Monday, January 29, 2024

Biden, the Border, and Tik Tok Too


President Biden is in a pickle of his own making, and his efforts to deal with it are as idiotic and destructive as his open borders policy has been.

Last month alone over 300,000 mostly military age men illegally crossed our border, with the Border Patrol tasked to easing their invasion and even making them sandwiches rather than detaining and deporting them. Texas governor Greg Abbott directed his National Guard to obstruct their passage by placing floats in the river at the border and installing barbed wire topped fences at Shelby Park in Eagle Pass, Texas. He also spread the misery the border states were feeling by transporting many of the illegal crossers to cities that had virtue signaled they were “sanctuary cities,” cities that would not turn over illegals to ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) for detention and deportation. Now, those same cities -- which apparently thought El Paso was better able to handle housing and feeding and providing medical care for millions of largely needy military-aged men than they were -- are begging for help and federal money as they are overwhelmed by the task they dreamed would be shouldered by the border states.

Polls show that the majority of citizens are strongly opposed to this invasion. Former FBI officials have warned that this influx of unvetted invaders from around the world who have been allowed to travel freely around the country pose a serious national security threat. Still, the President, who blocked further construction of the wall Trump was constructing and ended the Trump policy of making asylum seekers stay in Mexico as their claims were processed, doubled down on allowing unlimited free passage into the United Sates. He demanded that Abbott tear down the border barriers. A federal court enjoined the Administration from removing the barriers to free passage into the country. (Most of these asylum claims lack merit, but it takes years to process during which time the applicants are living and working here.) “Border Patrol is being instructed to facilitate illegal entry at scale into the United States. The fundamental problem is that anyone can claim asylum with zero proof, which means all of Earth can come to America.”

The Administration sought relief from the Supreme Court and got it: The District Court injunction was lifted. 

Abbott continued nevertheless to fortify the barriers. Governors of 26 states wrote in support of Abbott’s actions, some even have sent National Guardsmen and other law enforcement to help Texas defend the border. 

Nothing, it seems, will stop Biden from pursuing this unpopular, and in my mind, illegal policy. This week, the Administration placed its hopes on a negotiated deal with Congress, tying an immigration “fix” with aid to Ukraine and Israel. Some Senate Republican poohbahs might be amenable but it doesn’t appear the House will go along with any such thing. To date no one knows what the specifics are except that the Democrats at the outset declared “off limits” any discussion about completing the wall. There’s been a perfectly good immigration law on the books for years which was passed by the House and Senate. It simply needs to be enforced, not ignored.

The open border administration is floundering between trying to satisfy more moderate voters (which unfortunately for Democrats includes many of the minority voters in their base who are most deleteriously affected by an open border policy) and its far-left youth faction. 

First, they had the Department of Homeland Security demand access to Shelby Park, to remove the invasion barriers. Texas attorney general Ken Paxton made some counter-demands:

“By February 15, DHS must supply the official plat maps and deeds demonstrating the precise parcels to which they claim ownership, an explanation of how Texas is preventing access to those specific parcels, documentation showing that Eagle Pass or Texas ever granted permission for DHS to erect infrastructure that interferes with border security, and proof of Congress empowering DHS to turn a Texas park into an unofficial and illegal port of entry. If the federal government is going to make such claims, it must provide proof.”  

In a sense, I’m sorry DHS won’t be getting access because one picture of them cutting the wire in Shelby Park should insure a Republican landslide victory. 

The Administration at some point through the media remoras let it be known it was considering criminal action against the Texas Border Patrol. Unfortunately for that plan, the Texas Border Patrol doesn’t seem to be scared off

According to a new post put out by the Border Patrol Union, and a new report from Griff Jenkins of Fox News, Biden has lost operational control of the situation, at least in a practical sense. 

The Biden administration had initially warned Texas that it had until mid-day Friday to relinquish control of Shelby Park, the nearby boat dock, and the International Bridge. That deadline has now come and gone, and instead of there being a major clash between the Border Patrol and the state-controlled soldiers on site, it appears those on the ground have already de-escalated the situation.

