Wednesday, May 8, 2024

Unrepresentative Government

Today, the political class is profoundly out of touch.


We are in the midst of a presidential campaign year. It’s supposed to be the Super Bowl for political junkies like me. But it feels strange and muted, and, so far, its vibe is uncomfortably similar to 2020.

The 2020 election was strange because of COVID, which became a pretext to change the rules in order to rig the outcome. This time, there is no such excuse for a “basement campaign.” It’s true that Biden is old, feeble, and unpopular. And Trump has been sidelined, quite deliberately, by a malicious New York judge who won’t allow him to travel and conduct his signature rallies. The problem, however, now infects all electoral politics.

There used to be rituals common to all political campaigns, but you don’t see them much anymore. This included multiple events taking place every day, announced in advance, and open to the media and the public.

Pizzerias, diners, churches, factories, local party meetings, parades, town halls, and clubs would frequently feature a visit and short speech by one candidate or another. You see aspects of this in the Iowa and New Hampshire primaries and sometimes in local races, but lately it is rare to see them in presidential and congressional campaigns.

Kabuki Theater Political Campaigning

Biden’s recent visit to Tampa got me thinking about this. There were news stories announcing his visit in advance, but it was impossible to find out where it was. The media did not even acknowledge its own silence, taking it for granted that members of the public should not get to hear the president speak.

When Biden arrived at the local community college campus—a location announced at the last possible movement—he met with hand-picked local party functionaries, and he gave a rather extreme speech that praised abortion as if it were the Eighth Sacrament.

Wherever he goes, Biden almost never mixes with regular people. He’s quite unlike Trump or Bill Clinton for that matter, who both enjoyed mixing it up with regular folks. There’s no doubt that if he did things the old way, many of these regular folks would heckle or at least not show a lot of respect for President Biden. But prior presidential candidates had to deal with this risk, and many turned these scenes into assets through charm and thick skin.

The media praised Biden’s common touch and empathy, but his campaign managers seem positively terrified of him interacting with the public or the press in anything but the most choreographed fashion.

Public Ignored On Policy

The disregard for the public also extends to policy. There’s always been a gap between politicians’ priorities and those of the public, what voters are promised and what they ultimately get, but the government has never been quite this out-of-touch and indifferent to public opinion.

People on both sides of the political divide have been complaining about rampant inflation and the porous southern border for months. Instead of dealing with these things, our new GOP speaker got together with the Democrats to hand over American military equipment and tens of billions of dollars in borrowed money to Ukraine and Israel. The GOP Speaker promised this would only happen if the bill first secured funding for border security, but then he just backed down.

This is not the only way the parties are going in directions that concern only small factions of their coalitions. The congressional Republicans’ response to protests against Israel’s campaign in Gaza was to run roughshod over the First Amendment.

The recently passed anti-Semitism bill is obscene and vandalizes one of the most cherished American rights. It also shows an utter disconnect from the GOP’s earlier expressed concerns about censorship of the handful of conservatives on campus. Everyone who voted for this law should be embarrassed at this unconstitutional law’s sycophancy to the donor class.

Other deficiencies in self-government are afoot and do not get enough attention. Trump is being persecuted with multiple completely absurd criminal prosecutions. These cases are being pursued through state court prosecutions in unfriendly venues, like Atlanta, Georgia, and New York City. He is also facing an even more sinister federal case, which threatens to place a cloud over every future president’s exercise of authority since post-election prosecutions will always be on the table. These attempts to kneecap the presumptive nominee of the Republican Party supposedly protect Our Democracy™.

There really is a uniparty, and it is very evident on matters like spending, foreign policy, tax policy, civil liberties, and the treatment of outsiders. Elected politicians don’t have control, so that means neither do the American people. The bureaucrats, of course, have some power, though theirs resides mostly in the form of a de facto veto of policy measures they do not like through slow-walking and other machinations.

The big donors are the real shot callers: the super wealthy, most of whom are concerned with maintaining their wealth but also with advancing their own, elite-skewed ideological views. Politicians who do their bidding get a cut, both directly in the form of PAC donations but also indirectly in the form of stock tips, insider knowledge of complex markets, intelligence on companies that will benefit from pending laws and regulations, and the like.

