Tuesday, May 30, 2023

Three Years Later, No Justice for BLM Insurrection in D.C.

D.C.’s lead prosecutor has turned a blind eye to a six-month campaign of terror in the nation’s capital in 2020 so he could keep his sights on the mostly nonviolent protesters of January 6, 2021.


“Our office prosecutes all acts of violence, regardless of political motivation, the same.”

So said U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Matthew Graves—under oath, mind you, and with a straight face—during a hearing of the House Oversight Committee earlier this month. 

Representative Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) questioned Graves’ disparate treatment of Black Lives Matters rioters who terrorized Washington, D.C., in 2020 versus Trump supporters involved in the events of January 6, 2021.

Although the start of both incidents was a mere seven months apart, they are a world away in terms of accountability. 

In what Graves calls the “Capitol Siege” investigation, more than 1,000 Trump supporters have been criminally charged. Graves, a Biden appointee, has promised to double that caseload before he’s finished. His office announces new arrests every week.

That, however, is not the case for rioters who caused far more violence and inflicted far more damage in the nation’s capital in 2020. The rioting that began on May 29, 2020 at Lafayette Square prompted the lockdown of the White House; Donald Trump, his wife, and teenage son were ushered to an underground bunker for their safety as looters and arsonists repeatedly tried to scale the fence and break through police barricades erected outside the White House.

And what started that night in 2020 didn’t just last a few hours, as was the case with the Capitol protest. On June 1, rioters burned part of St. John’s Church, an historical landmark across from the White House, and set ablaze other areas of the public park.

Chaos continued throughout the summer with the president, his family, and White House staff under constant threat. Police arrested 11 people at Lafayette Square in July 2020 for various offenses including assault of a police officer. “The Tuesday night incidents that stretched over hours are the latest confrontations to transpire near the White House, where protesters have been gathering daily for more than a month to protest for racial justice after the killing of George Floyd in the custody of Minneapolis police,” the Washington Post reported on July 8, 2020.

After Trump accepted the GOP nomination for president on White House grounds in August 2020, rioters chased Republican lawmakers, including Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and his wife, leaving the event. Some assaulted police in an attempt to get near members of Congress; Rep. Brian Mast (R-Fla.), who lost both legs and a finger in Afghanistan, was surrounded and shouted down by Black Lives Matter protesters as he tried to get home.

Elected officials weren’t the only targets of rage-filled activists occupying the heart of the nation’s capital that year. Trump supporters, including young families with children, were attacked by BLM and Antifa rioters during pro-Trump rallies in November and December 2020.

But the violent demonstrations at Lafayette Square represent the closest comparison to January 6: clashes between federal police and protesters on federal property. An Interior Department inspector general report detailed the turbulent situation at Lafayette Square that endangered police and the president for days 

[The] Treasury Annex building was vandalized; officers were assaulted with projectiles, such as bottles and bricks; and a brick struck a [U.S. Park Police] officer in the head, resulting in the officer’s hospitalization. USPP officers reported that some protesters threw projectiles, such as bricks, rocks, caustic liquids, frozen water bottles, glass bottles, lit flares, rental scooters, and fireworks, at law enforcement officials. Overall, 49 USPP officers were injured during the protests from May 29 to May 31, including one who underwent surgery for his injuries. The Secret Service—also reported injuries to their personnel during this time. On the evening of May 30, individuals at the protests threw projectiles at the officers and ultimately breached the first row of bike-rack fencing, thereby eliminating the buffer between the protesters and law enforcement officers.

Dozens of people were arrested, including a man who jumped over two barriers in an attempt to enter the White House. Yet only a handful of protesters faced federal charges—in sharp contrast to January 6 protesters who all face federal counts even for low-level offenses such as “parading” in the Capitol. Nearly all the charges initially filed by the D.C. U.S. Attorney’s office were dropped. (Graves did not take over the office until November 2021.)

Despite his claim his office is “prosecuting a number of individuals in connection with the incidents of the summer of 2020,” that simply does not appear to be the case, particularly since Graves further confirmed to Gosar that the office “declined a number of arrests presented to it under the leadership of the prior administration.”

