Here’s What Trump Should Do Now to Win the Debates Before They Happen

posted by Derek Hunter at Townhall 

When Joe Biden released a 14 second video with 5 edits in it declaring how he wants to debate Donald Trump twice, my first thought was how pathetic is it that he can’t get through a few lines without needing multiple takes and heavy editing. My next thought was Trump should take him up on the offer, which he did. Then, I had another thought, a better thought. Something that I believe will help Donald Trump immeasurably.

The Biden campaign wants two debates, one in June and the other in September, both well ahead of the November election, which is odd. They say it’s because of early voting, but there’s more to it than that.

If Biden soils the sheets in a June debate, that gives Democrats plenty of time to find a new nominee before their convention in August. If Biden drops out before being officially nominated there is no need for lawsuits to change ballots, it’s all nice and clean.

As for the September date, there’s still plenty of time to distract voters from a failed performance. 

More than that, however, this proposal opens up a big opportunity for the Trump campaign. They’d have to wait until everything is settled and all debate points are agreed upon, if only to make it impossible for Biden to back out without having to go against what his campaign would have said publicly. But once that happens, Trump should challenge Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to a series of debate.

Conventional consultants would advise against that, saying it lowers the Trump brand to debate a third-party candidate, but that wouldn’t happen. Trump is his own brand, and while the idea of lowering a candidate’s prestige would apply to someone normal, he’s not normal. Trump is Trump, and nothing changes that. 

It wouldn’t be Trump sinking to third-party level, it would be raising RFK to Trump’s level.

By raising up RFK you highlight how Biden is not only afraid to engage in more debates, but also expose how the two of them old many of the same positions. That would cut into Biden’s support, splitting the Democrat vote. Win-win.

You also show just how far gone Biden’s brain is. Democrats who watch will see a candidate articulating what they support in a way that doesn’t seem like an old guy confused by the buffet at lunch time. Either way, it hurts Biden.

Let’s be honest, if you’re going to vote for Joe Biden you will never be convinced to vote for Donald Trump. Biden is terrible, but his voters do not care. They either are insulated from the consequences of Bidenomics or just hate Donald Trump to the point that nothing is going to make a difference to them.

On the other hand, they might be impressed by Kennedy and persuaded away from Biden to a candidate who shares their views but isn’t senile. And any vote taken away from Biden is a win. 

This will, naturally, cause fits in the Biden campaign, which is why you don’t announce it until the terms for debates are agreed upon, making it difficult, if not impossible, to back out of. 

Then Trump and Republicans need to relentlessly invite Biden to join in that debate. He can’t – his whole campaign is based on appealing to his left flank, so he can’t be seen with Kennedy, who is genuinely of the left. 

No one open to the possibility of voting for Donald Trump is going to be convinced to vote Kennedy by anything RFK would have to say in a debate setting, but it would expose him to a larger audience and hurt Biden. It’s win-win for Trump.

Getting Joe Biden to debate at all is a victory for Trump and Adderall salesmen in Washington, DC. But, at least for Trump, it should just be the start of something bigger. Now that Joe has challenged Trump, and Trump quickly agreed, nail down the details and start hammering him for more.

Republicans have to be careful not to set expectations for Biden too low – if they do, all he’ll have to do is show up and not eat paste to claim to have exceeded them. 

Instead, they need to challenge him to do more, once all the T’s are crossed and I’s dotted on the details, elevate Robert Kennedy by setting the first debate with him a week after the first Trump/Biden debate in June, then dare Biden to join them on stage. He won’t, he can’t, but should be forced to refuse publicly. 

Then, no matter how Biden does during the debate, the story that emerges is he’s afraid to do more. That’s how you take a win, which getting him to debate is, into a series of wins. 

The Biden Reelection Strategy - Could He Win ?

 Bidenites believe they can reelect an unhealthy, unpopular, and unsuccessful president by any means necessary. And they may be right.

Joe Biden polls at or below 40 percent approval. Historically, such unpopularity has made it almost impossible for a president to be reelected.

