Mike Rowe Is on a Mission to Reverse the ‘Unspeakable Stupidity’ of Devaluing Work

“If you want to make America great again, 

you’ve got to make work cool again,” 

the mikeroweWORKS founder says.

by Salena Zito for American Greatness

A few months ago, Mike Rowe stumbled upon a 2011 video of himself speaking in front of the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee during the Obama Administration about the mindset of government toward skilled trades. His argument was that skilled trades were the key to saving our economy, not those jobs that require a four-year degree.

His argument fell on deaf ears.

So he went again in April 2014, this time testifying before the House Committee on Natural Resources to discuss the opportunities for skilled trade workers in the energy industry. This time he brought props, specifically the poster his guidance counselor from high school pointed to when he tried to bully Rowe into picking a high-priced university over a community college his senior year.

Rowe said he had nothing against college, but the universities his counselor recommended were expensive. “I had no idea what I wanted to study. I thought a community college made more sense, but Mr. Dunbar said a two-year school was ‘beneath my potential,'” explained Rowe.

“Mr. Dunbar pointed to a poster hanging behind his desk; on one side of the poster was a beaten-down, depressed-looking blue-collar worker. On the other side was an optimistic college graduate with his eyes on the horizon. Underneath them, the text read: Work Smart NOT Hard,” Rowe told the committee.

“Mike, look at these two guys,” Mr. Dunbar said. “Which one do you want to be?”

“I had to read the caption twice. Work Smart NOT Hard?” Rowe recounted.

The visual was jarring, not to mention insulting, yet once again, nothing happened.

Rowe made his final plea to Congress in March 2017 when he once again schlepped to Capitol Hill, this time for the House Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education. He discussed how career and technical education (CTE) can help close the skills gap and empower students to succeed, and he stressed the need to reform the current law.

His message was simple: CTE, and skilled trade professions, need a public relations makeover and a champion. “If you want to make America great again, you’ve got to make work cool again,” he said.

“So, my point to Congress was we just have to get people to think differently about the definition of a good job. And we need to put better examples of real people out there who are prospering as the result of learning a trade,” he said.

“We just shot seven or eight PSAs a couple months ago with people who we helped through the trade scholarship fund at the foundation. HVAC workers, plumbers, welders, all making six figures, and I am going to put these PSAs out there in the same spirit of those ads that made people think differently about conservation, and we are going to make people think differently about work,” he said.

The spots are pitch perfect. The first one with Chloe Hudson begins with Rowe dispelling the notion that you cannot make six figures working with your hands. It then cuts to Hudson, a welder who received a work ethic scholarship from mikeroweWORKS and went on to earn six figures a year, talking about the beauty of her life.

“I’m going to raise whatever I have to, I’m going to spend whatever I have to get these examples front and center. So that’s what I’ve got. In a way, it’s nothing new. In another way, it’s me finally saying, ‘Look, this was a good idea 10 years ago, and why not me?’ I’ll do it. I’m going to do it,” Rowe says with his characteristic charm that has endeared him to millions for more than 20 years.

Rowe said people really need to acknowledge the “unspeakable stupidity” of taking shop classes out of high schools 40 years ago. “The unintended consequences of that alone have been unraveling in ways that’s just mind-boggling. We effectively removed from view an entire category of vocations,” he said.

“In the long history of stupidity, you’d have to go a long way to find something dumber than universally removing shop class from high school. But of course, at the same time we did that, we started telling that same generation of kids that the best path for the most people was the most expensive path,” he said of the idea that higher education is the only path to success.

Which brings Rowe to wonder: Were they intentionally telling students who went into trades that they were achieving lower education?

It should make us wonder as well: Who did these decision-makers think was going to take care of their plumbing, fix their car, install their air conditioning, repair their furnace or rewire their house? 