The Border Patrol Union ends by slamming Biden for creating the current "catastrophe" and reiterating that there will be no conflict between CBP agents and state forces. The statement is a clear signal of support for the Texas National Guard, its mission, and those leading it, including Gov. Greg Abbott.

Rank-and-file BP agents appreciate and respect what TX has been doing to defend their state in the midst of this catastrophe that the Biden Admin has unleashed on America.

We want to be perfectly clear, there is no fight between rank-and-file BP agents and the TX NG, Gov. Abbott, or TX DPS. It may make flashy headlines, but it simply isn't true.

Furthering the division between the Border Patrol and the White House was a senior CBP official who said they have no plans to follow through on removing the razor wire put up by Texas. Biden has completely lost whatever leverage he had.

This is an incredible turn of events. I don't know if "mutiny" is the right word here, but clearly, Biden has no way to enforce his threats at this point. Border Patrol agents are not going to go along with it and short of using the Insurrection Act to mobilize the U.S. Army (and they likely wouldn't act either), this represents a major roadblock to the president's attempts to further destroy the Southern border. 

All other pathways seemingly having been unavailing, the Administration attempted to economically punish Texas and, in the process, has helped Russia increase its economic hold through energy sales to Europe, strengthen China, cost American jobs, and irritated our allies while doing nothing to promote the “climate change” policies it also stupidly endorses. It announced a ban on further permitting of Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) exporting. 

Nobody in the White House seems to understand that countries sign long-term contracts years in advance so they can plan their energy infrastructure and needs. They won’t build new gas plants or import terminals without supply locked in -- or they will turn to more reliable sources. Russia now looks like a more reliable energy source than the U.S.

Much of the supply from LNG projects in the works is slated for Asia. They would strengthen U.S. relationships and influence in the region to counter China. Xi Jinping no doubt is elated by the Administration’s pause, which will do more damage to U.S. strategic interests than blocking the Keystone XL pipeline.

Re-election imperatives have partly restrained the President’s attack on fossil fuels in his first term, but don’t expect the same in a second. Recall how the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in early 2022 backtracked on a plan to conduct greenhouse-gas analyses for natural gas pipelines and export projects after West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin raised a ruckus. 

But Mr. Manchin is retiring, and Mr. Biden won’t need to worry about him in a second term. Nor will he have to heed voters in states such as Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. Mr. McKibben will lead a no-holds-barred children’s crusade against fossil fuels. Is Mr. Biden trying to give Americans another reason to vote for Donald Trump?

The largest LNG operations happen to be in Texas and it is impossible to see this as anything but a means to punish Abbott’s closing of the border. It will do nothing to ease chimerical “climate change.” Natural gas is one of the most benign sources of energy, even if you subscribe -- and I do not -- to the notion that CO2 emissions need to be severely limited. What it will do is create great problems for our European allies and Asian countries who depend on and plan for steady supplies of energy to meet their domestic needs. Who dreamed up this ludicrous strategy? Apparently 25-year-old Tik Tok “influencer” Alex Haraus, who demanded Biden save the planet by killing the Calcasieu Pass 2 Natural gas Project.

It appears that having infuriated most of the country with an outlandish immigration policy, it hopes to pick up the ignorant youth vote to make up for the loss of millions of voters who see and feel the consequences of those policies.



X22, And we Know, and more- January 29

 




Conservatives, Give War A Chance


Editor's note: After this column was set for publication, the US military reported that an Iranian-backed militia drone attack killed three service members in Jordan. The Iranians need to pay.

It seems bizarre that I have to tell fellow conservatives this, but it’s sometimes OK to go to war. We’re fighting right now, and some cons about our current armed conflict are up in arms. But war is not inherently wrong. War is sometimes necessary. Sometimes it’s not. And sometimes, a war is poorly run. For example, in America, that “sometimes” is pretty much the entire last 30 years. But that does not mean that war is never an option. Sometimes it’s necessary. Conservatism is not pacifism with lower marginal tax rates.

Again, I don’t know why I have to say this, but I do. There is a strain of modern conservatism that believes all war is inherently wrong and done solely for the sake of corporations and blah blah blah blah blah. I get the cynicism. I deployed a couple of times. But this idea that there is nothing worth fighting over outside our borders is childish. It’s not conservative. It’s just lame. And people should stop thinking it.

