Monday, April 17, 2023

Biden Youth Goose Stepping to Trans Ideology

The Delaware Democrat is possessed by trans ideology, a defiance of reality unprecedented in human history, with deadly consequences.


“Transgender Day of Visibility celebrates the joy, strength, and absolute courage of some of the bravest people I know—people who have too often had to put their jobs, relationships, and lives on the line just to be their true selves.”

That was Joe Biden on March 30, three days after transgender Audrey Hale shot dead Evelyn Dieckhaus, 9, Mike Hill, 61, William Kinney, 9, Katherine Koonce, 60, Cynthia Peak, 61, and Hallie Scruggs, also 9 and the daughter of Chad Scruggs, senior pastor at the Covenant Presbyterian Church.

Haley Scruggs and Cynthia Peak had funerals that day, but Biden named not a single victim and failed to name or condemn the murderer.

In an April 6 statement, Biden says three students and three school officials were gunned down in “yet another tragic mass shooting.” But as on March 30, the Delaware Democrat failed to name the victims, identify the shooter, and condemn the shooter. Hale’s possible motive also escapes notice.

Victim Mike Hill was black, but no speculation that the white Audrey Hale could have been motivated by racism. Her targets were all Christians, but not a word about the possibility of a hate crime. Biden also failed to mention Michael Collazo and Rex Engelbert, the brave police officers who took down Hale before she could murder more children. The following week in Colorado, a man who thinks he’s a woman planned a series of similar attacks.

William Whitworth, 19, who calls himself “Lilly,” planned attacks on three schools in Colorado Springs. Whitworth had compiled a manifesto with drawings of classrooms, lists of firearms, and names of individuals to be killed.

If these developments leave observers confused, they might seek clarification from Bruce Bawer, author of A Place at the TableThe Gay Individual in American Society

“Years ago, gay magazines and organizations routinely conveyed the message that, as a gay man, I was part of something called ‘the gay community,’” Bawer writes. “Then at some point when I wasn’t looking, I was adopted into something called ‘the LGBTQ+ family.’” This happened even though “homosexuality and transgenderism are two utterly different phenomena.” And what now passes for transgenderism isn’t just gender dysphoria.

“We’re dealing with a transgender ideology,” Bawer explains, “according to which a man who thinks he’s a woman isn’t suffering from a mental disorder: he actually is a woman, and always has been; and a woman who thinks she’s a man really is a man, and always has been.”

Gay rights was “reformist,” Bawer argues, but the trans movement is “revolutionary in a way humankind has never experienced before. Because it’s not a revolution against any particular government or political system. It’s a revolution against reality itself.” That is indeed the case, but there’s more to it.

As Spanish artist Francisco José de Goya y Lucientes observed, “El sueño de la razon produce monstruos.” The sleep of reason produces monsters. Hippolyte Taine, historian of the French Revolution, has a different take.

“Nothing is more dangerous than a general idea in narrow and empty minds,” Taine wrote, “as they are empty, it finds no knowledge there to interfere with it; as they are narrow it is not long before it occupies the place entirely. Henceforth they no longer belong to themselves but are mastered by it; it works in them and through them, the man, in the true sense of the word, being possessed.”

The trans types, with their reason fast asleep, are possessed with the idea that thinking something makes it so. That fails to square with science, reason, and the Judeo-Christian concept of God creating people male and female. People of this time-honored belief are held to be attacking the trans types.

As the April 1 “Trans Day of Vengeance” poster proclaimed, the Christians are pronounced guilty of “genocide.” That sets up a justification for attacking them, regardless of age. As potential victims might note, Audrey Hale planned the attack for months, and gunned down 9-year-old Hallie Scruggs, a pastor’s daughter.

Joe Biden wouldn’t say her name or condemn her killer. Three days after the mass murder, the Delaware Democrat said his administration would address “anti-transgender violence,” and end “the crisis of violence against transgender Americans.” For an inversion of reality, that’s hard to top. On the other hand, it is revealing.

Joe Biden is now possessed by the trans ideology. The militant trans types serve as Biden Jugend, a fake oppressed minority at war with reality and perpetually enraged.

Should conditions revert to the summer of 2020, with Black Lives Matter and Antifa rioting, arson, and murder in cities across the nation, squads of Audrey Hales could form a transaatzgruppen targeting churches and schools. Based on experience to date, the virulently anti-Christian Biden Junta would look the other way.

