Wednesday, June 12, 2024

Biden and the Left Demonize Trump Supporters


In business, they say the customer is always right. This was long true in politics too. No one dared to attack voters, even when they supported an opponent. The voters were all Americans who had a right to their own opinions. Those on the margins were always in play.

This was one of the salutary customs of American political life. Such respect for the voters and their collective judgment supported the peaceful transfer of power.

This is why all the recent celebration of Our Democracy™ rings false. Apparently, Our Democracy™ means something different than the literal words. When invoked by President Joe Biden and his supporters, it equates to “good government,” an idea more about their preferred substantive ends like abortion rights and gay marriage than a celebration of the procedures through which leaders are chosen.

While ordinary democracy is mostly about elections, Our Democracy™ includes management of those elections and control of the flow of information to prevent voters from selecting dangerous outsiders like Donald Trump.

When Trump won the presidential election in 2016, there was no celebration of democracy. Indeed, the media, Hillary, and many of the people now singing the praises of Our Democracy™ went into overdrive talking about Russian interference, the supposed scourge of disinformation, and the dark heart of Red State Americans. They concocted this critique to obscure Trump’s democratic mandate.

The left typically calls the results of a democratic election “populism” when it doesn’t go the way they want. Like “isolationism,” this is one of those incantations about a supposed political evil where the nature of that evil is never really established. Populism was bad because it caused a glitch in the system they thought they fully controlled. The political class was surprised because the demographic changes they engineered through immigration were supposed to guarantee the left retained permanent power. 

From the beginning, the entire system has been allergic to Trump. Much of it comes down to taste and style. Trump does not talk or think like the managerial political class, and he does not respect what they deem to be sacred. He is an avatar for the allegedly uncouth, hateful, racist, and backward people of the hinterlands. Trump is correct when he says, “They are coming after me, because I am fighting for you.”

Anti-Trump rhetoric has always existed alongside rhetoric demonizing his supporters. Biden’s creepy speech in Philadelphia attacking “MAGA Americans” in 2022 put the demonization of voters on prominent display. But it goes deeper. It also includes the 2016 campaign to harass those who attended Trump rallies and Hillary’s revealing description of Trump supporters as a “basket of deplorables.”

For opponents, Trump voters were never just wrong, mistaken, confused, bamboozled, possessed of different values, or simply fellow Americans. They were backwards, racist, malevolent, hateful, and unpatriotic. They were collectively guilty and deserved to be collectively punished.

The problem is worse than anonymous rhetoric on Twitter and the content of Biden’s speeches. It includes doubling down on January 6 prosecutions, attempts to keep Trump off the ballot, and stretching the law to pursue narrow partisan purposes, such as the recent prosecution of a whistleblower doctor who exposed illegal transgender procedures in a Houston hospital or using FBI SWAT teams to go after pro-life activists. 

In short, Biden’s frequent talk of Our Democracy™ is a smokescreen. He and the broader left have no faith in the electorate, voting, or majority rule, as well as absolute hatred for at least a plurality of voters.

This is the reason for all of the handwringing over disinformation, misinformation and populism. This is the reason they want to reengineer the American people through mass immigration. Biden and the governing class believe that government should be left up to the professionals and that the American people need to be persuaded, managed, cajoled, revised, and, if necessary, forced to ratify the professionals’ desires.

Admittedly, the right has become more contemptuous and hostile to leftist voters as well. But the Republicans in power have not wielded their power against individual opponents to the same extent as Biden and the Democrats. For example, Trump threatened Hilary with jail in 2016, while Biden and his surrogates actually delivered against Trump.

In what may prove to be the start of a “war of all against all,” there is more and more talk by Republicans of retaliation, including partisan prosecutions of Biden and his people if Trump wins in November. We are fast becoming a nation of enemies.

We do know for sure that a second Biden term will be ugly. The Democrats will be out for blood. Up to the present, they have violated numerous norms by going against Trump and his lieutenants, but there is still some fear of accountability in November and thus some restraint. If they can figure out a way to rig this election—in which Biden faces more headwinds than 2020—they will be completely emboldened and unrestrained.

The left-in-power manifests a belief that they can keep a lid on discontent by prosecuting and intimidating their opponents. Perhaps they are right. While I am loathe to admit it, the draconian response to January 6 has done a lot to deter organic, right-wing street activism. There has been no MAGA equivalent of the large street protests seen recently in Brazil and France. There has certainly been no right-wing iteration of the 2020 Summer of Riots.