His age advances by the hour. His voice falters, his memory fades, and his gait is reduced to short steps, with his arms, winglike and in tandem, offering balance.

Biden is not so much an octogenarian as an unhealthy and prematurely aging 80-year-old. It is America’s irony that he is fit for almost no other job in the country other than President, which apparently allows for a 3-day-a-week ceremonial role while others in the shadows run the country.

So how does Biden become renominated and reelected, as polls show he is behind in almost every critical swing state on nearly every issue?

Answer: not by campaigning, not by championing his record, and especially not by doubling down on his neo-socialist and now unpopular agendas.

Instead, his campaign is focused on four other strategies to beat Donald Trump.

First, left-wing local, state, and federal prosecutors are tying Trump up in court on crimes that have never been seen before and will never be again after the election. All the cases are politically motivated, with many coordinated with the White House.

Even if Trump is not convicted by blue-state prosecutors, in blue-state courtrooms, in front of blue-state juries, he will lose critical campaigning time.

Trump may end up paying out $1 billion in legal fees and fines. At 76, the monotonous days in court are designed to destroy him financially, physically, and mentally.

Biden and his operatives know that, in the long term, they may have fatally damaged the American legal system with such judicial sabotage. But short-term, they hope to destroy Trump before the ballots are cast.

Second, in his fourth year, Biden is suddenly selling government favors to special-interest voting blocs, or hoping to bring short-term relief to voters at the expense of long-term damage to the nation.

For elite college students and graduates, there are now billions of dollars in student-loan cancellations, despite a Supreme Court ruling declaring such targeted contractual amnesties illegal.

For consumers, before the election, Biden will likely drain the last drops from the critical Strategic Petroleum Reserve to lower gas prices—now sky-high due to his previous disastrous green policies.

If that is not enough, Biden has ordered Ukraine not to hit Russian oil facilities to avoid panic in the global petroleum markets before early and mail-in balloting begin.

Biden will quietly jawbone the Federal Reserve Bank to lower interest rates and reinflate the economy, despite his own creation of hyperinflation that caused interest rates to rise in the first place.

He will pander to Arab-American voters in swing-state Michigan by cutting arms deliveries to Israel, even as it seeks to destroy the killers of October 7.

And if that mollification is not sufficient to win Michigan, he will suddenly slap higher tariffs on imported Chinese electrical vehicles to win back apostate union auto workers.

Three, the left learned after 2016 that the only way to beat Trump is to change the way Americans vote.

So under the cover of the COVID-19 lockdown, the left sued in critical states to reduce Election Day to a mere construct, while 70 percent of voters mailed in their ballots or voted by early, rolling balloting over many weeks.

The key was the inability to fully authenticate votes, given the old practice of showing up on Election Day and presenting an ID was declared “racist.”

Four, Biden, as he did in 2020, will outsource his campaign to the media, 95 percent of which is left-wing. Talking televised heads will claim Biden is “sharp as a knife” while focusing on Trump’s tweets, Stormy Daniels, Michael Cohen, and lurid but irrelevant testimonies that permeate Trump’s court appearances.

Trump will continue to hold weekend-long, massive 100,000-person rallies, even in blue states. Meanwhile, Biden’s fixers in the media, administrative state, and legal community will counter that even with no crowds and no campaigning, Biden can win through 24/7 nonstop “October Surprises”—all summer long.

So expect more false “Russian collusion,” “laptop disinformation,” and “January 6 insurrection” hoaxes and their new replacements designed to smother the airwaves with salacious scandals nonstop.

Biden’s fading tenure is similar to the last sad months of Woodrow Wilson’s second term, when in 1919-20, the country was assured that a bedridden president was somehow hard at work, even as his wife, doctors, and handlers kept everyone else away.

Biden’s keepers do not seem to care about the president’s own failing health or his dismal polls. They discount his rare, anemic, and disastrous public appearances. They laugh off the huge Trump rallies. And they certainly could care less about the bad optics of pandering to special interests at the expense of the country or the damage done to the American legal and balloting systems.