Meanwhile, for actual cases of genocide see the experience of the Armenians under the Ottoman Turks, the Jews under German National Socialism, and Cambodians under the Khmer Rouge, who murdered between 1.5 million and 3 million people, nearly a quarter of the population.

Cambodian children were clubbed to death and babies smashed against trees. See Murder of a Gentle Land: The Untold Story of Communist Genocide in Cambodia, by John Barron and Anthony Paul. As ever, the struggle against genocide is the struggle of memory against forgetting.



X22, Christian Patriot News, and more- April 17

 



You know, it's a damn good thing I heard about Linda signing her name on those scripts for the last 2 episodes a few weeks ago. Because anxiety and frustration is all I've been feeling today!! 😡

1st, TV Line releases 3 blurry looking close up photos from the finale wedding, and Hetty's backside isn't even shown in either of the photos, then oh you know, that full circle episode I was hyping up recently because of how important it is? Here's it's press release:

“The Reckoning” – When four people, including a CIA officer, are shot and killed in broad daylight, the NCIS team suspects the attacks have something to do with DRONA. Also, Pembrook meets with Callen and gives more insight into his past, on the CBS Original series NCIS: LOS ANGELES, Sunday, May 7 (10:00-11:00 PM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network, and available to stream live and on demand on Paramount+*.

Doesn't this sound a bit anti-climatic to anyone? (then again, the writer of this episode is known for his overdramatic and at times quite bloody writing, so who knows what the end result will be!!).

And to top it all off, I just found out that on May 1st, every major TV and Movie writer in Hollywood will be going on strike if there's no deal made with the WGA! That'll effectively delay the upcoming TV show Season (including the few broadcast shows I still stick with), and could negatively impact my future TV rom coms on GAF and UP TV!

Yeah, I'm kind of anxious and frustrated right now!!!

Can We Do Anything About America’s Decline? ~ VDH

The remedies are agreed upon, but the needed medicine is feared more than the disease. Because today, the government is the cause of our many crises.


Twenty-first-century America was on a trajectory of gradual decline—until it began to implode.

Was the accelerant the COVID-19 pandemic and unhinged lockdowns? Or was the catalyst the woke revolution fueled by the 2020 summer of exempted rioting, looting, arson, and violence? Or was it perhaps the deranged fixation on removing Donald Trump from the presidency and destroying the rule of law in the process? Or all that and more? 

Now with the election of Joe Biden, what had been a fast-tracked decline has accelerated at such an astonishing rate we can scarcely recognize our country.

Our largest cities are becoming uninhabitable—dilapidated, dangerous, and dysfunctional. The challenge is not just rampant crime, but the realization that if you, the citizen, are stabbed, shot, or beaten up on the street, the perpetrators may well be exempt from most punishments. And the victim either will be forgotten in his misery or, indeed, blamed for bringing such violence upon himself.

Urban schools are not places of instruction anymore. That fact is accepted by teachers’ unions, whose operative principle seems to be that the more hopeless the idea of educating urban youth is understood to be, the less burdensome the workload, and the greater their hazardous duty pay.

Urban chain stores are closing down on the principle that if police cannot or will not stop consumer violence and theft, then consumers there should not have any store to buy anything, anyway. If there is no store, how can it be looted or shop-lifted?

The only mystery remaining is how long these Democrat-controlled, racially charged, and corrupt municipalities can sustain their budgets and pension commitments with increasingly declining revenue. One can tax the well off, and perhaps even gouge them as California does. But one cannot insult and ridicule them in the process. Being highly taxed is one thing, being highly taxed while hated is quite another.

How eerie that medievalism—defecting, urinating, fornicating, injecting in the street—is relabeled “homelessness—as if the problem is merely a shortage of apartments or tent cities. Somehow cities developed the notion that it was crueler to be told not to pull down one’s pants and defecate in the street than it was for a pedestrian to step into infectious human excrement.

In the next five years, either cities will seek new governance to reduce taxes, break up municipal unions, mandate charter schools, restore police funding and manpower, recalibrate pensions, and prosecute criminals and corrupt officials—or Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Portland, Minneapolis, and a score of others will become Detroit.

One of the strangest phenomena amid our current debility are the millions of affluent leftists and liberals who have fled their unworkable, now unlivable blue-run, but naturally beautiful cities like San Francisco or Portland. They seem to lack an abstract recognition why they are leaving, or why and how their new chosen destinations are so different and therefore so inviting to them. Is their motto, “I am fleeing what I created, but I still hate those who created what I want”?

To have a “border problem,” one must have a border. The United States has no southern border.