Thus, the number one priority of the political class is preserving the status quo in governance and preserving the wealth of the donor class, a portion of which flows to the politicians as a reward. Noticing and responding to public sentiment, setting conditions for the prosperity of the majority, or otherwise acting in the long-term interest of the country are largely irrelevant.

A Blind Ruling Class

Most of the political rituals of yesteryear, such as the debates and the in-person gladhanding with voters, led to the incorporation of public opinion into a politician’s knowledge of the world. Today, the political class is profoundly out of touch, often consisting of characters like Joe Biden, who is completely dependent on his handlers, and House Speaker Mike Johnson, who never had many dealings with the private sector other than as a source of donations. He was an activist, then a state representative, and then ran for an empty seat in Congress.

We call our system either a democracy or a republic, but oligarchy is a better descriptor for its present state. That is to say, we live in a world where a handful of companies own assets in excess of the GDP of entire countries; their owners make enormous political donations and also have control over media, finance, and other critical sectors of the economy, easily cajoling politicians to do their bidding.

Politics naturally reflects the character of a society and its various power centers. We were once a middle class country with more widely distributed wealth. This was widely considered an important foundation for republican self-government.

Maintaining and extending such conditions does not currently seem to be a priority for either party. You barely hear about taxes, inequality, safety nets, health care, the manufacturing sector, the stock market, good-paying jobs, trade policy, or much else that affects people’s day-to-day lives.

Republicans sometimes pounce on inflation, which has been bad and persistent. Yet neither party has a comprehensive agenda focused on cutting government spending or raising the collective welfare of the country. One notable exception was the economic nationalism that formed the centerpiece of Trump’s original agenda.

Symbolic issues—abortion, transsexuals, the supposed terrors of January 6, and the like—tend to suck all of the oxygen out of the room. Focusing on these issues, particularly when there is little likelihood of resolution, permits politicians in both parties to serve the interests of the billionaire oligarchs in the donor class while pretending to fight for the public.

This unaccountable and irresponsible system will continue if voters on both sides remain loyal to their parties and neglect to retaliate for “rug pulls.” It should have been obvious that the current GOP speaker would be a fink. Nothing about him screamed character, perseverance, or solidarity with the people, but here we are. Similarly, it should have been obvious to the economic left, which rallied for Bernie Sanders in the 2016 primary, that Biden would do nothing for them either. This all persists because we allow it and because of the unknown and under-investigated ways elections and political outcomes are rigged.

There was a heartwarming moment during a recent campus Israel protest. At protests at the University of Alabama, both the pro-Palestine and pro-Israel cohorts began alternately shouting at one another the common and vulgar crystallization of public opinion: F—K Joe Biden. While he did promise to unite us, he probably did not mean to do it like that.

It was a good reminder that there is a lot of dissatisfaction on both sides with the indifference and lack of accountability in the system. Thus, there is strong support for an outsider candidate and dissident politics among voters in both parties. Two groups of young people are condemning the sitting president. This is what happens when a fraudulent, donor-dependent oligarchic system masquerades as a responsive and democratic one.



And we Know, On the Fringe, and more- May 8

 




Thoughts on the Protest Industrial Complex


Who can forget the wise words of President Eisenhower:

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the protest-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

Alas, it is the way of humans to forget the wise words of their ancestors.

But how did this happen? How did our society get captured by a brutal and oppressive protest industrial complex? Ernest Hemingway knew: “How did you go woke? Two ways. Gradually, then suddenly.”

I blame Johannes Gutenberg and his printing press. It was the flooding of Europe with cheap books replacing expensive parchment scrolls that prompted the rise of the educated class and led to the Age of Revolution. But then what? What happened after the educated class came to power in the 19th century?

The answer comes from Gaetano Mosca, member of the Italian school of elitism, and his book The Ruling Class. Ruling classes do not rule by power alone, he wrote, but invent a moral or legal basis for their power. Mosca called this a “political formula.”

Rulers never say: “I’m in it for me; get used to it, peasant.” Oh no. They are always serving the people, or the nation.

