Saturday, November 11, 2023

Would Tucker Carlson make a good running mate for Donald Trump?


Donald Trump appeared on the Clay & Buck show, and the host (I don’t know whether Clay or Buck) asked Trump if he’d consider Tucker as a running mate. After waffling along for a while about the number of viewers he got when he talked to Tucker (very high), compared to viewership for the Republican debates (very low), Trump finally said he would consider Tucker because the latter has “great common sense.” That’s true but Tucker has something even more important: He’s a remarkably gifted communicator in ways that Trump is not.

In his own way, Trump is a very gifted communicator, which is why he was one of the most popular entertainers in America. He has the ability to drive points home through vivid language. “Build a wall.” “Sleepy Joe.” “Low energy Jeb.” None of them are clever phrases because they have wit, rhymes, or alliteration.

In other words, Trump will never be a Winston Churchill. After all, when Harry Truman said of Clement Attlee, who replaced Churchill at 10 Downing Street, “He seems a modest sort of fellow,” Churchill’s instant response was “He’s got a lot to be modest about.” He also memorably called Ramsay MacDonald “a sheep in sheep’s clothing.” One delights in Churchill’s quips. That’s not Trump.

But in his own way, Trump has a remarkable ability to carry people along with his ideas. What Trump cannot do is defend those ideas with any depth or even coherence. He waffles along, as he did in the video above where, instead of just answering the question, he first boasts about his ratings and attacks his opponents’ ratings. It’s a maddeningly indirect style of speech.

Many feel (I among them) that this rambling style gets in the way of conveying important ideas to Americans during incredibly fraught times. We desperately need someone who has a bully pulpit and can articulate big ideas—statesmanlike ideas—about things such as American exceptionalism, the evil of antisemitism, the virtue of the morals set out in the Ten Commandments (whether you’re religious or not), the national need for a border (rather than just “build a wall” and “they’re not sending us their best”), etc.

This doesn’t have to mean using big words. After all, we must acknowledge that, thanks to leftist control over education, Americans seemingly have a communication ability that’s at about the 4th grade level. But even at that level, using simple language, a gifted communicator can sell big and important ideas. But Trump can’t. He speaks in a Trumpian shorthand that sells products without explaining principles.

That’s where Tucker would come in. Unlike Kamala the Cackler, with her inane circular sentences and paragraphs that add no useful content to Biden’s incoherence, Tucker is a master communicator who has a knack when it comes to explaining big ideas. (And this is true whether one agrees with him or not.) Trump could govern and sell, while Tucker could articulate the principles behind the policies.

I’m not saying that Tucker would be a good choice for veep or that he would or should want the job. I’m just saying that, when it comes to communications from the White House, he would be the yin to Trump’s yang, with the two of them presenting a perfect front of truly speaking to the American people.

Incidentally, this is an old idea. When God called upon Moses, Moses objected that he was a bad communicator being slow of tongue and lacking in eloquence. (Exodus 4:10.) God refused to see that as a problem. (Exodus 4:11.) Instead, whether he gave Moses the solution or Moses figured it out, by the time Moses showed up in front of Pharaoh, he had his brother Aaron with him to help him communicate those all-important idea about liberty. (Exodus 5.)

So, while I’m certainly not endorsing Tucker as a running mate, it’s not a terrible idea, assuming he wants the job.


X22, SGT Report, and more- November 11

 





US military aircraft crashes in the Mediterranean Sea

 

STUTTGART, Germany— An American military aircraft crashed during a training exercise in the eastern Mediterranean Sea, U.S. European Command said late Saturday.

The incident occurred Friday evening when the plane “suffered a mishap and went down,” EUCOM said in a statement.

“Out of respect for the families affected, we will not release further information on the personnel involved at this time,” EUCOM said.

The military said the crash was under investigation, but that it did not appear to be the result of hostile activity.

The mishap comes during a time of high tension in the eastern Mediterranean, where the Pentagon has moved substantial forces in the aftermath of Israel’s war with Hamas. Just last week, two Navy aircraft carriers, involving some 11,000 U.S. personnel, launched aircraft and practiced missile defense during a three-day exercise in the area. 


It wasn’t clear whether the aircraft crash Friday was related to carrier group operations in the region.