Upwards of 7 million illegal entries since the Biden inauguration are proof enough of that tragedy. Mexico brags that 40 million have come into the United States. It urges them to vote Democratic. And it relies on still more illegal entries to ensure yearly increases in its current $60 billion in remittance income sent from its expatriates in the United States. The donors apparently grow fonder of Mexico—the more they are safely distant from it.

America could close the border tomorrow and actually “make Mexico pay for the wall” by simply slapping a 10 percent export tax on all remittances sent to Mexico. Or we could make it illegal to send money out of the country if one is receiving federal subsidies and aid. Or we could fine employers for hiring those who are here illegally. Or, as a deterrent to future illegal entries, we could immediately deport all who illegally entered and reside in the United States—if they came within the last five years, or if they have a criminal record, or if they are not working and are on public assistance.

The result would not just be a restoration of American sovereignty, and decline in spiraling social service costs. There would follow better relations with Latin America and Mexico. Both treat us with contempt as a hectoring weakling because, unlike themselves, we do not believe in our own physical space, our own borders, and our freedom to do as we please rather than what others tell us to do.

Abroad, our allies and neutrals are distancing themselves from America—France, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, India, Turkey, South Korea—on the Ukraine War, China, the dollar as the global currency, and our popular culture.

Why? Our increasingly former friends conclude it is now dangerous to ally openly with the United States and for a variety of reasons:

1) They see the once indomitable United States as weak—as a possible liability rather than an asset. After China’s balloon surveillances, the Afghanistan flight, the inability to achieve strategic victory after intervening in Iraq and Libya, the current embarrassing Pentagon leak, the Anchorage mini-summit, the woke obsessions in the U.S. military, and the inability to ensure its military is well-staffed, apolitical, and equipped with the world’s most plentiful and cutting-edge weaponry, allies assume that the United States will not necessarily win any intervention it undertakes but may well drag them down with it.

2) The United States may suddenly turn on an ally, demonize it, and refuse to meet with its leaders, as Biden gratuitously maligned Saudi Arabia and Israel.

3) America asks allies to join its cause of the day regardless of whether it is in those nations’ own interest. So South Korea, Japan, India, or Egypt do not believe boycotting Russian oil or openly selling Ukraine weapons is necessarily in their interests. 

4) Our woke revolution is so volatile, irrational, and unpredictable that allies never know when they will be accused of being homophobic, transphobic, racist, or sexist and treated accordingly—or whether the United States will be eternally crippled by internal woke dissension and civil unrest.

5) The allies do not believe the United States can keep secrets, especially after the latest leak. From the Dobbs draft leak and the Comey leak of a confidential conversation with President Trump to the Vindman-Ciaramella-Schiff impeachment psychodrama leaks to Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden, leakers and “whistleblowers” feel there are few consequences to leaking classified information (unless it is embarrassing to leftist administrations), or indeed leaking to the media to overturn institutions and presidencies.

America must reform the entire Pentagon process of spending and appropriations. It must end woke and identity politics, ideological indoctrination, and return to a meritocracy. It should prohibit retiring generals and admirals from revolving into defense contractor boards and lobbyists. It should finally enforce the Uniform Code of Military Justice that prohibits active and retired high-ranking officers from publicly attacking their current commander-in-chief. It should charge leakers with felonies and prosecute perjury. Had the government done that with Andrew McCabe, John Brennan, James Comey, and James Clapper the accruing deterrence would have discouraged others with lower profiles. 

Biden is on schedule to run up a $2 trillion annual deficit, adhering to the Bush, Obama, and Trump legacy of unfettered spending. In Biden’s case, he insanely printed over $4 trillion at a time when labor participation rates were already in decline, COVID-suppressed demand was returning, and transportation and production interruptions were reducing supply. He raised taxes, increased regulations, cut projected increases in gas and oil production, and canceled energy projects. The result was the highest inflation in 40 years, near-record energy costs, soaring interest rates, the largest modern percentage of debt to GDP at 130 percent, the greatest debt in our history at $33 trillion, and stagnant GDP. All that and more prompt the current Chinese-led effort to dethrone the dollar as the world’s currency. 

The remedies are agreed upon, but the needed medicine is feared more than the disease. Our elected leaders know we must, but never even attempt to, cut spending, reduce the size of the federal government radically, simplify the tax code and reduce taxes, deregulate, recalibrate Medicare and Social Security, develop our mineral, gas, and oil resources, and require labor participation for able-bodied entitlement recipients.

