Monday, September 2, 2024

The Committee’s Candidate: Harris’s Inconsistent Campaign


So on Thursday, Kamala Harris was finally allowed out to meet the press.

Well, she was allowed to sit for about 18 minutes for a carefully scripted interview on a Dem-friendly network—CNN—with a partisan media head—Dana Bash—who came with a satchel of softballs. Apparently, Harris has yet to be certified for solo flight, however, since she was chaperoned by her pick for VP, Minnesota governor and serial fantasist Tim Walz.

How did it go? The journalist Jon Concha put it delicately but not inaccurately when he described it as a “dishonest train wreck.”

As an aside, I might note that if our media censors had their way, phrases like “dishonest train wreck” would probably be sanctioned as “hurtful,” maybe even “hateful,” “disinformation” or “malinformation,” the latter meaning statements that may be true but are nonetheless unacceptable because they are embarrassing to the powers that be.

“The powers that be”: who are they?  In a way, that is the basic, fundamental question with which the cackling campaign of Kamala Harris confronts us. Many commentators, including me, have noted the profoundly undemocratic maneuver with which The Committee erased Joe Biden and installed Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee.  After all, nearly 15 million people voted for Gibbering Joe in the Democratic primary.  He won, hands down because that same committee made certain that other candidates—including RFK Jr.— were shunted to one side.  They had done the same thing to Bernie Sanders years before. “Democracy” for them is the name not of a political system but of a pleasing emotional shudder.

Another aside: I see that The Committee is currently road-testing “joy” as an adjunct to “democracy,” though to my ear, the slogan “Strength Through Joy” has more resonance in the original German: Kraft durch Freude.  Perhaps, for now, anyway, such candor is still a bridge too far.  I wonder if The Committee is cognizant of the, er, rich historical emanations and penumbras of the phrase?

During the brief interview—so brief that it might have been taken as a preview of coming attractions—Dana Bash did occasionally offer a simulacrum of a real question.  But it was always in the mode of a chess player who refuses to take his hand off a piece he has moved until he gauges his opponent’s reaction. “How about I move my bishop here?” Just so: “Gee, wasn’t your position on fracking/fossil fuels/the border/welfare and Medicare for illegal immigrants/taxes, etc., etc. a tiny bit different in the dim distant past  . . . ?”

Bash never bashed the question home.  There was always plenty of wiggle room, never any serious follow-up. She did, however, allow “America’s Dad” Super Sergeant Major Walter Mitty Tim Walz to make a fool of himself.  Queried about his habit of exaggerating his military rank, postings (“Exactly where in Bagram Airfield were you stationed again, Gov?”), and combat experience, Bash let him tell the audience that he suffered, if not from PTSD, then at least bad grammar.

Bash: “You said you carried weapons in war, but you never deployed in war. Did you misspeak?”

Walz: “My grammar’s not always correct.”

At least Walz is a good source of lines for comedians.

There are two main takeaways from this pseudo-interview. One is concealed just below the surface of phrases like “flip-flop,” “walk back,” and “my opinion has evolved.” It is clear to everyone that Kamala will say anything in order to curry favor with potential voters. She was there encouraging the IRS to give extra scrutiny to tax filers who had income from tips.  But then Donald Trump began saying that he wanted to exempt income from tips from federal taxes.  I offer no opinion about the merits of the proposal, merely note that it was popular with voters. So Kamala begins aping it. Inconsistency (a nicer word than “contradiction,” “hypocrisy,” “lying”)? No, it’s that same species of cynical bluster John Kerry deployed when he told us that, regarding the Iraq war: “I was for it before I was against it.” It was for such occasions that the English essayist William Hazlitt noted that “those who lack delicacy hold us in their power.”

The chief obstacle, the bone-in-the-throat embarrassment of what Christopher Rufo has been calling Kamala’s “vaporware” campaign is to be found in the screeching disjunction between her emoticons and the adamantine, unignorable fact that the Biden-Harris administration has been, well, the Biden-Harris administration. Kamala keeps saying she wants to clear a “new way forward,” to “turn the page on Trump.”

One of her main campaign slogans is “We’re not going back.” But that bad place she wants to escape is her own creation. Maybe, just maybe, Dana Bash suggested, voters would like to go back to the Trump era when the cost of living was lower, wages were higher, and the country was at peace. She found a soft spot but she refused to push.

The cruel fact is that Kamala Harris and Joe Biden have been running the country, sort of, these last three and a half years.  They are the incumbents.  All the talk of joy and sampling of caramel-covered cakes cannot obscure that reality.  It was Kamala, in her role as President of the Senate, who cast the tie-breaking vote on many left-wing initiatives, indeed she has cast more tie-breaking votes than any vice-president in history (32, one more than John C. Calhoun).

This is an insuperable, intractable problem for the Harris campaign: she owns the situation she wants to “move forward” out of because, as vice president, she helped to create it. “Vote for me! I’ll undo everything I have done!” That dog will not hunt.

The second main takeaway from this Potemkin interview was touched upon by Vivek Ramaswamy. “Kamala’s interview last night,” he observed on X,  “was a reminder that we’re not running against a candidate. We’re running against a *system*. They require a candidate they can control, which means having original ideas is a disqualification. That’s exactly why we get Biden, then Kamala, and so on.” That rubs up against my passing reference to the fact that Biden and Harris have only “sort of” been running the country these past three and a half years. Really, deep down, it’s what Vivek calls “the system,” what I have been calling “The Committee” who is in charge.  Who’s on the governing board, the executive council? The exact composition of this globalist posse is classified, but the spiritual doorknobs of the requisite chambers should be dusted for fingerprints. Exactly who, for example, told Joe Biden he had to go, the voters be damned?  Whoever it was you can be sure that they’re on The Committee, they’re voting members of “the system.”