Rowe said he knows he is not going to open the eyes of the varsity blues crowd. “I can’t. They’re not persuadable. But there are a lot of people in the middle, a lot of people that just want to feel better about the possibility of exploring a career. So that’s what I’m going to do. I’m going to take my own advice. I’m going to stop telling Congress what to do, and I’m going to do it myself,” he said.

Christian Patriot News, And we Know, and more- June 6

 

Entertainment news of the day:

Last night, a miniscule half of the Screen Actors Guild of America (or SAG-AFTRA as most call them) voted to authorize a strike next month if they can't reach a deal on new contracts before this month ends. Meaning that that they will join their spoiled losers of the WGA on the so called 'PICKET LINES' if they don't have a new deal by the end of this month.

I'm not really intimidated by this. Reliable sources tell me that more then half that union never even voted, which tells me that most members would rather have a deal made then waste their time trying to act all 'tough' trying to fight people who aren't even 'suffering' all that much in their pocket books from the WGA being on strike. And that the only ones who voted are more then likely the rich snobs who can live for months without working.

It'll be interesting to see how this turns out throughout the month.

Modern History Books vs. A.I. on Trump’s Presidency

Artificial intelligence offers a far more accurate account of President Trump’s term than the officially sanctioned history books.

by Rod Thomson for American Greatness

It’s a pretty telling state of institutional affairs when multiple left-biased artificial intelligence platforms offer a more accurate depiction of Donald Trump’s presidency than the history books now populating America’s high schools. And it’s not even close. 

According to an investigative report from conservative Greg Price on his Substack, Advanced Placement U.S. History (APUSH) textbooks cover Trump’s term at an almost propagandistic level. 

For instance, Price writes, 

nearly all of the textbooks claim ‘Russian meddling’ was responsible for the 2016 election of Donald Trump, despite that narrative being debunked through multiple studies and news reports . . . They also leave out all the details of how the Trump/Russia media narrative unraveled. None of them mention the phony Steele dossier, how the FBI abused FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) to spy on Trump, the illegal unmasking of Michael Flynn, how officials like John Brennan, James Clapper, and Rep. Adam Schiff lied to the public about Russian collusion, or the role Hillary Clinton’s campaign played in feeding false Trump/Russia stories to the press.

The so-called “history” books do, however, provide in-depth coverage of unproven sexual misconduct allegations against both President Trump and Justice Clarence Thomas, but completely memory-hole the entirety of the sexual allegations against President Clinton. This propaganda against Trump and the Right is repeated for every issue. 

So I asked ChatGPT to write an essay on Donald Trump’s presidency. Admittedly, the answers are far shorter than the materials in history books, but the results are telling. Here’s what it provided (edited for length, not content): 

On Trump’s Economic Policies

“One of the central tenets of President Trump’s presidency was his focus on the economy. His administration implemented several measures aimed at stimulating economic growth, such as tax cuts and deregulation. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 reduced corporate tax rates and provided temporary individual tax relief. While this policy bolstered business confidence and contributed to economic expansion, critics argued that it primarily benefited the wealthy.”

On His Foreign Policy

“President Trump adopted an unconventional approach to foreign policy, challenging long standing norms. He prioritized an ‘America First’ agenda, seeking to renegotiate international trade agreements to protect American interests. Additionally, the Trump administration pursued a policy of maximum pressure on nations like Iran and North Korea, which resulted in a mixed outcome.”

Trump’s Social and Cultural Impact

“President Trump’s presidency ignited heated debates on social and cultural issues. His administration’s immigration policies, such as the travel ban on several predominantly Muslim countries, sparked controversy and were met with widespread criticism. Trump’s rhetoric, particularly on issues of race and ethnicity, was divisive and exacerbated existing societal divisions. Critics argued that his statements and actions undermined the values of inclusivity and equality.”

On His Leadership Style

“President Trump’s leadership style was characterized by his outspokenness, frequent use of social media, and unfiltered public statements. While some admired his directness and perceived authenticity, others criticized his lack of diplomacy and the potential consequences of his impulsive decisions.”