Now, there are plenty of wars around the globe we should not want to be a part of. In fact, staying out of wars should be the default. We should not get involved in a war unless a demonstrable American interest is at stake and we have the will and capacity to win. If we don’t, we must stay the hell out. But if those conditions are met, we need to be ready to fight. 

In contrast, some cons think we have to be deeply involved everywhere. We don’t. The Ukraine War has turned into a stalemate where I believe the Russians have an advantage. Yet, many people in the conservative movement don’t seem to want to admit that unpleasant reality. I would prefer not to have to. I trained Ukrainians. I served with Ukrainians. I think they were wronged, and I prefer that they win. I wish the Ukrainians weren’t going to lose this war. Still, I am familiar with this thing called history – something a lot of people are apparently unaware of – and history teaches that the Russians usually lose at the beginning of a war, then build up their massive forces using the endless flow of bodies from the interior, and eventually defeat their opponent. I know that Ukraine is so corrupt that it offends Nigerians and that it is not a free-wheeling democracy. I also know that we currently have an open southern border, which is practically inviting in enemies to slaughter us, and it’s very hard to make the argument that we must devote ourselves to endlessly funding the protection of foreigners’ territory when we refuse to do so here at home for our own people. Is it a logical argument? No. Is it a powerful argument? Oh, hell yeah. 

So, in the case of Ukraine, we should be less focused on giving it money and more focused on getting the best deal possible right now. We certainly should not intervene. And we should certainly not set ourselves up for a situation where we must intervene, which means Ukraine cannot be part of NATO. The insanity of inviting Ukraine into NATO and thereby inviting a war with Russia should be manifest to everyone. Why it isn’t is baffling. The neocon nimrods who are eager to get into wars are just as bad and just as unconservative as those cons who’ve never seen a war they wanted to fight.

There’s a war between Israel and Hamas, with the background being the war between Iran and the United States. We’ve just been pretending there has not been a war between America and Iran for decades. Now, I would prefer we were not at war with Iran, but Iran seems to disagree, and it gets a vote. The idea that we would be somehow starting a war with Iran is historical illiteracy. From the time Iranians took American hostages in 1979 through murdering hundreds of Marines in Beirut and thousands of Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan, Iran has been waging a war against the United States. Recognizing the obvious and desiring to defeat a threat to American lives and interests is not being a “neocon.” It’s just being a con. 

We can’t just wish the reality of the world away with stupid clichés about how “We are not the world’s policeman” or “No more forever wars.” These people are killing Americans, or at least trying to. If America First means allowing semi-human savages to murder my fellow citizens, count me the hell out. 

But of course, America First doesn’t mean that. Donald Trump is famously suspicious of foreign entanglements, and properly so, He did not start any new wars, but he tried to finish some. He was getting us out of Afghanistan wisely instead of idiotically, as Biden did. And he put a combat boot in the collective rear of the useless Pentagon and forced it to stamp out ISIS. Under Obama, the woke brass was just treading water in a puddle of failure as the barbarians swept across Syria and Iraq. Trump didn’t hesitate. He killed the enemy dead. And good riddance. 

But he was also wise enough not to get between Kurdish communists and the Turkish forces they have been fighting against for decades. That got him called an “isolationist” and a “betrayer of our allies.” But, of course, no foreigners are allies whom we are obligated to defend unless we have a treaty saying so, and we don’t have a treaty unless our Senators, whom we vote for, ratify it. That’s how we know we have a treaty. That’s how we know we are committed as a nation to putting American lives and treasures on the line. In a democracy – yes, I know it’s a republic – that’s how you make decisions. Somebody does not just unilaterally decide that we are committed to sending a 19-year-old paratrooper from Omaha to get killed sorting out the tribal squabbles of a bunch of seventh-century retreads. America has been there, done that, and no thanks.

But there are times when we must fight, like when our enemies decide to close the sea lanes. America is a maritime power, people. If you know anything about history – and I’m assuming most of the people with silly opinions don’t – you know that the earliest American overseas fights were about the freedom of the seas. Remember that “Shores of Tripoli” line in the Marine Corps song? That was when we sent in the Marines to kill Barbary pirates who were attacking American ships. And properly so. Putting aside that as a maritime nation we need to enforce free transit, people who attack American ships should be killed. They should be killed in vast numbers and made an example of. This innovative tactic will result in fewer people attacking American ships.