In addition to Navy warships, the U.S. has also moved an array of ground defenses into the Middle East in an effort to defend U.S. forces in the region and deter a wider war.

The hostilities in Gaza have had indirect repercussions for U.S. forces elsewhere.

Since mid-October, militant groups aligned with Iran have repeatedly targeted U.S. bases in Iraq and Syria, resulting in more than 50 American troops being injured, according to the Pentagon. 



https://www.stripes.com/theaters/europe/2023-11-11/american-military-aircraft-crash-mediterranean-12018071.html   





Hamas Terrorist Attack Drove the Left’s Growing Antisemitism Into the Open

It has no place in our great nation


The recent huge anti-Israel and anti-Semitic demonstrations in several U.S. cities and on college campuses, as well as harassment and threats against Jewish Americans, surprised many Americans and the mainstream media.

But the truth is, if you were unaware of the rise in anti-Semitism and hostility toward the State of Israel from some segments of American society in recent years – especially on the Left – you either have not been paying attention or have been looking the other way.

FBI Director Christopher Wray recently testified to Congress that Jews make up 2.4% of the U.S. population but have been the targets of 60% of religiously based hate crimes. But this figure was from before the outbreak of anti-Semitism in the U.S. after the October 7 Hamas terrorist attack on Israel during which more than 1,400 Israelis were killed, many of them women and children who had been tortured and raped. Hamas also took more than 200 hostages from Israel back to Gaza. In the aftermath of this horrific attack, Jews in this country are facing threats to their personal security that can only be described as an emergency.

One of the worst of these instances happened on October 25 when a group of Jewish students at the Cooper Union college in New York City sought refuge in a library conference room while a mob of pro-Hamas demonstrators tried to break down the door to get them.

Jews in New York City are all too aware of such threats. There were 263 attacks against Jews in the city in 2022. There has been a sharp increase in harassment and violence against Jewish New Yorkers on the streets of the city as well as vandalism of Jewish schools and synagogues. Two New York City synagogues I visited last year looked like fortresses with armed security guards.

Sadly, these hate crimes get very little press coverage, especially in the national media. This probably is because, in the American Left’s worldview of “intersectionality,” diversity, equity, and inclusion, they refuse to include Jewish Americans as a protected group because of open anti-Semitism, hatred of Israel, and their alliance with radical Islamists, including radical Palestinian activists.

The recent pro-Hamas and anti-Israel protests in American cities and on college campuses are the result of this leftist-Islamist alliance and their years of work to promote a false narrative of Palestinians as the victims of Israeli oppression. Many of the college students who recently signed letters blaming Israel for the atrocities committed by Hamas are mindless ignoramuses who don’t know where Gaza is and can’t spell the word “Israel.”

Another example of this problem that received little press was the Women’s March – the organization that sponsored the huge 2017 women’s protest march in Washington, DC after President Trump’s inauguration – and how it became consumed by infighting among its leadership between anti-Semites and liberal Jewish women. Some of the Women’s March leaders equated Judaism with white supremacy and were supporters of notorious anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan. One Women’s March leader said they could not feature Jewish women without risking support from groups like Black Lives Matter. The rift became so serious that it led to the resignations of Jewish women leaders in the group and the march split into two marches in 2018, one officially run by the Women’s March organization and another by “March On,” a group that stressed its denunciation of anti-Semitism.

There also have been signs of growing anti-Semitism and hostility to Israel within the Democratic Party in recent years.

For example, during a Democratic National Convention in Charlotte in 2012, Democratic delegates booed during a platform vote to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. This language was only included because Barack Obama intervened. Mr. Obama, of course, had no intention of acting on this idea if he won the 2012 election.

In 2019, all of the Democratic presidential candidates, in response to demands by far-left groups like MoveOn.org, boycotted the bi-partisan America Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) Conference in Washington, DC. In a March 2019 article, MoveOn.Org claimed that 74% of its members did not want Democratic presidential candidates to attend the AIPAC conference and faulted AIPAC for being “known to peddle anti-Muslim and anti-Arab rhetoric while giving platforms to Islamophobes.”

Vice President Mike Pence condemned this boycott in his remarks at the 2019 AIPAC conference:

“As I stand before you, eight Democrat candidates for president are actually boycotting this very conference. So let me be clear on this point, anyone who aspires to the highest office in the land should not be afraid to stand with the strongest supporters of Israel in America. It is wrong to boycott Israel, and it is wrong to boycott AIPAC.”