In other words, the age of revolution may be over. People are too wedded to their lifestyles, safety, and sense of powerlessness to do anything other than vote and then shrug in the face of stolen elections and creeping tyranny.

That said, history is full of surprises. If the left solidifies its grip on power and gives people no peaceful options for change, what other choices have they really left our angry and very well-armed population?



X22, And we Know, and more- June 12

 




Combatting the ‘Long Count’


Remember how the Democrat mantra was “every vote must be counted” rather than every legal vote being counted? In my August 1, 2023 essay, Beware the ‘Long Count’, I discussed the mechanics of this new phenomenon.

With modern computer technology and high-speed scanners, we’re told we must count votes well past election day, even with early voting available long before election day. This is true in many jurisdictions, particularly and notably in big, “blue” Democrat cities. We know that, in November 2024, Democrats will inevitably re-employ long counts in these cities in hopes of again creating enough chaos to distort the process and enable counting until our corrupt, doddering, senile “President” might again miraculously be declared “victorious” after lightly campaigning around naps, feedings, and diaper changes.

In “Beware the ‘Long Count,’ I also introduced the concept of the “bogey,” another of the keys to voter fraud. The bogey represents the vote differential between the Republican candidate (who is leading) and the Democrat (who is trailing) when the in-person election polls close.

Once the polls close and Democrats determine the bogey, they continue counting, either by repeatedly scanning the same [Democrat] ballots or by bringing in additional pre-printed ballots from outside until enough ballots are “counted” (really created, retrieved, or recounted), until they’ve assured a Democrat victory. We all remember in 2020 in Atlanta, Las Vegas, Milwaukee, Philadelphia, and Phoenix that the ‘Long Count’ resulted in a Democrat win—every single time. The same technique and outcome played out in Phoenix in 2022.

Therefore, the bogey must be made undeterminable until counting in lawless jurisdictions is completed and certified, regardless of how long counting takes. Let’s use Pennsylvania in 2020 as an example. Was what happened logical?

It has often been said that, for electoral purposes, Pennsylvania is “Philadelphia and Pittsburgh with Alabama in-between.” Pittsburgh falls completely within Allegheny County. Philadelphia within Philadelphia County. There are 65 other counties for a total of 67 counties. In 2020, Biden “won” 13, with Trump winning 54. Below is the 2020 Presidential electoral map:

Image by TylerKutschbachCC BY 4.0.

We all remember going to bed late on election day, November 3, 2020, with President Trump leading in Pennsylvania by roughly 600,000 votes, only to wake up on November 4, 2020, and learning that not only was Philadelphia still counting, but it had somehow miraculously found slightly more than 600,000votes that night, when nobody was watching, throwing the election to Biden.

In November 2020, there were approximately 13 million Pennsylvanians, 10mof whom were of voting age. If we assume that 10% either are ineligible (for various reasons) or just do not vote, the pool of voters shrinks to 9 million, almost equal to the number of registered voters.

Roughly 7 million votes were cast, an unusually strong 78% voter turnout. It was up (a fishy) 17% from the 2016 presidential election, which had a [closer to historical] 66% voter turnout. This was “explained” to us as either “cuz Covid” or by having any questions about the turnout labeled as a racist, white supremacist, or a “conspiracy theory.”

Does it make sense that more than 600,000 votes, equal to 6.7% of all votes cast statewide, miraculously appeared after midnight, after election day, after all other counties had reported, in two overwhelmingly blue eastern counties, Montgomery and Philadelphia, almost all of which went to Biden, a staggering flood of overnight votes that enabled Biden to overtake President Trump and ultimately snatch victory from the jaws of defeat?

That is a rhetorical question. Of course, it doesn’t make sense. Libertarian Icon Ayn Rand once said, “Reason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it. Leave them alone.” Nevertheless, this is what we are facing once again.

So, what to do?

Most importantly, the Supreme Court’s decision in 1997’s Foster v. Love, which prohibits long counts, must be honored and long counts disallowed and, if they happen, nullified. See, “Elections Undecided by Midnight are Void & Preempted by Federal Law.”

