Tuesday, April 2, 2024

A GOP Landslide in November


It’s there for the taking. A Republican overwhelming victory across the board, taking back the White House and securing huge majorities in both houses of Congress, is attainable if the election is more about “Biden Democrats” and their policies and less about Donald Trump.

The Biden administration has imposed disastrous policies on the country. Polls show that 60% of voters are ready to boot Joe Biden out of the White House. But what happens if the Democrats beat them to it by replacing their loser candidate? It could happen if they also figure out how to displace Kamala Harris without alienating the voters who think her race and gender qualified her to sit in the White House and possibly the Oval Office.

The GOP needs to hammer their opponents on no less than five terrible policies and identify them all as Democrat policies instead of just those of “Crooked Joe Biden.”

1. The Biden Democrats have opened the southern border to about eight million illegal aliens, many of them military-age single males. Assume only half of those aliens are males and one in a thousand are in terrorist sleeper cells infiltrated by Al-Qaeda, ISIS, or Iran. That adds up to 4,000 attackers spread all over the country, which is 200 times greater than the twenty that Al-Qaeda planned for its attack on September 11, 2001. Instead of thousands of deaths, the casualties could be hundreds of thousands. That death toll would overshadow the body blow to American cities from millions of unscreened “migrants” whom Democrat governors and mayors are subsidizing with free housing and free money. The answer from Biden Democrats to the terrorist threat is to ban the terms “Islamic terrorist” and “jihadist” from intelligence reports at the Pentagon and the FBI.

2.  In the past three years the Biden administration has shown itself to be a faithless ally to our friends and a toothless foe against our enemies. First there was the disastrous retreat from Afghanistan, the worst humiliation of the American military in almost 50 years. It is doing it again in the Middle East. After its horrendous attack on October 7, 2023 on Israel, Hamas promised repeated attacks until they “killed all the Jews.” They are proving to be the 21st- century heirs to the Nazis. The United Nations Security Council passed a resolution to save Hamas from Israel’s counterattack. Instead of vetoing that resolution, the Biden Administration abstained. The Biden Democrats oppose Israel’s total victory versus Hamas. Polls show that at least 60% of Americans support Israel’s war effort. Their votes are there for the taking by Republicans.

3. The Biden Democrats are coming for your children. In California and other Blue States Democrats push “gender transition” on pre-adolescent and adolescent children. Parents who object can have “child protective services” move to terminate their parental rights. This is on top of the sexually explicit books and drag queen story hours in school libraries around the country. Attacking the natural rights of parents to raise their families reminds one of Communist China during the Cultural Revolution imposed by Chairman Mao.

4. They are coming for your car and pickup truck. Energy policies imposed by executive orders and burdensome regulations are on track to ruin the American economy. In three years, Biden has driven up gasoline prices by 50%. The Democrats plan to practically eliminate the production of gas-driven automobiles in the next ten years. Ask any electrical engineer if our power grid can support all those EVs and you will get a quick “you got to be crazy” response. Any auto worker in Michigan who votes for the Democrats in November is suicidal. These are the worst economic policies since Jimmy Carter.

5. The Biden Democrats don’t respect the Constitution. Under the 14th Amendment we are entitled to equal protection of the law. Racial preferences are prohibited. The “Diversity, Equity and Inclusion” agenda, known as DEI, creates favored groups based on skin color and other arbitrary distinctions. The 2nd Amendment right to “keep and bear arms” is under attack again. Biden just announced a “federal center” to support “red flag laws.” Those laws empower bureaucrats and left-wing judges to confiscate a citizen’s firearms without notice and a court hearing. In comparison we have more legal protection against involuntary commitment for insanity. Our 1st Amendment right of freedom of speech has been diluted by a conspiracy of the Biden Democrats and social media companies who claim that there is a “misinformation” exception from the 1st Amendment.

July 4, 2026 will be the 250th anniversary of Independence Day, but November 5, 2024 is when we must vote to preserve our rights so we can celebrate in 2026.