Also in 2019, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn) introduced a resolution in the House of Representatives comparing Israel to Nazi Germany and supporting the Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement that seeks to wage economic warfare on the Jewish state. Omar’s resolution was co-sponsored by Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich) and Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga).

Then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi attempted to pass a resolution in 2019 that condemned anti-Semitism in response to Omar’s resolution and statements. It eventually was watered down by progressive Democrats to also include a denunciation of other forms of bigotry, including anti-Muslim bias. Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY) angrily condemned the watered-down resolution as “spineless” and “disgusting.”

Omar also was forced by House leadership to issue an apology in 2019 for her anti-Semitic tweets. One of Kevin McCarthy’s first actions as House Speaker was to kick Rep. Omar off the House Foreign Affairs Committee in response to her anti-Semitic and anti-Israel statements.

On November 7, 2023, the House of Representatives censured Rep. Rashida Tlaib for her anti-Israel and anti-Semitic comments after the October 7 Hamas terrorist attack. The censure resolution passed by a vote of 234-188, with 22 Democrats voting in favor. Four Republicans voted against the resolution on free speech grounds.

Tlaib was censored for her comments accusing President Biden of supporting what she claimed was Israel’s genocide of Palestinians and chanting the phrase “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” which is widely interpreted as a Palestinian call to eradicate Israel and kill its Jewish citizens.

The Tlaib censure resolution was a rare bit of good news in the aftermath of the horrible events of October 7. But the vast majority of Democrats voted against the resolution. Tlaib and her supporters in the House were defiant after the vote. And the mainstream media treated the censure as a partisan stunt by Republicans and ignored the 22 Democrats who voted for the measure.

Meanwhile, the Biden Administration has tried to downplay questions about the recent surge in anti-Semitism in the United States and has instead named a national commission on “Islamophobia” which Vice President Kamala Harris will chair.

If any new presidential commission should be named in the aftermath of the Hamas terrorist attack, it should be an emergency commission on the rise of anti-Semitism in the United States.

The recent surge in anti-Semitic incidents in our country did not happen in a vacuum or without warning. This problem has been festering for years in plain view. The media has known about this problem and ignored it. Politicians knew about it too and looked the other way. Democratic Party leaders tolerated supporters who spouted hatred of Jewish people and Israel because they wanted the votes of far-left progressives and assumed that Jewish Americans were a loyal voting block that would never leave them.

The October 7, 2023 Hamas terrorist attack was the worst attack against the Jewish people since the Holocaust and an act of genocide. To protect the freedom and security of all Americans, it is vital that our leaders adopt – on a bipartisan basis – a comprehensive, no-excuses response to the Hamas atrocities that addresses the growing problem of anti-Semitism in this country and ostracizes anyone who praises or justifies the Hamas attack. There should be no role in professional life for anyone who praises or excuses genocide.

This comprehensive response must address the deep roots of anti-Semitism in our country today and aggressively counter it on college campuses by enforcing anti-hate crime laws and regulations rules to cover anti-Semitic violence and harassment. There also should be an effort to promote diversity of thought on college campuses by hiring moderate and conservative professors and firing professors who are teaching extreme leftist ideology and anti-Semitic garbage.

Standing with Israel and against anti-Semitism and all forms of hatred is the American way. Israel is a democracy and a strong ally of the United States that deserves the support of all Americans. And anti-Semitism is an ancient and toxic prejudice that has no place in our great nation.



Federal Judge Blocks ATF From Arresting Millions Of Pistol Brace Owners



Millions of law-abiding gun owners who were turned into criminals overnight under the Biden administration’s new pistol brace ban have temporary relief after a federal judge in Texas issued a nationwide injunction preventing the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives from enforcing it.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk ruled on Wednesday that the unelected bureaucrats’ attempts to legislate by regulation instead of enforcing the gun laws already on the books were unlawful and, in the case of pistol braces, must cease immediately.

The ATF’s rule, enacted earlier this year, sought to jail and fine any of the estimated 40 million U.S. pistol brace owners who refused to reclassify their weapons as short barrel rifles, which require registration with the government and a $200 tax stamp, or destroy the pistol brace. Gun owners in the 21 states with SBR bans were forced to choose between relinquishing their weapons or destroying their pistol brace-equipped firearms to avoid penalty and punishment.

