Friday, July 5, 2024

They Lied to You


Lying is certainly nothing new in politics. It is said that prostitution is the world's oldest profession, but politics is assuredly the dirtiest -- filthier even than garbageman, mortician or, well, the world's oldest profession itself.

Former President Bill Clinton (while we're on the topic of sexual promiscuity) perjured himself, leading to his impeachment. Former President Barack Obama, in what PolitiFact called its 2013 "Lie of the Year," promised that "if you like your health care plan, you can keep it." And on and on it goes.

The corporate media, whose 21st-century raison d'etre is propping up the Regime Party (Democrats) and punishing the Deplorable Party (Republicans), often joins the fray. The Russia-collusion delusion disinformation operation was laundered by Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign to seedy "intelligence" firm Fusion GPS and law firm Perkins Coie LLP. For years, the corporate media then dutifully pushed the false narrative. Indeed, it is unclear to this day whether MSNBC has ever read the Mueller report.

But after last Thursday's CNN presidential debate in Atlanta, in which President Joe Biden delivered a catastrophic performance for the ages, there is only one conclusion: The yearslong effort by Biden administration flunkies, Democratic Party poohbahs and pro-Regime media stenographers to forcefully deny Biden's obvious physical and mental decline will go down as the single greatest lie in American history.

And what an assiduous effort it was. For years, Democrats and the corporate media lied through their teeth about the blatant decline of the president's physical and mental faculties.

When Biden fell off a stationary bicycle in 2022, handlers brushed it off as no big deal. When Biden started wearing funny-looking tennis sneakers instead of dress shoes, presumably in order to stabilize his gait and prevent debilitating falls, aides informed us that Biden was just embracing a certain sartorial savviness.

When former Special Counsel Robert Hur declined to pursue charges against Biden due to the fact he "would likely present himself to a jury ... as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory," media apparatchiks denounced Hur as a "Trump plant" in the Justice Department. (Where is Hur's apology?)

After multiple videos emerged of Biden freezing, staring and wandering off, The New York Times called them "misleading"; the Biden White House dismissed them as "cheap fakes." The Wall Street Journal's recent story in which reporters interviewed 45 officials who expressed concern about Biden's senescence was excoriated as a "hit job."

All along the way, costly "gaffes" -- such as Biden inadvertently calling for regime change in Moscow during a March 2022 visit to Warsaw -- were simply chalked up to Uncle Joe being Uncle Joe. How dare you question hardscrabble Joe from Scranton: nothing to see here!

Anything -- anything -- to prevent the American people from learning the truth. Axios reported last Friday how "close aides have carefully shielded (Biden) from people inside and outside the White House since the beginning of his presidency." For Democrats and their media enablers, there can be no stone left unturned to protect their precious. The ends always justify the means, after all, just as Saul Alinsky taught.

The media's hubris in thinking it could get away with this is astounding. Biden is the president of the United States. His decline wasn't exactly a state secret, at least for anyone with functioning eyes and ears. This column two years ago, in lamenting Biden's "indications of a palpable senility," concluded that "[t]here is something very, very clearly wrong with the president of the United States."

Really, just how stupid do Democrats and the corporate media think we are? How long did they think they could get away with this gaslighting operation?

A Gallup poll last October revealed that 32% of Americans trust the corporate media either "a great deal" or "a fair amount." That seems far too high. These hacks deserve nothing but disgust and contempt.

Nor has the persistent media gaslighting for the past two to three years been a victimless crime. The collective victim is us: all of us. America is wildly insecure under the "leadership" of Biden. Xi Jinping is sure to move on Taiwan before year's end. Who knows what Xi's friends, from Pyongyang to Moscow to Tehran, might do. Who will stop them, after all?

The ultimate irony of it all? The massive lie and disinformation operation to obfuscate the president's decline has been perpetrated in the name of -- you guessed it -- "our democracy." The chutzpah!

"Democracy Dies in Darkness," reads The Washington Post's masthead slogan, conveniently adopted mere weeks after former President Donald Trump took office in 2017. Come again? We don't actually know who is running the country right now. It certainly isn't Uncle Joe. Now that is some serious "darkness."

Never forgive, and never forget, what these lying miscreants have done to us -- and to the republic.



🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓


Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


🌲Exciting news from Great American Family!

