Thursday, July 4, 2024

The Communist Plan That Has Subverted Our Intel Agencies


On June 21, the FBI declassified a 1999 video of Saudi intelligence agent Omar al-Bayoumi casing the Capitol and other Washington D.C. sites for the 9/11 attack.  How, then, did the CIA-FBI 9/11 report conclude in 2005 that Saudi Arabia was not involved in the attack?  And why did the FBI maintain — for 20 years, before its recent retraction — that al-Bayoumi wasn’t a Saudi agent?

Such willful deception, practiced increasingly by American intelligence, is the subject of former CIA agent J. Michael Waller’s new book Big Intel: How the CIA and FBI Went from Cold War Heroes to Deep State Villains.  The dramatic writing and detailing, backed by the author’s experience in espionage — in Central America and the U.S.S.R., and against jihadist conspiracies — make it a page-turner.  In 37 chapters, plus additional sections and a reading list, it presents an alarming history of how a century-old Marxist campaign has succeeded in ideologically subverting America and its intel agencies.

The results of that success are seen in today’s leftist street protests, the DEI obsession, and prevalent anti-Israel sentiment; also, in the saturation of academia and bureaucracy by Marxists.  Not so evident, because intel agencies operate covertly, is their transmogrification from valiant fighters for American freedom to an emerging state police harrying those who oppose the acceptable narratives du jour.

Big Intel traces the long process of this toxic alchemy.  Waller, now an analyst at the Center for Security Policy, borrows his colleague Diana West’s metaphor of a “red thread” leading back to a Bolshevik strategy to destroy the West by capturing the minds of its elites, artists, academicians, and students.  It was to unfold over several generations.  The planning happened at a 1922 meeting in Moscow, headed by Feliks Dzerzhinsky, then commissar of KGB-precursor Cheka.  So, attempts to infiltrate our intel apparatus should have been foreseen but were tragically missed.  (Waller praises the one man — J. Edgar Hoover — who did not miss the signs, though he was “imperfect” and “his errors compounded over the decades.”)

Present at the meeting, held at the Marx-Engels Institute, were Cominternpresidium member Karl Radek, the Prussian Willi Münzenberg, and the Hungarian philosopher Gyorgy Lukacs.  They decided to use Comintern fronts and intellectual networks in Europe and across the world to reach the elite; at the same time, they would create “foreign subsidiary institutions, under prestigious academic cover, as a sophisticated social base to attract leaders of the arts, culture, and academia.”  Lukacs believed in the “abolition of culture,” which Waller interprets as the “wholesale destruction of history, belief, and values, right down to the tearing apart of family life and the sexualization of small children to dehumanize the next generation.”

Thus, the seeds were sown for the Frankfurt School (founded 1923), the nursery of Critical Theory and cultural Marxism, which echoes Lukacs’s destructive theme. Eros and Civilization, a book by Herbert Marcuse, one of the school’s philosophers, sparked the erosion of sexual boundaries that ultimately brought us the absurdities of gender-identity fluidity.

With the rise of Naziism, members of the Frankfurt School took refuge in America, where Leon Trotsky, during his brief stay (1916–17), had prepared the seedbed by running an influence operation to spread civilization-destroying Marxist ideas. From 1933 to 1949, the school was based at Columbia University. It was from here that the teardown of Western ideals was launched, and it was here that the Marxist takeover of academia began.

The simultaneous infiltration of our intel agencies was aided by the exigent recruitment of communists by the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), a World War II agency for coordinating espionage, which later grew into the CIA.  America was then hard-pressed to gather intelligence from Europe and behind enemy lines. Besides field operatives from communist networks, scholars like Marcuse were enlisted for their language prowess and grasp of European politics.  By the war’s end, they had penetrated the OSS, academia, journalism, entertainment, politics, federal and state bureaucracies, courts, and even Congress.  Besides wielding immense influence, they could steal secrets.