However, given the GOP’s fecklessness in enforcing the Supreme Court’s mandate, there must be no bogey. The Republican-led county commissioners and election officials who conduct and control the elections in these 54 conservative Pennsylvania counties must refuse to report their results until Pittsburgh and Philadelphia have completed counting, reported, and certified their results, even if it means withholding their own results for weeks post-election day. Indeed, this must happen in all states, particularly the battleground states of Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin.

Without a bogey, what will the Philadelphia and Pittsburgh Bolshevik Democrats do? Without knowing whether they have enough votes to ensure a Democrat victory, do they keep counting? Stop counting? Find more votes for insurance purposes? And for how long?

In this scenario, without the bogey, they don’t know how many votes they need. What should they do? Go nuclear? What would that mean? 120% voter turnout in Allegheny, Montgomery and Philadelphia counties? Might that be considered reasonable evidence of voter fraud, even if a “Democrat” is elected? It would certainly create a situation that will be interesting to observe.

Naturally, this approach to ending counting fraud requires a spine and immense moral courage on the part of the elected officials in the Republican counties, which is by no means guaranteed. These officials must remain steadfast and united because it currently seems that this is one of a very few techniques that can assure at least a modicum of fairness in an election where voter rolls are notoriously dirty, mail-in ballots are again sent out indiscriminately, harvesting and drop boxes are deployed, and the ‘Long Count’ is again employed. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. 



Trump Is Doing Crazy Well - Time to Get Suspicious


I want to hear what I want to hear, but when I hear what I want to hear, I always get a little suspicious. Am I just hearing what I want to hear and ignoring what I don’t want to hear? Am I deluding myself? So, when I see the amazing poll numbers that Trump is posting right now, I take it with a mountain of sodium chloride. Yeah, those numbers are solid. Yeah, those numbers are consistent. Yeah, maybe I am hearing what I want to hear, but maybe that is because what I want to hear is true.

Those numbers are impressive. He’s ahead in most of the battlegrounds. North Carolina is barely even one anymore, and he has shown consistent and substantial leads in Nevada, Georgia, and Arizona for a while. Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin are closer, but he’s right there with Biden and often (but not always ahead). That’s all awesome, but the one that really struck me is the polling in Virginia showing him in a tie with Crusty McDaddyshowers.

Virginia. Viginia?

We haven’t won Virginia since I don’t know when. Over the years, we finally gave up calling it purple and accepted its essential blueness. But then it elected Glenn Youngkin, as well as a hard-red lieutenant governor and attorney general. We thought that was a fluke, but now, who knows? If Virginia is really in play – and I am unwilling to fully accept that it is until this positive polling becomes a trend – then this election is over before the first vote is cast, which, under the commie rules in the cheating blue states, will probably be next week.

I did not see this coming. I freely admit that I thought that Donald Trump had a natural ceiling of about 47%, that over half of Americans would never vote for him under any circumstances because of his Trumpiness. Well, we are not experiencing just any set of circumstances. Thanks to the work of His Incontinence, this is shaping up to be a nearly perfect wave of Democrat failure.

I always expected Joe Biden to be terrible, but he has managed to exceed even my high expectations for incompetence, corruption, and general loathsomeness. Biden has failed at literally everything he has done in office. Most presidents have some wins to trot out, but what is there to brag about with this guy? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. The economy is a disaster. So is the border. So is our foreign policy. Crime is up. Perversion is up. DEI race-hustling is up. His minions are so desperate that they just flat-out lie even when the truth is obvious to anyone with a pulse – they insist that the economy is great, and then the voters have to spend $12 on a Big Mac. 

He’s a catastrophe wrapped in a disaster. When the achievements of Jimmy Carter outshine you, you don’t just suck – you super-suck. When he calls for four more years – and the actuarial tables beg to differ – he’s not making a promise but a threat.

And damn, did he get old in the last few years. He hasn’t been fresh since back when he was stealing Neil Kinnock’s resume, but now he’s positively ancient. The guy is a crusty mess. He shuffles about, mumbling incoherently, threatening to fight people, doing that weird whisper thing. Everyone knows he’s ancient and senile, but his handlers go with their classic denials. Why, he’s as sharp as a tack, just in secret, like that Ronald Reagan SNL skit from the good old days come to life. It’s just an act to lull America’s opponents into letting their guard down! Of course, on debate night  – assuming he does not pull out because “I will not share a debate stage with a convicted felon, only my Thanksgiving table!” – he’ll be swaddled in Depends and hopped up on goofballs.