Never have Americans spent more on K-12 and higher education and never have they received less in return. The education industry is woke and nonmeritocratic. Research is diverted, sidetracked, and polluted by ideological commissars, endangering the U.S. lead in science, math, engineering, and the professions. Even scientists have become deductive, starting out with a preconceived woke conclusion they feel will win influence, grants, and notoriety and then scrambling to warp evidence to fit it.

The solutions are straightforward. Tax university endowment income—and lots of superfluous and harmful programs will vanish. 

Stop federal student loan guarantees, and soaring tuition and room-and-board costs will decline to the annual rate of inflation once universities must guarantee their own student loans. 

Require universities that receive federal funds of any sort to honor existing laws from the Bill of Rights to the 1964 Civil Rights Act. That would end segregated dorms and graduations. The next time administrators at Stanford or San Francisco State either aid or ignore student efforts to shout down or disrupt speakers and suppress free expression, their institutions should quickly be fined by the U.S. government or have their federal funding yanked.

If SAT and ACT entrance tests are being abolished, then they could be rebooted as exit tests required for a bachelor’s degree analogous to a bar exam. With such minimum standards, we might ascertain what, if anything, students had learned upon graduation. College graduates should be able to choose between an academic master’s degree or the school of education credential to teach K-12. Most would flee the latter option. Right-to-teach laws and the end to mandatory teacher union dues, along with the end of tenure and its replacement by five-year contracts with required minimum standards of achievement, would all bring some accountability to what is now an entirely unaccountable profession.

Race is no longer an accurate barometer of either victimhood or legitimate grievance. If “affirmative” action were to continue, it should be based entirely on class considerations, not the current system of Elizabeth Warrenesque fakery or delusions that the elite children of Eric Holder, the Obamas, the Duchess of Sussex, or LeBron James are in some need of compensatory privilege for college admissions, appointments, or hiring.

Because America is now multiracial, with untold ethnic and racial agendas, and countless and contorted collective grievances, it is impossible to sort out victimizers and victims. Junk the entire illiberal and patently illegal system of racial discrimination, and there would be an organic return to merit, and with it, race would become incidental, not essential to American identities. After 1964, it seems Orwellian that liberal institutions could continue to assign dorms by race, segregate graduations, and impose racial requisites to participate in special programs.

America’s former strength—the most transparent, accurate, and trustworthy elections in the world—have descended into its greatest liability. In the space of a mere eight years, and especially in reaction to radical political changes made under the cover of the COVID lockdown, we have gone from 70 percent of the electorate in most states voting on election day to a mere 30 percent. Yet the ballot rejection rate somehow diminished, with the flood of non-Election-Day ballots that overwhelmed accustomed audit and verification.

Election night is a mere construct. It is mostly meaningless. Local, state, and federal election results are stalled and descend into days, weeks, and sometimes even months of bickering, counter charges of ballot tampering and fraud, ballot harvesting and curing, and a loss of confidence in the integrity of the final result. Debates mean little anymore, once a large portion of the electorate has already voted. No wonder deceased candidates can win. Gaffes are now determined by whether they occur before or after the majority of voters has cast their ballots. 

There should be a national uniform standard that allows states to set their ballot procedures—as long as they result in 70 percent of the electorate voting in person on election day. 

America is in a similar position to where it was in 1861, 1929, 1941, and 1968—only perhaps worse, given in all those cases, there was at least a president and Congress that identified and reacted to the crisis, whereas today our elected government is what caused the crisis.



‘Woke Alerts’ Notifies Consumers When Companies Go Woke



A new and free notification system known as “Woke Alerts” informs consumers when a company promotes the radical, left-wing agenda, compromising the values of traditional American consumers.

Woke Alerts subscribers will receive text messages whenever a company “cave[s] to the woke agenda,” wrote Consumers’ Research, the nonprofit that created Woke Alerts. Also available to subscribers are detailed reports revealing “what’s really behind those decisions, including in some cases, the desire to mask their own objectionable behavior.”

“Many corporations are putting progressive activists and their dangerous agendas ahead of customers,” stated Consumers’ Research. “They’ll only succeed if we look the other way.”

Woke Alerts is part of the nonprofit’s broader “Consumers First Initiative,” which launched in May 2021 and is committed to “putting corporations on notice – It’s time to start serving your customers and stop serving woke politicians.” So far, the Consumers First Initiative has done thorough reports on companies like BlackRockCoca-ColaNikeAmerican AirlinesState FarmTicketmasterMLBAmerican Express, and Levi’s.