Only Hoover — who headed the FBI from 1924 to his death in 1972 — stood as a bulwark against them, establishing a Counterintelligence Program (COINTELPRO) in 1956 to watch, infiltrate, and disrupt their operations. However, the program, found to have violated constitutional rights, was shut down in 1971.  From then on, the FBI deteriorated and was weaponized against ordinary citizens and elected representatives.  It now stoops to domestic political spying and abridgment of First Amendment rights.

According to Waller, two “cultural revolutions” took place in the intel agencies after 9/11.  The first, born of necessity under President George W. Bush, started by watching and listening to the public.  The 9/11 attack was seen as the result of intelligence failure, justifying more aggressive intelligence gathering. The Patriot Act, the expanded Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), and the new Transportation Security Administration (TSA) made this possible.  Financial transactions came under greater scrutiny to detect terrorist funding.  Intel coordination was centralized under the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), Big Tech was drawn in to help, and the FBI was doubled and armed to paramilitary proportions.

Strangely, while Americans were subject to increasing scrutiny and inconvenience, Bush took pains to choose an anodyne name — Global War on Terror — for the fight against the jihadists and to insist that Islam was “good and peaceful” and that Arabs and Muslims should not be harassed.

All this paved the way for the second revolution under President Barack Obama.  But he hailed from the ‘New Left,’ which believed in the power of change through community organizing, indoctrination of the next generation, and working within the system, not in the guerrilla tactics favored by earlier radicals.  A Critical Theory-based philosophy and “anti-imperialist” salience were adopted, new directives focused on “domestic violent extremism” (anything anti-left), and the pursuit of jihadists was halted.

The long march through the institutions began with the appointment of “soft-on-Russia” James Clapper as ODNI chief, the communist-voting John Brennan as CIA director, and communist and social justice warrior James Comey as FBI director.  Clapper and Comey consolidated DEI by setting diversity goals for the FBI, purging study material on radical Islam, and requiring two diversity trainings annually for employees.  Critical Theory became “mission critical” as the ODNI pressured all agencies, the military, and contractors to toe the line.  The entire federal workforce became an instrument of social change.  Dissent and political opposition were targeted.

For example, the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane, a dirty-tricks campaign to thwart President Trump’s election and later cripple his administration, tried to discredit him using fake documents (the Steele dossier) suggesting he was in collusion with Russia.  Similarly, the FBI, CIA, and ODNI worked with social media companies to lie that the Hunter Biden laptop, which would have prevented Biden’s victory, was Russian disinformation. All the while, the real threats of Islamic extremism, the Muslim Brotherhood network, Antifa, and BLM were ignored.  At one BLM protest, FBI agents knelt and clapped for the activists.

Under Biden, what Obama started continues with redoubled vigor.  A false narrative about a “January 6 insurrection” discredits Trump and targets his supporters as domestic terrorists.  Parents speaking up against pornographic material and drag queen hour in schools are sued or harassed by the FBI.  In short, our intel agencies have been psychologically manipulated into becoming catalysts of a cultural change that rots America from within.

Big Intel is a dire warning.  Waller says this Marxist subversion of intel might be worse than the damage wrought by the most destructive spy discovered in the FBI — Robert Hanssen, who died in prison last year.  He ends the last chapter calling for a national discussion on the FBI.  The remedy he suggests for the FBI might well apply to the CIA: “Take it apart, parcel out the useful functions, and close down the rest.”



On the Fringe, Red Pill News, and more- July 4th

 






Remember What Independence Day Is About


It was 248 years ago today that the world found out that the Continental Congress in Philadelphia was really up. Rather than trying to reconcile with England, they decided to break, completely. More than that, these 56 men from all 13 colonies decided to lay out for all the world, and history, to see why it was they chose this path. The idea had been decided earlier, the language labored over, and the printer finally got the finished product to make copies so the colonists could be told what their leaders ultimately decided. It was the debut of the Declaration of Independence.

We revere this document today, but that the time there was nothing close to a guarantee that it would be remembered as anything other than a blip in history; a warning about the dangers of lofty goals in the face of tyranny. 