Some of Trump’s support is really voters voting against Joe Biden personally and against his policies. But there are affirmative reasons to vote for Trump, like his record of economic and foreign policy success. People really do remember the Trump years – pre-COVID, at least – as prosperous and peaceful. This drives the left up the wall – they are constantly trying to “correct the record” by explaining to people that they were actually miserable and impoverished during the greatest economic boom since the Eighties.

He has also turbocharged the Trump br, assisted by the Democrats’ fascist attempts to throw him in jail for the crime of beating them. Trump voters are unbelievably motivated. They cannot wait to go out there and mail in their ballot – Trump has wisely gotten on board with early voting and ballot banking. In contrast, who is eager to see Biden reelected? Only commies, criminals, cartels that smuggle illegal aliens, and his fake doctor wife.

Trump’s campaign is much, much better run this time. It’s all loyalists – you do not see the infighting and leaks that characterized past campaign organizations. His people are pros, focused, and professional. They took having him tied-up in court for six prime weeks and turned what should have been a liability into an asset. Speaking of assets, the campaign has collected hundreds of millions of dollars in just a few weeks. Hell, if that Democrat judge puts Trump in jail, we might just be able to get him elected by acclamation.

And there is another important factor at play. The 2024 Trump is not Trumpy. Trump is not doing what he did before that drove away potential voters. The tweetstorms are gone – he’s off Twitter, and barely anyone sees what he’s saying on Truth Social. Thanks to the ham-handed campaign to frame him, Trump has managed to make himself look like a victim, an image reinforced by the fact that he actually is a victim of a disgusting and disgraceful campaign that has totally blown back on its sponsors.

Of course, election day is five months off. Lots can happen and may well happen on the Democrat side if Biden somehow falls out through political maneuverings or age– a not insignificant possibility. Trump could make some hideous mistake, though he has always overcome the gaffes in the past. And there is the ever-present challenge of black swan events – who knows what disaster Biden’s incompetence might bring upon us? I can think of one particularly terrifying possibility.

But right now, Trump seems to be on the way to pulling off the Full Grover Cleveland. He’s doing well – too well. Don’t take anything for granted. As the great Instapundit warns, don’t get cocky. Be suspicious, be skeptical, and instead of getting cocky, work twice as hard and run up the score.




🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓


Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Vancouver equity committee wants Mayor Ken Sim to account for his colonial family history

 Except there’s one catch:

Sim is a second-generation immigrant born to parents from Hong Kong. 

A Green Party Vancouver city councillor moved a motion that would require Mayor Ken Sim to acknowledge his family’s colonial and settler roots.

According to the “anti-racism and decolonization "education” motion before the Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities, Councillor Pete Fry wants to mandate anti-racism education for the city’s leadership. 

Fry is the son of Vancouver Centre Liberal MP Hedy Fry. 

“The City of Vancouver is open with its commitment to anti-racism, decolonization, reconciliation and dismantling white supremacy,” reads the motion. 

According to Fry, the motion was presented by him in his role as the liaison for the Cultural Equity Advisory Committee. 

“In my own opinion, reconciliation is the recognition and repair of harms to indigenous people as a result of colonization and oppression,” Fry told True North.

“Decolonization is a larger framework that recognizes harms resulting from colonization. So while Ken Sim’s is a settler family (ie non-indigenous) his family also suffered legacies of colonialism and historic white supremacy.”

The councillor also stated that he doesn’t believe the motion was about “assigning blame or guilt.” 

“It’s about learning and understanding historic inequities,” said Fry.

Fry requests that anti-racism training be introduced for the mayor and City Council that addresses the “distinctions between decolonization and reconciliation.”

Furthermore, Fry is demanding that the mayor and councillors acknowledge “their settler land acknowledgement/colonial stories on how they came to this land dating back to the first settler from their family history.” 

Funding for the proposed education sessions would come from the mayor’s and councillors’ travel and training expense budgets. 

According to Sim, his parents immigrated to Canada from Hong Kong in 1967 following a period of upheaval. 

Three of Sim’s older siblings were also born in Hong Kong, while Sim was born in Vancouver in 1970.

True North reached out to Sim to ask if he would support the motion but did not receive a response. 