We should do it wisely, not foolishly. Badly executed wars make people reluctant to fight necessary ones; that’s just human nature. The failure of our elite over the last few decades is responsible for much of the current confusion between conservatism and pacifism. Our current administration is going with a few pinprick airstrikes and leveling huts with a few hundred million dollars worth of Tomahawk missiles. It should be sending in our Marines. We need to revive the tactic of the punitive expedition, where we go in, kill all the bad guys, then leave, and all that remains are smoldering ruins and mothers using the memory of American Devil Dogs to scare disobedient children for the next dozen generations. 

That’s what we should have done in Afghanistan instead of trying to turn a bunch of backward bandits and Pashtun pederasts into a Norman Rockwellian clone of a New Hampshire town. We should have gone in there, whacked everybody who had anything to do with killing Americans, and left. That’s what we should do to the Houthis, but we know that Iran is backing the Houthis so we should also convert the entire Iranian surface fleet into submarines. It’s time to stop playing footsie with these religious fanatics. There’s a thing called “fear.” Let’s leverage it. When they are afraid of us, they don’t screw with us.

But we are told we should not fight back. Wrong. There is this notion among some in our movement that America has no duty to defend its people. That’s ridiculous. I’m not signing on for that. If you put your paw on an American, you and everybody you ever met needs to go and meet your maker. That’s how the Romans did it. And that’s how we should do it. Did you know nearly three dozen Americans were murdered by Hamas on October 7 and that nearly a dozen more are being held by these creeps? How have we not avenged this? 

That we tolerate this is a disgrace. And what’s also disgraceful is some in the conservative movement hemming and hawing about whether dual citizens count or arguing that our fellow citizens should not have been there in the first place. Hey, I’m America First. That means that I don’t care where a fellow American is; nobody threatens him. If some foreigner messes with him in the deep, dark jungle of Papua New Guinea, our country needs to avenge it. And through this, Americans will experience fewer foreigners messing with us. That’s called deterrence; if you really want fewer wars, you deter them. If you want to have more wars, you show weakness and cowardice. We can’t let these barbarians push us around. That doesn’t satisfy them. That encourages them. 

The bizarre notion that we somehow have a choice about whether we are in a war or not is ridiculous. My new book, “The Attack,” shows the consequences of Biden’s weakness. Our enemies are not afraid of us, so they will come here and murder us. Bet on it. They will come through the wide open southern border door that is being held open by the same incompetent administration that is demonstrating fecklessness and weakness abroad. When you telegraph that you will not fight back, people stop being afraid of you fighting back.

If you want peace, you need to be prepared to kill everybody who wants war. Yeah, I know our government is incompetent. Oh boy, do I know that our military is a disaster. And sure, there are a bunch of people who want to make a lot of money off conflict. Those are things to consider, but simply repeating them turns them into clichés, and clichés are not a substitute for thought.

War is not inherently wrong. Sometimes, war is the answer. Sometimes we’ve got to fight. Not all the time, and not stupidly, but sometimes. We can distinguish between situations. We should not be fighting Russia in Ukraine. We should be fighting Iran right now because if we punch it in the nose, it’s going to stop escalating, as is its pattern. We can’t substitute clichés for thought. We can’t just babble about forever wars as if it’s our fault that we have been under attack by these mutants for over 40 years. I am America First. And sometimes, that means America Fights.



Bill Maher Is the Dems' Canary in the Coal Mine Regarding Trump

Matt Vespa reporting for Townhall 

Bill Maher is firing off red warning flares to his fellow Democrats, but I doubt they’ll listen. He’s a comedian, though one of the more level-headed liberals who have tried to understand the current political landscape. Second, Maher’s staunchly pro-Israel, pro-free speech, and terrified of radical Islam—all sensible positions. His aversion to kowtowing to the authoritarian, politically correct regime of the progressive Left has led to his ostracization, though he still delivers biting commentaries against Republicans. 