If we had lost, the signatories would have been hunted down and executed. It’s very likely no copies of the document would have survived – why would King George allow it? Royalty back when royalty ruled were not known for their interest in maintaining a strict record for posterity, even of their enemies and shortcomings, as seen by their subjects. It was much easier to simply wipe it clean and pretend it never happened, except in legend as a cautionary tale should anyone else get a “bug up their butts” about freedom, liberty or independence. 

Keeping copies around could inspire others. This wasn’t the digital age, making copies wasn’t easy or cheap. Things could be wiped from existence.

But the Declaration of Independence was not wiped from existence because we did not lose. As we now face a greater threat to our liberty from within than without, it’s worth rereading that beautiful document on this day, and as the two-and-a-half century anniversary fast approaches, to inspire people to ensure that anniversary of this spirit endures not only 2 more years, but forever. Here is the text and the reason for the celebration of this day.

In Congress, July 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen United States of America. 

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

It was signed by these men: Delaware: George Read, Caesar Rodney, Thomas McKean. Pennsylvania: George Clymer, Benjamin Franklin, Robert Morris, John Morton, Benjamin Rush, George Ross, James Smith, James Wilson, George Taylor. Massachusetts: John Adams, Samuel Adams, John Hancock, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry. New Hampshire: Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton. Rhode Island: Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery. New York: Lewis Morris, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, William Floyd. Georgia: Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton. Virginia: Richard Henry Lee, Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Jefferson, George Wythe, Thomas Nelson, Jr. North Carolina: William Hooper, John Penn, Joseph Hewes. South Carolina: Edward Rutledge, Arthur Middleton, Thomas Lynch, Jr., Thomas Heyward, Jr. New Jersey: Abraham Clark, John Hart, Francis Hopkinson, Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon. Connecticut: Samuel Huntington, Roger Sherman, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott. Maryland: Charles Carroll, Samuel Chase, Thomas Stone, William Paca.

God bless them, and God bless the United State of America. Happy Independence Day.



🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


This Week In Lawfare Land: SCOTUS Sends ‘Get Trump’ Prosecutions Into A Tailspin

Here’s the latest information you need to know about each prosecution Democrats are waging against the Republican presidential candidate.



On Monday, the Supreme Court issued a major decision in Trump v. United States that sent shockwaves throughout the political and legal world. The Supreme Court’s decision held that a president is entitled “to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution” for “actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority” and “at least presumptive immunity” for “official acts.” This holding could entitle President Trump to immunity from criminal prosecution and upend the lawfare crusade against President Trump in New York, Georgia, Florida, and Washington D.C.

The Supreme Court’s decision has already prompted Judge Merchan to delay President Trump’s sentencing hearing to Sept. 18 in Manhattan, meaning Trump will no longer be forced to deal with the absurd timeline of a sentencing just days prior to the Republican National Convention. President Trump’s legal team is now seeking to vacate the conviction based on presidential immunity. 

Here’s the latest information you need to know about each case.

Read our previous installments here.

Manhattan, New York: Prosecution by DA Alvin Bragg for NDA Payment

How we got here: Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg — who “campaigned as the best candidate to go after the former president” — charged former President Donald Trump with 34 felony charges for alleged falsification of business records relating to a nondisclosure agreement paid by Trump’s former attorney Michael Cohen to pornographic film actress Stormy Daniels.

This criminal trial concluded on May 30, with the jury returning a guilty verdict that Trump is expected to appeal. The conviction does not affect President Trump’s ability to run for president, though it may present complications with his ability to run a modern presidential campaign.

Latest developments: Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. United States on Monday, Judge Merchan postponed President Trump’s sentencing hearing to Sept. 18 “if such is still necessary.” In Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court determined that a president is entitled to “at least presumptive immunity” for “official acts.” Following the Supreme Court’s ruling, President Trump’s legal team filed a motion seeking to overturn the Manhattan conviction based on presidential immunity, arguing that the jury saw evidence that was otherwise protected by at least the presumption of presidential immunity. 