Instead, Bidenites believe they can reelect an unhealthy, unpopular, and unsuccessful president by any means necessary.

And they may be right.

https://amgreatness.com/2024/05/16/the-biden-reelection-strategy/

If Joe Biden Is ‘Sharp As Ever,’ Why Is He Trying To Suppress The Hur Audio?

 There is no legal reason to withhold the audio, only a political one.

https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/16/if-joe-biden-is-sharp-as-ever-why-is-he-trying-to-suppress-the-hur-audio/

Joe Biden is as “sharp as ever,” a man blessed with “strong mental acuity,” and in possession of preternaturally incisive intellect. This is just some of the commentary we heard after Special Counsel Robert Hur let the president off the hook for pilfering classified documents because he was an “elderly man with a poor memory.”

If all of this is true, though, why is the president trying to suppress audio of the interview?

Merrick Garland, one of the most nakedly partisan AGs in memory, has advised Biden to argue that the audio falls under executive privilege, which exists to allow a president to engage in candid and confidential conversations with his advisers without worrying about public disclosure.

Garland’s argument is odd for two reasons.

The first, which seems especially pertinent, is that Hur isn’t an adviser to the president. Tasked with investigating Biden’s decades-long mishandling of classified documents, Hur didn’t offer the president any guidance or chew the fat or work on policy or swap confidential stories. Hur was trying to figure out why Biden was hoarding classified documents.

The only reason, we should recall, Hur let Biden walk was that he believed the president lacked the mental acuity to be charged by a jury for breaking the law. Which means the tape will be important in allowing the public to ascertain whether the president is senile. This part is especially pertinent considering the other major presidential candidate is being prosecuted for the same crime.

Second, we already have the transcripts of the conversation. How could the interview fall under executive privilege when we already know what was discussed?

Recall, as well, that Biden was cognizant enough to have lied about the interview, which gives us another reason to want to hear it. “There’s even a reference that I don’t remember when my son died,” Biden barked at reporters after Hur released the report. “How in the hell dare he raise that? Frankly, when I was asked the question, I thought to myself: It wasn’t any of their damn business.”

The transcript shows that Biden was the one who brought up his late son Beau, not Hur. The president claimed he believed Beau had died in 2017 or 2018 when he had died of brain cancer in 2015. I’m sorry, that’s not the kind of event that slips a healthy person’s mind. Perhaps a president who has spent years trying to emotionally manipulate the public with misleading claims about the cause of his son’s death was just confused.

What the attempted suppression of the audio tells us is that this interaction — and others — will have far more impact on audio. And the White House has basically admitted as much.

“The absence of a legitimate need for the audio recordings lays bare your likely goal — to chop them up, distort them, and use them for partisan political purposes,” White House Counsel Ed Siskel wrote in a letter to House Republicans. “Demanding such sensitive and constitutionally protected law enforcement materials from the executive branch because you want to manipulate them for potential political gain is inappropriate.”

First off, the tape is not “constitutionally protected law enforcement material,” whatever that means. There was never any expectation that the interview would not be made public. Nor is there anything “inappropriate” or illegal about using excerpts from an existing audio of a real conversation for political purposes. This is done thousands of times every year in political ads. Democrats have this habit of creating new rules whenever it suits them.

Moreover, one of the central arguments made by Republicans is that Biden isn’t mentally fit for the job. That’s a completely legitimate concern. It was a topic brought up in congressional hearings when Hur was grilled by Democrats. It should be a topic that real journalists are interested in figuring out. It is the kind of transparency that defenders of “democracy” should demand.

---

David Harsanyi is a senior editor at The Federalist, a nationally syndicated columnist, a Happy Warrior columnist at National Review, and author of five books—the most recent, Eurotrash: Why America Must Reject the Failed Ideas of a Dying Continent. Follow him on Twitter, @davidharsanyi.

DELIBERATE SABOTAGE: Immigration Is Still Massively SURGING Under Liberal Government

 INSANE.

Amid the crumbling of Canada’s social cohesion, the collapse of public services, and a housing affordability crisis that is among the worst in the developed world, the Liberals continue to deepen their deliberate sabotage of our country.