One way of articulating what is at stake in this election is to ask whether you want to hand the country over to this shadowy council that supplies our presidents, wages our wars, and commits us to various policies about everything from abortion and the border to taxes, free speech, and individual liberty? The alternative—it’s the only live alternative—is the MAGA agenda of Donald Trump, filled out and supplemented by JD Vance and now Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard.  More people will be joining this caravan.  Will the Strength-Through-Joy flotilla be able to prevail against this robust alternative?  Already the crumbling of the cackling cavalcade suggests that the answer is No.



X22, And we Know, and more- September 2nd

 




Stop Worrying About the Polls: Kamala’s Lead Is Fake


Yesterday, as I watched a podcast about my favorite NFL football team, a commercial interrupted my reverie.  Yes, I know.  Podcasts have commercials.  However, this was not one of those “buy this, buy that, take this to end constipation” commercials.  This was some angry man loudly complaining that Trump had failed to do X, Y, and Z.  It made me angry, but not in the way intended.  It motivated me to send a campaign contribution to Trump.  I thought the Harris campaign deserved to know that.

Joy, vibes, and cackles, everyone!  Currently, Kamala is up by 2 points in the Real Clear Politics national polling average and 3.4 points in the FiveThirtyEight average.  Some of this is polling smoke and mirrors, and some is due to Democrats coming home to support their party’s candidate.  For example, since Harris became the Democrat nominee, Robert Kennedy’s polling numbers declined from 9–10% of the vote to around 4–5%.  So, yes, the polls have tightened up.

Can Kamala win?  Only if the public buys into the massive public relations campaign touting her as a leader and the Democrats’ desperate attempt to blame Trump for the country being on the wrong track.

Keep in mind Kamala’s problems as a candidate.  She is immersed in the world of identity politics.  She has rarely been able to succeed without the help of powerful politicians.  She has never run anything significant — no city, state, or business.  She has managed her own offices but has a reputation as a terrible boss.  She avoided most of the assignments given to her by the Biden administration, especially border czar.  Finally, she is the misguided upper-middle-class daughter of a Marxist economics professor, which may account for many of her socialist views and her inability to connect with working-class folks.

Can Trump win?  Of course he can.  He has to focus on the issues and stay frosty.  No name-calling, inappropriate remarks, or wandering off-topic.

Trump has other advantages.  The main Trump-friendly issues are the economy, inflation, and illegal immigration, with 65% saying the country is on the wrong track, according to the RCP average.  He has current and former Democrats supporting him, such as Elon Musk; Tulsi Gabbard; and, most importantly, Robert F. Kennedy.  Also, the Democrats’ desire to raise the corporate tax rate and tax unrealized capital gains is motivating numerous Silicon Valley and Wall Street big-money players to back Trump.

Trump also has a secret weapon.  It is the usually ignored and virtually un-pollable mass of Trump-supporters, AKA the hidden Trump vote.  They are still there.

Now let’s take a closer look at the national results.  

Remember: the RCP average of a multi-candidate race has Kamala up by 2 points.  There are two obvious problems here.  One is that only five out of the eleven polls are surveying likely voters.  Polls of likely voters are usually more accurate than polls of registered voters.  The second is that only four of the polls were taken after RFK Jr. decided to support Trump.  It is not known how this will affect the polls in the future.

The FiveThirtyEight average says Kamala is up by 3.4 points.  How they came to that conclusion is a mystery.  If you look closely, many of the polling organizations represented here are not household names, such as Big Village, Kaplan Strategies, Angus Reid Global, etc.  There is also a mishmash of polls of all adults, registered voters, and likely voters, and many still have RFK Jr. as a separate candidate.  One poll from The Economist/YouGov, without Kennedy, has Harris up by 2 points.

The big question is whether these polls are reasonably accurate or biased.  After all, it is easy to make Kamala appear more popular than she really is.  All you have to do is sample more Democrats, more women, more minorities, or do more sampling in metropolitan areas.

According to a story in RedState, it is alleged that a recent New York Times/Siena poll was biased.  Supposedly, the poll showed significant leads for Kamala in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania that were dubious at best.  This poll claims that Harris made massive gains with senior citizens and non-college white voters that may not be valid.

Another potential problem with accuracy is that most polling organizations are left-of-center on ideological grounds.  Is it possible that they are deliberately inflating Kamala’s support to help her?  According to pollster John McLaughlin, this seems to be happening

“So what they’re doing is they’re polling fewer Republicans.  They’re polling a disproportionate number of Biden 2020 voters. ... It’s ridiculous.  So what they’re doing is they’re trying to pump Harris up.  They’re trying to suppress our vote.  And this is, you know, there’s smart people doing this, so I think it’s intentional.”

Another example is the Michigan Bloomberg/Morning Consult 5-way Poll from 7/28.  This poll shows Harris with a 12-point lead.  Sorry, but that is a Democrat fantasy.  The next closest is the New York Times poll that shows Harris with a 5-point lead, which I believe is the same biased poll discussed above.  If we remove both polls from the average, Harris’s lead shrinks from 2.3 points to only 0.4, essentially a tie.

One big issue with Kamala’s campaign is the national Democrat registration bias.  There are more Democrats than Republicans in the U.S. by 3–4%, thanks to California and New York.  If we assume that the other third-party candidates are drawing roughly 1% of the Democrat vote, Kamala should be ahead by 2–3%.  And that is what the polls say.  So if we exclude solid blue California and New York, the national race is a tie.  

For reference, the RCP average had Hillary 6 points ahead in August 2016 and Biden up by almost 7 in August 2020. 

The real killer for the Kamala poll surge may be response bias.  According to Mark Harris, with political consulting firm Coldspark, educated Democrats are 3 to 4 times more likely to answer a poll than non-college Democrats.  Also, they are way over-polling the high-turnout voters.  Trump tends to have more support from working-class Democrats and low-turnout voters.  Harris also claims they see a “historic response bias on surveys that is setting the table for a large polling miss this fall.”

National voter surveys overestimated Democrat support by 1.3% in 2016 and a whopping 3.9% in 2020.  If Mark Harris is correct, and the polling miss is close to 2020 or higher, there is a good chance Trump will win.