Our present rulers justify their power with their advocacy for marginalized communities and their benign support of movements of the oppressed demonstrating for justice.

But when did it start? With Babeuf, after the French Revolution? Saint-Simon, advocating for the needs of the industrial class? Fourier and his PhalanstΓ¨res? Marx and his communism that would stop the “immiseration” of the workers?

Never mind: by the end of the 19th century all the right people were agreed that the way to raise up the workers was by pulling down the robber barons.

However, a curious thing happened on the way to the just society. In the cities of the United States, social scientists like William M. Tweed discovered that the lower class identified not so much by class as by race and national origin. So the educated class adapted its class ideology into an ethnic ideology.

That worked like gangbusters when it was time for the Democrats to dump the Southern white trash and fight for black civil rights and smash the racist regime of Jim Crow.

But now I have to tell you a sad story. At some point in the aftermath of the movement for black civil rights, the mass movement of educated people fulfilled Eric Hoffer’s prophecy and became a racket.

Welcome to the Age of the Fake Victim, where the victims hail not from the suffering lower classes, but from the tippy-top educated class.

Seriously, can you blame our liberal friends? After a century and more of helping up the helpless, it was time to deal a few cards to themselves.

So our feminist friends, particularly educated-class women, decided they were victims. But I say they never were.

Likewise, gays have only experienced modest victimhood. Pride.com mentionsthe following gay Hollywood actors: Marlene Dietrich, Cesar Romero, Greta Garbo, Cary Grant, Joan Crawford, Rock Hudson, Tallulah Bankhead, etc. Wow, imagine how they suffered!

And transgenders? The only people suffering on the transgender front seem to be women: on the sports field, in the public restroom, and J.K. Rowling.

When you think about it, it makes complete sense. Of course, our liberal friends would eventually decide that they were the real victims!

But the really delicious thing about fighting for the victims is you get to make like a rioter.

All down the ages, we are assured, helpless victims, faced with utter destitution, were forced to riot in the streets. The Jacquerie, the Fronde, The VendΓ©e, The Luddites, the Swing riots, the Whiskey rebellion. What fun they had! Why shouldn’t lefty students get in on the action!

Back in the day, upper-class youth put on fancy uniforms and flourished sabers and came home as war heroes. Why shouldn’t today’s tippy-top youth at least wear fashionable keffiyeh scarves just like genuine freedom fighters!

Of course, experts agree, all such protests are completely different than the January 6 armed insurrection, a day that will live in infamy.

The last time we had genuine protests for genuine victims was the civil rights era. And I am sure that those Freedom Rider activists had no interest in teaching southern white trash a lesson.

I feel a certain compassion for today’s tippy-top elite students. All their lives they have been carefully taught that the only way to live a meaningful life is as an Ally of the Oppressed against the White Oppressors -- or white racists, or imperialists, or settler-colonialists, or however the fashion changes. So what else can they do?

Last week, it seemed that America’s frat boys had had it with the keffiyeh fashion show. I wonder who wins in the battle of Fratties vs. Wokies?



🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓


Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share memes, cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


John Kirby Says Israel Can’t Eliminate An Ideology With Force. History Disagrees



In the 12th century, the Christian dualist movement Catharism began spreading across northern Italy and southern France. It was neither the first nor the last heretical challenge to orthodox Christianity in medieval Europe — as Catholics can surely attest.

In any event, the Cathars essentially believed, among many other heresies, in two gods: one of eternal heaven and another of worldly evil. The belief became so popular that Pope Innocent III, apparently not a fan of religious liberty, was compelled to launch the Albigensian Crusade to stamp out this theological perversion. Hundreds of thousands likely perished. In one French Cathar city, 20,000 people were reported slaughtered under papal legate.

I thought of the Cathars, as one does, when Kirby responded to a question about the United States’ support for Israel’s goal of eliminating Hamas with his popular trope — “You’re not going to eliminate an ideology through military operations.” Unlike the Albigensian Crusaders, of course, Israel is taking unprecedented precautions to protect the civilian life of their enemies — even though Hamas, unlike medieval Christians, hides behind them.

