Thursday, September 14, 2023

Trump Taught Republicans How To Win


It Is Time They Follow His Lead


As House Republicans have settled back into Washington, D.C. this week fresh off a month-long hiatus, all eyes will turn to whether the party in control of the lower chamber can muster any resistance against the current regime running roughshod over the nation and blatantly interfering with the upcoming presidential election.

Since Congress embarked upon their month-long recess, the (essentially) presumptive GOP nominee was indicted twice, once by the Department of Justice which House Republicans continue to fund, and another time in a jurisdiction overseen by a Republican Governor with Republican-majorities in both chambers of the state assembly. To add insult to injury, the trial dates for President Trump’s litany of cases have been set conspicuously near the days voters will be heading to the polls for the first time during the 2024 election season, incontrovertible evidence of election interference (if not the regime’s outright mockery of the Democracy they purport to care so deeply about).

Even still, President Trump, though he certainly bears the majority of the burden, is not the only one feeling the wrath of the weaponized government. The Biden administration is targeting pro-life activists, traditional Catholic parishes have found themselves on FBI watchlists, and hundreds of people who exercised their right to assembly continue to languish in the DC prison, denied their due process rights. Moreover, for those who have praised the integrity of local Republican-controlled state governments as bulwarks against the excesses of a Democrat-controlled federal or state government, recent malicious prosecutions occurring within the confines of ostensible “red-havens” of Georgia and Texas summarily repudiate that proposition. Eighteen other Republicans – from esteemed lawyers, constitutional scholars, public servants, and some private citizens – are embroiled in criminal charges, unable to look for refuge to the Georgia Governor, who seems to place greater value in the interests shared by those who frequent the same Davos events he attends, rather than those held by the people who elected him. A not dissimilar case is occurring in Texas, where Attorney General Ken Paxton must defend himself in an impeachment trial for, principally, the original sin of defeating a member of the Bush family in his recent election. Make no mistake: supporting Trump is now an indictable offense which establishment Republicans are cheering on.

Indeed, the House Republicans are outnumbered – the Trump-aligned members even more so – but they are not powerless. Recall, when the left controlled only the lower chamber of Congress, they tactfully used the same relatively limited power they had to stall, impede upon, and drain resources from the incumbent Trump administration. This month marks four years since then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi initiated the first of two impeachments against the duly elected President Trump, in a move that was wholly manufactured and void ab initio (the GOP-controlled Senate was not going to convict the President). However, one could argue that the spectacle was a success insofar as the process then, as it remains today, was the punishment.

Now that roles are reversed, Republicans have been lethargic at best, and complicit at worst: they granted Biden a victory on the debt ceiling agreement, enabled the endless funding of the Ukraine war while families in Maui continue to suffer, have left unchecked the worst border invasion in our country’s history, and have permitted – if not facilitated – the politicized prosecutions of Biden’s to-be opponent. An opposition party worth its salt would not lament its relative lack of power, but instead use its significant authority to do everything feasible to mount some sort of strategic opposition.

For what it’s worth, the House majority campaigned on stopping the “weaponization of government,” unmasking the Bidens’ corruption, issuing subpoenas to FBI officials, and stopping the “blank checks” to Ukraine. This time, though, voters were told this wasn’t bluster: to prove it, the power-sharing agreement for which twenty members valiantly fought in January – including but not limited to a single-member motion to vacate the speaker – were supposed to serve as leverage to ensure the leadership would keep their word. The new House majority promised to change the game in Washington, and for good reason too: this current House has been served on a silver platter issues to tackle on behalf of the American people. Still, nine months in and the country has precipitously worsened since Speaker McCarthy was elected on the fifteenth ballot. The hour is late. It is past time they begin wielding the power they have. This can be done in multiple ways.

