Let Your Rabid Leftist Friends And Family Go

posted by Derek Hunter at Townhall 

The holidays are coming, and what used to be a fun time with family and friends is now, honestly, a total pain in the ass. Not because cooking is a chore or you’re not happy to see them, but because there is like one or more of them who are simply miserable leftists sour over the humiliating loss Democrats (and their self-esteem) suffered in the election. To hell with it, and them. If people are so consumed with politics that they can’t put it aside and simply be a human being, you are much better off without them in your life.

I get it, no one wants to cut off family members or lifelong friends, but better that than making your existence miserable. If they can’t set aside a political loss, screw them. 

Did you spend Thanksgiving 2020 whining endlessly about Joe Biden? Probably not. Nor did you likely spend any of the subsequent Thanksgivings lecturing the guests about how Joe was progressing down the trail of senility. 

It’s more likely that politics didn’t come up at all, because why would it? 

Unless you’re leftist drone, incapable of existing in a world where someone dares to disagree with you. 

I don’t know that I’ve ever asked anyone how they voted, I’ve either just known or didn’t care – more like it didn’t occur to me to ask. Politics has come up in conversation, obviously, but since I work in it for a living and don’t want to deal with it 24/7, I generally remain vague about what I do. I imagine it’s a bit like being a doctor who is asked what they do at a party, so they tell the guy they’re a doctor. That guy then immediately starts in on how they’ve got this pain in their side and how it hurts more when they do this, or would they mind taking a look at this other thing, etc. All the doctor wants to do is have a couple of drinks and hang out with some friends. 

Nobody wants to do more work off the clock after a day or week of work. 

It’s kind of like that when you work in politics – everyone has an opinion and wants to know what you think of whatever the big story is. Best to avoid it.

But that’s strangers; people you don’t know. Friends and family are supposed to be a respite from that. If they can’t be – they can’t just let it go and be the people they’ve always been – you’re better off without them. 

Sad as it is, it’s true. People who get their news from MSNBC are more likely to be this way – those miserable, angry people who can’t handle losing or that anyone would disagree with them. Conspiracy theorist and congenital liar Rachel Maddow has conditioned the feebleminded to believe every wild plot twist the dark recesses of the progressive dark web cooks up, and Joy Reid marinates is in racism for the self-hating white suburban crowd and anyone outside that group refusing to acknowledge their complicity in their own shortcomings and failures. 

Reid has advised these people to avoid anyone who voted differently this Thanksgiving, I say we take her up on it. Your life will be better off if you don’t burn a single calorie trying to convince one of these people, who will be compelled to tell you why they’re not coming, to come anyway. 

Honestly, at this point these people have already removed themselves from your life. In the build up to the election or at any point since Donald Trump rode down his escalator in 2015, they’ve been slowly backing away because you “think wrong.” Let them be gone. If they want to come back later, fine – there will likely be some reason an old friend needs a person they know they can trust, should they snap out of the grasp of the progressive groupthink cult. Until then, don’t waste your time.

Your life will be much more enjoyable if you don’t have anyone who would take life advice from Joy Reid, no matter how close they were. If they’re willing to do this over politics, they are defective. It’s not you, it’s them. It was always them and it was always going to be them. Trump didn’t break them, he exposed them. The leftist media broke them, and you can’t fix them. Accept that and move on. 

If they’re worth knowing they will realize the mistake they’ve made, and if they don’t they aren’t worth knowing. 

X22, And we Know, and more- Nov 24

 

Not Retribution — Truth and Reconciliation is the Way Forward

posted by Allan J. Feifer at American Thinker 

The Apartheid government of South Africa fell in 1995. 

The country faced an existential question:  How to reconcile the two sides in such a way that blacks got the justice they believed they deserved without destroying the economic heart of the country that the whites largely built and controlled. 

A secondary goal was to stem the loss of whites leaving the country with their institutional knowledge and capital. 

The Allies, after World War II, held trials for the war crimes of both the Japanese and Germans.  

South Africa instead created the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) to allow people to "confess" their wrongdoing without jailing or executing many people and as their means to heal the country. 

