Tuesday, March 12, 2024

Barry County sheriff claims special prosecutor trying to ‘usurp’ voting machine probe




 HASTINGS, Mich. (WOOD) — An affidavit by Barry County Sheriff Dar Leaf claims a subpoena to turn over his voter fraud files is an attempt to obstruct his “very serious” investigation that he says involves “Serbian foreign nationals.”

Muskegon County Prosecutor D.J. Hilson confirmed he filed a subpoena on March 7 for Leaf’s investigation into unsubstantiated claims by President Donald Trump supporters that Dominion voting tabulators were illegally manipulated during the November 2020 election.

“My department is in possession of sensitive documents that are part of an ongoing investigation involving Dominion employees,” Leaf wrote in the affidavit dated March 8. “These Dominion employees directed and tasked Serbian foreign nationals to remotely access the Michigan election system.

“I am not willing to compromise my investigation by providing my entire file,” the affidavit continued.

He wrote his investigation also “relates to” Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel.

Leaf declined to comment to News 8 on Tuesday.

Hilson, acting as a special prosecutor, told News 8 that he issued a subpoena on March 7 for Leaf’s records as part of his case in Oakland County against three Trump supporters indicted by a citizens grand jury of accessing and tampering with Dominion voting tabulators.

The trial is scheduled to begin April 1 against attorney Stefanie Lambert. Also charged are former GOP attorney general candidate Matthew DePerno, former GOP state Rep. Daire Rendon.

Hilson has said there was not sufficient evidence to charge Leaf with a crime.

In his affidavit, Leaf wrote that Lambert has been working for him and his office since December 2020.

Five vote tabulators were taken from three counties in Michigan to a hotel room, according to documents released by Nessel’s office. Investigators found that the tabulators were broken into and “tests” were performed on the equipment. They said that DePerno was there.

The Barry County clerk told News 8 in June 2022 that someone from the Barry County sheriff’s department had taken a Dominion voting tabulator from Irving Township in 2021. She said when the machine was returned, it had a broken security seal.

Another machine involved was in Roscommon County, where Rendon allegedly told the county clerk that the state House was investigating “election fraud,” Nessel has previously said.

Hilson has said that county and municipal clerks who handed over voting tabulators were “deceived by some of the charged defendants.”

“The clerks had no idea of the scope, nature or duration of how their tabulators were going to be manipulated or that they would be out of their possessions for an extended period of time,” the prosecutor wrote in a release.

Experts asked to look at the voting machines were also deceived, Hilson said, saying they were told that what was happening was legal.

In Leaf’s affidavit, he said he planned to file a motion to quash the subpoena and a civil lawsuit against Hilson “for attempting to usurp my investigation.”

Barry County sheriff claims special prosecutor trying to ‘usurp’ voting machine probe | WOODTV.com


Donald Trump Stung as New Poll Shows How Unpopular He Is

 



Donald Trump continues to have a low favorability score among Americans, new polling shows, despite being the likely Republican nominee after winning the lion's share of primaries and seeing off his only remaining rival.

An ABC News/Ipsos survey of 536 U.S. adults, conducted between March 8-9, found that 29 percent have a favorable view of the former president compared to 59 percent who view him unfavorably.

It came after Trump secured all but one of the primaries on Super Tuesday—giving him 1,075 out of 1,215 delegates he needs to become the presumptive Republican nominee—which prompted former U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley to drop out of the race to leave him unopposed. Primaries being held on Tuesday could push Trump over the line.

Loaded61.60%
Current Time 0:02
Duration 0:58
Newsweek
Donald Trump Stung as New Poll Shows How Unpopular He Is
0
View on WatchView on Watch

Trump's popularity has remained largely unchanged since last summer. In similar polls conducted last year, which have a margin of error of 4.5 percent either way, he has hovered around a 30 percent favorability rating.

That rating dipped to 25 percent—with 61 percent viewing him unfavorably—at the start of April last year, immediately after he became the first president in U.S. history to be indicted with criminal charges, which he denies, in New York.

Newsweek approached the Trump campaign via email for comment on Monday.

The same ABC/Ipsos poll found that President Joe Biden, who is on course to be renominated by the Democratic Party, is also viewed as similarly unpopular, though his unfavorability rating is slightly lower.

Some 33 percent viewed the incumbent favorably to 54 percent who viewed him unfavorably. In November, a similar poll put his unfavorability rating at 50 percent with his favorability unchanged, while in prior polls the two ratings have modulated around the same numbers.

Neither candidate is viewed as more popular than unpopular, recent polling has consistently shown, with more people disapproving of both than approving. Analysts have said that both will struggle to entice voters to turn out for the election due to their disenchantment with the choice of candidates.