X22, On the Fringe, and more- April 2nd

 




Tucker Carlson's Prep School Too Scared to Let Him Speak on Campus, 'People Could Be Killed'


Bob Hoge reporting for RedState 

Tucker Carlson was invited by a student to speak at his high school alma mater, the St. George’s boarding school in Middletown, RI, but he says the administration first gave him the runaround, then flat-out said he was not welcome. They issued all sorts of reasons why over the course of several phone conversations, claiming that he’d bring unwanted media attention, that the students didn’t actually want him, the faculty "hated" him, that he was “embarrassing,” and finally, that it would just be too dangerous.

Of course, the real reason they didn’t want him was because they couldn’t deal with his ideas or the thought of having their worldview challenged.

Finally, he arranged to do a Zoom call with interested students, telling them the whole episode was "wrong":

I found, honestly in my exchanges with the administration at St. George’s, a total resistance to having anybody who they don’t agree with even in the same world. Like I’m not on your campus right now because they — the campus that I went to, and donated to and sent my two children to — because they wouldn’t let me come.

He claimed the reason is simple: it's his politics.

And why wouldn’t they let me come? Well, of course, because they hate my politics. And my feeling was, well, you know, that’s wrong. 

First of all, I want to be there. I want to meet the kids. I want to see the kids. And I feel it would be good for everyone to have this happen. And I don’t want a mandatory chapel where everyone has to come and hear me; I don’t believe in that. 

I don’t want to press my views on people who don’t want to hear them.

Watch:

Ironically enough, a large headline on the school website's main page reads:

At St. George’s School, you’ll join a nurturing and collaborative community where students of all backgrounds champion and support each other.

Yeah, as long as you don’t harbor conservative ideals, evidently.

Tucker pointed out that the school's security officers don't carry firearms, a situation he called "so nuts," and that he offered his own security detail but was denied. He found the administration's dealings worthy of contempt:

I mean, like, stop lying to me. I just can’t deal with it. Why don’t you say, "We don’t like your politics. We think you’re scary. You can’t get anywhere near the campus that you went to and were married on and sent all your kids to." 

And I would be like, okay, that’s fine. But rather than just say it to me, we had to get into this whole passive aggressive lying cycle where no one can just be direct. 

And I just have total contempt for that.

The school wasn't happy with Carlson either, and they issued a letter Friday saying that campus security was a priority, state law prohibits firearms on campus, and also that Carlson violated a promise not to record the Zoom session. If true, I find it surprising that he would agree to such a stipulation because if I were in such a high-profile position, I would want everything recorded in case of a dispute or if someone attempted to twist my words.

The school also contended in the letter that they do everything they can to "encourage our students to remain open to differing views and to think for themselves" and that "in a world where civil discourse and respectful disagreements are hard to find, we strive to make St. George's a place where these conversations can happen."

In this case, their actions did not showcase those ideals, at least according to Carlson's account, and it certainly sounds like they'd do just about anything to keep Tucker—and his scary ideas—as far away from school grounds as possible.



📢 Special 1st preview of the 1000th NCISVerse episode

 


Source: https://ew.com/ncis-franchise-1000th-episode-first-look-8623505

The list of shows that have crossed the 1,000-episode milestone is largely populated by talk shows, soap operas, game shows, and reality programs. (And, of course, Sesame Street.) Especially in recent years, the list doesn't include many shows like NCIS

Nonetheless, the franchise is hitting its 1,000th episode on April 15, and Entertainment Weekly has an exclusive look at the milestone night.

The threshold will be crossed with the 464th episode of NCIS, the franchise's flagship show. The achievement counts episodes across all NCIS shows, including the original series, NCIS: Los AngelesNCIS: New OrleansNCIS: Hawai'i, and the new NCIS: Sydney. All told, it's roughly 42,722 minutes of water-adjacent investigations across the United States and, as of November, Australia as well.