TRC was the beginning of a progressive term — restorative justice.  Some liked the idea of a public catharsis.  Still, it did little to assuage the fears of whites who, to this day, are targets of government retribution, nationalization, redistribution, and pernicious crime that the government doesn't seem interested in.

Seventy-six million Trump voters also voted for change, many voting for radical change.  How do we move forward when, as a country, we are not on the same page, with some out for blood after the tyrannical Biden years? 

I have a friend I call the Queen, who did not vote for Trump and is scared to death for her children and herself.  While she can't articulate her concerns factually except through rhetoric, she represents millions who don't understand the need for change, much less radical change. 

That's why I believe we need the equivalent of a TRC here in America, in a different form that doesn't personalize or focus on individuals but instead exposes to all the means and methods of the policies that permeate government and that act like tightly applied brakes on our society while further dividing us.  Without releasing those brakes, we fall further behind other more energetic and enabling economies as we apply the wrong focus here at home.

President Trump's newly created DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) is not an entirely new idea. But with Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy at the helm, it gives the idea the high-octane gas that previous commissions did not have. 

Yet, something is missing.  That something missing is the "why" of the mission to change our government fundamentally. 

Without that explanation, it may seem to many as political payback that, in the end, will hurt people the government is supposed to help.  At least, that's the vision of some 73 million Harris supporters. 

DOGE is likely to be successful in a practical sense.  Still, it will fail if the American people don't understand that the fundamental mission of DOGE is to rationalize our economic system in a world of competition and, at other times, cooperation.  

There is a reckoning coming between the America Firsters and the free traders who misunderstand the world's interconnectedness and why we can't have the strongest military in the world waiting menacingly at our shorelines for an invasion that will never come even as we face decisive defeat almost everywhere else. 

Unless we realize what's at stake, we will likely find ourselves defeated socially and economically bypassed by a more clever strategy. 

I am in lockstep agreement with virtually all of Trump's stated objectives.  What's missing is that we must convince many of Trump's adversaries that without Trump's agenda, we are currently on a losing path and therefore must adjust course to obtain glory, justice, treasure, and peace. 

A secondary goal must be to share how if America can obtain these goals, the entire world benefits, the same way it did from the 1800s until about 1975.  Millions of Americans, through a failed educational system, have no idea how much our country contributed to a free and predominantly prosperous world and are the heroes and not the villains.

We now face the same issues that South Africa confronted after a long, violent, and unfair system of government. 

Resource-rich South Africa is now an economically failed country living off the accomplishments of its Apartheid regime. 

Like South Africa, we have yet to accept that the social element of the three-legged stool, which includes social, economic, and governmental practices, is a first among equals. 

Without our citizens behind major shifts in policy, failure is a near certainty.  Would we have been able to win WWII without the absolute support of the American people? 

No.

The mechanics of fitting that first leg to our stool are much less daunting than commonly supposed. 

First, we must understand that the difference between propaganda and persuasion is not a fine line; it is the difference between truth, supported by facts vs. lies, spun believably and directed at individuals devoid of an ability to tell the difference apart. 

If the people don't believe that our government is a reliable, truth-telling, non-partisan purveyor of facts and information, all is lost. 

People will always gravitate towards the truth because it is consistent, understandable, and positive.  They'll never forgive a leader who equivocates, parses, withholds, or otherwise attempts to manipulate the truth in a manner most favorable to their aspirations.

Biden lost his credibility through his own words and deeds and that of his supporters, who could not convey authenticity to millions.  As stated by his press secretary, Joe Biden running circles around his staff was a blatant lie, and he and his cabal were punished for it.  Harris broke no new ground in her highly scripted word salad style of communication.  The American people roundly rejected her for cause.

Donald Trump has the American people's attention and commands the moment.  How he delivers his message, the need for specific changes, and the missteps we took in the past will be our Truth and Reconciliation; let's not be shy about trumpeting it.  

God bless America.

🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 

man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 

Sen. Joni Ernst Highlights Nine Examples Of Washington Waste In ‘Caturday’ Campaign

Ernst highlighted nine examples in her social media campaign that illustrate how the federal government blows through taxpayer money.