In Conclusion

“President Donald Trump’s presidency left an indelible mark on American history. His policy decisions, unconventional approach to governance, and rhetoric generated intense debates and sparked both fervent support and passionate opposition. While his economic policies spurred growth and his foreign policy approach challenged established norms, concerns were raised regarding his impact on social cohesion and the erosion of democratic norms.” 

I asked Bard the same question. Here is how it responded:

“Donald Trump’s presidency was a turbulent one, marked by both controversy and accomplishment. He was the first president without prior military or governmental service, and his policies often reflected his own personal beliefs and business interests. 

“One of Trump’s most significant accomplishments was the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. This law reduced taxes for businesses and individuals, and it is estimated to have added trillions of dollars to the national debt. Trump also appointed two conservative justices to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. These appointments will have a lasting impact on American law and society. 

“However, Trump’s presidency was also marked by controversy. He was impeached by the House of Representatives in 2019 for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, but he was acquitted by the Senate. He was also accused of racism, sexism, and xenophobia. His policies on immigration, healthcare, and climate change were also controversial. 

“Here are some of the key accomplishments and controversies of Trump’s presidency:

Accomplishments

•     Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017
•     Appointed two conservative justices to the Supreme Court
•     Negotiated new trade deals with Mexico, Canada, and China
•     Reduced regulations on businesses
•     Normalized relations with North Korea 

Controversies

•     Impeachment by the House of Representatives
•     Accusations of racism, sexism, and xenophobia
•     Divisive rhetoric
•     Policies on immigration, healthcare, and climate change
•     Refusal to concede the 2020 election
•     Insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021”

The AI answers are obviously biased. But Price’s investigation into the AP history books revealed outright propaganda on the part of the creators of those books. This continues the indictment of public education in America. From transgenderism and critical race theory to history revision, the reality is that honest Americans cannot trust their children to the public schools. 

As a bonus, I asked ChatGPT to give the reasons why Trump won in 2016. Here’s an incredibly fair answer: 

• Economic anxiety: Many voters were concerned about the state of the economy and felt that Trump would be better able to improve their lives than Clinton.
• Dissatisfaction with the political establishment: Many voters were frustrated with the status quo and felt that Trump was an outsider who would shake things up.
• Clinton’s unpopularity: Clinton was a very unpopular candidate, and many voters simply did not like her.
• Trump’s appeal to white working-class voters: Trump was able to connect with white working-class voters who felt that they had been left behind by the economic recovery.
• Clinton’s missteps: Clinton made a number of missteps during the campaign, such as her use of a private email server while she was Secretary of State. 

That is by far a more accurate summary than can be found in any legacy media or history books. Note the absence of any reference to “Russian collusion.” 

How bad is the state of education in America when beta A.I. models provide a more accurate history than the officially sanctioned history books? Asked and answered.

The Culture War Is the Class War. We Need To Win Both

posted by Pedro L. Gonzalez at Newsweek 

There is a perennial claim that the culture war distracts from the economic issues that drive American politics. It's a point where Democrats and Republicans often find themselves in rare agreement. Many Democrats feel a cultural leftward drift helps their political prospects in the long run, while too many Republican leaders don't have the stomach for the fight.

But the class and culture wars are not mutually exclusive; they are twins joined in utero. Culture war issues often and at once reflect both the class interest and sincerely held beliefs of liberal elites. As a result, it is becoming increasingly difficult to disentangle these battles.

The rumble in Florida between Governor Ron DeSantis and Disney is illustrative because it pits one of the most powerful corporations in the world against a state government.

The row began when Disney first denounced and then made it its mission to overturn Florida's HB 1557, also known as the Parental Rights in Education Act, which prohibited teaching about sexual orientation and gender identity to children third grade or younger.

"Our goal as a company is for this law to be repealed by the legislature or struck down in the courts, and we remain committed to supporting the national and state organizations working to achieve that," the company said in a statement. "We are dedicated to standing up for the rights and safety of LGBTQ+ members of the Disney family, as well as the LGBTQ+ community in Florida and across the country."