One more thing.  I am a big fan of actor Jeff Bridges.  However, I find the whole White Dudes for Kamala thing to be both racist and silly.  I am with Guys for Trump.  We don’t care what you look like or where your ancestors came from.




German Right Wing Party Takes Historic Win in Eastern State

 Voters in two eastern states elected their new state legislatures on Sunday.

Germany’s Alternative fur Deutschland (AfD), a right wing party, secured a historic win in a state election and is within striking distance of another victory in a neighboring state.

The Sept. 1 state-level elections in Germany’s two eastern states were to elect new state Legislatures, the Landtage, which handle local matters—similar to the role of U.S. state Legislatures.

Projections place the AfD in the lead in the east German state of Thuringia with around 33 percent of the vote, while a newly-formed leftist party also gained substantial support. Parties representing Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s centrist coalition fell behind both those factions in the state.

The Christian Democratic Union, a center-right national opposition party, also fell well behind, winning around 24 percent of the vote.

Meanwhile, the newly-formed Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW), a populist-leaning leftist party, is projected to take around 16 percent of the vote in Thuringia.

The biggest defeat in the elections seems to be related to Scholz, who has faced low approval ratings and widespread dissatisfaction with his government—particularly in Germany’s east.

According to projections, his party, the Social Democratic Party, will retain seats but barely; his centrist coalition is expected to win around 8 percent of the vote.

Other States

The AfD’s strong showing wasn’t reserved to Thuringia: projections from the neighboring eastern state of Saxony place the party at a close second.

In that race, the Christian Democratic Union appeared to be in the lead with between 31.5 and 31.8 percent of the vote.

The AfD, however, is right behind them with between 30.8 and 31.4 percent of the vote—leaving open the possibility that they may bring home a majority in both races.

The Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance, meanwhile, received 12 percent of the vote in Saxony, while Scholz’s party again faced single-digit showings.

The results mean a disappointing loss of seats for the German ruling party amid the AfD’s uptick in support in the formerly communist eastern half of the country.

As the government in Berlin faces dismal approval ratings and dwindling voter confidence, eastern Germans have been critical of mass immigration, inflation, and German support for Ukraine—a series of issues familiar to leaders across the United States and Europe.

Top candidate of the conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party Mario Voigt, Thuringia's State Premier and top candidate of the left-wing Die Linke party Bodo Ramelow (Die Linke), top candidate of the far-right AfD (Alternative for Germany) party Bjoern Hoecke and top candidate of the new left-wing populist party Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW) Katja Wolf attend a TV debate at Thuringia's State Parliament in Erfurt, eastern Germany, during the Thuringia's regional elections day on Sept. 1, 2024. JOERG CARSTENSEN/AFP via Getty Images

Europe At Crossroads

In a country whose politics have been ruled by centrists since the end of WWII, the AfD victory has shocked some Germans, particularly as the party has also made gains in races across the continent.

In June, the AfD made a strong second-place showing in European Parliament elections.

In the same race, France’s right-wing party the National Rally won about 32 percent of the vote, taking the largest vote share in the race.

A last minute grouping of centrists and leftists managed to stave off a right-wing victory in the French parliamentary elections that followed, but the outcome showed the growing strength of the right wing in Western Europe.

Right wing parties had similar victories in certain races across Europe.

The AfD’s projected victory in Thuringia, while an indication of growing support for the German right, likely won’t mean AfD control of the two states’ Legislatures: other major parties in the race have already ruled out working with the right.

Still, it’s unclear what any potential coalitions will look like. For the centrists and leftists to keep the AfD from seizing a majority in the two states, they will need to form an uncomfortable coalition.

German voters will also decide on their leaders in a federal election next year.


Dodging The Debate Would Be Smart Because Kamala Isn’t


The big debate is coming up and I think Kamala will pull out. I could be wrong, but a lot of people agree with me. And she should chicken out – she’s bound to make a fool of herself. Let’s just say that Kamala Harris is not great at public speaking. She did a 41-minute interview with Dana Bash that couldn’t have been more softball if CNN had put a Nerf on a tee in front of her and let her swing away until she hit it. They only released about 18 minutes of her babbling. Where is the rest? We can safely assume she looked like even more of an idiot in the director’s cut. She’s always incoherent. You have to translate her English into English.

Kamala will treat the debate like Tim Walz treats a deployment to a warzone – weasel out of it and then lie about it.

She’s already setting up her excuse with her demands to change the rules. Remember, Donald Trump was absolutely required to honor the debate scheduled with Joe Biden and he agreed to do so, at which point Kamala decided she wanted to change the rules. She now wants Trump’s mic unmuted, presumably so he can interrupt her and allow her to deploy that hacky canned “I’m speaking, sir” line that worked so well on supine invertebrate Mike Pence. She’s obsessing over it and is still tweeting about the stupid microphones. It’s clearly getting under her sagging skin.

Of course, Trump isn’t backing down. ABC News reluctantly had to reaffirm that the rules are the rules. Democrats hate this. Perhaps you’ve noticed that rules are not exactly the rules anymore. There are supposed to be rules for us and no rules for them. The most hilarious recent example of this was when failed pol Claire McCaskill got huffy because Donald Trump pointed out that Kamala’s enthusiastic romantic activities helped her enter politics. Trump used pretty colorful language, and McCaskill fumed, demanding to know when ministers would stand up and reject Donald Trump. But it was unclear why Donald Trump shouldn’t point out Kamala’s history of erotic entrepreneurship. She became a politician by cavorting with a powerful and married Democrat politician. This is not in dispute. McCaskill did not articulate the exact rule that she proposes to be applied, but Donald Trump has famously had his romantic relationships analyzed by the opposition. So, do they propose that Trump cannot point out something true about Kamala, but they can point out something similar about Donald Trump? The left isn’t really big on abiding by its own rules. That’s why we must do it for them.

So, what will Kamala do during this debate if she shows up? She’ll probably be literally shaking. You know she wants to have her emotional support command sergeant major (sic) there by her side. I wouldn’t mind seeing the tag-team death match between Trump/Vance and Harris/Ancient-looking Marxist Fraud Guy. I think JD Vance is going to mop the floor with Tim Walz because the blue falcon is a lying communist scumbag, and JD Vance is an awesome and intelligent vet who deployed.