NCIS 1000th Episode
Michael Weatherly and Cote de Pablo on 'NCIS' 1,000th episode. 

NCIS/YOUTUBE

The April 15 episode of NCIS, currently in its 21st season, is not-so-coyly titled "A Thousand Yards," and CBS says the episode will be rife with Easter eggs for long-time fans, including appearances from NCIS: Los Angeles' Daniela Ruah and NCIS: Hawai'i's Vanessa Lachey. The investigators will face a shadowy enemy from their past as Vance (Rocky Carroll) attempts to mend a fractured relationship with his estranged son.

The show will also drop celebratory Easter eggs on social media throughout the day.

The celebration goes beyond the April 15 broadcasts. It will include an April 8 special, NCISverse: The First 1,000, on Entertainment Tonight that will feature a behind-the-scenes look at the filming of the 1,000th episode and stars sharing their favorite NCIS moments.

Cast of NCIS at a cake-cutting event in honor of the show's 1,000th episode.
The 'NCIS' cast celebrates 1,000 episodes. 

CBS ENTERTAINMENT

Franchise stars will also pop up on other shows throughout the week. The many appearances will include Wilmer Valderrama on The Late Show With Stephen Colbert on April 10, Brian Dietzen and Diona Reasonover on The Price Is Right, and April 15 appearances on The Talk from Gary ColeSean Murray, Carroll, and Lachey.

NCIS may seem inescapable on CBS for the next two weeks as its stars pop up all over the channel. Still, this isn't likely to be the last milestone for the sprawling franchise.

CBS has already announced two new shows entering the NCISverse next season. NCIS: Origins and another show for Paramount+ that has yet to be named, but stars Cote de Pablo and Michael Weatherly, reuniting on NCIS for the first time in 10 years as their characters Ziva David and Tony DiNozzo.

NCIS airs Mondays at 9 p.m. ET on CBS. Watch the exclusive preview of the 1,000th episode above.

38 Chaplains Ask Supreme Court To Stop U.S. Military From Punishing Their Faith


The chaplains say the Department of Defense continues to defy a 2023 law rescinding its Covid vaccine mandate.



A healthy little Dutch girl without a proper name died 52 years ago. Scientists keep her kidney’s cells multiplying in a process similar to cancer. They perform increasing numbers of experiments on derivatives of this baby girl’s kidney cells to develop technologies that include taste-testing experiments for PepsiCo. Her vivisection forms “the backbone of the global gene therapy market.”

Scientists call the baby girl HEK 293. HEK stands for “human embryonic kidney,” and 293 means she was the 293rd experiment in a set.

She likely died from an elective abortion, not a miscarriage, concludes a 2006 journal article and many other scientific publications. An older gestational age and harvesting her kidney while still alive would have made her more useful for experimentation, as Planned Parenthood officials affirmed of their baby harvesting operations in 2015.

Like many medications, Covid-19 vaccines and therapeutics were tested on cells made from HEK 293’s kidney. Some of the vaccines have HEK 293 cells inside them. That’s one of several reasons Capt. Rob Nelson, an Air Force chaplain, couldn’t in good conscience accept those treatments despite massive pressure from the military, he told The Federalist in a phone interview.

“I have five [children], and it breaks my heart to think of this. This girl continues to be violated as her cells are replicated over and over again,” he said.

Nelson is one of 38 military chaplains whose petition is now before U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts in the case Alvarado v. Austin. The chaplains say the Department of Defense continues to defy the 2023 National Defense Authorization Act rescinding its Covid vaccine mandate, which the petition says has allowed statistically zero exceptions.

Eliminating People with Ethical Boundaries from the Military

The DOD continues to violate the law by failing to rescind its punishments of conscientious objectors such as denied training and deployments required for promotions, the petition says. In addition, of course, denying soldiers’ religious exercise violates the First Amendment’s guarantee that all Americans can freely exercise their faith in their everyday lives.