Hunter’s Conviction Is A Fig Leaf To Cover The Biden Family’s More Serious Crimes


The verdict ‘is functionally irrelevant because the corrupt Biden regime has already proven that the entire justice system is rigged.’



Hunter Biden was found guilty Tuesday on three federal gun charges, but his conviction is no victory for the rule of law. The trial sidestepped the most serious allegations against Biden — and their implications for his president father — while teeing up talking points for Biden supporters to insist the justice system is fair after the left brazenly weaponized the justice system to target former President Donald Trump.

President Joe Biden’s son was found guilty of lying on application paperwork while addicted to drugs to obtain a firearm and unlawfully possessing said firearm.

Leftists like MSNBC’s Andrew Weissmann, desperate to absolve themselves of accountability for cheering on the weaponization of the justice system against Trump, have already begun using Hunter’s conviction to declare the justice system works just fine since Hunter was also found guilty.

But as Federalist CEO Sean Davis aptly noted shortly before Hunter’s conviction, “any verdict in the gun trial is functionally irrelevant because the corrupt Biden [administration] has already proven that the entire justice system is rigged.”

For starters, IRS whistleblowers came forward last summer alleging the Department of Justice slow-walked investigations into Hunter and “even concealed critical evidence implicating President Joe Biden in a criminal bribery scheme,” as my colleague Tristan Justice wrote.

Furthermore, “President Biden’s politically appointed U.S. Attorneys for D.C. and Central District of California denied the U.S. Attorney in Delaware’s request to bring charges, which … put Hunter Biden on the path to a sweetheart plea deal,” as the House Oversight Committee explained.

That sweetheart deal was set to exculpate Hunter from “any other federal crimes” he may have committed by allowing him to plead guilty to two misdemeanor tax offenses while avoiding responsibility for the gun charges by entering into a deferred prosecution agreement, as explained by Steve Roberts, Jonathan Fahey, and Andrew Pardue for The Federalist. The plea deal fell apart after scrutiny from a federal judge which led to prosecutors being unwilling to accept the blanket immunity request.

Hunter does face additional charges in September for some tax charges after he allegedly dodged more than $1.4 million in taxes. But the DOJ — according to IRS whistleblowers — allowed the statute of limitations to expire on Hunter’s alleged tax evasion between 2014 and 2015, the same years he was being paid big bucks by Ukrainian energy firm Burisma. Hunter was paid as much as $83,000 per month to sit on the firm’s board, where his primary contribution appeared to be the Biden “brand” and access to his then-vice president father. Around that time, then-Vice President Joe Biden — by his own admission — threatened to withhold aid to Ukraine unless a top prosecutor who was investigating Burisma’s leadership was fired.

Hunter never registered as a foreign agent despite admitting during a closed-door hearing before the House Oversight Committee that he received multiple payments from Chinese Communist Party-linked businesses. His father, during the 2020 presidential debate, claimed his son never “made money” from China.

There are also concerns from the House Oversight Committee that the “DOJ disregarded the victims who were sexually exploited by Hunter Biden” after Hunter allegedly paid prostitutes “and used such payments as tax expenses for one of his companies.”

As my colleague John Daniel Davidson summarized, “Hunter Biden can run a complex, years-long foreign influence-peddling scheme to enrich his family, and all he’ll ever face are minor, unrelated gun charges — a fig leaf over the corruption that’s right at the heart of the White House.”

“The entire purpose of the trial is to provide a thin veneer of justice served, while the real crimes of the Biden family go unpunished and unacknowledged,” Davidson continued.



How Long Can Democrats Keep Up the Joe Biden Charade?


My mom used to say that "getting old isn't for sissies." The older I get, the more I realize how right she was. Even when we try to eat healthy, get enough sleep, and exercise, all of the things they tell us to do, eventually, certain parts of the body just ain't what they used to be. For most of us, we plan to fight the inevitability of getting old as long as we can. But sometimes, sadly, it is not the body checking out, it's the mind. There are few people who have not had to watch a loved one mentally drift away. I watched my mother-in-law forget who her children were. It's bad enough when it is happening within the confines of your family, but what about on the world stage for all to see? More and more Americans believe that is what they are witnessing happen to President Joe Biden. 