But putting that aside, Kamala has got a problem. It’s a big problem. She’s not very smart. The only thing she is smart about is knowing that she’s not smart. She knows enough not to speak extemporaneously. She knows enough not to be interviewed. And I suspect she knows enough not to debate.

The regime media has a huge interest in portraying her as a genius. It’s bizarre how important it is for leftists to ensure that other people think they are smart – it’s the most insecure ideology. They’re trying to put out that image for her, and she is doing her part by not speaking and undermining their propaganda. Yet, nobody really believes it, including Kamala. Especially Kamala. That’s why she’s so scared.

So, how is she going to prepare for this debate? Trump makes it hard because Trump is not a typical debater. Trump is not a geeky forensics kid who will clearly state his premise, provide evidence, and then state his conclusion. No, Trump doesn’t think like that. You’re going to get a stream of Trumpishness. He will talk about how Kamala is the worst vice president ever and how Joe Biden is senile and how Rosie O’Donnell is very fat and how he was the best president for the working man ever and how he is also the best golfer at his club. This doesn’t make him a bad debater. It makes him an atypical one, and preparing for an atypical opponent is hard. It will be very difficult for Kamala to get ready for this, and even more difficult for her to react to him because Trump will seize the initiative up on that stage.

And that’s not even considering her handicap – that she’s a moron.

Now, people will tell you that because Kamala was a prosecutor for a short time that she’s good at this stuff. Let me tell you about most lawyers. Most lawyers are freaking terrible. They are incoherent, disorganized, and careless. This is especially true of inexperienced district attorneys like her. I grew up in a house with a competent DA who constantly complained about the incompetent ones. Many elite DAs who prosecute gang crimes, sex crimes, and murders are pretty good. Some are stunningly good. But the kind of DAs assigned to low-level misdemeanors and minor felonies, like Kamala, are not great. Many are new and inexperienced and will learn, but some are just hacks. This is true in civil law, where I practice, as well. A lot of them don’t get much time in court, and when they do they have no idea how to present an argument coherently. Just because you’re a lawyer doesn’t mean you’re good at lawyering. Remember, there’s a bell curve, and half the people live on the downslope. The fact that she was a prosecutor, which she makes no end of citing as some sort of pathetic appeal to authority, effectively means nothing. She was a bad prosecutor and she’s a bad public speaker. This is directly related to the fact that she’s stupid and has a disorganized mind. This is not a woman who got where she is because of achievement. She got there because of powerful men and perfect attendance.

And attendance is the issue. Kamala has already blown off the proposed September 4th debate and the proposed third debate, too. She’s got one debate on calendar, and I don’t think she will show up. We’ll get some excuse about how Donald Trump is a convicted felon of felonies and how it’s inappropriate for her to dignify him by standing on a stage with him and blah blah blah blah blah. The regime media will bark and clap like trained seals. 

But if the debate does go forward, I think Kamala is going to look like an idiot – particularly if Donald Trump does the smart thing, like he did with Joe Biden, and just let her run her fool mouth.



🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Toxic Homes for Sale: How California’s Illegal Marijuana Industry Ruins Houses

 Officials are finding houses riddled with residual nerve agent pesticides from China that aren’t in any U.S. chemical library.


Image

Police officers raid an illegal cannabis site in Lancaster, Calif., on Aug. 14, 2024. John Fredricks/The Epoch Times

LOS ANGELES—On a recent summer morning, a caravan of unmarked state police vehicles and white hazmat trucks crept past strip malls and wide intersections, making its way toward a pair of modest homes in a remote suburb north of Los Angeles.

A command came from the officers in the front of the black-and-white vehicles: “Seat belts off—in case we start taking fire.”

But there was no shootout. Just a tense half-hour as a phalanx of two dozen state police officers—agents from the Department of Cannabis Control (DCC)—kept snipers trained on the house, waiting for the second of two suspects to emerge.

When she finally did, petite and barefoot in a black dress, the effect was mercifully anticlimactic.

Illegal cannabis cultivation operations, or “grows,” are a multibillion-dollar-per-year industry in California, dominated by a mix of transnational criminal organizations that authorities believe are symbiotic, if adversarial.

When agents serve a warrant, they often find human trafficking victims, automatic weapons, booby traps, and, increasingly, banned toxic pesticides smuggled from China.

This particular raid, in Lancaster, netted about 1,020 plants—a modest haul compared with the herculean grows that have become common across California’s booming black market.

But such mild suburban tableaus belie a sleeping, sinister threat.

“What we have right now is organized criminal enterprises literally destroying the city building by building as they modify them for illegal cultivation,” Mike Katz, a Lancaster code enforcement officer who heads the city’s cannabis unit, told The Epoch Times.

“They’re endangering the families who will occupy those buildings in the future. They are lowering the value of neighboring properties and dragging the whole community down.”

‘Super Toxic’

Buildings contaminated by illegal grows are dangerous because the harsh pesticides that growers use permeate every surface—ceilings, walls, floors, vents, and drywall.

Toxic black mold blooms in the 75 percent humidity needed to grow marijuana. The massive amounts of water and electricity required to sustain an operation can result in structural damage to vents and sunken floors, overloaded transformers, and corroded wiring just itching for a fire.

Katz, whom the city’s chief of police refers to as the department’s “Swiss Army knife,” has been a firefighter, reserve police officer, and now, an unarmed code enforcement official. He approaches the job with a certain zeal, devouring scientific studies and how-to books on cultivation and generally making it his mission to stop grow houses from slipping through the cracks.

Owners can often get away with making cosmetic fixes—“candy coating,” as one inspector put it—if local governments don’t intervene before they start concealing the damage.

Police officers arrest people while raiding an illegal cannabis site in Lancaster, Calif., on Aug. 14, 2024. John Fredricks/The Epoch Times
Working and middle-class families migrate to bedroom communities such as Lancaster, where you can still find a single-family home with a backyard for about $500,000—about half the median price in Los Angeles, according to Redfin. You may find one for even less if a grower has been busted and is offloading at a discount.