The worst part of Kirby’s platitudinous nonsense, however, is that it creates the impression Israel is trying to eliminate an entire “ideology” rather than trying to eradicate an organized military and cultural force that uses theology for violent political aims. Of course Israel can’t bore into the souls of Gazans and transform them into right-thinking people. It can destroy Hamas’ hold on territory and render its ideology largely useless. It can bring the purveyors of Hamas ideology to justice and eradicate their military capabilities. For now, that’s good enough.

Moreover, if fighting wars to defend enlightened ideas against nefarious ones is really such a waste of time, why are we sending hundreds of billions to Ukraine to fight Putinst aggression? We are incessantly assured that the European war is a battle between “autocracy” and “democracy.” These are ideological camps. If Volodymyr Zelensky could strike a debilitating blow to Putin’s political power, would Kirby contend it was a waste of time?

Why did we fight any wars, for that matter? Why did we fight al-Qaida? Surely there were Tories left in the United States after the Revolutionary War and fans of slavery left after the Civil War. There were plenty of Nazis around after World War II. (There are plenty today.) The good news was that their leaders either committed gruesome suicides, were brought to justice, or were forced to hide in the jungles of South America where they worried that Mossad agents would show up and drag them to Israel to stand trial for their crimes. Most German civilians, even one-time fervent Nazis, made their peace with reality and moved on.

One hopes that when Hamas is obliterated in Gaza, despite Kirby’s objections, its leaders now living it up in Qatari resorts will also wonder if they will meet their ends by accidentally falling out a 20th-story window. And one hopes that the Palestinians, like the Germans and Japanese, will finally come to terms with reality and build better lives.



Stop Caring


It’s become clear that America has a problem with caring. Americans care far too much. They need to care less about things that are pinko ruling class deems important. They need to actively not care.

Why limit our caring? Because caring gives your enemies leverage over you. Your enemies don’t care about you. Do you think those fat, ugly communists infesting our college campuses care about you? They don’t, except to the extent they can hurt you. When they talk about “From the River to the Sea,” they’re not just talking about the Jordan to the Med – they’re talking about the Mississippi to the Pacific and the Atlantic, or they would if they knew any geography. 

They don’t care about you. They want you dead. Their problem is they have no upper body strength and no guns. They can’t make you die or do anything else. The only way they can exercise power over you is by convincing you to exercise power over yourself.

That’s where your caring comes in. They use caring as leverage against you. It’s weaponized caring. They can’t do anything at all unless you care what they say and what they think and act accordingly. If you stop caring, you start winning.

Now, I’m not saying all caring is bad. You should care about your family, not in a Joe Biden way, but in a normal daddyshower-free way. You should care about your dogs, but not in a Kristi Noem way. The Bible instructs us to care about others. Look at the Good Samaritan story (Luke 10: 29-37). Note that the Samaritan story took place in ancient Israel, kind of establishing the whole Jewish indigenous thing, but that’s not the point here. The point is that Jesussays you should care about innocent people in need of help. The Samaritan came across a man who had been beaten and robbed, except on the road from Jerusalem to Jericho and not a modern blue Democrat city. The Samaritan helped him out. The victim didn’t do anything wrong. He didn’t ask for it. He suffered misfortune. It’s a good thing to care about people like that.

But it’s a bad thing to care too much about people who cause their own problems because that deprives them of the educational benefit of suffering the consequences of stupid decisions. And it’s also bad to care about people who use caring to beat your brains out. 

We all have a limited caring bandwidth. We can’t care about everything, which the left understands and uses against us. We’re supposed to care about the things the commies care about. We’re supposed to care about Gazans who are getting killed because Gazans started a war instead of Nigerians who were getting killed because they are Christians. Allowing the enemy to determine your hierarchy of caring allows them to set your agenda. Don’t allow them to do that.

A proper hierarchy of caring has God, Country, and Family right at the top. You should care about those things and care a lot. But after that, you have to make choices about what you will care about. Here are mine. Next in the hierarchy of caring come American civilians, and then come American soldiers and first responders. Why are these heroes second? Well, because they – and I – took an oath that does not expire to uphold the Constitution, meaning putting American citizens’ lives ahead of our own. So, if I have a choice between an American citizen and an American soldier taking a bullet, it’s got to be the soldier. That’s when we earn all that “Thank you for your service” stuff. But still, their pace in my hierarchy of caring still means a heck of a lot of caring. 