Marc Miller Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship

As you can see below, population growth is absolutely nuts – almost entirely driven by immigration:

Let’s call this exactly what it is:

THE DELIBERATE SABOTAGE OF OUR NATION.

The Liberals know what they are doing.

They know these insane immigration increases are wrecking the country.

Yet they are doing it anyway.

Canadians must understand this. All the economic pain, all the suffering, all the lost dreams and lost hope, all of it is because the Liberals want it to be this way.

Every day brings more and more evidence that the Liberals hate the Canadian People and are actively working to make our lives worse and worse.

Spencer Fernando

https://spencerfernando.com/2024/05/16/deliberate-sabotage-immigration-is-still-massively-surging-under-liberal-government/

And we Know and Badlands Media- May 16

 

The Trump Trial Farce Will Only Make Him Stronger

posted by Kurt Schlichter at Townhall 

There is little point in analyzing the bogus New York case against Donald Trump from a legal perspective because, of course, it’s not a legal matter. It’s a political matter. It’s a kangaroo court, an attempt to railroad a political opponent to keep him from winning the election against the desiccated, treacherous, corrupt old pervert whom he’s currently pummeling in the polls. But the legal realities are catching up to the people seeking to frame him. This isn’t a case. It’s a scam. A lie. A sham. And a disgrace, not that anything can be a disgrace in a system so free of any moral or ethical considerations.

I would explain what the case is about legally if it was really about anything legally. I don’t actually understand the theory because there really isn’t one. They don’t need one because, as I said, this isn’t a legal matter. The Soros district attorney, who ran on a platform of finding something, anything, to prosecute Donald Trump for, hasn’t bothered to make it clear either. Why should he? The Democrat-donating judge, who should’ve recused himself based on his own manifest political bias and his daughter’s as well – she’s a Democrat operative — won’t insist that the DA do so. This judge seems focused on ensuring a conviction. He should have dismissed this case. Yeah, we hear a lot about Our Democracy and the Rule of Law, but it’s all a lie. You need to understand that. 

The whole idea is to give Joe Biden the opportunity to call Donald Trump a convicted felon, so it’s the problem for them that no one actually believes it’s a real conviction. They know the verdict will eventually be thrown out on appeal by some court at some level that will do its job, as opposed to fluffing Democrat fantasies about imprisoning their political opponents. All they want is to get that conviction before the election. The actual law stuff? That doesn’t matter. It never did.

What’s glorious about it is how it doesn’t seem to be working. Everybody sees what’s going on here. That’s why nobody cares what this judge and jury decree. Conviction schmiviction, all about the Trump Train.

Other people have taken the case seriously enough to try to figure it out and explain what the theory is. Andrew McCarthy’s writings have been notably good on it, and he is certainly no fan of Donald Trump. Apparently, the legal theory is that Trump falsified business records. However, he didn’t actually do any of the falsification. The records weren’t actually false, and it’s all past the statute of limitations. Maybe this was to somehow obscure a campaign contribution in violation of federal law election law, except it wasn’t in violation of federal election law and the Manhattan DA can’t prosecute federal election law anyway, and why even bother going on? The case is nonsense. It’s a joke. No one else has ever been prosecuted for something like this. No one would ever expect to be prosecuted for something like this. If you’re not aware that what you’re doing is a crime – especially when what you’re doing is not a crime – then you shouldn’t be charged with it. But that kind of fussiness gets in the way of prosecuting your political enemies.

Again, please tell me more about Our Democracy and the Rule of Law, and how Donald Trump is a threat to them. I could use a laugh.

No, this isn’t like any case I’ve been involved in 30 years of lawyering. I’ve never seen a Democrat conspiracy so transparently corrupt and intent on framing a Republican since the last transparently corrupt Democrat conspiracy tried to frame a Republican. One witness is a woman who has sex for money and has almost as many different stories as erotic partners. Another witness is a convicted perjurer. Both have publicly announced that they’ll do anything they can to harm the guy they are testifying against. It won’t matter – the fix is in, and the jury is all Democrat. It’s really hard to explain how bad this is to a non-lawyer, especially one who gets his news from the regime media, which is collectively too stupid to understand the legal aspects of this even if it was inclined to expose the scheme for the travesty it is.