But a change in political leadership does not absolve Graves from failing to bring federal charges against violent criminals who tried to destroy the nation’s capital in 2020. If Graves can indict nonviolent individuals for “seditious conspiracy” who did little more than make travel plans to attend political rallies on January 6, he could easily find more damning evidence against deep-pocketed organizers who encouraged thousands of rioters to occupy D.C. for months, threaten the president, traumatize residents and businesses, assault federal police, and intimidate Republican lawmakers and voters in the seat of American government—a legitimate “insurrection.”

Not only has Graves not charged any suspects involved in the 2020 riots under his watch, but his office also helped negotiate a settlement between the Justice Department and Lafayette Square rioters, who sued the government for violating their civil rights during what Graves called “racial justice demonstrations in Lafayette Square.” The settlement with Black Lives Matter D.C. required Park Police and Secret Service to update their policies to protect those who “peacefully exercise their First Amendment rights.”

First Amendment rights these days are in the eye of the beholder—or in this case, the lead government prosecutor who decided to turn a blind eye to a six-month campaign of terror in the nation’s capital in 2020 so he could keep his sights on people who participated in a mostly nonviolent, comparatively brief protest on January 6.

Clearly, all “sieges” are not created equal.



X22, And we Know, and more- May 30

 




Republican Voters Don’t Want a Trump Knockoff

It comes down to this: DeSantis is just not presidential material.


Republican voters have been bashed over the head repeatedly with the message that Ron DeSantis is the more “electable,” new and improved version of Donald Trump. This was always a ridiculous talking point, as if an enigmatic figure such as Trump could be replicated, with all peculiar virtues retained and vices purged. But this shtick for DeSantis had life only so long as it remained an untested hypothesis. Under the pressure of a head-on collision with Trump, the careful ruse of “Trump without the baggage” is collapsing like a cardboard cutout. 

DeSantis’ disastrous Twitter launch, rationalized as bold and forward thinking by his supporters, is just the tip of the iceberg. The problem is DeSantis is lacking quite a bit more than Trump’s “baggage.” Without his rival’s authenticity or charisma, DeSantis has relied on an annoyingly overbearing political operation to stay afloat. But sly maneuvering is precisely what Republican voters despise most in a politician today. Oddly enough, DeSantis appears to have even changed how he says his last name. One can imagine Trump having a field day with his understudy’s prevarications on the debate stage: “Tell us, Ron, Is it Duh-santis or DEE-santis?” 

DeSantis’ surrogates want to talk about nothing but “policy,” perhaps as a distraction from the fact that he’s such an uninteresting character. It’s hard to trust a man who isn’t comfortable in his own skin. One could hardly lay such a charge against Trump. His supporters know that the chaos is part of a package deal that comes with a forceful and uncontrollable personality. With DeSantis, they get a boring, vacillating careerist pretending to be his more popular rival. The premise here was bound to end in failure once the rubber hit the road. 

Although his crudely obvious shadow campaign has reached a merciful conclusion, now that it’s “official,” DeSantis’ candidacy feels like old news. The only difference is that the talking points voters have heard countless times already from Twitter pundits and Fox News and the editorial pages of the New York Post are coming from the governor’s own mouth. He ended his astroturfed Twitter launch by thanking apparently handpicked interlocutors for a “robust debate.” It was a strange way to summarize what had just transpired: listeners heard DeSantis read stale talking points for an hour as allies teed up softball questions on his favorite topics. Then he hopped over to Murdoch-owned Fox News to be flattered some more by the weirdly affected Trey Gowdy. Asked how he would handle the war in Ukraine, DeSantis appeared to blow a circuit and started talking about transgenders in the military. “There’s a new sheriff in town,” he declared. This is the serious, substantial candidate we’ve heard so much about? 

DeSantis has thrived in isolation, and it shows. His rather holier than thou surrogates and sympathizers are in denial about his increasingly apparent weaknesses. They hector Trump “cultists” for failing to be awed by “Trump without the baggage” (who’s in a cult, again?) and disparage Trump supporters as rubes who just want to be entertained. But personality matters a lot in politics, not just for winning elections, but governing too. 