Some have floated the potential of a Church-style committee to confront the egregious actions of this administration – and the regime more broadly. The House could investigate the circumstances which “arguably involve the most massive attack on free speech in United States history,” pertaining to the federal government’s collusion with big tech. As once promised, January 6thtapes should be released to the public. McCarthy once demanded the January 6th Committee preserve all records, which did not happen. What will his recourse be? McCarthy also promised that the debt-ceiling agreement would put Republicans in a prime spot with the appropriations negotiations. Seal the border, release the January 6th tapes, withhold funding – if a government shutdown must happen, so be it. All Republicans should vocally join the campaign pressuring Brian Kemp to grant Georgia State Senator Colton Moore’s calls for an emergency session to investigate and defund Fani Willis (and ultimately remove the prosecutor) and continue to delegitimize each of the indictments levied against the party leader. It goes without saying, but Republicans in the House must promptly begin impeachments of Biden, Garland, and Mayorkas. Not only are the proceedings necessary, but they also drain the administration of resources otherwise used for their agenda in the year leading up to reelection.

The failure of the Republican party to prevail in election cycles since 2016 is because of the party establishment’s lethargy – a party which has been granted power by voters time and again, yet continue to squander it at every turn. Trump authored the winning playbook for Republicans in the twenty-first century when he resuscitated the party from life support in 2016. Without Trump, prospect of a Republican nationwide electoral victory would be all but lost, the Blue Wall insurmountable. Even still, it was Republicans who obstructed the Trump administration – It was at the hand of an establishment Republican that the years-long quest of repealing and replacing Obamacare was destroyed. Republicans stood in the way of President Trump receiving the requested funding for a border wall, and Republicans continue today to stand by – incapable of effectively wielding their power – in the face of blatant weaponization of the justice system.

Trump won the election the first time without the party’s institutional support. If necessary, he may have to do it again. But the “party” as it exists faces a time for choosing: either adopt his lead to reflect the will of the people, or remain idle as the destruction of this country continues untrammeled.



X22, On the Fringe, and more- Sept 14

 




President Trump Takes Biggest Lead in Quinnipiac Poll



President Donald Trump has taken the biggest lead in the most recent Quinnipiac Poll [DATA HERE].   Oddly, the Quinnipiac results are almost identical to another poll taken by Premise polling on Sept 6th [SEE HERE].

At this point the GOPe battle against President Trump looks stunningly futile.  Team DeSantis alone has spent near $200 million so far, and he’s lost half the support they had before they spent a dime.  lol 👀  Yet, the billionaire classes of multinational donors, Wall St, corporations and other entities with vested financial interests in America-LAST, are continuing to fund the battle against Trump.

Quinnipiac – In the race for the 2024 Republican Party nomination, support for former President Donald Trump now stands at 62 percent among Republican and Republican leaning voters, slightly up from 57 percent support in August, according to a Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pea-ack) University national poll released today.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis receives 12 percent support, down from 18 percent support in August. In today’s poll, entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy receives 6 percent support, former United Nations Ambassador and South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley and former Vice President Mike Pence each receive 5 percent support, South Carolina Senator Tim Scott receives 3 percent support, and former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie receives 2 percent support. All other listed Republican candidates receive less than 2 percent support. (more)


There’s No Way To Justify Continued Funding For The Federal Government



While we gleefully await the federal government’s bankruptcy at the end of the month, here’s my favorite Elon Musk quote: “What did you get done this week?”

Every Republican in Congress should have to answer that question to the American taxpayer (you and me) before even thinking about giving another cent to Ukraine, the Pentagon, the DOJ, Health and Human Services, and every other department that is, at best, useless, and at worst, packed with paper pushers overtly harassing the people who pay their outsized salaries (you and me).

The Musk quote came in a strikingly similar context. In a text chat, some overpaid Twitter executive lectured him about the “internal distraction” that Musk’s public comments about the company had made after he purchased a large portion of its shares. “Next time we speak, I’d like to provide you perspective on the level of internal distraction right now and how it [sic] hurting our ability to do work,” the executive said.

“What did you get done this week?” Musk replied.

What makes it so good is that there is no answer to the question. Just some Twitter nerd versed only in talking about “optimization” (meaningless) and “company culture” (zero productivity value) blankly staring in a freeze.

To be sure, plenty of Republicans in Congress would have a lot to say should they be asked to justify their existence or a vote to spend more money.

Funding Ukraine is about defending democracy!

Funding the Pentagon is about supporting the military!

Infrastructure!

Border security!

Name exactly one thing there that has worked to Americans’ advantage in the last three years.