Earlier this month, beer brand Anheuser-Busch collaborated on a video with transgender-identifying TikTokker Dylan Mulvaney to honor the completion of his first year as a supposed “girl.” Anheuser-Busch consumers responded by boycotting the beer brand, and the company’s market cap dropped nearly $4 billion

However, a report from The New York Post indicates that despite the revenue loss in the immediate aftermath of the video collaboration, Anheuser-Busch’s Mulvaney publicity stunt was likely a net gain because the company acquired something significant from it: social credit.

Indeed, organizations like the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) use a point system to measure companies’ “corporate social responsibility,” pushing them to produce “marketing or advertising to LGBTQ consumers.”

[Read: “There’s Only One Way To Stop The Dylan Mulvaney-fication Of Everything And Complaining On The Internet Isn’t It”]

According to the Post, HRC “doesn’t just sit back passively either. HRC sends representatives to corporations every year telling them what kind of stuff they have to make visible at the company. They give them a list of demands and if they don’t follow through there’s a threat that you won’t keep your [Corporate Equality Index] score.” The Corporate Equality Index, which is overseen by the HRC, is a mega-powerful LGBTQ+ political lobbying group.

Unfortunately, regular consumers don’t have that kind of power. Since there isn’t a “non-radical leftist, basic decency” social credit score for companies, normal American consumers can only stage individual boycotts. However, this method is often ineffective at impacting company decisions because it’s disorganized and lacks long-term follow-through. But most importantly, consumers don’t always know when the brands and services they are buying have gone woke. 

That is what Woke Alerts wants to change. “We believe companies should focus on their customers and not woke politicians and progressive activists,” stated Consumers’ Research Executive Director Will Hild. “Nor should they be compelled to act in a certain way based on pressure from ESG extremists.”

Woke Alerts presents an avenue for consumers to take back commercial agency and power by keeping them informed. Conservatives don’t need to spend their hard-earned dollars on companies that hate them and their values.



Inside the '24 GOP Struggle as Trump, DeSantis, Haley, and TBDs Assemble Early



The Republican National Convention to nominate a presidential candidate is 65 long weeks away – 10,944 hours, to be precise.

So, it is ludicrously premature to make any judgments or conclusions about the crucial outcome in Milwaukee that will shape America’s history for years to come, for better or worse.

This is especially true because the divisiveness, anger, fears, and decaying mental condition of the current White House incumbent have combined to create an unusually uncertain political, economic, and mental climate for the rest of us to try ignoring in our daily lives.

And the juvenile gamesmanship and geriatric leadership of our two short-sighted political parties in Congress offer no comfort whatsoever.

However, we can detect some certainties already emerging.

First, Donald Trump is not going away. He is the elephant lurching around the nation’s living room trying to become only the second president in historyto lose reelection and win the next one.

Trump’s skilled but often inchoate showmanship and unpredictable behavior make him a media magnet, which he covets almost as much as the media that loves to hate him for the busine$$ he generates.

Trump sucks up so much of the media oxygen that competitors in his adopted party have — and will continue to have — trouble breathing life into their candidacies. Plus, he now has the experience and aura of the presidency, which none of them have.

Watch for the media to turn everything into a horserace with someone always falling back or gaining strength, anything to look new and attract readers when nothing really has changed. They’re already reporting DeSantis sliding, when he’s still weeks from launching.

Millions of Americans, not just Republicans, retain a genuine appreciation for the many policy achievements of Trump’s years in office. And that’s not just our now deceased energy independence, our now threatened income tax cuts, the absence of crippling inflation and new foreign military adventures, and the caution that his diplomatic unpredictability forced down the throats of adversaries such as Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, and Kim Jung-Un.

Trump will be 78 next year, the same age as Joe Biden when he became the oldest president ever in 2021.

But the often obstreperous and generous billionaire has never displayed any of the physical and mental infirmities and confusions of Biden, the shuffling old-man gait that reveals a fear of falling, the inability to read a jumbo teleprompter coherently, and the confusing rhetorical ad-libs that go nowhere but Silly City.

In fact, in the closing campaign days of 2020, while Biden cowered in his Delaware basement, Trump was doing three major rallies a day in as many states.

Americans want to see candidates who really want the Oval Office job. They also want candidates to talk about the future, not past disappointments or grievances. Yes, fishy things did occur in the 2020 results, though nothing on a scale that would change the outcome.

Trump needs to move on, as most voters have.