That is precisely why the military has chaplains, several told The Federalist. All soldiers, their families, and civilians working for the U.S. military “have a right to believe what they believe and no one can say otherwise. It’s the same reason we can’t have a religious test for federal positions. As a chaplain, my job is to make sure the free exercise of religion is allowed, that nobody infringes upon that inalienable right,” said Army Col. Brad Lewis, a chaplain also party to the suit.

Chaplains usually help determine whether soldiers receive religious accommodations for all sorts of things, from Norse pagans wearing beards to Sikhs wearing turbans and Jews eating kosher. While the military routinely approves such waivers, it told Congress it had denied essentially all religious vaccine waiver requests from soldiers who weren’t almost retired, say the plaintiffs.

“I got in with an age waiver,” Nelson noted of his military service. “They can supposedly give wavers for all kinds of things but not a religious accommodation.”

In its Supreme Court response filed March 27, the DOD claims it has removed all punishments from soldiers imposed “solely” for conscientious objections to vaccines. It claims removing career penalties that arise from banning conscientious objectors from career-promoting training and duties has no “lawful basis.” The DOD also says that because the vaccination requirement has ended, the case is moot.

“By denying religious exemptions, what the military has done is set about the removal of people who are willing to stand on conviction,” Lewis said. He and Nelson noted this dynamic is especially dangerous if cultivated among soldiers, whose job is to kill.

Deployed To Defend Freedoms the Military Denies Him

Lewis has dedicated more than 30 years of his life to the U.S. military, including 47 months of deployment. He’s taken seven deployments to Afghanistan, six to Iraq, and an entire year away from his wife and four children in South Korea. He’s a fourth-generation Assemblies of God pastor whose father also served in the U.S. military during the Cold War.

Lewis was the senior chaplain on Hawaii’s island of Oahu when the Army recommended him as one of two chaplains in 2020 to receive instruction at the U.S. Army War College.

War College training is the height of an Army career. It’s preparation for high-level officer assignments. While he studied there, Lewis was ordered to take a Covid vaccine. But his conscience wouldn’t let him.

The immense global pressure for an untested medical treatment alarmed Lewis’ long-developed spiritual spidey senses: “The fact that commerce and travel and careers were hinging on receipt of this vaccine, that bothered me.” It seemed to violate biblical injunctions against total obedience to any state.

Lewis and his wife spent months talking about what to do. They knew objecting could kill his career right as he hit its peak, after decades of personal and family sacrifices.

In the end, he couldn’t violate his duty to obey the still, small voice inside, Lewis says. So he filed for a religious exemption. Like almost every other solely religious exemption of the 37,000 DOD told Congress soldiers filed, it was delayed. Then it was denied. So were Lewis’ appeals. He says his superiors told him he could get vaccinated or get drummed out of the military, but while Lewis was willing to sacrifice his body for his country, he would not sacrifice his soul.

So the Army punished him, first by leaving him with no orders upon graduation from War College. That left Lewis and his wife to sit for 11 months in student housing with no assignment for Lewis while another class of students came and went.

“My career was ended by those 11 months of unrated time,” Lewis said. The inaction the Army forced him into destroyed his ratings in the military’s evaluating system. When Congress ended the vaccine mandate, the military assigned Lewis to a rural post in Maryland, where he mostly oversees civilian contractors across the world who have local pastors to tend their spiritual needs.

He says he’s asked superiors whether he will have any opportunities to use his high-level, taxpayer-provided War College training. Lewis says they repeatedly ignored the question. So he’s filed to retire and will leave the Army for good in early 2025.

“I took real strength in the idea that my faith is more important than some bureaucrat’s opinion of my faith. It sustained me, it got me through,” Lewis said.

After asking The Federalist to provide Lewis’ birth date and Social Security Number and to delay this article’s publication, U.S. Army spokeswoman Heather Hagan, who according to her email signature works in the Pentagon, finally provided this in response to a request for comment: “As a matter of policy, the Army does not comment on ongoing litigation.”