The plaintiffs in Britto v. ATF, “three decorated Marine veterans” represented by the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL), argued that the rule violates the Second Amendment and should be rendered “void for vagueness.”

Kacsmaryk agreed. He also noted that the rule would also place undue financial burden on not just gun owners but pistol brace manufacturers.

“Additionally, ATF admits the 10-year cost of the Rule is over one billion dollars,” he wrote. “And because of the Rule, certain manufacturers that obtain most of their sales from stabilizing braces risk having to close their doors for good.”

The judge claimed “the Court is certainly sympathetic to ATF’s concerns over public safety in the wake of tragic mass shootings” but noted that “public safety concerns must be addressed in ways that are lawful.”

“This Rule is not,” Kacsmaryk concluded.

Kacsmaryk is not the first judge to grant an injunction in this case, nor is he the first to chastise the ATF for enacting a rule that, as the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals determined in August, would “likely fail constitutional muster.” The Texas judge is, however, the first judicial authority to apply his injunction to all pistol brace owners, not just the plaintiffs bringing the case.

“This new federal ruling protects the 2nd Amendment Rights of millions of Americans. WILL is proud to work alongside our clients and blaze a trail against this unconstitutional federal action,” WILL Deputy Counsel Dan Lennington said in a statement.



Dershowitz Rips Obama's 'Deep Hatred of Israel,' Vows Relationship With Former President Is 'Over'


Mike Miller reporting for RedState 

The relationship between former President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wasn't good from the outset. In fact, it was terrible.

Throughout Obama's presidency, the goings-on between the two heads of state ranged from petty to frosty to sometimes, in Obama's case, downright disrespectful. It could also be potentially dangerous. (We'll get there.)

At the philosophical core of the bitter disagreement between the two men was (and remains) the Palestinian issue and how to resolve it and, of course, Obama's views and past actions with respect to dealing with Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons. 

In late December 2016, just days before Obama left office, the United States abstained from voting on a United Nations Security Council resolution that demanded Israel stop settlement construction in the West Bank, which infuriated Netanyahu. 

Obama's decision broke with decades of US policy on the UN's condemnation of Israel.

Fast-forward 15 years, and Obama hasn't changed a bit concerning Israel, the Palestinians, and his steadfast belief that "Islam is a religion of peace." Scratch that; Obama's views are now not only more strident — they're unshackled by the presidency, so he can say whatever the hell he wants.

As reported by my colleague Bob Hoge last Sunday, Obama finally weighed in on the Israel-Hamas War and promptly pronounced that "nobody's hands are clean," about Israel's retaliatory campaign against the brutal Hamas terrorists who snuck into Israel and massacred more than 1,400 Israeli men, women, and children — including babies.

Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz was furious. (emphasis mine)

All of this is taking place against the backdrop of decades of failure to achieve a durable peace for both Israelis and Palestinians. One that is based on genuine security for Israel, a recognition of its right to exist, and a peace that is based on an end of the occupation and the creation of a viable state and self-determination for the Palestinian people.

"Occupation." Code word. Big time.

Arrogance abounds.

Enter, Alan Dershowitz

So, Alan Dershowitz ripped into Obama on Friday morning during an appearance on "Mornings with Maria" on Fox Business, telling the host that because of Obama's recent comments, his relationship with the former president is "over." 

I think he always had a deep hatred of Israel in his heart.

He [once] called me to the Oval Office and he said to me, 'Alan, you've known me for a long time. You know I have Israel's back.' I didn't realize he meant to paint a target on it. He's never been supportive of Israel. And finally, his true feelings have come out now that he's no longer president and doesn't have to be elected.

He has contributed enormously to the problem because he is respected among young people. And if he says the occupation is unbearable and that anything can be done to stop it, he is encouraging people to engage in their antisemitic, anti-Israel, and anti-American attitudes. 

"He should be ashamed of himself," Dershowitz continued: "He should apologize, but he won't." 

Exactly. The next time Obama is ashamed of himself or apologizes for anything will be the first time -- in both cases.