We’re all supposed to care and imagine that Trump actually committed a crime. We’re all supposed to be up in arms. Oh my gosh, Donald Trump is a felon! Everybody pretend this means something. Everybody pretend this is on the up and up. Everyone pretend this is on the level. But the polls show that people are done pretending. They see this for what it is – part of a pattern of deceit. People have been so repeatedly lied to by garbage institutions that nothing anyone tells them is going to break through and change what they think. We’ve had decades of lies, from the lies about Iraq to the Wall Street meltdown where nobody ever got prosecuted to Covid to Russia to Joe Biden just a week ago doing a 180 after promising to have Israel’s back and then sticking a knife into it. Everything is a lie. Everything is a scam, and why wouldn’t this be too? Think about what that says about how normal people look at their society’s governing institutions. 

Trump will be a convicted felon – it’s almost certain because they’ve managed to pick a jury that’s going to convict Trump of anything put in front of it by selecting the jury from 87% Democrat Manhattan. You might get one guy holding out and have a hung jury - insert Stormy Daniel joke here – but don’t bet on it. The kind of strength you need to tell the eleven Democrat schmucks on your panel to go pound sound because you won’t participate in a kangaroo court is more than we can expect from most people, though I’d love to be pleasantly surprised. 

Some appellate court will eventually toss this nonsense out, but until then the institutions will try to leverage whatever residual default assumption of legitimacy they still have to make normal people think this is legit. But there’s not much residual legitimacy left. The institutions are corrupt and ruined, dominated by leftists and the woke, and we don’t believe anything they tell us. Trump’s poll numbers may even go up after he’s convicted. What does that say about Americans? Does it say that we tolerate corruption? No, it says that we recognize it, that we understand it, and that we’re not going to be suckers. The people ruining this country will scream that the fault lies with those who notice that ruin. Well, we’re noticing.

Donald Trump’s imminent conviction is not going to change anything. The polls may flutter for a moment, but Trump will come back stronger than ever. And he should because voting for Donald Trump is the only way to repudiate what’s going on now. Sitting on the sidelines tut-tutting at the fallen state of our society is not enough. It is insufficient to be aware of what’s happening. You must be actively based. You must actively support Donald Trump, and his imminent bogus felony conviction should be one of the biggest reasons you do.

🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share memes, cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 

man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 

You Have Heard of 'Never Trumpers' - Meet The 'Never Bidens'

Becky Noble reporting for RedState 

Trump supporters, for the most part, have always been amused at the antics of those who have been deemed the "Never Trumpers." They tend to populate all of the mainstream media talking head news shows, primarily because they are allegedly Republicans willing to trash other Republicans, but they decry any Donald Trump presidency or those who support him. They long for the days of John Boehner, Paul Ryan, Liz Cheney, and soon, Mitt Romney. The days when Republicans didn't rock the boat and were willing to "lose with dignity." Well, move over, Never-Trumpers; there are new kids on the block. Meet the "Never-Bidens."

Joe Biden is making friends fast. Ok, not really. In fact, it's just the opposite. In addition to a recent New York Times/Siena College/Philadelphia Enquirer poll that shows he is losing key Democrat voter demographics like black and Hispanic voters and young people, he is also losing some heavy hitters in the arena of big money donors. One of the main reasons is Biden's recent statement that he would halt any arms shipments to Israel. Biden has since backtracked on that statement, but the damage may have already been done.

Cliff Asness is the co-founder of AQR Capital Management and a Republican donor. He contributed roughly seven figures to Nikki Haley's campaign and could have well been considered a "Never-Trumper." Based on Biden's initial arms to Israel statement, that is changing. He stated:

“Biden is a huge disappointment, really a moral outrage with this arms embargo being only the latest and greatest outrage. Despite my long opposition to him, this makes me more likely, though I haven’t quite gotten there yet, to see Trump as the better of two bad alternatives.”