The latest ABC/Ipsos poll found that 36 percent thought Trump was trusted to do a better job as president to 33 percent who thought Joe Biden would—but 30 percent thought neither would.

The two candidates have been running neck and neck in national polls, with just a few percentage points separating them.

Trump may suffer from becoming the first former president to now face four criminal trials—which he claims are politically motivated—which are due to take place while he is campaigning for the 2024 election. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

At the same time, Biden, already the oldest serving president in U.S. history at 81, has faced concerns about his age and mental acuity over a number of public gaffes, which Republicans have used to imply Biden is unfit to continue as president for another term.

If re-elected, he would be 86 by the end of his second term. But the president has brushed off queries about his physical and mental health, telling a news conference in February that his "memory is fine" and "I know what the hell I'm doing."

Recent polling also shows that nearly half of U.S. adults think Trump, 77, is too old to serve another term, and the former president has also faced questions about his mental agility.

Biden has been criticized for his approach to undocumented immigration into the U.S. and the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas. Around two thirds of voters disapproved of his handling of immigration and the Middle Eastern conflict, the ABC/Ipsos poll found.

Some of this dissent has come from Democrats who have threatened not to vote for the president over the situation in Gaza. However, political scientists have suggested Biden's base will hold their nose over the issue when faced with the prospect of a Trump victory.

Woke Policies Threaten to Shatter America's Multi-Generational Military legacy

The U.S. Army, Navy and Air Force all face a severe and worsening recruiting crisis that imperils their future strength, readiness, and warfighting capabilities. Despite devoting immense resources and effort towards attracting qualified recruits, only the Marine Corps and Space Force are meeting targets for bringing in the next generation of talent. This deeply troubling trend has profound implications for national security if left unaddressed.

At the core of this challenge lies a growing disconnect between the culture and values of contemporary American youth and the traditional ethos of military service. Compared to past generations, an ever-shrinking percentage of the population has any direct familial ties or personal familiarity with the armed forces. The concept of military service as a default pathway or rite of passage has diminished significantly.

Most concerning, the recruiting shortfalls now impact a vital demographic that has historically formed the backbone of the all-volunteer force -- young Americans from multi-generational military families. For decades, these legacy families have sustained a vibrant pipeline of highly motivated and dedicated recruits, passing down a shared sense of purpose, tradition, and identity. However, that generational continuity of service shows unprecedented signs of fraying.

My two sons are currently serving active-duty naval officers and represent the fourth generation of service for our family. And while my wife and I are exceedingly proud of this legacy, we are not likely to encourage our three young grandchildren to serve unless things change dramatically.

Prominent voices attribute this disillusionment among legacy military families to the Pentagon's embrace of "woke" social policies and ideological agendas. Critics allege these policies are supplanting the traditional focus on combat readiness and warfighting excellence. They argue that the zealous pursuit of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives alienates the very Americans who would otherwise maintain unbroken family traditions of service.

As Thomas Spoehr, director of The Heritage Foundation's Center for National Defense, notes in his commentary "The Rise of Wokeness in the Military," "Perhaps most troubling, these DEI initiatives are being pursued at the expense of the military's core function: to protect the United States by preparing to fight and win the nation's wars."

Similarly, during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Senator Dan Sullivan of Alaska relayed the story of a former Air Force colonel whose son rejected applying to the military academies because of "this woke cultural revulsion that's trying to be shoved down the throats of our military services." This sentiment is not an isolated anecdote but indicative of a deeper and metastasizing disenchantment.

While the U.S. military has always evolved to reflect broader societal changes, critics contend that the current fixation on identity politics, ideological purity tests, and social justice theories erodes the apolitical and merit-based culture essential for unit cohesion and combat effectiveness. They see a force increasingly distracted from its core mission of deterring and defeating foreign adversaries.

At a time of mounting global threats and intensifying great power competition, a U.S. military plagued by internal discord, identity obsessions, and alienation from large swaths of its traditional recruiting pool becomes an acute strategic liability. Rivals like China undertake the most rapid peacetime military expansion in history, while rogue regimes like Iran and North Korea advance their nuclear and missile capabilities undeterred.

The stakes could not be higher, yet the armed forces are mired in ideological tumult that drives away the progeny of its most ardent and natural constituencies. As Josiah Lippincott, a former U.S. Marine Corps intelligence officer, writes in The Federalist, "White men are increasingly unwilling to join an institution that openly discriminates against them, insults them, and attacks their history and identity."

Bingo. Why would we want our grandchildren to serve in a military that does not value their family legacy or their Christian values and worldview? And how long will it take to rebuild third, four and fifth-generation family legacies once they are broken? 