The injustice of it rankles Katz. He said he imagines families struggling to buy a home, and their toddlers probing surfaces tainted with insecticides—potent carcinogens, endocrine disruptors, nerve agents, and others no one even knows how to identify.

“They are super toxic, but very effective,” he said. “One we just learned of last week has a 14-year half-life. We did a search warrant back in January and didn’t get test results until this week. I’m having to tell all the detectives and everyone involved that we were exposed to these chemicals.”

Low-cost housing also attracts sophisticated criminal enterprises looking for ways to launder money and turn a profit. Often, illegal growers can do that after just one harvest. Typically, an operation can turn four to six harvests per year.

Wholesale value for the plants seized in the modest raid we accompanied—they were days away from a second harvest—is more than $540,000.

To avoid detection and stay a step ahead of authorities, growers are continually adapting.

“There are probably a lot more growing indoors that we don’t know about,” Jennifer Morris, a code enforcement officer with Riverside County and former head of its cannabis unit, told The Epoch Times. “But they’re pretty good at keeping themselves looking very nondescript.”

From the outside, the houses look normal, and it usually takes a fire, robbery, or neighbors reporting electrical theft to tip off law or code enforcement, according to Morris. Growers also build walls to conceal grow rooms, and they sometimes install a resident worker or own a dog to give the appearance of normality.

Because the entire industry is clandestine, no one can accurately estimate the extent of the problem. Many communities might not even be aware it’s happening.

“I’ve talked to cities where they say, ‘We don’t have a problem,’” said David Welch, an attorney who contracts as a special counsel with cities in Los Angeles County that want “a more aggressive” approach to narcotics enforcement. “Then law enforcement will hit a grow in that city.”


Police officers wear protective gear while raiding an illegal cannabis site in Lancaster. John Fredricks/The Epoch Times

Where there is one, there are likely more. But perpetrators are opportunistic, itinerant.

“We have seen the same owners of properties in different counties that have had illegal cultivation on them,” Morris said.

Wilson Linares, who leads the Department of Cannabis Control’s Los Angeles County law enforcement unit, said it’s hard to pinpoint which players are tied to which territories.

“They’re just everywhere,“ he said. ”It doesn’t really stay in that area; they just go wherever they can master operations.”

Growers, he said, “do a good job of layering their operation.”

“I don’t think they even know they’re working for the same organization sometimes,” Linares said.

That makes it difficult to go after the few bigger fish, to which, some insiders say, all these operations are ultimately “funneling up.”

Those caught at the grows are inevitably low-level employees, if not forced labor, and are typically interviewed and released. Illegal cultivation—anything more than six plants per person, whether it’s 10 or 10,000—is a misdemeanor in California.

“Sometimes our investigations do a good job at digging to make sure we’re eradicating the problem,” Linares said. “But sometimes they cut losses and move on and go somewhere else. We have to follow and chase them. It takes a lot of effort and time to conduct these investigations.”

Like meth houses of decades past, there are residential grows too damaged to flip.

But it’s the moderate ones, the ones that are at risk of selling at a discount to families, that Katz said keep him up at night.

While they can’t prevent the sale, or in many cases, habitation, building inspectors and code enforcement officers use “red tagging” and other methods to compel compliance—such as creating liens to cloud the title or disconnecting utilities. And in some cases, those costs and headaches transfer to new owners.

California law gives local government broad authority to abate “public nuisances”—which include dangerous and contaminated buildings, according to Katz. But enforcing compliance can often depend on a municipality’s ability to pay for things such as civil lawsuits.

If public safety officials don’t discover a grow before property owners start hiding the damage, it’s often too late.

“There is no roadmap,” Katz said. “These sociopaths are buying and selling these houses.”

‘I Didn’t Know Anything’

There were signs: two dozen large bags of what Virginia Aceres thought was ordinary grass fertilizer and canisters of chemicals bearing designs of spiders and worms that the previous owner left behind. He offered to pay her $500 to get rid of them.

In two months, she received a $10,000 electricity bill.

Aceres said she moved from Los Angeles to the Antelope Valley because she didn’t want her kids hanging out with people who use drugs. She nabbed a five-bedroom house for $535,000, $15,000 below asking.

“It’s super big—we thought, ‘Oh wow, this is perfect.’”

But she found out after moving in that it had been used by the previous owners to grow weed.

“Every afternoon, the upstairs smells of marijuana, and it gives me a raging headache,” Aceres told The Epoch Times.

When a city inspector came by and pointed out a meter wired to steal electricity and stains on the bathroom ceilings from burned chemicals, she said, “Now I understand.”

The five bedrooms were originally three, she discovered; the previous owner had added two, and it was up to her to register the additions with the city.

When property owners obtain permits to modify buildings but don’t follow up to call for a final inspection of the work, this can tip off code enforcement and form part of the basis for a warrant. So too can electrical fires or electricity theft.

But Aceres said she bought her house without any compliance obligations that would arise from pre-sale code enforcement; inspectors came after she moved in and pointed out the damage.

The circuit breakers at her house are constantly blowing, especially if electronics are running at the same time, and electricians tell her she has to completely redo the wiring.

“My daughter relies on a machine to help her breathe,” Aceres said, referring to a nebulizer that delivers oxygen and liquid steroids. “We had to buy a generator. She’s 9; she can’t ride a bike, can’t walk more than 20 minutes, can’t run. At night she has panic attacks, she comes to my door in pain, she can’t breathe, so I connect the machine and give her medicine.”

A neighbor warned her that the previous owner had installed multiple massive air conditioners and that there were fires. People cruise by the house. Someone showed up looking to collect on a debt. The IRS, the police, and city inspectors have all visited.

“For all this, I’d like to move—because they’re going to confuse us, and they’re going to think that we sell drugs or have something to do with all that. But we haven’t been able to sell the house because of all these problems,” she said. “If a buyer asks questions, we’re obligated to tell them the truth.”