Tristan Justice reporting for The Federalist

The senator who pledged to make bureaucrats “squeal” is making them hiss.

On Saturday, Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, launched a “Caturday” campaign on social media to expose nine examples of Washington waste, including a government-funded study on eating cats in Madagascar.

“Just like cats, waste in Washington has nine lives,” Ernst told The Federalist in an exclusive statement.

President-elect Donald Trump has pledged to appoint Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to lead a new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to eliminate waste throughout the federal government. On Thursday, Ramaswamy announced he was starting a podcast with Musk to launch the administrative effort and will call the new program “Dogecast.”

“Elon and I are going to start a separate track of ‘Dogecasts’ that explain exactly what we’re doing to the public to provide transparency on what is a once-in-a-generation project,” Ramaswamy said in a video posted to YouTube. “We want to bring the public along with us. To lift the curtain, to take us behind the scenes of what that waste, fraud and abuse in government looks like.”

Ernst highlighted nine examples topping at least $9.7 million in her weekend social media campaign she says illustrate how the federal government blows through taxpayer money.

“I am working paw in paw with the Trump administration, Elon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy, and DOGE to claw back tax dollars from the fat cats and get Americans feline good that Washington is finally starting to work for them again,” Ernst told The Federalist.

The senator’s first example is a $6.8 million dollar study by the National Science Foundation to assess what toys, foods, scents, and humans cats prefer. Researchers examined a group of 50 cats, five of which were uncooperative, and reported whichever option the participant animals spent the most time engaging with was that cat’s preference. Cats picked tuna over chicken, moving toys over stationary toys, and catnip over gerbils.

“Good news: they like tuna, catnip, playing with humans, and moving toys,” Ernst reported. “Bad news: we aren’t within a whisker of all the waste.”

Her second example was a $178,000 “Catwalk” study wherein officials with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) “put 10 cats on a catwalk and another on a treadmill to study how they balance.”

Her third example cited a $390,000 study commissioned to answer the question, “how many shakes does it take for a wet cat to dry off.”

Ernst’s fourth example was a $331,000 investigation into whether cats or elephants urinate faster.

“It turns out it was a tie!” the senator reported. “18 seconds for these speed demons.”

“And, who could forget the time @NIH spent $1.3 million treating cats to a pawsh day at the spa with treats and classical music to see if they pooped outside the litter box less,” Ernst wrote in the following post.

Other studies examined the appeal of “cute kittens on the internet,” whether cats could still walk on treadmills after the deletion of brain function, and how cats and mice interact when glowing in the dark.

“It would be a cat-astrope to let this purrplexing spending spree continue,” Ernst said.

Trump’s Victory Ushers in a Historic Counterrevolution - Victor Davis Hanson

 Despite being the target of Democrat lawfare for years, a defiant Trump promised to end an open border, illegal immigration, rising crime, and soaring prices.

We are witnessing a historic counterrevolution after President Trump’s victory, far different from his first election in 2016.

The orthodox and the supposed scripted future are now suspect. And they are likely to be dethroned — from the trivial to the existential.

Critics claim Trump has no mandate to stage such a counterrevolution. They argue that he did not win 51 percent of the popular vote or achieve a Reaganesque landslide in the Electoral College.

Yet all the initiatives he advanced and won on polled landslide public approval.

Despite being the target of Democrat lawfare for years, a defiant Trump promised to end an open border, illegal immigration, rising crime, and soaring prices. He pledged to slash the government and its administrative state, terminate racial and gender identity politics, and restore deterrence abroad.

The people overwhelmingly wanted those messages but were waiting for an unorthodox messenger who would actually deliver them.

The Trump messenger reassured weary citizens that they were not crazy.

Instead, they had good cause to be sick of being talked down to by a press, academic, bureaucratic, and political elite that never earned nor deserved such self-appointed status.

The FBI, the CIA, and the DOJ, not the large crowds at rallies, were the ones truly out of control.

President Biden was really suffering from dementia, not those who said he was.

Criminals with weapons are as deleterious to society as law-abiding citizens deprived of them.