Not Just about Harvesting Killed Babies

Each conscientious objector’s reasoning is in some way unlike all the others’. There are commonalities, but they blend in individual ways, like fingerprints. That’s why religious objections to vaccines are not erased by a European Covid shot called Novavax, which its owner claims was developed and produced with no human embryo brutalization.

Army Chief of Chaplains Thomas Solhjem, who is now retired, highlighted Novavax when it came out in 2022. He ignored many soldiers’ religious objections not based on the vaccines’ use of murdered babies. They include concerns about damaging human health and reproductive capacity, ignoring natural immunity, the ethics of allegedly emergency decrees, the lack of informed consent, and heavy-handed manipulation tactics that include refusing to acknowledge any potentially legitimate conscience objections to the shots whatsoever.

It’s also unlikely any medical intervention today lacks a connection with the discarded little girl. Research done on cells descended from HEK 293’s tiny body is so “ubiquitous” now, wrote Dr. Melissa Moschella in 2020, that “Anyone who wants to completely avoid benefiting from the use of HEK 293 would effectively have to eschew the use of any medical treatments or biological knowledge developed or updated within the past forty years.” Even Tylenol was developed using cells her body generated.

Lewis said Solhjem’s video “blew my mind” because the job of a chaplain is not to negotiate people’s religious beliefs, it’s to support their exercise: “He didn’t say, ‘I stand with you. No matter what your reasons are, you have a right to believe them, and I will stand and die here defending your right.’ … It’s antithetical to what chaplains are supposed to do.”

‘The Dept of Defense Is Hostile to Religion’

Several chaplains provided The Federalist “scripts” that military branches sent chaplains to pressure conscientious objectors into compliance rather than ascertain whether their objections were sincere. They include quotes from figures such as imams and preacher Russell Moore supporting vaccination.

But, for example, the Bible doesn’t say Russell Moore is its chief prophet and interpreter. While theologians and church tradition are helpful guides that Christians should take seriously, the final authority over Christianity is the Bible itself, and it says every individual is responsible before God for how he understands and applies it.

“The Department of Defense is hostile to religion,” said the chaplains’ lawyer, Art Schulcz, who is also a veteran. He said the way the DOD handled the vaccine mandate has contributed to the military’s recruiting crisis by repelling recruits and current soldiers with serious faith convictions. In response to ongoing shortfalls, U.S. military branches are lowering enlistment standards and issuing waivers of risk factors such as marijuana use.

The U.S. military’s chaplains “recruiting deficit is extreme,” wrote Rear Adm. Gregory Todd, the Navy’s chief of chaplains, last year.



Hillary Still Doesn't Understand Why She Lost in 2016, and It'll Be the Same Reason Biden Loses


Hillary Clinton is one of those people that I would forget exists if it wasn't for the corporate media's attempts to prop her up like a Clinton aide trying to furtively move her into a van after she'd passed out. 

Clinton is a bitter woman. The 2016 election was supposed to be hers to win. She was supposed to be the first woman president. She was supposed to have her name printed in history books and celebrated for generations as the one who broke the glass ceiling. The media worked night and day to make it happen. Activist groups sang her praises. She had a lot of people fooled into believing she was her

And she would've gotten away with it, too, if it wasn't for that meddling orange man and his army of internet trolls. 

Clinton clearly has it out for Trump, and nearly every conversation she has with a working camera involves complaints that he somehow stole the election from her. Apparently, questioning election integrity is okay with the right ideological alignment. 

Clinton is still harping on about her stolen destiny today. As Reclaim the Net reported, Clinton is warning that Trump's misinformation-laden trolls are about to steal the election for him again with memes and "virulent content": 

So, Clinton-the-victim’s comments now, half a year before the next US presidential election and amid mainstream media’s “disinformation/AI panic” might read as little, if anything, more than political campaigning.

