in his third competitive race for reelection, and Deb Fischer secured reelection in an unexpectedly close Nebraska race.
  • The battle for the House may not be settled for days, but it’s possible the Republicans could cling to control, setting the stage for a unified GOP in Washington. Here’s a smattering of the closest races that may hand the House to the Republicans: In Iowa, Rep. Zach Nunn held on to his seat in a race Democrats viewed as flippable; and in the increasingly red suburbs of NYC, New York Rep. Mike Lawler staved off a challenge from progressive Democrat Mondaire Jones. 
  • In a scene reminiscent of Hillary Clinton’s distraught voters in 2016, Harris’s supporters left her increasingly dour election night watch party in tears as the candidate delayed her address until Wednesday afternoon. Biden did not attend the party, according to White House officials, in yet another indication of the distance placed between the incumbent and his vice president: “Tonight, the president and First Lady will watch election results in the White House residence with longtime aides and senior White House staff.” 
  • Florida’s abortion amendment failed, leaving the state’s six-week ban in place. The current law, supported by Republican governor Ron DeSantis, has exceptions for rape, incest, human trafficking, and the life of the mother. The amendment would have enshrined a right to an abortion any time before viability—roughly 24 weeks of pregnancy—and any time after when recommended by a healthcare provider. Abortion advocates outspent their opponents 8 to 1. But they needed 60 percent of the vote. In the end they got 57 percent, with 43 voting against. (ICYMI: Read Olivia Reingold on “How Abortion Became ‘the Defund the Police of the GOP.’ ”) A separate amendment to legalize marijuana also failed in the Sunshine State.
  • Prop 36, California’s tough-on-crime amendment, passed with overwhelming support. The ballot measure reverses Prop 47, a 2014 law that downgraded felonies like thefts of under $950 and drug violations to misdemeanors. Los Angeles district attorney George GascΓ³n, a mastermind behind Prop 47, lost to law-and-order candidate Nathan Hochman.  
  • New York passed Proposition 1, ostensibly a bill to enshrine abortion rights, but really a Trojan horse allowing biological males into female spaces. (ICYMI: Read Josh Code for The Free Press on what this anti-equality measure means for the Big Apple.)
  • Massachusetts failed to pass a ballot measure that would have legalized psychedelics, including psilocybin (mushrooms) and DMT. If the ballot measure had passed, the state would have joined Oregon and Colorado as the third state in the nation to legalize the recreational use of psychedelics.
  • Ann Selzer ate her words after she hung her reputation on an especially optimistic Iowa poll this weekend that showed Harris leading the state by three points. She told The Daily Beast: “I’ll be reviewing data from multiple sources with hopes of learning why that happened. And, I welcome what that process might teach me.”

If you missed our Free Press livestream—thanks to the hundreds of thousands of you who tuned in!—you can watch it here. There were a lot more people in the green room, and we couldn’t pass up an opportunity to get them on the record on the burning issues. . . 

Who will win World War III? 

“America, baby.” —Coleman Hughes

“Trick question. There will be no World War III.” —Michael Shellenberger 

“Israel.” —Dasha Nekrasova 

“China.” —Jesse Singal 

“I’m hoping that Donald Trump becomes president, and we don’t find out, because I don’t think it will happen if he’s president for four years. But there’s one thing that the democracies have shown—that they’re very slow to recognize threats—but once they are mobilized, they win.” —Matt Continetti 

“Assuming we get India on our side, the Western world.”
—Brianna Wu

What have you changed your mind about since the last election? 

“I think Trump’s gotten creepier since 2020. I think he’s gotten more vengeful. I think he’s gotten angrier, even though I think he’s got more reason to be angry.” —Rikki Schlott

“Tech censorship and the danger it poses to democracy. I think in 2020 I was a little bit more accepting that the tech companies as private entities had the right to police discourse. But in the years since, I’ve seen that they wield an almost government-like power that I think needs to be held in check.” —Matt Continetti 

“In 2020 I was like, oh, the Democratic Party is just the party of the professional managerial elite, but Bidenism has been interesting economically.” —Sohrab Ahmari 

“I’ve decided not to panic over the possibility of a Donald Trump victory because I did that in 2016. I can’t really get there emotionally this time. I just feel dead inside.”
—Kat Rosenfield

 

On what the next president should do to unite America: 

“Chill the fuck out.” —Jesse Singal

“Make clear he doesn’t hate the other half of the country.”
—Coleman Hughes

“Focus on posterity instead of populism.” —Peter Meijer

“Promise to protect pet squirrels from government overreach.” —Kat Rosenfield

“Lower taxes.” —Adam Rubenstein

 

The biggest gaffe of the election? 