 


Source: https://itsawonderfulmovie.blogspot.com/2024/07/great-american-family-announces-new.html

I have some very exciting news, everyone, that will have you singing "Jingle Bells, Jingle Bells, Jingle All the Way"!

Great American Family has announced Candace Cameron Bure will get a second Christmas movie on their network this year, and her co-star is fan-favorite, Cameron Mathison! See their movie title below.

Casey Elliott, who stars in the Destined at Christmas movies and is a member of the singing group Gentri, will also star in a Christmas movie for the network this year. His co-star is Kristin Wollet of County Rescue. See their movie title below.

And more good news, speaking of County Rescue, the television series that focuses on service to others and faith, will return to Great American Family next year in 2025!

Brittany Underwood and Jonathan Stoddard will be paired together again this holiday season in another royal-themed Christmas movie on Great American Family. Perhaps this is a sequel to their film last year, A Royal Christmas Holiday. See their new movie title below.

Also, two more Christmas movie titles were announced without names attached, yet, to these projects. See titles below.


New Great American Family Christmas Movies:

Jingle Bells, Wedding Bells
starring Candace Cameron Bure and Cameron Mathison

A Wreathmaker Christmas
starring Casey Elliott and Kristin Wollet

A Royal Christmas Ballet
starring Brittany Underwood and Jonathan Stoddard

Christmas in Scotland
starring ?

Little Women Christmas
starring ?


Stay tuned for more details! I'm sure Great American Family will provide more information on these movies during Christmas in July.

Also, I must say, I am rather excited to see Candace Cameron Bure and Cameron Mathison paired together for a new Christmas movie! I think they will be spectacular together, and I love that Candace is getting TWO Christmas movies on Great American Family this year. Even with all of Hallmark's talent, Lacey Chabert had two Christmas films last year for their channel, and I wouldn't be surprised if she also has two this year.

 
Also, I'm delighted to officially share that Casey Elliott will have a new Christmas movie on GFAM this year. We already know he will star in a third installment of the Destined at Christmas films next year with Shae Robins. I think Casey is such a wonderful actor and singer, and I'm beyond thrilled to see him return again this year! And, yes, I'm hoping we might hear him sing in this new movie, even if it's just a little!

As for the movie titles with no names attached, yet, I have some guesses, but we'll see. Trevor Donovan's Christmas movie has yet to be announced. Could one of these be his? Or, Jen Lilley, Jillian Murray, and so on???

Please share your thoughts in the comments below!



Have a Merry Day!
Net

Labour Wins Landslide Victory in UK Election

15 government ministers lost seats following a surge for Reform UK.

Sir Keir Starmer will become British prime minister, with Labour winning 412 seats in Parliament in a general election landslide victory.

ADDENDUM:

Keir Starmer was knighted in 2014 for his services to criminal justice. He received the honor for his work as the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) and head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) between 2008 and 2013.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/labour-win-landslide-victory-in-uk-election-5680160?utm_source=debrief_sample_paid&utm_campaign=WD_article_2024-07-05-ca&utm_medium=email&est=d73bkbFw2kptPNq%2FUJtKRUJlPhpp93dZUdgx9hJSwhiEedkvmymun2yddD9oKNNvkULO

All but two of the 650 seats have now been declared.

Labour gained 211 seats overall. In his victory speech, Sir Keir said: “We did it. Change begins now ... We are ready to restore Britain to the service of working people.”

The Labour Party passed the majority threshold of 326 at around 5 a.m. just after Prime Minister Rishi Sunak conceded defeat, having clung on to his own seat.

Mr. Sunak has led the Conservatives to a defeat which could see them win their lowest number of seats in the history of the party.

In 1997 the Tories were reduced to 165 seats, but their worst ever result was in 1906 when they won just 156 seats.

So far they have won only 121 seats.

Mr. Sunak, who held on to his own seat at Richmond and Northallerton, said at the count, “The British people have delivered a sobering verdict ... and I take responsibility for that.”

He said Labour had clearly won the election and he had already rung Sir Keir and congratulated him, and he also apologised to all the Tory candidates who lost.

The Labour leader told a crowd of cheering supporters, “a mandate like this comes with a great responsibility.”