But Disney's problem is that the legislation enjoyed broad support. The company wasn't standing with Floridians but against them.

A poll by Public Opinion Strategies found 70 percent of registered Republicans, 58 percent of independents, and 55 percent of Democrats agreed with this critical part of the bill: "Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through third grade or in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards."

The act has since been expanded to include all grades.

Disney put itself on the wrong side of everyday Americans. And when the company did not get its way, it resorted to economic warfare against the state, threatening to withhold donations to political campaigns in retaliation and portraying supporters of the legislation as bigots. Disney owes much of its success to the generosity of Floridians, who have been willing to grant the entertainment giant numerous privileges and perks. But at that moment, the corporation effectively declared itself suzerain, and a supposedly frivolous culture war fight became a question of who rules: Disney or the people of Florida?

The governor came down on the side of the latter. That should have been a political death sentence, according to the naysayers. Instead, DeSantis defeated his Democratic opponent in the Florida gubernatorial race by a 15 point margin.

That might be because many Americans, certainly most Republican voters, instinctively understand that the culture war is ultimately a struggle for power between competing visions of America, directly impacting everything from education to economics, foreign policy to the environment.

Recall that last year, West Virginia State Treasurer Riley Moore barred several banks from doing business with the state because they had stopped financing the coal industry. Coal is West Virginia's top export. The green policies promoted by these institutions, which are part of the culture war, directly threaten the livelihoods of blue-collar workers.

But it is not enough to lazily declare things "woke." Leaders must fight these battles with prudence and effectively articulate and frame the issues, as DeSantis has done in Florida and others have done elsewhere. 

Conservatives Can’t Afford To Get Distracted By The 2024 Primary

Shawn Fleetwood reporting for The Federalist

Since Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis officially jumped into the 2024 GOP presidential primary, the Republican Twittersphere has devolved into a giant cluster of insanity.

Take a trip to your favorite right-wing account, and you’re likely to find an untold number of tweets trashing either former President Donald Trump or DeSantis, accompanied by a lengthy explanation of why his or her preferred candidate will be the one to take down Joe Biden in the 2024 general election. The back-and-forth between Trump and DeSantis supporters — which continued into Memorial Day, a day when we’re supposed to honor those who have paid the ultimate price for our freedoms — has largely lacked any real substance. The insults thrown around have become so petty and personal, it feels like watching an episode of “Keeping Up with the Kardashians.”

While it’s completely understandable to be on the lookout for a potential nominee given Biden’s disastrous presidency thus far, overzealously focusing on a primary we won’t be voting in until February, at the earliest, distracts from current issues and plays into Democrats’ hands. There will be plenty of time between now and then to decide who becomes the 2024 GOP presidential candidate. But that time is not right now.

At this given moment, we have highly-politicized U.S. intel agencies targeting conservatives and protecting Democrats, federal departments and left-wing nonprofits interfering in our elections, an establishment trying to drag us into World War III, major corporations glorifying gender dysphoria, so-called “red” states acting like blue states, leftists indoctrinating and “trans-ing” children, a Congress spending taxpayer money like drunken Marxists, a wide open southern border, Democrats attempting to destroy the Supreme Court, an inflated economy, and a dying military.

This is not to mention major off-year elections in Louisiana, Mississippi, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and New Jersey this fall, several of which will be critical in determining the fate of issues such as election integrity, abortion, and biological reality, just to name a few. If Democrats learned anything from this year’s Wisconsin Supreme Court race, it’s that dangling presidential politics in front of Republican voters is a winning strategy.

The left would love nothing more than for conservatives to get caught up in the “My candidate’s better than yours!” drama of the 2024 GOP presidential primary for the next year. The right getting bogged down in the “Orange Man vs. Florida Man” showdown gives Democrats a free ticket to further ram their radical agenda down Americans’ throats unchallenged.