Fulton County, Georgia: Prosecution by DA Fani Willis for Questioning Election Results

How we got here: The Georgia state criminal case is helmed by District Attorney Fani Willis, who charged Trump with 13 felony counts, including racketeering charges, related to his alleged attempt to challenge the 2020 election results in Georgia. This case is currently stalled while the Georgia Court of Appeals hears an appeal on whether Willis should be disqualified from the case. The hearing is scheduled for Oct. 5, 2024.

Latest developments: This case remains largely on hold, although the recent Supreme Court decision in Trump v. United States may have implications for these criminal proceedings. Specifically, if President Trump’s actions in Georgia constituted “official acts,” or even the “outer perimeter” of official acts, then the Georgia courts could find President Trump is entitled to immunity from criminal prosecution in this case. 

Southern District of Florida: Prosecution by Biden DOJ for Handling of Classified Documents

How we got here: In this federal criminal case, special counsel Jack Smith and federal prosecutors with Biden’s Justice Department charged former President Trump in June 2023 with 40 federal charges related to his alleged mishandling of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago residence. In early May, Judge Aileen Cannon postponed this trial indefinitely. 

Latest developments: There have not been any major developments, but the recent Supreme Court decision in Trump v. United States may affect this criminal proceeding as well. In a concurring opinion, Justice Thomas openly questioned the constitutionality of the existence of an Office of the Special Counsel, opening a lane for the position held by Special Counsel Jack Smith to be challenged in a lower court. Earlier this month, Trump’s attorneys argued before Cannon in a hearing that Smith’s appointment was unlawful. Presumably, were that office to be eliminated, his actions — charging a former president — would be mooted. 

Washington, D.C.:  Prosecution by Biden DOJ for Jan. 6 Speech

How we got here: In this federal criminal case, Special Counsel Jack Smith charged former President Trump with four counts of conspiracy and obstruction related to his actions on Jan. 6, 2021. President Trump’s lawyers have argued that immunity extends to actions taken by a president while acting in his official capacity and that, in any event, the First Amendment protects his right to raise legitimate questions about a questionable election process.

Latest developments: On Monday, the Supreme Court issued a major decision in Trump v. United States, which significantly affects Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution of President Trump for his actions on Jan. 6, 2021.

In Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court determined that a former president is entitled “to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution” for “actions within [the President’s] conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority.” These would be actions such as presidential pardons, vetos of legislation, naming and managing agency officials, and recognizing foreign governments. Further, for anything else a president does that is within the “outer perimeter of the president’s official responsibilities,” there is still a presumption of immunity from criminal prosecution. The scope of what falls within this “outer perimeter” will be determined by a lower court, but presumptively anything done by a president when acting in that capacity, rather than
a strictly campaign capacity, could well carry with it immunity.

The Supreme Court ultimately remanded the case to the District Court to now determine factually whether President Trump’s Jan. 6 conduct qualifies as official or unofficial. 

This comes on the heels of the Supreme Court’s decision in Fischer v. United States which may result in at least two of the four counts against President Trump being dropped due to the Justice Department’s overreach on application of an obstruction statute.

The Supreme Court’s ruling will also affect the other pending legal cases against President Trump in New York, Georgia, and Florida. 

New York: Lawsuit by A.G. Letitia James for Inflating Net Worth

How we got here: Democrat Attorney General Letitia James — who campaigned on going after Trump — sued former President Trump alleging that he misled banks, insurers, and others about his net worth to obtain loans, although none of the parties involved claimed to have been injured. Following a no-jury trial, Judge Arthur Engoron issued a decision in February ordering Trump to pay a $454 million penalty. Trump has appealed this decision and posted a required $175 million appeal bond

Latest developments: This case remains mostly on hold.



Gavin Newsom Heads to White House to Rally Support for Joe Biden

Sundance reporting for Conservative Treehouse 

Oh, they’re good… the Pelosi clan are really good.

I once saw an interview with Nancy Pelosi’s daughter where she was asked about her mom and Alexandra Pelosi said something very matter-of-factly like, “my mom can smile, slice your neck with a razor blade and you’d never know she did it.”  That’s the thought that comes to mind within this story.