Starmer Calls for ‘National Renewal’

Sir Keir said, “Our task is nothing less than renewing the ideas that hold this country together, national renewal, whoever you are, wherever you started in life, if you work hard, if you play by the rules, this country should give you a air chance to get on, it should always respect your contributions, and we have to restore that.”

Reform UK saw a surge in its vote, helping it to win four seats with leader Nigel Farage, in Clacton, and party Chairman Richard Tice, in Boston, both being elected.

The Green Party won more than a million votes nationwide and won three more seats, ousting Labour’s Thangam Debonnaire in Bristol Central, and gaining Waverley Valley and North Herefordshire from the Tories.

The Liberal Democrats have won 71 seats, while in Scotland the SNP lost heavily, with Labour gaining 37 seats off the Scottish nationalists.

The SNP’s leader at Westminster, Stephen Flynn, said the party’s candidates had been overcome by the “Starmer tsunami” and he said it was no reflection on them as people.

Other key results saw Jeremy Corbyn, who was ejected from the Labour Party after refusing to accept a key report on anti-Semitism under his leadership, retained his Islington North seat as an independent.

In Rochdale, George Galloway of the Workers’ Party lost the seat he won at a by-election earlier this year, with Labour’s Paul Waugh, a political journalist, winning back the seat.

Mordaunt Says ‘Democracy Is Never Wrong’

For the Tories, it was a massive turnaround since December 2019, when Boris Johnson won an 80-seat Conservative majority after promising to “get Brexit done.”

Among the Cabinet ministers losing their seats were the leader of the House of Commons, Penny Mordaunt, who said, “Democracy is never wrong.”

In her speech after losing Portsmouth North to Labour’s Amanda Martin, she said: “Tonight, the Conservative Party has taken a battering because it failed to honour the trust that people had placed in it. You can speak all you like of security and freedom, but you can’t have either if you are afraid.”

“Afraid about the cost-of-living or accessing health care, or whether the responsibility you shoulder will be recognised and rewarded. That fear steals the future, and it only makes the present matter and that is why we lost,” she added.

She also warned, “Our renewal as a party and a country will not be achieved by us talking to an ever smaller slice of ourselves but being guided by the people of our country.”

Defence Secretary Grant Shapps lost his seat in Welwyn Hatfield, as did Justice Secretary Alex Chalk in Cheltenham, and Education Secretary Michelle Keegan in Chichester.

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt hung on to his seat in Godalming and Ash by just 891 votes.

Mr. Hunt described it as a “crushing victory” and said the Tories needed to have the “humility” to ask themselves what they had done wrong.

He wished the Labour government well and said he hoped they would be able to make the reforms to the NHS, which “the Conservative Party often finds difficult to do.”

Home Secretary James Cleverly also retained his seat after what he described as a “painful” night for the Conservatives.

In a rare setback for Labour, shadow paymaster general Jonathan Ashworth lost in Leicester South to an independent, Shockat Adam, who stood on a strongly pro-Palestinian platform.

This article has being updated with latest seat declaration numbers, and will be updated further.

PA Media contributed to this report.


Harriet Hagemen Eviscerates Joe Biden and the Pretending all Around Him


Harriet Hageman is on my personal short list of people I hope President Trump is considering for vice president.

During a recent interview Hageman shows she is not going along with the pretending.  Every word about Joe Biden and the length of time the issues have been visible is correct and accurate. “Who is running our country?” WATCH:



The full interview is below:

On “Forbes Newsroom,” Rep. Harriet Hageman (R-WY) reacted to President Biden’s debate performance with alarm, slamming the press for its coverage of Biden, questioning who is running the U.S., and whether she supports invoking the 25th Amendment.



Meanwhile in Delaware: The Battle of 'Supplemental Authority' Rages On in Hunter Biden's Gun Case


Susie Moore reporting for RedState 

The June conviction of First Son Hunter Biden on gun charges in federal court in Delaware came as a surprise not because the evidence didn't seem to support his guilt but because of the venue and his last name. 

That a jury of 12 of Hunter's "peers" unanimously opted to hold him accountable for lying on a federal firearms form to procure a gun he was prohibited from possessing due to his ongoing drug/addiction issues carried some added schadenfreude in two respects: 1) it came just weeks after former President Donald Trump, his father's chief political opponent, was convicted in Manhattan on specious business fraud charges; 2) his father has long been one of the loudest proponents of "gun control" and measures like the very statutes under which Hunter convicted.