Banned Pesticides
Labor and sex trafficking, animal abuse, gun violence, and rampant environmental crimes have long been associated with illegal marijuana cultivation.
The prevalence of indoor grows and collateral effects on residential buildings are not new or limited to California. In 2017, Denver police estimated that one in 10 homes were being used to cultivate, leaving the city with a dangerous mold problem.

But the influx of banned toxic insecticides in California’s illicit operations is relatively novel, according to those on the front lines.

“About a year ago, we started seeing these banned pesticides—they’ve made their way into most of the cultivation sites,” said Jeremiah LaRue, sheriff of Siskiyou County.

LaRue oversees a mountainous swath of Northwest California bordering Oregon, notorious for flourishing outdoor grows. Last year, the DCC confiscated more marijuana in Siskiyou than any other county aside from Alameda.

While operations have moved from federal lands to private property in recent years, LaRue said these days it’s a mix of outdoor grows, “hoop houses,” and some converted residential homes.

Linares said he noticed an uptick in pesticides as some producers transitioned from outdoor to indoor.

“They’re easier to operate in that they can control the environment a lot better. So that’s why at least in the Los Angeles County area you see quite a few indoor grows,” he said, pointing to the Antelope Valley as a primary SoCal hotspot, along with the San Fernando Valley and Frazier Park in Kern County.

It may seem counterintuitive that indoor operations are increasingly relying on contraband pesticides, but the lack of natural predators inside means spider mites, aphids, mildew, and black rot or fungus can easily take hold, according to Josh Wurzer, CEO and co-founder of SC Labs, a cannabis testing and research lab based in Santa Cruz, California, with outlets in Colorado, Arizona, Oregon, and Michigan.

“Once you get a single fungus spore or any tiny spider mite into a grow and it starts to proliferate, they take root and it takes off,“ he said. ”There are no birds to eat them or natural controls to keep pests in check like there are outdoors.”

Morris said she has observed a lot of indoor grows using fumigated miticides.

“They tend to have a problem with spider mites, and I think some of the problem is someone tending several house grows, they get mites on them and take them to the next location,” she said.

In the regulated market, growers have adopted organic solutions—such as neem oil, predatory insects, and sterile environments, Wurzer said. But on the black market, where there is no testing and no regulation, the point is to make money as fast as possible.

“If no one is checking, if consumers won’t know the difference, people will do what is easiest,” Wurzer said. “And the easiest solution is to spray all kinds of pesticides so there are no problems with pests and you get the highest yield and make as much money as possible.”

The California Department of Pesticide Regulation publishes a pocket guide for law and code enforcement officers, listing more than two dozen insecticides, fungicides, miticides, rodenticides, and plant growth regulators to look out for in mitigation operations. Several are banned in the United States.

Increasingly, officers say, they are finding chemicals they aren’t familiar with or can’t identify.

‘No One Is Going to Find It’

At recent raids, Katz’s team found endrine, a highly toxic pesticide with neurological, developmental, and reproductive effects that was discontinued in the United States in 1986 and has been shown to persist in soil for 14 years or more. They also found endosulfan sulfate, a similarly toxic pesticide known to be an endocrine disruptor, that was phased out in the United States by 2010 and globally banned under the 2011 Stockholm Convention.

“All kinds of chemicals are being found. The ones from China, they’re not even in any chemical library,” Katz said, noting that they’re having to send samples to an “extremely expensive” lab in Sacramento.

“The EPA got involved. We’ve found all kinds of nerve agent pesticides, and they’re not listed in any of these libraries for the machines that read this stuff.”

When it comes to testing for pesticides on the regulated market, Wurzer said a proper lab can find any chemical eventually—if they’re looking for it and they know it exists.

“But we’re not as good at finding things we’re not looking for,“ Wurzer said. ”If someone develops a new pesticide, until people realize it’s being used, no one is going to be looking for it, so no one is going to find it.”

That problem extends to products consumers buy in state-regulated dispensaries. While Wurzer said that less than 3 percent of regulated cannabis samples his lab tests contain pesticides, growers are getting “really creative,” using compounds they know won’t show up in panels in order to circumvent regulation.

“A lot of these line up with what we find in illegal grows—pesticides with Chinese origin,” he said.

Wurzer said that after a recent investigation found “alarming” levels of toxic pesticides in regulated products, he’s begun offering an expanded testing panel that includes some of these known black-market pesticides. But there are plenty of disreputable labs, he said, that will produce results their clients want to see.

On illegal grow sites, some pesticides look like wood chips, burned in halved soda cans as a fumigant; others come in bottles that are mixed and repurposed, leaving public safety teams to guess.

“They started bringing them into indoor grows, and it’s really hard for us to identify all the banned pesticides because they start taking labels off, they start mixing the canned products with other items, and it’s really hard to pinpoint exactly which items are from where, or if we’re finding the same items somewhere else,” Linares said.

The fact that these compounds are inhaled—either by unsuspecting consumers who think they’re smoking regulated cannabis or by unsuspecting residents who move into a former grow house—exacerbates the harm.

As Wurzer said, when the plant is inhaled rather than eaten, it goes directly into the lungs, bypassing many of the body’s natural defense mechanisms, such as the digestive system and the liver, which filter toxins.

“Any pesticide deemed harmful on a food crop in the U.S. would be extra harmful when it’s inhaled,” Wurzer said.

“I can only imagine anyone who moves into these houses where they’ve been spraying indoors for years and years—certainly there would be off-gassing of these pesticides, and the people living there would be breathing them in.”

And they don’t disappear when you stop using them. Wurzer recalled when growers using pesticides to cultivate medical marijuana at indoor facilities tried to transition after legalization but kept failing tests even though they’d phased out the chemicals.

“This was a huge issue. ... These pesticides permeate every surface and are leeching out of the walls and ceilings,” he said. “The drywall absorbed them, the paint had absorbed them. The grow lights and the heat—now they were continuing to off-gas. The contaminated plants would fail pesticide tests a year later.”