Likewise, Biden, the career legislator, needs to accept that Americans will never sincerely appreciate his legislative legerdemain that spent in excess of $5 trillion in newly-printed money to ignite the lingering inflation that’s taxing everyone still, inflation that he promised would not happen.

Reader Advisory: Biden also has assured everyone that a major recession is not looming, as he assured all that inflation was a mere blip.

It may well not be true, but he wants it that way. A recession would create a disaster for this president, especially if the GOP picks a vibrant, disciplined nominee who can articulate specific solutions.

Biden revealed last week he has yet again postponed his campaign announcement, possibly into the fall. It could go even later. This is one of those vows that the more it’s repeated, the less credible it seems.

Very little of what Biden says is true. I have a sneaking suspicion in the end he won’t run. But holding off as long as possible has several advantages for him. It avoids the lame duck label longer while keeping Democrat challengers off the field.

It delays the impact of federal fundraising restrictions. It allows him to play commander in chief longer, seemingly unsullied by suspicions that everything he says and does is a campaign tactic, which it is. But play along, folks. He’s old.

It saves Biden’s reduced physical strength that already requires short weeks and abbreviated workdays punctuated by weekly vacations in Delaware doing no one knows what. And it reduces the time he can commit countless campaign gaffes, while allowing sympathetic media to focus full-time on GOP infighting.

It also allows not him, but aides actually aware of what’s going on, to study the field longer. Who knows, another Trump indictment could come along, though recent polling indicates the fake targeting one in Manhattan actually boosted Trump’s support. It certainly prompted a multi-million-dollar donation wave.

Biden’s campaign is praying the GOP field becomes huge, fragmenting the anti-Trump vote and greasing the way for another Trump nomination, as it did in 2016’s 17-candidate field.

So far, the GOP field includes Trump, 76; Nikki Haley, 51; Vivek Ramaswamy, 37; and Asa Hutchinson, 72, who without much organization had to announce his campaign launch on a Sunday talk show without a swarm of cheering supporters and media. Mike Pompeo and Larry Hogan have opted out.

But Tim Scott, 57, looks likely to enter. Other serious possibilities include Mike Pence, 63; Chris Sununu, 48; Glenn Youngkin, 56; and, of course, Ron DeSantis, 44.

I say, of course, because the Florida governor, who won overwhelming reelection in November, has built a strong reputation for numerous conservative achievements including some significant anti-woke battles and turning the one-time swing state into a solid red one.

Though he’s unlikely to announce before the end of his legislative session next month, the House and Navy veteran is quietly making the necessary arrangements for the colossal undertaking of a presidential campaign. He was in New Hampshire this weekend.

As of now, DeSantis’ entry would make the GOP primary contest essentially a two-man race with the former allies running on the far side of the track and the others still by the starting line deep in single-digit support.

But remember I said above that “now” is ridiculously early.

DeSantis trails his fellow Floridian by double digits, and the governor is largely untested on the national stage. Can he hold up under the intense spotlight and vetting of a hostile national media that would prefer Trump’s raucous style?

DeSantis’ supporters describe him as Trump without the drama. But at the first GOP debate on Fox come August in Milwaukee, how would DeSantis answer serious questions beyond Florida issues: The war in Ukraine, trade policies toward China, sanctions on Iraq, abortion, immigration, electric cars, and the Southern border?

As well as the evergreen gotchas like the current price of milk and eggs and the names of foreign leaders that tripped up Hillary Clinton and George W. Bush.

Primary campaigns are intentionally rigorous mentally and physically. A senile Joe Biden can get away with gaffes like calling a town hall questioner a derogatory term or confusing the names of two flyover states. Iowa, Ohio, both four letters. What’s the difference?

Remember in 2008, Hillary Clinton was caught planting written questions with audience members so she could extol the crowd with her rehearsed talking points. And Barack Obama boasted in Oregon that he’d visited all 57 states with one more to go.

But they’re Democrats. So, it’s OK.

Let a Republican like Gov. Rick Perry on-stage forget the name of one federal department, and he’s dead-candidate walking.

Our schools downplay the study of history. But what’s already happened in our national life is also key to understanding contemporary politics, even in an age of unpredictability.

In the 2015-16 cycle, the Pew Research Center found great fluidity in candidate support. Virtually every Republican voter changed their mind at least once during the primaries, some more than that.

At various stages, polling found Jeb Bush, Rick Perry, and Dr. Ben Carson in front.