And in a rather ironic legal twist, some recent legal rulings from the very Supreme Court that President Joe Biden has repeatedly railed against for being "extremist" may wind up aiding in Hunter's efforts to overturn his conviction. 

As we reported previously, the day after the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Snyder v. United States, Hunter's legal team filed a "Notice of Supplemental Authority" in the Delaware District Court where he was convicted and where Judge Maryellen Noreika is considering his Motion(s) for Acquittal and Motion for New Trial. Their argument is essentially that a similar analysis of the statutory language under which Biden was charged raises the same issues as the Supreme Court found in Snyder, namely that the language is vague and fails to give "fair notice" to a would-be defendant as to what specific conduct is prohibited by the statute. 


Hunter Biden's Legal Team Makes Swift Use of Supreme Court Decision


Following that, on July 1, the prosecution filed its response to Biden's Notice of Supplemental Authority, in which it contended that "The Supreme Court’s decision in Snyder has no connection to the factual or legal issues before this Court." Further, the prosecution contends, Biden waived his right to raise the issue of vagueness by failing to raise it in his initial Motion for Acquittal. 

Then, on July 2, the prosecution filed its own Notice of Supplemental Authority, in which it notes that the Supreme Court has now vacated and remanded the Fifth Circuit's ruling in United States v. Daniels (on which Biden relied "extensively" in his Motion for Acquittal) for further consideration in light of the Court's recent ruling in United States v. Rahimi

While the Fifth Circuit held, in Daniels, that § 922(g)(3) (the same provision under which Hunter was convicted) was unconstitutional as applied to a recreational marijuana user, the Supreme Court's order remanding the case indicates "that the Fifth and Third circuits incorrectly applied this standard and provide additional support for the conclusion that § 922(g)(3) is constitutional as applied to the defendant in this case," per the Government. 

But wait — there's more! On July 3, Hunter's team responded to the Government's Notice of Supplemental Authority, essentially pooh-poohing the significance of the Supreme Court's granting of certiorari, then vacating and remanding lower court decisions on related issues. Hunter's lawyers insist that these aren't decisions on the merits and further point out that several other "GVRs" issued by the Court on the same day involved lower court decisions that had, in fact, rejected Second Amendment claims. They criticize the Government's expansive reading of Rahimi and, for added measure, point out that this seems to run counter the Supreme Court's decision in Bruen.

The Special Counsel’s suggestion that Rahimi, coupled with the GVRs, means Section 922(g)(3) is close enough to the Founding Era precedents identified in Rahimi to be upheld tracks the very argument that was rejected in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022). Rahimi and Bruen are bookends to the relevance of Founding Era surety laws.

So, at this point, we have a rolling gun battle (figuratively speaking and no pun intended, of course) between Joe Biden's Department of Justice, which is trying to uphold a conviction of his son under gun control measures of the sort Joe Biden has long championed, and his son's legal team, which is zealously championing the Second Amendment. And they are using recent rulings from the Supreme Court Joe Biden has repeatedly excoriated as ammo. 

Ya gotta love American jurisprudence!



Ari Emanuel Gives Donor Perspective on Status of Team Around Joe Biden



Ari Zev Emanuel is the owner of UFC and WWE organizations.  He’s also the brother of Obama’s former Chief of Staff and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, and the brother of bioethicist Ezekiel Emanuel from Obamacare fame (“we relied upon the stupidity of the American voter.”).

The Emanuel brothers are the three sons of Benjamin M. Emanuel, who was active in the Irgun, a Zionist paramilitary group in the 1930’s and 40’s.

All three brothers are deeply connected to the network of the professional Democrat political system, and by consequence to the Obama majority faction within the Democrat party apparatus.  In addition to being the insider’s ‘insider’, Ari Emanuel is also a major donor and substantive influence agent.

When Hollywood donors like Ari Emanuel speak, the Democrat party board members listen very closely.  {Direct Rumble Link}  In this recent event, Ari Emanuel gives his opinion of Joe Biden and the team surrounding Biden.  Ari Emanuel doesn’t pull any punches; he doesn’t need to.  Remember, Ari is in alignment with the Barack Obama element of the Democrat apparatus.  WATCH:



Joe Biden is no longer a “candidate,” he is currently the Democrat “nominee” due to prior party voting to avoid the Ohio deadline issue.   Biden isn’t the presumptive nominee, he’s the actual nominee.  As a result, Ari Emanuel talks about the Biden replacement process through the prism of the legal maneuvers still available to the party.