Next come allied civilians—that’s because they are allies. Then come allied soldiers and first responders. After that come other civilians. Then come enemy civilians—yes, I care less about the lives of enemy civilians than I do about American and Allied civilians and soldiers. You have correctly assessed my relative levels of caring. I know it will stun moral illiterates that I will take my own side in a conflict, but I do.

And after that comesnothing. I don’t care about enemy combatants – the Hamas semihumans do not deserve the title “soldiers.” Not a bit. I actively want bad things to happen to them.

So, if somebody asks me why I don’t care enough about the Gazan people who are suffering because of the war the Gazans started, that’s because, as enemy civilians, they are near the bottom of my hierarchy of caring. How do I know they are our enemy? I listen to them.

It’s unreasonable to expect me to care much about the enemy, not simply because they are the enemy but because one can only care so much. Again, you only have so much caring bandwidth. You can’t care about everything, and you certainly can’t care about everything equally. Adults distinguish between things. The left distinguishes between things. My life and yours are right at the bottom of their hierarchy of caring. The leftists don’t care if we think that’s wrong. Why should we care what they think?

And here’s another rule of caring – I can’t care more about strangers than the people who have a duty to care about them do. Let’s take the Gazans again, please. Gazan children are getting hurt in a war that their parents and tribe started and still perpetuate by not surrendering and giving up their hostages, yet I’m expected to care a lotabout them. But why am I expected to care about them more than their parents and their tribe do? If they cared, they would surrender, release the hostages, and better yet, have never started this war in the first place. A parent’s duty is to care about his own children. I’m not sure how anyone really expects me to care about somebody else’s children more than the children’s parents do, but I’m not going to. And no amount of moral intimidation is going to make me. 

The fact is that the Gazans brought on their own pain, and their problem is their problem, not mine. Even if I could do something about it, other than end it sooner by encouraging Israel to get on with it and wipe out these Hamas bastards, it is not my moral duty to do so. I didn’t create the problem. I don’t control the solution, or at least one that’s acceptable to me. I suppose we could cut Israel off from arms and allow the Gazans to murder them all, but that’s not going to happen. So, I guess the Gazans are screwed until they decide to change how they do business. If they don’t care enough about their own fate to do that, I don’t see why I’m required to compensate by caring much more about their fate than they do. And I don’t.

Your caring is yours. You get to decide what you care about, not some bloated pierced freak working out their daddy issues on the campus quad. And if they don’t like that, guess what? I don’t care.



Biden’s Missed Opportunity

 https://www.commentary.org/seth-mandel/bidens-missed-opportunity/


Biden’s Missed Opportunity

President Biden spoke late this morning at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum on anti-Semitism, and while he missed the opportunity to deliver a still-needed rebuke to his own party, Biden did manage to avoid repeating the two biggest mistakes he’s made on this issue: the false equivalence and the “legitimate grievance” trap.

Last month, for example, he demonstrated both blunders in the same answer to a question about the anti-Semitic protesters at various U.S. college campuses: “I condemn the anti-semitic protests… I also condemn those who don’t understand what’s going on with the Palestinians.”

There, in one breath, the president gave equivalent condemnation of those committing anti-Jewish violence and those who lack sufficient empathy for the violent anti-Semitic protesters. Underlying it all is the idea that the protesters have a legitimate grievance with their victims.

It was the closest the president has come to his own “there are very fine people on both sides” moment.

Fact is, Jews are being openly harassed in the U.S. as retribution for something the protesters are falsely accusing the state of Israel of doing thousands of miles away. That’s it—that’s the whole scene. There is, in other words, no possible justification for the actions of these pro-Hamas extremists. There is no “both sides.”

Similarly, we all know exactly what Gaza has to do with the guy who threw a bottle at a Jewish man’s head at the Columbia gates and told him to “go back to Poland”: Nothing at all.