Here’s a release from the Biden White House a year ago: “Biden-⁠Harris Administration Announces New Actions and Funding to Address the Overdose Epidemic and Support Recovery.” That valiant effort purportedly included $1.5 billion “for all States and Territories to Address Addiction and the Opioid Crisis.”

Now here’s NPR eight months later: “Drug deaths nationwide hit a new record in 2022. 109,680 people died as the fentanyl crisis continued to deepen, according to preliminary data released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.”

What’s the return on investment there? A dead American for every $14,000 in tax dollars spent?

White House: Let’s double that budget!

Biden is requesting just another $24 billion in aid to Ukraine, which, of course, Republican Senate Leader Mitch McConnell is crying happy tears to have approved as soon as yesterday.

We’re marching into the second year of footing the bill for this war, having committed many billions of dollars in aid to Ukraine. In that time, according to even The New York Times (Ukraine’s tried and true relayer of state propaganda), Russia has managed to occupy tens of thousands of square miles of Ukraine territory, while simultaneously ingratiating itself to critical U.S. adversaries China and North Korea.

Such maneuvers were previously known as “the beginnings of a world war.”

Members of Biden’s own party are dogging his open-border policies. Health and Human Services melted its own credibility on “science,” then recently flirted with recommending public masking again. The Justice Department is found out over and over again to be hostile toward the rule of law and the will of the people.

Which of the seven heads on this monstrosity is even bothering to smile at me? Why would I care if the federal government is funded when it does nothing for me? What’s worse, it functions in ways that make clear it deeply resents me.

Tell me, Republicans. What did you get done this week?



Do Not Be Fooled: They Really Do Want Your Guns


The reactions to New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham’s “emergency” order banning the carrying of firearms in Albuquerque were largely what one might expect – especially coming from the right. But surprisingly, many on the left took issue with the order as well. 

Even though the Democratic Party is firmly in the anti-gunner camp, several individuals criticized the order despite their virulent advocacy for gun control laws that restrict the right to keep and bear arms. However, as the Libertarian Party’s Mises Caucus pointed out, there might be more to this than meets the eye.

Shortly after the news broke about Gov. Lujan Grisham’s authoritarian order, Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA), who has likely never seen a firearm he didn’t want to seize, slammed the order as unconstitutional.

Lieu: 

I support gun safety laws. However, this order from the Governor of New Mexico violates the U.S. Constitution. No state in the union can suspend the federal Constitution. There is no such thing as a state public health emergency exception to the U.S. Constitution.

To make things even more perplexing, anti-gunner activist David Hogg also chimed in, taking issue with the governor issuing her order under the guise of declaring a public health emergency.

I support gun safety but there is no such thing as a state public health emergency exception to the U.S. Constitution.

At the heart of this debate is the Second Amendment, which protects people’s gun rights. The order raises a serious question: Can a state-led public health emergency order, or any others, override a natural right that is protected by the Constitution? The answer is a clear “no,” and Lieu and Hogg seem to agree.

However, the Mises Caucus published a post on X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, urging caution for liberty-minded people encouraged by leftists not immediately rushing to defend Lujan Grisham. They pointed out that while it appears these individuals are defending natural rights, they could very well have ulterior motives.

“David Hogg and Ted Lieu don’t care about your rights; they just want the feds to be the ones to violate them,” they wrote.

Full tweet:

A number of liberty minded people took a positive view of the messaging from @davidhogg111  and @tedlieu  regarding the unconstitutional actions of New Mexico governor Grisham. They both said exactly the same thing, “There is no such thing as a state public health emergency exception to the U.S. Constitution” a message certainly provided by their DNC handlers. It is important to read between the lines when assessing these statements, they say there is no “state” exception, because they want to normalize the idea of a “federal” exception to the constitution. It’s an attempt to leverage rhetoric to set the stage for future federal top-down mandates, while fostering the idea that states and by extension more local levels of governance should have no say in the matter. It’s a “limited hangout” a little taste of sanity to get you further invested in a narrative. David Hogg and Ted Lieu don’t care about your rights, they just want the feds to be the ones to violate them.