“Kamala Harris choosing Tim Walz instead of Josh Shapiro.” —Nellie Bowles

“Kamala lying about working at McDonald’s.” —Dasha Nekrasova

“Tony Hinchcliffe and Joe Biden had the biggest impact on this election—other than the names on the ticket—because by not bowing out gracefully sooner, he set her up in a position to look dishonest no matter what she said.” —Noam Dworman 

“The Biden campaign.” —Rikki Schlott

What do you make of our vice president–elect? 

“J.D. Vance is one of the most pernicious and pathetic figures in American politics and culture.” —Nick Gillespie 

“J.D. Vance is a thoughtful, conscientious, patriotic, decent person who learns, adapts, and course-corrects.” —Reihan Salam 

“J.D. Vance is disturbingly hot.” —Brianna Wu

“J.D. Vance is held back by his loyalty to Trump.” —Coleman Hughes 

“The only person at Yale worth knowing.” —Catherine Herridge

 

Why did Trump win? 

“The more you learn about Kamala, the less you like. Maybe she should have been hiding in the basement.”
—Catherine Herridge

“Immigration. He’s the strongest anti-immigration president we’ve had in decades. At the same time, we had the biggest immigration crisis we’ve had. So 2 + 2 = 4.”
—Coleman Hughes 

Maybe because of the border. Maybe it’s because of Kamala’s personality. And she also did kind of a terrible job at being vice president.” —Josie Savodnik, age 9 

CORRECTION: A previous version of The Front Page incorrectly said there wasn’t a single county in the country in which Kamala Harris outperformed Donald Trump. In fact, there wasn’t a single state in the country in which Harris outperformed Joe Biden’s 2020 numbers by 3 percent or more. This has been updated. The Free Press regrets the error.


Walz Claims Military Record ‘Speaks For Itself,’ But The Army Still Won’t Release It



Democrat vice presidential candidate Gov. Tim Walz said his military record “speaks for itself.” So the Federalist asked the Army for his papers — but with election day here, officials still have not released them.

“We have not received clearance to release the records,” an Army staffer said to The Federalist Nov. 4.

The Federalist had asked if the Army would release Walz’s records by the presidential election, citing the “urgent public interest.” The Federalist first requested Walz’s personnel file and discharge papers Aug. 14, nearly three months ago, and since then has asked for an updated release date eight times with no success. Walz has faced allegations of lying about his military record for years.

In early September, an Army staffer at Fort Knox said the records were “in the review process.” Nearly a month passed before the next update.

“We expect to release responsive records upon completion of our higher headquarters review,” the staffer said Oct. 1. The Federalist asked Oct. 24 if the Army would release Walz’s records by election day, and the staffer said he does “not know.”

Multiple veterans have accused Walz of stolen valor, and the governor has been caught several times lying about his record. 

Walz has often referred to himself as a retired command sergeant major — but the Harris campaign had to remove the rank from its website. In fact, Walz was conditionally promoted to the rank, but the rank was revoked when he failed to meet his obligatory service, as The Federalist previously reported. He retired from the Minnesota National Guard in 2005, dodging his unit’s deployment to Iraq. 

The vice presidential candidate also lied about reenlisting in the National Guard after 9/11. The Federalist did the math, and Walz was not even eligible to retire — much less reenlist — until November 2001, at the very least.

While campaigning for governor in 2018, Walz claimed to have carried a “weapon of war” — an assault-style rifle — “in war.” Since Walz was never deployed to a combat zone, his campaign says he “misspoke.” As far back as 2009, a veteran confronted the staff of then-Rep. Walz, claiming he committed stolen valor.



Did you hear the latest Elections BC debacle?

Hey Ross ...

Did you hear the latest Elections BC debacle?

You may have already heard yesterday that BC Elections announced they found an entire ballot box that went unaccounted for in last month’s provincial election that BC Conservatives narrowly lost.

They also reported about 14 uncounted votes in a riding the NDP won over the Conservatives by just 27 votes.

Well, guess what: they’ve released another update, claiming that, actually, it’s not 14 votes — it’s 28 votes!

What’s going on? That’s enough to flip a riding from NDP to Conservative.

In BC’s 93-seat legislature, the NDP won 47 ridings, the Conservatives won 44, and the Greens won 2. The NDP’s 47 seats were all needed to represent a majority government.

If the Conservatives were to flip one of the ridings, giving the NDP 46 seats, the NDP would no longer hold absolute control over British Columbia's government. In other words, Premier Eby’s NDP would require votes from the Greens or Conservatives to pass legislation. 

And more importantly, who is to trust Elections BC at this point in time? First they claim they’ve counted all the votes in a riding, then they say they missed 14, and then they say actually it’s 28? 

Who is to say more unaccounted for votes haven’t yet been “found”? 

It gets worse than that, though. 

Last month, it was discovered that Elections BC let election workers take UNCOUNTED ballots to their PERSONAL HOMES.

Now, Elections BC has revealed uncounted ballots during their personal review, but Conservative leader John Rustad is calling for an independent review of this entire mess.