Still, he nailed why the Democrats’ 2024 strategy to defeat Donald Trump will blow up in their faces, and it doesn’t take a seasoned political operative to know the defects here. Joe Biden’s approval ratings are atrocious, more commonly seen among term-limited presidents in the twilight of their occupancy in the White House. Biden is near Bush-level approval c. late 2007. Biden must be one of the weakest incumbent presidents to run for re-election, and that’s neutralized most of the built-in election advantages this office brings to these campaign operations. 

Maher aptly noted what we’ve been mentioning all week: you can’t say, ‘Look at this guy’ when your backyard is a mess. That backyard is the Democratic Party base who can’t stand Joe Biden. Labor union support is suspect, as the United Auto Workers president admitted a great majority of his members aren’t supporting Biden. Young people are drifting away over student loan bailout drama and this administration’s support for Israel—it’s also why Muslim voters are rebelling. 

Black and Hispanic voters are also leaving the Biden tent, with non-white working-class voters continuing their march into the Republican Party. As a Democrat, you cannot win an election without these groups. In New York, Donald Trump is beating out Biden with Hispanic voters. It may be one state, but pollsters admit it’s a trend they’re seeing nationwide.  Trump may not be popular, but neither is Biden, and the pervasive mediocrity, incompetence, and outright failure from this presidency is enough to make voters forget whatever misgivings they may have over Donald Trump (via Fox News): 

Maher kicked off his panel discussion Friday night by complaining about how he's feeling "gypped" for the GOP primary since Trump is handily beating his remaining competitor, former U.N. Amb. Nikki Haley.

"We don't even get the audition phase of our reality show we call an election… I feel like I'm snubbed as a citizen," Maher quipped. 

He then sounded the alarm on the "two liabilities" President Biden has, which polling in past months has shown he is losing with "Hispanics" and "people under 35." 

"Let's take the first one. That's the issue of immigration, or at least it seems that's what the Democrats think it is. And yet they're the party that keeps losing Hispanics to the party of razor wire now," Maher said, referring to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott placing razor wire on the southern border at the center of a legal battle with the Biden administration. 

And then, there’s the woke nonsense:  

It’s too early, but if Trump can remain focused on Biden’s record and not talk about the 2020 election, he’ll win in a landslide. Are there enough voters to block Trump from office? Of course. But the only people who can make a Biden vote without it hurting are rich, wealthy whites along the coasts who are not the majority. Everyone else will be in clothespin vote territory, but a win is a win to me. No Democrat can win with Biden’s current levels of support among blacks, Hispanics, and young people. Factor in a large share of Muslim voters staying home in the Rust Belt, and it’s ugly—hideous for Joe Biden.



Arrogant Demands Have Consequences – Mass Exodus as U.S. Trade Staff Hit Dead Ends and Unwilling Cooperation


A story surfacing in Politico about the collapse of the office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) and the inability of the entire trade policy group to find any willing trade partners was entirely predictable.

You might remember how the insufferable U.S. business media constantly said the Trump trade team was not going to be successful because the administration was disliked by global trade partners. Every Trump trade approach from tariffs to section 301 compliance, to U.S. demands around foreign policy tied to the economic Trump Doctrine was decried by U.S. multinational corporations as too divisive, too intransigent. However, Donald Trump and his trade wolverines racked up more trade wins and established more trade agreements than any administration in history.

From KORUS (Korea/US) to the Middle East, Saudi Arabia, India, Japan, European energy deals, massive changes with China, new Ag agreements, demanded technology sector investment back in the USA, and the successful renegotiation of NAFTA (Canada, Mexico, USA) into the USMCA – all of it was stunning in scale, scope and success. Trump’s global trade success was exactly the opposite of every predictive declaration by the professional media. All of the Trump strategic policy shift created the framework for the largest domestic expansion of the U.S. economy, evident in every 2019 economic metric prior to the pandemic.

Biden took office with the full support of the lying liars who lie in the media, and they said Biden’s team was a shoo-in for success. Again, exactly the opposite has happened.

The ideological leftists who came with the Obama/Biden plan forcibly tried to push their Green New Deal policies into every trade agreement. The result and response from all U.S. trade partners has been a massive failure of epic proportions.