The group’s use of the term “limited hangout” refers to a tactic in which one reveals a bit of the truth in order to draw attention away from an underlying deception. It is a rhetorical sleight of hand intended to put their opponents at ease. After all, they might be anti-gunner zealots, but maybe they aren’t thatcrazy, right?

The truth is likely something far different. What could be happening here is that while they acknowledge that such an order might not be viable coming from a state government, the federal government might be given latitude to do so in the future.

Indeed, President Joe Biden and his merry band of anti-gunner Democrats have been trying desperately to pass radical and ridiculous gun restrictions ever since he took office. Since the makeup of Congress has not allowed them to advance this agenda, the White House has resorted to other means through executive orders and having the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives pursue other ways to curb gun rights.

This discussion highlights the ongoing struggle between states’ rights and federal authority. Should states retain the power to make these decisions, or should the federal government be empowered to impose one-size-fits-all-holsters mandates?

Of course, it is worth noting that if Democrats can get away with cracking down on gun rights at the state level, they will surely go this route just as they did in Illinois, New York, and California. However, Lujan Grisham’s order was pushing the issue further than the nation would accept, and the likes of Lieu and Hogg know this. So, in this vein, it would make sense for them to push back against it – even if it’s just for appearances.

Make no mistake, these people want to take your guns. They simply realize that they can’t go as far as Lujan Grisham has at this moment in time, although they would certainly like to. For this reason, it is important for liberty-minded people not to be fooled. These people mean business, and so should we.



Vivek Ramaswamy Says He Would Cut One Million Federal Employees


Ward Clark reporting for RedState 

2024 Republican Presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy has vowed, if elected, to reduce the federal workforce by one million.

Not bad, for a start.

In interviews with Axios and Semafor, Ramaswamy said he wanted to make drastic cuts to the federal government. He listed the FBI, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), the Department of Education, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the IRS, the Commerce Department and the USDA’s Food and Nutrition Services as potential subjects for the cuts.

The tech entrepreneur told Axios he wants to cut the federal civil workforce, which comprises 2.2 million people, by 75 percent after four years. He added he wants to see a 50 percent reduction by the end of his first year.

“Keep in mind that 30 percent of these employees are eligible for retirement in the next five-year period,” Ramaswamy said. “So it is substantial — no doubt about it — but it’s not as crazy as it sounds.”

No, it's not nearly as crazy as it sounds; the only thing questionable about it is that it doesn't go nearly far enough.  

The federal government is completely out of control. We, as a nation, are sitting under almost 33 trillion in national debt. Check out this morning's figures from the US National Debt Clock:

But we have enough, apparently, to send billions to Ukraine, and Congress, in general, doesn't seem to be taking the problem too seriously.

There can be no coming back from this without cutting spending. Not nibbling around the edges, not reducing the rate of increase (which Democrats always describe as "draconian spending cuts"). What is required is someone willing to swing a meat axe to completely eliminate extra-constitutional agencies.

Candidate Ramaswamy is making the right noises:

According to his campaign website, Ramaswamy aims to “dismantle managerial bureaucracy” by shutting down “toxic government agencies,” eliminating federal employee unions, moving more than 75 percent of federal employees out of Washington, D.C., and “cut wasteful expenditures.”

That's another good idea: Decentralize the federal government. This not only makes financial sense, but it also makes strategic sense; when Washington D.C. was established as the national capital, the country was a lot smaller than it is now, and foreign powers did not have the reach they do now. One of the advantages held by a nation as vast as ours is that we can make it difficult to strike a blow at the federal government all at once.

Ramaswamy is not the only candidate saying things along these lines:

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said he would cut the “footprint” of all D.C. federal agencies in half if he is elected to the White House in 2024. DeSantis has also suggested eliminating several federal agencies, including the IRS.

Eliminating federal agencies is not only desirable, but if the nation is ever to recover from this mountain of national debt, it may be mandatory. And it's likely to happen one way or another; better to do it now than to have emergency cuts made in extremis to stave off a default.

It remains to be seen whether any of these candidates, should they move into the White House, would be able to actually make any of this happen. There's too much graft money to be made in having the power to assign the seemingly endless flow of Uncle Sam's money, and there are too many local and even state constituencies with the tendency to vote for the candidate who promises the most of someone else's stuff; it's hard to run against Santa Claus.