Dershowitz is outraged with Obama over the latter's "despicable" suggestion of moral equivalency — the lack thereof, as it were — between civilians killed by the conflict in Gaza and the unspeakable slaughter of Israeli citizens by Hamas. He said:

To compare those disputed claims with the rapes, beheadings, burnings, kidnappings — it's just obscene and despicable. And what it does is it lends support to those students basically, who are saying, ‘Well, what Hamas really did was not so bad... It was in response to the 'occupation.'

Although he said that the attacks by Hamas are not justifiable. He made them justifiable because if life really is unbearable, as it's not, then you can do anything you want.

Finally, Dershowitz said he fears that Obama's comments could further fuel antisemitism in the U.S.

What he did was contribute to the risks to not only Israelis but Americans, because it's coming to a theater near you. If Hamas is not stopped in its tracks from doing the terrorist acts, they will bring them to the United States.

You can watch the full segment on Fox Business here.

The Bottom Line

Barack Obama, ever the smug globalist, and ever the cheerleader for the Palestinians, is never going to change his Israel-blaming stripes. Thankfully, Bibi Netanyahu and the Israeli people are no longer affected by his actions or rhetoric.



Profiles in Woke Twitter Professors Acting Very Stupidly


Sister Toldjah reporting for RedState 

Not that it wasn't obvious well before the Hamas-instigated war with Israel began that our higher education institutions are full of woke professors who indoctrinate hate instead of educating, but in the four weeks since then, it has been confirmed beyond a shadow of a doubt, as evidenced by the wave of antisemitic "protests" on college campuses across the country.

But while woke professors can be grating and dangerous enough to encounter in person, the ones on Twitter are a special type of annoying, as any conservative who spends even the bare minimum time on the social media platform can attest.

NYU Journalism Professor Jay Rosen, who is the embodiment of pretty much everything wrong with modern journalism, is one example, but there are others with less of a reach who still manage to inform as to the dire state of things in academia, such as the ones who celebrated the July 2020 death of conservative UNC-Wilmington Professor Mike Adams, including another journalism professor who said though it was "unfortunate" that Adams committed suicide, he was "not a guy headed to heaven" due to his alleged homophobia and misogyny.

But back to present times, this week was another banner week for woke professors on Twitter acting very stupidly, as evidenced by the response one gave to a tweet by conservative commentator Eli Lake.

Lake, who is Jewish, correctly pointed out that "Most of the people saying Israel is committing a genocide are low information fools following a trend, performing edgy empathy, seeking social credit. Ignore them."

"If you’re feeling charitable, urge them to find another hobby," Lake also wrote.

This didn't sit well with author Jonathan Brown, a Professor of Islamic Civilization at Georgetown, who responded by flashing his higher ed creds in an attempt to pass himself off as some type of authoritative source on the matter.

"Israel has been engaged in a genocidal project for decades," Brown claimed without providing credible evidence. "I’m a full professor."

Wow. "Full professor." I mean, aren't you impressed? Probably not, but you know he really, really wants you to be. Even more troubling, though, is that he is charged with educating the next generation.

pointed out that he was indeed "full" ... of something, but not knowledge.

Relatedly, Arizona State University law professor Khaled Beydoun, who is also a "Scholar-in-Residence" at Harvard, wanted his followers to know that he had allegedly experienced Islamophobia on Instagram.

The problem was, however, that messages in blue are sent by the user (in this case, the professor), not the person who is trying to connect with them, as Community Notes helpfully pointed out:

Our colleagues at our sister site Twitchy labeled it Beydoun's "Jussie Smollett moment" (the online version, at least), which is a pretty perfect description of it.

While I have a lot of respect for those who want to better themselves and others through higher ed, I have zero respect for those who abuse their positions of power to corrupt and warp impressionable young minds into hating their country and supporting genocidal terrorist groups like Hamas.

Every time I come across tweets like these from our supposed intellectual betters I am reminded all over again that prestigious college degrees and fancy titles and letters after names do not always elevate someone to "smartest person in the room" status. In fact, many times it's just the opposite, with these very people using their education as a crutch with which to use on people in order to try and hide their idiocy:

They think we're too dumb to see right through it. But they're wrong. We do. 



Scary Stuff Happening at MIT: Staff Harassed, Jewish Students 'Physically Prevented' From Going to Class

Nick Arama reporting for RedState 

Things have been getting out of control on college campuses when it comes to the anti-Israel crowd. 