It is not a thought crime to believe there are two sexes — not three or four or more. No one should be forced to buy an electric vehicle, disconnect their natural gas stove, or submit to racial or gender indoctrination sessions.

Americans should speak their minds and write what they wish without worry of being censored, blacklisted, ostracized, doxxed, or shadow-banned — or jailed.

Campuses are not oases of tolerance, disinterested inquiry, and free expression. They instead increasingly became overpriced indoctrination centers that shred the Constitution and graduate indebted students who know less — but are far more biased — than when they enrolled.

Trump and his MAGA appointees promise to slash more than a trillion dollars from the annual federal budget, disbanding entire agencies.

Is the objection that an ever-expanding government — $37 trillion in debt, running nearly $2 trillion in annual deficits — should keep growing?

Trump pledges to reform the Pentagon — ending DEI Pentagon commissars and revolving-door corporate generalship.

He vows to hold the four-star class responsible for the catastrophe in Afghanistan and to reenlist soldiers who were driven out due to draconian vaccination mandates or woke intolerance. Trump envisions changing the entire system of military procurement.

Does the status quo object on the grounds that our military leadership has been winning our wars abroad?

Is the Pentagon currently awash in eager recruits?

Has it stockpiled a huge surplus of shells, bombs, and rockets?

Trump promises historic deportations of the 12 million who destroyed the southern border and surged in without health or criminal audits.

Trump vows to rescue swamped social services and stop crimes by illegal alien felons.

Is that really worse than the Biden administration’s original importation of millions of illegal aliens, empowered by drug-importing and sex-trafficking cartels?

Who are the culpable? Those flagrantly mocking and breaking the law, or those vowing to enforce it?

Trump says he will deter enemies without bogging America down in “endless wars” — and did just that in his first four years as president.

Is the current alternative preferable to convincing enemies that there are few consequences to their aggression, sandbagging allies like Israel, or feeding the war in Ukraine without any plan of either winning or ending it?

The Trump revolution is also cultural and social. Shared class interests have replaced race, ethnicity, and gender chauvinism.

Athletes of all races are no longer taking a knee in protest of America’s supposed systemic racism during the national anthem. Sometimes they celebrate their scoring by doing honorific Trump YMCA/golf-swing dances on national television.

Enlistments to help craft the Trump counterrevolution are not always predicated on degrees, conventional resumes, or past lengthy government service. Race and gender do not determine qualifications alone. Nor does class.

Common sense, successful lives outside of government, and a desire to end the current nonsense count instead as better prerequisites.

For Trump, party identification, titles, and traditional prestige matter less as he is surrounded by an ideologically diverse cadre including Elon Musk, Robert Kennedy, Jr., Dana White, Tulsi Gabbard, and Joe Rogan.

The country no longer must apologize incessantly for its past or present but can move on — content that it need not be perfect to be better than all the alternatives.

The age of flashing pronouns, renaming iconic landmarks, statue toppling, trashing the dead, vandalizing with impunity the campus library, or spouting antisemitic venom is passing.

So, another name for the Trump counterrevolution is a simple return to sanity.

https://www.nysun.com/article/trumps-victory-ushers-in-a-historic-counterrevolution

An Interesting Changing Happening on Gun Owner Demographics

Tom Knighton reporting for Townhall 

I don't want gun ownership to be strictly along partisan lines. The reason? If that's what happens, then gun rights stays a partisan issue and we will have to worry about what happens when the political pendulum shifts. After all, we came out of four years of constant threat to our gun rights and while we are probably safe for the next four years, if not more, we can't guarantee what will happen after that.

So the demographics of gun owners matter. After all, gun owners tend to become gun voters, which means we need gun owners from across the political spectrum.

The problem is that based on this report, the news is both good and bad.

Gun ownership in the United States has remained steady at about 31% over the past several years, but beneath this stability lies a sharp increase in ownership among Republican women, offsetting declines among Democratic and independent men.

This shift underscores the growing influence of political affiliation on gun ownership decisions.

According to a recent Gallup analysis of gun ownership trends from 2007 to 2024, the percentage of Republican women who own firearms has risen significantly. Between 2007 and 2012, 19% of Republican women reported owning a gun. That figure has jumped to 33% in the 2019-2024 period.