The clock is ticking, and the next two or three election cycles have the potential to decide the course of the country's fiscal health. Candidates always talk big while on the trail. Vivek Ramaswamy is no exception. But he does have one interesting edge: Like Donald Trump, he's an outsider. He doesn't (yet) owe a lot of favors to the Swamp. But he would still have to deal with Congress. And that, folks, is the rub.



Impeaching Biden Is the Right Call, But Don’t Stop with Him


The corrupt FBI and DOJ officials who have been hiding evidence against Biden also need to be impeached and removed.



House Speaker Kevin McCarthy made the right decision to launch a formal impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden for what he called “serious and credible allegations into President Biden’s conduct,” which taken together paint a picture of a “culture of corruption” surrounding the president.

That’s correct as far as it goes, but it doesn’t go far enough. It won’t be enough simply to impeach Biden if GOP lawmakers don’t also go after the corrupt federal law enforcement agencies that have been hiding evidence against Biden, covering up his corruption, and obstructing investigations into the Biden family business. Indeed, the Justice Department and FBI’s involvement in all this is a much greater threat to America. 

Let’s start with what we do know. With apologies to Speaker McCarthy, the evidence uncovered thus far suggests much more than just a culture of corruption around Biden, but actual, straightforward corruption — foreign oligarchs allegedly bribing then-vice president Biden to make policy decisions that would benefit them. This wasn’t a complicated scheme. It involved overseas firms hiring or contracting with Biden’s son Hunter for access to Biden, and then laundering the money through a bunch of shell corporations. (Throwing money at Hunter was the best investment a corrupt foreign oligarch could ever make, it turns out.)

As my colleague Jordan Boyd chronicled back in July, dozens of people, including Hunter Biden’s former business partners, FBI and IRS whistleblowers, and at least one “highly credible” confidential FBI informant, have corroborated President Biden’s involvement in what amounts to a vast international bribery scheme. An impeachment inquiry is more than justified — there’s vastly more evidence of Biden’s corruption than there ever was of Trump’s, for example — and arguably it’s overdue. Biden is likely the most corrupt president in American history, and impeaching him is the lowest of the low-hanging fruit for the House GOP.

But all that’s just the tip of the iceberg. The Biden family corruption scheme goes right through the White House and out into the vast bureaucracy of the executive branch, reaching to the top echelons of Attorney General Merrick Garland’s Justice Department and a totally weaponized FBI.

For example, the confidential FBI informant’s claim that Burisma paid Hunter and Joe Biden $5 million each to get rid of a top Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Burisma was memorialized in an FBI FD-1023 report that the FBI withheld from Congress for months. That report, it seems, was buried by a select few DOJ lawyers and FBI agents, as Margot Cleveland explained in these pages last week, and hidden from the IRS investigators looking at Hunter Biden’s finances.

We know, too, that Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss, who slow-walked the Hunter Biden investigation for years, tried to sneak a sweetheart plea deal for Hunter past a federal judge — but got caught, which is why the plea agreement fell apart. The deal involved a pretrial diversion agreement (no jail time, no permanent record) on a gun charge that would have granted the president’s son blanket immunity from all future prosecution, including any crimes relating to his foreign influence-peddling operations.

This immunity provision was buried in Paragraph 15 of the diversion agreement, likely in hopes that U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika wouldn’t see it, or, if she did, would accept it rather than reject the entire plea deal, which is how the agreement was structured.

Keep in mind that the immunity provision, which would have effectively killed an ongoing investigation into Hunter Biden’s foreign business deals — deals which, despite his repeated denials, Joe Biden knew all about — wasn’t something proposed by Hunter’s defense team. It was offered up by Weiss and the DOJ.

Speaking of Weiss, whom Garland named special counsel last month, it seems he never had the authority to pursue the Hunter Biden investigation that Garland claimed he did. For more than a year, Garland insisted Weiss had “full authority” to investigate the president’s son and “to bring cases in other jurisdictions if he feels it’s necessary,” as he told the Senate Judiciary Committee in March and as Weiss himself later confirmed.