The examples go on for days, but the point is clear: Anti-Semitic violence as a response to the war in Gaza is indefensible on any level. Linking the two as some sort of cause-effect equation is nothing less than making anti-Semites’ arguments for them.

To his credit, this morning the president did not suggest otherwise. “I understand people have strong beliefs and deep convictions about the world. In America, we respect and protect the fundamental right to free speech, to debate and disagree, to protest peacefully, and make our voices heard. I understand, that’s America. But there is no place on any campus in America, any place in America, for anti-Semitism or hate speech or threats of violence of any kind.”

It is crucial, in fact, in these situations to be dismissive of the protesters’ concerns. They have no bearing on today’s topic of Jew-hatred in the long shadow of the Shoah. An address on anti-Semitism in honor of Holocaust Memorial Day (or week; the day of observance was yesterday) is not a speech on geopolitics at the Council on Foreign Relations. Joe Biden’s genuine sympathy for the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza is, also, irrelevant to his responsibility to properly communicate the lessons of the Holocaust.

And so it was a relief that Biden ignored the ongoing prosecution of the war without ignoring the war itself. Indeed, he correctly connected Hamas’s instigation of this war to the Holocaust itself. “This ancient hatred of Jews didn’t begin with the Holocaust, and didn’t end with the Holocaust either, or even after our victory in World War II… That hatred was brought to life on October 7, 2023.”

The president expressed his outrage over Jews who feel they must hide their yarmulke under a baseball cap or their star of David pendant beneath their shirt. There is a war on open Jewish expression right here in the United States. It routinely takes violent forms. And it is currently being driven primarily by members of Biden’s party and political coalition, some of whom are members of the United States Congress.

And that is the one place the speech fell shy of its mark. Ilhan Omar visited the “tentifada” like a celebrity and suggested the Jews on campus who didn’t join the protests calling for the destruction of the Jewish state were “pro-genocide.” Bernie Sanders spends most of his time falsely accusing Israel of “deliberately starving children,” and called for the media to stop covering the anti-Semitism on campus and just cover alleged Israeli crimes instead. Elizabeth Warren and Chris Van Hollen in the Senate; Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Jamaal Bowman, Rashida Tlaib and host of others in the House—a growing number of the president’s fellow elected Democrats have an obsession with riling up crowds against the Jews.

Joe Biden was, we were told, the man for this moment because of his empathy. And there’s something to the idea that 2020 was the perfect time for a leader who had, tragically, much experience in picking up the pieces after a trauma and showing people how to put one foot in front of the other, even when it’s hard. But it’s not 2020. It’s 2024. And in 2024 the country desperately needs a leader who has no time for the self-justifications of the hate merchants in his own party, the men and women who stand next to him and smile as he signs legislation or rallies voters knowing full well he won’t read them the riot act.

We don’t need a fire chief who empathizes with fire. Just put out the flames, Mr. President.



Portland Radicals Admit Torching 17 Police Cars for Hamas


Nick Arama reporting for RedState 

I've written before about how crazy the radical left is in Portland. 

We saw a recent example of that with how they took over the library at Portland State University. What they left was disgusting: they trashed the place. They had paint all over the floors and graffiti all over the walls, they smashed glass cases, they had makeshift weapons, and there were even reports of value book/comic collections missing from the library. Then when the police raided, many of them seemed to have been allowed to just run right out the front door. After the library was cleared out, they even had the gall to come back the next day to try it again. The police did arrest about 30 people over the course of two days, noting that some of them were not students. 

One of the things that I also remarked on in that story was that on the morning before the police raid, someone torched 15 Portland police cars at a training facility. 


Portland Encampment Is Cleared Out, What the Police Found Was Disgusting


The police updated that report on Monday and said 17 cars had been torched. 

As I noted, the timing was highly suspicious considering it happened right before the raid on the PSU campus activists. 

Now a group calling itself "Rachel Corrie's Ghost Brigade" is admitting they did it to strike first at the police, believing a raid was coming. 

Also Monday, a group calling itself “Rachel Corrie’s Ghost Brigade” said people had cut through a fence at the bureau’s training facility and set 10 fires in anticipation of a police response at Portland State University’s Millar Library. [....]