She claims this is her focus now: still talking about the alleged wrongdoing done to her in 2016, still alleging this was all about “disinformation” – and that it was all “primitive” – compared to what she anticipates is happening now.

...

“Their, you know, the so-called ‘Dark Web’ was filled with these kinds of memes and stories and videos of all sorts…portraying me in all kinds of… less than flattering ways,” Clinton said. “And we knew something’s going on, but we didn’t understand the full extent of the very clever way in which it was insinuated into social media.”

Did memes and viral content help defeat Clinton? 

Yes. She's not wrong.

But Clinton made herself an easy target. She was very meme-able, and no, not because she's a woman. It's because she was a trainwreck being sold to us as a high-performance machine. The scrambling that was constantly being done to make her seem more popular and capable than she actually was bordered on the comical. 

All the king's horses and all the king's men couldn't help Clinton look good. She had celebrities sing songs for her, talking heads promise a brighter future with her in command, and every trick in the book was deployed but in the end, Clinton was just too much of a joke. 

It was too easy to make Clinton a meme, and the same is now happening to Joe Biden. If Clinton believes she's watching it happen again, it's because it is. 

He's just as ridiculous as she is. 

Biden might have gotten away with a lot in 2020 because he had quite a bit of political cover. Not only was he from the Democrat's Obama golden era, but he had the benefit of being not Trump. The entire Democrat platform could have been boiled down to that one thing. 

But now, after nearly four years, a great deal of information has been made clear to us about Biden. He's past his sell-by date by a lot. His family is neck-deep in sketchy dealings. His son is a drug-addled whoremonger. He runs the economy like a communist college freshman, and his border policies leave a lot to be desired...and by that, I mean having ones that involve pretending we have a border. 

But if Clinton was the first verse, Biden is just a repeat. 

He has everyone in the press working overtime to prop him up. Celebrities are trying their best to make him seem cool and capable. 

But like Clinton, Biden is too perfect of a target for internet jokes because he is, himself, a joke. 

Clinton, like many Democrats, is advocating for a sort of censorship to take place in order to stop it all, but at the end of the day, if the Democrats want not to be made fun of on the internet so badly, then maybe they should pick better candidates. 

It's telling that they'd rather shut everyone else up than be better themselves. 



Are You Better Off Than You Were 4 Years Ago? Whoopi Thinks That's a 'Stupid Question.'


Bob Hoge reporting for RedState 

The shrill, perpetually angry ladies of "The View" always make for Must-Miss TV, unless you enjoy feeling like someone's taken a dental saw to your skull, but Monday's episode featured a notably vitriolic, incomprehensible diatribe by co-host Whoopi Goldberg. 

She went into a fury when discussing the question made famous by Ronald Reagan during a 1980 debate against incumbent president Jimmy Carter: "Are you better off than you were four years ago?" 

Remember when we had a president who could get through a sentence?

Personally, when an incumbent is running for reelection, I think perhaps the only question that's essential to ask is, are things better than when they took office? But not to Whoopi—she thinks the question is "stupid" and starts off by rambling on about people's memories. If you can understand just what the heck she is saying, you are a better person than I am.

"The View" co-host Whoopi Goldberg claimed Americans had "short memory issues" on Monday while discussing a question posed by Republicans about whether people felt "better off" than they were four years ago.

"So why is it some people are having short memory issues? There are plenty of other reasons to feel good about where we actually are. Why isn’t that tracking?" she asked. 

It's our memory that's at fault? My memory tells me that four years ago, we didn't have crippling inflation, millions of illegal aliens crossing our southern border, and back-breaking interest rates. 

Watch:




Then—predictably—she goes down the racial road, and once again, I have absolutely no idea what she's getting at, I only know that she was heavily triggered.

Black people, we were not in this insanity of trying to figure out why our history’s no longer welcome in the educational system. Women were realizing something was happening. If you were coming from another country, if you were coming to this country to find a better life, you were not welcome. Listen. It wasn’t a good time for lots of people.