As we reported earlier, anti-Israel groups at Columbia University were suspended for threatening behavior and intimidation. 

At MIT (the Massachusetts Institue of Technology), the anti-Israel crowd took it to a whole new level, as this letter from the students revealed. Professor Retsef Levi posted what the letter said and it's some pretty scary stuff, like a throwback to the 1930s. 


Today, Jewish and Israeli MIT students were physically prevented from attending class by a hostile group of pro-Hamas and anti-Israel MIT students that call themselves the CAA. This is after students from the CAA harassed MIT staff members in their offices for being Jewish and interrupted classes in the past few weeks. All of this has occurred with no clear response from the administration. With each passing day, MIT admin’s silence makes Jewish and Israeli students feel unsafe at MIT. Many Jewish students fear leaving their dorm rooms and have stated that they feel MIT is not safe for Jews. This message is compounded by the public and private warnings of Hillel and many faculty that Jewish students should not enter MIT’s main lobby today, November 9th, 2023.

Not only did they prevent Jewish students from attending class, but they also harassed professors, The reaction of the school? Not to go after the students doing this, but to tell the Jewish student to not enter the front lobby. On Nov. 9. The anniversary of Kristallnacht, the Night of the Broken Glass, Nov. 9, 1938, when Nazis rampaged and attacked Jewish stores, homes, and people. 

Instead of dispersing the mob or de-escalating the situation by rerouting all students from Lobby 7, Jewish students specifically were warned not to enter MIT’s front entrance due to a risk to their physical safety. The onus to protect Jewish students should not be on the students themselves. 

MIT administration recently announced guidelines to avoid illegal and unsafe protests on campus. The CAA, which planned the protest, knowingly and proudly violated these requirements, and even invited people from outside of MIT to join them. Their actions inhibit the possibility of safe and peaceful dialogue and endanger Jewish students on campus. 

The CAA hosted a blockade that not only disregards MIT guidelines, but also obstructs Jewish students from attending classes. 

Some Jewish students who saw the administration’s failure to respond to the targeted harassment of Jews on campus by the CAA came together to support each other and peacefully together stand against this threat to their safety. 

Four hours after the blockade started, at 12 pm, the MIT administration passed a letter to all students, threatening their suspension if the crowds did not disperse from Lobby 7. Only the Jewish students left immediately. The CAA protesters did not cooperate. Indeed, the CAA proceeded to invite more students and non-MIT protestors to join them in calling for a violent uprising (“Intifada”) and justifying the terror attacks of Hamas on Israeli civilians. 

At 5 pm, all students on campus were warned through MIT’s emergency notification system to “avoid Lobby 7” –– officially recognizing the danger present to students as a result of this violent protest. No Jewish or Israeli students were present at this point. 

As of 10:30 tonight MIT has officially decided not to academically suspend CAA students who repeatedly violated the administration's guidelines and threats. They have shown that actions against Jews at MIT do not have consequences. Additionally, in an email to DUSP students, the Department Head indicated that he would protect any DUSP students involved in violating MIT’s rules today by protesting with the CAA. Not only do Jewish students feel unsafe on campus, but now they also feel excluded from and unsafe in DUSP.  

Today, on the 9th of November, on the 85th anniversary of Kristallnacht, which marked the beginning of the Holocaust, Jews at MIT were told to enter campus from back entrances and not to stay in Hillel for fear of their physical safety. 

We are seeing history repeating itself and Jews on MIT’s campus are afraid.

DUSP is the Department of Urban Studies and Planning. 

This is what happens when you have no order -- when baying mobs take over. It's not just reminiscent of the Nazis, but of the Cultural Revolution, where those in groups the mob was taught to hate were hounded. We've seen aspects of this before, in how colleges have dealt with conservative speakers. What makes it worse is the school's reaction, which throws the Jewish students to the wolves and doesn't hold anyone to account. 

Watch this video from earlier in the week, as a class is interrupted by a protester demanding the class be stopped -- to listen to him announce a walkout to march to "free Palestine." The person teaching, frightened or just conceding, accedes to his demands. This is nuts. 