At high enough levels, those agents can be just as toxic to humans as they are to bugs, Wurzer said, recalling the history of companies such as Monsanto and Bayer, which repurposed compounds originally developed for chemical warfare during World War II for the agricultural market.

Similar to the challenge of regulating performance-enhancing drugs in sports, pesticide producers can create new compounds that will evade existing test panels, he said.

“It’s a cat-and-mouse game we’re always playing,” Wurzer said

‘It’s Just Pot’

California is home to one of the largest legal cannabis markets in the world. But since legalization, the state’s black market has only grown, dwarfing and infecting its regulated sales.

“The bargain that was given to voters was—we’ll give out licenses, collect taxes to fund government services, and smash the illegal market and the criminal organizations would go away,” Katz said. “That’s not happening. And these collateral issues are something they hadn’t even thought about.”

Recent raids have netted tens of thousands of plants and millions of dollars of product from subterranean operations the size of football fields. The state, touting ramped-up enforcement, has seized more than $120 million worth of illegal cannabis so far this year.
In early August, the DCC reported that the state’s Unified Cannabis Enforcement Task Force had served 309 warrants since its inception in 2022, and the agency reported serving 386 search warrants since it was formed in 2021, in operations that overlap with the task force’s. A representative for DCC said its enforcement division has served 250 warrants related to indoor grows since forming in 2021.

But some say soft laws, a patchwork approach, and regulatory blind spots—as well as a lack of interest from federal authorities and local prosecutors—are allowing the black market to wreak havoc.

Tom Lackey, a California Assemblymember whose district includes the Antelope Valley, said he thinks the dangers are underestimated, in part because of a prevailing misconception that “it’s just pot.”

He pointed to the fact that black market marijuana accounts for some 80 percent of total sales in California, and licensed growers pressured by high taxes and the cost of compliance are taking shortcuts to survive. Various industry analyses over the past several years have estimated that between half and two-thirds of California sales are from illegal sources. According to a 2023 report by New Frontier Data, an estimated $77 billion—or 72 percent of all U.S. sales in 2022—were from illicit sources.

“We’ve overdone it. It’s well-intentioned, but we’ve done very little to go after these illicit players,“ Lackey said. ”The majority of our focus is directed toward those trying to comply, which is ironic.”

When the state does go after illicit players, it’s costly and time-consuming, and labor-intensive intelligence gathering and warrants can lead to dead ends.

During the recent Lancaster raid, the city’s new assistant chief of police, Chris Roberts, gestured at the two dozen highly trained agents in tactical gear and said: “There’s a lot that goes into this. This isn’t cheap.”

Since voters passed Proposition 64 in 2016, illegal cultivation is a misdemeanor. Violating the six-plant-per-person limit carries the same penalty regardless of how many plants you have. And while the law is written to include jail time for certain cultivation, possession, and other crimes, most communities have neither the appetite nor the space to incarcerate people for marijuana offenses.

“The court system would not, in my opinion, be locking someone up for six months,” LaRue said, referring to the penalty for cultivating more than six plants.


“The jails are so impacted in most communities, there is just no space for people committing misdemeanors. To be housed in jail for any substantive time, it needs to be serious or violent. And marijuana possession, even if it’s thousands of plants, is still a minor crime. It would never happen because it’s not viewed as serious enough.”

Some municipalities appear to be more aggressive. The Kern County sheriff’s recent raid of a massive underground grow seized 17,650 plants and resulted in the arrest of three Chinese nationals. In some cases, a state agency such as Fish and Wildlife will serve a warrant that leads to felony environmental crimes.

But that’s less likely to happen in the residential raids that tend to result in misdemeanor referrals to the district attorney, those familiar with the issue say.

“If they’re not going to charge you for dealing drugs, why would they charge you for environmental crimes? Typically drugs are a higher priority,” Welch said.

He estimated that L.A. County’s illegal marijuana trade is “90 percent unenforced—and that might actually be somewhat forgiving.”

Previously, he told The Epoch Times that also applies even when there are narcotics or guns involved at the locations.

“I’ve seen enough of these cases to know they’re not being filed,” he said.

An inquiry to the L.A. County District Attorney’s Office requesting total referrals for cannabis-related crimes, filings, and rejections was not returned.

Linares said it’s far more common for offenders to get fined or receive informal probation.

“I have not seen any jail sentences for the misdemeanors,” Linares said.

Lackey suggested that the relaxed penalties are, in part, because of a misconception—a “’70s marijuana attitude”—about what the illicit industry really is.

“Everybody thinks people in this business look like Zig-Zag,” he said. “No—these are white-collar, brilliant people making billions and billions of dollars. Our system is not taking them seriously.”

The environmental destruction and effects of pesticides are very toxic—everyone knows this, according to Lackey.

“Some of these illicit grows, law enforcement finds deceased animals all over the place,“ he said. ”The residential impact, molds, cancer, fertility issues—all sorts of human threats. But they turn a blind eye because it’s weed.”

While fentanyl deserves to be “front and center,” according to Lackey, “we can walk and chew gum at the same time.”

Chinese Dominance

At scale, the two problems are inextricably linked.

The uneasy mix of crime syndicates running illicit marijuana in California, according to law enforcement officials, includes Chinese and Hmong groups, Mexican cartels and Latin American street gangs, and Chaldean and Armenian organizations.

While Linares says these groups are not all working together, they maintain a kind of territorial detente.

But according to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Mexican cartels and Chinese groups continue to dominate the state’s black market. In recent years, federal investigations have unearthed how Chinese crime networks have risen to global prominence, in part by laundering cartel drug money.

Ray Donovan, the DEA’s former chief of operations, has described how networks supplying fentanyl precursor chemicals to Mexican cartels were also laundering fentanyl money and reinvesting it in illicit marijuana. Testifying before the House’s Select Committee on the CCP in April, he outlined how these groups operate with at least tacit support from the Chinese communist regime.
At a Senate drug caucus hearing later that month, William Kimbell, current chief of operations for the DEA, said his agency has found that Chinese organizations have “taken over” marijuana cultivation in 23 states, some of which are “legitimate” but still staffed by people controlled by Chinese money laundering organizations.
A 2024 DEA report noted that the recent uptick in the number of illicit grows linked to Chinese and other Asian organized crime groups, with “Asian investors” emerging as a new funding source of illegal marijuana production in the United States.