Throughout his presidency, we have watched Joe Biden, currently the oldest president at age 81, go from a bombastic extrovert to a stumbling confused old man who slurs his words and has trouble completing a sentence. At first, it was here and there, just enough for conservative media to point it out and mainstream media to defend him. Joe Biden was always a gaffe-prone individual, but it can no longer be classified as just gaffes, and it is no longer harmless. On Monday, during a Juneteenth White House celebration, as musicians entertained the crowd and everyone danced and enjoyed the music, Joe Biden stood motionless, staring straight ahead, as if he had no idea why he was there and what was happening. Anyone who looks at the minute-long video should be profoundly disturbed.


It was a stark difference from the amped-up State of the Union speech Biden gave back in March. During that speech, Biden appeared angry and impassioned, and there was speculation that he had been pharmacologically assisted. I am not a doctor and I don't play one at RedState, but in light of Monday night's video, this is an election year, how long can the Democrats keep this up? The debate between Biden and Donald Trump is roughly two weeks away. Granted that's not a lot of time, but Joe Biden's mental state is not going to get any better. So, does the debate even happen? Do Joe Biden's handlers, just before debate time, come up with possibly a not-so-serious medical issue or possibly some "crisis" that he must attend to and thus cannot participate? 

Then there is the Democrat convention in August. a bit further out, but more time for Joe Biden's brain to malfunction. Do Democrats manage to get him through the debate and then, knowing how bad his condition is getting, prepare a switcheroo for the convention? Do they swap Joe for Gov. Hairgel, Gavin Newsom, and if so, what about Vice President Kamala Harris? How do they explain to the rapidly dwindling number of black Democrat voters why they went with the white guy over the black woman?

Democrats are being forced to play a desperate game of "beat the clock." It is a game they are not going to win. Back in March, an AP/NORC poll showed that63 percent of U.S. adults felt that they were "not very" or "not at all" confident in Biden's mental capacity to serve another term as president. Those numbers are not going to go down the closer we get to November. A recent Wall Street Journal article outlined the experiences of both Republicans and Democrats and their interactions with Biden, saying he "performed poorly at times," while the White House continues to insist that Biden is sharp as a tack.  

How long can Democrats keep it up? The convention, the debate? Do they just hide Joe Biden for as long as they can? At some point, they will be forced to do something. Who will blink first?   




Opinion: Trump’s ‘Revenge’ Needs to Be More Than Success, It Needs to Be Revenge


posted by Rusty Weiss at RedState 

Donald Trump has remained steadfast in his insistence that the only form of “revenge” he will be exacting in a second term will be success.

Success equates to America’s well-being. And a thriving America equates to a decimation of the Democrat agenda.

It seems logical.

The presumptive Republican nominee made that stance crystal clear even as a malicious Democrat attorney general in New York named Letitia James extracted a $354 million fine from him over well-established real estate practices.

“I don’t care about the revenge thing. I know they usually use the word revenge. Will there be revenge?” he said at a town hall meeting in February. “My revenge will be success.”

Trump reiterated the notion even as a malicious Democrat district attorney in Alvin Bragg used a heavily weighted court and jury to secure 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in late May.

"My revenge will be success," he said once more.

It sounds good. But is it enough?

Strange times, this country finds itself in. Where once impeachment was used in rare circumstances, Democrats found a way to weaponize it twice over mundane reasons – a phone call and a call to peacefully protest.

The Biden administration has weaponized every facet of the Justice Department to jail their political opponents.

The opposition party has made it clear they will use any means necessary and at their disposal to rid the country of conservative and/or Republican voters. 

Trump needs a similar mindset on day one if he finds himself back in the White House in January 2025. The time for playing nice is over.

You can’t "drain the swamp" without actually draining the swamp that has gone after you for years. The DOJ needs a thorough, detailed cleaning. The far-left faction of the department loathes the country they work for.

The State Department is a bastion of Democrat donors. That department could use a hose-down as well.

The IRS? President Biden has funded the hiring of tens of thousands of agents for a government entity that was caught red-handed targeting conservatives. Abolish them.

The woke military was establishing back channels to China and vowed to warn them if Trump, as president, had authorized an attack. Literal treason.

Members of the Republican Party in recent years have helped fund Ukraine at the expense of border security. You may recall that Congress, just a few short years ago, refused to give Trump $5 billion for a border wall but now seemingly gives President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that amount once a month.