Garland and Weiss stuck to their story even after an IRS whistleblower revealed last October that Weiss had said he “is not the deciding person on whether charges are filed.” (After the transcript of the IRS whistleblower’s testimony was released, however, Weiss clarified that he meant Garland had promised he would be granted authority to make charging decisions, which as Cleveland noted last week isn’t quite the same as having the authority to begin with.)

All of this is by way of overview. The depth and breadth of the Justice Department and FBI involvement in protecting the Biden family might never be fully known — and it certainly won’t be known without a full impeachment inquiry, not just into Biden but also Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray.

The corruption of the Bidens is bad, but it’s nothing compared to the corruption of a weaponized deep state that’s willing to suppress evidence, intimidate whistleblowers, and trample the rule of law in order to keep a corrupt president in power. Voters can throw Biden out of office, but only an impeachment that results in the removal of top leadership in the DOJ and FBI, and the subsequent dismantling of those agencies, can protect the American people from what has become a tyrannical rogue government. 



WH in Full-On Desperation Mode With Letter to Press Demanding 'Scrutiny' of Impeachment Inquiry


Nick Arama reporting for RedState 

How old is the impeachment inquiry at this point? Barely a day and a half old?

But as I noted earlier, Democrats and liberal media already seem to be losing their minds in the effort to spin and deflect from the evidence. Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) torched a reporter laying out some of the evidence against Joe Biden as the media continued the fiction there was "no evidence" against him. Meanwhile, House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jerry Nadler (D-NY) was spinning madly about an FBI agent's testimony that added fuel to the fire that the probe into Hunter Biden had been slow-walked. 

Now, the White House is throwing away any pretense and, is in full-on desperation mode. They're no longer hiding the "memo" orders that they send out to the press asking for their action. The New York Post reported it as a "draft letter."


Biden’s White House is planning to send a letter to some of the country’s most prominent news organizations — including CNN, The New York Times, and Fox News — urging them to “ramp up their scrutiny” of House Republicans “for opening an impeachment inquiry based on lies.” [....]

In a draft letter to news executives obtained by CNN Tuesday, Ian Sams, a spokesperson for the White House Counsel’s Office, said the inquiry has no supporting evidence, which “should set off alarm bells for news organizations.”

This takes some gall from Sams: 

“Covering impeachment as a process story — Republicans say X, but the White House says Y — is a disservice to the American public who relies on the independent press to hold those in power accountable.

“And in the modern media environment, where everyday liars and hucksters peddle disinformation and lies everywhere from Facebook to FOX, process stories that fail to unpack the illegitimacy of the claims on which House Republicans are basing all their actions only serve to generate confusion, put false premises in people’s feeds and obscure the truth.”   [....]                                                            

“The House GOP investigations have turned up no evidence of wrongdoing by POTUS. In fact, their own witnesses have testified to that, and their own documents have showed no link to POTUS,” he claimed.

That's just straight-up false about Biden -- the GOP has found phone calls, emails, texts, and witnesses who have linked Biden to the business. Moreover, accusing anyone else of disinformation and "lies" in the wake of Joe Biden falsely claiming on the anniversary of 9/11 that he was at Ground Zero the day after the attack when that wasn't true doesn't hold a lot of water. He's the king of false stories. As we noted, he may even have plagiarized his description and swiped the day from Hillary Clinton who was at Ground Zero the day after the attack. 

But the planned letter was immediately blasted as directing the media how to come to the defense of Joe Biden, not doing its job ferreting out the truth in the interests of the American people. 

The letter is expected to go out to CNN, the New York Times, Fox News, the Associated Press and CBS News, a White House source informed CNN.

Journalist Matthew Keys was among the people blasting this news. 

"This is not okay. The White House should not be encouraging, influencing or interfering in the editorial strategies of America's newsrooms, including CNN and the New York Times," Keys said. “The problem is they’re trying to influence coverage,” Keys concluded. “The government should never do that. It is inappropriate.”

At this point, the White House and the Democrats treat the media like lapdog operatives and they know that many will simply comply with their "talking points."

But the fact that they're resorting to this now shows how worried they are about the inquiry. They have to know that it's over the target and may cost them the ball game regarding the election when everything comes out and the American people fully understand the Biden scandal. So this is why they're already demanding compliance from the media.