Without directly saying it, Ari Emanuel is telling Joe Biden that he needs to resign and remove the legal hurdles that exist from his status as the Democrat presidential nominee.   Watch this nuance carefully, because this seems to be the most obvious direction that most are not discussing.

Joe Biden is going to have to resign the presidency and decline the 2024 nomination.  That background reality is why the tip-top of the Democrat power pyramid are paying very close attention.



Why Nobel Laureates Opposing Trump’s Economic Policies Is A Ringing Endorsement


If the laureates understood the difference between academic theory and policy practice, they would not have issued their silly letter.



In late June, 16 Nobel economists led by former World Bank Chief Economist Joseph Stiglitz issued a letter warning that a second Trump term would have “a negative impact on America’s economic standing in the world and a destabilizing effect on the U.S. domestic economy.” Among the gripes: Trump’s “fiscally irresponsible” budget plans and the “vagaries of his actions and policies” in relations with other countries.

If the past is anything to go by, this is probably the most powerful endorsement of the Trump presidency yet.

The letter writers are not socialists. Like all good economists, they know that free trade, free markets, sound money, and balanced budgets are generally a good idea. They also know, as good economists do, that politicians need to get involved now and again to keep the Good Ship Capitalism afloat.

That’s where things get tricky. Economists are out of their depth in thinking about the complex interaction of politics and economics. As a result, they tend to fall back on a simple rule of thumb: trust the government when it is run by center-left technocrats like themselves. If populists are involved, they stand in opposition even if the results would be good. They fail to see that populists of the right are often better stewards of the economy than center-left technocrats or populists of the left.

If the laureates had a better grasp of the difference between academic theory and policy practice, they would not have issued their silly letter. As an International Monetary Fund official noted in a sharp riposte to Stiglitz’s left-populist book Globalization and its Discontents of 2002: “Stiglitz evidently feels that being a top-notch academic economist is ample qualification for being a good policymaker. The fact is that Joe got a late start in policymaking and shows it.”

This is not the first time Nobel economists have miscalculated by dabbling in politics. Back in 1997, during the heyday of the Clinton-Gore technocracy, a feisty Congress led by Republican party populists grew alarmed by the federal debt, which had doubled to 63 percent of GDP from a post-war low of 31 percent in 1981. A coterie of more than 1,000 economists, including 11 Nobel laureates, rushed out a joint statement calling a balanced budget proposal “unsound and unnecessary.” In retrospect, the economists opposed what might have been the last chance to save the American economy from its current fiscal crisis.

Similarly back in 1986, when President Reagan was using his populist skills to force Japan to reduce protectionist barriers, a group of 12 Nobel laureates called on the president to “resist the pressures for protectionist measures.”

Reagan was an avid free trader, but he also understood the politics of lowering trade barriers better than the economists. His negotiated “voluntary export restraints” with Japan and other countries covered 18 percent of total U.S. imports by 1989. This muscular use of selective protectionism gave him political cover to launch a new round of global trade liberalization that led to the creation of the World Trade Organization. In retrospect, the economists should have stuck to what they knew best.

This week’s letter comes against a backdrop of the same two issues, now looming like Godzilla over American prosperity. The federal debt is now 123 percent of GDP according to the International Monetary Fund, while China’s looting of the American economy through dumping, theft, and domestic barriers to American companies makes the Japan of yore look positively angelic. Warning that Trump will cause inflation, deficits, and threats to American prosperity after a president who has broken historical barriers on all three measures does not pass the laugh test.

In 2021, nearly the same group, including Stiglitz, issued another open letter promising that Biden’s spending blowout would reduce inflation. As The Federalist’s David Harsanyi noted at the time, this was part of a broader pattern of left-leaning economists supporting each and every Democratic Party spending blow-out as a boon to the economy, while issuing dark warnings about Republican policies to cut taxes.