Resolving this crisis will require a paradigm shift at the Pentagon to realign priorities and restore a laser focus on combat readiness as the supreme imperative. Pursuing DEI goals, when prudent and narrowly tailored, is not intrinsically at odds with military effectiveness. However, the scales have tipped much too far towards social experimentation at the expense of cultivating an unrivaled and apolitical warfighting ethos.

Should these corrosive trends continue unabated, bleeding out the military's lifeblood of multi-generational recruits, more drastic and untenable revisions to U.S. defense posture may be forced upon the nation. 

The cost of failure is unthinkable. Leaders must act now, with fierce urgency and ruthless focus, to steer the military back onto the course of unsurpassed might and readiness. Appeasing the misguided architects of ideological misdirection is not an option. There can be no higher priority than getting this right--the future of the all-volunteer force and the nation's security depend on it.



Jacob Chansley tells Tucker: "January 6th was a Deep State set up and a Deep State psyop...

https://tuckercarlson.com/tucker-carlson-uncensored-jacob-chansley/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=na&utm_campaign=20240312_march12dailybrief&utm_content=314099

EPISODE DETAILS

They told us Jake Chansley, the QAnon Shaman, was a dangerous lunatic who deserved to be sent to prison, if not shot to death. Many believed it. But is he actually crazy? Judge for yourself.

Not sure if you'll be able to see the 31 minute video...

Hre's the Twitter about 10 minutes

Good luck.

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1767670653778354335

The Democrats Praying for an Open Convention Peter Savodnik on whether Joe Biden will really be the nominee.

 https://www.thefp.com/p/democrats-praying-for-an-open-convention?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=260347&post_id=142500680&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=rd3ao&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

In the fever dreams of some hard-core Democrats, Joe Biden will, some time in the next six months, announce he is not running for reelection. At that point, Michelle Obama will ride across the horizon, her horse rearing as she holds her sword high, a warrior queen ready to vanquish Donald Trump and save the republic. 


Like I said, fever dreams. Last week the former First Lady, for the umpteenth time, ruled out running for president.


But less crazy versions of this fantasy have seized the minds of many Democratic insiders. Even after Biden’s reasonably competent State of the Union speech on Thursday, politicians, strategists, and donors are worried about the president’s declining faculties. 


They are searching for a parachute—desperate to get off what looks like it might be the doomed final flight of Air Biden. But is there a way off the plane? Or is it too late? 


In The Free Press today, Peter Savodnik speaks to Democrats in the know and asks them the important question: But will it actually happen?

Here’s Peter: 


Party insiders have one final hope: that Biden will drop his reelection bid so a new nominee (Whitmer? Newsom? The Rock?) can ascend in August.

This is the fantasy: 

It’s late July. The Republicans have just wrapped up their convention in Milwaukee. Donald Trump leads Joe Biden in every poll, in every battleground state, and Republicans are poised to hold on to the House and maybe take over the Senate.

In an address from the Oval Office, Biden announces that he will not seek reelection in November, that it is time for a new generation of Democrats to take the helm—throwing his party’s nomination battle to the four-day Democratic convention in Chicago, starting August 19.

I contacted 10 Democrats who have advised presidential candidates, written speeches, raised money—people who ostensibly know something about the political game—and none of them wanted to speak on the record, because they want to keep working in Democratic politics and going to Democratic dinner parties. But they pretty much agreed on two things: 


This is the fantasy: 

It’s late July. The Republicans have just wrapped up their convention in Milwaukee. Donald Trump leads Joe Biden in every poll, in every battleground state, and Republicans are poised to hold on to the House and maybe take over the Senate.


In an address from the Oval Office, Biden announces that he will not seek reelection in November, that it is time for a new generation of Democrats to take the helm—throwing his party’s nomination battle to the four-day Democratic convention in Chicago, starting August 19.


I contacted 10 Democrats who have advised presidential candidates, written speeches, raised money—people who ostensibly know something about the political game—and none of them wanted to speak on the record, because they want to keep working in Democratic politics and going to Democratic dinner parties. But they pretty much agreed on two things: 

  1. Biden is doomed. (In the wake of Super Tuesday, the 77-year-old Donald Trump led the 81-year-old Biden in an average of RealClearPolitics polls and was up more than four points in battleground states.)


  1. There is one way we can avoid catastrophe—for the Democratic Party and the country: an open Democratic National Convention this summer, giving rise to a younger, more viable, more vital nominee. “Fingers crossed. Hoping for a Deus Ex Machina!” a Democratic adviser and fundraiser in Los Angeles texted me. One Democratic bundler said: “I frankly hope that both Trump and Biden have some sort of medical incident that won’t kill them but will make them reevaluate the race.”