1st press reporting of 'Paris Christmas Waltz' 🌲

 

Source: https://deadline.com/2023/06/the-christmas-waltz-movie-hallmark-moves-to-great-american-family-matthew-morrison-jen-lilly-star-1235409587/

A holiday movie franchise that got its start at Hallmark is moving to Great American Family.

Michael and Janeen Damian, who were responsible for Hallmark’s 2020 film The Christmas Waltz that starred Lacey Chabert and Will Kemp, will produce a sequel for Great American Family’s Great American Christmas programming block. Dubbed Paris Christmas Waltz, the new holiday flick will star Matthew Morrison (Glee) and Jen Lilley (B&B Merry, Days of Our Lives).

It was shot on location in Paris and promises to “sweep viewers into the magic of the city’s most iconic destinations.” In Paris Christmas Waltz, Emma (Lilley) relinquishes her job so a colleague with a family will keep his. Contemplating life’s next steps, Emma meets a professional dancer, Leo (Morrison), whose love for competitive dancing is waning, until a once in a lifetime opportunity arises for the novice to join the pro and sweep all of Paris off of its feet.

Great American Christmas returns Oct. 21 with new holiday movie premieres every Saturday and Sunday and 24/7 Christmas movies through the end of the year. 

Michael Damian, who is best known for his role as Danny Romalotti on The Young and the Restless, has collaborated on 17 original movies with his wife Janeen, including the highest-rated holiday film of 2020, The Christmas Waltz. The prolific team wrote all 17 films together with Michael Damian directing all except Falling for Christmas and Irish Wish, which Janeen Damian helmed.

The pair is also behind the Great American Christmas hit of 2021, A Hot Cocoa Christmas.

Paris Christmas Waltz is executive produced by Brad Krevoy, Amy Krell, Jimmy Townsend, and Lorenzo Nardini. Janeen Damian produces. Michael Damian directs from an original screenplay by Janeen Damia.

Gavin Newsom Wants to Charge Ron DeSantis With Kidnapping

Bonchie reporting for RedState 

Gavin Newsom just can’t stop talking about Ron DeSantis, and that boiled over with a suggestion that the latter should be charged with kidnapping on Monday.

As RedState reported, a flight carrying a small number of illegal immigrants wound up in California recently, setting off a firestorm of accusations against the 2024 presidential candidate. The flight reportedly originated in New Mexico after the illegal immigrants were bussed in from El Paso, TX, one of the hottest areas of the Southern border for crossings.

Newsom immediately expressed his outrage, announcing a joint investigation with the California DOJ while claiming that DeSantis could face kidnapping charges.

What an odd response from a man who claims to welcome illegal immigrants with open arms. If someone sent you something you claim is a positive force for good, would you call the person giving it to you a “small, pathetic man?” I wouldn’t think so, which points to the idea that Newsom’s bluster in support of illegal immigration is actually just NIMBY virtue signaling. It’s all well and good until they end up in your backyard. Then it’s a travesty that demands a state investigation. How very convenient, right?

Let’s take a trip down memory lane at what Newsom was saying about illegal immigrants in 2018.

Now, I’m not the smartest tool in the shed, but I’m pretty sure that if you pronounce your state a sanctuary for illegal immigration, you probably shouldn’t cry foul when a few of them are flown in to take part in the hospitality. Why is Newsom now acting like illegal immigrants being in California is an issue? He’s long expressed the idea that they are needed to do jobs, specifically in the agricultural parts of his state. Did something change? Shouldn’t he be sending DeSantis, if he’s behind this flight, a thank you note?

Regardless, the problem with Newsom’s threat is easy to discern. You can’t charge someone with kidnapping for giving people voluntary rides. These illegal immigrants were likely living on the streets of El Paso after crossing the border. An offer to go to a self-proclaimed refuge like California, where sanctuary status is the norm across the entire state, would likely entice anyone who wasn’t already meeting up with family elsewhere. They wouldn’t need to be lied to or coerced, and as far as I can tell, there’s no real evidence they were.