America is in deep trouble. Rebuilding a declining country, if it is possible, will require leaders who can actually inspire people. Trump is the creator and leader of a historic popular movement. Not many people have that capability. DeSantis obviously doesn’t, which is why he has tried to co-opt MAGA for his own personal ambitions.

It is one thing to stab a man in the front, and quite another to borrow his personality and then stab him in the back. Being Trump’s shadow, “Ron DeSantis” could not delay forever a Shakespearean leap of hubris. Will his ambitions survive it? The polls suggest not. Intuition gives the same reply: “Trump without the baggage” is not equipped to replace his model and benefactor. 



Elon Levels Liberal Matt Yglesias With a Question About Free Speech He Can't Answer

Elon Levels Liberal Matt Yglesias With a Question About Free Speech He Can't Answer

Nick Arama reporting for RedState 

Earlier this month, columnist Matty Yglesias and Twitter owner Elon Musk had a throwdown over free speech.

Turkey threatened to ban Twitter. Twitter had to choose between complying with Turkish law and being available in that country, giving people at least some voice before the election, or being shut down and unavailable to everyone.

But it appears that Yglesias hasn’t learned his lesson yet and is at it again.

He’s a free-speech absolutist? Funny how I don’t seem to recall Matty wading into the fray to call out Twitter 1.0 when it was suppressing people who questioned the prevailing liberal narrative.

That was real censorship that Democrats could weigh in on. But not only didn’t they fight the censorship, they attacked the people who revealed it like Musk and the Twitter Files journalists.

Musk lost some patience when he had to school him.

“You’re such a numbskull. Please point out where we had an actual choice and we will reverse it,” Elon said.

The point Musk is making is he has to act in accordance with the laws of whatever country Twitter is operating in, not all of whom have the same approach to free speech as the United States, or Twitter and its employees are in danger of arrest/getting booted completely, for everyone. Then there is no Twitter speech at all, for anyone.

But Yglesias kept digging in.

People including Elon asked Yglesias to answer Musk’s question, but he wouldn’t.

He just can’t deal with the reality of the question.

He did seem to get that he posts “slow boring” content, though.

What’s ironic is the nerve of Yglesias to try to call out Musk here. What has Yglesisas ever put on the line for free speech? Musk put himself on the line, big time, when it comes to free speech, taking a position that he knew would antagonize the powers that be and make big-time enemies of the Democrats. He brought back people censored by Twitter 1.0 and revealed the things that went on to suppress speech with the Twitter Files. He probably also overpaid with the $44 billion he spent to acquire Twitter to stick by those principles and create the town square for all.

In many ways, Musk put a target on his back in the eyes of the left. The site may not be perfect, but one of the other things that’s great is that Musk also has to be one of the most open owners of a corporation ever with how he responds to questions/concerns, even here, with Yglesias’ comments. What other head of a company has ever responded in such a way? I’m not sure I can think of one.



The Odd Questions Never Asked About the DeSantis Operation – a Florida Grassroots Activist Explains

posted by Sundance at Conservative Treehouse 

It always puzzles me when I come across an obscure data point that comes directly from the mouths of people who follow politics, and yet watch them not ask the obvious question.  In this video segment, the first 20 seconds by podcaster Patrick Bet-David are interesting.

The video was recorded on Monday May 22nd, two days before Ron DeSantis officially launched his campaign (May 24).  The meeting being described by Bet-David is on Thursday May 18, approximately four days before the interview, and six days before the campaign launch.

PBD notes he was invited with 10 to 15 other people to “watch Governor Ron DeSantis, work” in the governor’s mansion.  In essence, it seems like someone from the DeSantis campaign was continuing to reach out to ‘influencers’ in advance of the announcement the following week.

QUESTION:  Why do none of these influencers ask why they are being invited to “watch” DeSantis?  It just seems odd.   The podcast segment is a pretty good discussion with Sebastian Gorka, but watch the first 20 seconds.



What PBD outlines rather casually is exactly what I drew attention to last year.  The DeSantis operation was clearly working in the latter part of 2021 to seed the landscape for the 2024 election, including the January 6, 2022, influencer meetup.  Yet for some odd reason, none of the participants questioned what the purpose of the unsolicited engagement request was.