How many of those same cowards stood by and allowed the former president’s political persecution to continue unabated? Or worse, helped foment that persecution? They sacrifice the security of the American people and the agenda of their chosen president to placate those they claim are the opposition.

But they’re all on the same side. These people are all America last. Donald Trump is America first.

Yes, his success will be a form of revenge against the uni-party whose sole motivation is power. The reverse, though, is equally true. 

Striking back at lawmakers who refuse to make America great again is essential to a thriving America. Striking back at the deep state and the corrupt justice system is essential to a restoration of faith in the rule of law. 

Striking back means America excels. Trump’s revenge is not only encouraged to restore America to greatness, it is required. 

Trump recently told Fox News host Sean Hannity that people who expect him to seek retribution are wrong.

"It has to stop, because otherwise, we're not going to have a country,” he said.

To the contrary, we’re not going to have a country if Biden, the Democrats, and weak-kneed Republicans aren’t stopped. 

If Trump is under the impression that they won’t continue to take him down as president in a second term, that they won’t pursue the next man or woman behind him with the same criminal vigor, that they will stop their systematic destruction of a once great nation any time soon, he’s sadly mistaken.

The left has shown you how to play the game, Mr. Trump. Now, go out there and win it using their rules. 

For the good of this nation.



FBI Interrogates Co-Workers About Whistleblower’s Views On COVID Vax, Trump, And Second Amendment

The FBI revoked the agent’s security clearance and questioned co-workers about the suspended agent’s political views.



The FBI Security Division questioned employees about a fellow agent’s views on COVID vaccines, Donald Trump, and a Second Amendment rally, according to whistleblower disclosures made to the Department of Justice’s Office of Inspector General on Saturday. This revelation raises more concerns that the FBI’s leadership has become hopelessly politicized and seeks to purge itself of agents with certain disfavored views.

Late Monday, The Federalist obtained a copy of the June 8, 2024, letter sent by Empower Oversight on behalf of its client, an unnamed whistleblower and now-retired FBI agent, to Inspector General Michael Horowitz. Enclosed with the letter were three separate interview forms used by the FBI Security Division in questioning co-workers about the whistleblower. 

The preprinted document opened by stating that the Clearance Investigations Unit was conducting an administrative investigation regarding allegations that the agent had engaged in conduct that called into question his ability to maintain a top-secret security clearance. The introductory comments then informed the FBI employees that they had a duty to reply to the questions and that failure to reply fully could result in their own security clearances being revoked.

A series of questions followed, with co-workers quizzed on whether the agent under investigation had: “Vocalize[d] support for President Trump?” “Vocalized objection to COVID-19 vaccination?” “Vocalized intent to attend 1/6/2021?” The FBI Security Division also required co-workers to state whether they were aware the target of the investigation had attended the Richmond Lobby Day event, which is an annual Second Amendment rally in Virginia.

The Empower Oversight letter stressed the impropriety of these questions by quoting the Supreme Court’s pronouncement: “If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.”

Further, as the high court has held, “the First Amendment protects political association as well as political expression,” and such protections display our “profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open…”

That the FBI Security Division had a preprinted form used to interview employees about their co-worker’s views about Trump and the COVID shot, as well as that co-worker’s attendance at political events, represents a repulsive infringement on the rights of citizens. 

It is one thing to determine if the agent under investigation had breached the Capitol, committed any crimes, or advocated for others to engage in illegal acts. But none of the questions posed had anything to do with those legitimate issues.

The whistleblower’s lawyers stress that point in their letter to the inspector general, writing that the FBI “has legitimate reasons to revoke the security clearances of employees who engage in or support unlawful acts, particularly those designed to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power.” They continued, “But our client did not do any of those things.”

Yet the FBI revoked the agent’s security clearance and questioned his or her co-workers about the suspended agent’s views on political matters. It’s disturbing enough that the FBI apparently believes those who favor Trump or support the Second Amendment represent a security risk, but by focusing on an agent’s position on COVID vaccinations, the bureau has exposed its true agenda: to weed out anyone with “wrongthink.” 

And it worked: In this case, the agent retired rather than remain suspended without pay. He nonetheless hopes to regain his clearance, which would allow for other career opportunities. The whistleblower’s complaint, however, seeks something more: for the inspector general’s office to investigate the FBI’s apparent methodical abuse of the security clearance process in violation of the First Amendment to determine the scope of the abuses and the individuals responsible.