The fact remains that Texas simply can’t continue to absorb the sheer number of illegal immigrants coming across. It is completely fair for sanctuary cities and states to start taking on the burden of policies they promoted for years. The first place illegal immigrants should be sent is California given the state has been on the leading edge of flaunting federal immigration law.

As to DeSantis, he’s not going to face kidnapping charges because no one was kidnapped. Heck, Newsom’s suggestion that people would need to be forced to go to California seems rather self-defeating. In the end, if he and the rest of the Democratic Party don’t want to deal with illegal immigrants in their communities, they are welcome to start enforcing immigration law. Until then, keep the buses and flights going.

HHS Spent $13 Billion Sponsoring And Losing Migrant Kids Over The Last Decade

Samuel Boehlke reporting for The Federalist

The Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) has spent more than $13 billion sponsoring unaccompanied minors at the United States border since 2012, according to recent reporting from OpenTheBooks.com. This staggering figure is even worse in the context of a shocking February report from The New York Times, which revealed that while HHS follows up with minors one month after their sponsor placements, the department has been unable to get ahold of at least 85,000 children in just the past two years.

Unaccompanied children are defined by the ORR as those under the age of 18 with “no lawful immigration status in the United States” and no parent or legal guardian to “provide care and physical custody.” The Unaccompanied Children (UC) program places minors attempting to enter the U.S. with state-licensed sponsors in an attempt to avoid the high risk of exploitation children face in Mexican border towns.

This year, the ORR spent $2.7 billion to sponsor unaccompanied minors at a rate of $18,000 per child. For reference, the cost to educate per student in Texas, where most of the UC program spending occurs, is $9,871.

Recent reports show the ORR losing track of some children as quickly as one month after placement. ORR policy is to call a child at their placement to ensure their well-being after a month, but over the last two years, the agency failed to reach more than 85,000 children.

At their sponsorships across the country, many unaccompanied children across the country are “part of a new economy of exploitation,” overworked to “exhaustion,” and “juggle classes and heavy workloads” or “will not be enrolled in school,” according to the Times.

Under pressure to send money to their families, unaccompanied children are “often [] in debt” to the same sponsors who have been found and vetted by the ORR with taxpayer dollars.

Due to the sheer number of incoming children, the HHS hires child welfare agencies to track down “some minors who are deemed to be at high risk. But caseworkers at those agencies said that HHS regularly ignored obvious signs of labor exploitation.”

Recently HHS has faced pressure from a Florida grand jury and the HHS Inspector General, both of which raised concerns about the mistreatment of unaccompanied children at the border. Further, an IG report challenged HHS employee vetting processes, while the grand jury concluded the department was “facilitating the forced migration, sale, and abuse of foreign children.”

The department’s response? In March, HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra said he was “unfamiliar” with the reported statistics of missing children and that their “authorities end” when a sponsor is found.

At the time of writing, the HHS Administration for Children and Families has not responded to a request for comment regarding their efforts to find these children or remove abusive sponsors from their system.

Leftist White Women: The World's Most Dangerous Predator

posted by Brandon Morse at RedStateVIP 

The vibrant and magnificent landscapes of the Western World are home to the most diverse subsects of homo-sapiens in the world. From the noisy inner cities to the relative quiet of the suburbs, a rich cornucopia of subcultures can be found living and working alongside one another.

There’s the sterile and busy corporate ladder climber, the easy-going but hard-working blue-collar worker. Peering into every town, you may find the nerdy but loveable geek or the driven and motivated gym rat. Down the dirt road, you can find the good-natured but highly opinionated rancher, and flying above him in the sky is the commercial pilot, carrying a litany of humanity’s variants to and fro.

However, these peaceful people who live peaceful lives do not live wholly among the peaceful. Deep within the shadows of suburbia, a predator prowls. While the wilds outside of human civilization may contain many dangers, none can hold a candle to the greatest predator of them all; the leftist white woman.