In contrast, gun ownership among Democratic men has dropped by seven percentage points, now at 29%, while ownership among independent men has fallen by five points to 39%. Republican men continue to lead all demographic and political subgroups, with 60% reporting personal gun ownership.

Shrinking Gender Gap, Growing Partisan Divide

Gun ownership remains more common among men (43%) than women (20%), but the gender gap has narrowed. From 2007-2012, the gap was 30 percentage points; by 2019-2024, it had decreased to 23 points as more women—particularly Republican women—report owning firearms.

Meanwhile, the partisan divide in gun ownership has grown. In 2007-2012, 38% of Republicans and 22% of Democrats owned guns, a 16-point difference. By 2019-2024, that gap had nearly doubled to 28 points, with 47% of Republicans and 19% of Democrats owning guns.

So the overall rate has largely remained unchanged, but Republican women gun owners are growing significantly while liberal and independent men owning guns are shrinking. Democratic women gun owners are also down, but only by about one point, and it's still higher among them than it was between 2007 and 2012...by about a point.

Overall, the increase in gun ownership by Republican women resulted in a five percentage point increase for women across the board, while male gun ownership has dropped two percent overall.

But the drop in Democrat and Independent gun owners is troubling because it means at least some politicians are going to feel more emboldened to push for gun control and with lower gun ownership outside of the GOP, a particularly clever candidate might be able to shift opinions on gun control enough to make it important and a driving factor in some people's choice of candidates.

I love the idea of more women owning guns, regardless of their affiliation--please don't get me wrong there--but I'd really just like to see a world where the threat to our right to keep and bear arms was non-existent.

That's only going to happen with an expansion of the gun-owning demographics into groups that typically don't favor gun ownership. I mean, there are some out there who will own guns while thinking you shouldn't own guns, but I believe that they're the exception. I also don't think they'll stay that way indefinitely.

The right to keep and bear arms is a right for everyone. I only wish more people understood that, took advantage of it, and stopped trying to interfere with our right to keep and bear arms.

Oh, So *Now* the Dems Like the Filibuster

Ward Clark reporting for RedState 

It's something of an understatement to say that Democrats woke up the morning of November 6th to find their world taking a very different shape. Not only did the resurgent Donald Trump and his bright, young understudy JD Vance crush the Harris/Walz ticket in an overwhelming electoral victory, but they also crushed it in the total vote count and crashed through the Rust Belt "Blue Wall" like the Kool-Aid Man. Not only that, but the GOP will go into the next Congress with control of the House of Representatives and the Senate.

And so it's no surprise that the Democrats in the Senate are suddenly rediscovering their love for the filibuster:

Soon to be in the minority, Democrats are ready to use whatever tactics are at their disposal to put up roadblocks for Republicans and President-elect Donald Trump — including the 60-vote threshold many have long sought to abolish.

“I’d be lying if I said we’d be in a better position without the filibuster,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) said. “We have a responsibility to stop autocratic and long-headed [sic] abuse of power or policy, and we’ll use whatever tools we have available. We’re not going to fight this battle with one hand tied behind our back.”

Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) sees the filibuster as “part of the calculation” to how Democrats will spearhead resistance next Congress in a chamber with a 53-47 GOP majority.

“We had to live with it when we were in the majority,” he said.

When worn on the other foot, the shoe pinches.

While it's fun to point out Democrat hypocrisy here, and yes, some schadenfreude is in order, we are forced to acknowledge that the Democrats are awakening to the reality of the hand they have been dealt, and are going to play with the rules that are in place. And now, it may be the GOP that gets frustrated by the use of the filibuster to block Republican agenda items.

That's how the game is played, and there's a good reason for things being the way they are. The Senate is supposed to be the cooling saucer for the passions of the House, thus the long-standing tradition of requiring 60 votes to break debate, rather than a simple minority. The filibuster prevents excess, no matter which party is in charge.

And, no doubt, there will be some calls from the right to amend or eliminate the filibuster out of frustration. Those calls should be ignored. The filibuster is in place for a good reason, and the Senate GOP and activists on the right must remember that sooner or later, that shoe will be back on that same foot, the Republicans will be in the minority once again, and they will make good use of the filibuster to keep things to some semblance of sanity. That's a pendulum that never stops swinging.