One Democratic activist, who has advised presidential candidates, told me Biden should follow the model of former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who stepped aside for new leadership after Democrats lost the House in 2022. “She created a situation where the top three leaders—her and James Clyburn and Steny Hoyer—the three of them, all in their eighties, stepped aside for three younger people: Hakeem Jeffries, Pete Aguilar, Katherine Clark,” he told me. “It was a generational shift that Nancy initiated brilliantly.” 


In this presidential fantasy scenario, Biden would arrive at the United Center in Chicago for the open Democratic convention in August, having declared his decision to withdraw from the race—and the delegates go berserk. There are nearly 24,000 seats in the arena, and they’re packed, and everyone is cheering Joe! Joe! Joe! Joe! They. Love. Him. 


He gives a short speech on night one of the convention: “My fellow Democrats, 56 years ago, we convened in this city under very different circumstances. We were fractured, and for that we were cast into the wilderness. I am here to tell you what you already know—that there is a growing roster of talented young Democrats eager to run on our record, eager to tackle the most pressing issues facing us: the border, the decline of rural America, the decline of blue-collar jobs, the explosion in fentanyl, the rise of violent crime, the lack of affordable housing. 


We want to solve these problems, and that starts with nominating our next president.” 

Over the course of the next three days, the convention, far from being the corporatized coronation we’ve come to expect, is more like an audition, with the Big Five governors—Illinois’s J.B. Pritzker, Colorado’s Jared Polis, California’s Gavin Newsom, Pennsylvania’s Josh Shapiro, and Michigan’s Gretchen Whitmer—dominating the headlines. 


One Democratic speechwriter who knows Whitmer well told me: “Gretchen Whitmer’s team is absolutely getting ready in case Biden steps down before the convention.” 

“Gretchen’s the whole package—woman, Upper Midwest, attractive-ish,” another Democratic speechwriter told me.


Few, if any, Democratic influencers believe Newsom—who debated Republican former presidential contender Ron DeSantis in November in what was widely viewed as a test run for 2028, or maybe 2024—can win.


“I don’t see Gavin Newsom or J.B. Pritzker resonating in the heartland of America—do you?” a Democratic adviser close to Barack Obama told me. 

A Democratic strategist in Washington, D.C., voiced enthusiasm for Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson at the top of the ticket and Virginia Rep. Abigail Spanberger for veep. “He’s a movie star at the Arnold Schwarzenegger level,” the strategist said, “and a person of color, and he’s part of the immigrant story, and also sort of a Republican, but not a dick. She’s tall, strong, charismatic, feminine, but not movie-star looks, which is important—you can’t be too hot.”


One Democratic adviser heaped praise on Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro. But Republican strategist David Kochel was skeptical. “He’s Jewish, and young Dems are so anti-Israel,” Kochel texted me. (A Democratic screenwriter agreed with Kochel. When I asked whether a Jew could win the Democratic presidential nomination in 2024, he replied flatly: “No.”)


Also vying for the nomination would likely be Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, Minnesota senator Amy Klobuchar, Connecticut senator Chris Murphy, maybe North Carolina governor Roy Cooper, maybe House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, probably Kentucky governor Andy Beshear, and definitely Vice President Kamala Harris, about whom most Democrats say the same thing off the record. 


“She’s probably tired of being fucking hated,” the speechwriter I interviewed told me, referring to Harris.

The Democratic adviser in Los Angeles said Harris is a liability for Team Biden: “I actually like the woman. She lives a block and a half from me, and if there were anyone else on the ticket, things would be less of a concern, but the odds that he dumps her are slim to none.”


Democratic bundlers have also mentioned a few other names, including Anthony Blinken, Mark Cuban, and AOC (who turns 35, the minimum required age to run for president, three weeks before Election Day). 

The convention would be a free-for-all—the first open convention since 1956, when Democratic presidential nominee Adlai Stevenson asked delegates to select his running mate.


To be clear, on the record, no elected Democrat or Democratic pundit or pollster or campaign adviser would ever entertain the possibility of this happening.

Off the record, tons (all?) of them would love to see it happen. A large chunk is convinced Biden will not be the nominee—his pretty good performance Thursday at the State of the Union notwithstanding. “He’s just too old, and it’s like no one’s even talking about ‘How is he going to make it to 2029?’ ” one Democratic campaign adviser told me.


I asked Dean Phillips, the Minnesota congressman who challenged Biden for the Democratic nomination and got approximately nowhere, what he thinks will happen if an open convention doesn’t happen—if we continue down the path we are on in November.


“We will likely see a meaningful alternative party form for the exhausted majority, for the center-right, center-left Americans who no longer believe the operating bases of the Democratic and Republican parties serve them,” Phillips said, looking beyond the current election cycle. “That’s the likely path. I think there’s going to be that energy. We’re reaching rock bottom now.”