The leftist white woman is a female of the human species that, for some unexplainable reason, believes itself to be smarter, morally superior, and just all-around better than everyone else. This firm belief in their own self-importance leads them to push their positions on the rest of humanity. Driven by their own chronic unhappiness, their unyielding need for control, and their hatred for anything that stands in their way make them a dangerous part of any community.

While the leftist white woman is statistically the most common kind of white woman in the Western world, most within the leftist white female subsect are what could be referred to as “non-practicing” leftists. They claim to support whatever the mainstream culture sells them to and really don’t give too much thought to politics outside of what celebrities tell them to pay attention to. Critical thought isn’t something they regularly engage in and that’s part of what makes them so dangerous. They will blindly agree to nearly any social position after hearing a few buzzwords about it from trusted figures, and pull the lever for Democrats because that’s just what they’re supposed to do. This variation of the white leftist woman has been a huge help to Democrats, allowing them to win big elections on more than one occasion.

But the undisputed danger lurking among them is the white leftist female activist.

Heavily biased to leftist causes and self-assured of her own intellectual and moral supremacy, the white leftist female activist will turn a paradise into a living hell once it moves into an area. You may be very aware of some of the most fierce activists whose predatory natures are so infamous that they make headlines.

Randi Weingarten can arguably be considered one of the most horrific among them. Weingarten is the head of the American Federation of Teachers, the second largest teacher’s union in the nation. Weingarten radicalism has had some frightening results, including unnecessarily keeping children away from schools during the pandemic and forcing them to wear masks when they were there. Under Weingarten’s leadership, the NEA attempted to radicalize children’s curriculum, including introducing LGBT and CRT content into lessons. Weingarten claims to be an educator, but she’s all activist and the truth can be seen in how she doesn’t understand anything from science to basic history.

LA County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath has recently made the news by attempting to force LGBT extremism into every aspect of people’s lives she can. Whether it’s dancing with children in a West Hollywood Pride Parade that featured a nearly naked man being choked with a whip or strong-arming the LA Dodgers into accepting an anti-Christian hate group that heavily introduces crude sexuality into its demonstrations on their field for a “Pride Night.” Horvath barely qualifies as a politician, but she is 100 percent a radical leftist activist.

The white leftist female activist has unwavering beliefs that astound mental health professionals who aren’t activists themselves. She lives in “her truth” and will not deviate from this version of the truth, even if the facts defy her version of reality. She is the arbiter of “real.” She is Thanos with the reality stone.

Watch as these white women argue with a man about simple biology. The man states the simple fact that XY and XX chromosomes define sex and gender and that men cannot menstruate. These white women do their absolute best to tell him he’s wrong despite there being no scientific evidence to back their white leftist female activist claims.

While watching them get steamrolled by people who won’t back down is fun, these women influence quite a few people to sign on with their distorted and bizarre beliefs, especially younger white women, a group who suffers from their delusions the most.

In fact, you’ll find that the primary prey of the white leftist female activist is human children. They lurk in the shadows until a child is left unguarded such as without their parent in a school or when they’re on social media, and strike with overbearing influence, gaslighting, forced guilt, and other forms of manipulation. Many children have suffered at the hands of these predators in a variety of ways, from developing their own mental illnesses to being left physically vulnerable to sexual predators in the name of “inclusion” and “acceptance.”

To that end, part of what makes the white leftist woman so dangerous is the fact that she facilitates other kinds of predators to expand their territory and hunt in the open.

How can they do this in good conscience? The inner workings of the white leftist female activist are unknown, but a Pew Research study found that a whopping 50 percent of leftist women have some form of mental health issue.

(READ: ‘Reporter’ Provides Exhibit B on How Woke Women Will Be the Downfall of Our Society)

As RedState previously reported, leftism and mental illness seem to go hand-in-hand, but at 50 percent, the problem is more pervasive for white leftist women.

It’s a subspecies of human that is clearly dangerous, unstable, and capable of great evil.

Beware the weaponized delusions of the white leftist woman.