But that doesn't mean we can't enjoy the moment, and perhaps point and giggle at the Democrats who are suddenly rediscovering the value of the very tool they wanted to eliminate - before November 5th.

Fun side note: The term "filibuster" also carries the meaning of a person "who engages in an unauthorized military expedition into a foreign country or territory to foster or support a political revolution or secession." The term "freebooter" also applies. There's probably a cautionary note in there somewhere.

Could the Democrats Still Put Kamala in the White House?

Ward Clark reporting for RedState 

Could it happen? Could the Democrats manage to land Kamala Harris in the White House, and not just for a few weeks?

National treasure Dr. Victor Davis Hanson sees a way for them to do that - but it would be an act of pure desperation. 

A video of Biden on Tuesday went viral online after the president appeared to wander off a designated path following his speech on climate issues in the Amazon rainforest. On “The Victor Davis Hanson Show,” the senior fellow noted how Harris had flip-flopped on left-wing policies she had advocated for prior to 2020, claiming she was now returning to her “left-wing self” following her loss to President-elect Donald Trump.

“But my point about all of this is twofold. He is the president. He told everybody what he wanted to do. He was criticized severely in the campaign for being too provocative, but the point is that was unlike Kamala Harris,” Hanson said. “She said everything that she said emphatically as a leftist. Fracking? ‘Of course I’m gonna ban it.’ She went out in demonstrations, no deportation, no deportation. Guns? She didn’t just say I want to, ‘I want to buy back guns. I’ll go into their house and get them,’ she said. Then she flipped.”

That's a fair point; nobody with enough brains to pound sand believed any of Kamala Harris's suddenly moderated views on, well, anything. But Dr. Hanson goes on to describe a process by which the Democrats could preclude Trump:

Hanson went on to state how he believes Democrats would attempt to jail Trump through one of his indictments and have Biden step down from his seat in order to hand it over to Harris.

“I said that they would probably try to put Trump in jail and Joe Biden was deteriorating at a geometric rate, would probably be la-la land, and then there would be calls to make her president. Then she would be acculturated for 60 days and then the Left would, that would give the left time enough,” Hanson said.

“Like this crazy representative Raskin or somebody, ‘Wow, the 14th Amendment, He’s like an extra. He’s just like a Confederate general. He tried to start a civil war, so he can’t hold a federal office. We’re gonna go to court and we’ll get a judge and we’ll stay,'” Hanson added. “I really believe they’re gonna do that. I say there’s a 30% chance that Joe will be, he might not be able to finish his term the next two months.”

Look, I admire and respect Dr. Hanson as I do few people. He's one of the smartest people on the planet, he's forgotten more classical history than most people will ever know. He literally is a national treasure, and his word on anything should be taken seriously.

But while he's right about Jamie Raskin (D-MD) being an unhinged nut, I think he overestimates the Democrat's inclinations to do this. While I wouldn't put it past Raskin to claim that Donald Trump "tried to start a civil war" - he didn't - even for today's Democratic Party, he's on the loony fringe. There appears to be little enthusiasm among Democrats in Congress or in what's left of the Biden administration to attempt something that is this obviously desperate.

Even so, Dr. Hanson may well be right on the second part of that. Joe Biden's deterioration appears to be accelerating at a logarithmic rate. It's a matter of national security at this point and, candidly, has been so for some time, and there is a very real danger that someone who wishes the United States ill may well try something while the National Command Authority is in the hands of a doddering old fool who is and has been non compos mentis for some time. Joe Biden should have resigned some time ago, even if that means putting Kamala Harris in the driver's seat for a few weeks.

Even if that happens, even if she gets to make the historic claim of being the first Madam President, she will still vacate the Oval Office on January 20th - and Donald Trump will then be the 48th President of the United States.

♦️𝐖³𝐏 𝐃𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝

 

W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

posted by DarkGoldenMan

Welcome to the W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Post whatever you got in the comments section below.

This feature will post every day at 6:30am Mountain time.