Despite the international pontifications around support for the globalist energy policies, ie. the “Build Back Better” bulls**t pushed by western government, the World Economic Forum and the globalists, when it comes to where the rubber hits the road no nation is willing to attach themselves to the economically destructive millstone demands of U.S trade. In material fact, many of the BBB agenda priorities are now completely rejected by the same politicians who promoted them.

In part, we in the USA are suffering through some of the most horrific inflationary economic outcomes from this Biden ‘Green New Deal’ program. Any nation that aligned itself is feeling the same impact in direct proportion to how close they followed the program. The more ‘Green’ compliant the nation, the more the economic hardship upon the citizens within that nation. This is just the non-pretending reality of the thing.

So, it doesn’t come as any great surprise to see a thoroughly rejected and dejected career trade group now walking to the exits with zero accomplishments for their last three years of effort.

WASHINGTON – Frustration with a stalled trade agenda and unhappiness with the leadership of President Joe Biden’s trade chief is pushing more than a half-dozen senior trade officials out the door, according to four current and former administration officials with knowledge of the departures.

The exits include the White House’s point person on international economics and two of the three deputy U.S. trade representatives responsible for implementing the Biden administration’s “worker-centered” trade policy.

The exodus comes after Biden’s trade agenda ran aground on multiple fronts in 2023: failing to reach a green steel and aluminum deal with the European Union and pulling out of trade talks that were part of the U.S.-crafted Indo-Pacific Economic Framework in November. The administration, meanwhile, remains internally divided on other key trade policy decisions, like how to regulate digital information flowing across the globe.

Those headwinds — and the realization that little real progress is likely to be made in an election year during which former President Donald Trump will put a glaring spotlight on trade — have convinced some officials it’s time to move on. Adding to the frustration: simmering discontent with the management practices of U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai.

[…] Biden’s “worker-centered” trade agenda was designed to smooth over frayed relations with close trading partners and win back those blue-collar workers in battleground states. But his sweeping plans to reshape global trade rules haven’t assuaged concerns from Democrats who worry that Trump will again use trade issues as a cudgel against them in the industrial Midwest — a region that could determine control of Congress and the White House in November.

That disconnect has forced USTR to freeze, abandon, or dramatically scale back its signature initiatives and negotiations, leaving some top lawmakers and staffers frustrated. In particular, Wyden and Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) are fuming that the administration hasn’t matched the Trump administration’s accomplishments on trade, like the binding labor and environmental standards that Democrats got inserted into the rewrite of NAFTA that Trump signed in 2020.

“Sen. Brown and I have consistently said that you need the kind of proposal that you saw in the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement where you open up markets for business and you have tough enforcement,” said Wyden, “and a lot of what’s been put up doesn’t meet that test.” (read more)

Go figure!….

Want success?…

Want trade deals that lift the USA economy?…

Want USA “deflation,” yes, the actual lowering of prices for goods and services?…

Want lower costs of goods, and lower prices for consumers by leveraging the size of the USA market?…

…..Get Donald Trump Back in Office!


'You Can't Dangle Carrots': Growing Number of Black Male Voters Are Fed Up With Biden's Patronization


Mike Miller reporting for RedState 

Poor Joe Biden. It's not his fault. What's he supposed to do? He's just continuing six decades of Democrat Party patronization of Black America. I wrote that with tongue planted firmly in cheek, of course. 

Setting Biden aside for a minute, the Democrat Party has pandered to black Americans for six decades, beginning with President Lyndon Johnson's disastrous War on Poverty. As Johnson declared on Jan 8, 1964, the purpose of the War on Poverty was "…not only to relieve the symptoms of poverty, but to cure it and, above all, to prevent it." Sixty years later, how'd that turn out in America's inner cities?

The ugly secret is that Democrat politicians have pandered mightily to the nation's black population, never intending to keep the hollow promises they've made, year after year, decade after decade — taking placation and appeasement to a level previously unseen. Joe Biden is continuing that tradition.

The Democrat Party has for decades masterfully convinced a majority of black Americans to just think about -- even if they (Democrats) don't keep their promises -- how worse off they'd be if they didn't have the Dems to protect them from the Republicans.

It now appears that a growing number of black voters are no longer convinced.