“Asian drug trafficking organizations have been involved in illegal marijuana cultivation for decades, operating industrial-scale indoor marijuana grows in residential homes, primarily in the western United States,” the report reads.

The federal government has kept its eye on California’s Central Valley, which stretches from the Sacramento Valley to the Tulare Basin; in 2017, more than 58 percent of the 3.4 million marijuana plants the DEA eradicated in the United States were located in this region.

In 2018, an operation involving hundreds of federal and local agents raided 75 houses in the Sacramento area used for cultivation by Chinese drug traffickers, and it filed civil forfeiture against more than 100 houses, making it one of the largest residential forfeitures in U.S. history.

In its announcement, the Justice Department stated that patterns had begun to emerge during years-long investigations of indoor grows in residential neighborhoods—including financing and distribution methods.

In 2019, a grand jury indicted six Chinese nationals on money laundering counts alleging that they used funds from China to buy grow houses in Sacramento and Placer counties.
image-5713886
A paramilitary policeman stands on guard on Tiananmen Square in Beijing on March 15, 2019. Drug networks tied to Mexican cartels are supported by the Chinese regime. Fred Dufour/AFP via Getty Images

‘It’s All Connected’

“The fentanyl, the money laundering, the marijuana grows—it’s all connected,” Leland Lazarus, associate director of national security at Florida International University’s Jack D. Gordon Institute for Public Policy, told The Epoch Times in an email.

These syndicates usually employ illegal Chinese migrants, who are often subjected to forced labor or criminality, terrible working conditions, and even sexual violence, according to Lazarus.

LaRue pointed to an instantly recognizable structure—as if growers had been given a manual—at Chinese-led grows, which dominate Siskiyou County.

“They’re almost cookie-cutter; they all look the same. Even the houses are the same. It’s almost a prescribed thing: This is what you’re going to use, this is what you’re going to have,” the sheriff said. “You can almost go on a site and say, ‘This is Chinese.’”

Lazarus noted that U.S. law enforcement agencies have been tracking “the vast Chinese money laundering networks” across 22 states for years, but the problem remains “a lack of significant resources, language skills, and cultural knowledge to truly dismantle these networks.”

LaRue conducted a recent raid in which his team encountered 28 people onsite—all of them elderly women.

“We couldn’t talk to any of them. One that spoke English, she was not about to let anyone open their mouth. That bothers me,” he said. “What is really going on there?”

The women were released from custody while LaRue’s office continued its investigation.

Some of Lazarus’s recent research has focused on the vast reach of these organizations, far beyond California grow houses or even the East Coast, where federal authorities say they are anchored.

“Like other transnational criminal organizations, Chinese illegal gangs operate around the globe. You’re seeing some of the same illicit activities in Southeast Asia, Europe, and even Latin America,” he said.

“And it’s hard to imagine that China—which is the largest surveillance state in the world—isn’t aware of these activities. That’s why we need a truly international effort to deal with the scourge of global Chinese organized crime.”

Path Forward

In a 2013 memorandum, then-Deputy Attorney General James M. Cole outlined priorities for federal prosecutors in pursuing marijuana-related crimes, in large part deferring to state authority and taking a hands-off approach in jurisdictions that had legalized the drug.
image-5713843
U.S. Border Patrol agents stack more than 400 pounds of marijuana seized from drug smugglers after it was brought across the Rio Grande from Mexico into the United States, near Laredo, Texas, on Aug. 7, 2008. John Moore/Getty Images

Such guidance relied on an expectation that those jurisdictions “will implement strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems that will address the threat those state laws could pose to public safety, public health, and other law enforcement interests,” Cole said.

According to many working to contain the collateral fallout of California’s illegal marijuana trade, that has not happened.

“The feds are hands-off on anything involving cannabis,” Katz said, while also pointing to a lack of appetite among local prosecutors. “My guess would be they’re a little gun-shy about jury nullification. ... A jury will be like: ‘Who cares? It’s just cannabis.’”

Lackey said he is hopeful that a DEA proposal to reclassify marijuana from a Schedule I drug to a Schedule III drug will loosen restrictions that, for example, prevent the legal market from using banks.

California needs to take the lead in stronger prosecution efforts and be able to mete out consequences, he said.

“The reason we’re struggling in California is we’ve relaxed consequences, and of course that’s going to increase evasion and it’s going to create victims,” Lackey said. “It really has been a hurtful experience for me to have a front-row seat to watch this mistake being made.”

According to Katz and Morris, the key to navigating the no-man’s land between the state and the feds, between lax prosecution and the absence of a standardized mandate, remains collaboration.

Morris pointed to Riverside’s creation of a roundtable bringing together 43 jurisdictions each quarter to discuss what agents are seeing on the ground.

“We found there were a lot of the same players, especially in our sister counties like San Bernardino. ... There’s a lot of money in this, so they change tactics,” she said.

Learning how growers in Kern County were burying shipping containers to house grows, for example, helped Riverside stay ahead of the game, according to Morris.

Katz said his department immerses itself in the issue, cross-training with other disciplines and attending Environmental Protection Agency trainings and medical conferences. In the absence of leadership, or a standard approach, they cobble it together.

“A lot of cities are not investing that kind of effort into combating this problem, so they don’t even know what they don’t know,” he said.

Ultimately, according to Katz, the battle has nothing to do with the morality of cannabis—“that’s not the war we’re waging”—and everything to do with preventing a multibillion-dollar criminal industry from harming and killing residents.

“They don’t care if the pesticides they apply in the house poisons a family,“ he said. ”They don’t care about the people who consume their contaminated cannabis. Money is all that matters to them.

“Only a sociopath would allow other human beings into buildings that might kill them. That’s what we’re combating.”