Gavin Newsom is heading to the White House with various governors to meet with Joe Biden.  However, Newsom is going to show “support” for Biden remaining in the 2024 presidential race.  I mean, this guy with the invisible blades is good, really good.

SACRAMENTO, California — Gov. Gavin Newsom will travel to Washington on Wednesday to attend a meeting between President Joe Biden and Democratic governors amid the fallout from the president’s disastrous debate with former President Donald Trump.

“Governor Newsom will head to White House tomorrow to attend the Governors meeting and to stand with the President,” a spokesperson for the California Democrat said late Tuesday.

As White House aides scramble to tamp down fears about the president’s cognitive abilities in the wake of Thursday’s shaky debate performance, Biden will gather with Democratic governors and congressional leaders Wednesday evening. The meeting follows a Monday call when two dozen Democratic governors gathered to discuss among themselves how they should respond to the crisis situation.

Newsom, whose name frequently appears in polls alongside other Democratic surrogates like Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker as potential replacements, was not on the call.

Newsom is a steadfast Biden supporter and was on hand in Atlanta last week to try to buoy the president from the spin room after the debate that saw the 81-year-old incumbent appearing confused and struggling to answer some questions. Newsom, while acknowledging a lackluster performance, quickly dismissed calls for Biden to step aside, saying that the American public should look at his record in office — not a 90-minute debate.

Newsom has continued offering vocal — and financial — support for the Biden campaign in the days since the debate, helping raise several hundred thousand dollars for the president and the Democratic National Committee in the hours after it aired. (read more)



Democrat Governors Meet With Joe Biden. What They Say After Raises Big Questions.


Nick Arama reporting for RedState 

At this point, the calls are coming loud and fast, even from Democrats for Joe Biden to step aside. But Biden is saying he's not going to quit. He's still living in delusion. 

He allegedly let people know he was staying in on a campaign call.

"Let me say this as clearly as I possibly can as simply and straightforward as I can: I am running…no one’s pushing me out. I’m not leaving. I’m in this race to the end and we’re going to win.”

On Wednesday afternoon, he met with Democratic governors to try to reassure them as to his candidacy. Here's the list of the governors that he met with. 

The governors who spoke to the press after the meeting were Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Maryland Gov. Wes Moore (the guy whose biceps Biden admires), and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul. The short form is that the governors said that Biden had always had their backs, so they were going to have his back. Then they tried to pretend like there wasn't a problem and convince us that all was just hunky dory. 

I don't think they're going to convince anyone with this flailing effort. 

They claimed it was an "honest" conversation. When you love someone you tell them the truth, Moore said. 

Hochul sounded a bit like it was a hostage video, "We're in it to win it." 

"Biden is our nominee," Moore said. Walz claimed that he was "fit for office." 

The flailing was a bit sad. Do they really think this is going to convince people that things are just fine? They don't even have Biden come out with them. What does that say? 

Moore said the choice in November was between someone who had delivered and someone who was downright dangerous. Moore got it right, but a little twisted. It's Biden who's the one who's downright dangerous. 

Walz said Biden had "delivered" - that alone should tell you how delusional they are, since all Biden has "delivered" on is higher inflation for everyone and more chaos all around the world that has harmed the United States. But they think that they can buffalo us all here with this dog and pony show when all they did was demonstrate how desperate they are over Joe Biden's problems. 

On top of that, notice who else was missing from the remarks here. Where are the two people at the meeting whose names have frequently come up in discussions about replacing Biden? Where are California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer? They are oddly missing from these remarks. While they didn't speak after the meeting, Whitmer and Newsom posted tweets on Wednesday saying they were supporting Biden. 

Did they not endorse what was said or not want to go on the record like the cowards they are? The people missing said more by their absence than the people who spoke. 


Top Dem Donor Savages Biden for 'Deceiving the American People,' Posts Video That Decimates Him

Brutal Leaked Internal Polling for Biden Shows Just How Badly the Debate Damaged Him