The time seems ripe for some muscular restructuring of the American economy with reduced taxes, more investment, and a return to Reaganite big sticks on trade. Unless of course that intervention is led by a crude populist of the right like Trump who would never be invited to the faculty lounge. Stiglitz has called Trump a con man and a fascist among other epithets.

It’s worth noting that economists also sounded the alarm about populists of the right like Argentina’s current libertarian populist president Javier Milei and former populist Conservative Prime Minister Liz Truss of Britain. The U.K. is about to find out how much it wished Truss had survived her battle with the markets, while Milei’s tough medicine is expected by the IMF to cut Argentina’s inflation from 250 percent this year to 60 percent next year, paving the way for 5 percent real growth.

About the best thing that Trump can say in favor of his economic policies is that they are opposed by a group of Nobel economists.



WWII Veteran Breaks Down in Tears: 'Things We Fought for...Boys That Died...It's All Gone Down the Drain'


posted by Levon Satamian at RedState 

Author’s Note: This article was initially published on July 2, 2022. 

On the occasion of his 100th birthday, United States Marine Corps and World War 2 veteran Carl Dekle reflected on his long life and the blessings he’s enjoyed in an interview with Tampa’s Fox 13. The Silver Star recipient recalled the Battle of Guadalcanal and his gratitude that the Lord brought him home and says that he would do it again if he had to — and if he were the right age.

In full uniform for the interview, Dekle said:

“Most important thing in my life was serving my country. I don’t think I could take away from that…It was an honor for me to serve my country and if I had to do it again and I was the same age. I would do it. I guarantee you.

“You just remember everything’s beautiful and live every day to the fullest. Just enjoy everything you possibly can. And here I sit at 100. They tell me I’m 100. I don’t believe it sometimes. Because I don’t need to worry about age. I’m not going to, I just keep on keeping on.”

As one of many in the “Greatest Generation” who fought for the freedoms we enjoy today, but one of the few still living, Dekle has a unique perspective on our country and what has happened to it over the years. He spoke about how beautiful life is and the world is, then broke down crying, saying, “This is not the country we fought for.”

“People don’t realize what they have … Nowadays I am so upset because the things we did, and the things we fought for, and the boys that died for it, it’s all gone down the drain. Our country is going to hell in a handbasket. We haven’t got the country we had when I was raised, not at all.”

He also made a powerful statement regarding the direction that the United States of America is headed:

“Nobody will have the opportunity I had … That’s not what our boys, that’s not what they died for … It’s just not the same. That isn’t what we fought for.”

Watching this man who sacrificed so much for our country, who watched his brothers-in-arms die for it, weep, believing it was in vain, is heartbreaking.

As America gets ready to celebrate 246 years of independence, a FOX News poll showed that just 39 percent of Americans are proud of the country today, compared to 69 percent of people proud of the country in June of 2011. An astounding 56 percent say they are not proud of the country today.

Former congressman Sean Duffy explained why people should be proud of the United States of America, including the fact that veterans such as Carl Dekle fought for our country, for the freedoms our country offers:

“When it comes down to it, we need to be proud of who we are. Don’t let anyone tell you or your kids that we should be ashamed of this country, because there’s so much to be proud of. Since 1776, the United States has only grown stronger and stronger and stronger. We’re the most innovative and creative country in the world.”

Although the polls may seem grim this year, we live in the greatest country on earth. Even those who bash the country remain in America. The freedoms that Dekle and his generation fought for are the reason why people are able to criticize America while simultaneously enjoying the country’s benefits.

“We’re the land of opportunity. People travel far and wide to come right here to America. We’re the most generous country in the world. We give and give to other countries who aren’t as fortunate because we want to help people.” Duffy continued. “What other country sends their young men to other parts of the world to fight, not for power, not for money, but solely for other people’s freedom? And we’re the most free country on this earth.”

There are millions of citizens who are proud to be an American. They will fight for her like our veterans, our heroes fought for her. America will always be the land of the free and the home of the brave. We must preserve the American Dream. Times may be difficult now, but when times were difficult for our heroes, they did not give up. They fought, fought for our freedom, fought for the American Dream, and fought for We The People, and won. As Ronald Reagan said:

“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.”

The American Dream is alive and well. We live in the land of opportunities. We can’t take the freedoms we have for granted, as these freedoms are not free. We must preserve the land that we love and cherish.