I first wrote about this last July and August, it’s all just weird.

If you have followed the management and branding efforts of the team around Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, the protestations today by campaign official and registered foreign agent Christina Pushaw are quite bizarre.

In early January of 2023, the Daily Beast wrote an article [SEE HERE] about how Ms. Pushaw organized an astroturf campaign of support for Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, which included the recruitment of several conservative influencers.  The substance of the article is generally well known.

In late 2021, early 2022, Ms. Pushaw invited a group of “influencers” to spend time with Governor DeSantis.

It’s not a debatable event. Factually, the collective group took gleeful pictures of their first visit on January 6, 2022, and continued to post frequent pictures on their social media of events throughout last year.  The group went to the reelection celebration and inauguration of DeSantis in January before the Daily Beast article.

However, for some odd reason, likely more concerned about people realizing the ‘organized‘ nature of the creation, in a bizarre turn of events, Ms. Christina Pushaw was denying she ever organized the assembly.  Then she stated, without any documentary evidence proving she organized it, saying she organized it was a conspiracy theory. [Tweet Link]

If Ms. Pushaw is to be believed, the random group of Florida conservative “influencers” just happened to show up at the Governor’s office on January 6, 2022, without any invitation, organization or coordination on her part.

Even lacking the invitation details, hanging your defense on the absence of a paper trail under these circumstances seems like a very odd position to take.

Why does the DeSantis team fear sunlight on the origin of how this outreach and subsequent meetings took place?  Very odd.

I sincerely doubt this group just randomly showed up at Ron DeSantis’ office, on January 6, 2022, without an invitation or organizing.

The same group then continued meeting throughout the year….

.

Nothing about their recruitment, continued meet-ups and aggressive promotion of Ron DeSantis for the GOP nomination in 2024, would be that interesting or even noteworthy if Ms. Christina Pushaw didn’t paint them all into a box by denying she ever organized their first assembly.

And there’s the rub…  Why was Christina Pushaw denying she first organized them on behalf of the political aspirations of her boss, Ron DeSantis?

The only logical reason to make such an outlandish and transparently false claim, was if original 2022 assembly was intended as seed material to use the “influencers” for another purpose, like a 2024 presidential bid.  This truth would cut through the pretense of the “book tour”, national branding launch and subsequent nonsense.

However, with Ron DeSantis announcing his candidacy for the GOP nomination, suddenly all these background moves look like proactive steps on behalf of the management team.  The January 6, 2022 meeting would then infer the presidential aspirations went as far back as December 2021.

In combination with the $200+ million in Wall Street money assembled by DeSantis, it certainly appears that hiding the long-constructed 2024 plan was the motive for the absurd denial.  To give you an idea of how Florida voters feel about this campaign fraud, watch this twitter video:

That Trump-supporting DeSantis organizer is exactly how the majority of Florida grassroot activists feel.   He’s 100% spot on.



Former First Lady Rosalynn Carter Has Dementia

 

Rosalynn Carter, the wife of former President Jimmy Carter and a longtime advocate for expanded access to mental health care, has dementia, the Carter Center said on Tuesday.

The announcement came just over three months after the center said that Mr. Carter, who at 98 is the longest living president in American history, had decided to forgo further medical treatment and would enter hospice care at the couple’s home in Plains, Ga.

The center said on Tuesday that Mrs. Carter, 95, “continues to live happily at home with her husband, enjoying spring in Plains and visits with loved ones.”

“We recognize, as she did more than half a century ago, that stigma is often a barrier that keeps individuals and their families from seeking and getting much-needed support,” the center said. “We hope sharing our family’s news will increase important conversations at kitchen tables and in doctor’s offices around the country.”  


The Carter Center said that one in 10 older Americans have dementia, which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defines as a general term for an impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with everyday activities. Alzheimer’s disease is the most common type of dementia.