At this equally early point in 2015, Sen. Ted Cruz was atop a Republican primary field of 15 with Gov. Scott Walker right behind. The next highest was No Opinion at 13 percent.

A New York businessman named Trump wasn’t even on the early list. He was still two months out from announcing.




How William and Mary College Converted Skylar Culbertson from Liberal to Staunch Conservative

How William and Mary College Converted Skylar Culbertson from Liberal to Staunch Conservative

by Jennifer Oliver O'Connell for RedState 
The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of this site.

Ed Morrisey at our sister site Hot Air did a great podcast interview with Skylar Culbertson, a student at William and Mary College who has been harassed and attacked for her pro-life stance on the campus, and for debunking the gender ideology nonsense by stating publicly that there are only two genders.

Morrisey said of his conversation with Skylar:

Skylar joined me on The Ed Morrissey Show podcast to discuss the issue and the lack of response from William and Mary’s administration, plus much more. After all, as Skylar points out, the violence in response to pro-life and conservative speech isn’t limited to her campus alone.

“We saw what happened at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond,” Skylar says. “Kristen [Hawkins] was harassed. And then again with Riley Gaines in San Francisco, so yeah, it’s happening all across the country. And it’s crazy that people feel that they need to resort to violence to get across their social goals.”

That’s not to say that the response is any better when guest speakers are not involved. “Last semester, my club did a tabling event and we actually had one student throw a cup of urine on my club members,” Skylar continues. “So thankfully, after the Virginia Attorney General got involved, that student was arrested,” but most of the threats and violence don’t get any response from the school itself.

Skylar wrote about this in detail for the publication The College Fix. This website is a featured publication of Conk! News out of Minnesota, where I am a regular contributor to their podcasts. So, I reached out to The College Fix editor Jennifer Kabbany to get her perspective on Skylar’s experience and discover whether the reporting on these incidents is based on the actual frequency of events, or whether it is an echo chamber that tends to happen with certain subject matters in all media circles.

In an email interview, Kabbany affirmed that this is a real issue on college campuses, and Skylar’s story is all too common.

“It is not hyperbole,” Kabbany said. “The College Fix has published more than 100 stories over the years of conservative students being threatened, attacked, harassed, doxed, defamed and slandered. Their events are targeted, their requests for funding denied, their speakers shouted down.”

The term “brave” has all but lost its meaning because we throw it around cavalierly from the singer Lizzo baring her ample backside, to fauxnalist Taylor Lorenz crying on camera over her own self-inflicted wounds. Skylar taking the stance she has over the past year is truly brave. The escalated attacks on conservatives in the college space, like the attack on Riley Gaines by a trans activist at San Francisco State University, have had a chilling effect on conservative speech. These threats and attacks also require enhanced security, and school administrators and campus police have refused to step up to protect the rights of conservatives to freely air their viewpoints without retaliation. Kabbany confirmed this as well.

“Survey after survey shows a majority of conservative students are afraid to even voice their opinions in the classroom or on the quad for fear of their peers’ and professors’ virulent reactions.”

I had the opportunity to interview Skylar on Friday (video below), and despite the vitriol being directed her way, she refuses to back down and continues to be vocal.

“Students are resorting to violence and willing to go to extreme measures is really what we’re seeing,” she told Morrisey. “My DMs are always full with people saying the most insane things to me.”

“We should be able to have simple conversations, we should be able to talk like normal people.”

I was fascinated by the fact that aside from Skylar’s Christianity and her pro-life leanings, she started out pretty middle-of-the-road liberal when she transferred to William and Mary College. In our interview, I discovered that it was not just the forced indoctrination of transgender ideology that spurred her to activism, but the pro-abortion furor over the Dobbs draft leak last May.

“I transferred in as a junior to William and Mary, and I noticed that the pro-abortion Club called “Vox” on campus was very active and there was no pro-life presence whatsoever,” she said.

“At the time, I was just personally pro-life. I was never outspoken about my beliefs at all, but I just hated that, you know, women were being told that abortion is the only option and that they need abortion to be successful, because that’s just not the case at all.”

The lopsided perspective of the Left—theirs is the only true way.

“So, I I really prayed about it. I’m a Christian, and I was like, you know what God, is this what you want me to do youDo you want me to take over the club? So, I started with [the pro-life club] Tribe for Life, and really the rest is history from there. But yes, Whenever the Supreme Court decision leaked, that was my first time being very outspoken about my beliefs. The pro-abortion club Vox was having a protest here in colonial Williamsburg, and I went alone because nobody wanted to join me. And that was like, I feel like once you put yourself out there for one time, that kind of just changes everything.”