“Raid them before they raid you,” the group’s post said on the website Rose City Counter-Info. The website allows people to publish posts anonymously. The website was used earlier this year by people who claimed they set a car on fire outside Portland City Commissioner Rene Gonzalez’s house.

Rachel Corrie was an American activist from Olympia, Washington, who died in 2003 while protesting the Israeli Army’s destruction of Palestinian houses in Gaza. She was crushed by an Israeli bulldozer and died.

Among the crazy things they said: 

We did it for the Haymarket Martyrs.

We did it for all the Black and Indigenous rebels murdered by slavers and settlers.

We did it for all the brutalized student protesters.

Above all we did it for the Palestinian martyrs! (and we want to remind the world that the “official” count is stuck at 35,000 martyrs because the Israelis bombed every hospital to stop accurate reporting of the dead)

Our attack was preemptive. After seeing Humboldt, Columbia, UCLA and more we knew the occupation at PSU would be swept violently and wanted to attack PPB before. [....]

4-FIGHT! Defend your camps! If the frat bros come, smash their frat house windows! If the Zionist settlers come, throw fireworks at them! If the cops come don’t just resist arrest, fight them! They will hate you and beat you if you’re peaceful or violent, and it is time to be violent.

5-Out of the quads, out of the buildings, into the streets! As the semester ends this is not over. Fight during the summer. When next year starts fight then too!

We call for more actions to avenge Palestinians and the brutalized students at PSU and beyond! Let ten million cop cars burn!

You can see by the first couple of things in their screed the connection to radical leftism and how they want to continue the thuggery, even saying "it is time to be violent" and calling for "ten million cop cars" to "burn." Haymarket refers to an 1886 violent labor riot that had bomb throwing and police killing. 

But Rachel Corrie's father disavowed these characters, saying that had wrongly appropriated his daughter's name. “I guess there’s nothing I can say to them,” Craig Corrie said. “No, it’s just wrong. They’ve co-opted Rachel’s name for use they would never, ever have approved of.”

Police said they were investigating the arson and the claim of responsibility. 



An Insane Political Lawfare Trial

 Stormy Daniels case is driven by the Biden administration in an effort to keep Trump tied up in court so he cannot campaign against the hapless Joe Biden.



https://www.nysun.com/article/an-insane-political-lawfare-trial

You may be noticing we’re not rushing to cover the downtown Trump trial and the appearance of a certain porn actress. Why? Because she has nothing to do with the charges concerning business records in furtherance of a crime yet to be defined by the Alvin Bragg prosecutors. The porn actress has nothing to do with this, nothing.

There was a non-disclosure agreement funded by President Trump’s personal money, neither of which is illegal, not the personal money, nor the non-disclosure agreement. In fact, the prosecutors haven’t even stipulated yet that Mr. Trump was connected with the payment for the non-disclosure agreement.

The sole purpose of Tuesday’s actress witness is to create a salacious story atmosphere, done deliberately to sully Mr. Trump’s reputation and bias the jury toward convicting him. Even the judge has acknowledged so-called “salacious” information shouldn’t be allowed but of course, he allowed it anyway.

Tuesday’s testimony by a certain actress should have been inadmissible as every fair and right-thinking person knows. Team Trump is asking for a mistrial and they are absolutely right. This is an insane political lawfare trial, driven by the Biden administration, and in fact, some former Biden Justice Department prosecutors are running this case.

This is nothing but 2024 election interference in an effort to keep Mr. Trump tied up in court so he cannot campaign against the hapless President Biden. None of this should have happened in the first place. Not the trial, not certainly the actress testifying. 

These are transparently evil actions orchestrated in my view by the Biden administration, from the top all the way down. Tragically these lawfare actions, this two-tiered justice system, the attempt to sully Mr. Trump, is also a damaging blow to the prestige and glory of the night of America. A blow to our freedom.

This is a sordid period of history and it reminds us all why Mr. Biden must be retired from his office. Therefore, in our little way, I choose to give no currency to Tuesday’s witness fiasco. We have other fish to fry.

From Mr. Kudlow’s broadcast on Fox Business Network.