“As the founder of the Rosalynn Carter Institute for Caregivers, Mrs. Carter often noted that there are only four kinds of people in this world: those who have been caregivers; those who are currently caregivers, those who will be caregivers, and those who will need caregivers,” the center said. “The universality of caregiving is clear in our family, and we are experiencing the joy and the challenges of this journey. We do not expect to comment further and ask for understanding for our family and for everyone across the country serving in a caregiver role.”  


https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/30/us/rosalynn-carter-dementia.html    





Mike Huckabee Has Some Advice for Ron DeSantis and I'm Wondering Why

Mike Huckabee Has Some Advice for Ron DeSantis and I'm Wondering Why

Duke reporting for RedState 

I’m going to file this story under the ever-so-happy category of “I didn’t know this person was still Kicking It Old School and giving their opinion on stuff.” I’m always thrilled to be reminded of things that I had forgotten, particularly subjects that remind me of week-old melted vanilla ice cream that you just kind of walk around to avoid on the sidewalk.

So welcome back to the political fold of commentating, former Arkansas Governor Mick Huckabee. Were you on vacation or did Fox News get rid of you also? Hopefully, they didn’t ax you as they did Tucker and I hope you and the wife were on a great retreat with the My Pillow guy most likely.

Yet I have one question for the guy who followed Bill Clinton into the Governorship in the Toothpick State: Why are you grumpy with the current Governor of the State of Florida?

According to our compadres over at Townhall, Huckabee came out wagging his finger after Ron DeSantis announced his run for the GOP nomination for President last week. From the article Republican Criticizes DeSantis: ‘You Promised Four Years’ to Floridians.

Former Arkansas GOP Gov. Mike Huckabee fired shots at Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla) after launching his 2024 presidential campaign.

Huckabee criticized DeSantis’s decision to run for president after he just ran for governor last year, saying he promised Floridians four years.

“One of the challenges that he’s going to have to answer is a very obvious question: If you want to be president, how come you ran for governor just last year?” Huckabee told Newsmax. “You asked for a four-year job, and then you barely had gotten into it before you were looking for another four-year job.”

The Arkansas Republican aimed his response to DeSantis’s announcement, telling him he better be prepared to defend his decision.

Thankfully, I came across this article and the Huckabee quote which, after reading it, allowed my eyes to naturally roll back into my head to examine any damage from the actual quote.

Thankfully there was none.

Now, you may be wondering why am I picking on the former hapless Governor and the father of the current Governor of Arkansas and it is a fair question.

You see, Mike Huckabee ran for the GOP nomination for president in 2008 and in 2016.

In all fairness, I actually forgot that he ran in 2008 but it has become quite obvious in this article that I’m not a mega fan of Mike Huckabee. I’m sure he’s a nice bloke and all but I never found his style and the way he explained his policy positions interesting.

When I looked back in history at the crowded field in 2016 that Donald Trump eventually outlasted to win that cycle, there were a number of elected officials in that pack. Those that come to mind were Ted Cruz and Rand Paul and I looked in vain to find if Huckabee had asked that same question of the two senators.

I could not find that he did.

Now, maybe I’m just not as good searching on the Google Wayback machine but my hunch is that that wasn’t a concern of candidate Huckabee running for president back in the 2016 contest.

However, I did find that Mike Huckabee has already announced his support for former President Trump back in March of this year. Here is the video.



So, of course, Mike Huckabee’s concern about Ron DeSantis finishing out his term as Florida governor is superficial at best. What he is really concerned about is that Ron DeSantis could beat Donald Trump for the nomination and all the horrible things that could happen with that possibility.

(My tongue is firmly in my cheek with that last sentence.)

If Huckabee was not concerned about the voters of Texas and Kentucky in 2016 being short-changed he’s not concerned about the people of Florida being short-changed either. This is just the simpleton type of politics that the politicians have gotten used to dishing and the people have accepted being served.

So, while I have no firm commitment to any candidate yet in the GOP primaries to come I am fully in favor of the American people having as many qualified people as possible to choose from. One of the most nonsensical things that I’ve heard people say so far in this cycle is that in a nation of 330 million people, there are only one or two candidates of each party that should be favored to run. That type of thinking is backward and that narrative being pushed is one of the reasons why this country is in the mess that it is in today.

I hope that Mike Huckabee realizes this and I’m also grateful he is still around sharing his political wisdom for us to consider.

Most of the time