Bill Ackman is a name you might have heard recently. Ackman is a Harvard alumnus and was instrumental in the ousting of Claudine Gay as president of Harvard because of Gay's plagiarizing other's work. After Biden's comments, he tweeted, “one of the worst acts against an ally of a sitting president ever. Hopefully, this means he won’t be sitting for longer.” Ackman now considers himself a "centrist" and “will vote for and support whoever is best for our country regardless of their party affiliation.” That just might be Donald Trump.

Michael Granoff is a managing partner in Maniv, a venture fund committed to clean transportation technology. He voted for Joe Biden in 2020, but the only vote he will give him in 2024 is one of no confidence. He said, “I am not voting for Biden. I’m not saying I’m voting for Trump, but it’s a nonzero chance now.” Granoff feels that Biden did a flip-flop on the commitments he made regarding Israel after the October 7 Hamas. He added: 

“The speech he gave on October 11 was one of the finest speeches a president has ever made. Had he stuck to that policy, he would be leading in the race right now. I would be raising money for him.”

The "Never-Biden" movement may have been brewing for quite a while, as far back as the State of the Union speech in early March. In the speech, Biden rattled off casualty figures from the Gaza Ministry of Health, which is run by Hamas. The incomplete data provided did not distinguish between dead civilians and dead combatants. While not a "Never-Biden" himself, former Trump Ambassador to Israel David Freidman says he definitely sees a trend in Jewish donors leaning toward Trump. He stated:

“I think the announcement (Biden's initial arms to Israel statement) on Wednesday, was the last straw for people who were already leaning very close to going for Trump. There is clearly a change going on, people who are active in politics with big money, people who were never Trumpers or reluctant ‘hold your nose Trumpers’ are telling me that Trump has to win.” 

It's a balancing act that Joe Biden is clearly losing. He is trying to placate the pro-Hamas wing of the Democrat Party — the Rashida Tlaibs and the Ilhan Omars — while trying to maintain the Jewish vote, which has long been a reliable Democrat voting bloc. In the process, he is making everyone angry, including the folks with the money. 

Whether Democrats like it or not, Joe Biden's treatment of Israel is an election issue for those on both sides of the conflict. Billionaire entertainment mogul Haim Saban is a major Democrat donor. He may have said it best in a recent email to two senior White House advisors, “Let’s not forget that there are more Jewish voters who care about Israel than Muslim voters that care about Hamas.” Which side will Joe Biden choose?

Biden Aides Lament the 'Psychological Torment' the President Is Suffering

Bonchie reporting for RedState 

Joe Biden's handlers are worried about him suffering "psychological torment." That's the story after several staffers told Politico that his mental health may be at risk if his son ends up in prison. 

Hunter Biden is currently set to stand trial on June 3rd in Delaware on gun charges. He's also set to face a federal jury over tax evasion sometime after that. The president's son faced a final setback in early May after a judge denied his appeal to delay the proceedings in Delaware.

This has apparently left Biden distraught and angry, with staffers avoiding the subject for fear of beratement.

While aides insist that the White House will have no involvement in the case, brought by special counsel David Weiss, some fear it could dramatically impact the president himself, more psychologically than politically.

Three advisers granted anonymity to speak about private deliberations said they, and members of the First Family, are worried about the weight Hunter Biden’s trial will place on the president at an already difficult time for him politically. Biden has expressed fears to them about the possibility that his son will serve time in prison.

“He worries about Hunter every single day, from the moment he wakes up to the moment he goes to sleep,” said one of the three advisers. “That will only pick up during a trial.”

On the one hand, I suppose I understand how a father would worry about his son, even if his son is a corrupt scumbag who allegedly abused women. On the other hand, no one is forcing Joe Biden to be president. If this is all too much to bear, and it seems to be, then he's welcome to retire with the multi-millions he made being a career politician to one of his multiple mansions. 