As reported by the Washington Post on Saturday, black male voters in Michigan are increasingly frustrated with Biden and the Democrat Party, citing the millions of dollars the administration has sent to Ukraine and calling it a "slap in the face."

Demar Byas, who lives in Pontiac, Michigan, told the Post:

If you can send $800 million to Ukraine, you can’t tell me you can’t facilitate that student loan situation whatsoever. Student loans, [and] homelessness, some of that could have been eradicated. But then we sent that money overseas.

Kerry Tolbert, another Pontiac resident, agreed with Byas. 

It’s a slap in the face [from] this administration when you watch billions go to other countries and there’s no resources for people right here.

Setting aside the issue of student loan "forgiveness," when Democrat politicians' promises, year after year, decade after decade, amount to nothing more than lip service, affected people get frustrated. Killian-Bey, 59, told the Post that the Democrat Party needed to give him substance (emphasis, mine).

You can’t dangle carrots and assume we’ll vote for you just because we don’t like the other platform.

Norman Clement, the founder of the Detroit Change Initiative, explained:

All of a sudden, at the last minute in August or September, it’s ‘Black men, can you help save us again?’ Black men are not running to the Republican Party. What they’re doing is sitting at home, doing their own thing, creating their own ecosystems and initiatives. At this point, I have no hope for Democrats to speak to our needs.

So how bad is it for Biden? Potentially terrible. Here's more:

Political analysts say Killian-Bey’s views illustrate a waning enthusiasm among Black voters, particularly Black men, toward Biden and the Democratic Party. 

A series of polls in recent months have alarmed party strategists and liberal organizers and reportedly frustrated the president, who is facing a tight race for reelection against former president Donald Trump, the Republican front-runner.

New York Times-Sienna poll in late October found that 22 percent of Black voters in six battleground states, including Michigan, would support Trump if the general election were held today, while 71 percent said they would support Biden.

Trump won the support of just 8 percent of Black voters in the 2020 election and 6 percent in 2016, according to the Pew Research Center’s validated voter study. 

Although few strategists believe Trump could get 20 percent of the Black vote in the next election, even a small uptick would spell trouble for Biden, especially in swing states with large shares of Black voters, such as Michigan, where Biden edged Trump 50.6 percent to 47.8 percent in 2020. 

A more realistic danger for Biden, political strategists say, is that dissatisfaction among some Black voters may drive them to sit out in November.

And there it is. First, even a small uptick could spell trouble for Biden in key swing states. Second, if a substantial number of black voters sit out the November election, Biden could also be toast.

Michael Tyler, the communications director for the Biden campaign, responded to the Post with typical Democrat rhetoric.

We know we can’t take any voters for granted, especially black voters, [and] young voters, who’ve been a crucial bloc for the Biden-Harris coalition. We have work to do to remind these communities of what we’ve accomplished for them in the first three years.

Uh-huh. Just like Team Biden has to "remind" the rest of America how good they've had it during the disastrous presidency of Joe Biden. Please.



Biden Regime Openly Promising to Do the Exact Thing Trump Was Accused of Doing During Impeachment Effort


President Donald J. Trump was accused of withholding U.S. military aid to Ukraine in order to force compliance with his requests.  This was the exact claim of those who attempted to impeach President Trump in 2019; this was their originating justification.

Today, NBC is reporting that Joe Biden is looking at what military aid can be withheld from Israel in order to force compliance with their requests.  I doubt the insufferable dolts in the media can see the ridiculous hypocrisy in this story.

WASHINGTON — The Biden administration is discussing using weaponry sales to Israel as leverage to convince the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to heed long-standing U.S. calls to scale back its military assault in the Gaza Strip, according to three current U.S. officials and one former U.S. official.

At the direction of the White House, the Pentagon has been reviewing what weaponry Israel has requested that could be used as leverage, said the sources. They said no decisions have been made.

The sources said Israeli officials continue to ask the administration for more weapons, including large aerial bombs, ammunition and air defenses.

After weeks of private administration requests produced fewer results than the White House wants, the sources said, the U.S. is considering slowing or pausing the deliveries in the hope that doing so will prod the Israelis to take action. (MORE)