Things looked like they were completely out of control. The President of MIT, Sally Kornbluth later issued a statement saying the protesters had violated rules. But they weren't booting them from the university because that could cause them to have visa issues. So? Take action anyway. 

All MIT did was say, as an interim action, the protesters would be suspended from non-academic student activities, but get to go to classes -- even though they tried to prevent Jewish students from going to classes. 

That's shameful, and it's a weak letter from MIT. But this is why these students think they can get away with such craziness. 



These 70 GOPers Just Rewarded The FBI With New Headquarters Worth $375M



On the day that the DOJ announced arrests related to a brothel that focused on political clients, these 70 Republicans voted to give the FBI brand new headquarters.

Florida Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz moved to defund plans for the new office building with an amendment to the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act for 2024. House Democrats were unanimous in opposing the Gaetz proposal and were joined by 70 Republicans. Gaetz’s proposal failed 273 to 145 in a Wednesday vote, the same day the Justice Department unveiled three arrests over a “sophisticated high-end brothel” ring operating in Virginia and Massachusetts.

Despite decades of misconduct revealing an agency politicized beyond repair on behalf of Democrats dispatched to prosecute political opponents, House Republicans have given the FBI a multi-million-dollar new complex to interfere in foreseeable elections.

[READ: Think The FBI Deserves The Benefit Of The Doubt? This Laundry List Of Corruption Should Make You Think Again]

Here are the Republicans who gave the FBI their blessing Wednesday:

  1. Don Bacon, Nebraska
  2. Andy Barr, Kentucky
  3. Cliff Bentz, Oregon
  4. Stephanie Bice, Oklahoma
  5. Mike Bost, Illinois
  6. Vern Buchanan, Florida
  7. Ken Buck, Colorado
  8. Ken Calvert, California
  9. Mike Carey, Ohio
  10. John Carter, Texas
  11. Lori Chavez-DeRemer, Oregon
  12. Tom Cole, Oklahoma
  13. Anthony D’Esposito, New York
  14. Mario Diaz-Balart, Florida
  15. John Duarte, California
  16. Chuck Edwards, North Carolina
  17. Jake Ellzey, Texas
  18. Randy Feenstra, Iowa
  19. A. Drew Ferguson IV, Georgia
  20. Brian Fitzpatrick, Pennsylvania
  21. Mike Flood, Nebraska
  22. Andrew Garbarino, New York
  23. Tony Gonzales, Texas
  24. Jenniffer Gonzalez-Colon, Puerto Rico
  25. Kay Granger, Texas
  26. Sam Graves, Missouri
  27. Brett Guthrie, Kentucky
  28. Ashley Hinson, Iowa
  29. David Joyce, Ohio
  30. Thomas Kean, New Jersey
  31. Mike Kelly, Pennsylvania
  32. Kevin Kiley, California
  33. Young Kim, California
  34. David Kustoff, Tennessee
  35. Darin LaHood, Illinois
  36. Nick LaLota, New York
  37. Doug Lamborn, Colorado
  38. Michael Lawler, New York
  39. Laurel Lee, Florida
  40. Julia Letlow, Louisiana
  41. Frank Lucas, Oklahoma
  42. Blaine Luetkemeyer, Missouri
  43. Nicole Malliotakis, New York
  44. Richard McCormick, Georgia
  45. Patrick McHenry, North Carolina
  46. Daniel Meuser, Pennsylvania
  47. Max Miller, Ohio
  48. Blake Moore, Utah
  49. James Moylan, Guam
  50. Gregory Murphy, North Carolina
  51. Dan Newhouse, Washington
  52. Zachary Nunn, Iowa
  53. Jay Obernolte, California
  54. Mike Rogers, Alabama
  55. Harold Rogers, Kentucky
  56. Maria Elvira Salazar, Florida
  57. Austin Scott, Georgia
  58. Pete Sessions, Texas
  59. Michael Simpson, Idaho
  60. Jason Smith, Missouri
  61. Christopher H. Smith, New Jersey
  62. Lloyd Smucker, Pennsylvania
  63. Dale Strong, Alabama
  64. Glenn Thompson, Pennsylvania
  65. Mike Turner, Ohio
  66. David Valadao, California
  67. Derrick Van Orden, Wisconsin
  68. Ann Wagner, Missouri
  69. Brad Wenstrup, Ohio
  70. Steve Womack, Arkansas