If forced to interpret this nonsense, I guess I would say that she's angry that there's been a backlash against the divisive CRT and DEI ideologies, she's obsessed with abortion, and she thinks illegal aliens should be welcomed. But I'm just guessing here.

It's at the end of her diatribe, however, when she fills with righteous anger and really heads off the rails, raging nonsensically about "dead people."

All you have to do is ask, are we better off than we were? Ask the thousands of people who are no longer here. That’s how you know if we’re better off. Ask their families. Are they better off without their loved ones? 

What a stupid question! It’s a stupid question and disrespectful to the American people in my opinion, in my humble opinion.

What?! This is absolute gobbledygook. People die during every administration; that is the rhythm of life, Whoopi. If you're talking about those who died from COVID, more people have passed away during Biden's tenure than Trump's. So what the heck is your point?

Her permanent, incomprehensible outrage is hard to take when she makes millions a year just for sitting in a chair and spouting out nonsense.

But we know why she's so mad. It's not the question she doesn't like—it's the answer. You see, we can be sure she's seen the recent Fox Poll that asked if people were better off than they were four years ago, and only 22 percent of respondents said yes. 

Fifty-two percent said they were worse off.

Oopsie, Whoopi, that's what's really got in your craw because you will manically support Biden despite all the evidence that he's been an absolute disaster on so many levels. Pundits like you can keep telling us not to believe our own experiences, but thankfully it appears that more and more people are starting to wake up and tune you out.



Most Voters Think Biden Would Die Before End of Second Term, Absurdly Making Kamala Harris President


Mike Miller reporting for RedState 

As the days and months continue to tick by and the 2024 presidential election draws closer and closer, an unenviable constant remains for embattled President Joe Biden

Virtually every major polling organization continues to confirm a myriad of voter concerns that could stick a fork in the 81-year-old, cognitively declining president. From the out-of-control illegal alien invasion to the disastrous effects of Bidenomics on tens of millions of hardworking Americans who struggle to make ends meet to a growing concern among likely voters that if Biden wins in November, he'll die during his second term, leaving America with the once unthinkable: Kamala Harris as the president of the United States, the electorate isn't happy about Joe.

Twilight Zone? Damn close.

According to a new poll conducted exclusively for Daily Mail, only 38 percent of likely voters believe Biden would be alive at the end of another four-year term — again, making the unthinkable a reality, which 36 percent of survey respondents said they believe will happen.

While the survey found Biden's age is a major concern for a majority of voters, former President Donald Trump is only four years younger than Biden, yet the survey found that voters have far fewer doubts about the 77-year-old. 

James Johnson, cofounder of J.L. Partners, which conducted the poll, put it bluntly:

Voters think Biden is too old, and they are not changing their minds. The difficulty for Biden is that views of him are not shaped through events such as his State of the Union address — which people who had seen it felt was fiery — but through consumption of the hundreds of viral social media clips of Biden stumbling and slurring. 

That solid perception that he is too old feeds through to a sense he is too weak, and it is a major problem for him going into November. Frankly, they do not think he is up to the job — and that makes his re-election a much harder task.

Is there any doubt that the cognitive capacity of the guy on the left is less than that of the guy on the right? 

Look, I'm not among those who support everything Donald says, writes, or does, but here's the thing: When I vote in November I will neither be voting for a moral leader nor a saint. Rather, nominations to the Supreme Court and protecting the southern (and now, northern) border from the continuing legal alien invasion will stand at the top of why I'll vote as I voted in 2016 and 2020. 

Unsurprisingly — and justifiably so — Trump has repeatedly blistered Biden as unfit for office because of his age and obvious cognitive decline, including this gem — which Trump said at a Georgia rally in mid-March:

Everything Joe Biden touches turns to sh*t.

Later in the speech, Trump mocked Biden's stutter. 

A separate DailyMail–J.L. Partners poll of 1,000 likely voters found that Trump has maintained the four-point lead he has held over Biden since December.