Am I supposed to feel empathy for the president's situation despite much of it being self-inflicted by his repeated coddling of and excuse-making for a son who needed tough love long before he committed federal crimes? This idea that there's no other option but for the president to suffer in silence underneath the weight of his office is nonsense. Joe Biden is welcome to go to Rehoboth Beach full-time if he'd like. He could even attend Hunter Biden's trial to show his support. 

Does this sound like a guy who is up for his current job?

But there is a gingerness among the president’s team about how to approach the matter. With few exceptions, White House aides don’t bring up the subject of Hunter Biden with the president, for fear of an angry rebuke or an icy stare, according to two of those people familiar with the president’s reactions. All spoke only on condition of anonymity to describe the personal elements of the presidency.

Given Joe Biden's past struggles with anger, it's not a surprise that his staff are terrified to bring up the subject. You would think a president who is currently losing his reelection campaign would understand the need to have a coherent political strategy. If he's so psychologically broken, then he has no business being president. The results so far speak for themselves.

At the end of the day, Hunter Biden deserves to go to prison. If that's too much stress for Joe Biden, then he should step aside. What shouldn't be expected is for anyone to feel sorry for either of them.

Urgent message and call to action - WHO will control Canada & The USA ?

 

Canadian politicians are about to sign over all authority of Canadians to outside interests, within the WHO (The World Health Organization Corporation) through The Pandemic Treaty and The Amendments to The International Health Regulations (IHRa). The IHRa process of signing over our rights to an unelected third party corporation is scheduled to occur very soon, between May 24th and June 2nd.

https://drtrozzi.substack.com/p/urgent-message-and-call-to-action?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1972999&post_id=144486025&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=rxxt5&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

What Danger Does This Pose?

The WHO corporation will be given the power to unilaterally declare emergencies worldwide (including in Canada), which would trigger its complete authority over Canadians, up to and including full access to their financial assets/savings to remedy said emergency. 

These emergency declarations can be established without confirmatory evidence and are not open for debate, discussion or delay. Schooling, medicine, financial assets of the citizens, the ability to work and earn a living, travel and even what Canadians are permitted to think about or say on social media.......will be either turned off or on at the whim of the unelected WHO. 

The WHO corporation has been right about very little so far and it appears that other nefarious agendas are indeed being played out, under the guise of health, by this unelected group of business people.....who have a very long list of human rights violations and an even longer list of accusations involving crimes against humanity.

What Can Canadians Do?

Canadians need to write to their members of federal Parliament, provincial Parliament and all members of their local councils...in order to express their anger that a foreign unelected quasi-criminal corporation will bypass all aspects of human rights and freedoms within Canada. 

Canadians must send emails to as many of their elected officials as possible and say that they do not consent to this illegal political takeover of Canadians, by The WHO corporation. 

Canadians need to pledge and promise in these emails that they will never comply with such an illegal obfuscation of our governmental process here in Canada and will certainly not condone the seizure of Canadians rights, property and registered assets to remedy unilateral emergency declarations by this unelected quai-criminal organization.

Dr. David Martin explains the IHR and Pandemic Treaty issues in just 3 minutes

Friends beware:  this WHO grab for the power to suspend  human rights applies to all nations including the Canadian Constitution and The Canadian Charter of Human Rights and Freedom.

PLEASE REFER TO THE LINK ABOVE AS I'M UNABLE TO COPY THE VIDEO

And this video message to be sent to the WHO :

https://hugh.cdn.rumble.cloud/video/fw/s8/2/5/b/o/C/5boCr.gaa.mp4

Rejecting Monopoly Power Over Global Public Health

A complete policy brief regarding  the proposed IHR amendments and WHO pandemic treaty. This is especially useful for relevant politicians who need to know the details and way forward. Click here. 

The World Council For Health

We are a grass roots global organization at the front line of the war for your health, freedom, and survival.  Please support our mission, subscribe to our newsletter, and benefit from the wealth of resources to improve your health and security. 

Dr Meryl Nass MD internal medicine specialist and biological warfare epidemiologist explains the imminent WHO threat

OK 

There are multiple videos covering some issues  Please go to the link to view all.

Ross Vaughan