Skylar said she had tourists visiting colonial Williamsburg who actually joined her to protest!

“That was really the first time that I had experienced God really, and felt that he spoke to me that day. Ever since then, I’ve been outspokenly for life.”

Skylar will be graduating next month, but she spoke about how her courageous stance has affected change and encouraged incoming conservative students to be bold in their speech and brave in their activism. Skylar also kept the pressure on the school administration at William and Mary to do their due diligence to uphold the rights of her and her club’s speech and take strides to protect it, as their code of conduct and charter states. This pressure is necessary in order to see change happen on the college landscape, as The College Fix editor Jennifer Kabbany affirms.

“It is up to students, parents, lawmakers, watchdogs, advocacy groups and others to work toward change. But our reporting helps them paint a picture of why change is so badly needed.”

My 20-minute interview with Skylar Culbertson is below.

WATCH:

 




Exclusive: Disney’s 11th-Hour Move To Evade DeSantis Oversight Is Legally Void, Per Source

Disney skipped a step required by Florida law in its 11th-hour agreement, according to those familiar with the proceedings.



Disney leadership thought the company out-maneuvered Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis this year after a last-minute agreement with local officials gave the theme park virtually unlimited developmental power. But sources tell The Federalist that Disney’s corporate lawyers missed the fine print in Florida statute governing tourist districts.

In February, supervisors running the Reedy Creek Improvement District signed an 11th-hour resolution to hand Disney maximum authority over the company’s 27,000 acres in central Florida. The late agreement effectively left the DeSantis-appointed successors on the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District board — which replaced the Reedy Creek board — powerless to govern Disney in their own state.

“This essentially makes Disney the government,” said Ron Peri, one of the new board members appointed by the governor, at a Feb. 27 meeting. “This board loses, for practical purposes, the majority of its ability to do anything beyond maintain the roads and maintain basic infrastructure.”

In early April, DeSantis ordered an investigation into Disney’s last-minute power grab. A source familiar with the investigation revealed to The Federalist that Disney skipped key steps when amending its developmental agreement, rendering the resolution null and void.

According to Florida statute, local governments — in this case, the Reedy Creek board — are required to take three steps when making changes to special district agreements such as the one that established Disney’s quasi-governmental status. They must hold two public hearings, advertise those hearings in a local newspaper, and offer notice by mail to “all affected property owners before the first public hearing.”

In a statement to the Associated Press, Disney said the agreements took place in public.

“All agreements signed between Disney and the District were appropriate, and were discussed and approved in open, noticed public forums in compliance with Florida’s Government in the Sunshine law,” the company said.

Disney’s first hearing on the issue was held Jan. 25, and the second on Feb. 8. The company advertised proceedings in the Orlando Sentinel. The last requirement of Florida law, however, that all affected property owners be given notice by mail, was skipped entirely, according to sources familiar with Disney’s proceedings. The missed mandate means the company would have to restart the process for its 11th-hour resolution to be valid.

The agreement circumvented legislation DeSantis signed last year to strip Disney of its special self-governing privileges. Disney’s last-minute move drew a cascade of headlines mocking the Florida governor as a conservative dunce who got it handed to him by Mickey Mouse.

“How Disney just beat Ron DeSantis,” ran a headline from Vox.

“Here’s how Mickey Mouse outplayed Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis,” read an op-ed in the Tampa Bay Times.

Even former President Donald Trump roasted the Florida governor for getting “outplayed, outsmarted, and embarrassed by Mickey Mouse and Disney.”

Memes circulated on the internet.

But the governor may have the last laugh, in a fight that began last year after Disney’s aggressive activism against the Parental Rights in Education Act, inaccurately branded the “Don’t Say Gay” bill. Disney blasted DeSantis over the law, which barred discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity in kindergarten through third-grade classrooms. It was around the same time that audio leaked of Disney employees boasting about implementing their “not-at-all-secret gay agenda.”

“Florida’s HB 1557, also known as the ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill, should never have passed and should never have been signed into law,” the company said in a statement upon the bill’s signage. “Our goal as a company is for this law to be repealed by the legislature or struck down in the courts, and we remain committed to supporting the national and state organizations working to achieve that.”

DeSantis said Disney’s activism “crossed the line.”

“We’re going to make sure we’re fighting back when people are threatening our parents and threatening our kids,” he said at a press conference in Tallahassee.